Journal articles on the topic 'Endoscopic drainage'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Endoscopic drainage.

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Endoscopic drainage.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Noro, Takuji, Naruo Kawasaki, Hironori Ohdaira, Reo Takizawa, Norihiko Suzuki, and Yutaka Suzuki. "A New Endoscopic Method: Percutaneous Endoscopic Trans-Gastric Biliary Drainage as an Option for Biliary Drainage." Nihon Gekakei Rengo Gakkaishi (Journal of Japanese College of Surgeons) 37, no. 5 (2012): 937–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.4030/jjcs.37.937.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Hasebe, Osamu. "Transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts: Endoscopic drainage or endoscopic ultrasonographic-guided drainage?" Digestive Endoscopy 13, s1 (July 2001): S60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1443-1661.2001.0130s1s60.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Mori, Akihiro, Shun Ito, Takayuki Yumura, Hiroki Hachiya, Masashi Sawada, Shintaro Hayashi, and Noritsugu Ohashi. "Development of an external-to-internal convertible endoscopic biliary drainage device – a preliminary prospective feasibility study." Endoscopy International Open 06, no. 01 (January 2018): E123—E126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-123934.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) for a malignant stricture in the bile duct has some advantages over endoscopic biliary stenting (EBS). However, ENBD may cause nasopharyngeal discomfort. We developed an external-to-internal convertible endoscopic biliary drainage (ETI-EBD) device that enables both internal and external drainage to occur during a single endoscopy. Patients and methods This device consists of three parts, comprising a 5-Fr ENBD tube (250 cm) (ENBD-t), an 8.5-Fr EBS tube (7 cm) (EBS-t), and an 8-Fr pusher tube for EBS (230 cm) (P-t). The EBS-t is mounted over the ENBD-t at the distal end of the ENBD-t. The P-t is also placed over the ENBD-t. After an endoscopic sphincterotomy, the EBS-t of the device is inserted into the papilla, then the duodenal endoscope is withdrawn, leaving the device in place. After ENBD, only the ENBD-t was withdrawn from the P-t. At this point, the EBS-t was isolated and left without endoscopy or radiography. Results ETI-EBD was successfully placed in all consecutive 21 patients (100 %). The release of EBS-t from ENBD-t wit was successfully completed in 19 patients (90.5 %). There were 4 patients with kink of P-t when exchanging this device from the mouth to the nose. It was difficult for 2 patients to withdraw the ENBD-t because of poor lubrication performance. There were no significant complications associated with the use of the device. Conclusion This device allows for both external and internal biliary drainage with a single endoscopy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Tanisaka, Yuki, Masafumi Mizuide, Akashi Fujita, Tomoya Ogawa, Hiromune Katsuda, Youichi Saito, Kazuya Miyaguchi, et al. "Current Status of Endoscopic Biliary Drainage in Patients with Distal Malignant Biliary Obstruction." Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 19 (October 8, 2021): 4619. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10194619.

Full text
Abstract:
Distal malignant biliary obstruction is caused by various malignant diseases that require biliary drainage. In patients with operable situations, preoperative biliary drainage is required to control jaundice and cholangitis until surgery. In view of tract seeding, endoscopic biliary drainage is the first choice. Since neoadjuvant therapies are being developed, the time to surgery is increasing, especially in pancreatic cancer cases. Therefore, it requires long stent patency. Recently, preoperative biliary drainage using self-expandable metal stents has been reported as a useful modality to secure long stent patency. In patients with unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction, self-expandable metal stent is the first choice for maintaining long stent patency. Although there are many comparison studies between a covered and an uncovered self-expandable metal stent, their use is still controversial. Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage has been performed as an alternative treatment. The clinical success and stent patency are favorable. We should take into consideration that both endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-guided biliary drainage and endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage have advantages and disadvantages and chose the drainage method depending on the patient’s situation or the expertise of the endoscopist. Here, we discuss the current status of endoscopic biliary drainage in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Adler, Douglas G. "Endoscopic Gallbladder Drainage." American Journal of Gastroenterology 114, no. 5 (January 18, 2019): 700–702. http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000000067.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Kiil, J., A. Kruse, and M. Rokkjaer. "Endoscopic biliary drainage." British Journal of Surgery 74, no. 12 (December 1987): 1087–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800741206.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Varadarajulu, Shyam. "Endoscopic management of pancreatic pseudocysts." Journal of Digestive Endoscopy 03, S 05 (January 2012): 058–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-5042.95035.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe conventional management of pancreatic pseudocysts involves surgery or percutaneous drainage. While surgery is associated with significant complications and mortality, percutaneous drainage is associated with prolonged hospitalization and often times the need for other adjunctive treatment measures. Therefore, the use of endoscopy to drain these pseudocysts is becoming increasingly popular. In this review, we will be examining the techniques, outcomes and costs associated with the endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Ishii, Shigeto, Toshio Fujisawa, Hiroyuki Isayama, Shingo Asahara, Shingo Ogiwara, Hironao Okubo, Hisafumi Yamagata, et al. "Clinical Evaluation of a Newly Developed Guidewire for Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy." Journal of Clinical Medicine 9, no. 12 (December 16, 2020): 4059. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9124059.

