Relevant bibliographies by topics / Dialogic jurisprudence

Academic literature on the topic 'Dialogic jurisprudence'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Contents

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Dialogic jurisprudence.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Dialogic jurisprudence"

1

Swanson, Elizabeth. "Rape, Representation, and the Endurance of Hegemonic Masculinity." Violence Against Women 25, no. 13 (September 10, 2019): 1613–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1077801219869551.

Full text
Abstract:
This article mines the history of rape jurisprudence to illuminate how the legal treatment of wartime rape informs long-standing gendered tropes that dominate its understanding on the ground as well as its representation in literary and cultural texts. The essay concludes by reading Congolese novelist Emmanuel Dongala’s Johnny Mad Dog as a model for a dialogic literary imagination capable of revealing the fatal consequences of toxic masculinity as it informs not only the perpetration of rape in wartime, but also the possibility for either perpetrator or victim to achieve subjectivity free from the burdens of brutally constraining gender norms.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Faizah, Nur. "KONSEP QIWĀMAH DALAM YURISPRUDENSI ISLAM PERSPEKTIF KEADILAN GENDER." Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 11, no. 1 (April 30, 2019): 13. http://dx.doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2018.11102.

Full text
Abstract:
This article explains the concept of leadership in the family (qiwāmah) gender justice perspective. The focus of the study on the interpretation of Surat an-Nisā '[4] verse 34 which becomes the theological and socio-cultural foundation of society. The letter interprets that the husband is superior to the wife, so marriage relations tend to be hierarchical (the husband becomes the head of the family, while the wife has the subordinate status). This lame husband and wife relationship makes the wife vulnerable to violence. The author considers that this verse must be reinterpreted from the point of view of gender justice given the sociological shift. This study led the writer to the conclusion that the concept of qiwāmah in Islamic jurisprudence is open and dialogic with the times. The concept of qiwāmah now must be interpreted based on human values rather than gender, so that women as wives not only serve their husbands, but partners and partners who are both subjects and objects. The relationship between them is in the form of symbiosis of mutualism (mutual benefit), not only in the family but also for the community and the State. There is no difference between the two, except in matters of devotion to God. [Artikel ini menjelaskan konsep kepemimpinan dalam rumah tangga (qiwāmah) perspektif keadilan gender. Fokus kajian pada penafsiran Surat an-Nisā’ [4] Ayat 34 yang menjadi landasan teologis dan sosio-kultural masyarakat. Surat tersebut menafsirkan bahwa suami lebih unggul daripada istri, sehingga hubungan perkawinan cenderung hierarkis (suami menjadi kepala keluarga, sementara istri berstatus subordinat terhadapnya). Relasi suami istri yang timpang ini membuat istri rentan terhadap kekerasan. Penulis memandang bahwa ayat ini harus ditafsir ulang dari sudut pandang keadilan gender mengingat adanya pergeseran sosiologis. Kajian ini mengantarkan penulis pada kesimpulan bahwa konsep qiwāmah dalam yurisprudensi Islam bersifat terbuka dan dialogis dengan perkembangan zaman. Konsep qiwāmah sekarang harus dimaknai berdasarkan nilai-nilai kemanusiaan bukan jenis kelamin, sehingga perempuan sebagai istri bukan hanya melayani suaminya, melainkan patner dan mitra yang sama-sama menjadi subyek sekaligus obyek. Relasi keduanya berupa simbiosis mutualisme (saling menguntungkan), tidak hanya dalam keluarga tetapi juga untuk masyarakat dan Negara. Tidak ada perbedaan di antara keduanya, kecuali dalam hal ketakwaan kepada Tuhan.]
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

الحوامدة, إيصال صالح. "عروض مختصرة." الفكر الإسلامي المعاصر (إسلامية المعرفة سابقا) 24, no. 93 (July 1, 2018): 202–195. http://dx.doi.org/10.35632/citj.v24i93.2499.

Full text
Abstract:
التراث عند طه عبد الرحمن، أحمد كروم، بيروت: المؤسسة العربية للفكر والإبداع، 2018م، 120 صفحة. النقد الائتماني للأنموذج الدهراني في فلسفة طه عبد الرحمن، آسيا عقوني، عمان: دار الأيام للنشر والتوزيع، 2018م، 176 صفحة. علم الكلام الجديد مدخل لدراسة اللاهوت الجديد وجدل العلم والدين، تحرير: عبد الجبار الرفاعي، بيروت: دار التنوير ، 2016م، 528 صفحة. المقاصد السَّنية في بيان القواعد الشرعية، عبد الوهاب الشعراني، تحقيق: يوسف رضوان اللكود، عمان: دار الفتح للنشر والتوزيع ، 2016م، 635 صفحة. قاعدة التقديرات الشرعية دراسة نظرية تأصيلية تطبيقية، د. حاتم محمـد بوسمة، بيروت: دار ابن حزم، 2016م، 157 صفحة. دلالة قاعدة الأمور بمقاصدها وتطبيقاتها الفقهية، غفران أحمد قاسم الأعظمي، عمان: دار النور المبين، 2018م، 296 صفحة. البيوإتقيا والفلسفة من الإنسان الفائق إلى الإنسان المتزكي، نورة بو حناش، بيروت : المؤسسة العربية للفكر والإبداع، 2017م، 412 صفحة. الدين والإنسان والعالم قراءات في أفكار إسلامية معاصرة، تحرير: هبة رؤوف عزت، القاهرة : دار المرايا للإنتاج الثقافي، 2017م، 416 صفحة. ظاهرة نقد الدين في الفكر الغربي الحديث، سلطان بن عبد الرحمن العميري، لندن: تكوين للدراسات والأبحاث، 2018م، 1352 صفحة. الديني والدنيوي نقد الوساطة والكهنتة، عبد الإله بلقزيز، بيروت: منتدى المعارف، 2018م، 400 صفحة. قواعد الاستدلال بين المتكلمين والفلاسفة في القرنين الرابع والخامس الهجريين دراسة تحليلة مقارنة، أحمد حسن شحاتة، بيروت: مركز نماء للبحوث والدراسات، 2017، 712 صفحة. نقد العقل في الفكر العربي المعاصر: أبو يعرب المرزوقي أنموذجاً، حنان لاكلي، لاتفيا: النشر نور، 2017، 224 صفحة. Sartre on Sin: Between Being and Nothingness (Oxford Theology and Religion Monographs),Kate Kirkpatrick, Oxford University Press, 2017, 262 pages. An Introduction to Islamic Jurisprudence, Daniel (Ghasem) Akbari , AutherHouse, 2017, 94 pages. Islamic Modernities in Southeast Asia: Exploring Indonesian Popular and Visual Culture (Asian Cultural Studies: Transnational and Dialogic Approaches), Leonie Schmidt, London: Rowman & Littlefield international, 2017, 210 pages. The Understanding of Maqasid al-Shariah Through Usul Fiqh Mechanism, Mohd Noh & Mohd Shahid, LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, 2016, 88 pages. للحصول على كامل المقالة مجانا يرجى النّقر على ملف ال PDF في اعلى يمين الصفحة.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Mukherjee, Gaurav. "The Supreme Court of India and the Inter-Institutional Dynamics of Legislated Social Rights." Verfassung in Recht und Übersee 53, no. 4 (2020): 411–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/0506-7286-2020-4-411.

