Journal articles on the topic 'Economics – Russia'
To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Economics – Russia.
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Economics – Russia.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Dikarev, A. "China – Angola – Russia: Non-existing Triangle." Journal of International Analytics, no. 3 (September 28, 2019): 48–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.46272/2587-8476-2019-0-3-48-61.
Full textAbstract:
This article contains the detailed comparative analysis of Russian and Chinese participation in the economic development of one of the most important African countries. The article highlights the history of credits and loans, foreign direct investments to Angola, dynamics of Russian and Chines trade turnover in the 21-st century. Main projects of Russia-Angola economic co-operation, activities of the biggest Chinese companies in Angola are in the scope of this research. Main economic interest of both powers – China and Russia – is to obtain access to the rich energy and mineral resources of Angola. However, any numerical indices of Russian and Chinese involvement into Angolan economics show that Russia cannot compete with China in this respect. Incomparable scale of trade turnover and economic cooperation make the hypotheses about possible “rivalry” between Russia and China in this region groundless. In spite of the fact that China has reduced loans volumes to Angola recently, the trade between the two countries shows increasing trend. For the time being Russia seems competitive to China in military cooperation with Angola though falls behind in humanitarian sphere.
2
Mau, V. "Economy and Policy in 2011: Global Crisis and Search for a New Model of Growth." Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 2 (February 20, 2012): 4–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2012-2-4-26.
Full textAbstract:
The article reveals two factors which determined social and economic development of Russia in 2011: future elections and the global economic crisis. Relative sustainability of the Russian economy is noted. Still, macroeconomic stability remains fragile. Principal features of the global economic crisis are considered: its structural and systemic character. The specifics of Russian economic policy is analyzed. A new model of growth is proposed that is based on supply-side economics, its key elements are studied. Recent political changes in the Russian society are analyzed as well as their influence on economic dynamics. The necessity of complex modernization in Russia is stressed.
3
Golovnin, Michael. "An overview of the Institute of economics of RAS research: studies in economics and economic policy." Obshchestvo i ekonomika, no. 2 (2022): 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.31857/s020736760018607-6.
Full textAbstract:
The article shows the main stages and problems of scientific research at the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences for 90 years of its existence: the history of the Institute, its achievements in the Soviet period of 1930-1991, the challenges and solutions to problems that arose during the transition period of the 1990s; the emergence of new research areas, and the development prospects for the Institute as they are seen today. Great importance is given to further studies in economic theory, the work on the problems of economic policy and the vision of Russia's long-term strategy.
4
Ms. Noor Jehan and Prof. Dr. Shabir Ahmad Khan. "Revival of Russian Language in Central Asian Republics in the Twenty First (21st) Century." Journal of European Studies (JES) 38, no. 2 (July 1, 2022): 18–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.56384/jes.v38i2.253.
Full textAbstract:
Russian language went into a decline during the 1990s when Central Asian Republics (CARs) simultaneously embarked on the process of nation and state building along with economic transition. The CARs desired to diversify their political and economic relations and to lessen their dependence on Russian Federation during their early transition period. Due to its own economic and political problems associated with its transition, Russia could not pay full attention to its former Soviet states during the immediate post-Soviet period. However, due to the Tsarist and particularly Soviet legacies, the economic connectivity and interdependence of former Soviet states on Russian Federation proved long lasting. The revival of Russian language in former Soviet Central Asian Republics is mainly due to the theory of Economics of Language which explores mutual effects of language and economic variables. It says that fluency and command over a dominant language i.e., a language of science and technology and trade provides more dividends. The CARs are still heavily dependent on trade and remittances of their nationals working in Russia. A large number of workers from the countries of Central Asia work in the Russian Federation. Their remittances contribute immensely to the Gross Domestic Product (GDPs) of these countries. The CARs re-started promoting Russian language in their countries due to a significant role of this language in their economies and economic relations with Russia. Since 2000, the Russian economic revival has naturally strengthened its political and economic role in the former Soviet space which also includes Central Asia. Consequently, the Russian language also received fresh emphasis.
5
Kapeliushnikov, R. I. "Returns to education in Russia: Nowhere below?" Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 8 (August 7, 2021): 37–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-8-37-68.
Full textAbstract:
The paper presents a wide set of estimates for returns to education in Russia, introducing a number of new sources of microdata that previosly remained unused by both Russian and foreign researchers. Until now virtually all available estimates for Russia were based on data from a single source — The Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey — Higher School of Economics (RLMS-HSE). According to these data, since the mid-2000s returns to education rapidly declined and have dropped to abnormally low levels. The paper tests the thesis of ultra-low economic value of Russian education using data from three alternative representative surveys regularly conducted by Rosstat. The analysis shows that currently returns to education in Russia reach 12—13%, which is much higher than the standard RLMS estimates. University-type tertiary education almost doubles earnings (its premium approaches to 100%), and even short-cycle tertiary education provides a premium of about 20—30%. Alternative sources also indicate that over the past 15 years, returns to education in Russia remained stable and, therefore, no decreasing trend in the economic value of education has been observed. This makes it possible to reject the currently popular thesis about abnormally low returns to education in Russia.
6
Belyanova, Antonina, and Sergey Kaymanakov. "Integration Processes on the Post-Soviet Space." Moscow University Economics Bulletin 2015, no. 1 (February 28, 2015): 108–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.38050/01300105201516.
Full textAbstract:
The article presents the materials of the Round Table discussion on “Reproductive ties between Russia and the CIS: recovery issues and further integration of their economies in conditions of forming a single Eurasian Economic Union”. The Round Table was organized and carried out on 17 June, 2014 by the problem group “The patterns of reproduction and growth”, together with the Centre of the Russian economic model of the Department of Political Economy, Faculty of Economics, Moscow State University.
7
Khanin, Grigory. "Is This the Right Way to Teach Economics to School Students?" Ideas and Ideals 12, no. 4-2 (December 23, 2020): 267–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2020-12.4.2-267-276.
Full textAbstract:
Due to the extremely low level of current Russian economic scientists and practitioners, we can only place our hope on the younger generation. In this regard, the article considers the textbook on Economic Theory recommended by the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation for students of 10-11th grades, currently in its 26th edition. The textbook arouses no interest, only antipathy to Economics among school students. It is unjustifiably focused on economic theory, not practice. The textbook is too complicated and boring, almost completely ignoring the economic problems of Russia and Third World countries. It is argued that the course of Economics for high school students can be not only informative and useful, but also involving. The Soviet and Russian economies are full of mysteries, which can make use of the enthusiasm school students have for solving mysteries and puzzles. The author suggests a program for a course in Economics for school students, comprising 10 new chapters, as well as a summary of the new chapters. The author also presents economic entities interested in high-quality school textbooks. The textbook recommended by the Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation is compared to the previously published more informative and involving textbooks for high school students.
8
Anikin, Vasiliy A. "The New Russia? Yes. Comment on Recent Findings from ‘Is New Russia New?’." Мир России 26, no. 4 (September 24, 2017): 51–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1811-038x-2017-26-4-51-70.
Full textAbstract:
Vasiliy A. Anikin – PhD in Economics, Associate Professor, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Senior Research Fellow, Institute for Social Policy, National Research University Higher School of Economics; Senior Research Fellow, Institute of Sociology, Russian Academy of Sciences. Address: of. 4331, building 4, 26, Shabolovka St., Moscow, 119049, Russian Federation. E-mail: vanikin@hse.ru
Citation: Anikin V. (2017) The New Russia? Yes. Comment on Recent Findings From ‘Is New Russia New?’. Mir Rossii, vol. 26, no 4, pp. 51–70. DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2017-26-4-51-70
This paper addresses the general question raised in the recent study ‘Is New Russia New?’ (2016). The author of this article develops the idea that new Russia is new. He argues with some of the findings of the considered study. The main points are as follows: the changes in Russia are better understood within a transitional discourse; the unique way of Russia is to constitute a Democratic Power integrated within a European civilization; the ‘statist’ path of Russia is not a curse, but a tunnel of opportunities for social solidarity; the social structure of Russia is mostly based on income stratification and class elements, which are likely to coexist with post-industrial traps, like unskilled labor, or the precariat; the human development of Russia is higher than in the Soviet Union, though its growth has reached saturation point; neoliberal policy is a kind of new rut for Russia, which crucially obstructs the structural reforms and perspectives for its successful transition towards the informational age that has yet to arrive.
9
Gapsalamov, Almaz R. "Economics education in Russia at the present stage." New Trends and Issues Proceedings on Humanities and Social Sciences 4, no. 1 (August 26, 2017): 297–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.18844/prosoc.v4i1.2269.
Full text
10
Hsiung, Christopher Weidacher. "China’s Technology Cooperation with Russia: Geopolitics, Economics, and Regime Security." Chinese Journal of International Politics 14, no. 3 (August 15, 2021): 447–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poab009.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Technology cooperation has long constituted an important part in China’s bilateral engagement with Russia. In recent years, however, Sino-Russian technology cooperation has seen a remarkable increase and both sides now view such interaction as a core dimension in the current and future development of the strategic partnership. This article examines the two countries’ technological collaboration, focusing in particular on China’s engagement with Russia in emerging technologies and strategic domains. The article argues that three explanations account to explain closer engagement from China: (i) intensified strategic competition with the USA, (ii) broader efforts to expand the overall trade and economic relationship with Russia, and (iii) domestic regime security incentives. Overall, while there exist several challenges and obstacles, increased technology cooperation will continue to expand and also enhance the Sino-Russian strategic partnership. This does not mean that China and Russia will form a formal alliance, but technology cooperation will constitute a critical component in their bilateral relationship, as it reduces their dependence on Western technology, and further consolidates an already well-grounded bilateral relationship.
11
Brada, Josef C., and Alec Nove. "Studies in Economics and Russia." Russian Review 52, no. 1 (January 1993): 135. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/130898.
Full text
12
Colton, Timothy J. "Economics and Voting in Russia." Post-Soviet Affairs 12, no. 4 (October 1996): 289–317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1060586x.1996.10641427.
Full text
13
PASHTOVA, Lelya G. "Investment opportunities for venture funds in the economics of mobilization." Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice 21, no. 11 (November 29, 2022): 2060–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.24891/ea.21.11.2060.
Full textAbstract:
Subject. The article considers the economic development of Russia and venture capital investment in the Russian Federation. Objectives. The focus is on identifying the specific nature of investing activity in Russia and venture investment to underpin the advantages of using venture funds in financing the economics of mobilization. Methods. The study rests on general scientific and special methods of scientific knowledge, such as systems and comparative analysis, functional and structural analysis. Results. The paper analyzed the main macroeconomic indicators, the indicators characterizing the resources for investment in Russia, identified the specifics of using the venture capital and problematic aspects of its development. I investigated investment opportunities for attracting venture capital in conditions of economics of mobilization. Conclusions. The analysis revealed the need to create conditions for the development of domestic economic system, increase the role of public administration, invest in replacing the imported technologies and products with domestic ones. It also defined the key role of enterprises operating in the military-industrial complex in innovative development and economic security. The venture financing in the military-industrial complex, support to high-tech enterprises will enable redirecting investments to the development of a self-sufficient high-tech system of the economics of mobilization.
14
Benzell, Seth G., and Guillermo Lagarda. "Can Russia Survive Economic Sanctions?" Asian Economic Papers 16, no. 3 (November 2017): 78–120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/asep_a_00552.
Full textAbstract:
Motivated by recent events, we study the welfare impact of extreme sanctions regimes on Russia. To do so, we model the demographic and fiscal transitions of the Russian Federation under free trade and autarky. Unlike previous studies of sanctions, our paper utilizes a large-scale overlapping generations model with productivity growth, demographic change, region-specific policies, and an energy sector. This model is uniquely suited to understanding the long-term impacts of different trade and fiscal regimes. This paper investigates the most dramatic sanctions possible, forcing Russia into long-term autarky under a variety of scenarios. The scenarios differ with regard to the sanction's effect on the energy sector, labor productivity, and the enactment of Russian capital controls. We find that elderly Russians are hurt the most by sanctions. When Russia seizes foreign assets, this is in part because of lower interest rates on the assets of retirees. When the sanctions also reduce Russian government energy revenues, the elderly are hurt through increased consumption taxation. In all scenarios but the most benign, all existing generations are made worse off.
15
Avtonomov, Vladimir S. "West–Russia–West: The circulation of economic ideas." Russian Journal of Economics 7, no. 1 (March 31, 2021): 1–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.32609/j.ruje.7.66257.
Full textAbstract:
The paper serves as an introduction to the RuJE special issue on the circulation of economic ideas between Russia and the West. This circulation is a contentious issue, especially among Russian economists. In this article a specific pattern of West–Russia–West transfer is investigated. The pattern suggests that experiencing strong influence from the West, leading Russian economists developed and modified Western economic theories, adapting them to specific Russian political, ideological and cultural circumstances. As a result, they exerted a certain influence over the next generations of Western economists. Among these circumstances the paper mentions moral and religious factors, the peasant question, the special influence of Marxism, the development of mathematics and statistics in Russia in the 1890s–1920s, and the unique experience of building a planned economy.
16
Balabkins, Nicholas W. "The Piratisation of Russia: Russian Reform Goes Awry." Comparative Economic Studies 50, no. 4 (December 2008): 697–700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/ces.2008.26.
Full text
17
Pavlova, Yu A., N. K. Izteleuova, V. V. Shabanova, and N. I. Galiullina. "DIGITAL ECONOMICS RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN." Bulletin USPTU Science education economy Series economy 3, no. 33 (2020): 47–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.17122/2541-8904-2020-3-33-47-56.
Full textAbstract:
The article analyzes trends in the development of digitalization of the economy of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan; reveals the regional aspect of the state of digital transformation of the Russian economy; examines the correlation of the digital economy of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan. Digital transformation of the economy, and in particular the bilateral cooperation plan between the Ministry of industry and trade of the Russian Federation and the Ministry digital development, defense and aerospace industry of Kazakhstan in the field of industrial and scientific-technical cooperation, promotes more effective engagement of countries in all regions. In the sphere of building a digital economy, cooperation between countries can have an emergent effect. An important component of the transition to the digital economy is the exchange of experience and accumulated knowledge at the interstate level. Russia and Kazakhstan, as strategic partners, have many points of contact in the field of digital economy. The authors noted the need for an integrated approach to the digital economy development in Russia and Kazakhstan, both at the microeconomic and at the macroeconomic level, the features of the digital economy in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan, the basic characteristics of the directions of the state support in the field of digital economy, as well as the criteria of selection of projects, explored the actors involved in the creation of the digital economy, able to organize meetings of various institutions, ready to implement advanced information and communication solutions in various spheres of life. The paper analyzes the areas of cooperation between the Russian Federation and the Republic of Kazakhstan on the development of information and digital technologies. Both in Russia and Kazakhstan, serious work is being done in the field of digitalization, programs have been adopted at the state level, and detailed schemes for moving the economy into a digital future are being developed. The creation of infrastructure for the digital economy implies a constant exchange of experience, the creation of a common digital agenda, to ensure technological compatibility of the two countries' actions. Digital transformation requires people who have a clear understanding of how to integrate new digital methods and processes into existing ways of working. Key words: digital economy, e-management, digital players, Russia, Kazakhstan, transactions, information, technology, infrastructure, digitalization, Internet commerce, digital revolution, big data, technological innovation, innovation industry, information and communication technologies.
18
Labinskaya, I. "Russia: Society of Risks?" World Economy and International Relations, no. 10 (2011): 84–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2011-10-84-92.
Full textAbstract:
In May 2011, IMEMO held a theoretical discussion on the challenges and risks to the stability of Russia. The theses for contemplation were presented by E. Gontmakher, Doctor of Economics and Deputy Director of IMEMO, and N. Zagladin, Doctor of History and Head IMEMO Center for comparative economic and social studies (CESPI). During the discussion of the actual problems of modern Russia the participants proposed a number of extremely important considerations: 1) in the socio-political terms, Russia is among the unfavorable countries of the world, the main indicators of this situation are presented; 2) the ideological-political terms are also bleak: the Russian society is riven by ethno-national, religious, clan and other lines of demarcation which create strong risk of confrontations between different groups of the population; 3) as for the factors of globalization, Russia is not best fit into the globalized world economy.
19
Sobolev, Alexander, Alexander Kurakin, Vladimir Pakhomov, and Irina Trotsuk. "Cooperation in Rural Russia: Past, Present and Future." Мир России 27, no. 1 (February 24, 2018): 65–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/1811-038x-2018-27-1-65-89.
Full textAbstract:
Alexander Sobolev – Doctor of Science in Economics, Professor, Russian University of Cooperation. Address: 12/30, V.Voloshina St., Mytishchi, Moscow Region, 141014, Russian Federation. E-mail: sobolev-alekc@mail.ru
Alexander Kurakin – Senior Researcher, Laboratory for Studies in Economic Sociology, National Research University Higher School of Economics; Senior Researcher, Center for Agrarian Studies, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA). Address: 11, Myasnitskaya St., Moscow, 101000, Russian Federation. E-mail: akurakin@hse.ru
Vladimir Pakhomov – Doctor of Science in Economics, Professor, Russian University of Cooperation. Address: 12/30, V.Voloshina St., Mytishchi, Moscow Region, 141014, Russian Federation. E-mail: vmpahomov@yandex.ru
Irina Trotsuk – Doctor of Science in Sociology, Senior Researcher, Center for Agrarian Studies, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Associate Professor, RUDN University. Address: 82, Vernadskogo Av., Moscow, 119571, Russian Federation. E-mail: irina.trotsuk@yandex.ru
Citation: Sobolev A., Kurakin A., Pakhomov V., Trotsuk I. (2018) Cooperation in Rural Russia: Past, Present and Future. Mir Rossii, vol. 27, no 1, pp. 65–89. DOI: 10.17323/1811-038X-2018-27-1-65-89
The authors consider cooperation as a specific, alternative form of economic organization to the standard business firm within a market economy, and focus on agricultural cooperation in Russia. First, the article engages with the key milestones of the history of cooperation in Russia: (1) the first attempts to establish cooperative organizations before the Russian Revolution (agricultural societies, agricultural partnerships and credit cooperatives) which gave the poor rural population a chance to improve living standards and ensured promising prospects for the long-term development of cooperation in all forms; (2) the dependent forms of consumer and production cooperation under the Soviet regime that deprived all collective forms of their true cooperative nature. In the second part of the article, the authors describe the current state of the cooperative movement in the Russian countryside and identify its basic features, such as opposition to family farming and the state capitalist tendencies of the concentration and vertical integration in the form of agroholdings; state rural cooperation policies which aim to promote and financially support small farming including the development of rural cooperatives; the number and types of cooperatives in the countryside; the reasons for debates on cooperation legislation; the viability of the main types of agricultural cooperatives (production, consumer, credit cooperation). Finally, the authors emphasize that cooperation in contemporary Russia does not fit the classic Western scheme of cooperative development and still has to overcome a number of substantial challenges (the soviet legacy, lack of bottom-up initiatives, the ideological and economic dominance of large-scale farming, poor academic expertise in the field of cooperation studies).
20
Mietule, I., V. Komarova, I. Ostrovska, S. Ignatyevs, and B. Heimanis. "Economic texts as a reflection of the social reality of the transition period in Latvia and Russia." RUDN Journal of Sociology 22, no. 1 (March 3, 2022): 168–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2022-22-1-168-185.
Full textAbstract:
The goal of the study is to compare the reflection of Latvias and Russias transition to the market economy in economic texts. The object of the research is Latvian and Russian textbooks on economics (N = 61) of three generations (1990s, 2000s and 2010s) in the Daugavpils University library. The first such textbooks were published in 1993, and the last ones - in 2015. Although the starting point of the analysis is the translation of Samuelsons textbook (1964), which is beyond the time scope of the research, this book is necessary for a deeper analysis of the textbooks on economics. The research was conducted with the descriptive analysis and case study method applied in the framework of the linguistic discourse analysis based on Webers methodology of cultural determinism. The results of the research showed that in the 1990s, the economic discourse of the USA was actively borrowed in Latvia and Russia; however, the business culture of the USA differs significantly from the business culture of our countries. The linguistic discourse analysis allowed to reveal the conceptual challenges of the contemporary economic science in Latvia and Russia: despite as if the existence of some general economic theory, in reality even basic economic processes are often explained in different conceptual systems depending on the beliefs of the economic texts authors. Considering the social-economic transformations in the past thirty years and earlier periods, the authors emphasize the special importance of critical thinking in the creation, translation and perception of economic texts. This is especially important since there are no reasons to believe that in the 1990s, the cultural component of the economic discourse of Latvia and Russia changed significantly to the market-oriented. Today readers of economic texts have difficulties in their critical assessment, especially of those texts whose authors use emotional terminology.
21
Mel΄nik, Denis. "Revolutionary Economic Reasoning in the Context of Revolution: The Origins and Fate of Bolshevik Economics." Slavic Review 76, no. 3 (2017): 722–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/slr.2017.180.
Full textAbstract:
By February 1917, the handful of future Bolshevik leaders of Russia were scattered all over the globe. Among the few things they had in common was a peculiar vision of the Russian economy and of global economic trends. That vision guided their revolutionary activity. Whether it was “correct” or not, they succeeded. With their grip on power secured, however, their economic reasoning had to confront new challenges, which eventually reshaped the original approach.
22
Shastitko, A. E., and A. L. Zyubina. "Management of Economic Research in Russian Universities: Scientometrics and International Rankings." World of new economy 13, no. 3 (December 3, 2019): 112–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.26794/2220-6469-2019-13-3-112-126.
Full textAbstract:
The authors analyse the environment and its current state of academic research in the field of economics formed in Russia. We considered the publication activity over the past six years of Russian economic, educational organisations as well as the results of the leading Russian universities in the QS and THE subject rankings. Further, we also revealed the connections between the formed conditions in which Russian economics researchers have to work and the results of universities in these rankings. The authors presume the need for expanding approaches to promote Russian economic science on the world stage. Therefore, we discussed current ways of stimulation and evaluation of the activities of Russian economic researchers and proposed that educational system governors use now need to be evaluated and perhaps improved.
23
Tkachenko, Stanislav L. "The study of international political economy in Russia." Communist and Post-Communist Studies 37, no. 1 (March 1, 2004): 111–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2003.12.003.
Full textAbstract:
The author argues that international political economy (IPE), however prominent in the West, has not been established in Russia as an academic discipline. In the Russian policy community, the main debate is between liberal institutionalists, who advocate the country’s integration into the global economy, and the so-called dirigists, who promote relative economic autonomy. These two schools, however, only now begin to find their way in academia. Three main problems impede IPE development in Russia—the excessive separation of political science from economics, the deficit of theoretical generalization, and the weakness of educational curricula.
24
RYABUKHIN, S. N. "NEW FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND TECHNOLOGIES IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBAL TRANSFORMATIONS." Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia 235, no. 3 (2022): 105–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.38197/2072-2060-2022-235-3-105-108.
Full textAbstract:
Vice-President of the VEO of Russia, Vice-President of the International Union of economists, first Deputy Chairman of the budget and financial markets Committee of the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation, Director of the Research Institute “Innovative Financial Instruments and Technologies” (Plekhanov Russian University of Economics), Doctor of Economic Sciences.
25
Gabidullovich Sadykov, Timergaziz, and Razifa Raisovna Stepanova. "Municipal budgets under conditions of economic crises in Russia." SHS Web of Conferences 50 (2018): 01219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20185001219.
Full textAbstract:
The modern stage of Russia’s integration into global community has led to its great dependence on global economy. Russia has become a part of global economy. As all the countries are involved in the world economic functions the size and the consequences of global financial and economic crisis is becoming more and more meaningful for Russian economics as well. The objective of the present paper is to study the general impact of the crisis on Russian budget system and the special impact on the municipal level. The authors consider important to analyse the papers of various economists.
26
Afanasiev, M. P., and N. N. Shash. "Economic reforms in Russia: A new French look (On the book by J. Vercueil “L’Economie politique de la Russie: 1918—2018”)." Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 9 (September 5, 2020): 140–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2020-9-140-155.
Full textAbstract:
The Russian economy and its modern transformations are of great interest to French researchers. The economic history of Russia has become the subject of analysis of the book by J. Vercueil “Political economy of Russia: 1918—2018”. In it, from the standpoint of modern French regulationism (a type of institutionalism ), questions of economic reforms in Russia and their evolution over the past 30 years are considered. The article analyzes three basic concepts of the French author, defining the modern Russian economic system: (1) “Russian disease” as a kind of Dutch disease; (2) rental mode of accumulation; (3) the “Gazprom” way of regulating the economy. In addition, the originality of the use of the term “political economy” is considered with reference to a specific country; Vercueil’s interpretation of the theory of “economics of shortage” by J. Kornai; the mechanism for resolving the problem of arrears in a transition economy, as well as the issues of classification and periodization of economic reforms, their pace and content. The role and place of economic advisers and the IMF in the course of Gaidar reforms are discussed. The article gives a critical analysis of the propositions and hypotheses put forward by the author.
27
Bondarovskaya, Larisa. "Economics of higher education in Russia." SHS Web of Conferences 94 (2021): 01031. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20219401031.
Full textAbstract:
The paper discusses the economic aspect of modern Russian higher education. Education is one of the economic branches. The paper proposes several models of domestic economic policy in the field and some ideas for involving foreign students. The main idea of the paper is that universities have to stop hopping for government resources and act like an economic actor.
28
Sabanti, B. M. "The Logic of Economics in Russia." Vestnik of North-Ossetian State University, no. 3 (2018): 146–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.29025/1994-7720-2018-3-146-148.
Full text
29
Yakusheva, Ulyana. "DEVELOPMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS IN RUSSIA." Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series "Humanitarian and Social Sciences", no. 1 (February 20, 2015): 120–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.17238/issn2227-6564.2015.1.120.
Full text
30
Matveenkov, Denis Olegovich, Vasiliy Alekseevich Kopyl, Valeriya Anatol'evna Popova, Andrey Alekseevich Kinyakin, Yuliya Evgen'evna Shulika, Vladimir Gennad'evich Ivanov, and Vasiliya Borisovna Taisheva. "«Within Sanction Regime»: Problems and Perspectives of Russian Economic and Political Development. The Papers of the “Round Table” of the Lecturers and Students of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia." RUDN Journal of Political Science, no. 2 (December 15, 2016): 87–126. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-1438-2016-2-87-126.
Full textAbstract:
The paper comprises the materials of the “round-table” “Within sanctions regime: problems and perspectives of Russian economic and political development” which was organized by the chair of the comparative politics of the Peoples` Friendship University of Russia (PFUR) and took place on February 20. 2016 on the faculty of the humanities and social sciences. Among the questions discussed within the “round table” were economic and political aftermaths of the sanctions imposed on Russia by the West and Russian countersanctions against the EU, USA and the further perspectives of Russian economic and political development, cooperation with the West. Among the participants of the “round-table” were the lecturers and the students of the political department of the PFUR, the students of the faculty of applied political sciences of the National Research University of Higher School of Economics as well as political experts.
31
Razumnova, L. "Russia-WTO: lnterests of Russian Exporters." World Economy and International Relations, no. 10 (2006): 17–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2006-10-17-23.
Full text
32
Salmin, A. "Russian Federation and Federation in Russia." World Economy and International Relations, no. 3 (2002): 22–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2002-3-22-35.
Full text
33
Salmin, A. "Russian Federation and Federation in Russia." World Economy and International Relations, no. 2 (2002): 40–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2002-2-40-60.
Full text
34
Owen, Catherine. "Making Friends with Neighbors?: Local Perceptions of Russia and China in Kyrgyzstan." China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies 04, no. 03 (January 2018): 457–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s2377740018500185.
Full textAbstract:
Many studies have compared the Russian and Chinese projects currently underway in the Central Asian region, namely the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and the Silk Road Economic Belt (SREB), both of which seek to increase integration with Central Asian states. Yet little attention has been paid to how these endeavors are perceived locally by Central Asians themselves. This article aims to fill this gap by presenting the findings of a comparative discourse analysis of perceptions of Russia and China in online Russian-language media in Kyrgyzstan. The research reveals that while Russia’s role in the region has been seen primarily in political terms and China’s role chiefly in economic terms, these perceptions are changing, and that a growing percentage of articles are devoted to economics in the case of Russia and politics in the case of China. Another finding from this research is that China receives a greater percentage of positive coverage than Russia. It is suggested that as two important poles in the emerging multi-polar world, China and Russia should ensure their respective projects complement, rather than conflict, with one another in the region.
35
Tambovtsev, V., and I. Rozhdestvenskaya. "Higher education reform in russia:international experience and economics." Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 5 (May 20, 2014): 97–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2014-5-97-108.
Full textAbstract:
The paper is aimed to analyze the current higher education reform in Russia in the context of international experience of higher education systems’ performance and economics’ statements. It is shown that changes put into practice are in discrepancy with Russian higher education system institutional environment. As a consequence the achievement of formal resemblance of Russian higher education system with other effective higher education systems will not result in real improvement of its efficiency and quality. Alternative directions for the Russian higher education system transformation are proposed.
36
Schewe, Christoph J. "Russia in the WTO: The Bear on a Leash? Russia in International Trade Disputes and the Added Value of a WTO Membership." Journal of World Trade 47, Issue 6 (December 1, 2013): 1171–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/trad2013039.
Full textAbstract:
After 18 years of negotiations Russia finally became the 156th Member of the WTO. Given the fact that Russia is the last of the 'BRICS' and G20 acceding to this organization, there are considerable hopes that this event might not only modernize the Russian economy but also have a vitalizing effects on other national economies. Apart from potential economic gains there are hopes that the WTO membership will have a favourable effect on transparency and predictability of Russia as an actor in international trade. Notwithstanding, the matter remains controversial as sceptics invoke that instruments provided by the WTO are insufficient for controlling a Russia that in regard to the world's dependency on energy holds a strong political bargaining position. The guiding question thus is whether the WTO can be effective in 'putting the Russian bear on a leash' in the sense of making Russia adhere to trade rules. This article will provide an overview of Russian trade relations and highlights trade disputes with several EU Member States. Hence, it will introduce the changes under WTO Membership and provide a prediction as to how these developments might influence legal structures in the country.
37
Leitzel, Jim, and Anders Aslund. "Economic Transformation in Russia." Southern Economic Journal 61, no. 3 (January 1995): 887. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1061015.
Full text
38
Cohen, Daniell. "Economic transformation in Russia." Economics of Transition 2, no. 2 (June 1994): 259–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.1994.tb00116.x.
Full text
39
Zotova, E. S. "Russia in the Remaking: Civilization, Technogenesis, Economy." Scientific Research of Faculty of Economics. Electronic Journal 13, no. 2 (July 20, 2021): 94–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.38050/2078-3809-2021-13-2-94-104.
Full textAbstract:
The article presents an overview of the plenary conference of the international scientific conference «Russia in the remaking: the Civilization, Technogenesis, the Economy» organized by laboratory of philosophy of economic together with the scientific council «Center of Social Sciences of MSU» held on December 9–11, 2020 in the online format at Faculty of Economics of Lomonosov Moscow State University. Reports that consider from various positions the state and prospects of the Russian society, the Russian economy and, broadly, the Russian civilization, were presented at the plenary session. The presented points of view allow us to take a fresh look at what's happening in the country and in the world in times of COVID-19 challenges.
40
Hoang, Hien Nguyen, A. I. Kashirin, V. V. Strenalyuk, A. S. Semenov, O. Y. Kazenkov, and Yuri A. Chepurko. "Economic Growth by Innovative Development in Energy Sector: The Case of Oil and Gas Export in Russia." International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy 12, no. 5 (September 27, 2022): 466–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.32479/ijeep.13408.
Full textAbstract:
The problem of the "Dutch disease" and the impact of the raw materials complex and its export component on the economic development of Russia are actualized today in the context of the pressure of international economic sanctions on the Russian economy, when the Russian society has to solve problems that were characteristic of the Soviet Union, we mean, first of all, import substitution. In this regard, we need to understand how negatively the impact of energy exports on the socio-economic development of Russia was, while answering the question, was this development abnormal or, if so, due to what factors? Obviously, the crises in Russia in the 1990s and 2009–2011 had a nature weakly associated with raw material specialization. The purpose of this work is to identify the impact of energy exports on the economic development of Russia in retrospect with the construction of a long-term forecast of GDP growth in the Russian Federation in the context of the development of international economic sanctions. Accordingly, the objectives of the study include: to determine how economic growth in the post-Soviet period before the imposition of sanctions was affected by oil exports; secondly, to what extent oil exports influenced innovative development; thirdly, to create a predictive model for the growth of the Russian economy in the context of international sanctions (the situation with the embargo on Russian oil exports to the West). The subject of the study is the impact of oil exports on the socio-economic development of Russia, the object is the macroeconomic situation in Russia before and after international economic sanctions.
41
Abramov, Alexander, and Xenia Akshentseva. "The Determinants of Mutual Funds Performance in Russia." Journal of Corporate Finance Research / Корпоративные Финансы | ISSN: 2073-0438 9, no. 2 (July 8, 2015): 37–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.17323/j.jcfr.2073-0438.9.2.2015.37-53.
Full textAbstract:
Ksenia Akshentseva is a junior researcher at the Institute of Applied Economic Research of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration under the President of the Russian Federation. Email ksakshentceva@gmail.com
Alexander Abramov is a candidate of economic sciences, a leading researcher at the Institute of Applied Economic Research of the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Service under the President of the Russian Federation, Professor of the Department of the Stock Market and the Investment Market, National Research University "Higher School of Economics". Email: ae_abramov@mail.ru
Despite 19 years of the existence of mutual funds in Russia, their performance and effectiveness remain not deeply investigated subjects. The deficit of academic research has a negative influence on the investors’ and regulator’s attitude towards the collective investment market in Russia. In contrast to many other countries oriented on the development of internal stock market, collective investment in Russia does not yet play an active role in the mobilization of internal private savings.This article intends to partially make up for the lack of knowledge about the economy of mutual funds in Russia. It presents the analysis of three measures of mutual fund performance in Russia: the share return, net flow and management company fee. The analysis is based on a unique dataset which contains information about characteristics of 755 mutual funds and covers a 13 year period of the existence of the collective investment sector in Russia. The mutual fund return is able to outperform inflation, return on government bonds and return on the 50/50 strategy. During the periods 2000-2013 and 2008-2013 the abnormal return, net flow and management company fee have followed the same regularity as their foreign counterparts. Thus, mutual funds are one of the most important players in the Russian financial market. We also showed that for the successful development of collective investment in Russia it is necessary to increase the scale of operations, cost management effectiveness and transparency
42
Labinskaya, I. "Russia: Society of Risks? (the end)." World Economy and International Relations, no. 11 (2011): 97–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2011-11-97-104.
Full textAbstract:
This is the continuation of a theoretical discussion (see №10, 2011). The participants supported the points stated by E. Gontmakher, Doctor of Economics and Deputy Director of IMEMO, and N. Zagladin, Doctor of Histoty and head IMEMO Center for comparative economic and social studies (CESPI). The problems of possible and necessary transformation of Russia in the field of economics, of the society (including ethno-religious relations), of the political life of the country, as well as of the challenges of a new phase of development of the modern society were touched upon.
43
Simachev, Yu V., A. A. Fedyunina, and N. A. Gorodny. "Global advanced manufacturing markets — a new opportunity for Russia’s technological upgrade." Journal of the New Economic Association 53, no. 1 (2022): 202–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2022-53-1-10.
Full textAbstract:
New technologies, including Industry 4.0, are rapidly changing traditional and high-tech industries, and forming the advanced manufacturing sector within the industrial complex. By now Russia has been characterized by a modest presence in the world advanced manufacturing markets – Russia’ share is less than 0.6% in certain markets and less than 0.4% in global advanced manufacturing. This is partially explained by the scarce commodity range in the Russian export basket, which determines weak representation of Industry 4.0 goods. Large part in the Russian advanced manufacturing exports is traditional for the Russian economy goods — airplanes, turbojet engines, fuel rods. However, we observe positive structural changes in Russian exports caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Russia has increased exports of goods with bio- and additive technologies, optoelectronics. It seems that the entry to new advanced manufacturing markets for Russia can form the basis for long-term growth. International experience shows that advanced manufacturing exports are often supported by advanced manufacturing imports. We find that Russian economy significantly underutilizes this channel. Although Russian advanced manufacturing imports are gradually growing, it is focused primarily on final consumer goods. We consider industrial robots as a case of advanced manufacturing imports that deserves special attention as a widespread cross-cutting technology that can significantly transform the technological level of industries. Our estimates show that, although the robotics market in Russia is relatively small and has low growth rates relatively to investment in fixed assets, companies importing industrial robots are larger and more productive. This evidence allows us to determine the import of industrial robotics as one of the priority directions of modernization of the Russian manufacturing. Based on the analysis we identify and discuss three growth opportunities for Russia in global advanced manufacturing: 1) support of exports of services in optoelectronics and ICT through the use of accumulated human capital and competencies and taking into account fast transformation of business models in industry, 2) support of exports of biotechnology products, taking into account positive reputational effects and expanding Russian pharmaceutical exports under the COVID-19 pandemic; 3) support of technology companies in wide number of advanced manufacturing taking into account current favorable environment for the birth of tech startups in Russia.
44
Petrov, Artur, and Daria Petrova. "Economics of high-rise construction: the feasibility of skyscrapers building in the Russian cities." E3S Web of Conferences 33 (2018): 03056. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183303056.
Full textAbstract:
The article considers the economic aspects of constructing high-rise buildings in the world and in Russia. Data on the number of high-rise buildings in Russian cities with a million population are presented. It is proved that interest in high-rise construction in Russia has been formed only in Moscow and partly in St. Petersburg and Yekaterinburg. The analysis showed that the reason for this is the expensiveness of high-rise construction. According to the enlarged macro-calculation, the cost of building 1 m2of the area of the Federation Towers complex (Moscow City) is about 2710 $/m2. Practically a possibility of return on investments in the foreseeable time interval exists only in Moscow. For the regions of Russia this task is rather complicated. Population density in regional Russian cities is quite low, business entities do not have the necessary financial resources for investing in high-rise construction, and investments from abroad absent.
45
Palkina, Elena S. "Intellectual capital formation in new economic space based on high-speed transport systems." Transportation systems and technology 2, no. 4 (December 15, 2016): 128–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/transsyst201624128-138.
Full textAbstract:
Introduction: The competitiveness of national transport systems in the global economy is primarily determined by their innovativeness, which influences the quality, cost of transport services and, as a consequence, the degree of customer satisfaction. The innovative capacity of an economic agent, in turn, depends largely on the size and quality of intellectual capital. Method: The "Economics of Transport of high speeds". Result: In modern Russia the vector of transport system innovation development is determined by such an important indicator of the transportation process, as the delivery time of goods and passengers. An obvious consequence of the actualization of this vector of development of national transport system is the need of the Russian economy in its own personnel and scientific support for high-speed traffic development projects. One of the leading transport universities of the Russian Federation, training industry experts, is the Petersburg State Transport University. Scientific and personnel potential of the University can be successfully used in the formation of the Eurasian economic space high-tech network of high-speed traffic. Since 2015, in order to generate the intellectual capital for the Russian transport industry development, needed for creation of the national competitive innovative transport system, a new master's program "High-speed transport economics" has been implemented on the basis of the Transportation Economics Department, the PGUPS. This program is aimed at proactive quality training of competitive highly qualified specialists with innovative thinking, modern in-depth knowledge, skills and competences in the field of economics and management of transport companies (all modes of transport). Conclusion: The socio-economic impact as a result of the implementation of the program is that the use of intellectual capital and organizational and managerial skills of its graduates for creation in Russia the competitive high-speed intelligent transport system will help to speed up delivery of goods and passengers, increase population mobility, enhance the economic and socio-cultural integration of the regions of the country, the sustainable territorial development of Russia, growth of labor productivity, improvement of transport services quality, the competitiveness of the national transport system in the global market of transport services, increase the use of transport-transit potential of the Russian Federation, its budget revenues from the export of transport services.
46
Brodskiy, Vitaliy. "SOCIAL ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN MODERN RUSSIA." Russian Journal of Management 8, no. 1 (May 22, 2020): 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.29039/2409-6024-2020-8-1-1-5.
Full textAbstract:
The current experience of countries around the world and increasing Russian integration into the international community of Economics actualize the phenomenon of social entrepreneurship as a method of socio-economic functioning of commercial and non-commercial companies, thanks to which the use of innovative methods of business processes is synthesized with the achievement of constant payback in order to solve social problems.
47
Pechishcheva, Lyudmila A., and Konstantin A. Korneev. "ENERGY AND ECONOMICS AS A KEY PERSPECTIVE DIRECTION OF RUSSIA-INDIA COOPERATION." RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Eurasian studies. History. Political science. International relations, no. 3 (2020): 29–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.28995/2686-7648-2020-3-29-39.
Full textAbstract:
The implementation of the Greater Eurasian Partnership concept is hard to imagine without the development of both Russia-China and RussiaIndia cooperation. It is obvious that in the near future India will become one of the dynamic centers of economic development not only in South Asia, but also in the world, so the interest in this country among Russian and foreign scientists is only increasing. Moreover, India is one of the traditional trading partners of Russia (previously – the USSR), and it is not just about military-technical and humanitarian cooperation. Currently, new opportunities are emerging, so the analysis of the current state and prospects of Russian-Indian cooperation is very relevant. The intensification of multilateral interaction within the framework of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization is an effective tool for the conducting Russian interests in the Central and South Asian regions. India and Pakistan, that became the fully legitimate members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization in 2017, are concerned not only in expanding their political, economic and humanitarian influence, but also in carrying out investment projects under the auspices of the Organization. Russia-India relations, that somewhat slowed down in the 1990s, are getting now a new boost thanks to the opening prospects for regional integration that contributes to strengthening the already established partnership areas in such important areas as the economy and energy.
48
Meister, S. "Germany and Russia: Delimitated Partners." World Economy and International Relations, no. 7 (2013): 22–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.20542/0131-2227-2013-7-22-28.
Full textAbstract:
The estrangement is surging up in relations between Germany and Russia. Expectations of the "Partnership for Modernization" in Berlin are deceived. For the German part, it seems most important to reform the Russian political system through economic cooperation, whereas, in contrast, Russia is interested in economic partnership itself and in investment promotion. The lack of the legal regulation, and the growing state influence on economy in Russia hedge the economic partnership. Berlin has no concept of ways to affect the reform process in Russia. The renewal of the policy line towards Russia is needed. If Germany wants to facilitate the integration of Russia into Europe, Berlin must work out a new approach in the relationship with Moscow, focused less on elites and more on the civil society.
49
Johnson, Simon. "Privatizing Russia." Comparative Economic Studies 38, no. 2-3 (July 1996): 147–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/ces.1996.21.
Full text
50
Rutland, Peter. "Privatizing Russia." Economics of Planning 29, no. 3 (1996): 233–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00683953.
Full text