Full text
Abstract:
Background: The guidewire (GW) plays an important role in pancreatobiliary endoscopy. GW quality is a critical factor in the effectiveness and efficiency of pancreatobiliary endoscopy. In this study, we evaluate a new 0.025 inch multipurpose endoscopic GW: the M-Through. Methods: Our study was a multicenter retrospective analysis. We enrolled patients who underwent endoscopic procedures using the M-Through between May 2018 and April 2020. Patients receiving the following endoscopic treatments were enrolled: common bile duct (CBD) stone extraction, endoscopic drainage for distal and hilar malignant biliary obstruction (MBO), and endoscopic drainage for acute cholecystitis. For each procedure, we examined the rate of success without GW exchange. Results: A total of 170 patients (80 with CBD stones, 60 with MBO, and 30 with cholecystitis) were enrolled. The rate of completion without GW exchange was 100% for CBD stone extraction, 83.3% for endoscopic drainage for MBO, and 43.3% for endoscopic drainage for cholecystitis. In unsuccessful cholecystitis cases with the original GW manipulator, 1 of 8 cases succeeded in the manipulator exchange. Including 6 cases who changed GW after the manipulator exchange, 11 of 16 cases succeeded in changing GW. There was significant difference in the success rate between the manipulator exchange and GW exchange (p = 0.03). The insertion of devices and stent placement after biliary cannulation (regardless of type) were almost completed with M-through. We observed no intraoperative GW-related adverse events such as perforation and bleeding due to manipulation. Conclusion: The 0.025 inch M-Through can be used for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related procedures efficiently and safely. Our study found high rates of success without GW exchange in all procedures except for endoscopic drainage for cholecystitis. This GW is considered (1) excellent for supportability of device insertion to remove CBD stones; (2) good for seeking the biliary malignant stricture but sometimes need the help of a hydrophilic GW; (3) suboptimal for gallbladder drainage that require a high level of seeking ability.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

KIMURA, Katsumi, Naotaka FUJITA, Yutaka NODA, Go KOBAYASHI, Akio YAGO, Akimichi CHONAN, Atsuo MATSUNAGA, et al. "Endoscopic Biliary Drainage without Endoscopic Sphincterotomy." Digestive Endoscopy 7, no. 2 (April 1995): 175–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1443-1661.1995.tb00158.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Ramesh, H. "Chronic pancreatitis: The case for surgery." Journal of Digestive Endoscopy 03, S 05 (January 2012): 053–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0976-5042.95033.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractTreatment of pain in chronic pancreatitis includes medical, endoscopic and surgical therapy. Medical treatment may involve the use of analgesics, pancreatic enzymes, antioxidants and removal of risk factors. However, a substantial number of patients do not experience pain relief with medical treatment, and those with local complications cannot be treated medically indefinitely. These require endoscopic or surgical therapy. Endoscopic therapy has involved the use of a) pancreatic sphincterotomy, b) stent placement, c) nasopancreatic drainage, d) pseudocyst drainage, e) extra corporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), and f) dilatation of strictures. The current options for surgical therapy include: a) partial pancreatic resections, b) extended pancreatic drainage procedures (which involve additional subtotal resection of the head or a deep coring out of the head, or c) pure pancreatic drainage procedures. In effect surgical procedures provide a more thorough drainage of the ductal system than pancreatic stent placement. This is especially true in the complex ductal arrangement of the head of the pancreas, where simple drainage of the duct or stent placement by endoscopy is unlikely to provide thorough drainage and relief of symptoms.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Chen, Yen-I., Mouen Khashab, Viviane Adam, Ge Bai, Vikesh Singh, Majidah Bukhari, Olaya Brewer Gutierrez, et al. "Plastic stents are more cost-effective than lumen-apposing metal stents in management of pancreatic pseudocysts." Endoscopy International Open 06, no. 07 (July 2018): E780—E788. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-0611-5082.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Background and study aims Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage is an effective and accepted primary modality for management of pancreatic pseudocyst (PP). A lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) has recently been developed specifically for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections which may be superior to using traditional plastic stents (PS) but is more expensive. Because use of a stent involves a risk of unplanned endoscopy, percutaneous drainage (PCD) and surgery, their costs should also be included in the comparison and a cost-effectiveness analysis of LAMS and PS should therefore be performed Patients and methods A decision tree was developed assessing both endoscopic drainage strategies for patients with PP: LAMS and PS over a 6-month time horizon. For each strategy, inpatients received a stent and were followed for subsequent need for direct further interventions or adverse events leading to unplanned endoscopy, PCD, surgery, or successful endoscopic drainage using probabilities obtained from the literature. The unit of effectiveness was successful endoscopic drainage without need for PCD or surgery. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results Success rates were 93.9 % for LAMS and 96.96 % for PS. Respective costs per successful drainage were US $ 18,129 (LAMS) and US $ 10,403 (PS). The LAMS strategy was thus characterized as dominated by the PS approach because it was costlier and less effective than PS. Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings. Conclusion Use of LAMS is not less effective and more costly than PS in management of patients with PP. As such, PS should be preferred over LAMS as initial management of these patients.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Park, Jae Keun, Jong Ho Moon, Yun Nah Lee, Seok jung Jo, Moon Han Choi, Tae Hoon Lee, Sang-Woo Cha, Young Deok Cho, and Sang-Heum Park. "Feasibility study of endoscopic biliary drainage under direct peroral cholangioscopy by using an ultra-slim upper endoscope (with videos)." Endoscopy International Open 09, no. 10 (September 16, 2021): E1447—E1452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1522-5615.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe therapeutic utility of peroral cholangioscopy (POC) is limited. Direct POC using an ultra‑slim upper endoscope expands the therapeutic indications because of its larger working channel, of up to 2.2 mm. We evaluated the feasibility of selective biliary drainage using a plastic stent under direct POC. From April 2015 to March 2019, biliary drainage under endoscopic visualization was performed in the same endoscopic session as direct POC without exchanging the duodenoscope. After guidewire insertion through the stricture or stone, a 5 Fr plastic stent and/or nasobiliary drainage catheter was used for biliary drainage. Selective biliary drainage under direct POC was performed in 32 patients, including 17 with difficult bile duct stones. Biliary drainage was performed with a plastic stent in 29 patients, nasobiliary drainage in one, and combined drainage in two patients. The technical success rate for biliary drainage placement under direct POC was 100 % (32/32). No significant procedure-related complications occurred. In conclusion, biliary drainage with a plastic stent or catheter under direct POC using an ultra-slim upper endoscope is feasible and may be useful for lesions obstructing the bile duct.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Kedia, Prashant, Reem Z. Sharaiha, Nikhil A. Kumta, Jessica Widmer, Armeen Jamal-Kabani, Kristen Weaver, Andrea Benvenuto, et al. "Endoscopic gallbladder drainage compared with percutaneous drainage." Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 82, no. 6 (December 2015): 1031–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2015.03.1912.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Chen, Gao-xiang, Cheng Li, and Hai Zhang. "Drainage During Endoscopic Thyroidectomy." JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 23, no. 1 (2019): e2018.00060. http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/jsls.2018.00060.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Song, Tae Jun, and Sang Soo Lee. "Endoscopic Drainage of Pseudocysts." Clinical Endoscopy 47, no. 3 (2014): 222. http://dx.doi.org/10.5946/ce.2014.47.3.222.