Full text
Abstract:
The jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of India is generally celebrated in the academic literature for its creative use of constitutional interpretation to read in certain socioeconomic rights into the ‘right to life’ provision despite their textual absence from the Constitution. However, this line of case law made the obtainment of a judicial remedy highly conditional upon an extant scheme or law, was necessarily piecemeal, deferent to the executive, and incapable of fixing precise accountability upon a violation or addressing issues of systemic material insufficiency. Much of this had to do with the absence of a rights-based legislative framework. The enactment of the Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005 (MGNREGA) and the National Food Security Act, 2013 (NFSA) presented major developments in the livelihood and food security regimes in India, and a leap forward for legislated social rights. These legislations consolidated, expanded and entrenched a number of existing rights which had come into being through judicial decisions. In this paper, I examine the antecedents of social rights in India, and show the afterlife of disagreements over appropriateness, practicality and affordability, which resulted in the adoption of the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP) in the Indian Constituent Assembly, persist in legislative design and judicial reasoning. In this paper, I analyse judicial treatment of these laws and propose a novel theoretical framework for better understanding them. The theoretical framework has discursively antagonistic and discursively catalytic components, and sheds light on the inter-branch institutional dynamic which arises when NFSA and MGNREGA based public interest litigation (PIL) is activated. I suggest that such PIL and the kinds of complex, dialogic remedies which result from them have effects in the political, legal, and social fields. These remedies result in a form of hybridized politico-legal accountability that enables the Supreme Court of India to safeguard its institutional capital, while also being able to better engage with concerns such as polycentricity, democratic legitimacy, lack of expertise, federalism, and the separation of powers.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Robert, Aurélien. "Relativisme et jurisprudence. Un dialogue entre philosophes et historiens." Tracés, no. 12 (May 31, 2007): 167–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/traces.217.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Frese, Amalie, and Henrik Palmer Olsen. "Spelling It Out−Convergence and Divergence in the Judicial Dialogue between cjeu and ECtHR." Nordic Journal of International Law 88, no. 3 (August 29, 2019): 429–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718107-08803001.

Full text
Abstract:
In this article we investigate the relationship between the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights as it manifests in explicit cross-references between the two Courts’ jurisprudence. The analysis detects cross-references, how they are used and indications of converge or divergence in the jurisprudence through their explicit citations and references. Our dataset consists of the entire corpus of judgments from both Courts from 2009 (when the EU Charter on Fundamental Rights came into force and until the end of 2016. On the basis of a content search for references to the other Court in both corpora we detect all their cross-references. We find that 1) the Courts’ use each other’s case law surprisingly little, but when they do, it is 2) primarily within the legal domains of criminal justice and immigration policies, and 3) displaying convergence towards the jurisprudence of the other Court.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Calle Meza, Melba Luz. "Le lien de causalité et la responsabilité des hôpitaux publics à l’époque de la révolution médicale. Une étude de la jurisprudence administrative française à la fin du XXe si&." Diálogos de saberes, no. 39 (December 1, 2013): 21–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.18041/0124-0021/dialogos.39.2013.1814.

Full text
Abstract:
Dans cet article le traitement de la causalité est analysé dans la jurisprudence du Conseil d’État et de tribunaux administratifs français sur la responsabilité des hôpitaux publics, au cours de la période dite de la révolution médicale, à la fin du XXe siècle. Ce furent des années de grands changements liés aux progrès de la science médicale, et des services de santé publique. De même, ce furent les années de la réforme du contentieux administratif. Et on a constaté que, en plus des difficultés d’établir le lien de causalité, les dits progrès ont pu intervenir au développement d’outils juridiques innovateurs, tels comme, la présomption de faute et la présomption de causalité, entre autres. Cette inclination du juge administratif peut être considérée justifiée parce que à ces formes juridiques la condition requise de certitude absolue est réduite en matière du lien causal. Cela pourrait découler, de même, de la considération, de la part du juge, de la gravité extrême des dommages d’habitude causés aux victimes par les déficiences dans la prestation du service de santé publique. De la même façon, ladite orientation jurisprudentielle pourrait être interprétée comme une position avancée du juge administratif français de principes des années quatre-vingt-dix sur les méthodes d’évaluation de la causalité. Une ligne peut-être progressiste du juge administratif français qui peut lancer des lumières, depuis une perspective comparée et historique, sur les actuelles études qui dans cette matière sont réalisées dans les pays dont la jurisprudence s’est traditionnellement inspirée du Droit français, comme il est arrivé en Colombie. De même, au XXIe siècle certain degré d’incertitude se reconnaît dans cette question dans laquelle la causalité probabilistique est acceptée. Dans nos jours, la tendance semble être la consolidation d’une distinction nette entre le lien de causalité et l’imputation de la responsabilité administrative.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Psychogiopoulou, Evangelia. "Judicial Dialogue in Social Media Cases in Europe: Exploring the Role of Peers in Judicial Adjudication." German Law Journal 22, no. 6 (September 2021): 915–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/glj.2021.57.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThis Article aims to examine the social media jurisprudence of national courts in a selected set of EU Member States by focusing on judicial dialogue specifically via references to the case law of other courts. Do judges in social media cases engage with the case law of peers, and if so how and to what extent? The analysis investigates whether national judges draw on the jurisprudence of higher domestic courts, foreign courts and/or European supranational courts—the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)—and explores the use of such jurisprudence. It is based on 147 cases from the constitutional and/or supreme courts of Bulgaria, Croatia, Greece, Italy, Latvia, Slovakia, and Slovenia. Although judicial dialogue is generally limited in the cases under study, the analysis illustrates the different ways in which courts interact with the rulings of peers and informs on the latter’s contribution to judicial assessment.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Jara Huérfano, Leonel Darío. "Estado garante del Derecho a la Salud de las personas privadas de la libertad." Diálogos de saberes, no. 46 (December 30, 2017): 79–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.18041/0124-0021/dialogos.46.1595.

Full text
Abstract:
La responsabilidad del Estado es un tema que ha despertado el interés de la academia y la jurisprudencia. Las posiciones al respecto han generado diversas interpretaciones a partir de las cuales se formuló el siguiente eje problémico: ¿A partir de qué régimen de imputación debe abordarse la responsabilidad del Estado en los eventos de los daños ocasionados a las personas privadas de la libertad, por la prestación de los servicios de salud en los centros penitenciarios y carcelarios en Colombia? Para el caso se abordarán los diversos títulos jurídicos de imputación señalados por la jurisprudencia del Consejo de Estado y la Corte Constitucional, frente a las diferentes formas de daño, a partir de la revisión del régimen normativo nacional e internacional de protección del derecho a la salud en las cárceles, de los fundamentos dogmáticos inherentes, así como a partir de la identificación jurisprudencial del Consejo de Estado encargado de imputar y/o eximir al Estado administrativa y patrimonialmente en la prestación de servicios de salud a las personas privadas de la libertad, apoyado en una investigación de corte descriptivo con preminencia del método de análisis-síntesis.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Almeida, Paula Wojcikiewicz. "The Asymmetric Judicial Dialogue Between the ICJ and the IACtHR: An Empirical Analysis." Journal of International Dispute Settlement 11, no. 1 (November 27, 2019): 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idz015.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract This article evaluates the judicial dialogue between the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR). It aims to discuss, on the one hand, the use of the ICJ jurisprudence in the case law of the Inter-American Court and the use of the IACtHR jurisprudence in the case law of the ICJ, on the other hand. Being aware that the ICJ and the IACtHR are placed in different levels and possess structural differences, the judicial dialogue between these two courts is inevitably marked by asymmetries. The empirical analysis of the interaction between the ICJ and the IACtHR aims to identify the functions of the judicial dialogue, which encompass the general cross-fertilization function and the function of enhancing the persuasiveness, authority or legitimacy of individual judicial decisions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Dialogic jurisprudence"

1

Stelzig-Caron, Slovia. "La cour de cassation et le dialogue des juges." Thesis, Grenoble, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011GRENA008/document.

Full text
Abstract:
Le dialogue des juges recouvre plusieurs réalités. L'aspect qui est étudié ici est le dialogue qui s'instaure entre la Cour de cassation et les autres juges : nationaux, européens, internationaux et étrangers. Ce dialogue se fait à travers la décision de justice, qui est désormais accessible et diffusée dans le monde entier grâce à internet et aux sites de la juridiction. Ce phénomène, appelé aussi « influence croisée des jurisprudences », prend naissance avec l'expansion de la science comparative et commence à se manifester dans la jurisprudence de la Haute juridiction judiciaire. Encore en voie de développement, le dialogue des juges n'est pas sans produire certaines conséquences quant à la place de la Cour de cassation sur la scène nationale, mais aussi sur la scène internationale. Par ailleurs, il devrait se révéler prochainement comme un nouvel instrument au service des magistrats
The dialogue between judges covers several realities. The aspect studied in this thesis is the dialogue between the French Court of Cassation and the other judges: national, European, international and foreign judges. This dialogue between judges takes place through the courts decisions which can be available and read on internet. This phenomenon is recent and was born with the growth of the comparative science. We can establish that the dialogue between judges in France is going to grow in a near future. We can also see that the dialogue between judges as already made some consequences. First, it has given a new place for the French court in the national and international stage. Then, it can be used as an actual instrument for judges
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Bobić, Ana. "The jurisprudence of constitutional conflict in the European Union." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2017. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:11f62d7d-3eba-43de-8d41-144ca733b1c0.

Full text
Abstract:
The aim of the thesis is to address the jurisprudence of constitutional conflict between the Court of Justice and national courts with constitutional jurisdiction. It seeks to determine how the principle of primacy of EU law works in reality and whether the jurisprudence of the courts under analysis supports this concept. In so doing, the goal is to determine if the theory of constitutional pluralism can explain and guide the application of the principle of primacy of EU law in the jurisprudence of constitutional conflict. The analysis has been carried out on two levels. First, by exploring sovereignty claims by the courts under analysis, as well as reconciliatory vocabulary they employ to manage and contain constitutional conflict. Second, by further studying the three areas of constitutional conflict - ultra vires review, identity review, and fundamental rights review - to provide more nuance in the analysis of the way the Court of Justice has expanded the self-referential system of the Treaties; the different limits that constitutional adjudicators have placed on the principle of primacy as a result; and what possible solutions they envisage in the event of a constitutional conflict. All the courts under analysis have employed the vocabulary of mutual respect and self-restraint as principles guiding the resolution of constitutional conflict. Constitutional conflict is managed through incremental and permanent contestation and accommodation of their opposing claims to sovereignty (the auto-correct function of constitutional pluralism) that results in the uniform interpretation and application of Union law, but keeping in line with conferral as its defining principle. The analysis demonstrated the existence of a heterarchical constellation - the potential of all the courts involved for being ranked in a number of different ways at different times - grounded in mutual respect and self-restraint.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Abeille, Etienne. "Le dialogue entre la loi et la jurisprudence dans le droit de la responsabilité médicale." Aix-Marseille 3, 2009. http://www.theses.fr/2009AIX32016.

