Books on the topic 'East Asian developmental welfare state'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: East Asian developmental welfare state.

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 35 books for your research on the topic 'East Asian developmental welfare state.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse books on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Kwon, Huck-ju, ed. Transforming the Developmental Welfare State in East Asia. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230523661.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Kwon, Huck-ju. Transforming the developmental welfare state in East Asia. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

1960-, Goodman Roger, White Gordon 1942-, and Kwon Huck-ju, eds. The East Asian welfare model: Welfare Orientalism and the state. London: Routledge, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Alan, Walker, and Wong Chack-kie, eds. East Asian welfare regimes in transition: From Confucianism to globalisation. Bristol, UK: Policy Press, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Haddad, Mary Alice, Stevan Harrell, Joanna I. Lewis, and Ashley Esarey. Greening East Asia: The Rise of the Eco-Developmental State. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2020.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Haddad, Mary Alice, Stevan Harrell, Joanna I. Lewis, and Ashley Esarey. Greening East Asia: The Rise of the Eco-Developmental State. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2020.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Varieties of social policy: East Asian welfare capitalism in comparative perspective. Singapore: Dept. of Sociology, National University of Singapore, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Richard, Boyd, and Ngo Tak-Wing 1962-, eds. Asian states: Beyond the developmental perspective. New York, N.Y: RoutledgeCurzon, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Im, Hye-ran. Tong Asia palchŏn kukka model ŭi chaegusŏng: Revisiting East Asian developmental state model. Sŏul: Sŏul Taehakkyo Ch'ulp'an Munhwawŏn, 2018.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Sang-in, Chŏn, ed. Hanʼguk hyŏndaesa: Chinsil kwa haesŏk. Kyŏnggi-do Pʻaju-si: Nanam Chʻulpʻan, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Huck-ju, Kwon, and United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, eds. Transforming the developmental welfare state in East Asia. Houndmills [England]: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Fleckenstein, Timo, and Soohyun Christine Lee. A Social Investment Turn in East Asia? Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198790488.003.0024.

Full text
Abstract:
The welfare states of Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan were built by conservative elites to serve the project of late industrialization, and for this reason the East Asian developmental welfare state focused its resources on those who were deemed most important for economic development (especially male industrial workers). Starting in the 1990s and increasingly since the 2000s, the developmental welfare state has experienced a far-reaching transformation, including the expansion of family policy to address the post-industrial challenges of female employment participation and low fertility. This chapter assesses social investment policies in East Asia, with a focus on family policy and on the South Korean case, where the most comprehensive rise of social investment policies were observed.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Walker, Alan, and Chack-kie Wong, eds. East Asian Welfare Regimes in Transition. Bristol University Press, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.46692/9781847421241.

Full text
Abstract:
This book explores the Chinese and South-East Asian welfare systems, providing an up-to-date assessment of their character and development. In particular, it examines their underlying assumptions and the impact of the processes of globalisation. As well as specific case studies, there is also a comparative analysis of Eastern and Western welfare states.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

White, Gordon, Huck-Ju Kwon, and Roger Goodman. East Asian Welfare Model: Welfare Orientalism and the State. Taylor & Francis Group, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

White, Gordon, Huck-Ju Kwon, and Roger Goodman. East Asian Welfare Model: Welfare Orientalism and the State. Taylor & Francis Group, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

White, Gordon, Huck-Ju Kwon, and Roger Goodman. East Asian Welfare Model: Welfare Orientalism and the State. Taylor & Francis Group, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

East Asian Welfare Model: Welfare Orientalism and the State. Routledge, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

White, Gordon, Huck-Ju Kwon, and Roger Goodman. East Asian Welfare Model: Welfare Orientalism and the State. Taylor & Francis Group, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

White, Gordon, Huck-Ju Kwon, and Roger Goodman. East Asian Welfare Model: Welfare Orientalism and the State. Taylor & Francis Group, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Kwon, Huck-Ju. Transforming the Developmental Welfare State in East Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Kwon, H. Transforming the Developmental Welfare State in East Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Kwon, H. Transforming the Developmental Welfare State in East Asia. Palgrave Macmillan Limited, 2016.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Ngo, Tak-Wing, and Richard Boyd. Asian States: Beyond the Developmental Perspective. Taylor & Francis Group, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Ngo, Tak-Wing, and Richard Boyd. Asian States: Beyond the Developmental Perspective. Taylor & Francis Group, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Ngo, Tak-Wing, and Richard Boyd. Asian States: Beyond the Developmental Perspective. Taylor & Francis Group, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Ngo, Tak-Wing, and Richard Boyd. Asian States: Beyond the Developmental Perspective. Taylor & Francis Group, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Goodman, Roger. The East Asian Welfare Model: Welfare Orientalism and the State (Esrc Pacific Asia Programme (Series).). Routledge, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Goodman, Roger. The East Asian Welfare Model: Welfare Orientalism and the State (Esrc Pacific Asia Programme (Series).). Routledge, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Kwon, Huck-ju. Transforming the Developmental Welfare State in East Asia (Social Policy in a Development Context). Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Sumner, Andy. Great Transformations. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198792369.003.0004.

Full text
Abstract:
In this chapter we revisit this first era of classical developmentalism and industrialization in South East Asia from the late 1960s to the early to mid 1980s. The chapter argues that in keeping with the discussion of Lewis and Kuznets, the outcomes were impressive, and the end of classical developmentalism in South East Asia was due to global forces and the mode of global incorporation. The state was important in managing distributional tensions to address the Kuznetsian upswing of inequality that structural transformation unleashes. Specifically, the focus on agriculture and rural development ensured a social basis—improvements in welfare for the rural masses—that compensated for democracy. Agricultural development also supported industrialization. It is important to note, though, that absence of elite conflict, which facilitated structural transformation and inclusive growth in the region, had a high price in terms of the curtailing of political opposition, and political freedoms.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Bellamy, Alex J. The Developmental Trading State. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198777939.003.0005.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter demonstrates that the downwards pressure that state consolidation placed on mass violence was amplified by the type of state that emerged. Across East Asia, governments came to define themselves as “developmental” or “trading” states whose principal purpose was to grow the national economy and thereby improve the economic wellbeing of their citizens. Governments with different ideologies came to embrace economic growth and growing the prosperity of their populations as the principal function of the state and its core source of legitimacy. Despite some significant glitches along the way the adoption of the developmental trading state model has proven successful. Not only have East Asian governments succeeded in lifting hundreds of millions of people out of poverty, the practices and policy orientations dictated by this model helped shift governments and societies away from belligerent practices towards postures that prioritized peace and stability. This reinforced the trend towards greater peacefulness.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Fairbrother, Malcolm. Development: Institutional Perspectives. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.146.

Full text
Abstract:
There are three key literatures on the political economy of development that all emphasize the importance of institutions, but in different and somewhat contradictory ways. These literatures focus on developmental states, good governance, and political economic pathways. The developmental states literature is based largely on case studies of East Asian countries that have, since about 1950, largely “caught up” to the already developed nations in Europe, North America, and the Antipodes. The central conclusion of this literature has been that successful late development requires a competent, committed state bureaucracy, independent enough to be capable of imposing its will on domestic businesspeople, but also sufficiently connected to them so as to make good decisions about what will to impose. The literature focusing on good governance, based largely in economics, also sees state actions and characteristics as keys to positive development outcomes. But while the developmental states literature argues that states need to play an interventionist role in “governing” markets (including not infrequently restricting them), the good governance literature usually looks more favorably on free markets. Finally, research in the political economic pathways literature tends to examine much longer periods of time than the other two literatures, and typically emphasizes economic and political developmental outcomes as joint products of differences in the historical trajectories followed by different countries. The key explanatory variables for this literature are a country’s circumstances in the colonial period, and levels and types of social inequality.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Looney, Kristen E. Mobilizing for Development. Cornell University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501748844.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
This book tackles the question of how countries achieve rural development and offers a new way of thinking about East Asia's political economy that challenges the developmental state paradigm. Through a comparison of Taiwan (1950s–1970s), South Korea (1950s–1970s), and China (1980s–2000s), the book shows that different types of development outcomes—improvements in agricultural production, rural living standards, and the village environment—were realized to different degrees, at different times, and in different ways. The book argues that rural modernization campaigns, defined as policies demanding high levels of mobilization to effect dramatic change, played a central role in the region and that divergent development outcomes can be attributed to the interplay between campaigns and institutions. The analysis departs from common portrayals of the developmental state as wholly technocratic and demonstrates that rural development was not just a byproduct of industrialization. The book's research is based on several years of fieldwork in Asia and makes a unique contribution by systematically comparing China's development experience with other countries. Relevant to political science, economic history, rural sociology, and Asian Studies, the book enriches our understanding of state-led development and agrarian change.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Kwon, Hyeong-ki. Changes by Competition. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198866060.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
By tracing historically the evolution of Korean state-led capitalism and comparing it with other economies, this book criticizes prevalent theories including neoliberalism, the developmental state, and institutionalism, while proposing a theoretical alternative focusing on endogenous changes and institutional adaptability through elite competition within the state. Unlike the arguments of the neoliberals, the state can still play an active role in reconstituting the national economy in globalization. The Korean state successfully fosters economic growth by nurturing industrial commons even in globalization, rather than change toward a neoliberal free market system. In order to better account for sustainable economic growth over a long time, this book emphasizes institutional adaptability through elite competition, rather than offering neoliberal celebrations of the free market and the statist emphasis on the stringent Weberian state. The Korean economy, as well as the East Asian developmental state (DS) economies, could have sustainable development over a long period, not because of an apparent and standardized growth formula, or because of some institutional elements of a stringent Weberian state, but because they have adjusted their methods and strategies of development through competition among elites inside and outside the state, as new challenges, never met with an apparent solution, have continuously emerged. In order to better account for the evolution of state-led developmentalism in Korea, as well as in other countries, this book proposes changes by competition among elites within as well as outside the state, which causes changes in developmentalism and more flexible adjustments in new contexts.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Kalinowski, Thomas. Why International Cooperation is Failing. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198714729.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
Ten years after the global financial crisis of 2008/9 there is widespread scepticism about the ability to curb volatile financial markets and international cooperation in general. Changes in the global rules of finance discussed in the G20 during the last ten years remain limited, and it is doubtful whether they are suitable to help mitigate and manage future crisis to come. This book argues that this failure is not simply the result of bad leadership and clash of national egoisms but rather the result of a much more fundamental competition of capitalisms. US finance-led, EU integration-led, and East Asian state-led capitalism complement each other globally, but at the same time they have conflicting preferences on how to complement their distinct domestic regulations at the international level. This interdependence of capitalist models is both relatively stable but also prone to crisis caused by volatile financial flows, global economic imbalances, and ‘currency wars’. This book shows that regulating international finance is not a technocratic exercise of finetuning the machinery of international institutions but a political process depending on the dynamic of domestic institutions and power relations. If we want to understand international economic cooperation, we need to understand the diversity of domestic dynamics of the different models of capitalism, not just concerning financial markets but also in connected areas such as corporate structure, labour markets, and welfare regimes. Ultimately, international cooperation is both desirable and possible, but needs to go hand in hand with fundamental changes at the domestic level.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography