Books on the topic 'Drone aircraft – Afghanistan – Evaluation'

Martin, Matt J. Predator: The remote-control air war over Iraq and Afghanistan : a pilot's story. Minneapolis: MBI Pub. Co., 2010.

United States. Government Accountability Office. Unmanned aircraft systems: DOD needs to more effectively promote interoperability and improve performance assessments : report to the Subcommittee on Tactical Air and Land Forces, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: U.S. Government Accountability Office, 2005.

Office, General Accounting. Unmanned aerial vehicles: No more Hunter systems should be bought until problems are fixed : report to the Secretary of Defense. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1995.

Office, General Accounting. Unmanned aerial vehicles: Performance of short-range system still in question : report to the Chairman, Legislation and National Security Subcommittee, Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1993.

Office, General Accounting. Unmanned aerial vehicles: More testing needed before production of short-range system : report to the Chairman, Legislation and National Security Subcommittee, Committee on Government Operations, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1992.

Office, General Accounting. Unmanned aerial vehicles: Questionable basis for revisions to Shadow 200 acquisition strategy : report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Military Research and Development, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C. (P.O. Box 37050, Washington, D.C. 20013): The Office, 2000.

Office, General Accounting. Force structure: Opportunities for the Army to reduce risk in executing the military strategy : report to Congressional Committees. Washington, D.C. (P.O. Box 37050, Washington, D.C. 20013): The Office, 1999.

Office, General Accounting. Force structure: Army's efforts to improve efficiency of institutional forces have produced few results : report to Congressional committees. Washington, D.C. (P.O. Box 37050, Washington, D.C. 20013): The Office, 1998.

Office, General Accounting. Force structure: Improved strategic planning can enhance DOD's unmanned aerial vehicles efforts : report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Tactical Air and Land Forces, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C. (P.O. Box 37050, Washington 20013): U.S. General Accounting Office, 2004.

Office, General Accounting. Force structure: Air Force expeditionary concept offers benefits but effects should be assessed : report to congressional committees. Washington, D.C. (P.O. Box 37050, Washington, D.C. 20013): The Office, 2000.

Office, General Accounting. Force structure: Army National Guard Divisions could augment wartime support capability : report to the Secretary of the Army. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1995.

Office, General Accounting. Force structure: Streamlining plans could enable Navy to reduce personnel below fiscal year 1999 goal : report to congressional committees. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1997.

Office, General Accounting. Force structure: Issues involving the base force : report to Congressional Requesters. Washington, D.C: U.S. General Accounting Office, 1992.

Office, General Accounting. Force structure: Army is integrating active and reserve combat forces, but challenges remain : report to congressional committees. Washington, D.C. (P.O. Box 37050, Washington, D.C. 20013): The Office, 2000.

Office, General Accounting. Force structure: Army support forces can meet two-conflict strategy with some risks : report to Congressional committees. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1997.

Office, General Accounting. Force structure: A-76 not applicable to Air Force 38th Engineering Installation Wing plan : report to congressional requesters. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1999.

Office, General Accounting. Force structure: Army needs to further test the light infantry division : report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Military Construction, Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1988.

Office, General Accounting. Force structure: Army needs to further test the light infantry division : report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Military Construction, Committee on Appropriations, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1988.

Drone Enigma. Koehler Books, 2014.

McManus, Ron. Drone Enigma: A Jake Palmer Novel. Bublish, Incorporated, 2021.

McManus, Ron. The Drone Enigma: A Jake Palmer Novel. Bublish, Incorporated, 2021.

Scahill, Jeremy, and The Staff of The Intercept. Assassination Complex: Inside the Government's Secret Drone Warfare Program. Simon & Schuster, 2016.

The Assassination Complex: Inside the Government's Secret Drone Warfare Program. Simon & Schuster, 2017.

The assassination complex: Inside the government's secret drone warfare program. 2016.

Bowden, Mark. The Three Battles of Wanat: And Other True Stories. Grove Press, 2017.

Bowden, Mark. The three battles of Wanat: And other true stories. 2016.

Unmanned: Drones, data, and the illusion of perfect warfare. Little, Brown and Company, 2015.

Arkin, William M. Unmanned: Drones, Data, and the Illusion of Perfect Warfare. Little Brown & Company, 2015.

Nonproliferation: Improvements needed to better control technology exports for cruise missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles : report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on National Security, Emerging Threats, and International Relations, Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives. Washington, D.C: U.S. General Accounting Office, 2004.

Force structure: Potential exists to further reduce active Air Force personnel : report to congressional committees. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1997.

United States. General Accounting Office., ed. Force structure: A-76 not applicable to Air Force 38th Engineering Installation Wing plan : report to congressional requesters. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1999.

Force structure: Basis for future Army forces in Europe : report to the Chairman, Subcommittee on Military Forces and Personnel, Committee on Armed Services, House of Representative. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1994.

Force structure: Streamlining plans could enable Navy to reduce personnel below fiscal year 1999 goal : report to congressional committees. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1997.

Force structure: Issues involving the base force : report to Congressional Requesters. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1993.

Force structure: A-76 not applicable to Air Force 38th Engineering Installation Wing plan : report to congressional requesters. Washington, D.C. (P.O. Box 37050, Washington, D.C. 20013): The Office, 1999.

Force structure: A-76 not applicable to Air Force 38th Engineering Installation Wing plan : report to congressional requesters. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1999.

United States. General Accounting Office, ed. Force structure: A-76 not applicable to Air Force 38th Engineering Installation Wing plan : report to congressional requesters. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1999.

United States. General Accounting Office., ed. Force structure: A-76 not applicable to Air Force 38th Engineering Installation Wing plan : report to congressional requesters. Washington, D.C: The Office, 1999.