Academic literature on the topic 'Environmental justice – Philosophy – Australia'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Environmental justice – Philosophy – Australia.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Environmental justice – Philosophy – Australia"
Graham, Simon, Ilias Kamitsis, Michelle Kennedy, Christina Heris, Tess Bright, Shannon K. Bennetts, Kimberley A. Jones, et al. "A Culturally Responsive Trauma-Informed Public Health Emergency Framework for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Communities in Australia, Developed during COVID-19." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 23 (November 24, 2022): 15626. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315626.
Full textHenning, Brian G. "Environmental Justice." International Philosophical Quarterly 44, no. 2 (2004): 273–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/ipq20044429.
Full textHartley, Troy W. "Environmental Justice." Environmental Ethics 17, no. 3 (1995): 277–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics199517318.
Full textPerhac,, Ralph M. "Environmental Justice." Environmental Ethics 21, no. 1 (1999): 81–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics199921143.
Full textWarren, Karen J. "Environmental Justice." Environmental Ethics 21, no. 2 (1999): 151–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics199921228.
Full textRasmussen, Larry. "Environmental Racism and Environmental Justice." Journal of the Society of Christian Ethics 24, no. 1 (2004): 3–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/jsce200424121.
Full textPanayotakis, Costas. "Defining Environmental Justice." Environmental Ethics 31, no. 3 (2009): 317–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics200931333.
Full textHaught, Paul. "Environmental Virtues and Environmental Justice." Environmental Ethics 33, no. 4 (2011): 357–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics201133442.
Full textArcioni, Elisa, and Glenn Mitchell. "Environmental Justice in Australia: When the RATS Became IRATE." Environmental Politics 14, no. 3 (June 2005): 363–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09644010500087590.
Full textKatz, Eric. "Peter Wenz: Environmental Justice." Environmental Ethics 11, no. 3 (1989): 269–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics198911313.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Environmental justice – Philosophy – Australia"
Utsler, David. "Hermeneutics, Environments, and Justice." Thesis, University of North Texas, 2019. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1538781/.
Full textFrench, Robert Heath. "Environmental Philosophy and the Ethics of Terraforming Mars: Adding the Voices of Environmental Justice and Ecofeminism to the Ongoing Debate." Thesis, University of North Texas, 2013. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc283810/.
Full textMysak, Mark. "The Environmental is Political: Exploring the Geography of Environmental Justice." Thesis, University of North Texas, 2010. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc30497/.
Full textNelson, Zachary. "Ecological libertarianism| The case for nonhuman self-ownership." Thesis, Colorado State University, 2016. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10138975.
Full textThe field of environmental political theory has made great gains in its relatively short existence as an academic discipline. One area in which these advancements can be noticed is the strong discussion surrounding the foundations, institutions, and processes of Western liberalism and the relationship of these elements to issues of environmentalism. Within this discussion has manifested the bedrock assumption that the underlying components of classical liberalism – namely individualism, negative liberties, and instrumental rationality – preclude or greatly hinder progress toward securing collective environmental needs. This assumption has great intuitive strength as well as exhibition in liberal democracies such as the United States. However, in using this assumption as a launchpad for reconsidering elements of liberalism scholars have inadvertently closed alternate routes of analysis and theorization. This thesis aims to explore one such alternate route.
Libertarianism, the contemporary reincarnation of classical liberalism, has been generally disregarded in policy and academic realms due to its stringent and inflexible adherence to self-interest, instrumental rationality, and individualism; in discussions of environment, these complaints are only augmented. These criticisms have been validated by a libertarian scholarship that emphasized nature as a warehouse of resources specifically suited for human use. But from where in libertarianism does this ontology develop, and is it correct? This thesis carries this investigation through its overarching research question: can nonhumans have self-ownership within libertarian theory, and what would that mean for libertarian theory?
Part I of the thesis introduces us to the foundation, tenants, and overall logical structure of contemporary libertarian theory. Finding autonomy to be the key to moral standing, and finding autonomy to be a contested criterion, we discover the shaky ground on which the totality of libertarianism stands. After identifying the relationship of libertarianism and the environment – one of atomistic, instrumental, and anthropocentric utilization – we connect the current non-standing moral status of nonhumans in libertarian theory directly to criteria of autonomy. With autonomy acknowledged as a contested subject, we thus arrive at the conclusion that the lack of moral status awarded to nonhumans has arisen not through logical derivation but the reification of tradition.
Part II centers on the establishment of a proper framework for the task of evaluating libertarianism’s main criteria of autonomy. This framework is grounded foremost in the recognition of the inherent social embeddedness within libertarian theory; this embeddedness is founded in the necessary reciprocation of liberty protections through the principles of non-aggression and non-interference and, while acknowledged by libertarian theorists, remained a largely undernourished portion of libertarian theory. To counter anthropocentric bias – in effort to ward off the influence of tradition – additional ecological criteria are added to this framework, culminating in an open, non-anthropocentric framework. Afterward, the chapter examines the Naturalistic Fallacy. Finding our answer in the naturally morally pragmatic nature of Man, this discussion finalizes our analytic framework by emphasizing the practical importance of moral reasoning.
Part III sets about the task of examining the criteria of autonomy utilized within libertarian theory. Two conceptions of autonomy – minimalist and prudentialist – are defined, with discussion showing libertarianism to rely, inherently and explicitly, on prudentialist forms of autonomy. The two primary criteria of prudentialism used, life-planning and reason, are then analyzed in turn; this analysis manifests the critique that in the practical usage of morality both criteria rely on and collapse into minimalism. Prudentialism as a standard is then examined to show its paradoxical reliance on pre-formulated conceptions of human lives, to the detriment of logical consistency and the virtues of negative liberty. Singer’s criterion of suffering is then briefly examined, with discussion outlining its inapplicability within libertarian theory. Narveson’s question of the moral egoist completes the chapter, with the linkage between nonhuman domination and human domination solidifying the argument that full nonhuman moral standing will reduce both to the advantage of libertarian society. From these critiques, then, we observe the critical failure of prudentialism to hold in praxis and see minimalist autonomy as the necessary foundation for libertarian theory.
Part IV outlines some consequences of minimalist autonomy within libertarian theory. The questions of reciprocity and nonhuman violence are examined, with discussions of complications and critiques following. These complications comprise the intersection of ecological libertarianism with extant issues within libertarian theory, such as Nozick’s Principle of Rectification, the moral allowance of self-defense, and the question of the moral standing of children. Afterward, the broader conversation is considered along with specific consideration of the potential environmental impacts of an ecological libertarian theory. Lastly, some doors for future theorizing are opened – namely the conceptualization of nonhuman labor and nonhuman property rights – for future critical investigation. (Abstract shortened by ProQuest.)
Kolloer, Thomas Henry. "Environmental philosophy in international law : a study of environmental philosophical perspectives in decisions of the International Court of Justice." Thesis, University of Birmingham, 2017. http://etheses.bham.ac.uk//id/eprint/7473/.
Full textWarnke, Jeffery H. "Civic Education in an Age of Ecological Crisis: A Rawlsian Political Liberal Conception." University of Toledo / OhioLINK, 2016. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=toledo1461802361.
Full textCantzler, Julia Miller. "Culture, History and Contention: Political Struggle and Claims-Making over Indigenous Fishing Rights in Australia, New Zealand and the United States." The Ohio State University, 2011. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1306269394.
Full textForan, Heather. "Host Experiences of Educational Travel Programs| Challenges and Opportunities from a Decolonization Lens." Thesis, Prescott College, 2016. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=1606218.
Full textThe transformative benefits of cross-cultural interaction and the “disruption” caused by the confrontation with injustice, poverty and culture shock for students through immersion experiences are well-documented. In contrast, however, there is very little research that documents the experience of host communities - those into whom the traveler is immersed. What is the experience of individuals from these host communities? What is the value or significance to them of hosting educational travel groups? What opportunities exist for educational travel programs to be venues for decolonization and social justice work that is mutually beneficial to student groups and host communities? This project is a phenomenological study consisting of in-depth interviews with six native or indigenous community partners who worked with two high school educational travel programs—one internationally and one domestically. Participants reported a clear understanding of their co-educational role and attached broader global and spiritual significance to that. A number of recommendations emerged for building mutually beneficial relationships in the context of educational travel.
Christion, Tim. "Motivating Collective Action in Response to an Existential Threat: Critical Phenomenology in a Climate-Changing World." Thesis, University of Oregon, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/1794/24554.
Full textFrigo, Giovanni. "Toward an Ecocentric Philosophy of Energy in a Time of Transition." Thesis, University of North Texas, 2018. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1248406/.
Full textBooks on the topic "Environmental justice – Philosophy – Australia"
Pāla, Santosha Kumāra. Samakālīna paribeśa-nītiśāstrera rūparekhā. Kalakātā: Lebhānta Bukas, 2008.
Find full textPāla, Santosha Kumāra. Samakālīna paribeśa-nītiśāstrera rūparekhā. Kalakātā: Lebhānta Bukas, 2008.
Find full textPāla, Santosha Kumāra. Samakālīna paribeśa-nītiśāstrera rūparekhā. Kalakātā: Lebhānta Bukas, 2008.
Find full textHuan jing zheng yi de fa zhe xue yan jiu: The legal philosophy study on environment justice. Yanbian Shi: Yanbian da xue chu ban she, 2005.
Find full textCullinan, Cormac. Wild law: A manifesto for Earth justice. Dartington: Green Books in association with the Gaia Foundation, 2003.
Find full textThe ecological life: Discovering citizenship and a sense of humanity. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group, Inc., 2006.
Find full textCullinan, Cormac. Wild law: A manifesto for Earth justice. 2nd ed. Cambridge, [England]: Green Books, 2011.
Find full textIsaak, Robert. Green logic: Ecopreneurship, theory and ethics. Sheffield: Greenleaf, 1998.
Find full textIsaak, Robert. Green logic: Ecopreneurship, theory and ethics. West Hartford, Conn: Kumarian Press, 1999.
Find full textIsaak, Robert A. Green logic: Ecopreneurship, theory, and ethics. West Hartford, Conn: Kumarian Press, 1999.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Environmental justice – Philosophy – Australia"
Risse, Mathias. "Environmental Justice." In Global Political Philosophy, 119–43. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137283443_6.
Full textMathews, Freya. "Environmental Philosophy." In History of Philosophy in Australia and New Zealand, 543–91. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6958-8_22.
Full textChemhuru, Munamato. "African Relational Environmental Justice." In Environmental Justice in African Philosophy, 75–98. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003176718-5.
Full textChemhuru, Munamato. "African Ecofeminist Environmental Justice." In Environmental Justice in African Philosophy, 99–120. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003176718-6.
Full textCantzler, Julia Miller. "Colonization and fishing in Australia, New Zealand and the United States." In Environmental Justice as Decolonization, 15–39. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2020.: Routledge, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429259524-2.
Full textChemhuru, Munamato. "Environmental (in)Justice in Africa." In Environmental Justice in African Philosophy, 34–54. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003176718-3.
Full textChemhuru, Munamato. "Environmental Ethics in African Philosophy." In Environmental Justice in African Philosophy, 8–33. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003176718-2.
Full textChemhuru, Munamato. "Introduction." In Environmental Justice in African Philosophy, 1–7. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003176718-1.
Full textChemhuru, Munamato. "Intergenerational Environmental Justice in African Philosophy." In Environmental Justice in African Philosophy, 121–41. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003176718-7.
Full textChemhuru, Munamato. "Environmental Justice from an African Land Ethic." In Environmental Justice in African Philosophy, 55–74. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003176718-4.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Environmental justice – Philosophy – Australia"
Thomas, Joyce, and Megan Strickfaden. "Design for the Real World: a look back at Papanek from the 21st Century." In 13th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics (AHFE 2022). AHFE International, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002010.
Full text