Relevant bibliographies by topics / Differences / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Differences'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Differences.
Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 29 January 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Differences.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Banzhaf, H. Spencer. "Difference-in-Differences Hedonics." Journal of Political Economy 129, no. 8 (August 1, 2021): 2385–414. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/714442.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Arkhangelsky, Dmitry, Susan Athey, David A. Hirshberg, Guido W. Imbens, and Stefan Wager. "Synthetic Difference-in-Differences." American Economic Review 111, no. 12 (December 1, 2021): 4088–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.20190159.

Full text
Abstract:
We present a new estimator for causal effects with panel data that builds on insights behind the widely used difference-in-differences and synthetic control methods. Relative to these methods we find, both theoretically and empirically, that this “synthetic difference-in-differences” estimator has desirable robustness properties, and that it performs well in settings where the conventional estimators are commonly used in practice. We study the asymptotic behavior of the estimator when the systematic part of the outcome model includes latent unit factors interacted with latent time factors, and we present conditions for consistency and asymptotic normality. (JEL C23, H25, H71, I18, L66)
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Killian, Kyle D. "Differences Making a Difference." Journal of Feminist Family Therapy 12, no. 2-3 (June 26, 2001): 61–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j086v12n02_03.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Gottschalck, Nicole, Christina Guenther, and Franz Kellermanns. "When Differences Make a Difference." Academy of Management Proceedings 2018, no. 1 (August 2018): 11446. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2018.11446abstract.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Hoare, Graham. "83.10 Differences with a Difference." Mathematical Gazette 83, no. 496 (March 1999): 113. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3618698.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

De Silva, A. W. Brian. "What a Difference...Differences Make." International Journal of Civic, Political, and Community Studies 10, no. 3 (2013): 77–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.18848/2327-0047/cgp/v10i03/43521.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Dretske, Fred. "Differences that Make No Difference." Philosophical Topics 22, no. 1 (1994): 41–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/philtopics1994221/216.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Chen, Zong-Xuan, Kwang Ho Shon, and Zhi-Bo Huang. "Complex Differences and Difference Equations." Abstract and Applied Analysis 2014 (2014): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/124843.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Cobble, D. S. "Response: The Difference Differences Make." Labor: Studies in Working-Class History of the Americas 2, no. 4 (December 1, 2005): 58–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/15476715-2-4-58.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Abadie, Alberto. "Semiparametric Difference-in-Differences Estimators." Review of Economic Studies 72, no. 1 (January 2005): 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0034-6527.00321.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Deno, Stanley L. "Individual Differences and Individual Difference." Journal of Special Education 24, no. 2 (July 1990): 160–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002246699002400205.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Jesse, Jörg. "Differences That Make a Difference?" Federal Sentencing Reporter 27, no. 1 (October 1, 2014): 30–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/fsr.2014.27.1.30.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

PARENS, ERIK. "What Differences Make a Difference?" Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7, no. 1 (January 1998): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s096318019870101x.

Full text
Abstract:
Four years ago The Hastings Center initiated a “pluralism project.” That project gave the Center staff a chance to explore one swath of the theoretical literature concerning how members of democratic regimes ought to think about and respond to the differences among themselves. Much of that literature, produced by philosophers like Charles Taylor, Martha Nussbaum, and John Kekes, is wonderfully articulate about difference in general. But it is nearly silent about how particular categories of difference actually make a difference in the lives of particular individuals negotiating particular institutions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Kim, Kimin, and Myoung-jae Lee. "Difference in differences in reverse." Empirical Economics 57, no. 3 (June 5, 2018): 705–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00181-018-1465-0.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Mannix, Elizabeth, and Margaret A. Neale. "What Differences Make a Difference?" Psychological Science in the Public Interest 6, no. 2 (October 2005): 31–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2005.00022.x.

Full text
Abstract:
SUMMARY—As the workplace has become increasingly diverse, there has been a tension between the promise and the reality of diversity in team process and performance. The optimistic view holds that diversity will lead to an increase in the variety of perspectives and approaches brought to a problem and to opportunities for knowledge sharing, and hence lead to greater creativity and quality of team performance. However, the preponderance of the evidence favors a more pessimistic view: that diversity creates social divisions, which in turn create negative performance outcomes for the group. Why is the reality of diversity less than the promise? Answering this requires understanding a variety of factors, including how diversity is defined and categorized, and the moderating as well as mediating processes that affect the diversity–process–performance linkage. We start with a definition. The word diversity has been used to refer to so many types of differences among people that the most commonly used definition—“any attribute that another person may use to detect individual differences” (Williams & O'Reilly, 1998, p. 81)—while accurate, is also quite broad. As a result, various categorization schemes based on factors such as race or gender, or based on proportions such as the size of the minority, have been used to further refine the definition of diversity in teams. The choices researchers have made in using these categorization schemes, however, do lead to particular tradeoffs. Factor approaches, for example, allow an examination of multiple types of diversity and the interactions among them but ignore the sizes of factions and subgroups. Proportional approaches allow the consideration of minority-group size, and hence the study of issues such as tokenism, but also tend to focus on only one type of diversity and thereby overestimate its relevance relative to other types. The underlying effects of diversity, whichever way it is defined and categorized, have typically been understood through three primary theoretical perspectives: the similarity–attraction paradigm, self- and social categorization, and information processing. These approaches also have their biases. The predictions of similarity–attraction theory are straightforward: Similarity on attributes such as attitudes, values, and beliefs will facilitate interpersonal attraction and liking. Empirical research has supported that surface-level similarity tends to predict affiliation and attraction. The similarity–attraction paradigm was developed to understand dyadic relationships. Yet, individuals can express preferences for membership in particular groups even when they have had no prior social interaction with members of that group. This is primarily a cognitive process of categorization: Individuals are postulated to have a hierarchical structure of self-categorizations at the personal, group, and superordinate levels. Research has demonstrated that the specific categories on which we tend to focus in categorizing others—such as race, gender, values, or beliefs—are likely to be those that are the most distinctive or salient within the particular social context. The act of social categorization activates differential expectations for in-group and out-group members. This distinction creates the atmosphere for stereotyping, in which out-group members are judged more stereotypically than in-group members are. The self-categorization/social-identity and similarity–attraction approaches both tend to lead to the pessimistic view of diversity in teams. In these paradigms, individuals will be more attracted to similar others and will experience more cohesion and social integration in homogeneous groups. The information-processing approach, by contrast, offers a more optimistic view: that diversity creates an atmosphere for enhancing group performance. The information-processing approach argues that individuals in diverse groups have access to other individuals with different backgrounds, networks, information, and skills. This added information should improve the group outcome even though it might create coordination problems for the group. As we disentangle what researchers have learned from the last 50 years, we can conclude that surface-level social- category differences, such as those of race/ethnicity, gender, or age, tend to be more likely to have negative effects on the ability of groups to function effectively. By contrast, underlying differences, such as differences in functional background, education, or personality, are more often positively related to performance—for example by facilitating creativity or group problem solving—but only when the group process is carefully controlled. The majority of these effects have typically been explained in terms of potential mediators such as social integration, communication, and conflict. However, the actual evidence for the input–process–output linkage is not as strong as one might like. Clarifying the mixed effects of diversity in work groups will only be possible by carefully considering moderators such as context, by broadening our view to include new types of diversity such as emotions and networks, and by focusing more carefully on mediating mechanisms. As we delve into advice for organizational teams to enhance the assets of diversity and manage the liabilities, we focus on the benefits of “exploring” as opposed to “exploiting” types of tasks, of bridging diversity through values and goals, and of enhancing the power of the minority. Finally, we end with suggestions for how organizations can learn to create incentives for change within the firm.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Berger, Roberta S., and D. Kim Reid. "Differences That Make a Difference." Journal of Learning Disabilities 22, no. 7 (August 1989): 422–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002221948902200706.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Smoyak, Shirley A. "Diversity: What Differences Make a Difference?" Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services 44, no. 4 (April 1, 2006): 4–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.3928/02793695-20060401-01.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Sasabuchi, Yusuke. "Introduction to Difference-in-differences Design." Annals of Clinical Epidemiology 3, no. 3 (2021): 74–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.37737/ace.3.3_74.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Glynn, Adam N., and Konstantin Kashin. "Front-Door Difference-in-Differences Estimators." American Journal of Political Science 61, no. 4 (June 23, 2017): 989–1002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12311.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Tesio, Melania. "Subtle Differences to Make the Difference." HemaSphere 2, no. 2 (March 2018): e38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/hs9.0000000000000038.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Fredriksson, Anders, and Gustavo Magalhães de Oliveira. "Impact evaluation using Difference-in-Differences." RAUSP Management Journal 54, no. 4 (October 14, 2019): 519–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/rausp-05-2019-0112.

Full text
Abstract:
Purpose This paper aims to present the Difference-in-Differences (DiD) method in an accessible language to a broad research audience from a variety of management-related fields. Design/methodology/approach The paper describes the DiD method, starting with an intuitive explanation, goes through the main assumptions and the regression specification and covers the use of several robustness methods. Recurrent examples from the literature are used to illustrate the different concepts. Findings By providing an overview of the method, the authors cover the main issues involved when conducting DiD studies, including the fundamentals as well as some recent developments. Originality/value The paper can hopefully be of value to a broad range of management scholars interested in applying impact evaluation methods.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Jackson, Susan E. "Differences That Might Make a Difference." Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews 33, no. 11 (November 1988): 964–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/026212.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Houngbedji, Kenneth. "Abadie's Semiparametric Difference-in-differences Estimator." Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata 16, no. 2 (June 2016): 482–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1536867x1601600213.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Mezey, Susan Gluck. "When Should Differences Make a Difference:." Women & Politics 10, no. 2 (March 21, 1990): 105–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j014v10n02_08.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Sant’Anna, Pedro H. C., and Jun Zhao. "Doubly robust difference-in-differences estimators." Journal of Econometrics 219, no. 1 (November 2020): 101–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.06.003.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Becvar, Dorothy S. "Facilitating Differences that Make a Difference." Contemporary Family Therapy 31, no. 1 (December 5, 2008): 1–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10591-008-9081-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Butts, Kyle, and John Gardner. "did2s: Two-Stage Difference-in-Differences." R Journal 14, no. 3 (December 20, 2022): 162–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.32614/rj-2022-048.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Shim, Jae-sun, and Hohyun Kim. "Impacts of the 52-hour Workweek Policy on Employment and Labor Productivity of Listed Firms Using the Difference-in-differences Method." Productivity Review 34, no. 4 (December 31, 2020): 197–224. http://dx.doi.org/10.15843/kpapr.34.4.2020.12.197.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Qin, Jing, and and Biao Zhang. "Empirical-likelihood-based difference-in-differences estimators." Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) 70, no. 2 (April 2008): 329–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9868.2007.00638.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

St. Clair, Travis, and Thomas D. Cook. "Difference-In-Differences Methods in Public Finance." National Tax Journal 68, no. 2 (March 2015): 319–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2015.2.04.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Deng, Wei, Nan Xu, Haotian Li, Fangyao Liu, and Yong Shi. "Difference in Differences in Marketing Performance Measurement." Procedia Computer Science 162 (2019): 275–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.285.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Moss Kanter, Rosabeth, and Richard Ian Corn. "Do Cultural Differences Make a Business Difference?" Journal of Management Development 13, no. 2 (March 1994): 5–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02621719410050219.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Indow, Tarow. "Color difference predicted by color component differences." Color Research & Application 27, no. 6 (October 23, 2002): 425–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/col.10095.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Altschuler, Steven J., and Lani F. Wu. "Cellular Heterogeneity: Do Differences Make a Difference?" Cell 141, no. 4 (May 2010): 559–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.04.033.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Fisher, Charles W. "Making a difference and differences worth making." Teaching and Teacher Education 8, no. 2 (April 1992): 219–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0742-051x(92)90010-z.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

van Gool, Erik. "Differences in orientation behaviour underlie interclonal differences in phototaxis in Daphnia magna." Fundamental and Applied Limnology 144, no. 2 (January 22, 1999): 177–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/archiv-hydrobiol/144/1999/177.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

N.A, Kuldashev. "Agnonym Differences In Names." American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research 02, no. 11 (November 30, 2020): 164–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.37547/tajiir/volume02issue11-28.

Full text
Abstract:
In this article, the author emphasizes on one of the most actual issues of today is the further refinement of the purity of the Uzbek language and the prevention of distortions in the nomenclature and the correct use of words or terms. Not following the traditions of Uzbek nationality in naming will lead to some ambiguities in the language, as well as the elimination of differences in the prefixes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Hooker, John W. "Some differences between difference equations and differential equations." Journal of Difference Equations and Applications 2, no. 2 (January 1996): 219–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10236199608808056.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Ghazanfar, Asif A. "Language evolution: neural differences that make a difference." Nature Neuroscience 11, no. 4 (April 2008): 382–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nn0408-382.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Washam, Cynthia. "Gender Differences Can Make a Difference in Caregiving." Oncology Times 34, no. 1 (January 2012): 9–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.cot.0000410893.25907.45.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Johnson, William G. "There is a difference between differences and disparities." Disability and Health Journal 1, no. 4 (October 2008): 181–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.07.005.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Terwilliger, T. C., and J. Berendzen. "Difference refinement: obtaining differences between two related structures." Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological Crystallography 51, no. 5 (September 1, 1995): 609–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/s0907444994013247.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Lisitsyn, Nikolai A. "Representational difference analysis: finding the differences between genomes." Trends in Genetics 11, no. 8 (August 1995): 303–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0168-9525(00)89087-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Rohlen, Thomas P. "Differences that Make a Difference: Explaining Japan's Success." Educational Policy 9, no. 2 (June 1995): 103–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0895904895009002002.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Suttle, Bruce B. "Truth, morality, and what differences make a difference." Journal of Value Inquiry 28, no. 3 (September 1994): 437–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01079506.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

de Chaisemartin, C., and X. D’HaultfŒuille. "Fuzzy Differences-in-Differences." Review of Economic Studies 85, no. 2 (August 28, 2017): 999–1028. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdx049.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Bergeman, C. S., and A. D. Seroczynski. "Group differences individual differences." Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18, no. 03 (September 1995): 546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00039662.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Hovemann, Marc, and Winfried Sickel. "BESOV-TYPE SPACES AND DIFFERENCES." Eurasian Mathematical Journal 11, no. 1 (2020): 25–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.32523/2077-9879-2020-11-1-25-56.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

RAY, SUBHASIS. "On The Generalized Divided Differences." Mathematical Journal of Interdisciplinary Sciences 5, no. 1 (September 5, 2016): 53–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.15415/mjis.2016.51005.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Katta, Prashanth Kumar. "Enamel and Dentin Adhesion Differences." Indian Journal of Dental Education 10, no. 3 (2017): 170–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/ijde.0974.6099.10317.3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the bibliographies on the topic 'Differences' for other source types:
Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography