To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Discourse linguistics.
Journal articles on the topic 'Discourse linguistics'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Discourse linguistics.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Aijmer, Karin, and Anita Fetzer. "Discourse linguistics." Discourse linguistics: Theory and practice 21, no. 1 (April 7, 2014): 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/fol.21.1.01fet.
Full text
2
Kusse, Holger. "Lingwistyka kulturowa i kulturoznawcza. Od Humboldta do dyskursu." tekst i dyskurs - text und diskurs, no. 13 (2020) (December 30, 2020): 149–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.7311/tid.13.2020.08.
Full textAbstract:
The combination of linguistics and cultural analysis leads back to Wilhelm von Humboldt’s concept of linguistic worldview. In it, a direct connection between thinking and speaking (in a particular ethnic or national language) is presupposed, thus implying the influence of languages on cultures. In contrast to this postulate of the unity of languages and cultures, discourse-sensitive linguistics shows the diversity of varieties within ethno- or national-language-demarcated cultures. Linguistics in cultural studies thus escapes the danger of hypostasis of languages and cultures and methodologically becomes an integrative linguistics in which systemic, pragma- and sociolinguistic methods can be incorporated. Discourse-sensitive cultural linguistics analyzes cultures according to thematic and, above all, institutional discourses (of politics, religion, law, economics, science, etc.) and examines language use down to the level of individual utterances and their linguistic microstructures within the framework of these discursive macro levels. Another type is perlocutionary discourses which almost exclusively aim at the effect of communicative actions: advertising, propaganda, scandalous discourses etc. Discourse types are shown by Russian examples, especially the Russian national hymn, the provocative performances of the group Pussy Riot as an example of scandalous discourses, and state patriotic education as an example of propaganda discourses.
3
Gredel, Eva. "Itis-Kombinatorik auf den Diskussionsseiten der Wikipedia: Ein Wortbildungsmuster zur diskursiven Normierung in der kollaborativen Wissenskonstruktion." Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 68, no. 1 (March 29, 2018): 35–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/zfal-2018-0003.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThis paper presents a corpus study of talk pages on Wikipedia combining morphologic and discourse linguistics approaches. The study reveals that –itis is a highly productive suffix in meta(-linguistic) discourses of the online-encyclopaedia: Wikipedia authors using word formation products with the suffix –itis (e. g. Newstickeritis or WhatsAppitis) try to standardise the collaborative knowledge production with the help of these linguistic innovations. The corpus analysis delivers evidence for the fact that certain linguistic innovations and special types of word formation characterise the community of Wikipedia authors and their discourse traditions. Thereby, this paper contributes to the discussion about digital discourse analysis of natively digital data taking stock of the Wikipedia corpora in the German Reference Corpus (Deutsches Referenzkorpus). The peculiarities of Wikipedia's data will be explained, modes of analysis discussed and the challenges of the suggested integration of morphology and discourse linguistics will be explored.
4
Yang, LIU. "The Methodology of Discourse Research from a Sociolinguistic Perspective." IRA International Journal of Education and Multidisciplinary Studies 14, no. 2 (March 5, 2019): 21. http://dx.doi.org/10.21013/jems.v14.n2.p1.
Full textAbstract:
<p>Systemic Function Linguistics is a mainstream thought of sociolinguistic research and can be a theoretical model and the research methodology of linguistic research. Based on a combination of Systemic Function Linguistics and Sociological Discourse Analysis, this study adopts the thematic progression, ideational function, and interpersonal function to analyze discourses which come from daily used information, to dissect the information to see the discourse structure, in order to advantage the discourse contrastive research for further studies.</p>
5
Shustova, Svetlana V. "MIGRATION LINGUISTICS AND MIGRATION DISCOURSE." Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, no. 2 (2018): 114–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.22250/24107190_2018_4_2_114_125.
Full textAbstract:
The article deals with the impact of increasing migration flows on the language of the host society. The relevance of the topic is due to increased interest of linguists to this issue and the absence of a single comprehensive linguistic theory of the study of migration processes. The object of research is the model of migration discourse. The aim of the article is to try to systemize the theoretical prerequisites of the formation of new scientific field «migration linguistics» and the definition of the concept. To achieve the goal, the author sets the following tasks: analysis of linguistic works of domestic and foreign researchers performed in this direction; the definition of the object and subject of migration linguistics; description of the range of problems of migration linguistics, the definition of the components of the migration discourse model and their language representation.
6
Kon'kov, Vladimir I. "Linguistic studies of political media discourse. Media Linguistics." Media Linguistics 5, no. 2 (2018): 138–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.21638/spbu22.2018.201.
Full text
7
Etelämäki, Marja. "Introduction: Discourse, grammar and intersubjectivity." Nordic Journal of Linguistics 39, no. 2 (September 27, 2016): 101–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s033258651600007x.
Full textAbstract:
This special issue includes a collection of papers on language and intersubjctivity. There are two paradigms in linguistic approaches to intersubjectivity; cognitive linguistics and interactional linguistics, but these two paradigms hardly ever meet. This is due to the fact that these paradigms have opposing views on cognition and mental events. However, both these paradigms draw from phenomenology: whereas cognitive linguistic approaches to intersubjectivity have their basis on Husserl's philosophy, interactional linguistics is influenced by ethnomethodological conversation analysis and the philosophy of Schutz. Despite the apparent differences between these approaches, there are convergences, too. Moreover, both approaches are needed for a full account of language and human intersubjectivity.
8
Zhalko, D. "MARKING INTERDISCURSIVITY / INTERTEXTUALITY IN COGNITIVE LINGUISTICS." MESSENGER of Kyiv National Linguistic University. Series Philology 25, no. 1 (August 26, 2022): 30–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.32589/2311-0821.1.2022.263106.
Full textAbstract:
The article examines the concept of marking interdiscursiveness / intertextuality from the standpoint of cognitive linguistics, in particular, it defines four terms: a) “interdiscursiveness” is a phenomenon that demonstrates the interaction between discourses; it is an indicator of the residue in the discourse of previous discourses, which provide a kind of “preparation “, “raw material” for another discourse; b) “interdiscourse” is a discourse and ideological space in which discourse formations unfold with their relation of dominance, subordination and contradiction; c) “intertextuality” is the interaction of texts not only in terms of content, but also in terms of expression; it acts as a means by which one text actualizes another in its internal space; d) “intertext” is a product of secondary textual activity as a result of processes of secondary categorization of information, its new conceptualization and new representation. The concept of the triad “markedness – marking / mark – marker” is characterized in the context of (inter-)discursive and (inter-)textual processes, where the former consists in the fact that if markedness is a phenomenon, marking / mark is a process, then a marker is a result. At the same time, the definition of the concept of “linguistic marker” is proposed as a clear system of language units of different levels, which expresses the interlevel status of the category of communicative intention and enables the selection of the most optimal among them for expressing the intentional needs of a linguistic personality. Linguistic markers are represented by: (a) discursive markers responsible for non-linguistic knowledge (discourse level), (b) language markers responsible for linguistic knowledge (text level).
9
Dedinkin, A. L. "Legal Discourse as a Multi-Dimensional Integrated Phenomenon and Legal Linguistics as a Syncretic Science." Bulletin of Kemerovo State University 23, no. 1 (April 10, 2021): 220–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.21603/2078-8975-2021-23-1-220-228.
Full textAbstract:
The article introduces legal discourse as part of a complex communicative activity. It is an integrative interdisciplinary phenomenon on the border of jurisprudence and linguistics. The research objective was to establish the constituent parts of legal discourse, which includes legal texts, related scientific literature, and other documents. Legal linguistics is a generalizing discipline that studies the interaction of language and law. The line between legal discourse and other discourses is hard to define. Legal discourse is characterized by unified subjects, procedures, circumstances, and impersonality, that is, the absence of recipient and sender, hence the abundance of impersonal verb forms and impersonal constructions. Legal texts are devoid of national marks, and the vocabulary has equivalents in other languages. The present research was the first to designate a set of texts that make up legal discourse, i.e. texts of laws, decrees, scientific literature on legal matters, various legal documents, judicial texts, texts of interrogations, court speeches, expert opinion, etc. Although legal discourse and legal linguistics have different subjects and tasks, they share the same object, i.e. the interaction of language and law. Legal linguistics is an integrative science based on linguistics and legal theory, which uses achievements of philosophy, psychology, sociology, ethics, cognitive linguistics, pragmalinguistics, linguistic conflictology, etc.
10
Atkinson, Dwight. "Discourse Analysis and Written Discourse Conventions." Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 11 (March 1990): 57–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0267190500001951.
Full textAbstract:
The institutionalized, orconventionalized, properties of human language, somewhat neglected as objects of study in contermporary linguistics, have lately been looked upon with renewed interest. Tannen (1987), for example, synthesizing earlier work by Bakhtin (1981), Becker (1979), and Boliner (1976), has argued for a view of discourse as relatively prepatterned across linguistic domains. Similarly, the notion of “emergent grammer” (i.e., of grammer as “set of …recurrent partials, whose status is constantly being renegotiated in speech”; Hopper 1988:118) has been advanced in opposition to more widely-accepted models of grammatical knowledge. Recent research of this type, as well as a number of older studies, indicates a serious interest among certain linguists in formulating a theoretical basis for the study of conventionalized language.
11
Solovyev, Valery Dmitrievich, Marina Ivanovna Solnyshkina, and Danielle S. McNamara. "Computational linguistics and discourse complexology: Paradigms and research methods." Russian Journal of Linguistics 26, no. 2 (June 29, 2022): 275–316. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-31326.
Full textAbstract:
The dramatic expansion of modern linguistic research and enhanced accuracy of linguistic analysis have become a reality due to the ability of artificial neural networks not only to learn and adapt, but also carry out automate linguistic analysis, select, modify and compare texts of various types and genres. The purpose of this article and the journal issue as a whole is to present modern areas of research in computational linguistics and linguistic complexology, as well as to define a solid rationale for the new interdisciplinary field, i.e. discourse complexology. The review of trends in computational linguistics focuses on the following aspects of research: applied problems and methods, computational linguistic resources, contribution of theoretical linguistics to computational linguistics, and the use of deep learning neural networks. The special issue also addresses the problem of objective and relative text complexity and its assessment. We focus on the two main approaches to linguistic complexity assessment: “parametric approach” and machine learning. The findings of the studies published in this special issue indicate a major contribution of computational linguistics to discourse complexology, including new algorithms developed to solve discourse complexology problems. The issue outlines the research areas of linguistic complexology and provides a framework to guide its further development including a design of a complexity matrix for texts of various types and genres, refining the list of complexity predictors, validating new complexity criteria, and expanding databases for natural language.
12
Kostova, Boryana. "The potential of contrastive analysis in the study of discourse." Studies in Linguistics, Culture, and FLT 10, no. 2 (August 22, 2022): 66–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.46687/yrol6006.
Full textAbstract:
The article focuses on contemporary trends in contrastive studies. As a point of departure the nature, history and evolution of contrastive linguistics are examined. Contrastive linguistics is viewed in relation to other disciplines such as comparative linguistics, comparative historical linguistics, linguistic typology, theory of translation, and foreign language teaching. Any aspect of language may be covered in cross-linguistic studies which involve a systematic comparison of two or more languages both at micro-linguistic and macro-linguistic level. The current trends are identified in terms of macro-linguistic widening of contrastive analysis which is applied in studies of specialized discourses such as media, political and academic communication. The findings are based on a small-scale research of contrastive studies published in Contrastive Linguistics, the oldest international journal for contrastive linguistics. By conducting quantitative and qualitative analysis and employing a diachronic approach conclusions are drawn about the need for the contrastive approach at macro-level, the type of linguistic phenomena studied and the preferred methods of contrastive analysis within a period of forty-six years. The findings show that there is only a slight increase in macro-linguistic analyses in recent years, but contrastive analysis remains a vibrant area of research with a potential for development at discourse level in particular and implications for intercultural understanding and tolerance.
13
Tebble, Helen. "The genre element in the systems analyst’s interview." Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 15, no. 2 (January 1, 1992): 120–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/aral.15.2.07teb.
Full textAbstract:
It has been estimated by those who work in the computing industry that sixty per cent of their time is taken up in communication and only forty per cent is spent on technical work. There is then a clear need to develop the communicative abilities of those in the computer industry. Well designed communication courses for people in computing would benefit from linguistic descriptions of the discourses of this industry. A linguistic description of the structure and genre of the systems analyst’s interview should provide the basis for some of these courses. This paper discusses the genre of the two major types of interviews used by systems analysts and identifies the genre element as the unit of discourse structure that links the lower level and higher level units of discourse structure within systemic linguistics. It draws upon data collected from the depth phase of a national systems analysis project. It is argued that for a full linguistic description of the structure of lengthy speech events within a systemic linguistics framework it is necessary to take both a top down (generic) and bottom up (discourse units) approach.
14
Iedema, Rick A. M. "Legal English." Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 16, no. 2 (January 1, 1993): 86–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/aral.16.2.05ied.
Full textAbstract:
In this paper student Case Notes are analysed to exemplify the degrees of linguistic intricacy that come into play within the context of legal discourse – the ‘target discourse1-and to demonstrate that apprenticeship into this particular academic discourse community involves more than familiarisation with content specific material on the one hand and the control of common English structural conventions on the other. The discussion sets out to show that the intricate and often ‘hidden’ (as in ‘not made explicit’) linguistic demands academic discourses impose on NESB students need to be brought out into the open to highlight and clarify the association between specific lexicogrammatical realisations and generic meanings in the discourse. The paper concludes by emphasising the need for linguistically informed assistance for NESB learners at the tertiary level.
15
Motschenbacher, Heiko, and Martin Stegu. "Queer Linguistic approaches to discourse." Discourse & Society 24, no. 5 (September 2013): 519–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957926513486069.
Full textAbstract:
This introductory essay to the Discourse & Society special issue on Queer Linguistic Approaches to Discourse discusses the theoretical underpinnings of the connection between discourse studies and Queer Theory within Queer Linguistics – a strand of research that has recently gained great momentum. It outlines basic issues in Queer Theory and their repercussions in Queer Linguistic debates and research. The Queer Linguistic objective to provide critical heteronormativity research is then related to Queer Discourse Studies in its various forms and approaches. An overview of the contributions to the special issue and suggestions for future research conclude the article.
16
Cap, Piotr. "Discourse studies: Between social constructionism and linguistics. A critical overview." Topics in Linguistics 20, no. 2 (December 1, 2019): 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/topling-2019-0006.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract This paper gives a critical overview of the analytical approaches dominating the field of discourse studies in the last three decades, from the perspective of their philosophical and formative bases: social constructionism and linguistics. It explores different conceptions of the theoretical nexus between these two bases leading to the emergence of three distinct yet complementary strands of thought (i-iii). The paper starts with poststructuralist views of discourse salient in (i) Laclau and Mouffe’s Discourse Theory. Laclau and Mouffe’s assumption that no discourse is a closed entity but rather transformed through contact with other discourses is taken as the introductory premise to present a large family of (ii) critical discourse studies, characterized as text-analytical practices explaining how discourse partakes in the production and negotiations of ideological meanings. Finally, the paper discusses (iii) three recent discourse analytical models: Discourse Space Theory, Critical Metaphor Analysis and the Legitimization-Proximization Model. These new theories take a further (and thus far final) step towards consolidation of the social-theoretical and linguistic bases in contemporary discourse studies. The empirical benefits of this consolidation are discussed in the last part of the paper, which includes a case study where the new models are used in the analysis of Polish anti-immigration discourse.
17
Stumpf, Sören, and Christian D. Kreuz. "Phraseologie und Diskurslinguistik – Schnittstellen, Fallbeispiele und Forschungsperspektiven." Zeitschrift für Angewandte Linguistik 65, no. 1 (January 1, 2016): 1–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/zfal-2016-0016.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThe following article illustrates connections between the two linguistic subareas of phraseology and linguistic discourse studies. First, it will be shown how phrasemes have been analyzed in linguistic discourse studies and how discourse linguistics approaches have been presented in phraseology so far. Second, the commonalities between these two fields of research will be discussed. And third, the potential of phrasemes within discourse will be demonstrated by way of giving authentic examples from different so called domains (such as sports, religion, society, and politics).
18
Wang, Yongxiang. "“Language” and “discourse”: Two perspectives on linguistic philosophy." Semiotica 2018, no. 224 (September 25, 2018): 295–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sem-2016-0207.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractWith the establishment of modern linguistics and the linguistic turn of western philosophy, various linguistic theories have been advanced and have given different interpretations to language and discourse. Different schools of thought have witnessed a direct collision of ideas and a deep academic dialogue between the theory of translinguistics advanced by the great master of dialogism, Bakhtin, and the outlook on language of the father of modern linguistics, Saussure.
19
Kuznyetsova, Ganna. "Political discourse from the standpoint of the addressee." Cognition, Communication, Discourse, no. 23 (December 31, 2021): 118–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.26565/2218-2926-2021-23-08.
Full textAbstract:
This article is an overview of West-European and Asian linguistic discussion of the issue of the addressee as one of the key components of political discourse. It considers the concept of political discourse addressee as well as the issue of speech influence and discourse manipulation since the latter is the most important characteristic of the type of discourse under consideration. To date, actualization of the addressee in political discourse is not sufficiently studied; hence, there is a respective gap in political discourse studies. This conclusion is made upon reviewing modern trends in political discourse research in West-European and Asian linguistics, critical discourse analysis being the major and the most representative of them, with the contribution of political discourse analysis and critical applied linguistics. The overview shows that the linguistic trends listed above have contributed greatly into the study of discourse, in general, and political discourse, in particular. The article also demonstrates the results of the study of political discourse addressee as groups of voters, conducted in papers on communication theory and PR-practices and argues that such approach appears insufficient as it must be augmented by the study of the addressee in terms of cognitive linguistics. This paper concludes that an addressee of political discourse is not in the focus of modern West-European linguistics and thus requires further in-depth analysis, which can be done by applying the communicative-cognitive approach in its multimodal aspect.
20
Rzeszutko-Iwan, Małgorzata. "Złożoność versus nieograniczoność – czy istnieją granice lingwistyki, interpretacji lingwistycznej, czyli określonego dyskursu naukowego?" Biuletyn Polskiego Towarzystwa Językoznawczego LXXV, no. 75 (December 31, 2019): 127–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.6617.
Full textAbstract:
Complexity vs. limitlessness – are there limits to linguistics, linguistic interpretation, i.e. limits to a specific academic discourse? Summary: This article attempts to answer the question whether there are limits to linguistics, to linguistic interpretation, i.e. limits to a specific academic discourse? The understanding of the term "discourse" adopted in this study is a reference to the theory of culture put forward by Fleischer and Labocha, in which discourse appears to be a cultural category. The adopted understanding of this concept also makes reference to the French School of Discourse Analysis. The concept of discourse is thus identified with the area of human socio-linguistic activity. In order to answer the title question the author of the article identifies three dimensions of academic discourse: cognitive (intellectual), biological and technological. In their context, the author refers to the problem of the limits of linguistics, limits of linguistic interpretation, i.e. the limits of a specific academic discourse. The multiparadigmatism of science, i.e. the multiplicity of research methods and conceptual frameworks describing the vision of the world, the variability of theories, and, therefore, the fact that academic discourse is a cyclical, emergent process with an open outcome, indicate, be it with undeniable limitations, the lack of limits of linguistics and the lack of limits of linguistic interpretation. Streszczenie: Celem artykułu jest próba odpowiedzi na pytanie: czy istnieją granice lingwistyki, granice interpretacji lingwistycznej, czyli określonego dyskursu naukowego? Przyjęte rozumienie dyskursu stanowi odwołanie do teorii kultury, gdzie jawi się ono jako kategoria kulturowa. Odsyła również do francuskiej Szkoły Analizy Dyskursu. Dyskurs zostaje tym samym utożsamiony z dziedziną ludzkiej aktywności społeczno-językowej. Aby odpowiedzieć na postawione pytanie autorka artykułu wyróżnia trzy wymiary dyskursu: poznawczy (intelektualny), biologiczny i technologiczny. W ich kontekście odnosi się do zagadnienia granic lingwistyki, interpretacji lingwistycznej, czyli określonego dyskursu naukowego. Wieloparadygmatyczność nauki jako takiej, tzn. wielość metod badawczych i ram pojęciowych opisujących wizję świata, zmienność teorii, a zatem fakt, iż dyskurs naukowy jest cyklicznym, emergentnym procesem o otwartym wyniku wskazuje, przy niepodważalnych ograniczeniach, na brak granic lingwistyki i interpretacji lingwistycznej.
21
Cap, Piotr. "On the development of the social-linguistic nexus in discourse research." Pragmatics and Society 12, no. 2 (June 3, 2021): 308–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ps.19056.cap.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract This paper gives a critical overview of analytical approaches dominating the field of discourse studies in the last three decades, from the perspective of their philosophical and formative bases: social constructionism and linguistics. It explores different conceptions of the theoretical nexus between these two bases leading to the emergence of three distinct yet complementary strands of thought (i–iii). The paper starts with poststructuralist views of discourse salient in (i) Laclau and Mouffe’s Discourse Theory. Laclau and Mouffe’s assumption that no discourse is a closed entity but rather transformed through contact with other discourses is taken as the introductory premise to present a large family of (ii) critical discourse studies, characterized as text-analytical practices explaining how discourse partakes in the production and negotiations of ideological meanings. Finally, the paper discusses (iii) three recent discourse analytical models: Discourse Space Theory, Critical Metaphor Analysis and the Legitimization-Proximization Model. These new theories take a further step toward consolidation of the social-theoretical and linguistic bases in contemporary discourse studies. The empirical benefits of this consolidation are discussed in the last part of the paper, which includes a case study where the new models are used in the analysis of Polish anti-immigration discourse.
22
Cap, Piotr. "A critical note on the evolution of social theoretical and linguistic underpinnings of contemporary discourse studies." Jezikoslovlje 20, no. 2 (December 11, 2019): 325–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.29162/jez.2019.12.
Full textAbstract:
This paper gives a critical overview of analytical approaches dominating the field of discourse studies in the last three decades, from the perspective of their philosophical and formative bases: social constructionism and linguistics. It explores different conceptions of the theoretical nexus between these two bases leading to the emergence of three distinct yet complementary strands of thought (i–iii). The paper starts with poststructuralist views of discourse salient in (i) Laclau and Mouffe’s Discourse Theory. Laclau and Mouffe’s assumption that no discourse is a closed entity but rather transformed through contact with other discourses is taken as the introductory premise to present a large family of (ii) critical discourse studies, characterized as text-analytical practices explaining how discourse partakes in the production and negotiations of ideological meanings. Finally, the paper discusses (iii) three recent discourse analytical models: Discourse Space Theory, Critical Metaphor Analysis, and Legitimization-Proximization Model. These new theories make a further (and thus far final) step toward consolidation of the social-theoretical and linguistic bases in contemporary discourse studies. The empirical benefits of this consolidation are discussed in the last part of the paper, which includes a case study where the new models are used in the analysis of Polish anti-immigration discourse.
23
Romero-Barranco, Jesús, and Paula Rodríguez-Abruñeiras. "Current trends in Corpus Linguistics and textual variation." Research in Corpus Linguistics 9, no. 2 (2021): i—xiii. http://dx.doi.org/10.32714/ricl.09.02.01.
Full textAbstract:
Corpus Linguistics has proved of great value as a methodological tool in shedding light on how discourse is constructed in different text types. This opening contribution to the special issue “Corpus-linguistic perspectives on textual variation” provides an account of some of the most common applications of Corpus Linguistics, describes some of the most widely used corpora, and pins down some of the most influential corpus-based research works. In so doing, we contextualise the contributions to this collection of articles. The main aim of this special issue is to showcase cutting-edge research on textual variation based on linguistic corpora, thus illustrating how Corpus Linguistics draws from but also feeds a multiplicity of linguistic branches, such as (Critical) Discourse Analysis, Register Studies, Historical Linguistics, and Dialectology.
24
Kossymova, G., and Z. Buribayeva. "APPROACH TO THE PURPOSE CATEGORY IN KAZAKH LINGUISTICS." BULLETIN Series of Philological Sciences 72, no. 2 (June 30, 2020): 115–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.51889/2020-2.1728-7804.17.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the disclosure of the concept of "purpose category" in the Kazakh linguistics. First, the definition was given to the purpose category and the features of its use in various fields were outlined. Research and positions of domestic and foreign scientists are guided by on this issue. The analysis of the purpose category emphasizes the importance of the “addressee factor”. In addition, the methods used in the implementation of the purpose category have been discussed in the article. The analysis of types of speech act has been carried out. The features of this category and its place in the discourse have been revealed.In modern linguistics, discourse as a study occupies a significant place. The ideas of globalization directly generate some discourses, which often remains beyond the attention of researchers, therefore, leads to a decrease in the heuristic possibilities of discourse analysis, which implies not only direct study of the texts, but also consideration of the factors of their generation.Many of the terms used in linguistics, pragma linguistics, psycholinguistics, social linguistics and lingo cultural studies are ambiguous.These include concepts such as discourse. Many studies are intended to uncover the essence of discourse. There are many uses for the discourse and its explanations, but today the concept of “discourse” is becoming very popular, but still requires research.
25
Sytnyk, I. "DISCOURSE STUDIES IN MODERN LINGUISTICS." International Humanitarian University Herald. Philology 2, no. 46 (2020): 123–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.32841/2409-1154.2020.46-2.30.
Full text
26
Covington, Michael A., and Robert D. Bergen. "Biblical Hebrew and Discourse Linguistics." Language 72, no. 1 (March 1996): 180. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/416818.
Full text
27
Daniushina, Yulia. "Business linguistics and business discourse." Calidoscópio 8, no. 3 (December 23, 2010): 241–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.4013/cld.2010.83.08.
Full text
28
Winter, Joanne. "Discourse analysis and contemporary linguistics." Language, Culture and Curriculum 6, no. 2 (January 1993): 177–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07908319309525147.
Full text
29
Kiyko, Y. "DISCOURSE STRUCTURE IN MODERN LINGUISTICS." International Humanitarian University Herald. Philology 3, no. 43 (2019): 132–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.32841/2409-1154.2019.43.3.32.
Full text
30
Gee, James Paul. "Literacy, Discourse, and Linguistics: Introduction." Journal of Education 171, no. 1 (January 1989): 5–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002205748917100101.
Full text
31
Polanyi, Livia. "Discourse Structure and Discourse Interpretation." Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 23, no. 1 (September 17, 1997): 492. http://dx.doi.org/10.3765/bls.v23i1.1263.
Full text
32
Kovalevska, Anastasia. "Language Milton-model Analysis in Political Discourse." Fìlologìčnì traktati 12, no. 2 (2020): 29–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.21272/ftrk.2020.12(2)-4.
Full textAbstract:
The article is dedicated to the analysis of the verbal influence (also known as suggestion) realization phenomenon in political discourse, which is usually understood as a holistic combined image of the text (be it an advertisement slogan, a political program, a speech, or an interview) itself and the emotions of its recipient and addressee. and is aimed at a a political subject’s (politics, political force, power) influencing a political object (audience, electorate, voter). The political discourse is studied from the standpoint of Psychology, Communicative Linguistics, Sociolinguistics, Speech Acts Theory, Advertisement Theory, PR / GR, Political Linguistics and other related sciences, but it is the involvement of such new methods of studying the linguistic and extralinguistic implementation of suggestion in political discourse, influence being its basic function, that emphasizes the relevance of the work, aimed at studying the manifestations of suggestion in political discourses with the help of NLP’s Milton-model analysis. Contemporary political discourse as an array, which, given the specificity of its functioning in today's information society, is characterized by immanent suggestogenicity is the object of the research; while the essential linguistic features of political discourse as a tool for the realization of its programmed suggestibility are the subject. The factual data of the research is represented by recorded media speeches, political advertisement, political programs and press conference speeches of the politicians heading the governments of Ukraine, USA, France, Spain, Italy, Canada, Germany (about 200 items of each class). The author involves the meta- and Milton-model analysis of the text having been researched and developed in the NLP paradigm in order to isolate the actual linguistic influential patterns (markers of language metamodeling processes, simple, complex and indirect inductions). The linguistic algorithm of Milton-model analysis of political discourses having been researched and visually illustrated with relevant examples combines a complex scientific approach within such multisubstrate science as NLP, and thus it will allow not only to single out dominant strategies of constructing texts and mechanisms of these discourses, but also to highlight the ways to counteract their negative effect, as well as serve in the construction of appropriate planning decisions in the field of optimizing the effectiveness of political communication, emphasized the prospects of the research having been presented in the article, as well as its essential practical value.
33
Bekzhanova, Zhazira, and Kussain Ryssaldy. "Efficiency of Binary Lectures in Teaching Major Linguistic Courses (Linguistics of Discourse and Cognitive Linguistics)." Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 214 (December 2015): 430–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.703.
Full text
34
Goatly, Andrew. "Locating stylistics in the discipline of English studies: a case study analysis of A.E. Housman’s ‘From Far, from Eve and Morning’." Journal of Literary Semantics 50, no. 2 (October 1, 2021): 127–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/jls-2021-2034.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Literary stylistics, whose subject matter is literary language, straddles the disciplines of literary criticism and linguistics, as Henry Widdowson pointed out 45 years ago. Since then, developments in discourse analysis and multimodal studies have had the potential to expand the map of the interactions between different disciplines. This case study performs a traditional stylistic analysis of the poem ‘From Far, from Eve and Morning’ from A E Housman’s A Shropshire Lad but also demonstrates the potential for a multimodal perspective on stylistics by relating it to a musical analysis of Vaughan-Williams’ setting of the poem. It begins with a linguistic analysis of phonology, graphology and punctuation, lexis, phrase structure, clause structure and clausal semantics. It proceeds to a discourse analysis of pragmatics and discourse structure. And it ends by relating the linguistic and discoursal analysis to the music through music criticism. By way of conclusion, it suggests that both linguistic analysis and appreciation of musical structure and mood are useful ways into Spitzer’s philological circle, by which linguistic analysis and musical appreciation can pave the way for literary appreciation.
35
ALMOHADAWI, MOHAMMED AKIF, and HISHAM ALI HUSSAIN ALI. "POLITICAL DISCOURSE." Al-Adab Journal 3, no. 142 (September 15, 2022): 59–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.31973/aj.v3i142.3822.
Full textAbstract:
The problem of political discourse appeared as a reaction to the need for generalization, or as an attempt to find common points in the vast variety of political research. This task was set by Foucault when he wrote "The Archaeology of Knowledge", for disciplines "whose boundaries are very blurred, and the content is extremely vague - in the history of ideas, science, thought or knowledge".
Political discourse, apart from the obvious at first glance, the positive results for the study of political phenomena - the possibility of mutual use of different methodological approaches to maximize research of related Sciences (psychology, sociology, linguistics), providing the possibility of determining the object of study, it also raised a lot of issues to be addressed: in particular, the problem of deducing from-under charges of excessive bias in linguistic research, issues, media, politic, problems of structure and form.
36
Bamford, Agnes Marie. "Standardising Fatherhood through Discourse." HERMES - Journal of Language and Communication in Business, no. 62 (December 12, 2022): 87–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.vi62.129703.
Full textAbstract:
A current trend in multinational corporations (MNCs) is a strong focus on diversity management in order to attract and retain talent. The present study investigates the linguistic manifestation and justification of a very recent company policy intended to facilitate this trend, viz., global paternity leave. The study represents an attempt at contributing to the linguistic turn in organisational studies. As a theoretical point of departure, strategic communication and the socio-political and business context for parental leave are discussed. Tools from systemic functional linguistics are then applied as methods to investigate the communication strategies employed when introducing the new family leave policy in four MNCs headquartered in the UK and Norway, respectively. The material consists of a set of texts on global paternity leave produced by the four companies. The analysis identifies similarities as well as differences between the British and Norwegian companies in how the new global leave policy is presented. The findings demonstrate a tension between focussing on gender equality and on inclusion in the justification of the new measure intended to support the MNCs’ diversity management efforts. The study thus shows how language performs ideological work within corporate communication.
37
Solnyshkina, Marina Ivanovna, Danielle S. McNamara, and Radif Rifkatovich Zamaletdinov. "Natural language processing and discourse complexity studies." Russian Journal of Linguistics 26, no. 2 (June 29, 2022): 317–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-30171.
Full textAbstract:
The study presents an overview of discursive complexology, an integral paradigm of linguistics, cognitive studies and computer linguistics aimed at defining discourse complexity. The article comprises three main parts, which successively outline views on the category of linguistic complexity, history of discursive complexology and modern methods of text complexity assessment. Distinguishing the concepts of linguistic complexity, text and discourse complexity, we recognize an absolute nature of text complexity assessment and relative nature of discourse complexity, determined by linguistic and cognitive abilities of a recipient. Founded in the 19th century, text complexity theory is still focused on defining and validating complexity predictors and criteria for text perception difficulty. We briefly characterize the five previous stages of discursive complexology: formative, classical, period of closed tests, constructive-cognitive and period of natural language processing. We also present the theoretical foundations of Coh-Metrix, an automatic analyzer, based on a five-level cognitive model of perception. Computing not only lexical and syntactic parameters, but also text level parameters, situational models and rhetorical structures, Coh-Metrix provides a high level of accuracy of discourse complexity assessment. We also show the benefits of natural language processing models and a wide range of application areas of text profilers and digital platforms such as LEXILE and ReaderBench. We view parametrization and development of complexity matrix of texts of various genres as the nearest prospect for the development of discursive complexology which may enable a higher accuracy of inter- and intra-linguistic contrastive studies, as well as automating selection and modification of texts for various pragmatic purposes.
38
Shin, Dongil. "Linguistic Turn, Critical Linguistics, and Critical Discourse Studies as Research Methodology." Korean Association for Qualitative Inquiry 4, no. 3 (September 30, 2018): 1–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.30940/jqi.2018.4.3.1.
Full text
39
Hao, Jing. "Reconsidering “cause inside the clause” in scientific discourse – from a discourse semantic perspective in systemic functional linguistics." Text & Talk 38, no. 5 (August 28, 2018): 525–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/text-2018-0013.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract The ability to construe and to interpret cause–effect relations is critical to the task of knowledge building in science. It is essential to understanding investigative processes and to interpreting claims. However, in the discourses of science the linguistic construal of cause and effect can be far removed from that of its everyday, commonsense expression. Studies in systemic functional linguistics have found that scientific causality is often realized inside a clause rather than between clauses (Halliday, M. A. K. 1998. Things and relations. In J. R. Martin and R. Veel [eds.], Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science, 185–235. London & New York: Routledge). This paper aims to further understand the challenge of making meanings of scientific causality from a linguistic perspective. I analyze the language of biology in five research articles, which are students’ key reading texts in a core undergraduate biology course at a leading Australian university. I argue that a discourse semantic understanding of “cause inside the clause” is critical for revealing the diverse language resources for constructing scientific causality.
40
Poloczek, Katarzyna. "Paula Meehan’s "Cell": The Imprisoned Dialogue of Female Discourses." Research in Language 12, no. 4 (December 30, 2014): 401–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/rela-2015-0008.
Full textAbstract:
The paper discusses Paula Mehan’s play Cell with focus on the female discourses present in the context of this literary work and the multifold metaphorisation that both the title of the work and the contents invite. The discourses are analysed against the relevant social background and critical literature. The focal types of discourses under discussion involve imagery from maternal and familiar discourse, the “biological” discourse related to hygiene, the sexual discourse, the mock feminist discourse, the discourse of the military and the propaganda of the common good, and the discourse related to the animal world.
41
Martin, James R., Yanmei Gao, Hanbing Li, Chengfang Song, and Minglong Wei. "Martin on discourse semantics, genre, educational linguistics." Language, Context and Text 3, no. 2 (October 15, 2021): 367–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/langct.20003.mar.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract J. R. Martin is a leading scholar who has greatly developed the theoretical framework of systemic functional linguistics (SFL) over the past four decades. Some of these contributions, such as the systems of discourse semantics, the appraisal framework and genre relations have been widely applied in various areas of linguistic studies and language education. The educational linguistic model he and his colleagues have cultivated and developed has attracted the attention of more and more educators from different disciplines around the globe. In this interview, he firstly elaborates on the significance of the concepts of discourse semantics, grammatical metaphor and genre. Then he continues with applications of genre theory in secondary school education, language maintenance, the relation and collaboration between Legitimation Code Theory (LCT) and SFL, and how the two paradigms complement each other. Finally, he introduces some of his recent collaborations with grammarians of different languages.
42
Shukman, Victoria E. "Basic Concepts in German Language Textbooks for Foreigners in the Educational Discourse of Germany." Current Issues in Philology and Pedagogical Linguistics, no. 1(2021) (March 25, 2021): 280–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.29025/1994-7720-2021-1-280-294.
Full textAbstract:
This article is devoted to the identification and research of the basic concepts and their representatives, reproduced in the educational discourse of the Federal Republic of Germany in the practice of learning German as a foreign language. The educational discourse is a system of value-semantic communication of the subjects of the educational process (I.S. Artyukhova). This system is mobile, exists in educational environments of different levels, includes participants of the discourse, educational aims, values and content. The analysis presented in the article is based on the material of the German-language textbook for foreigners of the elementary level «Berliner Platz 1 NEU», used in many universities, language centers and linguistic clubs of Germany and Russia. The relevance of this research is determined by the need to study the verbalization of the linguistic and cultural policy of modern Germany, aimed at the active influx of foreigners, their socio-culturally and linguistically assimilation in the host country, which is reflected in the modern German-language educational discourse. The aim of the research is to identify and describe the basic concepts presented in the educational discourse of Germany on the material of the textbook «Berliner Platz 1 NEU» as a typical textbook of the German language of the elementary level, as well as the linguistic analysis of the lexical elements representing these concepts, therefore, the conceptual analysis of educational discourse is chosen as the main research method. The theoretical basis of the research was the scientific works by N. D. Arutyunova, V. I. Karasik, V. Z. Demyankov, E. S. Kubryakova, E. A. Selivanova and other scientists in the field of discourse analysis and cognitive linguistics. As the result of the research, the basic concepts that form the cognitive base in the minds of foreigners learning German language are identified, the representatives of these concepts that mark the educational discourse of Germany as a whole are analyzed and systematized. This research is interdisciplinary and is applicable for discursive and cognitive research of various educational discourses in linguistics and related humanities.
43
Porubay, Igor Felixovich, and Erkin Tuychiyevich Khakimov. "The Role Of Discourse As A Phenomenon Of Language In Studying Internet-Mediated Communication." American Journal of Social Science and Education Innovations 03, no. 03 (March 25, 2021): 218–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.37547/tajssei/volume03issue03-30.
Full textAbstract:
This article is dedicated to the role of discourse and discourse analysis in the process of the linguistic study of Internet-mediated communication. The article analyses the meaning of the concept of "discourse" in linguistics and modern approaches to this phenomenon. The main properties of the Internet discourse and the boundaries of its discursive space are described.
44
Kondakova, E. A., and O. V. Printsipalova. "Discourse on the Linguistic Implementation of the principles of Political Correctness in German Political Linguistics." NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication 19, no. 2 (June 9, 2021): 143–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2021-19-2-143-156.
Full textAbstract:
The article dwells upon the discourse on the linguistic implementation of the principles of political correctness (hereinafter PC discourse) in the German political linguistic culture. Like the concept of ‘political correctness’ itself, the key characteristics of the PC discourse came to Germany from the USA. However, Germany has a rich tradition of criticism of language use in politics, including a tradition of public reflection on the use of language by totalitarian ideologies. One might assume that the discussion about the linguistic implementation of political correctness in Germany will become part of this general critical discourse. These considerations served as the starting point for this study. The purpose of the presented article is to identify the specifics of PC discourse in Germany against the back-ground of other phenomena of German political linguistic culture. Discourse is understood as a corpus of texts united by reference to a common object of reality, in other words, a way of speaking about a socially significant topic that is formed in society in a certain historical period. On the basis of this interpretation, the empirical base of the study was compiled, obtained through the continuous sampling method from electronic versions of leading German newspapers and magazines, as well as from linguistic monographs devoted to the linguistic implementation of political correctness. Through the method of descriptive discourse analysis, significant methods of discursive interpretation of political correctness have been identified, which are the specifics of PC discourse. The main technique is metaphorical modeling of political reality. For almost thirty years of its existence, the German PC discourse has developed a stable framework of evaluative metaphors that set the perspective of the vision of political correctness. This framework consists of the metaphorical core, which relates political correctness to the conceptual field of “danger”, and additional metaphorical meanings, which actualize the conceptual field of “game”. The uniformity of the metaphorical frame-work reflects the ritualized nature of the argumentation of both supporters and opponents of political correctness. The latter set the dominant discursive strategy - the strategy of imaginary defense, due to which strong emotional pressure is achieved on the participants in the discourse. The metaphorical framework provides discursive unity, which is especially necessary in the context of the semantic diffuseness of the key concept ‘politische Korrektheit’.
45
Kondakova, E. A., and O. V. Printsipalova. "Discourse on the Linguistic Implementation of the principles of Political Correctness in German Political Linguistics." NSU Vestnik. Series: Linguistics and Intercultural Communication 19, no. 2 (June 9, 2021): 143–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.25205/1818-7935-2021-19-2-143-156.
Full textAbstract:
The article dwells upon the discourse on the linguistic implementation of the principles of political correctness (hereinafter PC discourse) in the German political linguistic culture. Like the concept of ‘political correctness’ itself, the key characteristics of the PC discourse came to Germany from the USA. However, Germany has a rich tradition of criticism of language use in politics, including a tradition of public reflection on the use of language by totalitarian ideologies. One might assume that the discussion about the linguistic implementation of political correctness in Germany will become part of this general critical discourse. These considerations served as the starting point for this study. The purpose of the presented article is to identify the specifics of PC discourse in Germany against the back-ground of other phenomena of German political linguistic culture. Discourse is understood as a corpus of texts united by reference to a common object of reality, in other words, a way of speaking about a socially significant topic that is formed in society in a certain historical period. On the basis of this interpretation, the empirical base of the study was compiled, obtained through the continuous sampling method from electronic versions of leading German newspapers and magazines, as well as from linguistic monographs devoted to the linguistic implementation of political correctness. Through the method of descriptive discourse analysis, significant methods of discursive interpretation of political correctness have been identified, which are the specifics of PC discourse. The main technique is metaphorical modeling of political reality. For almost thirty years of its existence, the German PC discourse has developed a stable framework of evaluative metaphors that set the perspective of the vision of political correctness. This framework consists of the metaphorical core, which relates political correctness to the conceptual field of “danger”, and additional metaphorical meanings, which actualize the conceptual field of “game”. The uniformity of the metaphorical frame-work reflects the ritualized nature of the argumentation of both supporters and opponents of political correctness. The latter set the dominant discursive strategy - the strategy of imaginary defense, due to which strong emotional pressure is achieved on the participants in the discourse. The metaphorical framework provides discursive unity, which is especially necessary in the context of the semantic diffuseness of the key concept ‘politische Korrektheit’.
46
Shmurak, R. I. "Formal terms of reproach in Russian discourse." Slovo.ru: Baltic accent 11, no. 4 (2020): 65–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.5922/2225-5346-2020-4-6.
Full textAbstract:
This article is concerned with the formal terms of reproach in Russian discourse and the corpus methods of their identification. Theoretically, it builds on the thesis that there are ‘true’ reproaches that can function autonomously in discourse and be adequately understood outside their context. Practically, the article describes the corpus search for formal terms of reproach. Methodologically, it abandons the synthetic outlook of pragmalinguistics, which dominates Russian linguistics, and treats reproach as a strictly linguistic object that has discursive manifestations. This approach uses methods of corpus linguistics, which ‘visualise’ abstract models through arrays of real-life language data.
47
Novospasskaya, Nataliya V., and Olesya V. Lazareva. "Linguistic Dominants of Grammar and Lexis." RUDN Journal of Language Studies, Semiotics and Semantics 12, no. 3 (October 3, 2021): 537–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.22363/2313-2299-2021-12-3-537-546.
Full textAbstract:
The editorial describes the principles of selection of the issues material and its continuity with already published research. The articles of the issue are devoted to new trends in the study of lexis and grammar in modern languages. Such tendencies of synchronic linguistics as comparative studies of the linguistic picture of the world, the axiological aspect in linguistics of word, text and discourse, as well as contrastive lexicography, translation studies, corpus linguistics, discourse practices and text studies are noted.
48
Pinto, Alexandra Guedes, Catarina Vaz Warrot, Henrique Lopes Cardoso, Isabel Margarida Duarte, and Rui Sousa-Silva. "Deteção de linguagem tendenciosa em decisões judiciais." Revista da Associação Portuguesa de Linguística, no. 8 (October 16, 2021): 203–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.26334/2183-9077/rapln8ano2021a14.
Full textAbstract:
The linguistic expression of subjectivity is a complex phenomenon that has been the object of reflection by several sub-areas of Linguistics and, more recently, of Computational Linguistics. Linguistic subjectivity, in terms of the linguistic expression of the speaker's opinions and attitudes, affects all levels of discourse organization and is present, to different degrees, in diverse textual genres. Subjectivity and bias are connected, in the sense that the presence of bias in discourse has been related, both in Linguistics and Computational Linguistics, to the occurrence of signs of subjectivity.
Court decisions are an argumentative text genre that may convey traces of subjectivity but should not be biased. As a discourse that represents the State’s position on social matters, it should reflect the principle of Equality. Nonetheless, a preliminary analysis of cases of gender violence reveals that this is not always the case. The research proposed in this paper aims to study the linguistic formulations that convey subjectivity and bias in court decisions on gender violence against women. The goal is to develop a linguistic model to detect these instances of bias, with a future possibility of application in a tool for automatic detection of gender bias in discourse, fueled by Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques. A corpus of court decisions on gender violence has been extracted from the public access database of Instituto de Gestão Financeira e Equipamentos da Justiça (IGFEJ), and has been subject to analysis. A set of examples has been compiled in the analytical section of this study, demonstrating the possibility of connecting certain linguistic features, such as mitigation and intensification mechanisms, evidential expressions and counter-argumentative movements, to the presence of subjectivity and bias in discourse.
49
S. Makarova, Tatiana, and Marina A. Khlybova. "DISCOURSE AND DISCOURSE ANALYSIS IN THE CONCEPT OF SOCIOHUMANITARIAN KNOWLEDGE." Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews 7, no. 6 (December 22, 2019): 900–905. http://dx.doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.76135.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose of the study: The aim of the scientific work is to develop a new theory of interdisciplinary discourse based on social and humanitarian knowledge. Today, there are many interpretations of the concept of discourse. This causes certain difficulties in its interpretation. Presentation of the discourse within the multidimensional socio-humanitarian category will allow us to generalize and systematize various approaches to its study, to reveal the sociolinguistic features of the mental-linguistic product in the future integration of social and humanitarian disciplines.
Methodology: The integrative socio-humanitarian theory of discourse analysis highlights the subjective-objective nature of discourse and actualizes the structuralist, poststructuralist, cognitive approaches and its study. The sociolinguistic concept of discourse analysis focuses on the method of synchronous diachronic study of discourse, a descriptive method of discourse analysis, and a comparative historical discourse analysis method.
Main findings: The study found that the theory of discourse, based on a number of humanitarian disciplines (philosophy, sociolinguistics, linguistics), indicates a transformation of the concept of discourse, as well as methods of discourse analysis. A multi-faceted humanitarian concept of discourse analysis is positioned in the post-structuralist, logical-philosophical, sociolinguistic vein.
Applications of this study: The presented integrative interdisciplinary theory of discourse will serve as an impetus for scientific research carried out in the framework of sociolinguistic knowledge. The ontological methodology of discourse analysis, combining the features of structuralism, post-structuralism, cognitivism, is of great practical importance in philosophy, linguistics of the text, communication theory, sociolinguistics, cognitive linguistics.
Novelty/Originality of this study: In the social sciences, there is no single understanding of the concept of discourse. Due to the variability of this concept, various theories of discourse analysis are put forward. For the first time in scientific work, the theory of discourse analysis summarizes the socio-humanitarian theories of discourse (structuralism, poststructuralism, cognitivism). It is demonstrated as a comprehensive research method that allows you to explicate a single utterance, text, as well as cognitive-communicative (speech-cognitive) activity.
50
Srailova, Akmaral B., Kseniia M. Baranova, Alexander K. Kalioppin, Yelena G. Knyazeva, and Olga V. Sergeeva. "Linguostylistic specifics of the pragmatical and symbolic realization of the English poetic discourse." XLinguae 14, no. 2 (April 2021): 215–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.18355/xl.2021.14.02.16.
Full textAbstract:
The article examines linguostylistic specifics of the pragmatical and symbolic realization of the poetic discourse based on English. As the purpose of the work, we analyzed the use of linguistic means of symbolization in the English poetic discourse in the linguopragmatic aspect. The article discusses the importance of stylistic means in English for poetic influence on the addressee. In analyzing verses from pragmalinguistic side is necessary to show their stylistic peculiarities. We did a contextual analysis of poetic works at the text and hypotext levels using the method of symbolic interpretation, stylistic analysis, and linguopragmatic analysis. As the material of the study, we analyzed the poetic works of English poets. The theoretical significance of research results is to identify linguistic specifics of pragmatic and symbol realization of the poetic discourse in the English linguoculture. The study contributes to the development of discursive linguistics, pragmalinguistics, lexicology and stylistics of English, theory of linguistics, linguoculturology. In practical terms, results can be used in teaching the theory of discourse, pragmalinguistics, linguistic analysis of the poetic text, lexicology, and stylistics of English.