Academic literature on the topic 'Domain'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Domain.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Domain"
Sirait, Timoteus Natanael, and Jimmy BP Simangungsong. "ANALISIS YURIDIS PELAKSANAAN TUGAS POKOK PENGELOLA DOMAIN INTERNET INDONESIA." NOMMENSEN JOURNAL OF LEGAL OPINION 1, no. 01 (June 30, 2020): 52–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.51622/njlo.v1i01.38.
Full textSampathirao Suneetha, Et al. "Cross-Domain Aspect Extraction using Adversarial Domain Adaptation." International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication 11, no. 11s (October 31, 2023): 672–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.17762/ijritcc.v11i11s.9658.
Full textXu, Minghao, Jian Zhang, Bingbing Ni, Teng Li, Chengjie Wang, Qi Tian, and Wenjun Zhang. "Adversarial Domain Adaptation with Domain Mixup." Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 34, no. 04 (April 3, 2020): 6502–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v34i04.6123.
Full textBhaskara, Ramachandra M., Alexandre G. de Brevern, and Narayanaswamy Srinivasan. "Understanding the role of domain–domain linkers in the spatial orientation of domains in multi-domain proteins." Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics 31, no. 12 (December 2013): 1467–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2012.743438.
Full textCao, Meng, and Songcan Chen. "Mixup-Induced Domain Extrapolation for Domain Generalization." Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 38, no. 10 (March 24, 2024): 11168–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v38i10.28994.
Full textZhou, Hongyi, Bin Xue, and Yaoqi Zhou. "DDOMAIN: Dividing structures into domains using a normalized domain-domain interaction profile." Protein Science 16, no. 5 (May 2007): 947–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1110/ps.062597307.
Full textHu, Chengyang, Ke-Yue Zhang, Taiping Yao, Shice Liu, Shouhong Ding, Xin Tan, and Lizhuang Ma. "Domain-Hallucinated Updating for Multi-Domain Face Anti-spoofing." Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 38, no. 3 (March 24, 2024): 2193–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v38i3.27992.
Full textLópez-Huertas, María J. "Domain Analysis for Interdisciplinary Knowledge Domains." KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION 42, no. 8 (2015): 570–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2015-8-570.
Full textAnderson, D. D., J. Coykendall, L. Hill, and M. Zafrullah. "Monoid Domain Constructions of Antimatter Domains." Communications in Algebra 35, no. 10 (September 21, 2007): 3236–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00914030701410294.
Full textMatzen, Sylvia, and Stéphane Fusil. "Domains and domain walls in multiferroics." Comptes Rendus Physique 16, no. 2 (March 2015): 227–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2015.01.013.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Domain"
Hamrin, Göran. "Effective Domains and Admissible Domain Representations." Doctoral thesis, Uppsala University, Department of Mathematics, 2005. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-5883.
Full textThis thesis consists of four papers in domain theory and a summary. The first two papers deal with the problem of defining effectivity for continuous cpos. The third and fourth paper present the new notion of an admissible domain representation, where a domain representation D of a space X is λ-admissible if, in principle, all other λ-based domain representations E of X can be reduced to X via a continuous function from E to D.
In Paper I we define a cartesian closed category of effective bifinite domains. We also investigate the method of inducing effectivity onto continuous cpos via projection pairs, resulting in a cartesian closed category of projections of effective bifinite domains.
In Paper II we introduce the notion of an almost algebraic basis for a continuous cpo, showing that there is a natural cartesian closed category of effective consistently complete continuous cpos with almost algebraic bases. We also generalise the notion of a complete set, used in Paper I to define the bifinite domains, and investigate what closure results that can be obtained.
In Paper III we consider admissible domain representations of topological spaces. We present a characterisation theorem of exactly when a topological space has a λ-admissible and κ-based domain representation. We also show that there is a natural cartesian closed category of countably based and countably admissible domain representations.
In Paper IV we consider admissible domain representations of convergence spaces, where a convergence space is a set X together with a convergence relation between nets on X and elements of X. We study in particular the new notion of weak κ-convergence spaces, which roughly means that the convergence relation satisfies a generalisation of the Kuratowski limit space axioms to cardinality κ. We show that the category of weak κ-convergence spaces is cartesian closed. We also show that the category of weak κ-convergence spaces that have a dense, λ-admissible, κ-continuous and α-based consistently complete domain representation is cartesian closed when α ≤ λ ≥ κ. As natural corollaries we obtain corresponding results for the associated category of weak convergence spaces.
Hamrin, Göran. "Effective domains and admissible domain representations /." Uppsala : Department of Mathematics, Uppsala University [distributör], 2005. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-5883.
Full textKucheruk, Liliya. "Modern English Legal Terminology : linguistic and cognitive aspects." Thesis, Bordeaux 3, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013BOR30016/document.
Full textThe present doctoral dissertation entitled “Modern English Legal Terminology: linguistic and cognitive aspects” investigates the contemporary legal idiom, from a cognitive linguistics perspective. The aim of this study is to map out the peculiarities of English legal terminology and develop principles of systematization, within the framework of conceptual metaphor theory. This means 1) determining the basic concepts used metaphorically in English legal language, and 2) establishing the main cross-domain mappings and correlations between separate items within concrete domains.The Corpus of Legal English (COLE) was set up and a quantitative analysis performed, in which metaphorical expressions related to legal terminology were searched for and classified on the basis of meanings, conceptual domains and mappings. Thus, the conceptual metaphors of WAR, MEDICINE, SPORT and CONSTRUCTION were found to be the most numerous and valuable in Legal English. The main cross-domain mappings between these source domains and the target domain of LAW were established.In order to carry out this data-driven study, 156 legal texts were selected and compiled into the Corpus of Legal English (COLE). The source-texts represent various thematic categories. The COLE was systematically used to interpret frequency counts from the point of view of conceptual metaphor theory
Дисертаційне дослідження на тему «Сучасна англійська юридична термінологія: лінгвокогнитивний аспект» досліджує сучасну мову права з точки зору когнітивної лінгвістики. Головною метою дослідження було дослідження особливостей англійської юридичної термінології та принципів її систематизації з точки зору когнітивної теорії і власне теорії концептуальної метафори. В ході написання роботи були поставлені наступні цілі: 1) визначити головні концепти які використовуються у якості метафор в англійській мові права; 2) встановити головні концептуальні зв’язки між окремими елементами доменів.З метою вирішення цих питань і задач був проведений кількісний аналіз корпусу юридичної англійської мови. В ході цього аналізу біли виділені та класифіковані метафоричні вирази які пов’язані з юридичною термінологією згідно їх метафоричного значення. В результаті аналізу було виявлено що концептуальні метафори WAR, MEDICINE, SPORT та CONSTRUCTION займають домінуюче положення в мові права. Також були встановлені основні концептуальні зв’язки між сферою-джерелом та сферою-ціллю.В даному дослідженні було використано спеціально створений корпус, який включає в себе 156 правових текстів різноманітної сюжетної направленості, для проведення кількісного аналізу з точки зору концептуальної метафори
Comitz, Paul H. "A Domain-Specific Language for Aviation Domain Interoperability." NSUWorks, 2013. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/gscis_etd/122.
Full textSankaran, Krishnaswamy. "Accurate domain truncation techniques for time-domain conformal methods /." Zürich : ETH, 2007. http://e-collection.ethbib.ethz.ch/show?type=diss&nr=17447.
Full textDing, Ziwei. "Domain functions and domain interactions of CTP, phosphocholine cytidylyltransferase." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1999. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk1/tape7/PQDD_0023/MQ51332.pdf.
Full textEl, Boukkouri Hicham. "Domain adaptation of word embeddings through the exploitation of in-domain corpora and knowledge bases." Electronic Thesis or Diss., université Paris-Saclay, 2021. http://www.theses.fr/2021UPASG086.
Full textThere are, at the basis of most NLP systems, numerical representations that enable the machine to process, interact with and—to some extent—understand human language. These “word embeddings” come in different flavours but can be generally categorised into two distinct groups: on one hand, static embeddings that learn and assign a single definitive representation to each word; and on the other, contextual embeddings that instead learn to generate word representations on the fly, according to a current context. In both cases, training these models requires a large amount of texts. This often leads NLP practitioners to compile and merge texts from multiple sources, often mixing different styles and domains (e.g. encyclopaedias, news articles, scientific articles, etc.) in order to produce corpora that are sufficiently large for training good representations. These so-called “general domain” corpora are today the basis on which most word embeddings are trained, greatly limiting their use in more specific areas. In fact, “specialized domains” like the medical domain usually manifest enough lexical, semantic and stylistic idiosyncrasies (e.g. use of acronyms and technical terms) that general-purpose word embeddings are unable to effectively encode out-of-the-box. In this thesis, we explore how different kinds of resources may be leveraged to train domain-specific representations or further specialise preexisting ones. Specifically, we first investigate how in-domain corpora can be used for this purpose. In particular, we show that both corpus size and domain similarity play an important role in this process and propose a way to leverage a small corpus from the target domain to achieve improved results in low-resource settings. Then, we address the case of BERT-like models and observe that the general-domain vocabularies of these models may not be suited for specialized domains. However, we show evidence that models trained using such vocabularies can be on par with fully specialized systems using in-domain vocabularies—which leads us to accept re-training general domain models as an effective approach for constructing domain-specific systems. We also propose CharacterBERT, a variant of BERT that is able to produce word-level open-vocabulary representations by consulting a word's characters. We show evidence that this architecture leads to improved performance in the medical domain while being more robust to misspellings. Finally, we investigate how external resources in the form of knowledge bases may be leveraged to specialise existing representations. In this context, we propose a simple approach that consists in constructing dense representations of these knowledge bases then combining these knowledge vectors with the target word embeddings. We generalise this approach and propose Knowledge Injection Modules, small neural layers that incorporate external representations into the hidden states of a Transformer-based model. Overall, we show that these approaches can lead to improved results, however, we intuit that this final performance ultimately depends on whether the knowledge that is relevant to the target task is available in the input resource. All in all, our work shows evidence that both in-domain corpora and knowledge may be used to construct better word embeddings for specialized domains. In order to facilitate future research on similar topics, we open-source our code and share pre-trained models whenever appropriate
Hitchins, Matthew G. "Domain Disparity| Informing the Debate between Domain-General and Domain-Specific Information Processing in Working Memory." Thesis, The George Washington University, 2017. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10607221.
Full textWorking memory is a collection of cognitive resources that allow for the temporary maintenance and manipulation of information. This information can then be used to accomplish task goals in a variety of different contexts. To do this, the working memory system is able to process many different kinds of information using resources dedicated to the processing of those specific types of information. This processing is modulated by a control component which is responsible for guiding actions in the face of interference. Recently, the way in which working memory handles the processing of this information has been the subject of debate. Specifically, current models of working memory differ in their conceptualization of its functional architecture and the interaction between domain-specific storage structures and domain-general control processes. Here, domain-specific processing is when certain components of a model are dedicated to processing certain kinds of information, be it spatial or verbal. Domain-general processing is a when a component of a model can process multiple kinds of information. One approach conceptualizes working memory as consisting of various discrete components that are dedicated to processing specific kinds of information. These multiple component models attempt to explain how domain-specific storage structures are coordinated by a domain-general control mechanism. They also predict that capacity variations in those domain-specific storage structures can directly affect the performance of the domain-general control mechanism. Another approach focuses primarily on the contributions of a domain-general control mechanism to behavior. These controlled attention approaches collapse working memory and attention and propose that a domain-general control mechanism is the primary source of individual differences. This means that variations in domain-specific storage structures are not predicted to affect the functioning of the domain-general control mechanism. This dissertation will make the argument that conceptualizing working memory as either domain-specific or domain-general creates a false dichotomy. To do this, different ways of measuring working memory capacity will first be discussed. That discussion will serve as a basis for understanding the differences, and similarities between both models. A more detailed exposition of both the multiple component model and controlled attention account will follow. Behavioral and physiological evidence will accompany the descriptions of both models. The emphasis of the evidence presented here will be on load effects: observed changes in task performance when information is maintained in working memory. Load effects can be specific to the type of information being maintained (domain-specific), or occur regardless of information type (domain-general). This dissertation will demonstrate how the two models fail to address evidence for both domain-specific and domain-general load effects. Given these inadequacies, a new set of experiments will be proposed that will seek to demonstrate both domain-specific and domain-general effects within the same paradigm. Being able to demonstrate both these effects will go some way towards accounting for the differing evidence presented in the literature. A brief conceptualization of a possible account to explain these effects will then be discussed. Finally, future directions for research will be described.
Scheuffgen, Kristina. "Domain-general and domain-specific deficits in autism and dyslexia." Thesis, University College London (University of London), 1998. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.298126.
Full textGale, Andrew J. (Andrew John). "Protein-RNA domain-domain interactions in a tRNA sythetase system." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1995. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/39369.
Full textBooks on the topic "Domain"
McBryde, Ian. Domain. [Wollongong, N.S.W.]: Five Islands Press, 2004.
Find full textHerbert, James. Domain. London: Book Club Associates, 1985.
Find full textHerbert, James. Domain. New York: New American Library, 1985.
Find full textKangueane, Pandjassarame, and Christina Nilofer. Protein-Protein and Domain-Domain Interactions. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7347-2.
Full textKim, Iljoong, Hojun Lee, and Ilya Somin, eds. Eminent Domain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781316822685.
Full textReinhartz-Berger, Iris, Arnon Sturm, Tony Clark, Sholom Cohen, and Jorn Bettin, eds. Domain Engineering. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36654-3.
Full textBooks, Ace, and Copyright Paperback Collection (Library of Congress), eds. Dragon's domain. New York: Ace Books, 1993.
Find full textAndrade, Eugenio de. Dark domain. Toronto: Guernica, 2000.
Find full texttranslator, Shipley Krista, and Sacramento Ludwig, eds. Species domain. Los Angeles, CA: Seven Seas Entertainment, LLC, 2017.
Find full textMatthews, Alex. Death's domain. Toronto: Worldwide, 2005.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Domain"
Kangueane, Pandjassarame, and Christina Nilofer. "Domain-Domain Interactions." In Protein-Protein and Domain-Domain Interactions, 143–46. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7347-2_12.
Full textGooch, Jan W. "Domain." In Encyclopedic Dictionary of Polymers, 239. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6247-8_3927.
Full textGooch, Jan W. "Domain." In Encyclopedic Dictionary of Polymers, 888. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6247-8_13593.
Full textWeik, Martin H. "domain." In Computer Science and Communications Dictionary, 453. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-0613-6_5500.
Full textHubaux, Arnaud, Mathieu Acher, Thein Than Tun, Patrick Heymans, Philippe Collet, and Philippe Lahire. "Separating Concerns in Feature Models: Retrospective and Support for Multi-Views." In Domain Engineering, 3–28. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36654-3_1.
Full textKoshima, Amanuel Alemayehu, Vincent Englebert, and Philippe Thiran. "A Reconciliation Framework to Support Cooperative Work with DSM." In Domain Engineering, 239–59. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36654-3_10.
Full textBettin, Jorn. "Model Oriented Domain Analysis and Engineering." In Domain Engineering, 263–90. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36654-3_11.
Full textHenderson-Sellers, Brian, and Cesar Gonzalez-Perez. "Multi-Level Meta-Modelling to Underpin the Abstract and Concrete Syntax for Domain-Specific Modelling Languages." In Domain Engineering, 291–316. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36654-3_12.
Full textGuizzardi, Giancarlo. "Ontology-Based Evaluation and Design of Visual Conceptual Modeling Languages." In Domain Engineering, 317–47. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36654-3_13.
Full textPastor, Oscar, Giovanni Giachetti, Beatriz Marín, and Francisco Valverde. "Automating the Interoperability of Conceptual Models in Specific Development Domains." In Domain Engineering, 349–73. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36654-3_14.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Domain"
Ćiprijanović, Aleksandra, Diana Kafkes, Sydney Jenkins, K. Downey, Gabriel Perdue, S. Madireddy, T. Johnston, and Brian Nord. "Domain Adaptation for Cross-Domain Studies of Merging Galaxies." In Domain Adaptation for Cross-Domain Studies of Merging Galaxies. US DOE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1825309.
Full textĆiprijanović, Aleksandra. "Domain Adaptation for Cross-Domain Studies in Astronomy: Merging Galaxies Identification." In Domain Adaptation for Cross-Domain Studies in Astronomy: Merging Galaxies Identification. US DOE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1827857.
Full textSun, Zhishu, Zhifeng Shen, Luojun Lin, Yuanlong Yu, Zhifeng Yang, Shicai Yang, and Weijie Chen. "Dynamic Domain Generalization." In Thirty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-22}. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2022/187.
Full textLiu, Yingnan, Yingtian Zou, Rui Qiao, Fusheng Liu, Mong Li Lee, and Wynne Hsu. "Cross-Domain Feature Augmentation for Domain Generalization." In Thirty-Third International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-24}. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2024/127.
Full textChen, Xiang, Lei Li, Shuofei Qiao, Ningyu Zhang, Chuanqi Tan, Yong Jiang, Fei Huang, and Huajun Chen. "One Model for All Domains: Collaborative Domain-Prefix Tuning for Cross-Domain NER." In Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-23}. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2023/559.
Full textCai, Yitao, and Xiaojun Wan. "Multi-Domain Sentiment Classification Based on Domain-Aware Embedding and Attention." In Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-19}. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2019/681.
Full textMancini, Massimiliano, Lorenzo Porzi, Samuel Rota Bulo, Barbara Caputo, and Elisa Ricci. "Boosting Domain Adaptation by Discovering Latent Domains." In 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). IEEE, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.2018.00397.
Full textUtzmann, Jens, and Claus-Dieter Munz. "Domain Decompositions for CAA in Complex Domains." In 13th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (28th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference). Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-3488.
Full textAyub, Md Ahsan, Steven Smith, Ambareen Siraj, and Paul Tinker. "Domain Generating Algorithm based Malicious Domains Detection." In 2021 8th IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing (CSCloud)/2021 7th IEEE International Conference on Edge Computing and Scalable Cloud (EdgeCom). IEEE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/cscloud-edgecom52276.2021.00024.
Full textZhe, Yu, Kazuto Fukuchi, Youhei Akimoto, and Jun Sakuma. "Domain Generalization Via Adversarially Learned Novel Domains." In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME). IEEE, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icme52920.2022.9860025.
Full textReports on the topic "Domain"
Wodicka, N., H. M. Steenkamp, T. Peterson, I. Therriault, J. B. Whalen, V. Tschirhart, C. J. M. Lawley, et al. An overview of Archean and Proterozoic history of the Tehery Lake-Wager Bay area, central Rae Craton, Nunavut. Natural Resources Canada/CMSS/Information Management, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4095/332501.
Full textKlenk, Matthew, and Ken Forbus. Cross Domain Analogies for Learning Domain Theories. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, January 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada471251.
Full textLutz, Carsten. Interval-based Temporal Reasoning with General TBoxes. Aachen University of Technology, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.25368/2022.109.
Full textChriston, Mark Allen. The Rendezvous Algorithm for Domain-to-Domain Data Transfers. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), February 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1169154.
Full textStahl, M. K. Domain administrators guide. RFC Editor, November 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/rfc1032.
Full textCooper, A., and J. Postel. The US Domain. RFC Editor, December 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/rfc1386.
Full textCooper, A., and J. Postel. The US Domain. RFC Editor, June 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/rfc1480.
Full textCross, L. E. Ferroelectric Domain Studies. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, December 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada413114.
Full textBlack, Alan W., and Kevin A. Lenzo. Limited Domain Synthesis. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, January 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada461150.
Full textFriedlander, Benjamin, and J. O. Smith. Time Domain Algorithms. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, September 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada163054.
Full text