Relevant bibliographies by topics / Drip irrigation

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers
  6. Reports

Academic literature on the topic 'Drip irrigation'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 19 February 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Drip irrigation.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Drip irrigation"

1

A, Shilpa. "Smart Drip Irrigation System." International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development Volume-2, Issue-4 (June 30, 2018): 1560–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.31142/ijtsrd12888.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Bryla, David R., Elizabeth Dickson, Robert Shenk, R. Scott Johnson, Carlos H. Crisosto, and Thomas J. Trout. "Influence of Irrigation Method and Scheduling on Patterns of Soil and Tree Water Status and Its Relation to Yield and Fruit Quality in Peach." HortScience 40, no. 7 (December 2005): 2118–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.40.7.2118.

Full text
Abstract:
A 3-year study was done to determine the effects of furrow, microspray, surface drip, and subsurface drip irrigation on production and fruit quality in mature `Crimson Lady' peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] trees. Furrow and microspray irrigations were scheduled weekly or biweekly, which is common practice in central California, while surface and subsurface drip irrigations were scheduled daily. Trees were maintained at similar water potentials following irrigation by adjusting water applications as needed. Tree size and fruit number were normalized among treatments by pruning and thinning each season. Surface and subsurface drip produced the largest fruit on average and the highest marketable yields among treatments. Drip benefits appeared most related to the ability to apply frequent irrigations. Whether water was applied above or below ground, daily irrigations by drip maintained higher soil water content within the root zone and prevented cycles of water stress found between less-frequent furrow and microspray irrigations. With furrow and microsprays, midday tree water potentials reached as low as –1.4 MPa between weekly irrigations and –1.8 MPa between biweekly irrigations, which likely accounted for smaller fruit and lower yields in these treatments. To reduce water stress, more frequent irrigation is probably impractical with furrow systems but is recommended when irrigating during peak water demands by microspray.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Murtiningrum, Murtiningrum, Ilham Nawan Rasyid, Lia Christyaningrum, Erlina Fahrunisa, and Ngadisih Ngadisih. "Performance of Drip and Mist Irrigation to Supply Water for Vegetable." IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 999, no. 1 (March 1, 2022): 012013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/999/1/012013.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Irrigation or water use for agriculture is the biggest water consumer. Reducing water use for irrigation means significantly to water saving. Drip and mist irrigations are methods of water application which consume water more efficiently and more agriculture products produce from same amount of water. This research aimed to assess performance off drip irrigation and mist irrigation to supply irrigation water for vegetables. The vegetables cultivated were spinach, mustard, and water spinach. The indicators employed were discharge, uniformity, dan water productivity. The research results showed that average discharges of drip and mist irrigations were 0.0056 litre/second and 0.0012 litre/second, respectively. The uniformity was measured using distribution uniformity (DU) and Christiansen uniformity index (CU). The DU of drip and mist irrigations were 0.84 and 0.76, respectively. The CU of drip and mist irrigations were 0.76 and 0.82, respectively. The biomass water productivities of spinach, mustard, and water spinach irrigated with drip irrigation were 2.23, 9.51, and 7.92, respectively. The biomass water productivities of spinach, mustard, and water spinach irrigated with mist irrigation were 0.98, 8.70, and 9.10, respectively.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Choi, C., I. Song, S. Stine, J. Pimentel, and C. Gerba. "Role of irrigation and wastewater reuse: comparison of subsurface irrigation and furrow irrigation." Water Science and Technology 50, no. 2 (July 1, 2004): 61–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wst.2004.0089.

Full text
Abstract:
Two different irrigation systems, subsurface drip irrigation and furrow irrigation, are tested to investigate the level of viral contamination and survival when tertiary effluent is used in arid and semi-arid regions. The effluent was injected with bacteriophages of PRD1 and MS2. A greater number of PRD1 and MS2 were recovered from the lettuce in the subsurface drip-irrigated plots as compared to those in the furrow-irrigated plots. Shallow drip tape installation and preferential water paths through cracks on the soil surface appeared to be the main causes of high viral contamination in subsurface drip irrigation plots, which led to the direct contact of the lettuce stems with the irrigation water which penetrated the soil surface. The water use efficiency of the subsurface drip irrigation system was higher than that of the furrow irrigation system. Thus, subsurface drip irrigation is an efficient irrigation method for vegetable crops in arid and semi-arid regions if viral contamination can be reduced. Deeper installation of drip tapes, frequent irrigations, and timely harvests based on cumulative heat units may further reduce health risks by ensuring viral die-off under various field conditions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Zhang, Yu, Yongjun Zhu, and Baolin Yao. "A study on interannual change features of soil salinity of cotton field with drip irrigation under mulch in Southern Xinjiang." PLOS ONE 15, no. 12 (December 30, 2020): e0244404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244404.

Full text
Abstract:
The drip irrigation under mulch has become one of significant supporting technologies for cotton industry development in Xinjiang, and has shown the good economic and ecological benefits. With the rapid development of society and economy in Southern Xinjiang, the conventional mode of large-quota winter and spring irrigation, salt leaching and alkali decreasing is difficult to support sustainable development of land and water resources in Southern Xinjiang. This study tries to adjust soil moisture and salt content regulation mode of massive water salt leaching and drip irrigation under mulch in the non-growing period of cotton field in Southern Xinjiang, explores interannual soil salinity change features of drip irrigation cotton field without winter and spring irrigation, and provides experimental basis for drip irrigation technology under mulch which can reduce and exempt cotton irrigation in winter and spring. According to ET0, the dual-factor complete combination experiment involving 3 irrigating water quotas (I1, I2, I3) and 2 irrigation times (T12, T16) was designed, and 6 treatments were involved in total(I1T12,I2T12,I3T12,I1T16,I2T16 and I3T16). The investigation results of four-year (2012–2015) field positioning experiment showed that, under the condition of “germination under drip irrigation” without winter and spring irrigation, increasing irrigation quota and irrigation times could lower 0-100cm soil salinity accumulation, but the soil salinity accumulation degree was 40-100cm, and less than 0-30cm. In the seedling stage, bud stage, blossom and boll-forming stage, and boll opening stage, the average salinity of 0-100cm soil increased by 39.81%, 31.91%, 26.85% and 29.47%, respectively. Increasing irrigation quota and irrigation times could ease interannual soil salinity accumulation degree of cotton field with drip irrigation under mulch, without winter and spring irrigation. 0-100cm soil salinity before sowing was related to the irrigation quota of cotton in the growing stage of the last year. The larger the irrigation quota was, the smaller the soil salinity before sowing would be. The accumulation amount of soil salinity at the end of growing stage under different treatments was lower than that before sowing. The drip irrigation of cotton under mulch in the growing stage could effectively regulate soil salinity distribution and space-time migration process in the growing stage of cotton. Compared with the beginning of 2012, 0-100cm average soil salinity under 3 irrigation quotas (I1, I2, I3) was 33.66%, 5.60% and 1.24%, respectively. Salt accumulating rates under 12 irrigations and 16 irrigations were 20.66% and 6.33%, respectively. The soil had the risk of salinization when the “germination under drip irrigation” without winter and spring irrigation was used. Such results can provide the reference for prevention and treatment of soil moisture and salt content of cotton field with drip irrigation under mulch in the arid region.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Feibert, Erik B. G., Clinton C. Shock, and Lamont D. Saunders. "A Comparison of Onion Production Under Sprinkler, Subsurface Drip, and Furrow Irrigation." HortScience 30, no. 4 (July 1995): 839A—839. http://dx.doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.30.4.839a.

Full text
Abstract:
Onion yield and grade were compared under sprinkler, subsurface drip, and furrow irrigation in 1992, 1993, and 1994. Furrow-irrigated onions were planted on two double rows on 1.12-m-wide beds at 352,000 seeds/ha. Sprinkler- and drip-irrigated onions were planted in nine single rows on a 2.24-m-wide bed at 432,100 seeds/acre. Drip plots had three drip lines buried 0.10 m deep in each 2.24-m bed. Soil water potential at 0.2-m depth was measured by tensiometers and granular matrix sensors (Watermark Model 200SS, Irrometer Co., Riverside, Calif.). Furrow irrigations were started when the soil water potential at the 0.2-m depth reached –25 kPa. Drip-irrigated onions had soil water potential at the 0.2-m depth kept wetter than –25 kPa by daily replacement of crop evapotranspiration (Etc). Sprinkler irrigations were started when the accumulated Etc reached 25 mm. Sprinkler irrigation resulted in significantly higher onion yield than furrow irrigation in 1993 and 1994. Sprinkler irrigation resulted in higher marketable onion yield than furrow irrigation in 1993. Drip irrigation resulted in significantly higher onion yield than furrow irrigation every year. Drip irrigation resulted in higher marketable onion yield than furrow irrigation in 1992 and 1994. Marketable onion yield was reduced in 1993 due to rot during storage.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Seifzadeh, Ali Reza, Mohammad Reza Khaledian, Mohsen Zavareh, Parisha Shahinrokhsar, and Christos A. Damalas. "European Borage (Borago officinalis L.) Yield and Profitability under Different Irrigation Systems." Agriculture 10, no. 4 (April 20, 2020): 136. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10040136.

Full text
Abstract:
European borage (Borago officinalis L.) is a cultivated medicinal plant in Iran, but common agronomic practices about profitable cultivation are mostly unknown. A 2-yr field experiment (2013 and 2014) was conducted in Guilan Province of northern Iran to evaluate European borage yield and profitability under irrigation with surface and drip irrigation systems. Treatments included (i) rainfed production (I0, control), (ii) single irrigation (I1) applied with surface irrigation alone and drip irrigation alone, and (iii) two irrigations (I2) applied with surface irrigation alone and drip irrigation alone. In 2013, I1 increased flower dry weight by 41.0% and seed weight by 7.1% compared with rainfed European borage, while with I2, the increases in those traits were 23.4% and 0.6%, respectively. In 2014, I1 increased flower dry weight by 78.0% and seed weight by 21.3% compared with rainfed European borage, while the respective increases were 51.8% and 17.3% with I2. On average, drip irrigation provided higher flower dry weight and seed weight by 39.3% and 12.6%, respectively, compared with surface irrigation. Drip irrigation increased variable costs by 165.2% compared with surface irrigation but resulted in increased gross income by 23.2%. Partial budgeting showed that I1 with drip irrigation provided the maximum net profit in both years. Based on the final rate of return, investing in the treatment I1 with drip irrigation was better than investing in the other treatments. Moreover, I1 with drip irrigation showed the highest value of economic water productivity and could be considered for improving the net income of European borage farmers.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Walker, Wynn R. "Drip irrigation manual." Agricultural Water Management 12, no. 1-2 (October 1986): 164–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-3774(86)90018-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Sahu, Sushma, D. K. Surywanshi, M. A. Khan, and Bhedu Prasad Sahu. "Knowledge level of drip irrigation farmers about drip irrigation technology." AGRICULTURE UPDATE 15, no. 4 (November 15, 2020): 311–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.15740/has/au/15.4/311-314.

Full text
Abstract:
The present study was carried out during 2013 in the Durg district of Chhattisgarh state. This study was conducted in randomly selected 8 villages of two purposively selected blocks i.e. Durg and Dhamdha located in Durg district. The aim of this study was to assess the risk orientation and level of knowledge of drip irrigation farmers about drip irrigation technology. A total of 128 respondents including 64 drip irrigation farmers and 64 non-drip irrigation farmers were selected randomly. The data collection was done by the use of interview schedule through personal interview. Data were analyzed with help of suitable statistical tools. The findings revealed that majority of the respondents had high risk bearing capability and having high level of knowledge about equipments fitted in DIS. Majority of the DIF were having high level of knowledge regarding drip irrigation technology.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Bell, A. A., L. Liu, B. Reidy, R. M. Davis, and K. V. Subbarao. "Mechanisms of Subsurface Drip Irrigation-Mediated Suppression of Lettuce Drop Caused by Sclerotinia minor." Phytopathology® 88, no. 3 (March 1998): 252–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1094/phyto.1998.88.3.252.