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Roeder, Brent E., and Patrick R. Pfau. "Endoscopic Pancreatic Pseudocyst Drainage." Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 7, no. 4 (October 2005): 211–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tgie.2005.10.003.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Biswas, Arnab, Abraham Mathew, Charles E. Dye, Niraj J. Gusani, Eric Kimchi, and Kevin Staveley-O'Carroll. "Endoscopic Mediastinal Abscess Drainage." Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 69, no. 5 (April 2009): AB379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.03.1143.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Barnett, Jeffrey L. "Cholangitis and endoscopic drainage." Hepatology 16, no. 5 (November 1992): 1302–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hep.1840160529.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Shah, Jimil, and Surinder S. Rana. "Gall Bladder Drainage for Acute Cholecystitis in Surgically Unfit Patients: Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Transmural Drainage or Endoscopic Transpapillary Drainage!" Journal of Digestive Endoscopy 10, no. 03 (July 2019): 193–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3401442.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractAcute cholecystitis (AC) is a potentially serious condition that is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice of AC in surgically fit candidates. However, high-risk surgical patients with AC are a therapeutic dilemma. Various alternative treatment options available include percutaneous transhepatic cholecystostomy (PTC), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided gall bladder (GB) drainage or endoscopic transpapillary drainage of GB. Due to higher complication, unplanned hospital readmission rate, risk of tube dislodgement, and high risk of recurrent acute cholecystitis associated with PTC, endoscopic drainage GB is the preferred, minimally invasive treatment option. Both endoscopic transpapillary GB drainage as well as EUS-guided transmural drainage of GB are effective GB drainage options, but both of them have not been compared in terms of their efficacy and safety. In this news and views, we have discussed two interesting articles which have compared EUS-guided GB drainage and endoscopic transpapillary drainage.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Yamagishi, Fuminori, Mistuyosi Shimoda, Takashi Sakamoto, Kastunori Tauchi, Kastuo Shimada, Takeichi Goka, Tadashi Bandou, Masao Fujimaki, and Ademar Yamanaka. "Endoscopic Fenestration of Pseudo Cyst in Acute Pancreatitis." Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy 4, no. 3 (January 1, 1998): 155–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/dte.4.155.

Full text
Abstract:
We report a case of pseudo cyst accompanied by acute pancreatitis which was successfully treated by endoscopic cyst-gastrostomy. It had been enlarged recurrently after twice simple needle aspiration under ultrasonic monitoring. Because of the infection of the cyst, rapid and complete drainage was needed. Upper gastro-intestinal endoscopy showed a large bulge of the stomach which was compressed by paragastric pancreatic cyst. Endoscopic ultrasonography revealed that the cyst wall was attached hard with the stomach and there was no vessels between them. Endoscopic fenestration of the bulge was created using papillotome and diathermic snare. The drainage was effective and cyst was decompressed rapidly. The fenestration was closed after the cyst was diminished. Recently the endoscopic cyst-gastrostomy made by cutting linearly or inserting catheter have been reported, however, these treatments sometimes resulted in infection and relapse because of the quick closure of the fistula. When the bulge is large and endoscopic ultrasonogram revealed low bleeding risk, the fenestration may be advisable for effective drainage of longer duration without infection.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Nam, So Hye, Seung-Ho Baek, Dong Ryeol Yoo, Su Jin Choi, Joune Seup Lee, Dongwook Oh, and Myung-Hwan Kim. "Endoscopic Transpapillary Gallbladder Stenting for Acute Cholecystitis in a Patient with Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer." Korean Journal of Medicine 95, no. 1 (February 1, 2020): 43–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.3904/kjm.2020.95.1.43.

