Books on the topic 'Elicitation of expert belief'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 37 books for your research on the topic 'Elicitation of expert belief.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse books on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
D, Diaper, ed. Knowledge elicitation: Principles, techniques, and applications. Chichester: E. Horwood, 1989.
Find full textAyyub, Bilal M. Elicitation of expert opinions for uncertainty and risks. Boca Raton, Fla: CRC Press, 2001.
Find full textKornfeld, Ari. Belief-network expert systems. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International, 1990.
Find full textDave, Hellens, ed. Knowledge elicitation: A practical handbook. New York: Prentice Hall, 1991.
Find full textSwackhamer, Deborah Liebl, and James K. Hammit. Review of EPA's Draft expert elicitation task force white paper. Washington, D.C: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of the Administrator, Science Advisory Board, 2010.
Find full textPeter, Gärdenfors, ed. Belief revision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Find full textGrdenfors, Peter. Belief Revision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Find full textWest, Daune. Towards a subjective knowledge elicitation methodology for the development of expert systems. Portsmouth: Portsmouth Polytechnic, School of Information Science, 1991.
Find full textJ, Bonano E., U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Division of High-Level Waste Management., Sandia National Laboratories, and Sandia Corporation, eds. Elicitation and use of expert judgement in performance assessment for high-level radioactive waste repositories. Washington, DC: Division of High-Level Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1990.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. Office of Technology Assessment. and Decision Science Consortium Inc, eds. Personalized decision analysis as an expert elicitation tool: An instructive experience in information security policy. [Washington, D.C.?]: The Office, 1985.
Find full textJ, Bonano Evaristo, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards. Division of High-Level Waste Management., Sandia National Laboratories, and Sandia Corporation, eds. Elicitation and use of expert judgement in performance assessment for high-level radioactive waste repositories. Washington, DC: Division of High-Level Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1990.
Find full textP, Kotra J., U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Division of Waste Management., and Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses (Southwest Research Institute), eds. Branch technical position on the use of expert elicitation in the high-level radioactive waste program. Washington, DC: Division of Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1996.
Find full textP, Kotra J., U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Division of Waste Management., and Center for Nuclear Waste Regulatory Analyses (Southwest Research Institute), eds. Branch technical position on the use of expert elicitation in the high-level radioactive waste program. Washington, DC: Division of Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1996.
Find full textLakemeyer, Gerhard. Models of belief for decidable reasoning in incomplete knowledge bases. Toronto: University of Toronto, Dept. of Computer Science, 1992.
Find full textBochman, Alexander. A Logical Theory of Nonmonotonic Inference and Belief Change. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001.
Find full textCorporation, Rand, and E-Vision 2000 (2000 : Washington, D.C.), eds. E-vision 2000: Key issues that will shape our energy future : summary of proceedings, scenario analysis, expert elicitation, and submitted papers. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2001.
Find full textKruse, Rudolf. Uncertainty and Vagueness in Knowledge Based Systems: Numerical Methods. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1991.
Find full textAyyub, Bilal M. Elicitation of Expert Opinions for Uncertainty and Risks. Taylor & Francis Group, 2001.
Find full textAyyub, Bilal M. Elicitation of Expert Opinions for Uncertainty and Risks. CRC Press, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420040906.
Full textAyyub, Bilal M. Elicitation of Expert Opinions for Uncertainty and Risks. CRC, 2001.
Find full textAyyub, Bilal M. Elicitation of Expert Opinions for Uncertainty and Risks. Taylor & Francis Group, 2001.
Find full textQuigley, John, Alec Morton, and Luis C. Dias. Elicitation: The Science and Art of Structuring Judgement. Springer, 2017.
Find full textQuigley, John, Alec Morton, and Luis C. Dias. Elicitation: The Science and Art of Structuring Judgement. Springer, 2018.
Find full textGärdenfors, Peter. Belief Revision. Cambridge University Press, 2011.
Find full textBranch technical position on the use of expert elicitation in the high-level radioactive waste program. Washington, DC: Division of Waste Management, Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1996.
Find full textNational Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Staff. Development of an Expert Judgement Elicitation and Calibration Methodology for Risk Analysis in Conceptual Vehicle Design. Independently Published, 2018.
Find full textA Logical Theory of Nonmonotonic Inference and Belief Change (Artificial Intelligence). Springer, 2001.
Find full textLakemeyer, Gerhard. Models of belief for decidable reasoning in incomplete knowledge bases. 1990.
Find full textCorporation, RAND. E-Vision 2000, Key Issues That Will Shape Our Energy Future: Summary of Proceedings, Scenario Analysis, Expert Elicitation, and Submitted Papers. RAND Corporation, 2001.
Find full textMethods for the elicitation and use of expert opinion in risk assessment: Phase I, a critical evaluation and directions for future research. Washington, DC: Division of Reactor Accident Analysis, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1987.
Find full textTebaldi, Claudia, and Richard Smith. Indirect elicitation from ecological experts: From methods and software to habitat modelling and rock-wallabies. Edited by Anthony O'Hagan and Mike West. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198703174.013.19.
Full textGinsburg, Kenneth R., and Sara B. Kinsman, eds. Reaching Teens. American Academy of Pediatrics, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1542/9781581108347.
Full textDavidson, Jane W., and Gary E. McPherson. Learning to perform. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199346677.003.0002.
Full textRobinson, Anthony, David Ruebain, and Susie Uppal, eds. Blackstone's Guide to the Equality Act 2010. 4th ed. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198870876.001.0001.
Full textHeer, Paul J. Mr. X and the Pacific. Cornell University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501711145.001.0001.
Full textBrontë, Anne. The Tenant of Wildfell Hall. Edited by Herbert Rosengarten and Josephine McDonagh. Oxford University Press, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/owc/9780199207558.001.0001.
Full textDavidson, Judith. Qualitative Research and Complex Teams. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190648138.001.0001.
Full text