Full text
Abstract:
Auparavant, la matière du contentieux médical, hormis quelques textes épars et lacunaires, relevait surtout d’un traitement jurisprudentiel. La jurisprudence, en ces diverses occasions, n’a pas seulement répondu au cas par cas aux attentes des justiciables, elle a aussi fait une véritable œuvre doctrinale, construisant un droit de la responsabilité médicale. Toutefois, le juge n’est pas le législateur et ce dernier a estimé, à un moment donné, devoir intervenir pour gérer une réorganisation générale de cette responsabilité médicale. Ainsi, il a voulu lutter contre certaines évolutions jurisprudentielles et mettre un terme à plusieurs divergences, en particulier entre l’ordre administratif et judiciaire. Il a également été sensible au souhait d’accélérer fortement l’indemnisation des victimes. Ce faisant, il n’est pas discutable que le législateur était dans son rôle. Cette intervention « massive » et « offensive » de la loi de 2002, fait contraste, frontalement, avec la situation antérieure où dominait la jurisprudence. Du coup, est posée la question classique, récurrente, des rapports de la jurisprudence et de la loi
Above all, except some scattered and incomplete texts, medical disputes issues are binded by case law and jurisprudence. In theses matters, court decisions helped in not only answered personal issues but also ruled what can be called the medical liability rights. However, under french medical system, rules can only be made by the congress and not the judge. That’s the reasons why the congress intervened to challenge some contradictory court decisions that couldn’t lead to a clear applicable rule. One of congressists’ achievments was to help victims to be indemnified as quick as possible. This massive intervention and offensive of the law of 2002, made contrast, frontally, with the former situation dominated by case law decision. In fact, this situation leads to the classical issue of the difference between rules edicted by the law or by the court decisions
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Kouomou, Simo Landry. "Le changement de circonstances dans la jurisprudence du Conseil constitutionnel." Thesis, Paris 1, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017PA01D051.

Full text
Abstract:
Le changement de circonstances est un instrument permettant au Conseil constitutionnel d'affermir l'autorité de ses décisions, tant par le dialogue, que par la cohérence. En tant qu'instrument d'autorité par le dialogue, la notion fait écho à la jurisprudence administrative du Conseil d'Etat. Le Conseil constitutionnel a transposé cette technique au contentieux constitutionnel, ce qui a pour effet de renforcer son caractère juridictionnel. Mais cette réception s'est faite progressivement, évolution consacrée par le législateur organique en 2009. La recherche d'une autorité par le dialogue se manifeste également dans la conception du phénomène du changement de circonstances. Une conception à la fois extensive des circonstances et restrictive du changement. La prise en compte de la notion permet aussi d'affermir l'autorité des décisions du Conseil constitutionnel par la cohérence. C'est d'abord la jurisprudence du Conseil qui gagne en cohérence, en ce que la notion a une fonction de dérogation, mais aussi de justification. Ce sont aussi les normes qui gagnent en cohérence, puisque le changement de circonstances de droit conduit à la cohérence des normes à leur environnement juridique, tandis que le changement de circonstances de fait, qui trouve sa justification dans le besoin d'adaptation du droit à son contexte factuel, renforce le caractère concret du contrôle de constitutionnalité, et renforce la participation du Conseil constitutionnel à la fonction législative
No English summary available
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Xenou, Lamprini. "Les principes généraux du droit de l'Union européenne et la jurisprudence administrative française." Thesis, Paris 2, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014PA020078.

Full text
Abstract:
Dégagés de façon prétorienne par la Cour de justice, les principes généraux du droit de l’Union occupent dans la jurisprudence administrative française une place que peut expliquer la notion de dédoublement fonctionnel. D’une part, ce sont des normes obligatoirement appliquées par le juge national dans le champ du droit de l’Union.D’autre part, en dehors du champ, ils constituent une source d’inspiration pour le Conseil d’Etat dans la création et l’interprétation des principes généraux du droit français. Dans le premier cas, le juge administratif est garant du respect de ces principes.Fidèle aux exigences de la Cour de justice, il assume pleinement son rôle de juge de droit commun de l’application des principes du droit de l’Union. Dans le second cas, il devient acteur de la circulation des principes en Europe. Toutefois la coexistence des principes peut engendrer des tensions, accentuées par la difficulté à délimiter le champ du droit de l’Union, incertain et en pleine expansion. C’est pourquoi la thèse propose le déploiement d’une politique jurisprudentielle de convergence, dans laquelle le juge administratif affirmerait explicitement son souci de s’inspirer des principes du droit de l’Union. Ces derniers, combinés avec les principes issus de la Charte des droits fondamentaux, de la CEDH et des ordres nationaux, semblent donner naissance à une nouvelle catégorie de source matérielle : les principes européens communs. L’originalité de celle-ci, qui la différencie de toute autre source, est de constituer une oeuvre collective des juges en Europe, dans laquelle ces derniers puisent leur inspiration pour créer de nouveaux principes ou interpréter les principes existants
The general principles of EU law, which are a judicial creation of the Court of Justice, play a role in French administrative case law that can be explained by the notion of functional duplication (“dédoublement fonctionnel”). On the one hand, the general principles of EU law are rules that are mandatorily applied by the national courts within the scope of EU law. On the other hand, beyond that scope, they constitute a source of inspiration for the Conseil d’Etat in creating and interpreting general principles of French administrative law. In the first case, the administrative courts are the primeguarantors of compliance with these principles. In line with the requirements of theCourt of Justice, they entirely fulfill their role as the ordinary courts applying principles of EU law. In the second case, they become one of the protagonists of the movement of principles in Europe. However, the coexistence of principles could trigger tensions,heightened by the difficulties in delineating the scope of principles of EU law, which is uncertain and rapidly expanding. That is why the thesis proposes the development of a judicial convergence policy, in which the administrative courts would more clearly affirm their concern to take inspiration from the general principles of EU law. These latter, combined with the principles stemming from the Charter of Fundamental Rights,the ECHR and the national orders, seem to give rise to a new category of material source: the common European principles. The originality of this category, which differentiates it from any other source, is that it constitutes a collective work of judges inEurope, from which they draw their inspiration to create new principles or interpret the existing ones
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Olausson, Therese. "Offentlig upphandling : En kritisk studie av konkurrenspräglad dialog, dynamiskt inköpssystem och elektronisk auktion." Thesis, Linköping University, Department of Management and Economics, 2006. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-5893.

