Journal articles on the topic 'Elections Indonesia'
To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Elections Indonesia.
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Elections Indonesia.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Yusdar, Yusdar. "AMBIVALENSI PENGATURAN PEMILIHAN UMUM DI INDONESIA." Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum dan Politik Islam 4, no. 1 (July 31, 2019): 21–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.35673/ajmpi.v4i1.216.
Full textAbstract:
This study aims to understand the ambivalence of organizing elections in Indonesia so that they can conceptualize the ideal setting for conducting general elections with integrity. This research is normative legal research (normative legal research). This research was conducted by examining primary legal material and secondary legal material.The results of the study indicate that the regulation of elections used in the administration of elections in Indonesia only emphasizes the regulation of procedural aspects. Whereas the indicators of the success of the election if the election organizers, election participants and the public as voters carry out the stages of the election in accordance with the rules of the election stage even though they set aside substantial aspects. Therefore, arrangements are needed in the administration of elections that emphasize substantial aspects, so that elections with integrity can be realized.
2
Salim, Hardy, and Cut Memi. "KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM MENGADILI PERKARA PERSELISIHAN HASIL PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH (SUATU KAJIAN TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 97/PUU-XI/2013 JO. PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 072-073/PUU-II/2004)." Jurnal Hukum Adigama 1, no. 2 (January 21, 2019): 570. http://dx.doi.org/10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2847.
Full textAbstract:
Acccording to the Arrticle 24C paragaaph (1) the Constttution of thr Republic of Indonesia of 1945, the Constitutional Court of thr Republic of Indonesia have thr power to decide upon disputes over the results of general election. The general election referred to here is elections to elect members of the legislature, regional representative councils, regional legislatures, president amd vice president. Both of thr provisions have been limitative, so there will no be any other elections that included. However, in its development, the Constittutional Court of the Republc of Indonesia is given the power to decide upon disputes ovrr the results of regional hed elections with a legal basis of the Constittutional Court Ruling Number 072-073/PUU-II/2004. However, a litle later the Constttution Court of the Republic of Indonesia issued a Consttttuional Court Ruling Number 97/PUU-XI/2013 which said tht the Constitusional Court of the Republic of Indonesia can’t have the power to decide upon disputes over the resuls of regional hed elections. This reaises problems regarding whether regional head elections are included in thr general election regime? And whether the Constitutional Court of the Republic Indonesia has thr authorty to decide upon disputes over the results of regional hed elections? Thr Author examined the issue by normative method. The results of thr resrarch show tht thr regional hesd elections is not a part of the general electiins regime and the Constututional Corrt of the Republic Indonesia can’t have thr power to decide upon disputes ovrr thr resulls of the regional hesd elections.
3
Syafei, Muhammad, and Muhammad Rafi Darajati. "Design of General Election in Indonesia." LAW REFORM 16, no. 1 (March 27, 2020): 97–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.14710/lr.v16i1.30308.
Full textAbstract:
The 2019 general elections in Indonesia have been held differently from the previous period. The 2019 general elections held simultaneously five boxes. This article discusses how the implementation of the 2019 general election and how the rather election should be carried out in the future. The author concludes that the implementation of simultaneous general elections in 2019 caused tremendous complexity for participants, voters, and organizers. The complexity and constraints that occur make the selection process not run well and less efficient and effective time spent. Then for the coming period, the elections should be carried out using the design of simultaneous national elections and simultaneous regional elections. In the simultaneous national election, it held to elect the President and Vice President, members of the House of People’s Representative, and members of the Regional Representative Board. Then in the simultaneous regional election, it held to elect the Governor, Regent/ Mayor, Provincial Legislative Council, and Regency/ City Legislative Council.
4
Orien Effendi. "Euforia Pemilu Legislatif, Pilpres Dan Pemilukada Serentak Di Indonesia." Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam 8, no. 2 (December 1, 2021): 57–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.32505/politica.v8i2.3544.
Full textAbstract:
Euphoria of the Legislative Election, Presidential Election and Regional Head Election Simultaneously in Indonesia. Since the collapse of the New Order government in 1998, the enthusiasm of the Indonesian people in welcoming the atmosphere of the birth of the first democratic system by holding direct elections has been great. Through direct elections at that time began the election of the president and vice president elected by the people for the first time. The direct election by the people also applies to elections at the regional level which include the election of regional heads. Meanwhile, in the course of history, legislative elections have been held long before starting in 1955, so that it is recorded that legislative elections have been held 12 (twelve) times since they were held for the first time until their implementation in 2019. Along the way, the legislative, presidential and post-conflict local elections showed high enthusiasm in facing various challenges in each election period. So that the Indonesian people continue to learn from history and improve all deficiencies which then produce maturity in democracy. By reviewing the literature, this paper tries to review events related to the spirit or euphoria of the election.
5
Nafiah, Aniqotun, and Nur Azizah Hidayat. "COVID-19 Pandemic and Simultaneous Regional Head Elections in Indonesia." Indonesian Journal of Law and Society 2, no. 2 (September 30, 2021): 145. http://dx.doi.org/10.19184/ijls.v2i2.24661.
Full textAbstract:
The COVID-19 pandemic hurts almost all sectors, particularly the government, like the simultaneous Regional Head Election. The Indonesian government, along with the General Election Commission and the Indonesian House of Representatives through the Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 2 of 2020, agreed to postpone it until December 2020 to reduce the spread of COVID-19. To date, the pandemic has not ended yet, considered that the delay might be ineffective. Another issue was the emergence of other simultaneous elections in 2024, in which several steps have begun to be implemented this year. This study aimed to discuss the issue of the simultaneous regional head elections during the pandemic. It raised two issues. First, while the elections were still held to avoid vacancies, their implementation must be adjusted to the COVID-19 pandemic. Second, while the elections were postponed until the pandemic ends, the Acting Officer, as another alternative, should be given full authority to the Acting Officer so that the government could be administered optimally. The study combined doctrinal and empirical legal research. The primary data sources were the laws and regulations relating to the Regional Head Elections in Indonesia and interviews from the Election Supervisory Committee in Surabaya, Indonesia. This study showed that the simultaneous elections during the COVID-19 pandemic could still avoid vacancies, and its implementation was adjusted to the pandemic situation. Therefore, it implemented strict health protocols despite the more detailed and comprehensive-time simulations to adjust the overall implementation of the upcoming election stages. Also, the internet infrastructure was prevalent to support the elections. Finally, the government established the guidelines for Regional Head Election based on the COVID-19 health protocol.
KEYWORDS: COVID-19 Pandemic, Regional Head Election, Regional Head Authority.
6
Rannie, Mahesa. "LEGAL REGULATIONS FOR THE GENERAL ELECTION SYSTEM IN INDONESIA FROM THE 1955 ELECTION TO THE CONCURRENT ELECTION OF 2019." Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari'ah dan Masyarakat 20, no. 2 (December 31, 2020): 247–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v20i2.6927.
Full textAbstract:
Throughout its history, Indonesia has held general elections many times from 1955 to 2019. During that long period of time, Indonesia implemented a different electoral system at each election. The arrangement of the electoral system in Indonesia always changes from time to time in each election administration. In the process of changing the laws and the regulations for every election, there has always been legal political dynamics. After the 2014 elections, there have been changes regarding the conduct of elections in Indonesia. The Constitutional Court (MK) granted the petition for a judicial review of Law Number 42 of 2008 concerning the Election of President and Vice President in 2014, so that the implementation of elections in Indonesia entered a new phase in 2019 and beyond. In 2019, for the first time Indonesia held simultaneous elections. The methodology used in this study is normative. The approaches used in this study are the historical approach, the statute approach, the legal analysis approach, and the conceptual approach. Legal arrangements regarding the conduct of elections always change, starting from the highest level of legislative regulations to the lowest (from the laws to the General Election Commission regulations, presidential decrees, ministerial regulations, or other regulations). The changes in the regulations regarding the implementation of elections in Indonesia have been present since the time of the 1955 elections until the 2019 elections. Since the implementation of the 1955 elections, Indonesia has always practiced a proportional electoral system, the electoral system that is considered suitable to be applied in Indonesia. This proportional electoral system is practiced with various modifications (both the open proportional electoral system and the closed proportional system). There are even district elements in the proportional electoral system in Indonesia, for example there are electoral districts that can be equated with districts in the district electoral system. The practice of the electoral system to be used in the elections in Indonesia is almost always subject to debate, both among constitutional law intellectuals and politics.
7
Ansori, Mhd. "Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia." Wajah Hukum 3, no. 1 (April 30, 2019): 74. http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v3i1.57.
Full textAbstract:
The realization of democracy in Indonesia is one of which is carried out by general elections, this is a political contestation which often present disputes.There is a general understanding that effective electoral dispute resolution mechanisms and processes are a “sine qua non” for fair and fair elections.As well as the implementation of the general election system is designed in there is alwayas a possibility of violations that can reduce the quality of general elections, for that as well as the implementation of the general election system, within it is always available a trusted istitutional mechanism to resolve various types of general election objections and disputes.Disputes or disputes can be divided into two, that is (1) disputes in the electoral process (especially those that occur between participants in the general election or between candidates) which have been handled by the election supervisory committee and election results disputes or disputes. This paper aims to find out and analyze the dispute resolution of elections in Indonesia.The type of research used is normative juridical research, using conceptual approach, legislation approach, and historical approach
8
Wardana, Dodi Jaya. "Konsep Pengadilan Khusus Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Pemilihan Kepala Daerah di Indonesia." Jurnal Justiciabelen 3, no. 1 (February 1, 2021): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.30587/justiciabelen.v3i1.2241.
Full textAbstract:
A special court for the settlement of regional head election cases needs to be established / held for the settlement of cases for regional head elections and this special court is established before the implementation of regional head elections simultaneously nationally. This special court for regional head elections is nothing new, but something that already exists. Moreover, this special election court has been implemented in Uruguay. The authority of the Election Court in Uruguay appears to be very broad, covering everything related to elections, from the making of the regulations, the implementation, to the settlement of the case. The form and design of the special election court institutions must be adapted to the conditions of the temporary (ad hoc) Indonesian state under the Supreme Court and has the authority to handle all cases that arise in the election process, ranging from administrative cases and election crimes to disputes over results. Regional elections.
9
Tawakkal, George Towar Ikbal, Irma Fitriana Ulfah, Andi Setiawan, Andrew D. Garner, and Thomas R. Seitz. "WHEN DIFFERENT ELECTIONS HAVE DIFFERENT SALIENCIES FOR VOTERS: MOST IMPORTANT AND CONSIDERATION (EVIDENCE FROM INDONESIAN VOTERS)." Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 8, no. 4 (August 27, 2020): 625–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2020.8462.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose of the study: Generally, the purpose of this study is to explain the salience of each form of election for voters. To explain that, this study examines which election is perceived as the most important election for voters, and what matters are considered by voters in each election, especially in the most important election and money politics.
Methodology: The data are drawn from a survey of 800 respondents in Central Java during the 2019 Indonesian elections. The survey asked two questions; which election they perceive as the most important election ("what is the most important election for you?"), and what matters they consider when voting for a candidate ("what is your consideration in each election?"). The dataset also includes variables related to money politics.
Main Findings: Voters have different importances and considerations in various forms of elections. More voters see the executive election as the most important than the legislative election in every level of election. More voters consider the program in the legislative elections, while more voters consider the figure of candidates in the executive elections. But in more detail, there are various patterns.
Applications of this study: Referring to the number of elections in Indonesia, this finding can help the government, electoral commission, or activists to develop better strategies for educating citizens. Also, referring to the widespread money politics in Indonesia, this finding can help them to improve participation and reduce money politics in elections, especially at local levels.
Novelty/Originality of this study: Many scholars who talked about the meaning of election or the Importance of election do not explain clearly the possibility of voters having different meanings for different elections, while a voter faces several elections for different positions. This article fills in the literature explanation by discussing the level of elections when understanding the meaning of elections for voters.
10
Yani, Ahmad. "Penataan Pemilihan Kepala Desa dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan di Indonesia." Jurnal Konstitusi 19, no. 2 (June 2, 2022): 456. http://dx.doi.org/10.31078/jk1929.
Full textAbstract:
The current political and legal configuration of the village head election organizing institution is not yet in accordance with election governance with integrity. This happens because the institutional structure is not well ordered. This research examines the problem of legal regulation of the structure of the village head election institution, and looks for the ideal framework for the organization to organize the village head election in the future. The research method used is normative and doctrinal legal research method which is carried out by analyzing positive legal norms. Data collection techniques are carried out by reviewing applicable laws and regulations, books and other literature. The results showed that the legal arrangements for village head election organizers through related regulations led to many institutional structures for village head elections so that the funding for village head elections would be expensive. The idea of an ideal framework for an organizing institution for village head elections in the future can be done by shifting the model of the village head election organizing institution from a government model to an independent model. The application of this model can be done through a legislative or executive review of regulations related to village head elections, and at least including the KPU as the organizing agency for village head elections.
11
Ginting, Fuad Putra Perdana, and Anwar Saragih. "Ilusi Demokrasi Substansial di Indonesia: Sebuah Kritik Terhadap Impementasi Parliamentary Treshlod." Politeia: Jurnal Ilmu Politik 10, no. 2 (December 25, 2018): 79–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.32734/politeia.v10i2.630.
Full textAbstract:
This study raises a discussion about the Illusion of Substantial Democracy in Indonesia: A Criticism of the Implementation of Theshold's Parliamentary. Since the 2009 general election. Indonesia has begun to introduce a parliamentary threshold system (Parliamentary Theshold) which sets a 2.5% threshold. Then in the next election, the 2014 election rose to 3.5% in the spirit of simplifying the number of parties in parliament. However, in fact this did not happen. Because, the number of political parties resulting from the 2009 elections which were 9 parties actually increased to 10 parties in the 2014 election. There were other problems in the electoral system using Theshold Parliamentary. As in the 2009 elections there were 29 political parties whose voices were lost due to this system, then in the 2014 elections there were 2 political parties who also lost votes due to the threshold system. Of course, as a democracy the people must know where the voice is. Is the system of implementing the Theshold Parliamentary system in the Indonesian elections in line with the essence of substantial democracy? The results of this study indicate the parliamentary threshold system has an impact on the loss of the voice of small parties, transactional presidential elections and the parliamentary threshold limiting democratic rights. Indonesia needs an electoral system that is honest, free, high-quality, transparent and represents the wishes of the majority of Indonesia's ractates
12
Ridwan Arifin. "INTEGRATED LAW ENFORCEMENT (GAKKUMDU) IN MANAGING GENERAL ELECTIONS IN INDONESIA." Madani Legal Review 3, no. 1 (December 5, 2019): 63–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.31850/malrev.v3i1.345.
Full textAbstract:
The number of general elections in Indonesia, such as in regional head elections, leagislative elections and in the election of president and vice president. In general elections, the president and vice president are often referred to as legislative elections, while the head of the region itself has the title, namely regional head elections only. The proverb says that where there is a rule there will be an offense. Therefore, to avoid any undesirable things, an improvement is needed to deal with this. In order to avoid fraud, in the improvement there is certainly an institution that regulates, namely from the law apparatus, as an apparatus in law enforcement is required to be able to ensure the existence of violations in the implementation of elections only because solely to enforce integrated law. In fact, the general election is always interesting so that it can be investigated, which is contained in the rules, implementation, and in the participants and the community. It certainly determines the success of the general election. If the rules are already felt or considered to be good in its implementation without capable law enforcement so that it will be difficult also in its realization. Good rules and good law enforcers also cannot maximize if the people themselves are ignorant and do not care about existing regulations. So, order between the three of them bound each other. In general elections it does not only involve one or two people, but requires a lot of people, so that the community is required to participate in issuing their opinions. But with so many parties participating in the election, there were many violations of the implementation, for example in 2014, where there were still many violations in general elections. Whereas at that time there was a socialization of the implementation of the general election which was socialized by the KPU and Bawaslu, not only socialization but also from the Bawaslu and its staff who participated in efforts to prevent the occurrence of violations in general elections. Although in the end socialization in prevention still cannot reduce the number of violations that exist. In dealing with this problem the creation of a system can reduce violations during the election, namely the process of synergy of Gakkumdu with the aim of realizing democratic elections in 2019 in the hope that it can provide the effect of clarity and change in carrying out general elections
13
Butt, Simon, and Fritz Siregar. "Multilayered Oversight: Electoral Administration in Indonesia." Asian Journal of Comparative Law 16, S1 (December 2021): S121—S135. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2021.32.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractElectoral administration in Indonesia is complex. The Electoral Commission (Komisi Pemilihan Umum) is responsible for planning and running five-yearly elections for one national and two regional legislatures, and one additional national regional representative body, as well as direct presidential, gubernatorial, mayoral and regent elections. Because candidates and parties often have significant financial stakes in their outcome, these elections are hotly contested and the results quite commonly disputed, including in Indonesia's Constitutional Court (Mahkamah Konstitusi). Electoral contestants often point to mistakes in administration and vote counting, which appear to be natural consequences of the great logistical challenges these elections present. For example, on 17 April, 2019, well over 150 million citizens attended one of over 800,000 polling stations to vote for candidates to fill 19,817 legislative seats in national and subnational parliaments. Many of these elections are said to be marred by attempts by candidates and their parties to gain illegal advantage, whether through misuse of incumbency or vote buying. There is also said to be much potential for corruption amongst electoral administrators themselves in registering candidates, verifying parties, procuring equipment for polling stations, and counting and tallying votes on election day. Given the potential of mistakes and illegality to jeopardise the legitimacy of election results, lawmakers in Indonesia have created multi-layered oversight mechanisms to oversee the planning and running of the elections by the Electoral Commission, as well as to oversee the Election Supervisory Board (Bawaslu, Badan Pengawas Pemilihan Umum) itself, which is charged with supervising that Commission. This article examines the work and performance of these institutions, and the Electoral Administration Honour Council (DKPP, or Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu), which hears allegations of breaches by the Commission and the Board.
14
Tjenreng, Muhammad Baharuddin Zubakhrum. "Democratic System Strengthening Through Concurrent Election Implementation To Improve Political Stability and National Development." Journal of Social and Development Sciences 7, no. 2 (July 6, 2016): 44–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.22610/jsds.v7i2.1306.
Full textAbstract:
Indonesian recently held a regional head concurrent elections in the first phase on December 9, 2015. Concurrent elections has been a historic moment for Indonesia to elect regional heads organized and structured massively. Concurrent election significance for Indonesian politics, especially at the local level, not only to read limited local democratic party, but rather an instrument for strengthening the democratic process. This research seeks to examine and analyze the democracy strengthening through concurrent election implementation in order to improve political stability of national development. In carrying out this study, researchers using qualitative methods. Whereabout the main data from this study is the researchers observation result on the concurrent election day, which is supported by several secondary data from the media. Featured models concurrent election (local concurrent election) is believed to be the best solution to counter the problems remaining in the elections execution, especially in two important reasons: First, the elections implementation effectiveness in order to realize the elections are more qualified and dignified from both the process and elections outcome aspects; second, the elections efficiency especially from the budget efficiency aspect which must be issued by the state to finance the electoral process.
15
Fikri, Sultoni, Idzhati Fitri Nabilah, Ika Sistia Wulan Sari, and Tio Fernida Siregar. "PERBANDINGAN PEMILIHAN UMUM PRESIDEN DI INDONESIA DENGAN KOREA SELATAN." Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum 14, no. 1 (July 7, 2022): 78. http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v14i1.309.
Full textAbstract:
The purpose of writing this journal is to find out where the differences and similarities between the presidential election system are in 2 (two) countries, namely Indonesia and South Korea. The focus of the questions in this journal is: how is the general election system implemented in Indonesia and South Korea (which includes explaining the history, system and mechanism of general elections in Indonesia and South Korea as well as, what are the differences in the presidential election system that used by Indonesia and South Korea. The research in this journal uses a normative juridical approach where the reference in writing is the legal basis of 2 (two) countries namely Indonesia and South Korea, in Indonesia the general election system uses the constitutional basis of the Constitution The Republic of Indonesia in 1945, Law Number 42 of 2008 concerning General Elections for President and Vice President, Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections, while South Korea uses the Constitution of the Republic of Korea [Hangul: Daehanmingug Heonbeob]. So in s conclude that in writing this journal there are similarities and differences in the history, mechanisms, regulations, systems of the general elections of Indonesia and South Korea.
16
Biroroh, Ta’mirotul. "Optimizing The Role of the General Election Commission in Realizing Democratic Elections in Indonesia." International Journal of Law and Politics Studies 3, no. 2 (November 29, 2021): 29–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.32996/ijlps.2021.3.2.5.
Full textAbstract:
The mechanism for transferring people's sovereignty is carried out through general elections to elect leaders and representatives of the people who will be mandated to carry out state and government affairs in accordance with the provisions contained in the legislation. One of the interesting developments from the point of view of the Indonesian state administration began when Indonesia experienced a transitional period of general elections (elections) which are one of the main pillars of democracy. In Indonesia, the existence of an election management body has existed since the 1955 general election until now. In every course of political history, Indonesia has several different institutional models of election management from time to time. The General Election Commission in Indonesia it is called Komisi Pemilihan Umum (KPU) is an institution that carries out the function of organizing elections in Indonesia. In addition to the KPU, there are institutions that also play an important role in the implementation of elections and are closely related to the existence of the KPU, namely survey institutions that carry out quick count processes. The survey institutions in a number of developing countries, especially those that are actively building democracy, are also not a little doubted by their moral honesty, at least being sued with a critical attitude such as the existence of a poll on the existence of a political survey institution, which has resulted in an attitude of uncertainty about the performance survey agency. This condition makes people less confident in the survey results which are considered no longer independent. It is proven that every time an election is held, a number of survey institutions seem to want to lead public opinion towards certain contestants. This is certainly very unfortunate considering that the survey results are one of the important instruments in democracy.
17
Madril, Oce. "THE AUTHORITY OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURT IN SETTLING THE DISPUTES OVER ELECTION PROCESS IN INDONESIA." Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 8, no. 3 (February 2, 2020): 365. http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v8i3.35553.
Full textAbstract:
<em>Indonesia is a country that provides constitutional guarantees over the principle of popular sovereignty. A manifestation of the principle of popular sovereignty is through the holding of a General Election. To safeguard the implementation of fair and democratic elections, laws and regulations concerning elections are made by the government. One of the principles of fair and democratic elections is the availability of legal mechanisms to resolve election disputes. The Indonesian Election Law already has these rules. One mechanism for resolving election disputes is through state administrative courts. This research focuses on discussing the development of the authority of the State Administrative Court (PTUN) in resolving disputes over the Election process. The PTUN has long been established in Indonesia, but the authority of the PTUN in resolving election disputes is a new authority expressly granted by the post-reform election law. This study also discussing two PTUN decisions. The decisions show how electoral law is applied in the practice, which is sometimes not always the same as what is expected by legislators.</em>
18
Firmanto, Taufik, Moh Fadli, Muchamad Ali Safaat, and Istislam Istislam. "Estudo de comparação institucional para solução de controvérsias para eleições de chefes regionais na Indonésia e no Brasil." Research, Society and Development 9, no. 11 (December 8, 2020): e94091110776. http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i11.10776.
Full textAbstract:
This article is a legal research which conducts a comparative study of the dispute resolution institutions between the Indonesian and Brazilian elections. The purpose of writing this article is to map the similarities and differences in the practice of dispute resolution between regional head elections in Indonesia and Brazil to take good aspects that are suitable for implementation in Indonesia. In the discussion, it also covers the practice of organizing elections, election management organs and institutions, including the practice of dispute resolution for Election / Pilkada in both countries. The research method used is normative legal research using primary legal materials in the form of statutory regulations and court decisions, using a comparative approach, a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Conclusions from the discussion of the research results, the authors propose two institutional options for Pilkada dispute resolution in Indonesia: a) Establishing a special election / election court under the PTUN environment. This Special Judiciary is domiciled in each provincial capital to adjudicate and decide on election result disputes (Election / Pilkada Crime and also examine and adjudicate election / election / election process / administration disputes), or b) Define the authority of the Constitutional Court of Justice to adjudicate disputes over the results of the Pilkada (in addition to PHPU) without any differentiation of regime.
19
Maemunah, Maemunah. "Voting Results Concurrent Election in Indonesia in 2019." CIVICUS : Pendidikan-Penelitian-Pengabdian Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan 8, no. 2 (October 12, 2020): 46. http://dx.doi.org/10.31764/civicus.v8i2.2860.
Full textAbstract:
Dalam konteks Indonesia yang sedang membangun peradaban politik yang sehat, penyelenggaraan pemilu tanpa kehadiran pengawasan struktural dan fungsional yang intens berpotensi mengakibatkan hilangnya hak pilih warga negara, bangkitnya politik uang, kampanye hitam, dan pemilu. yang tidak sesuai aturan. Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui hasil pemungutan suara pemilu serentak di Indonesia tahun 2019. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif analitik. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian menunjukkaan bahwa pelaksanaan pemilu serentak merupakan sejarah baru di Indonesia karena pelaksanaan secara serentak mulai pemilihan cadidat tiangkat pusat hingga daerah. Adanya pemilu serentak ini dapat memberikan catatan baru bila dibandingkan dengan pemilu sebelumnya, pemilu serentak ini menghasilkan beberapa hal penting terhadap pemilu Indonesia yaitu dapat mengefisiensi anggaran dana, partisipasi partai politik secara ketat, partisipasi peserta pemilu dan menghasilkan calon presdient dan wakil presiden, anggota legislative dan dewan perwakilan daerah yang terpilih sesuai pilihan rakyat.In the sense of Indonesia which is building a stable democratic civilization, it is possible to hold elections without intensive institutional and functional oversight that can result in the erosion of the rights of people to vote, an increase in money policy, black campaigns and elections. The rules don't suit. The goal of this paper is to determine the outcome of the 2019 simultaneous elections in Indonesia. This research uses an analytical-descriptive approach. The results show that the conduct of concurrent elections is a new history in Indonesia because the success begins at the same time from election of central to regional candidates. The simultaneous election will provide new records compared with previous elections, which will produce many critical elements in the Indonesian elections, namely the ability to simplify the budget, tight political party membership, participation of electoral participants and the presidential and vice-presidential candidates, parliamentarians and members of the Parliament.
20
Martinus, Handy. "Analisis Perubahan Partai Politik Pemenang Pemilu di Indonesia." Humaniora 4, no. 2 (October 31, 2013): 866. http://dx.doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v4i2.3516.
Full textAbstract:
By three elections in Indonesia, the pattern seen is a change in a very significant political force. It changed not only the party in the first position, but also a different party: three elections produced three different parties that received the most votes. Major political changes in Indonesia have been coloring since the reformation in 1998. The first change occurred in the 1999 election. PDIP evicted Golkar that has ruled for more than 30 years claiming an absolute majority. Then in the 2004 election, the strength of the party with the most votes moved to Golkar. In 2009, a major change occurred again. Top position was taken by Democrats. This article is a study using secondary data from a survey conducted by the Indonesian Survey Institute (LSI) during the period 1 to 12 February 2012 with the population of all Indonesian citizens who have the rights to vote in elections when the survey was conducted. Number of samples taken ranged up to 2,050. Based on the sample, it is estimated margin of error of + / -2.2% at the 95% confidence level. It is concluded that the political change will continue in the 2014 election along with the negative sentiments from Indonesian people against politics and law enforcement today. Election results earlier in some parts of Indonesia showed a progressive trend increasing number of non-voters and swing voters. NasDem and Gerindra are quite prominent in voter mobilization through the air via mass media. Both attract Democrats’ swing voters whom are middle-class which are more intensively following the national news.
21
Agang, Muhammad Ilham. "EFEKTIFITAS LEMBAGA SENTRA PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERPADU (GAKUMDU) DALAM MENEGAKKAN KEADILAN PEMILU." JURNAL AKTA YUDISIA 4, no. 1 (October 31, 2019): 23–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.35334/ay.v4i1.1025.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Elections are a tangible form of the concept of democracy which is believed to be one form of carrying out government through a "Party" Democracy which should be a party of people who rejoice and have high expectations of the simultaneous election implementation in 2019. Gakumdu as an integrated law enforcement center has an important role in handling election criminal acts. In Article 486 point (1) of Law No. 7 of 2017 explicitly explained the establishment of Gakkumdu intends to equalize the understanding and pattern of handling election criminal acts by the Bawaslu, the Indonesian National Police, and the Attorney General's Office of the Republic of Indonesia. The Gakkumdu members themselves come from the Indonesian National Police and prosecutors from the Indonesian Attorney General's Office.In this paper the central issue is the effectiveness of the integrated Law Enforcement Center (Gakkumdu) in handling every election crime that occurs in each stage of the 2019 General Elections, including seeing what are the problems faced by the Gakkumdu center and what efforts are being made to strengthen the Gakkumdu center.The holding of elections conducted in Indonesia, evidently the procedures and mechanism of elections also influence changes in behavior of both participants, implementers, organizing elections as well as several government and judicial institutions. As for the objects of the formulation of election criminal offenses as formulated in Law Number 7 of 2017 Concerning General Elections, which are classified in line with several qualifications of actions, such as: Criminal acts aimed at everyone, Criminal acts that can be carried out by KPU officers, KPU Province, Regency / City KPU, PPK, PPS and PPLN, made in crimes aimed at implementing the campaign, Criminal acts aimed at election participants proven to receive donations and / or assistance, Criminal acts aimed at state officials / government officials and judicial institutions , Criminal acts aimed at ballot printing companies.
22
Ashfiya, Dzikry Gaosul. "Desain Ulang Konsep Penegakan Hukum Pemilu di Indonesia dalam Kerangka Pemilu Demokratis dan Berkeadilan." Jurnal Kajian Konstitusi 1, no. 1 (June 15, 2021): 33. http://dx.doi.org/10.19184/jkk.v1i1.23792.
Full textAbstract:
The enforcement process of electoral law needs to be simplified by proposing the single authority granted to a special election court. This is because the segmentation of electoral law enforcement into several law enforcement agencies has not been able to guarantee legal certainty and enforce election justice. This article aims to revisit the various problems in segmenting election law enforcement and their implications for the quality of election administration in Indonesia. It offers an ideal concept of electoral law enforcement within the framework of democratic and fair elections. This article shows that election law problems and the concept of law enforcement which have been segmented into several categories with various settlement mechanisms and law enforcement agencies often only cause overlapping authorities and decisions between judicial institutions and still allow for a legal vacuum so that it has negative implications for the quality of elections in Indonesia. Consequently, it is necessary to revamp the concept of electoral law enforcement by simplifying and redesigning its law enforcement agencies, one of which is to strengthen the idea of a special election court body. This is seen as the ideal concept of law enforcement for elections in Indonesia within the framework of democratic and fair elections.
Keywords: Elections, Election Law Enforcement, Democratic and Fair Elections.
23
Gusman, Delfina. "Mengkaji Ulang Gagasan Pengadilan Khusus Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia." Nagari Law Review 3, no. 2 (April 28, 2020): 70. http://dx.doi.org/10.25077/nalrev.v.3.i.2.p.70-83.2020.
Full textAbstract:
General elections are a means of democracy to elect leaders who will carry out the wheels of government for a certain period of time, through legitimate power transfer procedures by involving public participation. Elections are the crystallization of popular sovereignty in procedural mechanisms. But often in the implementation of procedural democracy this is followed by fraudulent actions that tarnish the true nature of democracy (substantial democracy). Therefore, we need a law enforcement agency for every action that can damage the essential meaning of democracy and elections in Indonesia. The idea of a special court emerged as an alternative to electoral dispute resolution in the study of Indonesian constitutional law, however this idea needs to be discussed in more depth from various aspects to see its relevance to the Indonesian constitutional system, given that long before there was the idea of a special election court, Indonesia already had a number of institutions that given a mandate and authority to resolve disputes related to elections. This paper uses normative juridical methods in its study and is supported by secondary data in the form of primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The analysis used is qualitative analysis. The results of the study revealed that the idea of establishing an electoral special court was the idea of state administration which emerged amidst the struggle to substantially improve the quality of democracy. However, in its formation, it does not only require clear legal politics, but also requires a holistic study of the mechanism and flow of resolution and models of electoral dispute resolution. The parameter that needs to be used in examining the idea of a special electoral court is to measure the extent and importance of elections for Indonesian democracy. because the more important the meaning of the election is the presence of special election court more worthy of consideration
24
Amalia, Luky Sandra, Aisah Putri Budiatri, Mouliza KD Sweinstani, Atika Nur Kusumaningtyas, and Esty Ekawati. "Simultaneous Elections and the Rise of Female Representation in Indonesia." Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 40, no. 1 (April 2021): 50–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1868103421989716.
Full textAbstract:
In the 2019 election, the proportion of women elected to Indonesia’s People’s Representative Assembly ( Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat, DPR) increased significantly to almost 21 per cent. In this article, we ask whether an institutional innovation – the introduction of simultaneous presidential and legislative elections – contributed to this change. We examine the election results, demonstrating that, overall, women candidates did particularly well in provinces where the presidential candidate nominated by their party won a majority of the vote. Having established quantitatively a connection between results of the presidential elections and outcomes for women legislative candidates, we turn to our qualitative findings to seek a mechanism explaining this outcome. We argue that the simultaneous elections helped women candidates by easing their access to voters who supported one of the presidential candidates, but who were undecided on the legislative election. Rather than imposing additional burdens on female candidates, simultaneous elections assisted them.
25
Karo Karo, Rizky Pratama Putra. "Efforts To Prevent Money Politic, Bribery Crimes To Realize Dignified Simultaneous Elections In 2024 In Indonesia." Widya Yuridika 6, no. 1 (December 2, 2022): 25. http://dx.doi.org/10.31328/wy.v6i1.3842.
Full textAbstract:
The largest democratic party in Indonesia will win simultaneous elections in 2024. The Indonesian people have a right to elect a leader who is willing to serve them and does not engage in corruption. To produce a dignified general election, this simultaneous election must be performed in accordance with the law. The goal of this study is to examine and outline initiatives in Indonesia to avoid voter bribery and ensure fair elections. The normative research method was employed. To reach deductive conclusions, researchers use qualitative study of legal materials. Bribery is a criminal crime, according to the study's findings. Bribery, in addition to other criminal behaviors, might jeopardize the goal of peaceful elections. A dignified general election is one in which citizens can live in peace before, during, and after voting. Various parties use mass socialization through various media to carry out prevention activities. The socialization that can be done is about the criminal threat of bribery; second, about the people's involvement in creating dignified elections by refusing to accept bribes and choosing the best leadership candidates.
26
Sarah, Siti, and Sri Suatmiati. "General Election System In Indonesia Based On Law Of The Republic Of Indonesia NO. 7 OF 2017." Jurnal Sosial Teknologi 2, no. 9 (September 15, 2022): 800–804. http://dx.doi.org/10.36418/jurnalsostech.v2i9.412.
Full textAbstract:
Each country claims that the system of government administration or the political system they build is a democracy. Indonesia is a country that bases its sovereignty on the people's sovereignty in addition to the basis of the rule of law to organize a democratic government by carrying out general elections using a separate system in legislative elections (DPR, DPD, Provincial DPRD, and Regency/City DPRD). The electoral system in Indonesia is inseparable from the recruitment function in the political system. The problem raised in this research is how is the general election system in Indonesia based on Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections, and what are the weaknesses of the open proportional system used in public elections in Indonesia? This research belongs to the normative legal research group prioritizes secondary data (library data and legislation). The nature of this research uses a descriptive-analytical method that describes the actual situation. The result of the study is that the general election system in Indonesia uses an Open Proportional System for the election of members of the Legislative Assembly (DPR, Provincial DPRD, and Regency/City DPRD) as stipulated in Article 168 paragraph (2) of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections, while in section (3) specifies that the election to elect members of the DPD shall be carried out with a district system with many representatives. The disadvantages of using an open proportional system include that it is difficult for parties to integrate or cooperate by taking advantage of existing equations; this system facilitates party fragmentation; when a conflict arises within the party, it will be easy to break up, which often gives birth to new parties; this system gives the party leader an extreme position; the elected representatives may be separated from their constituents due to not knowing each other; and because of the large number of competing parties, it is difficult for a party to gain the majority in parliament needed to form a strong government.
27
Nugroho, Wahyu. "Politik Hukum Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi atas Pelaksanaan Pemilu dan Pemilukada di Indonesia." Jurnal Konstitusi 13, no. 3 (November 22, 2016): 480. http://dx.doi.org/10.31078/jk1331.
Full textAbstract:
After amendment 1945, whether legislative elections and the election of the executive power implementing held directly by the people, and going political reform electoral laws and local election, both in the revision of the existing political regulations, and rules in the law after the Constitutional Court decision, namely Law No. 42 of 2008 on General Election of President and Vice President, and and Law No. 10 of 2016 on the Second Amendment of Act No. 1 of 2015 on Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law No. 1 of 2014 on the election of Governors, Regents and Mayors became acts. The purpose of the study on the implementation of the legal political and local elections are to conduct political rearrangement and local elections law in a mosaic of Indonesian state structure, maturity in politics, the consolidation of local democracy, and changes in local people’s minds to develop the region very hung to the figure of its leader, as well as ensuring the political rights of citizens in national and local political constellation. The results in this study is the need for consistency of law enforcement for compliance with a number of legal instruments and the implementation of procedures and penalties in the administration of elections. Aspects of legal certainty and the cultural aspect is very important law met in order for the elections and the local election purpose in achieving this goal idealized.In addition, the electoral administration in central and local levels, as well as participating in the election and the election shall comply with laws and regulations, ranging from the Commission Regulation, Act, as well as adherence to Constitutional Court decision. The author draws conclusions that the renewal of electoral politics and the local election after the Constitutional Court Decision in the Indonesian constitutional structure has implications for changes in the system, the mechanism and the pattern of elections and the local election organizers and participants of the election and the local election. On some empirical experience that was shown in the administration of elections and the election, people think the dynamic to organize and improve the system, as well as have awareness of constitutional rights guaranteed by the 1945 Constitution on political rights for the sake of the spirit of building area through the local elections to choose a figure that is idealized.
28
Fithor, Alin, and Teuku Afrizal. "The 2024 Indonesia Election Model: A Simplification of Election’s Paper." International Journal of Advances in Social Sciences and Humanities 1, no. 2 (May 31, 2022): 99–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.56225/ijassh.v1i2.45.
Full textAbstract:
Academics consider that the time for general election organizers and state administrators cannot belong because the design concept of holding general elections needs to be discussed until they find a new model. Elections in Indonesia are part of the life of the nation and state. By simplifying the election of paper will make the environment cleaner and less wasteful, this model needs to be applied in several democracies’ country. This research is used as a case study from the 2019 general election with a note that the serious concern is the length of time for voting the election model used by combining the presidential and general elections for 2024. Simplification can also be done with two election papers: the presidential-vice presidential candidate pair with the regional representative council being made one election paper, while the legislative election papers are made into one election paper. Voters to channel their voting rights using the two-election or three-election paper model. Massive socialization can make voters understand the choice of voting model used. Social justice and environmental preservation need to be applied to stakeholders this time.
29
Samosir, Osbin. "Bad Organizers Make Difficulty of Indonesia's Democracy in 2024 National Simultaneous Election." International Journal of Scientific and Management Research 05, no. 09 (2022): 48–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.37502/ijsmr.2022.5904.
Full textAbstract:
Election organizers in Indonesia are often seen as obstacles to the growth of democracy. The presence of election administrators has become a serious problem in the development of democracy in Indonesia. In fact, very high hopes are given to the election organizers as a pillar that will determine the growth of Indonesian democracy. The reason is simple: Indonesian democracy has failed in the past, partly because of the role of the election organizers. The New Order became an opaque record for Indonesian democracy when election administrators became an inseparable part of the authoritarian regime. Even in the early days of reform, the election organizers could not be proud of their work and even became one of the sources of the problem itself. So it is not surprising that the election organizers, namely the Komisi Pemilihan Umum - KPU (General Elections Commission), were asked to supervise their work by establishing the Badan Pengawas Pemilu - Bawaslu (Election Supervisory Body) in 2008. The results achieved did not make the democratization process through general elections better. The poor technical work of election administrators means that election administrators cannot be allowed to work maturely and maturely, but special courts must be prepared for their bad work. The birth of the election ethics body, namely the Dewan Kehormatan Penyelengggara Pemilu - DKPP (The Honorary Council of Election Organizers), shows that the election organizers, namely the KPU and Bawaslu, are doing quite badly in building the electoral process. The big concern is the difficulty of holding a dignified general election in the 2024 national simultaneous elections.
30
Sholahuddin, Abdul Hakam, Anik Iftitah, and Uun Dewi Mahmudah. "Pelaksanaan Pasal 280 Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum." Jurnal Supremasi 9, no. 2 (September 24, 2019): 17–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.35457/supremasi.v9i2.793.
Full textAbstract:
Potential for Election violations is prone to occur in the campaign stage as a moment for the Election Contestants in the 2019 Election to introduce themselves to the public to be elected. Considering this, the empirical legal research "Implementation of Article 280 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections" with research sites in Blitar Regency becomes urgent to be examined as a reflection of the quality of the implementation of Indonesian Elections in the regions. The discovery of thousands of campaign props in prohibited places in the implementation of the campaign stages in Blitar Regency should be regulated following statutory regulations
31
Muchammad, Nur, and Munsharif Abdul Chalim. "Analysis Of Criminal Liability Crime of Legislative Elections (Case Study Legislative Elections in Semarang)." Jurnal Daulat Hukum 2, no. 1 (March 15, 2019): 83. http://dx.doi.org/10.30659/jdh.v2i1.4210.
Full textAbstract:
This study aims to determine the form of criminal responsibility to the crime of legislative elections in Semarang; and obstacles in the implementation of criminal law enforcement against criminal acts of the legislative elections in the city of Semarang.The results showed that the process of law enforcement against criminal acts in general legislative elections held in the context of the criminal justice system in Indonesia, which includes the process of investigation by the police, prosecution by prosecutors and sentencing / verdict by the District Court. Criminal investigations are conducted legislative elections Police, in accordance with the provisions of Article 1 Paragraph (13) of Act No. 2 of 2002 on the Indonesian National Police. In the organization of the legislative elections, in the enforcement of the criminal acts of the legislative elections undergone many obstacles such as: Non-fulfillment of formal requirements and substantive a report criminal election, which resulted election supervisors or investigators difficulty to follow up a report, on terms materially one of them seek witnesses were very hard done by the Election Supervisory; The absence of witnesses because people who know the incident did not dare to testify due to intimidation;The limited time handling criminal offense elections, at both or election supervisory level law enforcement officers.Keywords: Criminal Liability; Crime; Legislative Election.
32
Hasanah, Neneng. "Syûrâ dan Fenomena Pemilihan Kepala Daerah di Indonesia." AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 16, no. 2 (December 11, 2016): 241–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v16i2.4454.
Full textAbstract:
Shura and the Phenomenon of Local Elections in Indonesia. Shura and the elections are social institutions in the political arena in Indonesia. In Islam, choosing a leader is a necessity. Direct election is a mechanism that has been exemplified by the Companions of the Prophet, for instance, when choosing Abu Bakr R.A. as the leader of the Muslims after the Prophet passed away. There was no will for this election. Based on divine guidance and the instinct of the Companions about Abu Bakr’s personality, Muslims did shura and directly selected Abu Bakr to be the first Caliph.DOI: 10.15408/ajis.v16i2.4454
33
Cornelis, Vieta I. "CODE OF ETHICS: QUALITY OF ELECTION MANAGEMENT TO REGIONAL ELECTIONS IN SIMULAR ELECTIONS IN INDONESIA." Constitutional Law Society 1, no. 1 (April 1, 2022): 10–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.36448/cls.v1i1.4.
Full textAbstract:
The urgency of the implementation of General Elections in a Democratic State in Indonesia is to function for the sustainability of the government system so that it requires an active role from all elements of the Indonesian nation, to realize a General Election that is truly carried out in a structured, systematic and responsible manner with consistent and trustworthy escort or supervision. That’s why things that happen related to the code of ethics for the organizers of the General Election, at the time of the General Election simultaneously and must be properly regulated by the organizers of the democratic party. The research method used in this article is normative legal research or commonly referred to as doctrinal law research that focuses on written regulations (law in book). The findings in this article show that in the future simultaneous general elections in the State of Indonesia, which consists of islands with different ethnicities, cultures, different human resources. One thing is realized that democracy does not guarantee equality of conditions, democracy only guarantees equality of opportunity. This equality is what we must apply so that all people have the same rights and obligations in obtaining the things that are mandated in the administration of state life.
34
Laksmi Candra Amalia. "Perlindungan Hukum Anggota Kelompok Penyelenggara Pemungutan Suara yang Meninggal Dunia Dalam Menjalankan Tugasnya." Jurist-Diction 5, no. 4 (July 31, 2022): 1381–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/jd.v5i4.37317.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThis paper discusses the protection for KPPS members who died in the 2019 elections. Based on article 22E paragraph (1) UUD NRI 1945, election in Indonesia are held every five years. The first election in Indonesia were held in 1955. The elections in 2019 which fell on April 17 were different from the elections on the previous period. The first time in Indonesia the 2019 elections were held silmutaneously. Where Indonesian citizens choose five state institutions namely the President and Vice President, DPR RI, Provincial DPRD, City/Regency DPRD, and DPD simultaneous election is expected to be efficient both in terms of time, funds and personnel. But in reality, many KPPS members have died while carrying out their duties. This is due to increase in workload compared to the previous election period. In addition, the working hours of KPPS members are not regulated in detail either in the Election Law or PKPU made by the KPU. Based on this, there is a need for rules governing more detailed right for KPPS members. Keywords: Legal Protection; Election Organizer; KPPS Member Rights; Death. AbstrakTulisan ini membahas tentang perlindungan bagi anggota KPPS yang meninggal dunia pada Pemilu tahun 2019. Berdasarkan Pasal 22E ayat (1) bahwasannya pemilu di Indonesia dilaksanakan setiap lima tahun sekali. Pemilu pertama kali di Indonesia diadakan pada tahun 1955. Pemilu pada tahun 2019 yang jatuh pada tanggal 17 April, berbeda dari pemilu-pemilu pada periode sebelumnya. Pertama kali di Indonesia pemilu tahun 2019 ini diselenggarakan secara serentak. Dimana warga negara Indonesia memilih lima lembaga negara yakni Presiden dan Wakil Presiden, DPR RI, DPRD Provinsi, DPRD Kota/Kabupaten, dan DPD secara bersamaan dalam satu watu. Pemilu serentak ini diharapkan mampu mengefisiensi baik dari segi waktu, dana maupun tenaga. Namun pada kenyataanya, banyak anggota KPPS yang meninggal dunia dalam menjalankan tugasnya. Hal ini dikarenakan bertambahnya beban kerja dibandingkan dengan pemilu periode sebelumnya. Selain itu, jam kerja anggota KPPS juga tidak diatur secara rinci baik dalam UU Pemilu maupun PKPU yang dibuat oleh KPU. Berdasarkan hal tersebut perlu adanya aturan yang mengatur lebih rinci mengenai hak-hak bagi anggota KPPS.Kata Kunci: Perlindungan Hukum; Penyelenggara Pemilu; Hak Anggota KPPS; Meninggal Dunia.
35
Ratnaningsih, Ni Made Dwita, and A. A. G. P. Widanaputra. "The reaction of Indonesian capital market to political event the announcement of Indonesia presidential election 2019 results." International research journal of management, IT and social sciences 6, no. 6 (October 15, 2019): 87–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.21744/irjmis.v6n6.765.
Full textAbstract:
Political events, especially the General Election is one of the non-economic risks that can influence investors' decisions to invest in the capital market. Elections are closely related to the policies that will be implemented by the elected President thus the elections are important for investors as the considerations for investment. This study aimed to determine the reaction of the Indonesian capital market by testing the information content of political events the announcement of the presidential election 2019 results using event study. The population in this study was all the companies that are listed in Indonesia Index KOMPAS 100, the sample was taken by the saturated sample method. The hypothesis was tested with one sample t-test. The announcement of the election results would contain the information that caused the market to react, as the evidenced there were significant abnormal returns occurred around the event window, and the average abnormal return that occur were positive, thus the announced election results that Jokowi-Ma'aruf’s victory was positively welcomed by the market
36
Aziz, Mokhamad Abdul. "Pilkada Serentak melalui DPRD: Sebuah Gagasan Mewujudkan Pilkada Demokratis Perspektif Pancasila dan UUD 1945." Politik Indonesia: Indonesian Political Science Review 1, no. 2 (July 15, 2016): 154. http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/jpi.v1i2.6582.
Full textAbstract:
<p>Unison in the succeeding organized the elections after December 9, 2015 as part of efforts to strengthen electoral democracy, Indonesia faced with the challenges of building a democratic substance. One that deserves to be evaluated is a system of direct election by the people. Although it has been conducted simultaneously, direct election is still too extravagant, yet produces the ideal leader, even a lot of them were involved in corruption cases, and most important their actions are not in line with the Indonesian democracy typical. Pancasila mandates that Indonesia's democracy is a democracy that is led by the inner wisdom of deliberations-representation. This is called modern democracy. Through Parliament elections simultaneously is the solution to realize the Indonesian democratic elections typical.</p>
37
Hidayaturrahman, Mohammad, Sudarman Sudarman, Naili Adilah Hamhij, Anak Agung Putu Sugiantiningsih, Ahmad Hasan Ubaid, and Elazhari Elazhari. "Political Broker Giving Money and Intimidating in Regional Head Elections in Indonesia." Jurnal Studi Sosial dan Politik 6, no. 2 (December 31, 2022): 177–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.19109/jssp.v6i2.10102.
Full textAbstract:
The election of regional heads is actually a place to take choices directly by the people or voters in the regions. But in fact, the choice of voters is much influenced, even manipulated by political brokers. This study was conducted to reveal the models of political brokers and their operating patterns in regional head elections in Indonesia. Political brokers have hijacked direct democracy in local elections. The regional head should have a direct contract with the voters, related to the work program at the time of contestation and accountability at the time of election. But the process was hijacked midway by political brokers. Political brokers have long operated in the process in Indonesia, both general elections, presidential elections, village head elections, and regional head elections. This research used descriptive qualitative method. Data was collected through in-depth interviews with informants who were directly involved in the regional head election. From the research conducted, it is found that political brokers in regional head elections in Indonesia are village heads, and community leaders. Political brokers perform their role in two ways. First, by giving money to the head of the electorate. The money comes from regional head candidates who are given by the winning team for regional head candidates for political brokers. The money given by regional head candidates to political brokers consists of money for own political broker and operational money, as well as money to be distributed to voters. Second, political brokers also act to intimidate, threaten and frighten potential voters, if they do not vote for candidates who are supported by political brokers.
38
AS, Ali Syaifa. "PARTISIPASI PUBLIK DI KOTA BEKASI DALAM PEMILU 2019." JURNAL ADMINISTRASI DAN KEBIJAKAN PUBLIK 12, no. 1 (February 19, 2022): 30–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.33558/akp.v12i1.2868.
Full textAbstract:
The 2019 election was the first simultaneous election held in Indonesia since the first election was held in 1955. Simultaneously here in the sense of legislative elections together with the implementation of presidential and vice presidential elections. So that in the 2019 election voters get five types of ballots. This simultaneity creates its own challenges in the holding of the 2019 elections. Both in terms of the technical implementation of voting and vote counting. Also in terms of community enthusiasm or community participation. In practice, although the voting and counting have experienced complexity because of the large number of votes that must be used by voters and take a lot of time when counting votes at polling stations (TPS). However, the good news is that the results of the voting and counting are the achievement of greater public participation from the previous elections. In the data records in the Bekasi City KPU, Community Participation for the Election of President and Vice President is 76.1% and for the Legislative Election is 75.8%. Even if it refers to the target of participation suspected by the Indonesian KPU it has not been achieved. The participation target announced by the Indonesian KPU is 77.5%. However, through a number of socialization efforts carried out by the Bekasi City KPU, public participation in the 2019 elections can increase.
39
Antari, Putu Eva Ditayani. "INTERPRETASI DEMOKRASI DALAM SISTEM MEKANIS TERBUKA PEMILIHAN UMUM DI INDONESIA." Jurnal Panorama Hukum 3, no. 1 (July 5, 2018): 87–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.21067/jph.v3i1.2359.
Full textAbstract:
General election is an important means for the state to ensure the implementation of a government that obtains the legitimacy of the people. In addition, the general election also aims to uphold democracy within sovereign states and ensure the implementation of the human rights of the citizens. Likewise in Indonesia, which periodically conducts general elections every 5 (five) years. General elections in Indonesia have undergone a shift from closed mechanical systems to open mechanical systems since 2004. This is influenced by the reforms that uphold the democracy and sovereignity, as well as respect for the political rights of citizens. The open mechanical system has variations since its use in 2004 to date, especially concerning the valid vote in the election. Therefore, this research will focus on analysing democracy that is being implemented in the election through open mechanical system, and various variations in open mechanical mechanical system in Indonesia. This research will be conducted by using normative research method by using primary legal materials in the form of laws governing the election, as well as secondary legal materials from various literature and scientific articles related to the problems discussed in the research. The results will be presented iin the form of problem description with analysis of the variety of open mechanical systems practiced in Indonesia. This study portrays the elections that are carried out honestly has manifested democracy and sovereignty of the people in the country. Furthermore there are various weaknesses of democratic interpretation in the variation of the implementation of open mechanical systems in elections in Indonesia.
40
Hayati, Mulida, and Rico Septian Noor. "Korelasi PILKADA Langsung dan Korupsi di Indonesia." MORALITY : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 2 (December 28, 2020): 102. http://dx.doi.org/10.52947/morality.v6i2.174.
Full textAbstract:
Elections are a very important moment in a democratic country like Indonesia. With a variety of experiences holding elections since the country gained its independence to the electoral event which was initiated directly and simultaneously as mandated by the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia in its Decision. There are so many problems in it, including Corruption in Direct Local Election practices in Indonesia. This writing tries to describe the various opportunities for Corruption in the implementation of the Direct Local Election and various efforts that can be made to prevent such Corruption. There needs to be a strong commitment and synergy from all entities in this country so that the problem of corruption is not widespread and rooted in Indonesia.
41
Prawira, Syailendra Anantya. "Election violation and election law enforcement in general election in Indonesia." Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist 4, no. 1 (December 8, 2019): 25–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.35326/volkgeist.v4i1.424.
Full textAbstract:
General Elections are the embodiments of the mandate stipulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia Article 1 paragraph (2) which affirms that "sovereignty is in the hands of the people and carried out according to the Constitution". The Formulation Document that will be formulated in the research are: (1) What is the violation in the general election? And (2) What is law enforcement in general election. The method used in this study is normative legal research, normative legal research methods or library law research methods are methods or procedures that are used in legal research by examining existing library material. Election violations constitute acts prohibited by the Election Law against election organizers resulting in the imposition of sanctions for violations. The enactment of Law Number 7 Year 2017 on General Elections provides for different types of violations, disputes, criminal offenses and electoral disputes. The crime of elections is a criminal offense punishable by a particular punishment based on the criminal justice system. The purpose of election is to carry out popular sovereignty and the realization of the political rights of the people to produce leaders who will occupy important positions in the government.
42
Rahmat, Diding, and Anthon Fathanudien. "Law Enforcement of Election Crimes in Indonesia." UNIFIKASI : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, no. 2 (November 24, 2021): 210–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.25134/unifikasi.v8i2.5074.
Full textAbstract:
The election is an election conducted by Indonesian citizens who have the right to vote to choose their representatives who sit in the House of Representatives both central and regional, or the Regional Representative Council, the President, and Vice President as a means of sovereignty people. Elections are carried out in a direct, public, free, confidential and fair manner. While election crimes are prohibited acts such as violating campaign bans, conducting campaigns outside the established schedule, providing incorrect information related to voter registration data, political money, adding, reducing and or changing votes. The purpose of this study was to determine the regulation of election criminal acts in Indonesia and how to enforce the law. Election crime regulations are regulated in Law Number 7 of 2017 Concerning Elections, namely Article 488 through Article 554. Election criminal law enforcement in Indonesia there are 116 cases consisting of 29 cases of money politics, 22 cases of acts harming election participants, 15 cases counterfeiting, 10 cases of campaigning in places of worship or educational institutions, 9 cases of campaigning outside the schedule, 17 cases of campaigning involving banned parties, 7 cases of campaigning using government facilities, 5 cases of destruction of props and 2 cases concerning the election of participants and their data still, then, in general, the implementation has run well even though at the level of implementation there are only weaknesses such as the substance of the regulation and sanctions for election crimes are multiple interpretations along with severe sanctions, from the structure in this case there are still law enforcement officers in this case GAKUMDU, Bawaslu, the police and the police The weaknesses experienced by weaknesses such as in terms of budget, human resources and facilities and infrastructure aside from the side, culture namely the culture of the community which is still low in the awareness of elections in Indonesia, makes violations of election criminal offenses still high.
43
Susilo, Tri. "DESIGN OF SPECIAL JUSTICE AGENCY ELECTION CHAIN IN INDONESIA." UNTAG Law Review 1, no. 1 (May 31, 2017): 68. http://dx.doi.org/10.36356/ulrev.v1i1.524.
Full textAbstract:
<p>Past-approval of government regulation in lieu of Law No.1 of 2014 concerning the election of governor, regent, and mayor (hereinafter called local election), In accordance with the decision of the Constitutional Court Number 97 /PUU-XI / 2013, the Constitutional Court is no longer authorized to resolve disputes on direct election results, because the provisions of Article 236C of Law Number 12 Year 2008 NRI are against the Constitution of 1945. Article 157 paragraph (1) Law No. 8 Year 2015 determines that the dispute settlement on direct election results become the authority of specialized judiciary. But before a specialized judiciary is formed, then the Constitutional Court is authorized to resolve disputes on direct election results. The authority of the Constitutional Court is the constitutional authority to fulfill temporary legal vacuum (rechtvakum). Therefore legislators should immediately establish a specialized judiciary which has the authority to resolve the disputes on direct election results. There is a new design in election mechanisms of regional hand. The law a quo stated that elections be held simultaneously at the national level. This design would require regulatory support, such as the establishment of as special court, solve any disputes that arise from the election. The problems emerge in this study is how the urgency of special court, how it compares to special court on election matters in various countries and how the relevance of the comparison can be applied in Indonesia. This was conducted using a legal-normative research. The research conclude unable to meet the demands for justice, for example, the court's decision are settled after the elections conducted and thick-layers on legal remedies so it is counterproductive to the election that have limited period of time. These legal remedies are even separated in several judicatures. Various countries have also established a special court on local elections with a variety of institutional design and procedural law. For Indonesia, the special court is ad hoc court, based on provincial and district or city and authorized to settle disputes concerning the local elections.</p>
44
Abdullah, Ar Rozi, and Payamta Payamta. "Belanja Oportunistik Pemerintah Daerah pada Masa Pemilihan Kepala Daerah di Indonesia (Studi pada Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Non-Jawa)." Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi 6, no. 1 (June 25, 2021): 46. http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jia.v6i1.30530.
Full textAbstract:
This article analyses opportunistic behaviour of local government spending in period the elections for non-Javanese local heads in Indoensia which have variability in financial performance. Previous studies have shown that the opportunistic behaviour of regional spending is closely related to the holding of local head elections and the presence of incumbents running for reelections. The effect of election and the existence of incumbents in elections on local government spending is tested using a set of panel data for the 2015-2018 period. A total of 858 observation units were tested, consisting of political and financial factors in the pre-election year, election year, and post-election year. Based on the results of regression testing, it is found that evidence of non-Javanese local government spending is opportunistic around local head elections. This condition is indicated by the increase in Grant and Financial Assistance Expenditures, which are discretionary spending. This evidence confirms some previous research on opportunistic spending behaviour around local head elections.
45
Samosir, Osbin. "LOOKING FOR THE FORM OF INDONESIAN DEMOCRACY: STUDY OF PANCASILA IDEOLOGY TOWARDS CONCURRENT ELECTIONS IN 2024." Dinasti International Journal of Education Management And Social Science 2, no. 4 (April 25, 2021): 676–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.31933/dijemss.v2i4.831.
Full textAbstract:
Indonesia’s democracy has taken huge leaps since the starting of reformation in 1998, compared to Soeharto’s authoritarian ruling (New Order) from 1966 to May 21, 1998, and during Soekarno’s ruling from the country’s independence in 1945 until 1966. One year after Soeharto’s fall on May 21, 1998, Indonesia held its first democratically election on June 7, 1999. The election was contested by 48 political parties. In 2004, Indonesia for the first time held its direct presidential election. One year later, Indonesia held its first regional elections, where voters directly elect governors, regents and mayors. The question is on whether the current democratic practices have been in accordance with all democratic values as intended by Pancasila ideology as the basic foundation for Indonesia in all political actions? Pancasila: 1). The belief in one God, 2). Just and civilized humanity, 3). Indonesian unity, 4. Democracy under the wise guidance of representative consultation, 5). Social justice for all peoples of Indonesia. The country’s founding fathers formulated the understanding of democracy based the traditional practices of democracy at the grassroots level which have lasted for centuries throughout the country. However what happens now is that Indonesia just imitated the posture of Western/European democracy. It turns out that Indonesian democracy is very fragile because it does not have a tradition of democracy that grows independently from Indonesia's fertile soil itself, but democracy is taken from other cultures that have grown and developed in Europe and then transplanted in Indonesian soil. Therefore, the format for direct elections in Indonesia must be reviewed for improvement.
46
Mulyadi, Dedi. "CONCURRENT REGIONAL ELECTIONS PHENOMENON AS A POLITICAL RECRUITMENT IN INDONESIA." Jurnal Dinamika Hukum 18, no. 1 (January 31, 2018): 87. http://dx.doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2018.18.1.843.
Full textAbstract:
Concurrent regional election is a phenomenon in local democracy development in Indonesia. Many Efforts are performed to political recruitment. Yet, the implementation among expectations, aspirations and reality are frequently impaired proven by many problems in the implementation of the local democracy itself. The research applied normative juridical approach by identifying the problem in for complete background of the implementation of concurrent regional elections in Indonesia, its problems and solution. This research is expected to generate specific alternative insight through formulation of policy. It is expected to be a solution of any concurrent regional elections problems, a permanent rather than ad-hoc concept for the regional election, and a formulation of general regulation (lex generalis) on election which summarizes the present election regulation (lex specialist). These changes are internalized in continuing learning concept that can create academics, practitioners and technocrats on election. Keywords: democracy, local democracy, political positions, regional election and political recruitment.
47
Sri Hardjanto, Untung. "Legitimasi Pemilihan Umum di Indonesia Tahun 2019." Administrative Law and Governance Journal 2, no. 1 (June 11, 2019): 106–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i1.106-112.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract The article aims to find out the legitimacy of the general elections in Indonesia in 2019, especially related to the future implementation of the basic constitution for holding the 2019 general election. Research is normative legal research based on the statutory approach. the results of the study indicate that legitimacy is the recognition and support of the community towards the winner of the election to then form a state government. So that legitimacy is needed for political stability and the possibility of social change and opening opportunities to expand fields in order to improve welfare. For Indonesia, the 2019 Election will receive formal-procedural legitimacy from anyone considering the existence of institutions that carry out the implementation of elections based on the principle of overflow. Whereas the legitimacy that is based on personal characteristics will only be a comparison and directing, leading to the voting of the people, will not affect the government formed given the existence of peaceful and democratic election pacts and the media that has arrived in the regions. Keywords: Legitimacy, Constitution, General Elections, Jurdil, and Luber Abstrak Artikel bertujuan untuk mengetahui legitimasi pemilihan umum di Indonesia tahun 2019, khususnya terkait dengan masa depan pelaksanaan dasar konstitusi penyelenggaraan pemilihan umum 2019. Penelitian merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang berdasarkan pada pendekatan statutory approach. hasil penelitian menjukkan bahwa legitimasi merupakan pengakuan dan dukungan dari masyarakat terhadap pemenang pemilu untuk kemudian membentuk pemerintahan negara. Sehingga legitimasi diperlukan untuk kesetabilan politik dan kemungkinan terjadinya perubahan sosial serta membuka kesempatan memperluas bidang-bidang dalam rangka peningkatana kesejahteraan. Untuk Indonesia, Pemilu Tahun 2019 akan mendapat legitimasi formal-prosedural dari siapapun mengingat adanya lemabaga negara yang menjalankan penyelenggaraan pemilu berdasar pada asas luber jurdil. Sedangkan legitimasi yang mendasarkan pada ciri pribadi hanya akan menjadi pembanding dan mengarahkan, menggiring menuju pemberian suara masyarakat, tidak akan berpengaruh pada pemearintahan yang terbentuk mengingat adanya pakta pemilu damai dan demokratis serta mas media yang sudah sampai kedaerah. Kata Kunci: Legitimasi, Konstitusi, Pemilihan Umum, Jurdil dan Luber
48
Wartoyo, Franciscus Xaverius, and Benyamin Tungga. "THE CONSEPT AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION OF INDONESIAN LEGISLATIVE ELECTIONS BASED ON THE PANCASILA DEMOCRACY PERSPECTIVE." Yustisia Jurnal Hukum 8, no. 1 (April 27, 2019): 109. http://dx.doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v0ixx.13226.
Full textAbstract:
<p>Indonesia’s democracy system was built on the basis and the strength of Pancasila, which did not favor the excessive desires of individual negotiations (liberalism) neither absolute state domination, non-liberalism, namely direct and indirect democracy that was once practiced. Those forms have their own weaknesses, but this paper will only highlight the positive side of the open democratic system, sincerely the democratic system of this nation is Pancasila democracy which refers to those two major forces of democracy. The implementation of Pancasila’s democracy in the Legislative Election can be shown in Law Number 7 of 2017 on the General Elections 2019 in Indonesia. The history of the implementation of elections in Indonesia revealed a variety of dynamics indicated by several changes in the constitutional law which were used as the basis for the implementation of elections. The publication of the Election Law is the elaboration of the provisions of Article 22E of the 1945 Indonesian Constitution. This means that the principles of democracy contained within 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, must become the main foundations in designing norms in Law Number 7 of 2017 on the General Elections 2019, as happened, it turns out that the parliamentary threshold regulation within the Constitutional Law are ineffective in implementing this democracy.</p>
49
Muzayanah, Muzayanah. "Kajian Yuridis Tentang Kesadaran Warga Negara Untuk Menggunakan Hak Pilih Dalam Melaksanakan Demokrasi Pada Pemilihan Kepala Daerah." Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) 7, no. 1 (February 2, 2021): 280. http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v7i1.31492.
Full textAbstract:
The Republic of Indonesia is a state based on the rule of law in implementing state administration based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. The administration of government with a democratic system in which the highest sovereignty is in the hands of the people and in its implementation the people elect a leader to run the government. To determine the regional leader / regional head must be carried out through regional head elections. Regional head elections are intended to continue the government which has ended its term of office. Therefore, regional head elections must be held simultaneously throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia. The holding of regional head elections is a big job and is the responsibility of all parties, including all citizens of the Republic of Indonesia, so that the implementation of regional head elections runs well. The regional head elections in question have been held and are the result of the hard work of various relevant state institutions that have carried out their duties and responsibilities, in this case the General Election Commission (KPU) which has held regional head elections simultaneously throughout the territory of the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia (NKRI). ). The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia regulates the voting rights of citizens to participate and actively participate in determining regional leaders / regional heads who will lead in their respective territories. Citizens have the right to vote to vote at regional head elections. This is of course an awareness and responsibility as citizens so that regional leaders / regional heads are elected who are able to organize government and create prosperity and justice based on the values contained in the principles of Pancasila. The problem in this research is how a juridical study of the awareness of citizens to use their voting rights in implementing democracy in regional head elections?This research is a normative juridical research with the Library Research research method. The data collection method uses secondary data in the form of primary legal materials and secondary and tertiary legal materials. The population in this study is a random population of residents / community of Pengkol hamlet, Mangunsari village, Gunung pati District, Semarang City. The results of the research show that people in this region as citizens of the Republic of Indonesia have the awareness and responsibility to exercise their voting rights in the implementation of regional head elections, especially the election for Mayor and Deputy Mayor of Semarang on December 9, 2020. Regional head elections in this region have been going well and in a conducive situation even though it was held during the Covid-19 pandemic. It is hoped that the holding of this regional head election will produce regional leaders who have reliable and quality leadership management and are able to bring the community to realize social justice for all Indonesian people.
50
Abqa, Muhammad Ardhi Razaq. "Partai Politik Dan Moderasi Beragama Sebagai Pilar Demokrasi di Indonesia." RESIPROKAL: Jurnal Riset Sosiologi Progresif Aktual 2, no. 1 (September 14, 2020): 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.29303/resiprokal.v2i1.27.
Full textAbstract:
Indonesia is a large nation with a diversity and a lot of its society. In a multicultural society, there is a potential conflict among the nation's children who are at risk of splitting unity and unity. This kind of reality is often found in various democratic contestations in the election of regional chiefs (elections). Religious moderation becomes very important when in a process of democracies emerging identity politics which of course risk injuring democratic values. The purpose of this research is to discuss the effectiveness of religious moderation in realizing the democratic elections (regional election) and the function of political political parties in religious moderation as a pillar of democracy in Indonesia. The method used is research libraries. The conclusion of this research is the first, religious moderation is effective in establishing democratic elections, both political parties serve as a mobilizer for religious moderation to create a dignified and lasting democracy