Full text
Abstract:
Percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage is an effective treatment for acute cholecystitis in poor surgical candidates. Endoscopic gallbladder drainage procedures, such as endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder drainage, endoscopic gallbladder stenting, and endoscopic naso-gallbladder drainage, have been used as alternative treatments for acute cholecystitis. These procedures are associated with increased patient comfort and physiologic drainage. We report a case of endoscopic gallbladder stenting for acute cholecystitis in a 62-year-old male undergoing chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer. After endoscopic gallbladder stenting, the patient’s acute cholecystitis resolved and he was able to undergo scheduled chemotherapy. The inserted double-pigtail plastic stent will be left in situ permanently. The choice of drainage modality for acute cholecystitis will generally be based on resources, patient preferences, local expertise, and clinical context.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Hallit, Rachel, Mélanie Calmels, Ulriikka Chaput, Diane Lorenzo, Aymeric Becq, Marine Camus, Xavier Dray, et al. "Endoscopic management of anastomotic leak after esophageal or gastric resection for malignancy: a multicenter experience." Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology 14 (January 2021): 175628482110328. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562848211032823.

Full text
Abstract:
Background: Most anastomotic leaks after surgical resection for esophageal or esophagogastric junction malignancies are treated endoscopically with esophageal stents. Internal drainage by double pigtail stents has been used for the endoscopic management of leaks following bariatric surgery, and recently introduced for anastomotic leaks after resections for malignancies. Our aim was to assess the overall efficacy of the endoscopic treatment for anastomotic leaks after esophageal or gastric resection for malignancies. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study in four digestive endoscopy tertiary referral centers in France. We included consecutive patients managed endoscopically for anastomotic leak following esophagectomy or gastrectomy for malignancies between January 2016 and December 2018. The primary outcome was the efficacy of the endoscopic management on leak closure. Results: Sixty-eight patients were included, among which 46 men and 22 women, with a mean ± SD age of 61 ± 11 years. Forty-four percent had an Ivor Lewis procedure, 16% a tri-incisional esophagectomy, and 40% a total gastrectomy. The median time between surgery and the diagnosis of leak was 9 (6–13) days. Endoscopic treatment was successful in 90% of the patients. The efficacy of internal drainage and esophageal stents was 95% and 77%, respectively ( p = 0.06). The mortality rate was 3%. The only predictive factor of successful endoscopic treatment was the initial use of internal drainage ( p = 0.002). Conclusion: Endoscopic management of early postoperative leak is successful in 90% of patients, preventing highly morbid surgical revisions. Internal endoscopic drainage should be considered as the first-line endoscopic treatment of anastomotic fistulas whenever technically feasible.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Igarashi, Yoshinori, and Yoshihiro Sakai. "Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic abscesses and pseudocysts: Endoscopic transpapillary drainage and endoscopic drainage guided by endosonography." Digestive Endoscopy 13, s1 (July 2001): S59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1443-1661.2001.0130s1s59.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Goenka, M. K., D. K. Bhasin, R. Kochhar, B. Nagi, U. Rungta, K. Das, and K. Singh. "Endoscopic Nasobiliary Drainage in the Management of Acute Cholangitis: An Experience in 143 Patients." Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy 3, no. 3 (January 1, 1997): 161–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/dte.3.161.

Full text
Abstract:
Acute cholangitis is associated with a high mortality and morbidity and often requires drainage of the obstructed biliary system. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness and safety of endoscopic nasobiliary drainage in the treatment and prevention of acute cholangitis due to diverse etiology. During a 32-month period, 143 patients (67 males, 76 females) with age range of 15 to 84 years underwent urgent fluoroscopy guided endoscopic nasobiliary drainage using a 7 Fr catheter either to treat acute cholangitis not responding to antibiotics (group A, n = 116) or to prevent its development following endoscopic retrograde cholangiography performed in an obstructed biliary system (group B, n = 27). Underlying etiology included bile duct stones (92), malignant biliary obstruction (34), choledochal cyst (4), chronic pancreatitis (4), ruptured hydatid cyst (3), portal hypertensive cholangiopathy (3) and liver abscess (3). Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage was performed successfully in 129 patients (90.2%). Cholangitis improved within 1 to 3 days (in group A) or did not develop (in Group B) in 125 patients (96.7%) with successful endoscopic nasobiliary drainage. Two patients however required additional drainage by percutaneous transhepatic route, while two died inspite of effective endoscopic drainage. Of the 14 patients (9.8%) with failed endoscopic drainage, 9 were managed by surgical decompression or percutaneous transhepatic drainage, 3 died of septicemia. Endoscopic nasobiliary drainage is a safe and effective method to treat patients with acute cholangitis as well as to prevent its development following cholangiography performed in an obstructed biliary system.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Liguory, Claude, Jean Francois Lefebvre, and Gary C. Vitale. "Endoscopic Drainage of Pancreatic Pseudocysts." Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology 4, no. 9 (1990): 568–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/1990/963419.