Full text
Abstract:
Subsurface drip irrigation and associated mandatory minimum tillage practices significantly reduced the incidence of lettuce drop (Sclerotinia minor) and the severity of corky root on lettuce compared with furrow irrigation and conventional tillage. Three possible mechanisms for the drip irrigation-mediated disease suppression were examined in this study: qualitative and quantitative differences in the soil microflora under furrow and subsurface drip irrigation; their antagonism and potential bio-control effects on S. minor; and the physical distribution of soil moisture and temperature relative to the two irrigation methods. To determine if the suppressive effects under subsurface drip irrigation were related to changes in soil microflora, soils were assayed for actinomycetes, bacteria, and fungi during the spring and fall seasons. The effects of the irrigation methods on microbial populations were nearly identical during both seasons. In the spring season, the total number of fungal colonies recovered on potato dextrose agar amended with rose Bengal generally was greater in soils under drip irrigation than under furrow irrigation, but no such differences were observed during the fall. Numbers of actinomycetes and bacteria were not significantly different between irrigation methods during either season. No interaction between sampling time and irrigation methods was observed for any of the microbial populations during both seasons. Thus, the significant effect of sampling time observed for actinomycete and bacterial populations during the spring was most likely not caused by the irrigation treatments. There were also no qualitative differences in the three groups of soil microflora between the irrigation treatments. Even though some fungal, actinomycete, and bacterial isolates suppressed mycelial growth of S. minor in in vitro assays, the isolates came from both subsurface drip- and furrow-irrigated soils. In in planta assays, selected isolates failed to reduce the incidence of drop in lettuce plants. The soil moisture under subsurface drip irrigation was significantly lower at all depths and distances from the bed center after an irrigation event than under furrow irrigation. The soil temperature, in contrast, was significantly higher at both 5 and 15 cm depths under drip irrigation than under furrow irrigation. The suppression of lettuce drop under subsurface drip irrigation compared with furrow irrigation is attributed to differential moisture and temperature effects rather than to changes in the soil microflora or their inhibitory effects on S. minor.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Drip irrigation"

1

Call, Robert, and Cado Daily. "Drip Irrigation: The Basics." College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/144820.

Full text
Abstract:
2 pp.
Drip irrigation is the slow, measured application of waer through devices called emitters. Now a wide variety of quality products has been developed to make drip irrigation reliable and easy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Farr, C. R. "Salinity Distribution Under Drip Irrigation." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1985. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/204075.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Farr, C. R. "Planting Patterns Under Drip Irrigation." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1986. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/219749.

Full text
Abstract:
The 1985 and 1986 Cotton Reports have the same publication and P-Series numbers.
Planting pattern 2x1 skip row cotton outyielded variable row 32"x44" per gross field acre under drip irrigation with saline water. Skip row planting in deep water areas appears to be a feasible selection with high water cost, reduced tubing requirement, lowered land rentals and increased yield response.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Didan, Kamel 1965. "Expert system for drip irrigation design." Thesis, The University of Arizona, 1991. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/291460.

Full text
Abstract:
Drip irrigation design is a multi-step routine that has to be carried out in a step by step fashion with each step covering a part of the design process. An expert system has been developed with a set of external programs to accomplish the drip system design. The expertise used in the present expert system knowledge base was induced from engineering handbooks and articles as well as personal consultations. The expert system has been developed in such a way that a variety of cases can be handled. In addition, to simulate the human expert, a new drip irrigation design evaluation factor has been introduced (Design Success Indicator, DSI) in order to estimate the system response on field depending on the confidence of data being used. The results are very promising with respect to the expertise used. However many parts of the knowledge-base have to be fine-tuned in order to reach a highly performing expert system.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Thompson, Evan J. "Hydraulics of IDEal Drip Irrigation Systems." DigitalCommons@USU, 2009. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/296.

Full text
Abstract:
The hydraulics of IDEal drip irrigation system components were analyzed under controlled laboratory conditions and the results can be applied to the design of IDEal systems. The hydraulic loss coefficient for the lateral-submain connector valves was determined based on laboratory measurements. It was found that the hydraulic loss due to friction in the lay-flat laterals can be accurately estimated with standard friction loss equations using a smaller effective diameter based on the wall thickness and inlet pressure head. The equivalent length barb loss, expressed as an equivalent length of lateral, was calculated for button emitters, as well as for micro-tubes inserted to lengths of 5 and 10 cm. It was concluded that the barb loss is essentially constant over the micro-tube insertion range of 5-10 cm. The head-discharge relationship and coefficient of manufacturer's variation of pre-punched lateral holes (without emitters), button emitters, and micro-tubes were characterized. Finally, several IDEal drip irrigation systems in the Central Rift Valley of Ethiopia were evaluated in the field. Recommendations were given for future research and improvements in the manufacturing, installation, operation, and maintenance of IDEal drip irrigation equipment.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Rubeiz, I. G., N. F. Oebker, and J. L. Stroehlein. "Vegetable Crop Response to Subsurface Drip Irrigation." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1986. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/214134.

Full text
Abstract:
Drip irrigation lines placed 15 cm (deep) and 5 cm (shallow) below soil surface were compared to furrow irrigation with zucchini squash as a summer crop and cabbage as a winter crop. Both crops were grown on the same drip lines in each treatment. Urea phosphate was injected in drip lines during growing season while the furrow-irrigated plots received preplant application of phosphorus. In squash, deep lines produced higher yields than did shallow. Deep-drip yields were comparable to those with furrow but used half the water and half the fertilizer. In cabbage, deep-drip yielded slightly higher than shallow-drip and furrow. In these studies, deep-drip was superior in applying water and fertilizer.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Farr, C. R. "PIX Use Under Different Drip Irrigation Regimes." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1986. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/219710.

Full text
Abstract:
The 1985 and 1986 Cotton Reports have the same publication and P-Series numbers.
PIX application on June 24 to high flowering rate cotton suppressed growth to an average .3 inch per day compared to .85 inch for untreated cotton during the period from July 2 to July 15. Treatment of DPL 90 cotton with a flowering rate of 5 flowers per 25 feet of row held growth to .38 inch per day versus 25 flowers per 25 feet of row also increased small boll numbers by July 15, or 21 days after treatment, over untreated cotton. Treatment of cotton with flowering rate of 5 flowers per 25 feet of row increased small boll numbers by July 29 or 35 days after treatment.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Huang, Shen S. B. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "Evaluation of pre-packaged agricultural drip irrigation kits." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/74494.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (S.B.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, 2012.
Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 67-69).
The purpose of this thesis is to conduct user testing and performance evaluation of two different agricultural pre-packaged drip irrigation kit (PDIK) systems: Chapin Bucket Kit and International Design Enterprises (IDE) drip kit. PDIK systems are a cost-effective type of appropriate technology for the developing world because they reduce agricultural water consumption and can increase crop yield over other methods of irrigation. Overall user testing indicates preference for the IDE drip kit because of ease of installation, low cost, and suitable size for the average household plot. On the other hand, the Chapin Bucket Kit performs better in laboratory evaluation in terms of emitter performance, materials strength, and filter clogging . Ultimately, it is up to users to decide what are the trade-offs that can be made when choosing a PDIK system. This study is conducted under the MIT Development Lab Technology Evaluation and Verification Program (D-lab TEV) and has been financially supported by the MIT Public Service Center and the MIT Department of Foreign Languages and Literature.
by Shen Huang.
S.B.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Olson, Jeremy Ray. "Phosphorus fertilization of corn using subsurface drip irrigation." Thesis, Kansas State University, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/8703.

Full text
Abstract:
Master of Science
Department of Agronomy
Scott A. Staggenborg
In recent years, subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) acres have increased substantially. The use of SDI on corn (Zea Mays L.) in the Great Plains has increased due to increased land costs, reduced irrigation water availability, and higher commodity prices. Applying phosphorus (P) fertilizer through a SDI system becomes a major advantage, but further investigation of the interaction between water and fertilizer is needed. Sub-surface drip irrigation systems can be used to better improve the application efficiencies of fertilizers, applying in wet soil-root zones can lead to better uptake of soil applied materials. The objectives of this study were to determine how corn responds to P fertilizer applied via SDI and to create methodologies to simulate fertilizer and irrigation water compatibility tests for use in SDI systems. A plot sized SDI system was installed near Manhattan, KS to evaluate P treatments. Eight separate P fertilizers were applied via SDI mid-season at a rate of 34 kg P2O5 ha-1 and split-plots were created with 2x2 starter band at planting. Nitrogen was a non-limiting factor, with 180 kg N ha-1 applied as urea. Both starter fertilizer and injected fertilizer affected corn grain yield as indicated by the starter by treatment interaction. Split applying starter fertilizer at planting increased yield. A secondary laboratory study was conducted to evaluate the water and fertilizer interactions. A filtration system was used to simulate field conditions and each fertilizer/water mix was filtered through a 400 mesh filter paper to evaluate fertilizer precipitant formation. Sixteen common fertilizers were analyzed with different rates of Avail. Differences were observed between fertilizer treatments, visually and quantitatively. A secondary P soil movement field study was performed to quantify P concentrations around the SDI emitter. Soils were sampled in a 30.5 cm by 30.5 cm square adjacent to the emitter on a control treatment and a fertilized treatment, in both years of the study. Visual and quantitative differences were observed between the two treatments in both years of the study. When P fertilizers were added to the SDI system, higher P concentrations were found very close to the emitter orifice. Control treatments exhibited lower P concentrations around the emitter than fertilized treatments.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Farr, Charles. "The Use of Drip Irrigation in Maricopa County." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1988. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/204544.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Drip irrigation"

1

Dasberg, Samuel, and Dani Or. Drip Irrigation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03963-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Dasberg, S. Drip irrigation manual. Bet Dagan, Israel: International Irrigation Information Center, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Rajput, T. B. S. Drip irrigation manual. New Delhi: Water Technology Centre, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Shock, C. C. Drip irrigation: An introduction. [Corvallis, Or.]: Oregon State University, Extension Service, 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Ravikumar, V. Sprinkler and Drip Irrigation. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2775-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Goyal, Megh Raj. Bibliography--drip/trickle irrigation. San Juan, PR, USA: College of Engineers and Surveyors of Puerto Rico, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Books, Sunset, ed. Sprinklers & drip systems. Menlo Park, CA: Sunset Books, 2006.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

(India), International Development Enterprises. From desperation to drip irrigation. New Delhi: International Development Enterprises (India), 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

MacLean, Jayne T. Drip and trickle irrigation, 1984-85: 183 citations. Beltsville, Md: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, National Agricultural Library, 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Rao, B. V. Madhusudan. Study of micro irrigation in Karnataka: Drip and sprinkler irrigation : final report. Bangalore: Centre for Budget and Policy Studies, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Drip irrigation"

1

Dasberg, Samuel, and Dani Or. "Introduction." In Drip Irrigation, 1–14. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03963-2_1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Dasberg, Samuel, and Dani Or. "Drip System Components." In Drip Irrigation, 15–35. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03963-2_2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Dasberg, Samuel, and Dani Or. "Soil Water and Salt Regime." In Drip Irrigation, 36–69. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03963-2_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Dasberg, Samuel, and Dani Or. "Drip System Design." In Drip Irrigation, 70–99. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03963-2_4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Dasberg, Samuel, and Dani Or. "Monitoring and Management of Drip Systems." In Drip Irrigation, 100–124. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03963-2_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Dasberg, Samuel, and Dani Or. "Practical Applications of Drip Irrigation." In Drip Irrigation, 125–38. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03963-2_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Albaji, Mohammad. "Drip irrigation." In Introduction to Water Engineering, Hydrology, and Irrigation, 173–85. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003293507-12.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Ravikumar, V. "Drip Irrigation Components." In Sprinkler and Drip Irrigation, 151–213. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2775-1_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Waller, Peter, and Muluneh Yitayew. "Agricultural Drip Irrigation." In Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 289–304. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05699-9_17.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Ravikumar, V. "Drip Irrigation—Planning Factors." In Sprinkler and Drip Irrigation, 215–46. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2775-1_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Drip irrigation"

1

David A. Bainbridge. "Beyond Drip Irrigation - Hyper-efficient Irrigation." In 2006 Portland, Oregon, July 9-12, 2006. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.20692.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Blaine R Hanson and Don May. "Salinity Control with Drip Irrigation." In 2010 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, June 20 - June 23, 2010. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.29683.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Capra, A., and B. Scicolone. "Wastewater reuse by drip irrigation." In Environmental Health Risk 2001. Southampton, UK: WIT Press, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/ehr010151.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Jenkins, Zane S., and Monty J. Teeter. "Mobile Drip Irrigation Transforming Center Pivots Through Drip Technology." In 6th Decennial National Irrigation Symposium, 6-8, December 2021, San Diego, California. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/irrig.2020-106.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Oliver, M. M. H., G. A. Hewa, and D. Pezzaniti. "Subsurface drip irrigation with reclaimed water: issues we must think now." In SUSTAINABLE IRRIGATION 2012. Southampton, UK: WIT Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/si120171.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Edward C Martin and Duncan Mark Livingston. "Drip Irrigation on the Navajo Nation." In 5th National Decennial Irrigation Conference Proceedings, 5-8 December 2010, Phoenix Convention Center, Phoenix, Arizona USA. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.35887.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Blaine R Hanson and Don May. "Response of Onion to Drip Irrigation." In 2008 Providence, Rhode Island, June 29 - July 2, 2008. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.24867.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Freddie R Lamm. "Unique Challenges with Subsurface Drip Irrigation." In 2009 Reno, Nevada, June 21 - June 24, 2009. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/2013.27345.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Gyasi-Agyei, Y. "Hydraulic modelling of drip irrigation systems used for grass establishment on steep slopes." In SUSTAINABLE IRRIGATION 2006. Southampton, UK: WIT Press, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/si060161.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Hanson, B., and D. May. "Evapotranspiration, yield, crop coefficients, and water use efficiency of drip and furrow irrigated processing tomatoes." In SUSTAINABLE IRRIGATION 2006. Southampton, UK: WIT Press, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/si060041.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Drip irrigation"

1

Lawson, Vincent. Subsurface Drip Irrigation Project. Ames: Iowa State University, Digital Repository, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/farmprogressreports-180814-1087.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Shani, Uri, Arthur Warrick, David Russo, and Muluneh Yitayew. Subsurface Drip Irrigation under Spatially Variable Conditions. United States Department of Agriculture, June 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/1994.7604293.bard.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Wilde, E. W. D-Area Drip Irrigation-Phytoremediation Project: SRTC Final Report. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/807121.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Dasberg, Shmuel, Jan W. Hopmans, Larry J. Schwankl, and Dani Or. Drip Irrigation Management by TDR Monitoring of Soil Water and Solute Distribution. United States Department of Agriculture, August 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/1993.7568095.bard.

Full text
Abstract:
Drip irrigation has the potential of high water use efficiency, but actual water measurement is difficult because of the limited wetted volume. Two long-term experiments in orchards in Israel and in California and several field crop studies supported by this project have demonstrated the feasibility of precise monitoring of soil water distribution for drip irrigation in spite of the limited soil wetting. Time Domain Reflectometry (TDR) enables in situ measurement of soil water content of well defined small volumes. Several approaches were tried in monitoring the soil water balance in the field during drip irrigation. These also facilitated the estimation of water uptake: 1. The use of multilevel moisture probe TDR system. This approach proved to be of limited value because of the extremely small diameter of measurement. 2. The placement of 20 cm long TDR probes at predetermined distances from the drippers in citrus orchards. 3. Heavy instrumentation with neutron scattering access tubes and tensiometers of a single drip irrigated almond tree. 4. High resolution spatial and temporal measurements (0.1m x 0.1m grid) of water content by TDR in corn irrigated by surface and subsurface drip. The latter approach was accompanied by parametric modelling of water uptake intensity patterns by corn roots and superimposed with analytical solutions for water flow from point and line sources. All this lead to general and physically based suggestions for the placement of soil water sensors for scheduling drip irrigation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Wilde, E. W. D-Area Drip Irrigation/Phytoremediation Project: SRTC Report on Phase 1. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), September 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/786588.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Assaf, Raphael, Claude J. Phene, Israel Levin, and Ben-Ami Bravdo. Optimization of Water by Automated Drip Irrigation Control for Apple Trees. United States Department of Agriculture, January 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/1987.7568078.bard.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Assaf, Raphael, Claude Phene, Israel Levin, Beni Bar-Yosef, and Ben-Ami Bravdo. Optimization of Water and Nitrogen Application by Automated Drip Irrigation Control for Apple Trees. United States Department of Agriculture, February 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/1986.7594410.bard.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Tsur, Yacov, David Zilberman, Uri Shani, Amos Zemel, and David Sunding. Dynamic intraseasonal irrigation management under water scarcity, water quality, irrigation technology and environmental constraints. United States Department of Agriculture, March 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/2007.7696507.bard.

Full text
Abstract:
In this project we studied optimal use and adoption of sophisticated irrigation technologies. The stated objectives in the original proposal were to develop a conceptual framework for analyzing intra-season timing of water application rates with implications for crop and irrigation technology selection. We proposed to base the analysis on an intra-seasonal, dynamic, agro-economic model of plants' water demand, paying special attention to contamination of groundwater and soil in intensively cultivated areas that increasingly rely on water of lesser quality. The framework developed in the project integrates (i) a bio-physical model of water flow in the vadose zone and water uptake by plants and yield response with (ii) a dynamic management model to determine the optimal intra-season irrigation policy. It consists of a dynamic optimization model to determine irrigation rates at each point of time during the growing season and aggregation relating harvested yield with accumulated water input. The detailed dynamic approach provides a description of yield production processes at the plant’s level, and serves to determine intra-season irrigation decisions. Data derived from extensive field experiments were used to calibrate the model's parameters. We use the framework to establish the substitution between irrigation technology (capital) and water inputs; this is an important property of irrigation water productivity that has been overlooked in the literature. Another important feature investigated is the possibility to substitute fresh and saline water with a minimal productivity loss. The effects of soil properties and crop characteristics on optimal technology adoption have also been studied. We find that sandy soil, with low water holding capacity, is more conducive to adoption of sophisticated drip irrigation, as compared to heavier soils in which drainage losses are significantly smaller.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Wipfler, E. L., W. H. J. Beltman, J. J. T. I. Boesten, M. J. J. Hoogsteen, A. M. A. van der Linden, E. A. va Os, M. van der Staaij, and G. L. A. M. Swinkels. Testing of the Greenhouse Emission Model for application of plant protection products via drip irrigation in soilless cultivation. Wageningen: Wageningen Environmental Research, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18174/522831.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Oron, Gideon, Raphi Mandelbaum, Carlos E. Enriquez, Robert Armon, Yoseph Manor, L. Gillerman, A. Alum, and Charles P. Gerba. Optimization of Secondary Wastewater Reuse to Minimize Environmental Risks. United States Department of Agriculture, December 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/1999.7573077.bard.

Full text
Abstract:
The main purpose of the research was to examine approaches and to evaluate methods for minimizing the risks during applying treated domestic wastewater for agricultural irrigation. This general purpose consisted of examining under field conditions the possibilities when implementing different application technologies for minimizing health and environmental risks. It was assumed that Subsurface Drip Irrigation (SDI) will provide adequate conditions for safe effluent reuse. Controlled field experiments where conducted in commercial fields to evaluate the alternatives. Main efforts where conducted in Israel in the grape vineyard in Arad heights, in the field crops in Kibbutz Chafets Chaim and in Arizona in fields adjacent to the University campus. The complementary part was to examine the behavior of the various pathogens in the effluent-soil-plant system. The analysis is based on controlled experiments, primarily in greenhouse along with field experiments. Molecular biology methods were used to identify the behavior of the pathogens in the components of the system. The project included as well examining the effluent quality in various sites, primarily those in which treated wastewater is reused for agricultural irrigation. The monitoring included conventional parameters however, also parasites such as Giardia and Cryptosporidium. The results obtained indicate the prominent advantages of using Subsurface Drip Irrigation (SDI) method for minimizing health and environmental risks during application of secondary effluent. A theoretical model for assessing the risks while applying treated wastewater was completed as well. The management model shows the risks during various scenarios of wastewater quality, application technology and related human exposure.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Drip irrigation' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography