Relevant bibliographies by topics / Dialogue between Cardinal Pole and Thomas

Academic literature on the topic 'Dialogue between Cardinal Pole and Thomas'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 10 December 2022
Last updated: 29 January 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Contents

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Dialogue between Cardinal Pole and Thomas.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Dialogue between Cardinal Pole and Thomas"

1

Mazanka, Paweł. "Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński – a man of dialogue." Kwartalnik Naukowy Fides et Ratio 46, no. 2 (June 26, 2021): 341–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.34766/fetr.v46i2.863.

Full text
Abstract:
Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński was not only an “unbreakable Primate”, but above all, a man of dialogue. He was able to meet every person and to talk to them. In his conversations, he listened patiently, he did not impose his opinion and he was mostly trying to seek for common levels of agreement. According to him, the greatest wisdom is to be able to unite, not to divide. The article indicates some sources and forms of this dialogue. It was a supernatural source and a natural one. The first one is a permanent dialogue of the Primate with God, as well as with the Blessed Mother and with saints. Cardinal Wyszyński was a man of deep prayer, and he undeniably took from this source strength for everyday meetings, conversations, and making decisions. The second crucial source was his philosophico-theological education. As a Christian personalist, the Primate took from the achievements of such thinkers as Aristotle, St. Thomas, St. Augustin, as well as J. Maritain, G. Marcel, J. Woroniecki, and W. Korniłowicz. The article discusses some aspects of dialogue with people, taking into account, above all, two social groups: youth, and , and representatives of the communist state power. Presenting Cardinal Wyszyński as a man of dialogue seems to be very useful and topical nowadays because of different controversies and disputes occurring in our state, in our Church and in relationships between the older and the younger generation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Mayer, Thomas F. "Faction and Ideology: Thomas Starkey's Dialogue." Historical Journal 28, no. 1 (March 1985): 1–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x00002193.

Full text
Abstract:
Thomas Starkey's (c. 1495–1538) Dialogue between Reginald Pole and Thomas Lupset is one of the most significant works of political thought written in English between Fortescue and Hooker, for several reasons. It gives insight into its author's intellectual background – Oxford, Paris, Avignon, Padua, Venice – which he shared with many of the other ideologues of the Henrician state. More than that, the Dialogue represents one of the first attempts to blend continental humanism of a Venetian variety, and perhaps Florentine as well, with native English traditions in the creation of a theoretical justification for what Starkey called a ‘mixed state’. In this and in the practical reform proposals which issued from it, Starkey went beyond Thomas More, however superior Utopia may be as a work of literature, or how much more directly it seems to speak to us. The work is also worthy of attention for Starkey's own standing, even if hisinfluence with Thomas Cromwell was shortlived. G. R. Elton has begun this sort of study by using Starkey'sreforms to explore the intellectual underpinnings of the Cromwellian reform. Aside from this effort, interpretation has not been very successful. The Dialogue is undoubtedly a daunting work, not because of the inherent difficulty of its arguments, but rather the extreme eclecticism of the author and his attempt to fulfil two apparently discrepant purposes. It is precisely on this last point that modern criticism has fallen down most seriously. I would like to suggest that placing the work in its proper context in Starkey's life allows not only the recovery of those two conflicting intentions, but also a sketch of the motives underlying them. This will involve an examination of the only surviving manuscript of the Dialogue.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Buck, A. R. "Rhetoric and Real Property in Tudor England: Thomas Starkey's "Dialogue between Pole and Lupset"." Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature 4, no. 1 (April 1992): 27–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/743433.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Buck, A. R. "Rhetoric and Real Property in Tudor England: Thomas Starkey's "Dialogue between Pole and Lupset"." Cardozo Studies in Law and Literature 4, no. 1 (April 1992): 27–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/lal.1992.4.1.02a00040.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Buck, A. R. "Rhetoric and Real Property in Tudor England: Thomas Starkey's “Dialogue Between Pole and Lupset”." Law & Literature 4, no. 1 (March 1992): 27–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1535685x.1992.11015707.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Brigden, Susan. "‘The shadow that you know’: Sir Thomas Wyatt and Sir Francis Bryan at Court and in embassy." Historical Journal 39, no. 1 (March 1996): 1–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0018246x00020653.

Full text
Abstract:
ABSTRACTFrom prison Sir Thomas Wyatt wrote a poem to Sir Francis Bryan, warning him to keep the secrets they shared. This article seeks to discover what the secrets were, and from whom they must be kept. The secrets concerned their lives as courtiers and ambassadors at times of great suspicion and insecurity at home and abroad, c. 1536–41. As diplomats, Wyatt and Bryan were charged to mediate between Henry VIII, Francis I, and Emperor Charles V, but they also had more sinister undercover missions. They were sent to spy upon, and even to assassinate the papal legate, Cardinal Pole. Poetry reveals much about these men which other sources cannot.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Mayer, Thomas F. "A Diet for Henry VIII: The Failure of Reginald Pole's 1537 Legation." Journal of British Studies 26, no. 3 (July 1987): 305–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/385892.

Full text
Abstract:
The triennium 1536–38 marks the crisis of Henry VIII's reign. The palace coup that toppled Anne Boleyn in May and June 1536 and apparently left Thomas Cromwell more firmly in control instead ushered in a series of further threats to both Cromwell and Henry. The upheaval of the Pilgrimage of Grace convulsed the north in late 1536 and early 1537 and looked for a time as if it would shake Henry's throne. The Pilgrims' calls for the upstart Cromwell's removal forced the chief minister to withdraw behind the scenes for a time, always a tricky maneuver. The battle of wits and wills between the king and his cousin and sometime protégé Reginald Pole runs as counterpoint throughout these dislocations. Pole's intemperate attack on Henry's divorce from Catherine of Aragon, De unitate, arrived at the extremely sensitive moment of June 1536 and announced the beginning of an eighteen-month struggle that finally led to an irreparable breach between Henry and Pole. De unitate has often been taken to signal Pole's crossing of the Rubicon. It should certainly have discomfited Pole's potential allies just as many of his partisans thought they had jockeyed themselves into power by engineering Anne's downfall. In fact, the work had a minimal effect, mainly because the committee entrusted with reading it was heavily stacked with Pole's friends. Henry probably never saw De unitate. Despite its violent language, neither Pole nor his supporters were then quite ready to give up on Henry. Early the next year the situation changed. Paul III created the new cardinal Pole a legate and dispatched him to Flanders, traditional locus of plots against England.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Bartlett, Kenneth R. "Thomas F. Mayer, editor. Thomas Starkey: A Dialogue Between Pole and Lupset. (Camden Fourth Series, Vol. 37.) London: The Royal Historical Society. 1989. Pp. xxi, 150. - Thomas F. Mayer. Thomas Starkey and the Commonweal: Humanist Politics and Religion in the Reign of Henry VIII. (Cambridge Studies in Early Modern British History.) New York: Cambridge University Press. 1989. Pp. x, 316. $59.50." Albion 24, no. 1 (1992): 104–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4051255.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Lockwood, Shelley. "Thomas Starkey. A Dialogue between Pole and Lupset. Edited by T. F. Mayer. (Camden Society, 4th Ser., 37.) Pp. xxi + 150. London: Royal Historical Society, 1989. 0 86193 119 X - Thomas Starkey and the Commonweal. Humanist politics and religion in the reign of Henry VIII. By Thomas F. Mayer. (Cambridge Studies in Early Modern British History.) Pp. x + 316. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. £32.50.0 521 36104 4." Journal of Ecclesiastical History 41, no. 4 (October 1990): 687–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022046900075825.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Gunn, S. J. "Literature and Politics in Early Tudor England - Politics and Literature in the Reigns of Henry VII and Henry VIII. By Alistair Fox. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1989. Pp. x + 317. $39.95. - Thomas Starkey: A Dialogue between Pole and Lupset. Edited by T. F. Mayer. Publications of the Camden Society, 4th ser., vol. 37. London: Offices of the Royal Historical Society, 1989. Pp. xxi + 150. $29.00. - Thomas Starkey and the Commonweal: Humanist Politics and Religion in the Reign of Henry VIII. By Thomas F. Mayer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989. Pp. x + 316. $59.50." Journal of British Studies 30, no. 2 (April 1991): 216–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/385981.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Dialogue between Cardinal Pole and Thomas"

1

Starkey, Thomas. England in the Reign of King Henry the Eighth ...: A Dialogue Between Cardinal Pole and Thomas Lupset, Lecturer in Rhetoric at Oxford, Issue 12. Franklin Classics Trade Press, 2018.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Starkey, Thomas. England in the Reign of King Henry the Eighth ...: A Dialogue Between Cardinal Pole and Thomas Lupset, Lecturer in Rhetoric at Oxford, Issue 12. Creative Media Partners, LLC, 2018.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Starkey, Thomas. England in the Reign of King Henry the Eighth ...: A Dialogue Between Cardinal Pole and Thomas Lupset, Lecturer in Rhetoric at Oxford, Issue 12. Franklin Classics Trade Press, 2018.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Thomas Starkey: A dialogue between Pole and Lupset. London: Offices of the Royal Historical Society, University College, 1989.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Mayer, T. F. Thomas Starkey: A Dialogue Between Pole and Lupset (Royal Historical Society Camden Fourth Series 37). Boydell & Brewer Inc, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Mayer, Thomas F. Thomas Starkey: A Dialogue Between Pole and Lupset (Royal Historical Society Camden Fourth Series, No 37). Royal Historical Society, 1989.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Dialogue between Cardinal Pole and Thomas"

1

"Rethinking the Three Estates: Thomas Starkey’s “Dialogue Between Lupset and Pole,” 1529–1532." In Social Thought in England, 1480-1730, 230–55. New York : Routledge, 2016. | Series: Routledge research in early modern: Routledge, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315665504-22.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Garnett, George. "The Conquest in Later Medieval English Law II." In The Norman Conquest in English History, 247–85. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198726166.003.0008.

Full text
Abstract:
Chapter 7 begins with the resurrection in Edward II’s reign of the London Collection of the Leges Anglorum, which had first been composed in John’s reign. They were commissioned by Andrew Horn, Chamberlain of the city. More recent works were appended to the Collection, including the Mirror of Justices. The role of this rejuvenated Collection in the politics of the reign is examined, with particular reference to the new clauses of the coronation oath devised in 1308. Items in the Collection are linked with the Modus tenendi parliamentum of 1320-1The chapter then pursues the Conquest as a point of reference through records of later medieval forensic practice, particularly as recorded in the Year Books, and the great works of later medieval jurisprudence. Those of Sir John Fortescue are shown to be exceptional, in that he continued to be explicit about viewing English law in a broad historical perspective, which he showed had traversed the Conquest. Thomas Littleton’s Tenures, Anthony Fitzherbert’s Abridgement, and Year Book cases are adduced as evidence of more conventional, less historically attuned attitudes. The chapter concludes with a consideration of two jurisprudential works of the 1530s—St German’s Dialogue between Doctor and Student and Starkey’s Dialogue between Pole and Lupset—and the sudden interest of government propagandists in the London Collection of the Leges Anglorum, as evidenced by compendium of historical precedent known as Collectanea satis copiosa.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography