Journal articles on the topic 'Eparchy of Mukacheve'
To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Eparchy of Mukacheve.
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 17 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Eparchy of Mukacheve.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
MOROZ, Volodymyr. "KYIVAN METROPOLITANATE GENERAL PROCURATOR IN ROME OF 1760–1772, FR IGNATIUS VOLODZKO’S ASSISTANCE CONCERNING THE CANONICAL CREATION OF THE MUKACHEVO EPARCHY." Ukraine: Cultural Heritage, National Identity, Statehood 37 (2023): 32–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.33402/ukr.2023-37-32-44.
Full textAbstract:
The paper describes the Kyivan Metropolitanate Basilian general procurators’ in Rome activities to support the Mukachevo eparchy during the 17–18 centuries. The author studies the vectors and forms of this work by analyzing sources. The direct aim of this investigation is to examine the engagement of Fr Ignatius Volodzko OSBM, the general Basilian procurator of 1760–1772, in the case of canonical erection of the Mukachevo Eparchy of Byzantine Rite and its emancipation from the Eger Diocese of Latin Rite control. The historian ascertained that Fr Volodzko systematically communicated with the Mukachevo bishop Manuel Olshavsky. Fr Volodzko contacted Roman Apostolic Holy See officials to defend the Mukachevo Eparchy’s rights and interests and to speed up the official canonic erection of it in 1771. The researcher reconstructed a list of cardinals and dignitaries in close contact with Fr Volodzko and defined problems they had helped resolve. He also characterized Fr Volodzko’s recommendations to the bishop concerning the struggle for the Eparchy canonical erection in Vienna and Rome. Henceforth the author anatomized and published in attachments two of Fr Volodzko’s letters to bishop Olshavsky from 1766. This correspondence complements the research with information about many events and details during the Mukachevo Eparchy's contention for liberation from the Eger Diocese's “wardship.” The author concludes that the Basilian general procurator in Rome, who indeed officially represented the whole Kyivan Metropolitanate, at the same time was the Mukachevo bishop's deputy in Rome. Bishop Olshavsky trusted Fr Volodzko highly and delegated him largescale authority. As a result, this general procurator and the Kyivan Metropolitanate helped the Mukachevo Eparchy preserve itself and ensure future development. Keywords: Kyivan Metropolitanate, Mukachevo eparchy, Basilian Order of St Josaphat, Manuel Olshavsky, Ivan Bradach, Andrii Bachynskyi, Ignatius Volodzko.
2
Moroz, Volodymyr. "Life of the Mukachevo Bishop Stefan (Simeon) Olsavsky and Metropolitan’s Athanasius Szeptycki charter on his consecration in 1735 (publication of the act)." Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series: History, no. 2 (45) (December 25, 2021): 8–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.24144/2523-4498.2(45).2021.246420.
Full textAbstract:
The paper is devoted to investigating the life and documental heritage of the Mukachevo bishop Stefan (Simeon) Olsavsky (c. 1695 – 1737), especially to publication a charter of his bishopric consecration by the Kyivan Metropolitan Athanasius Szeptycki (1686 – 1746) in Lviv St. Jorge Cathedral on 7 December 1735. The author analyses documental acts regarding the history of publishing separate documents and analyses a set of unpublished sources. On this basis, the historian reconstructs the bishop’s biography, his relations with contemporaries, and his position on eparchial development and administration questions. This research eliminates a lack of information about details of Stefan (Simeon) Olsavsky’s bishopric consecration. Moreover, the paper opposes a tendency to construe his period as some insignificant and undistinguished phase of the local eparchial history. Volodymyr Moroz explains terminological differences in interpreting the Mukachevo eparchy as the real autonomous “diocese” and a “district”, i. e., ritual vicariate of the Roman-Catholic Diocese of Eger in the time of Stefan (Simeon) Olsavsky. The researcher demonstrates that bishop Olsavsky’s decision to receive consecration from the Kyivan Metropolitan was not an accident but a result of his (and his predecessors) aspiring to avoid intrusive domination of the Eger bishops over the Eparchy of Mukachevo. This consecration was the following example of the Mukachevo eparchy’s gravity to union with the Kyivan Metropolitanate in a set of similar events. Significantly, the Metropolitan Athanasius Szeptycki fixed in the charter that Stefan (Simeon) Olsavsky promised his submission to the Holy See, the Pope personally, and the “Our humility” – the Metropolitan of Kyiv. Undoubtedly, the publication of this charter helps to reveal and explain new pages of the Church’s history. It could strengthen interest in studying relations between the Eparchy of Mukachevo and the Kyivan Metropolitanate.
3
Tupytsia, Mykhailo. "The private book collection of Basilian proto-hegumen Anthonius Kotsak in 1781." NaUKMA Research Papers. History 5 (December 28, 2022): 87–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.18523/2617-3417.2022.5.87-96.
Full textAbstract:
The Mukachevo uniate eparchy in the XVIII century experienced extensive transformations in administrative and cultural evolution. The assertion here the post-Trent cultural and intellectual trends actively reflect the preferences of the clerical elite. The article analyzes the thematic repertoire of the private book collection of Anthonius Kotsak – proto-hegumen of Basilian monasteries, doctor of dogmatic theology, teacher and intellectual of the Mukachevo eparchy of the second half of the XVIII century. Before analyzing the book collection, the main conditions that influenced the formation of the eparchy’s clergy in general and Anthonius Kotsak, in particular, are considered. Statistical data collected during archival survay and its comparison with the old books preserved so far allowed the analysis of quantitative indicators of the book collection. The Interdisciplinary approach made possible the analysis of the thematic repertoire of the private book collection and made it possible to determine the direction of Anthonius Kotsak’s reading preferences. The monk’s book collection includes theological, philosophical, historical, philological, preaching, geographical and other works that fully correspond to the scholastic discourse of Jesuit education. The vast majority of texts are in Latin, but there are a few books in Hungarian. The presence of the works of the Eastern Fathers of the Church and the absence of Western ones clearly articulate the monk’s Eastern Christian Basilian piety. Nevertheless, Anthonius Kotsak sought to remain in the discourse of modern for thar times Western theology. The practical need for a multi-confessional region explains an essential emphasis in the repertoire of theological literature in its anti-Protestant orientation. The main principle in the selection of books of Anthonius Kotsak was determined by his professional activity. The expansion of research in the discourse of cultural history and book culture of the Mukachevo eparchy contributes to deeper understanding of the specifics of the diocese and its involvement in the cultural discourse of early modern Europe.
4
Majoroshi, Maria. "THE METROPOLITANATE GALICIA AND THE GREEK CATHOLIC EPARCHY OF MUKACHEVO: DIFFICULT RELATIONS UNDER OCCUPATION REGIMES (1939 – 1944)." Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series: History, no. 1 (44) (June 27, 2021): 43–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.24144/2523-4498.1(44).2021.232448.
Full textAbstract:
The relationships between two Greek Catholic Provinces: the Metropolitanate of Galicia and the Eparchy of Mukachevo under occupation regimes, are highlighted in the article. During this difficult period in the history of both church institutions, cooperation between them was almost impossible since the Metropolitanate of Galicia was already under the Soviet regime while the Eparchy of Mukachevo became part of Hungary. Metropolitan of Galicia Andrey Sheptytsky was forced to fight attacks on the Greek Catholic Church by the "Soviets" and Bishop of Mukachevo Oleksandr Stoyka after receiving the status of "one's own right" ("Ecclesia sui juris") by the Greek Catholic Eparchy of Mukachevo in 1937, was aimed at full autonomy of the eparchy. The author pays special attention to the incident with the arrest of monks from the Order of St. Basil the Great by the Hungarian authorities. The author describes the process of their release, in which bishops Oleksandr Stoyka and Miklosh Dudash, as well as archpriest Leontii Dolhii (Mariiapovchanskyi (Máriapócs) monastery), took an active part. After analyzing the letters of the mentioned bishops to various government structures of the Kingdom of Hungary, the author concluded that they made every effort to get the Basilian monks out of prison as soon as possible. After the first appeals, the arrested monks were transferred from prison to the Jesuit Church in Budapest, and later, until the moment of their liberation, they lived only in monasteries. Finally, the Basilian monks were released and returned to serve in the Greek Catholic Eparchy of Mukachevo in August 1942. They were also allowed to engage in missionary activities and participate in mass events. Based on the analysis of archival sources, namely correspondence between Galician priests (who found themselves in refugee camps in Hungary, Austria and Germany) and Mukachevo bishops, we learn about the fate of these pastors, as well as the fact that Bishop Teodor Romzha accepted them for service in the Greek Catholic Eparchy of Mukachevo. Unfortunately, after the arrival of Soviet authority, Galician priests were arrested: they were accused of anti-Soviet activities and cooperation with the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists and sentenced to imprisonment in correctional camps. The researcher introduced into scientific circulation a series of epistolary sources concerning the history of relations between the two ecclesiastical provinces in 1939 – 1944.
5
Tupytsia, Mykhailo. "CATECHISMS AT THE MUKACHEVO EPARCHY PARISHES IN THE 18TH CENTURY." Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series: History, no. 1 (50) (July 2, 2024): 8–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.24144/2523-4498.1(50).2024.304808.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the study of the spread of catechisms that were in use in the parishes of the Mukachevo eparchy in the 18th century. Catechisms were used to spread the central «truths of faith» in the confessional era in Europe. Several catechetical publications are known in the book culture of the Mukachevo Eparchy of the 18th century. Chief among them as of the first half of the 18th century were the catechisms of Joseph de Camelis and George Gennadius Bizantsius. In addition to these catechisms, the visitation data also mentions the catechism of Laszlo Barany. Each edition reflects a particular model of confessional disciplining and is an element of a broader program of formation of confessional identity by the higher hierarchy. Previous studies on the history of the Mukachevo Eparchy did not pay attention to the importance of catechetical issues for religious communities. Researchers have paid little attention to the distribution of catechisms, although some works analyse the content and sources of their texts. Central studies are devoted to the catechisms of Joseph de Camelis and Laszlo Barany. Meanwhile, the Catechism of George Gennadius Bizantsius has mainly been ignored in historiography. To characterise the spread of catechisms on the territory of the Mukachevo Eparchy, visitation protocols, some acts and epistolary sources were analysed. Special attention is focused on identifying entries in visitation protocols. The entries "casus", "casisticum", "liber casisticum", and the like are preserved in large numbers in the visitation protocols. These entries illustrate the folk name "casus" in relation to the catechism of Lev Kyshka and George Gennadius Bizantsius, which were used on both sides of the Carpathian Mountains. The main content features of each catechism are briefly described. During the study, I managed to process the surviving copies of the Bizantsius and de Camelis catechisms. This article briefly describes the key content features of each catechism. Additionally, the article presents, for the first time, the distribution of George Gennadius Byzantius' catechism in the parishes. This edition's distribution enables us to affirm the obligation to adopt the resolutions of the Zamość Council in the territory of the Mukachevo eparchy.
6
MOLNAR, Fedir. "THE HISTORY OF THE GREEK CATHOLIC EPARCHY OF MUKACHEVO IN 1848–1849." Ukraine: Cultural Heritage, National Identity, Statehood 37 (2023): 45–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.33402/ukr.2023-37-45-56.
Full textAbstract:
The article addresses the problem of role of the Greek Catholic Eparchy of Mukachevo in the Hungarian Revolution and War of Independence of 1848–1849. Considerable attention is paid to analyze the religious and political activity of Bishop Vasyl Popovych of Mukachevo. The author highlights that the spring events of 1848 created a new situation in Hungary. First in the history of the country a government accountable to the legislation was formed, whose first measures included the abolishment of serfdom. The so-called «April Laws» of 1848 sanctioned by Ferdinand V, the Habsburg king of Hungary had a great influence on the feudal system. The last Diet of Reform Era adopted laws, which paved a way for the bourgeois transformation of the country. It is alleged that one of the most important issues was the determination of the relationship between church and state in spring 1848. This time, the relationship between the Batthyány Goverment and the leaders of the Catholic Church of Hungary was not free from difficulties. The Catholic Church has lost its state religion status. The history of the Eparchy of Mukachevo in the revolutionary events of 1848–1849 is one of the less researched issues. On the basis of analysis of the review of archival sources and historiography of the topic, it is established that the Eparchy of Mukachevo played an exceptional role in support of hinterland of the Hungarian War of Independence. As noted, it had jurisdiction over seven counties in Northeastern Hungary (Zemplin, Ung, Bereg, Ugocha, Sotmar, Sabolch and Maramorosh) and the Hajdú District populated by Rusyn-, Hungarian- and Romanian-speaking believers. Thus, the Greek Catholic clergy had a strategic role to ensure peace between the different peoples. The author comes to the conclusion that Bishop Vasyl Popovych and his prelacy trusted in the goodwill of the Hungarian liberal leaders. The bishop focused on the interests of his eparchy in all circumstances. The years of 1848–1849 were abundant in political and military turns. Popovych was always far from any form of extremism, calmness and prudence controlled his actions. In the end, it is revealed that the Greek Catholic clergy believed: the Hungarian government wanted to create a country, where the Byzantine rite community gets into a favourable, more honoured position. Key words: Greek Catholic Eparchy of Mukachevo, Bishop Vasyl Popovych, Northeastern Hungary, Lajos Kossuth, Catholic Church of Hungary.
7
MOLNAR, Fedir. "THE PROGRAMMES OF THE GREEK CATHOLIC CLERGY OF NORTHEASTERN HUNGARY (1860–1867)." Ukraine: Cultural Heritage, National Identity, Statehood 36 (2022): 37–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.33402/ukr.2022-36-37-49.
Full textAbstract:
The article addresses the problem of religious and political activity of the Greek Catholic clergy of Northeastern Hungary between 1860 and 1867. Considerable attention is paid to analyze the role of the local Rusyn leaders. Among the nationalities of the Hungarian Kingdom in the ХІХ century, the Rusyns were considered to be the poorest people, both materially and culturally. Their society was truncated, in other words, incompletely structured, consisting of the vast majority of peasants. The author highlights that in the absence of nobility and citizenry, their Greek Catholic clergy served as elites. Their ecclesiastical organization provided an appropriate framework and base for the development of their national culture and literature. The most significant ecclesiastical structure of the Rusyns in Northeastern Hungary was the Greek Catholic Eparchy of Mukachevo, which had jurisdiction over seven Hungarian counties (Zemplén, Ung, Bereg, Ugocsa, Máramaros, Szabolcs and Szatmár). The current bishop of the diocese resided in Uzhhorod was the number one leader of the Rusyns. It is alleged that the so-called October Diploma, enacted by Austrian Emperor Franz Joseph on October 20, 1860, proclaimed a return to constitutional principles. On the basis of analysis of the various programmes of the Greek Catholic priests of the Eparchy of Mukachevo, it is established that the October Diploma had a great impact on the Rusyns of Hungary. This time, Adolf Dobriansky, a councillor of Hungary’s Lieutenancy Council claims the federal transformation of Hungary, the establishment of an independent Rusyn congress and a Greek Catholic archbishopric. As noted, his ideas also influenced many Rusyn priests. The traditionally pro-Hungarian Bishop of Mukachevo, Vasyl Popovych and his followers rejected Dobriansky’s ideas because of their «radical» nature. Instead, the Consistory of Uzhhorod wanted to accept nationality demands exclusively in cooperation with the Hungarian Parliament. The author comes to the conclusion that after the Austro-Hungarian Compromise of 1867, the pro-Hungarian Greek Catholic clergy of the Eparchy of Mukachevo was satisfied with the rights enshrined in the Nationalities Law of 1868. In the end it is revealed that the clergy believed: the state subsidies of the Diocese of Mukachevo would have been at risk by claiming nationality rights. The article summarizes the new material on the topic under study, introduces it into scientific circulation.
8
Monych, Olexander. "Church-administrative activities of Mukachevo «quasi»-bishop Ivan Joseph Godermarsky by the documents of State Archives in Transcarpathian Region." 33, no. 33 (November 28, 2021): 5–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.26565/2227-6505-2021-33-01.
Full textAbstract:
The administrative activities of the bishop-nominee Ivan Joseph Godermarsky (1706–1716) is quite fully covered in the domestic historical literature. However, due to the lack of sources from local State Archives in Transcarpathian region presented in these publications– the topic remains open for further, scrupulous research. The aim of the research is to reconstruct church-administrative activities of Mukachevo «quasi»-bishop Ivan Joseph Godermarsky after discovery of the materials of the State Archives in Transcarpathian region. The methodological basis of the study are the principles of heuristics, interdisciplinary and documentary analysis, historicism, objectivity and synthesis. The principle of heuristics makes it possible to introduce the discovered documents into the scientific circulation, thanks to which the constant knowledge about the activities of the «quasi»-bishop Godermarsky is significantly expanded. The interdisciplinary approach considerably enriches the narrow framework of the bishop's church-administrative service and offers a more objective description of the bishop's activities. The principle of historicism makes it possible to reproduce the chronology and certain aspects of the bishop's rule in the context of church-political relations in the region. The objectivity of the research is expressed in unbiased coverage of the bishop's activities. Scientific analysis and synthesis allow us to determine the place and role of the bishop-nominee in the history of the development of Mukachevo Greek-Catholic Eparchy in the first quarter of the 18th century. Scientific novelty of the research. Today, more and more often, permanent knowledge about the formation and development of both Mukachevo Greek Catholic and Máramaros Orthodox Eparchies is updated with new documents and relevant research. The proposed research primarily introduces new sources into the scientific circulation, which significantly supplement the historical past of the ecclesiastical Transcarpathia with new data. Secondly, the research presents separate documents released from the field of view of the predecessors, the introduction of which to the scientific world today corrects permanent conclusions and allows to expand the thematic range of research related to the activities of Mukachevo and Máramaros Episcopates in the first half of the 18th century. The practical significance of the obtained results will contribute to a comprehensive study of both the ecclesiastical past of the Orthodox and Greek Catholic Churches in Transcarpathia in the 18th century, as well as a comprehensive study of the ecclesiastical history of Ukraine in general. Conclusions. The activities of the «quasi»-bishop Ivan Joseph Godermarsky vividly demonstrate another «black day» in the post-Union development of Mukachevo Greek Catholic Eparchy. During his reign, the bishop-nominee, due to personal ambitions, brought more problems to the eparchy than benefits that would contribute to the formation of an ecclesiastical unit. At the same time, his church-administrative activity contributed to the spread of the union in the eparchy and the jurisdictional incorporation of the Orthodox parishes of Ugochansky and Máramaros counties.
9
Kichera, Viktor. "History of the Mukachevo Greek Catholic Eparchy in Periodicals of 1918–1945." Acta historica Neosoliensia 26, no. 1 (October 4, 2023): 31–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.24040/ahn.2023.26.01.31-57.
Full textAbstract:
In the proposed article, an attempt is made to critically study the history of the Mukachevo Greek Catholic Eparchy (MGCE) on the basis of the press. First of all, attention is focused on the regional press. In general, both church and secular publications were used. The period was not chosen by chance, because it is the period of the interwar and wartime periods of the Czechoslovak Republic. The main task of the research is to study not only the subject matter of the publications, but also the views that were covered in each periodical. The fact is that depending on the edition and the publisher, the content of the publications was appropriate. If religious topics and protection of the Church prevailed in church periodicals, then in government or independent periodicals, in addition to general news, there were also critical articles about the Church. Particular attention is paid to historical topics in these periodicals on the history of the Mukachevo Eparchy. In general, information in journals and the press can significantly supplement historical knowledge not only of the history of the Church, but also of the history of state-church relations and the history of Czechoslovakia of the studied period.
10
Molnár, Ferenc. "The life and work of Stefan Pankovych, the Bishop of the Greek Catholic Eparchy of Mukachevo." Rusin, no. 64 (2021): 52–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.17223/18572685/64/3.
Full textAbstract:
When Bishop Stefan Pankovych (1866–1874), who succeeded Vasyl Popovych (died in 1864) was inaugurated, he was almost unknown to the Rusin clergy of the Greek Catholic Eparchy of Mukachevo. The new bishop maintained good relations with members of the Hungarian political elite and actively supported the policy of the Hungarian government. This was manifested on several levels. He promoted to high ecclesiastical positions those who did not support Adolf Dobriansky, a Russophile considered the most significant Rusin leader. Following the Austro-Hungarian Compromise of 1867, Rusin leaders had the opportunity to hold various offices, mainly with the trust of the Hungarian government and the Bishop of Mukachevo. In 1871, Bishop Stefan Pankovych and his followers removed Adolf Dobriansky and Ivan Rakovsky from the leadership in St. Basil the Great Society, which led to a gradual decline of the Russophile trend in the Rusin movement. The Great Russian camp supporters also confronted Stefan Pankovych because of the attempt to introduce the Gregorian calendar and the Latin alphabet in the Mukachevo Diocese. Even more moderate clergy were divided on such issues, because these concepts were important for Rusin identity. However, Stefan Pankovich’s unexpected death on August 29, 1874, temporarily froze debates in the Rusin movement.
11
Coranič, J. "Bishop Jozef Gaganec (1793–1875) – a leading figure of the religious, national and cultural life of Greek Catholics and Rusins in the mid-19th century in present-day Slovakia." Rusin, no. 65 (2021): 55–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.17223/18572685/65/4.
Full textAbstract:
The second bishop of Prešov, Jozef Gaganec is one of the greatest figures in the history of the Greek Catholic Eparchy of Prešov. During his tenure (1843–1875), Bishop Gaganec successfully continued the work of his predecessor, Bishop Tarkovič. He took upon himself a task of firmly establishing the eparchy and securing its future development and prosperity in the mid-19th century. He ensured its organizational stability, financial provision, and pastoral unity. Bishop Gaganec governed his eparchy in very uncertain and complicated times (revolution of 1848–1849, poor harvests, famines, emigration, etc.) that significantly affected his episcopacy. He made every effort to alleviate the social impacts that this period brought upon both the clergy and regular folks. Bishop Gaganec got involved in ecclesiastical and religious reforms, for instance, he introduced a strict liturgical order in the eparchy. He also channelled his effort into improving the religious life of the clergy and congregation. He strongly promoted cultural and publishing activities, which he considered vital for a spiritual life of his flock. Bishop Gaganec participated in almost all cultural activities of Greek Catholics and largely contributed to the establishment of many cultural institutions in the Prešov and Mukachevo eparchies. He also played an important role in the national and political life of Greek Catholic Rusins during and after the revolutionary years of 1848–1849. In appreciation of his many religious, cultural, and national activities, Bishop Gaganec was acknowledged by the Austrian emperor and the Roman Pontiff. He justly deserves the title “the Father of the Prešov Eparchy”.
12
Maioroshi, Mariia. "Galician Basilian Monks and the Reform of the OSBG in Mukachevo Greek Catholic Eparchy." Ukrainian Studies, no. 1(78) (May 20, 2021): 217–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.30840/2413-7065.1(78).2021.225900.
Full textAbstract:
The article analyzes the activities of Galician Basilian monks through the prism of the OSBG (Order of St. Basil the Great) reform in Mukachevo Greek Catholic eparchy. Relying on a wide range of archival sources and using modern socioanthropological methodological approaches, the author has clarified the preconditions and reasons for the Order’s reform and described the attitude of Greek Catholic monks to those changes. In the course of the study, the author has come to the conclusion that as of December 1938, all monasteries of Subcarpathian Ruthenia were involved in the reform. Of course, each monastery was in a different state and had certain functions. Thus, Mukachevo monastery became a center of pilgrimage and an educational base for monks with a strong novitiate (according to the inspection carried out by Professor Josef Foltynovskyi on behalf of Pope Pius XI as of December 10, 1924, it included a total of 21 novices). Uzhhorod monastery turned into a cultural and educational center, successfully training students and operating a printing house. Malyi Bereznyi monastery was the heart of the missionary movement, providing after 1928 philosophical and theological studies for candidates’ preparation, while, due to their later involvement in the reform, Imstychiv and Boroniavo monasteries remained in the most difficult condition and hosted unreformed monks.
13
Moroz, Volodymyr. "«RUS’ IS BONE OF OUR BONES AND FLASH OF OUR FLASHE»: DID THE MUKACHEVO BISHOP PARTENII PETROVYCH WAS A SERBIAN?" Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series: History, no. 1 (48) (June 11, 2023): 8–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.24144/2523-4498.1(48).2023.279935.
Full textAbstract:
This research aims to ascertain the origin of the Mukachevo Uniate bishop Partenii Petrovych (1651 – 1665), who was elected by the clergy after a testament of the previous bishop Vasyl Tarasovych. The complex studying of documental sources and hypotheses concerning the bishop’s national background and territorial affiliation, as well as applying results of content analysis of his legacy, is the method we used in this work. A methodological approach that considers strong relations between the Mukachevo eparchy and the Kyivan Metropolitanate became a framework base for this exploration. This base allowed us to arrange data from sources, including genealogical and topographical, and generate a scholarly novelty of the inquiry. Our study enabled us to disclaim theses about Petrovych’s Serbian origin. The investigation ascertained the bishop’s Ukrainian origin from the village Synevyrska Poliana in the Zakarpattia region of Ukraine. We discovered the hierarch was a Petrovychi branch of the Kulczycki noble family member from the Peremyshl Land of Ruthenian Voivodeship in the Polish Crown. Moreover, Partenii Petrovych was a relative of Vasyl Tarasovych, because Tarasovychi is the other branch of the Kulczycki family. While revealing Petrovych’s origins, we explain his installation on the Episcopal see and his positioning as a native, not an immigrant. In common, the legacy of bishops Tarasovych and Petrovych from the Kulczycki family induced the third member of the same family, hieromonk Porphyrii, to become a candidate for the Mukachevo Episcopal see in the 1680th. The Polish king John III Sobieski and possibly the hero of the Battle of Vienna in 1683, Yurii-Frants Kulczycki, supported him in these attempts. Nevertheless, Porphyrii became not the bishop of Mukachevo but Pinsk and Turov.
14
Danilets, Jurij V. "The Journal of the Moscow Patriarchate" as a source of the Mukachevo-Uzhgorod Eparchy history in 1945-1955." Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 429 (February 1, 2018): 117–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.17223/15617793/429/14.
Full text
15
Halemba, Agnieszka. "Suffering for and against the church. The politics of memory and repression in the Mukachevo Greek Catholic Eparchy." Religion, State and Society 46, no. 2 (April 3, 2018): 123–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09637494.2018.1456781.
Full text
16
Moroz, Volodymyr. "The Mukachevo Basilian hegumen, historian, and writer Anatolii Kralytskyi’s OSBM (1835–1894) activity for popularizing of Mykola Kostomarov’s heritage." 34, no. 34 (June 30, 2022): 26–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.26565/2227-6505-2022-34-03.
Full textAbstract:
The research aim is to investigate knowledge of Mykola Kostomarov’s works by Fr Anatolii Kralytskyi, a historian, ethnographer, journalist, writer, and hegumen at the Mukachevo Basilian monastery in 1869–1894. The author analyses Kralytskyi’s learning of Kostomarov’s ideas and describes hegumen’s activity in popularizing them. Research methodology. The article uses the methods of intellectual history to discuss Kostomarov’s heritage influence on Kralytskyi, the prominent historian and journalist of the Basilian Order of St. Josaphat and the Mukachevo Eparchy in the second part of the XIX century. Scientific novelty. For the first time in historiography, Volodymyr Moroz compares the works of Kostomarov and Kralytskyi with insights into the Basilian intellectual activity to describe his learning ideas of the outstanding historian. The author defines Kralytskyi’s appreciation of Kostomarov’s heritage and his work to transmit some Conclusions. The author found that Anatolii Kralytskyi could read works and learn the ideas of Mykola Kostomarov concerning Ukrainian history and the national question. Firstly, the monk published his texts in the periodical literature of Galicia already in the early 1860s, where Kostomarov’s texts were simultaneously published. For the second, in 1875, Kralytskyi received a set of Kostomarov’s books from Mykhailo Drahomanov. Kostomarov’s arguments had become so attractive to Basilian that he publicly declared Kostomarov was the most significant historian of his time. The article ascertains that Kralytskyi used Kostomarov’s ideas to strengthen his arguments. He did so while being included in transmitting the Ukrainian population from the archaic “Old-Ruthenian” identity to the new one. At the same time, the author explains, these significant changes included a Russophillian stage in the Galicia and Zakarpattia.
17
Moroz, Volodymyr. "INFLUENCE OF THE KYIV METROPOLITANATE ON THE ATTEMPTS AT CHURCH UNION IN THE EPARCHY OF MUKACHEVO IN THE TIMES OF HYPATIUS POCIEJ AND JOSEF VELIAMYN RUTSKY." Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University. Series: History, no. 1 (40) (June 24, 2019): 78–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.24144/2523-4498.1(40).2019.170525.
Full text