Full text
Abstract:

Regelverket för offentlig upphandling håller för närvarande på att förändras. Det är direktiven 2004/18/EG (klassiska direktivet) och 2004/17/EG (försörjningsdirektivet), som har omarbetats. Andledningen till en regelförändring är att omvärlden har förändrats, vilket innebär att tekniken har utvecklats och behoven för nya rutiner inom offentlig upphandling är nödvändiga. Bland de nyheter som återfinns i direktiven återfinns ett nytt upphandlingsförfarande, den så kallade konkurrenspräglade dialogen. Förfarandet är avsett att tillämpas vid situationer då det inte är möjligt att i de tekniska specifikationerna ange vad som krävs för att tillgodose den upphandlande myndighetens behov. Utöver denna nyhet, presenteras också en ny inköpsprocess, det så kallade dynamiska inköpssystemet. Det karaktäristiska för denna inköpsprocess är att den är helt elektronisk och skall möjliggöra ett stort urval för beställare att förfoga över. Slutligen är en ny form av tilldelning av kontrakt framtagen, den så kallade elektroniska auktionen. Detta senare förfarande är inte ett självständigt upphandlingsförfarande. Processen skall i det närmast ses som en fortsättning på öppet, selektivt och i vissa fall, förhandlat förfarande. Det handlar om tilldelning av kontrakt.

Aktörer inom offentlig upphandling står således inför nya utmaningar. Det är dock grundläggande att försäkra att viktiga principer inte förringas eller ignoreras vid införande och tillämpning av nya element i regelverket. De principer som avses är principen om likabehandling, principen om insyn och öppenhet, samt proportionalitetsprincipen.

Uppsatsen är en kritisk studie av konkurrenspräglad dialog, dynamiska inköpssystem och elektroniska auktioner. Hur verkar dessa element i förhållande till viktiga principer såsom, likabehandling, insyn och öppenhet och proportionalitetsprincipen?

I och med klarläggande hur dessa system är ämnade att fungera, uppkommer följande frågor;

Vilka möjligheter medför användandet av de nya elementen?

Vilka är de eventuella riskerna med de nya elementen i offentlig upphandling?

Studien visar att tillämpning konkurrenspräglad dialog

- förbättrar och höjer nivån av exakthet i förfrågningsunderlaget,

- ger upphov till osäkerhet om vad ett särskilt komplicerat kontrakt är,

- kan åsidosätta likabehandlingsprincipen

- hotar att utesluta små- och medelstora leverantörer.

Studien visar att tillämpning av dynamiska inköpssystem

- kommer att resultera i en ökad konkurrens, dock en blygsam ökning,

- öppenheten för nya aktörer kommer att gagnas,

- ökar antalet aktörer i upphandlingsprocessen och därmed också ökar den administrativa bördan,

- gynnar större leverantörer på grund av stordriftsfördelar,

- små- och medelstora företag kan komma att känna sig hämmade att delta i systemet.

Studien visar att tillämpning av elektroniska auktioner

- förenklar upphandlingsprocessen vid kontraktstilldelning och reducerar kostnader för både upphandlande enhet och leverantör,

- innebär ett riskmoment för bevarandet sekretess av vissa material.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Morin, Asli. "La convergence des jurisprudences de la Cour de cassation et du Conseil d'Etat : contribution au dialogue des juges en droit du travail." Thesis, Paris 2, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012PA020065.

Full text
Abstract:
La thèse étudie sous leurs aspects, historiques, juridiques, la convergence des jurisprudences du Conseil d’Etat et de la Cour de cassation en droit du travail. D’autres juridictions,nationales (Tribunal des conflits et Conseil constitutionnel), européennes (Cour européenne des droits de l’Homme et Cour de justice de l’Union européenne) concourent à ce rapprochement. La thèse aborde la convergence des objectifs sous deux angles ; l’un né d’une attraction réciproque, l’autre, d’une attraction amplifiée. La convergence jurisprudentielle est successivement qualifiée de « recherchée » et de « nuancée ». Le « juge répartiteur » exerce une influence indirecte, à laquelle s’ajoute celle, directe, des « juges prescripteurs ». A la convergence des objectifs s’ajoute une convergence de la méthode, perceptible à travers les modes d’articulation des sources et les techniques de construction jurisprudentielle. La thèse démontre que le droit du travail, qui s’est construit en réunissant les enseignements du droit civil – la force obligatoire du contrat – et les leçons du droit public – l’importance de l’intérêt général – se révèle être le domaine d’élection d’un échange technique inédit entre les deux ordres juridictionnels. Cette étude signale le passage d’une période d’indifférence mutuelle à celle d’une attention devenue traditionnelle. A l’instar du dialogue qui existe entre le juge et le législateur en matière sociale, se noue un « dialogue des juges » des deux Hautes Juridictions, pour prévenir des discordances majeures
This dissertation aims at describing how the two Supreme Institutions — the Board of State and the Court of Cassation —, despite their respective traditions and status were able to make their Jurisprudences convergent. Beginning with an historical Introduction, the study goes in details into the reciprocal attraction of the the Board of State and of the Court of Cassation based on shared goals (Part I). This convergent movement is discussed according to both Jurisprudences (Title 1), then in relation with the Jurisprudences of the Disputes Tribunal of the Constitutional Council and of the European Courts (Title 2). Part II offers a methodological approach explaining how the sources of these Jurisprudences are selected in order to solve normative conflicts (Title 1). A cross-movement consisting in loans and exchanges of technics between both Institutions occurs for the sake of Law unity and in defense of the public and individual Rights (Title 2)
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Caron, Slovia. "La cour de cassation et le dialogue des juges." Phd thesis, Université de Grenoble, 2011. http://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00769401.

Full text
Abstract:
Le dialogue des juges recouvre plusieurs réalités. L'aspect qui est étudié ici est le dialogue qui s'instaure entre la Cour de cassation et les autres juges : nationaux, européens, internationaux et étrangers. Ce dialogue se fait à travers la décision de justice, qui est désormais accessible et diffusée dans le monde entier grâce à internet et aux sites de la juridiction. Ce phénomène, appelé aussi " influence croisée des jurisprudences ", prend naissance avec l'expansion de la science comparative et commence à se manifester dans la jurisprudence de la Haute juridiction judiciaire. Encore en voie de développement, le dialogue des juges n'est pas sans produire certaines conséquences quant à la place de la Cour de cassation sur la scène nationale, mais aussi sur la scène internationale. Par ailleurs, il devrait se révéler prochainement comme un nouvel instrument au service des magistrats.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Van, Den Eynde Laura. "Interpreting Rights Collectively: Comparative Arguments in Public Interest Litigants’ Briefs on Fundamental Rights Issues." Doctoral thesis, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/2013/ULB-DIPOT:oai:dipot.ulb.ac.be:2013/217681.

Full text
Abstract:
This research explores the role of public interest litigants in the circulation of arguments among courts regarding the interpretation of fundamental rights. Such circulation is often labeled ‘judicial dialogue’. ‘Public interest litigants’ are here defined as entities (individuals or groups) with no direct interest in the case, who use procedural avenues to participate in the litigation. Despite extensive scholarly attention for judicial dialogue, the necessity for more empirical research devoted to the exchanges among jurisdictions had been stressed. Three jurisdictions with different postures towards cross-citations were chosen for the analysis: the U.S. Supreme Court, the European Court of Human Rights and the South African Constitutional Court. Among their vast case law, landmark cases were selected dealing firstly with death penalty or related questions and secondly with discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. Briefs submitted by public interest litigants to courts were collected and analyzed, mainly to inquire about the identity of the actors involved in the cases, to see whether their briefs contain comparative material and, if they do, to record what sort of references are made and whether they are accompanied by justifications supporting their relevance.The analysis reveals that the briefs contain comparative material. Many public interest litigants can be considered as messengers of this information. They push for the detachment of judicial interpretation from the text at hand and propose a variant of the interpretative exercise in which the mobilized material is not exclusively jurisdiction-bound. The cross-analysis also reveals that, contrary to the picture painted by the literature on the phenomenon, there are actually many comparisons in the broad sense (referring for example to a ‘universal practice’) that are used in a norm-centric way, that is, where the simple mention of a comparative element in the form of a broad reference or the outcome of a foreign case should have weight in the adjudication and not in a reason-centric way, that is, by exposing the reasoning of a foreign judge. The research also hypothesized that the comparative material brought by public interest litigants influences the judges. Analyzing the cases using the process-tracing method allowed to substantiate that briefs are read and established that several comparative references brought by public interest litigants were debated during the oral arguments and found an echo in the judgments (in majority and dissenting opinions). Along with the use of other methods such as interviews of judges, the hypothesis was thus confirmed.Exploring the roles of external actors also enables to supply the literature on judicial dialogue with factual insights regarding the identities of the actors behind the circulation of legal arguments. It was found that, in the United States, the traditional domestic ‘repeat players’ (that is, actors often involved in the litigation) do not clearly embrace a comparative approach while most public interest litigants in Europe and South Africa do. Similarly, the pregnant role of transnational actors is underlined. The analysis suggests an explanation drawn from an aspect of the legal culture in which the public interest litigants evolve and which influences their argumentative strategies: the horizon of the ambient rights discourse: a civil rights discourse, more territorially bounded (and more often found in the U.S. context), is distinguished from a human rights or fundamental rights discourse which entails a more cosmopolitan dimension.The final part of the research explores and discusses the justifications provided by public interest litigants to support the relevance of a comparative approach in the interpretation of rights. The compilation of these justifications allows to confront those provided first hand to the judges with those constructed post facto by the scholarly literature. It reveals the uncertain implications of some of these justifications, in particular the one pointing to the universal nature of the discussed rights and the one invoking the need for consistency among the approaches of jurisdictions.The research thus allows to confirm the hypothesis that public interest litigants play a key role in judicial dialogue. Moreover, it points at further promising researches, and this thesis hopes to draw the attention to often neglected elements, such as the identity and status of the actors bringing comparative information, the forms of citations and the roles assigned to them, the aspects of legal culture that are seldom mentioned in the literature and the implications of the justifications explicitly or implicitly provided for the relevance of comparative material.
Doctorat en Sciences juridiques
info:eu-repo/semantics/nonPublished
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Claeys-Broutin, Odile. "Le pluralisme juridique international : contribution des juges internationaux à la mise en cohérence du droit international." Thesis, Paris 10, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011PA100175.

Full text
Abstract:
Le droit international évolue et se traduit par une augmentation des normes, des organisations et des juridictions internationales, faisant craindre une fragmentation du droit international au sein de l’ordre juridique international. L’ordre juridique international s’entend, au sens large, comme le droit international régissant la société internationale. Celui-ci englobe les ordres juridiques internationaux spécialisés, composés des organisations internationales. Chacune d’entre elles comprend une juridiction ou un tribunal arbitral. La problématique de cette thèse est de déterminer, par l’étude du pluralisme juridique international, si ce risque de fragmentation du droit international est avéré ou non. Elle se fonde, pour ce faire, sur une analyse systémique des ordres juridiques internationaux, pour établir si ceux-ci établissent des rapports de droit entre eux, ainsi que sur une analyse normative des ordres juridiques, afin de déterminer si chacun d’entre eux a une cohérence propre. Dans une première partie, il est démontré que le pluralisme juridique international semble désordonné, induisant un risque de fragmentation du droit international, en raison, d’une part, de la multiplication des ordres juridiques internationaux et, d’autre part, de leur carence institutionnelle. Il est démontré ensuite, dans une seconde partie, que le pluralisme juridique international s’ordonne grâce à la mise en cohérence du droit international par les juges internationaux. Ceux-ci coordonnent la jurisprudence internationale grâce à leur jurisdictio (dire le droit) et érigent un véritable pouvoir juridictionnel international à travers leur imperium (rendre une décision obligatoire)
International law evolves at a rapid pace, and results in a strong increase in norms, organizations and international courts, raising increasing fears about a fragmentation of international law within the international legal order itself. The international legal order is defined, in the broadest sense of the term, as international law aimed at governing international society. This includes specialized international legal systems, made up of a number of international organizations ; each one including a court or an arbitral tribunal. The aim of this thesis is to determine, through the study of international legal pluralism, weather this foreseen risk of a possible fragmentation of the international law is, in the end, proven or not. In order to fulfill this aim, our work is based, on the one hand, on a systemic analysis of international legal orders, this in order to determine whether these bodies establish legal relationships between themselves, and on the other hand, on a normative analysis of legal systems, to determine this time whether each one sets up, or not, its proper inner coherence.In the first part, we show that the international legal pluralism seems to be uncoordinated, inducing a risk of fragmentation of international law, this due, in part, to the proliferation of international legal orders and, and in other part, to their lack of institutional ground. In the second part, we aim at proving that the international legal pluralism finds best its balance when international law is put into practice by international judges. They coordinate international jurisprudence through their jurisdictio (apply the law) and set out the boundaries of a true international judicial power through their imperium (to pronounce a binding decision)
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Dialogic jurisprudence"

1

The land is the source of the law: A dialogic encounter with indigenous jurisprudence. New York: Routledge, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Vittoria, Barsotti, Carozza Paolo G, Cartabia Marta, and Simoncini Andrea. II Constitutional Jurisprudence, 4 Key Rights and Freedoms. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780190214555.003.0004.

Full text
Abstract:
Every constitutional system today presents major controversies and encounters significant challenges in the protection and guarantees of fundamental rights, and for that reason they constitute the most lively subject of transnational constitutional dialogue. The Italian Constitutional Court has a highly developed body of jurisprudence on fundamental rights, starting with its very first decision examining the validity of Fascist laws limiting freedom of expression. This chapter provides a broad overview of some of the constitutional principles that ground fundamental rights in Italian constitutional law, such as human dignity and equality, and then presents the Court’s case law in a selected set of problem areas: personal liberty; freedom of religion; protection of the family; reproduction; social rights; immigration. These are areas with which many other constitutional systems are struggling, and the Italian Court’s particular way of conceptualizing and addressing these issues provides a welcome new voice in the global dialogue.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Vittoria, Barsotti, Carozza Paolo G, Cartabia Marta, and Simoncini Andrea. Italian Constitutional Justice in Global Context. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780190214555.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
This is the first book published in English to provide to an international audience a comprehensive examination of the Italian Constitutional Court (ItCC) and its principal lines of jurisprudence, historical origins, current engagement with transnational European law, organization, and procedures. In global constitutional dialogue, the voice of the ItCC has been entirely absent due to a relative lack of both English translations of its decisions and of focused scholarly commentary in English. The ItCC represents one of the strongest and most successful examples of constitutional judicial review, and is distinctive in its structure, institutional dimensions, and well-developed jurisprudence. Moreover, the ItCC has developed a unique voice among global constitutional actors in its adjudication of a broad range of topics from fundamental rights and liberties to the allocations of governmental power and regionalism. The goal of this book is to elevate Italian constitutional jurisprudence into an active participant role in global constitutional discourse and describe the “Italian style” in global constitutional adjudication. The authors have carefully structured the work to allow the ItCC’s own voice to emerge: it presents broad syntheses of major areas of the Court’s case law, provides excerpts from notable decisions in a narrative and analytical context, addresses the tension between the ItCC and the Court of Cassation, and situates the development, character, and importance of the ItCC’s jurisprudence in the larger arc of global judicial dialogue.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ziccardi Capaldo, Giuliana, ed. The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2018. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190072506.001.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
The 2018 edition of The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence both updates readers on the important work of long-standing international tribunals and introduces readers to more novel topics in international law. The Yearbook continues to provide expert coverage of the Court of Justice of the European Union and diverse tribunals from the International Court of Justice (ICJ) to criminal tribunals such as the International Criminal Court (ICC) and the Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, to economically based tribunals such as ICSID and the WTO Dispute settlement procedures. The contents of this part have been enriched with the inclusion of a new section devoted to the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA), the oldest global institution for the settlement of international disputes. This edition contains original research articles on the development and analysis of the concept of global law and the views of the global law theorists such as: whether the Paris Declaration of 2017 and the Oslo Recommendation of 2018 deals with enhancing their institutions’ legitimacy; how to reconcile human rights, trade law, intellectual property, investment and health law with the WTO dispute settlement panel upholding Australia’s tobacco plain packaging measure; Israel’s acceptance of Palestinian statehood contingent upon prior Palestinian “demilitarization” is potentially contrary to pertinent international law; and a proposal to strengthen cooperation between the ECJ and National Courts in light of the failure of the dialogue between the ECJ and the Italian Constitutional Court on the interpretation of Article 325 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European union. The Yearbook provides students, scholars, and practitioners alike a valuable combination of expert discussion and direct quotes from the court opinions to which that discussion relates, as well as an annual overview of the process of cross-fertilization between international courts and tribunals.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

(Editor), Mariano Plotkin, and Lyman L. Johnson (Series Editor), eds. Argentina on the Couch: Psychiatry, State, and Society, 1880 to the Present (Dialogos (Albuquerque, N.M.).). University of New Mexico Press, 2003.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

(Editor), Mariano Plotkin, and Lyman L. Johnson (Series Editor), eds. Argentina on the Couch: Psychiatry, State, and Society, 1880 to the Present (Dialogos (Albuquerque, N.M.).). University of New Mexico Press, 2003.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Pellet, Alain. Should We (Still) Worry about Fragmentation? Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198816423.003.0012.

Full text
Abstract:
Alain Pellet argues that we should not worry about fragmentation, given the multiplicity of international courts. To the contrary, he defends the dialogue among the many courts as contributing to the responsible development of international law. He responds to several criticisms concerning possible interpretative fragmentation; competing jurisdiction and forum shopping; as well as regional courts as a potential challenge to the global rule of law, holding that whilst fragmentation might be a problem in theory, it hardly ever occurs in practice. Pellet concludes that the several international courts are not a threat, but an enrichment of international jurisprudence.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Lavanya, Rajamani. Part II Negotiating Constitutionalism, Ch.9 International Law and the Constitutional Schema. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198704898.003.0009.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter examines the Indian constitutional scheme with regard to international law. It begins with an overview of the doctrinal debates surrounding key constitutional provisions relating to international law, with particular emphasis on Article 51(c) of the Indian Constitution. It then considers how Indian courts have viewed norms of international law with respect to the constitutional guidance to ‘foster respect for international law and treaty obligations’, along with the courts’ development of domestic rights jurisprudence in dialogue with international law. It also explores how the constitutional schema has become an instrument for a usurpation of power by the executive and the judiciary, while limiting the role of Parliament and ‘people power’ in relation to international law.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Stirn, Bernard. The Independence and Interdependence of Judges. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198789505.003.0005.

Full text
Abstract:
Chapter 5 analyses the independence and impartiality of Europe’s judge; but it does so under the heading ‘independence within interdependence’. By doing so, it brings out the various ways in which the judges of Europe refer to each other and endeavour to learn from each other’s jurisprudence. The chapter sets out this dual quality of independence and interdependence by, first, analysing the development of constitutional adjudication in Europe; then, second, the evolution of reinforcement of judicial control with the executive; thirdly, it looks at the right to an effective remedy before an independent and impartial tribunal—in relation to all these developments the chapter sets out and analyses the co-operation and dialogue which is taking place between the courts of Europe.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Trencsényi, Balázs, Michal Kopeček, Luka Lisjak Gabrijelčič, Maria Falina, Mónika Baár, and Maciej Janowski. Late State Socialism: Consolidation, Legitimization, and Reform from Above. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198829607.003.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
Seeking to consolidate the state socialist framework of government, individual regimes developed, in dialogue with social scientific research, peculiar disciplines of state socialist governance and authoritarian socio-technics. With the help of political economy, socialist jurisprudence, political sociology, or “prognostics,” late socialist regimes tried hard to stabilize their rule. At the same time, knowledge production catalyzed from above gave rise to a critical potential that caused a majority of the experts to endorse wholeheartedly first perestroika and glasnost coming from the Soviet Union and later also the radical break with the state socialist political system. Another effort to boost the failing legitimacy of the regime was a reconfiguration of national communism. Whereas the earlier, “liberalizing” variant was turning to the liberal nationalist tradition for inspiration, linking the cause of individual and national liberty, the later, “homogenizing” version drew more on the romantic nationalist identification of the ethnic Other as the oppressor.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Dialogic jurisprudence"

1

Farrelly, Colin. "Civic Liberalism and the “Dialogical Model” of Judicial Review." In Virtue Jurisprudence, 107–41. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-60073-1_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Tucker, Aviezer. "The Generation of Probable Facts from Testimonies in Jurisprudence and Historiography." In A Dialogue Between Law and History, 81–96. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-9685-8_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Martínez-Cazalla, M. Dolors, Tania Menéndez-Martín, and Shahid Rahman. "Parallel Reasoning by Ratio Legis in Contemporary Jurisprudence. Elements for a Dialogical Approach." In Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 163–87. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61438-6_9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Sweet, Alec Stone, and Jud Mathews. "Constitutional Dialogues." In Proportionality Balancing and Constitutional Governance, 127–61. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198841395.003.0005.

Full text
Abstract:
Apex courts face a fundamental problem: they cannot succeed in building systematic effectiveness in the face of regular opposition from the other branches of government, but they must sometimes invalidate the acts of those institutions to make rights effective. Chapter 5 considers how a court can build effectiveness while inducing inter-branch cooperation. A key is proportionality, which provides an infrastructure for the construction of dialogic jurisprudence. Constitutional courts delineate “zones of proportionality” within which policymakers enjoy meaningful policy discretion, albeit within guidelines set by the court. The chapter considers how rights-based, constitutional dialogues play out in three contexts, with respect: to legislating, making and enforcement of administrative law, and in the adjudication of private law disputes. These dialogues not only serve to secure other institutions’ acquiescence to the court’s jurisprudence, but drive proportionality reasoning into their decision-making routines, and hence into the legal domains over which they preside.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Capaldo, Giuliana Ziccardi. "Towards a “Judicial Knowledge-Sharing Dialogue”—A Methodological Pilot Project to Interpret and Disseminate Global Law." In The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2019, 13–24. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197513552.003.0002.

Full text
Abstract:
Judicial dialogue has to be improved because of the continuous globalization and because constitutional principles formulated on the global level are often unknown to national judges. The author presents an alternative proposal to the traditional model(s) of dialogue between courts that she calls “judicial knowledge-sharing dialogue.” The chapter explains how, in order to better understand the complex nature of the global law system and disseminate information and content, international courts should attain a genuine dialogue with domestic courts as a way to interpret and share knowledge of global principles. This chapter launches a pilot project for a judicial knowledge-sharing process inspired by basic principles and concepts of knowledge management, based on a combination of three crucial activities: interpreted information—knowledge dissemination—effective action. It argues that a sharing knowledge through dialogue is a better tool for courts working together to develop a truly universal constitutional structure of the global community, for the purpose of strengthening the protection of fundamental rights and commons.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Ziccardi Capaldo, Giuliana. "The Taricco Affair." In The Global Community Yearbook of International Law and Jurisprudence 2018, 3–18. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190072506.003.0001.

Full text
Abstract:
The author addresses “the dialogue between the deaf and the dumb” that occurred between the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and the Italian Constitutional Court (ItCC) regarding the Taricco affair. At the request of the Italian courts, the ECJ has ruled on the interpretation of Article 235 TFEU in the fight against VAT fraud (“Taricco rule”) in two judgments which, despite some shortcomings in their implementation, are innovative, i.e., based on new principles of global law that provide effective judicial protection of economic and social human rights. The author notes the failure of the dialogue between the ItCC (“deaf”)—which has blocked the door to the Taricco rule by virtue of being unable to grasp the novelty of the two judgments—and the ECJ (“dumb”)—incapable of interpreting and disseminating global law. This article identifies the path to a constructive dialogue in what the author calls a “knowledge dialogue,” suitable to create a shared understanding of global principles for a uniform system of protection of fundamental rights.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

"Judicial Dialogue and the Definition of Torture: The Importation of ICTs from European Jurisprudence." In Judicial Dialogue on Human Rights, 184–202. Brill | Nijhoff, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004313750_012.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

"Self- or Cross-fertilisation? Referencing ECtHR Jurisprudence to Justify Victim Participation at the ICC." In Judicial Dialogue on Human Rights, 282–99. Brill | Nijhoff, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004313750_017.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

"Beyond Anecdotal Reference: A Quantitative Assessment of ICTY References to the Jurisprudence of the ECtHR." In Judicial Dialogue on Human Rights, 109–28. Brill | Nijhoff, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004313750_008.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Allard, Julie, and Van&#;den&#;Eynde. "Section 6. Le dialogue des jurisprudences comme source du droit." In Les sources du droit revisitées - vol. 3, 285–315. Presses de l'Université Saint-Louis, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/books.pusl.2190.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Dialogic jurisprudence' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography