Academic literature on the topic 'DNA double-strand breaks, Sae2'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'DNA double-strand breaks, Sae2.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "DNA double-strand breaks, Sae2"
Yu, Tai-Yuan, Michael T. Kimble, and Lorraine S. Symington. "Sae2 antagonizes Rad9 accumulation at DNA double-strand breaks to attenuate checkpoint signaling and facilitate end resection." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, no. 51 (December 3, 2018): E11961—E11969. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1816539115.
Full textFu, Qiong, Julia Chow, Kara A. Bernstein, Nodar Makharashvili, Sucheta Arora, Chia-Fang Lee, Maria D. Person, Rodney Rothstein, and Tanya T. Paull. "Phosphorylation-Regulated Transitions in an Oligomeric State Control the Activity of the Sae2 DNA Repair Enzyme." Molecular and Cellular Biology 34, no. 5 (December 16, 2013): 778–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.00963-13.
Full textYu, Tai-Yuan, Valerie E. Garcia, and Lorraine S. Symington. "CDK and Mec1/Tel1-catalyzed phosphorylation of Sae2 regulate different responses to DNA damage." Nucleic Acids Research 47, no. 21 (September 25, 2019): 11238–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz814.
Full textCannavo, Elda, Giordano Reginato, and Petr Cejka. "Stepwise 5′ DNA end-specific resection of DNA breaks by the Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 and Sae2 nuclease ensemble." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, no. 12 (February 28, 2019): 5505–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1820157116.
Full textChen, Huan, Roberto A. Donnianni, Naofumi Handa, Sarah K. Deng, Julyun Oh, Leonid A. Timashev, Stephen C. Kowalczykowski, and Lorraine S. Symington. "Sae2 promotes DNA damage resistance by removing the Mre11–Rad50–Xrs2 complex from DNA and attenuating Rad53 signaling." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112, no. 15 (March 23, 2015): E1880—E1887. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503331112.
Full textNicolette, Matthew L., Kihoon Lee, Zhi Guo, Mridula Rani, Julia M. Chow, Sang Eun Lee, and Tanya T. Paull. "Mre11–Rad50–Xrs2 and Sae2 promote 5′ strand resection of DNA double-strand breaks." Nature Structural & Molecular Biology 17, no. 12 (November 21, 2010): 1478–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nsmb.1957.
Full textRattray, Alison J., Carolyn B. McGill, Brenda K. Shafer, and Jeffrey N. Strathern. "Fidelity of Mitotic Double-Strand-Break Repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: A Role for SAE2/COM1." Genetics 158, no. 1 (May 1, 2001): 109–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/genetics/158.1.109.
Full textAkamatsu, Yufuko, Yasuto Murayama, Takatomi Yamada, Tomofumi Nakazaki, Yasuhiro Tsutsui, Kunihiro Ohta, and Hiroshi Iwasaki. "Molecular Characterization of the Role of the Schizosaccharomyces pombe nip1+/ctp1+ Gene in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair in Association with the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 Complex." Molecular and Cellular Biology 28, no. 11 (March 31, 2008): 3639–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/mcb.01828-07.
Full textMimitou, Eleni P., and Lorraine S. Symington. "Sae2, Exo1 and Sgs1 collaborate in DNA double-strand break processing." Nature 455, no. 7214 (September 21, 2008): 770–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07312.
Full textMarsella, Antonio, Elisa Gobbini, Corinne Cassani, Renata Tisi, Elda Cannavo, Giordano Reginato, Petr Cejka, and Maria Pia Longhese. "Sae2 and Rif2 regulate MRX endonuclease activity at DNA double-strand breaks in opposite manners." Cell Reports 34, no. 13 (March 2021): 108906. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108906.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "DNA double-strand breaks, Sae2"
GOBBINI, ELISA. "A screen for synthetic phenotypes reveals new Sae2 functions and interactions in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10281/102381.
Full textWardrope, Laura. "Repair of double-strand DNA breaks in Escherichia coli." Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/13208.
Full textLiu, Nan. "Hypersensitivity of ataxia telangiectasia cells to DNA double strand breaks." Thesis, University of St Andrews, 1994. http://hdl.handle.net/10023/13905.
Full textKrietsch, Jana. "PARP-1 activation regulates the DNA damage response to DNA double-strand breaks." Thesis, Université Laval, 2014. http://www.theses.ulaval.ca/2014/30722/30722.pdf.
Full textDNA double-strand breaks are potentially lethal lesions, which if not repaired correctly, can have harmful consequences such as carcinogenesis promoted by chromosome deletions and rearrangements. Poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation carried out by poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1) is one of the first posttranslational modifications occurring in response to DNA damage. In brief, PARP-1 uses nicotinamide to generate a negatively charged polymer called poly(ADP-ribose) polymer (PAR), that can be attached to acceptor proteins, which is to a large extent PARP-1 itself. PAR has recently been recognized as a recruitment signal for key DNA repair proteins to sites of DNA damage but the precise role of PARP-1 and its catalytic product PAR in the DNA damage response are still a matter of ongoing debate. Throughout my doctoral work, we confirmed that the proteins in complex with PAR promptly after DNA damage are mostly DNA repair proteins, whereas during the period of recovery from DNA damage, the PAR interactome is highly enriched with RNA processing factors. Interestingly, one of the most abundant RNA-binding proteins detected in the PAR interactome, namely NONO, did not follow these kinetics as it was highly enriched immediately after DNA damage in the DNA repair protein complexes centered on PAR. Our subsequent investigation of NONO in the DNA damage response to double-strand breaks strikingly revealed a direct implication for NONO in repair by nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). Moreover, we found that NONO strongly and specifically binds to PAR through its RNA-recognition motif 1 (RRM1), highlighting competition between PAR and RNA for the same binding site. Remarkably, the in vivo recruitment of NONO to DNA damage sites completely depends on PAR and requires the RRM1 motif. In conclusion, our results establish NONO as a new protein implicated in the DNA damage response to double-strand break and in broader terms add another layer of complexity to the cross-talk between RNA-biology and DNA repair.
Ma, Yue. "Double-strand breaks (DSBs) and structure transition on genome-sized DNA." Thesis, https://doors.doshisha.ac.jp/opac/opac_link/bibid/BB13097333/?lang=0, 2018. https://doors.doshisha.ac.jp/opac/opac_link/bibid/BB13097333/?lang=0.
Full textThe protective effect of ascorbic acid (AA) and DMSO against double-strand breaks (DSBs) in DNA was evaluated by single-molecule observation of giant DNA (T4 DNA; 166kbp) through fluorescence microscopy. Samples were exposed to three different forms of radiation: visible light, γ-ray, and ultrasound or freeze/thawing. The change of the higher-order structure of genomic DNA molecules in the presence of alcohols by use of single DNA observation with fluorescence microscopy, by focusing our attention to unveil the different effect between 1-propanol and 2-propanol.
博士(工学)
Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering
同志社大学
Doshisha University
Khalil, Ashraf. "ATM-Dependent ERK Signaling in Response to DNA Double Strand Breaks." VCU Scholars Compass, 2006. http://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/etd/760.
Full textMARSELLA, ANTONIO. "Functions and regulation of the MRX complex at DNA double strand breaks." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/10281/310478.
Full textDNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most severe DNA lesions. If not properly repaired, DSBs could lead to loss of genetic information and genome instability, which is one of the hallmarks of cancer cells. Eukaryotic cells repair DSBs by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), which directly re-ligates the DNA broken ends, and homologous recombination (HR), which uses the intact homologous DNA sequence as a template to repair the DSB. HR requires a nucleolytic degradation of the broken DNA ends, in a process called resection. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the MRX (Mre11, Rad50 and Xrs2) complex, aided by Sae2, initiates resection of the DSB ends by performing an endonucleolytic cleavage on the 5’-ended strands. This cleavage, catalyzed by the Mre11 subunit, allows the access of Exo1 and Dna2 nucleases that elongate the ssDNA ends. In NHEJ, the two broken ends need to be physically connected to allow their correct religation. This function, called end tethering, depends on the Rad50 subunit, which binds and hydrolyses ATP. A transitions between an ATP-bound state to a post-hydrolysis cutting state regulates MRX DNA binding and processing activities. The MRX complex is also essential in DNA damage checkpoint activation because it recruits the checkpoint kinase Tel1 at the break site. In this thesis, we studied functions and regulation of the MRX complex in DSB repair. We found mre11 alleles that suppress the hypersensitivity of sae2Δ cells to genotoxic agents. The mutations in the Mre11 N-terminus suppress the resection defect of sae2Δ cells by lowering MRX and Tel1 association to DSBs. The diminished Tel1 persistence potentiates Dna2 resection activity by decreasing Rad9 association to DSBs. By contrast, the mre11 mutations localized at the C-terminus bypass Sae2 function in end-tethering but not in DSB resection, possibly by destabilizing the Mre11–Rad50 open conformation. These findings unmask the existence of structurally distinct Mre11 domains that support resistance to genotoxic agents by mediating different processes. In vitro Tel1 activation by MRX requires ATP binding to Rad50, suggesting a role for the MR subcomplex in Tel1 activation. In this thesis, we describe two separation-of-functions alleles, mre11-S499P and rad50-A78T, which we show to specifically affect Tel1 activation without impairing MRX functions in DSB repair. Both Mre11-S499P and Rad50-A78T reduce Tel1–MRX interaction leading to low Tel1 association at DSBs that reduces Tel1 activation. Molecular dynamics simulations show that the wild type MR subcomplex bound to ATP lingers in a tightly ‘closed’ conformation, while ADP presence leads to the destabilization of Rad50 dimer and of Mre11–Rad50 association, both events being required for MR conformational transition to an open state. By contrast, MRA78T undertakes complex opening even if Rad50 is bound to ATP, indicating that defective Tel1 activation caused by MRA78T results from destabilization of the ATP- bound conformational state. The lack of Sae2 increases MRX persistence at DSBs and checkpoint activation. In this thesis, we also show that the telomeric protein Rif2, which stimulates ATP hydrolysis by Rad50, inhibits the Mre11 endonuclease activity and is responsible for the increased MRX retention at DSBs in sae2Δ cells. We identified a Rad50 residue that is important for Rad50-Rif2 interaction and Rif2-mediated inhibition of Mre11 nuclease. This residue is located nearby a Rad50 surface that binds Sae2 and is important to stabilize the Mre11-Rad50 interaction in the cutting state. We propose that Sae2 stimulates MRX endonuclease activity by stabilizing the cutting state, whereas Rif2 inhibits it by antagonizing Sae2 binding to Rad50 and stabilizing a MR conformation that is not competent for DNA cleavage. The results described in this PhD thesis contribute to the understanding of the molecular mechanisms supporting functions and regulation of the MRX complex at DSBs.
Tentner, Andrea R. (Andrea Ruth). "Quantitative measurement and modeling of the DNA damage signaling network : DNA double-strand breaks." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/61234.
Full text"September 2009." Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 218-229).
DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) are one of the major mediators of chemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity in tumors. Cells that experience DNA damage can initiate a DNA damage-mediated cell-cycle arrest, attempt to repair the damage and, if successful, resume the cell-cycle (arrest/repair/resume). Cells can also initiate an active cell-death program known as apoptosis. However, it is not known what "formula" a cell uses to integrate protein signaling molecule activities to determine which of these paths it will take, or what protein signaling-molecules are essential to the execution of that decision. A better understanding of how these cellular decisions are made and mediated on a molecular level is essential to the improvement of existing combination and targeted chemotherapies, and to the development of novel targeted and personalized therapies. Our goal has been to gain an understanding of how cells responding to DSB integrate protein signaling-molecule activities across distinct signaling networks to make and execute binary cell-fate decisions, under conditions relevant to tumor physiology and treatment. We created a quantitative signal-response dataset, measuring signals that widely sample the response of signaling networks activated by the induction of DSB, and the associated cellular phenotypic responses, that together reflect the dynamic cellular responses that follow the induction of DSB. We made use of mathematical modeling approaches to systematically discover signal-response relationships within the DSB-responsive protein signaling network. The structure and content of the signal-response dataset is described, and the use of mathematical modeling approaches to analyze the dataset and discover specific signal-response relationships is illustrated. As a specific example, we selected a particularly strong set of identified signal-response correlations between ERK1/2 activity and S phase cell-cycle phenotype, identified in the mathematical data analysis, to posit a causal relationship between ERK1/2 and S phase cell cycle phenotype. We translated this posited causal relationship into an experimental hypothesis and experimentally test this hypothesis. We describe the validation of an experimental hypothesis based upon model-derived signal response relationships, and demonstrate a dual role for ERK1/2 in mediating cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis following DNA damage. Directions for the extension of the signal-response dataset and mathematical modeling approaches are outlined.
by Andrea R. Tentner.
Ph.D.
VILLA, MATTEO. "Regulation of DNA-end resection at DNA double strand breaks and stalled replication forks." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10281/198950.
Full textGenome instability is an hallmark of cancer cells and can be due to DNA damage or replication stress. DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are the most dangerous type of damage that cells have to manage. In response to DSBs, cells activate an highly conserved mechanism known as DNA damage checkpoint (DDC), whose primary effect is to halt the cell cycle until the damage is repaired. DDC is activated by the apical kinases Tel1/ATM and Mec1/ATR, which phosphorylate and activate the effector kinases Rad53/CHK2 and Chk1/CHK1. The Homologous Recombination (HR)-mediated repair of a DSB starts with the nucleolytic degradation (resection) of the 5’ ends to create long ssDNA tails. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, resection starts with an endonucleolytic cleavage catalyzed by the MRX complex together with Sae2. More extensive resection relies on two parallel pathways that involve the nucleases Exo1 and Dna2, together with the helicase Sgs1. Resection must be tightly controlled to avoid excessive ssDNA creation. The Ku complex and the checkpoint protein Rad9 negatively regulate resection. While Ku inhibits Exo1, Rad9 restrains nucleolytic degradation by an unknown mechanism. The absence of Sae2 impairs DSB resection and causes prolonged MRX binding at DSB that leads to persistent Tel1 and Rad53-dependent DNA damage checkpoint. SAE2 deleted strains are sensitive to DSBs inducing agents, like camptothecin (CPT). This sensitivity has been associated to the resection defect of sae2∆ cells, but what causes this resection defect and if the enhanced checkpoint signaling contributes to the DNA damage sensitivity of sae2∆ cells is unknown. For these reasons, we tried to identify other possible mechanisms regulating MRX/Sae2 requirement in DSB resection by searching extragenic mutations that suppressed the sensitivity to DNA damaging agents of sae2Δ cells. We identified three mutant alleles (SGS1-G1298R, rad53-Y88H and tel1-N2021D) that suppress both the DNA damage hypersensitivity and the resection defect of sae2∆ cells. We show that Sgs1-G1298R-mediated suppression depends on Dna2 but not on Exo1. Furthermore, not only Sgs1-G1298R suppresses the resection defect of sae2∆ cells but also increases resection efficiency even in a wild type context by escaping Rad9-mediated inhibition. In fact, Rad9 negatively regulates the binding/persistence of Sgs1 at the DSB ends. When inhibition by Rad9 is abolished by the Sgs1-G1298R mutant variant, the requirement for MRX/Sae2 in DSBs resection is reduced. Rad53-Y88H and Tel1-N2021 are loss of function mutant variants that suppress sae2∆ cells sensitivity in a Sgs1-Dna2 dependent manner. Furthermore, abolishing Rad53 and Tel1 kinase activity results in a similar suppression phenotype which does not involve the escape from the checkpoint mediated cell cycle arrest. Rather, defective Rad53 or Tel1 signaling bypasses Sae2 function in DSBs resection by decreasing the amount of Rad9 bound at DSBs. This increases the Sgs1-Dna2 activity that, in turn, can compensate for the lack of Sae2. We propose that persistent Tel1 and Rad53 checkpoint signaling in sae2∆ cells causes DNA damage hypersensitivity and defective DSB resection by increasing the amount of Rad9 that, in turn, inhibits Sgs1-Dna2. Replication stress can induce fork stalling and controlled resection can be a relevant mechanism to allow repair/restart of stalled replication forks. We show that loss of the inhibition that Rad9 exerts on resection exacerbates the sensitivity to replication stress of Mec1 defective yeast cells by exposing stalled replication forks to Dna2-dependent degradation. This Rad9 protective function is independent of checkpoint activation and relies mainly on Rad9-Dpb11 interaction. We propose that Rad9 not only regulates the action of Sgs1-Dna2 at DSBs but also at stalled replication forks, supporting cell viability when the S-phase checkpoint is not fully functional.
North, Matthew Howard. "The formation and repair of DNA double-strand breaks in saccaromyces cerevisiae." Thesis, University of Sheffield, 2007. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.489352.
Full textBooks on the topic "DNA double-strand breaks, Sae2"
Al-Zain, Amr M. Mutagenic Repair Outcomes of DNA Double-Strand Breaks. [New York, N.Y.?]: [publisher not identified], 2021.
Find full textYoshikawa, Kenichi, and Fuyuhiko Tamanoi. DNA Damage and Double Strand Breaks. Elsevier Science & Technology, 2022.
Find full textMITOCHONDRIAL DNA DOUBLE-STRAND BREAKS: IN REPLICATION AND IN REPAIR. Shreveport, Louisiana, USA: Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center-Shreveport, Louisiana, USA, 2017.
Find full textDiaz, Robert L. Reduction of DNA double-strand breaks in S. cerevisiae does not change crossover frequency and reveals a novel phenomenon: Crossover homeostasis. 2003.
Find full textStauropoulos, Dimitrios James. An analysis of the interplay between telomeric factors and DNA repair proteins, in the human ALT pathway and cellular response to genomic double strand breaks. 2005.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "DNA double-strand breaks, Sae2"
Falk, Martin, Emilie Lukasova, and Stanislav Kozubek. "Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks." In Radiation Damage in Biomolecular Systems, 329–57. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2564-5_20.
Full textChadwick, K. H. "DNA Double Strand Breaks and Chromosomal Aberrations." In Understanding Radiation Biology, 65–84. Names: Chadwick, K. H. (Kenneth Helme), 1937- author.Title: Understanding radiation biology : from DNA damage to cancer and radiation risk / by Kenneth Chadwick. Description: Boca Raton: CRC Press, [2020]: CRC Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780429288197-4.
Full textChadwick, K. H. "The Molecular Model and DNA Double Strand Breaks." In Understanding Radiation Biology, 3–20. Names: Chadwick, K. H. (Kenneth Helme), 1937- author.Title: Understanding radiation biology : from DNA damage to cancer and radiation risk / by Kenneth Chadwick. Description: Boca Raton: CRC Press, [2020]: CRC Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9780429288197-1.
Full textIIiakis, George, and Nge Cheong. "In Vitro Rejoining of Double-Strand Breaks in Genomic DNA." In DNA Repair Protocols, 473–85. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1608-7_39.
Full textBarone, F., M. Belli, E. Rongoni, O. Sapora, and M. A. Tabocchini. "X-Ray-Induced DNA Double Strand Breaks in Polynucleosomes." In Radiation Carcinogenesis and DNA Alterations, 293–96. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5269-3_19.
Full textChadwick, K. H., H. P. Leenhouts, E. Wijngaard, and M. J. Sijsma. "DNA Double-Strand Breaks and their Relation to Cytoxicity." In Quantitative Mathematical Models in Radiation Biology, 147–58. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46656-4_14.
Full textHendzel, Michael J., and Hilmar Strickfaden. "DNA Repair Foci Formation and Function at DNA Double-Strand Breaks." In The Functional Nucleus, 219–37. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38882-3_10.
Full textFrankenberg-Schwager, M., and D. Frankenberg. "Rejoining of Radiation-Induced DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Yeast." In Advances in Mutagenesis Research, 1–27. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-76232-1_1.
Full textFerdousi, Leyla Vahidi, and Miria Ricchetti. "Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Adult Stem Cells." In Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, 59–82. New York: River Publishers, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003339601-4.
Full textFerdousi, Leyla Vahidi, Haser Hasan Sutcu, and Miria Ricchetti. "Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Adult Stem Cells." In Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, 71–105. 2nd ed. New York: River Publishers, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003339618-3.
Full textConference papers on the topic "DNA double-strand breaks, Sae2"
Xu, Fei, Lili Yan, Jianrong Wang, and Jinming Yang. "Abstract 2491: Beclin1 promotes DNA double-strand breaks repair." In Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2017; April 1-5, 2017; Washington, DC. American Association for Cancer Research, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-2491.
Full textDurocher, Daniel. "Abstract SY07-03: The ubiquitin-based response to DNA double-strand breaks." In Proceedings: AACR 103rd Annual Meeting 2012‐‐ Mar 31‐Apr 4, 2012; Chicago, IL. American Association for Cancer Research, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2012-sy07-03.
Full textKenmotmsu, Takahiro, Naoki Ogawa, Rinko Kubota, Kenji Yoshida, Yukihiro Kagawa, Yoshiaki Watanabe, Yuko Yoshikawa, and Kenich Yoshikawa. "Double-strand breaks on a genomic DNA caused by ultrasound: Evaluation by single DNA observation." In 2013 International Symposium on Micro-NanoMechatronics and Human Science (MHS). IEEE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mhs.2013.6710461.
Full textPuts, Gemma S., Stuart G. Jarrett, Devin Snyder, Richard Vincent, Ying Wang, Katie Leonard, Ben Portney, Feyruz Rassool, Michal Zalzman, and David M. Kaetzel. "Abstract 4846: The metastasis suppressor NME1 is recruited to DNA double strand breaks." In Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2017; April 1-5, 2017; Washington, DC. American Association for Cancer Research, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2017-4846.
Full textLi, Xueyuan, Weiwei Li, Jinxin Kong, Yongmei Qi, and Dejun Huang. "The protective effect of reduced glutathione on cadmium-induced DNA double-strand breaks." In International conference on Human Health and Medical Engineering. Southampton, UK: WIT Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.2495/hhme130521.
Full textOrthwein, Alexandre, and Daniel Durocher. "Abstract IA12: Regulation of the RNF168-dependent response to DNA double-strand breaks." In Abstracts: AACR Special Conference: Cancer Susceptibility and Cancer Susceptibility Syndromes; January 29-February 1, 2014; San Diego, CA. American Association for Cancer Research, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.cansusc14-ia12.
Full textWEI, LEIZHEN, and NATSUKO CHIBA. "ANALYSIS OF BRCA1 ACCUMULATION AT DNA DOUBLE-STRAND BREAKS USING A MOLECULAR IMAGING TECHNIQUE." In Proceedings of the Tohoku University Global Centre of Excellence Programme. PUBLISHED BY IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS AND DISTRIBUTED BY WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHING CO., 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/9781848163539_0049.
Full textLuczak, Michal W., and Anatoly Zhitkovich. "Abstract 1754: Monoubiquitinated γ-H2AX - a more specific biomarker of DNA double-strand breaks." In Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2019; March 29-April 3, 2019; Atlanta, GA. American Association for Cancer Research, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-1754.
Full textLuczak, Michal W., and Anatoly Zhitkovich. "Abstract 1754: Monoubiquitinated γ-H2AX - a more specific biomarker of DNA double-strand breaks." In Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2019; March 29-April 3, 2019; Atlanta, GA. American Association for Cancer Research, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2019-1754.
Full textIshfaq, Talia, Zaain Ahmad, Nourhan Mohamed, Milica Janosevic, Ziyad Abdelrahim, Jessica Georgopulos, and James Fackenthal. "Abstract 4724: DNA demethylation and double-strand breaks affect levels of theBRCA2Δ3 alternate splicing isoform." In Proceedings: AACR Annual Meeting 2020; April 27-28, 2020 and June 22-24, 2020; Philadelphia, PA. American Association for Cancer Research, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2020-4724.
Full textReports on the topic "DNA double-strand breaks, Sae2"
Deininger, Prescott L. The Human L1 Element Causes DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Breast Cancer. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, August 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada474882.
Full textAneva, Nevena, and Gergana Savova. Impact of Different Types Photon Radiation on DNA Double-strand Breaks Repair Process in Microglial Cells. "Prof. Marin Drinov" Publishing House of Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, November 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.7546/crabs.2021.11.14.
Full textZafar, Faria, Sara B. Seidler, Amy Kronenberg, David Schild, and Claudia Wiese. Homologous recombination contributes to the repair of DNA double-strand breaks induced by high-energy iron ions. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), June 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/983115.
Full textPawlowski, Wojtek P., and Avraham A. Levy. What shapes the crossover landscape in maize and wheat and how can we modify it. United States Department of Agriculture, January 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/2015.7600025.bard.
Full textWeil, Clifford F., Anne B. Britt, and Avraham Levy. Nonhomologous DNA End-Joining in Plants: Genes and Mechanisms. United States Department of Agriculture, July 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.32747/2001.7585194.bard.
Full text