Full text
Abstract:
Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts was attempted in 17 patients over an eight year period. There were nine cysts located in the head of the pancreas, six in the body and two in the tail. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography was performed in all cases and the pancreatic duct satisfactorily opacified in 16 of the 17 patients. This study identified a communication with the pancreatic duct in seven cases. There were two cases in which multiple cysts were present; in each, one cyst was drained endoscopically and the others surgically. Endoscopic drainage of the cyst was immediately possible in 16 of 17 cases (94%). Late follow-up (mean 26 months) documented cyst disappearance in 11 cases (69%). None of the five patients with persistent cysts has required secondary surgical intervention, and the cysts are asymptomatic and stable or decreasing in size by serial scanning. There was one case (6%) in which a pseudocyst recurred following initial resolution. There were two complications (12%) requiring surgical intervention: gastrointestinal perforation with peritonitis in one patient and hemorrhage at the cyst margin from an arterial bleeder in another. There were no deaths at 30 days, but in one case a recurrent acute necrotizing pancrearitis occurred 36 days following endoscopic drainage and the patient died. This death was felt to be unrelated to the endoscopic procedure. In conclusion, internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts by endoscopic means can be proposed as an alternative to surgical drainage when the cyst can be identified as bulging into the stomach or duodenum. Immediate drainage is usually effective with a minimal long term recurrence rate.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Kahaleh, M., V. Shami, M. Conaway, J. Tokar, T. Rockoff, S. De La Rue, E. de Lange, et al. "Endoscopic Ultrasound Drainage of Pancreatic Pseudocyst: A Prospective Comparison with Conventional Endoscopic Drainage." Endoscopy 38, no. 4 (April 2006): 355–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-925249.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Ghazi, Ali, and Morris Washington. "Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Sphincterotomy, and Biliary Drainage." Surgical Clinics of North America 69, no. 6 (December 1989): 1249–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6109(16)44987-x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Chin, Yung Ka, and Ravishankar Asokkumar. "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of difficult-to-access liver abscesses." SAGE Open Medicine 8 (January 2020): 205031212092127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312120921273.

Full text
Abstract:
Objectives: Antibiotic therapy and percutaneous drainage have been the first-line treatments for liver abscesses. However, percutaneous drainage of abscesses may be challenging in difficult-to-access locations such as the caudate lobe. The aim of this review was to determine the indications, technical feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of difficult-to-access liver abscesses. Methods: A literature review of original articles, abstracts, case series and case reports describing endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver abscess drainage was performed. The indications, techniques and complications associated with endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage were reviewed. Results: A total of 15 studies were identified. The main indications were failed antibiotic therapy and difficulty in gaining percutaneous access. The technique involved identification and puncturing of an abscess under endoscopic ultrasound guidance followed by placement of a prosthesis via a guide wire. The technique was 97.5% successful with no major complications reported. Conclusion: Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage was feasible and safe and allowed complete drainage of liver abscesses not accessible by percutaneous drainage.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Dorrell, Robert, Swati Pawa, and Rishi Pawa. "Endoscopic Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections." Journal of Clinical Medicine 10, no. 2 (January 14, 2021): 284. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10020284.

Full text
Abstract:
Pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs) are a common sequela of pancreatitis. Most PFCs can be managed conservatively, but symptomatic PFCs require either surgical, percutaneous, or endoscopic intervention. Recent advances in the therapeutics of PFCs, including the step-up approach, endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage with lumen apposing metal stents, and direct endoscopic necrosectomy, have ushered endoscopy to the forefront of PFCs management and have allowed for improved patient outcomes and decreased morbidity. In this review, we explore the progress and future of endoscopic management of PFCs.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Artifon, Everson L. A., Flávio C. Ferreira, and Paulo Sakai. "Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Biliary Drainage." Korean Journal of Radiology 13, Suppl 1 (2012): S74. http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.s1.s74.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Tarantino, Ilaria. "Endoscopic ultrasound guided biliary drainage." World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 4, no. 7 (2012): 306. http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v4.i7.306.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Artifon, EversonL A. "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage." Endoscopic Ultrasound 2, no. 2 (2013): 61. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2303-9027.117687.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Almadi, Majid A., Nonthalee Pausawasdi, Thawee Ratanchuek, Anthony Yuen Bun Teoh, Khek Yu Ho, and Vinay Dhir. "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage." Gastrointestinal Intervention 5, no. 3 (October 31, 2016): 203–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.18528/gii150019.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Saumoy, Monica, Julie Yang, Amit Bhatt, Juan Carlos Bucobo, Vinay Chandrasekhara, Andrew P. Copland, Kumar Krishnan, et al. "Endoscopic therapies for gallbladder drainage." Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 94, no. 4 (October 2021): 671–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2021.05.031.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Nam, Hyeong Seok, and Dae Hwan Kang. "Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Biliary Drainage." Korean Journal of Gastroenterology 69, no. 3 (2017): 164. http://dx.doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2017.69.3.164.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Chavalitdhamrong, Disaya. "Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage." World Journal of Gastroenterology 18, no. 6 (2012): 491. http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v18.i6.491.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Chu, Po Cheng, Ava Anklesaria, Rabin Rahmani, Ian Wall, Nison Badalov, K. Iswara, JianJun Li, and Scott Tenner. "Endoscopic Intra-Peritoneal Abscess Drainage." American Journal of Gastroenterology 104 (October 2009): S225. http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/00000434-200910003-00602.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Sahel, J. "Endoscopic Drainage of Pancreatic Cysts." Endoscopy 23, no. 03 (May 1991): 181–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1010651.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Herth, Felix. "Endoscopic Drainage of Lung Abscesses*." CHEST Journal 127, no. 4 (April 1, 2005): 1378. http://dx.doi.org/10.1378/chest.127.4.1378.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Steger, P. H., P. Van der Spek, P. D’Haenens, M. De Man, and L. Lepoutre. "Endoscopic Drainage of Pancreatic Pseudocysts." Acta Clinica Belgica 48, no. 2 (January 1993): 124–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17843286.1993.11718297.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Salgado, Moses, and Laura Hetzler. "Endoscopic Drainage of Tornwaldt's Cyst." Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery 143, no. 2_suppl (August 2010): P277. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2010.06.597.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Cotton, PeterB. "ENDOSCOPIC DRAINAGE FOR SUPPURATIVE CHOLANGITIS." Lancet 334, no. 8656 (July 1989): 213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(89)90390-5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Kozarek, R. A., C. M. Brayko, J. Harlan, R. A. Sanowski, I. Cintora, and A. Kovac. "Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts." Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 31, no. 5 (October 1985): 322–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(85)72215-8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Itoi, Takao, Atsushi Sofuni, Fumihide Itokawa, Takayoshi Tsuchiya, Toshio Kurihara, Kentaro Ishii, Shujiro Tsuji, et al. "Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage." Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences 17, no. 5 (October 6, 2009): 611–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00534-009-0196-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Baron, Todd H. "Endoscopic Drainage of Pancreatic Pseudocysts." Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 12, no. 2 (September 29, 2007): 369–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11605-007-0334-5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Kozarek, R. A. "Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts." Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery 4, no. 1 (March 1997): 36–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01211342.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Herth, Felix, Armin Ernst, and Heinrich D. Becker. "Endoscopic Drainage of Lung Abscesses." Chest 127, no. 4 (April 2005): 1378–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0012-3692(15)34491-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

St. John, Jeffrey L., and Ali Nawras. "Endoscopic Drainage of Pancreatic Pseudocysts." American Journal of Gastroenterology 101 (September 2006): S104—S105. http://dx.doi.org/10.14309/00000434-200609001-00186.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Dohmoto, M., and K. D. Rupp. "Endoscopic drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts." Surgical Endoscopy 6, no. 3 (May 1992): 118–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02309082.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Prasad, Ganapathy A., and Shyam Varadarajulu. "Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Abscess Drainage." Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America 22, no. 2 (April 2012): 281–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giec.2012.04.002.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography