Academic literature on the topic 'Demonstration panel'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Demonstration panel.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Demonstration panel"
Frank C. Fan, Frank C. Fan, Sam Choi Sam Choi, and and C. C. Jiang and C. C. Jiang. "Demonstration of full-parallax three-dimensional holographic display on commercial 4 K flat-panel displayer." Chinese Optics Letters 14, no. 1 (2016): 010007–10011. http://dx.doi.org/10.3788/col201614.010007.
Full textLAMIC, Elise, Nicolas FLEURISSON, Fabien NAZARET, Jean-Pierre BONNAFÉ, Ludovic ROPARS, and Alexandre COLLOT. "DEMONSTRATION OF THE APPLICATION OF SUPERPLASTIC FORMING USING INFRARED HEATING EMITTERS TO A PART OF STRUCTURE INCLUDING VARIOUS GEOMETRICAL SINGULARITIES." MATEC Web of Conferences 321 (2020): 04023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202032104023.
Full textPiquette, Jean C. "Analytical backplate removal in panel tests: An experimental demonstration." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97, no. 3 (March 1995): 1978–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.413049.
Full textSugawara, Yoshiki, Hironori Sahara, Shinichi Nakasuka, Stephen Greenland, Takeshi Morimoto, Kanichi Koyama, Chisato Kobayashi, Hideaki Kikuchi, Takanori Okada, and Hidenori Tanaka. "A satellite for demonstration of Panel Extension Satellite (PETSAT)." Acta Astronautica 63, no. 1-4 (July 2008): 228–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2007.12.016.
Full textPark, Malcolm. "Brunelleschi's Discovery of Perspective's “Rule”." Leonardo 46, no. 3 (June 2013): 259–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_00566.
Full textCarrera, Arnau, Narcís Palomeras, Natàlia Hurtós, and Marc Carreras. "Free-floating panel intervention by means of Learning by Demonstration★." IFAC-PapersOnLine 48, no. 2 (2015): 38–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.007.
Full textBhattarai, Shankar, Ji-Seong Go, Hongrae Kim, and Hyun-Ung Oh. "Development of a Novel Deployable Solar Panel and Mechanism for 6U CubeSat of STEP Cube Lab-II." Aerospace 8, no. 3 (March 5, 2021): 64. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/aerospace8030064.
Full textZhao, Honggang, Qiquan Zheng, Yang Wang, Junhui Cao, Chao Wang, and Jihong Wen. "Acoustic absorption of a metamaterial panel: Mechanism, boundary effect and experimental demonstration." Applied Acoustics 184 (December 2021): 108369. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2021.108369.
Full textvan Goor, H., G. Harms, P. O. Gerrits, F. G. Kroese, S. Poppema, and J. Grond. "Immunohistochemical antigen demonstration in plastic-embedded lymphoid tissue." Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry 36, no. 1 (January 1988): 115–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/36.1.3275710.
Full textOxley, Les, and Peter C. B. Phillips. "MEETING OF THE NEW ZEALAND ECONOMETRIC STUDY GROUP (NZESG)." Econometric Theory 16, no. 2 (April 2000): 283–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266466600162097.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Demonstration panel"
Khanna, Amit. "Development and Demonstration of a Performance Test Protocol For Radiant Floor Heating Systems." Thesis, Virginia Tech, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/30987.
Full textMaster of Science
Mitrenga, Michal. "Realizace demonstrativního panelu inteligentní elektroinstalace KNX." Master's thesis, Vysoké učení technické v Brně. Fakulta elektrotechniky a komunikačních technologií, 2021. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-442454.
Full textChen, Qiao. "Modeling, design and demonstration of through-package-vias in panel-based polycrystalline silicon interposers for high performance, high reliability and low cost." Diss., Georgia Institute of Technology, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/1853/53568.
Full textJesus, Douglas Lisboa Santos de. "O papel demonstrativo dos diagramas na geometria euclidiana." Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, 2017. http://repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/24921.
Full textApproved for entry into archive by Biblioteca Isaías Alves (reposiufbat@hotmail.com) on 2018-01-08T13:01:12Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 De Jesus (2017) - O papel demonstrativo dos diagramas na geometria euclidiana (Dissertação).pdf: 1380214 bytes, checksum: c54e315d51423c3db9da71096989f547 (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2018-01-08T13:01:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 De Jesus (2017) - O papel demonstrativo dos diagramas na geometria euclidiana (Dissertação).pdf: 1380214 bytes, checksum: c54e315d51423c3db9da71096989f547 (MD5)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
A recente literatura em historiografia e filosofia da prática matemática apresenta um novo cenário sobre o estatuto epistemológico dos diagramas. Resgatam-se aí algumas das principais discussões sobre a maneira como um sujeito pode obter conhecimento através de justificativas diagramáticas. Dentro deste quadro intelectual, apresenta-se nesta investigação uma defesa dum modelo de prova matemática parcialmente baseado em diagramas. Como caso de estudo paradigmático, adota-se aqui os Elementos de Euclides sob a perspectiva metodológica da análise retórica. O principal argumento apresentado pretende demonstrar a seguinte tese: uma correta análise das provas euclidianas deve reconsiderar a prática matemática prescrita pelos Elementos num modelo de justificativa que incorpore não apenas a análise lógica de estruturas dedutivas, como também sua dimensão normativa, dependente, portanto, da audiência. Uma objeção frequente às provas euclidianas decorre da correta observação que o diagrama é uma instância física imperfeita, donde se seguiria que também uma prova diagramática é, de um ponto de vista lógico, imperfeita. É comum entre comentadores e filósofos a alegação de que as provas euclidianas possuem “lacunas” inferenciais, cuja correção deveria ser feita mediante novos axiomas dentro duma concepção formal de prova. Assim, cada passo em uma prova seria autorizado se, e somente se, é uma fórmula bem formada que, ou é um axioma, ou segue-se da aplicação duma regra de inferência. Em réplica, fica demonstrado que a principal deficiência deste argumento reside numa significativa negligência da prática matemática euclidiana. Mais ainda: não oferece uma explicação satisfatória para a estabilidade da teoria engendrada pelos Elementos. Isso é verificado a partir dum estudo mais detalhado acerca do Postulado 2. Através duma aclaração sobre o seu suposto uso não uniforme nos Livros I-VI pode-se constatar que a geometria euclidiana, no tocante às suas provas, é estável e racionalmente controlada. Para além da geometria de Euclides, mostra-se como a análise retórica poderia ser pensada como um método investigativo na filosofia da ciência.
The recent literature on historiography and philosophy of mathematical practice presents a new scenario about the epistemological status of diagrams. Some of the main discussions about the way a subject can obtain knowledge through diagrammatic justifications are rescued. Within this intellectual framework, it is presented here a defense of a mathematical proof model partially based on diagrams. As a paradigmatic case study, Euclid’s Elements are adopted here from the methodological perspective of the rhetorical analysis. The main argument through this text tries to prove the follow thesis: a correct analysis of the Euclidean proofs should reconsider the mathematical practice prescribed by the Elements in a justification model that incorporates not only the logical analysis of deductive structures, but also their normative dimension, therefore, dependent on the audience. A frequent objection to the Euclidean proofs stems from the correct observation that the diagram is an imperfect physical instance, from which it would follow that a diagrammatic proof, from a logical point of view, is also imperfect. It is common among commentators and philosophers the claim that the Euclidean proofs have inferential “gaps”, which should be corrected by new axioms within a formal conception of proof. Thus, each step in a proof would be allowed if, and only if, it is a well-formed formula which is either an axiom or follows from the application of an inference rule. In reply, it is demonstrated that the main deficiency of this argument lies in a significant neglect of Euclidean mathematical practice. Moreover, it does not offer a satisfactory explanation for the stability of the theory engendered by Elements. This is verified from a more detailed study of Postulate 2. Through a clarification on its supposed non-uniform use in Books I-VI it can be seen that Euclidean geometry, in relation to its proofs, is stable and rationally controlled. Beyond the geometry of Euclid, it is shown how rhetorical analysis could be thought of as an investigative method in the philosophy of science.
Lima, Marcella Luanna da Silva. "Sobre pensamento geomátrico, provas e demonstrações matemáticas de alunos do 2º ano do Ensino Médio nos ambientes Lápis e Papel e Geogebra." Universidade Estadual da Paraíba, 2015. http://tede.bc.uepb.edu.br/tede/jspui/handle/tede/2336.
Full textApproved for entry into archive by Secta BC (secta.csu.bc@uepb.edu.br) on 2016-07-21T20:47:00Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 PDF - Marcella Luanna da Silva Lima.pdf: 5051111 bytes, checksum: 2d6c0143b6e358e6f301609c3154d1f0 (MD5)
Approved for entry into archive by Secta BC (secta.csu.bc@uepb.edu.br) on 2016-07-21T20:47:11Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 PDF - Marcella Luanna da Silva Lima.pdf: 5051111 bytes, checksum: 2d6c0143b6e358e6f301609c3154d1f0 (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-07-21T20:47:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 PDF - Marcella Luanna da Silva Lima.pdf: 5051111 bytes, checksum: 2d6c0143b6e358e6f301609c3154d1f0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-12-21
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES
Our research work aimed to investigate what type of proof, mathematical demonstration and level of geometrical thinking can occur from a didactic proposal within pencil, paper and GeoGebra environments. As qualitative research and study case, we used as instruments essays with Mathematical Proof and Demonstration themes, a didactic proposal developed by a team of five people who inserted worked collaboratively in the CAPES/OBEDUC/UFMS/UEPB/UFAL Project, field notes, participant observation, audios and photos. We elaborated a didactic proposal with eighteen activities, divided into four parts, which encouraged the students to reflect, justify, prove and demonstrate. The proposal application was carried out in July 2015 with High School 2nd year students of a public school in the town of Areia, Paraíba. For such, the students organized themselves in couples and one trio and the data collection happened in three moments. In the first moment we applied the essay, revised angles, triangles and theorems with the students and worked GeoGebra application with them. In the second moment we applied Parts I and II of the proposal with eight activities on Pythagoras Theorem and three activities on Sum of the Internal Angles of a Triangle Theorem, respectively. In the third moment we applied Part III, with two questions on External Angle Theorem and Part IV, with five question to be worked with the GeoGebra application on Pythagoras Theorem and Sum of the Internal Angles of a Triangle Theorem. In our research work we analyzed the work developed by the trio of students, once they were great in responding all the questions/activities. We analyzed Activity 8 of Part I, Activity 1 and 2 of Part II and all Activities of Part IV, totalizing in eight questions. We used the triangulation method for our study case and, firstly, we traced the profiles of the trio in relation to Mathematical Proof and Demonstration. Then we investigated the geometric thinking and the mathematical proof and demonstration used by the trio of students in the pencil and paper and GeoGebra environments. For such, we used discussions around the level of geometrical thinking proposed by Parzysz (2006) and the type of proofs proposed by Balacheff (2000) and Nasser and Tinoco (2003). From our research results we could conclude that the trio of students could not develop the justifications or proofs, once they did not understand what are mathematical proof and demonstration are, in their essays they understand mathematical proofs as bimestrial evaluations applied by the mathematics teacher. Moreover, the mathematical proofs performed by these students were in accordance with naive empiricism, pragmatic proof (Balacheff, 2000) and graphic justification (Nassar and Tinoco, 2003). In this way, when we observed the students geometrical thinking (Parzysz, 2006) we noted that it fits into two levels of the non-axiomatic Geometry: the Concrete Geomety (G0) and the Spatio-Graphique Geometry (G1), once these students used drawings to justify their affirmations, as the validation of the affirmation was done by the trio. We believe that if in Mathematic classes the teachers contemplate mathematical proof and demonstration, respecting the level of education, the degree of knowledge and maturity of the students, they could strongly contribute to the process of teaching and learning Mathematics and geometrical thinking, once the students would be led to reflect, justify, prove and demonstrate their ideas.
Nossa pesquisa investigou que tipo de provas, demonstrações matemáticas e nível de pensamento geométrico de alunos do 2º Ano do Ensino Médio podem ocorrer a partir de uma proposta didática nos ambientes lápis e papel e GeoGebra. Como pesquisa qualitativa, e estudo de caso, utilizamos como instrumentos redação com o tema Provas e Demonstrações Matemáticas, proposta didática desenvolvida por uma equipe de cinco pessoas que trabalhou de forma colaborativa inserida no Projeto CAPES/OBEDUC/UFMS/UEPB/UFAL Edital 2012, notas de campo, observação participante, gravações em áudio e fotos. Elaboramos uma proposta didática com 18 atividades, dividida em quatro partes, que incentivam alunos a refletirem, justificarem, provarem e demonstrarem. A aplicação dessa proposta se deu em julho de 2015 aos alunos do 2º Ano do Ensino Médio de uma escola pública na cidade de Areia, Paraíba. Para isso, os alunos se agruparam em duplas e um trio e a coleta dos dados se deu em três momentos. No primeiro momento, aplicamos a redação, revisamos com os alunos ângulos, triângulos e teoremas e trabalhamos com eles o aplicativo GeoGebra. No segundo momento, aplicamos as Partes I e II da proposta com 8 atividades sobre Teorema de Pitágoras e 3 atividades sobre Teorema da Soma dos Ângulos Internos de um Triângulo, respectivamente. No terceiro momento, aplicamos a Parte III, com 2 questões sobre o Teorema do Ângulo Externo e a Parte IV, com 5 questões à serem trabalhadas no aplicativo GeoGebra sobre o Teorema de Pitágoras e Teorema da Soma dos Ângulos Internos de um Triângulo. Em nossa pesquisa analisamos o trabalho desenvolvido pelo trio de alunos, uma vez que foram ricos na tentativa de r esponder a todas as perguntas/atividades. Analisamos a Atividade 8 da Parte I, as Atividades 1 e 2 da Parte II e todas as Atividades da Parte IV, totalizando em 8 questões. Utilizamos o método de triangulação de dados para nosso estudo de caso e, primeiramente, traçamos o perfil do trio de alunos com relação às Provas e Demonstrações Matemáticas. Em seguida, investigamos o pensamento geométrico e as provas e demonstrações matemáticas utilizadas pelo trio de alunos nos ambientes lápis e papel e GeoGebra. Para isso, utilizamos as discussões sobre os níveis do pensamento geométrico propostos por Parzysz (2006) e tipos de provas propostos por Balacheff (2000) e Nasser e Tinoco (2003). A partir de nossos resultados pudemos concluir que o trio de alunos não conseguiu desenvolver suas justificativas nem provas, uma vez que não entendem o que vem a ser provas e demonstrações matemáticas, e em suas redações percebemos que estes alunos tratam provas matemáticas como as avaliações aplicadas bimestralmente pelo professor de Matemática. Além disso, as provas matemáticas realizadas por estes alunos se enquadram no empirismo ingênuo, prova pragmática (Balacheff, 2000) e justificativa gráfica (Nasser e Tinoco, 2003). Dessa forma, quando observamos o pensamento geométrico (Parzysz, 2006) destes alunos, notamos que se enquadra nos dois níveis da Geometria não axiomática: a Geometria Concreta (G0) e a Geometria Spatio-Graphique (G1), uma vez que estes alunos se utilizam de desenhos para justificar suas afirmações, como também a validação das afirmações foi feita pela percepção do trio. Acreditamos que se nas aulas de Matemática os professores contemplassem provas e demonstrações matemáticas, respeitando o nível de escolaridade, o grau de conhecimento e a maturidade dos alunos, contribuiriam fortemente para o processo de ensino e aprendizagem da Matemática e do pensamento geométrico, uma vez que os alunos seriam levados a refletir, justificar, provar e demonstrar suas ideias.
Alves, Luís Filipe Carneiro Gomes. "O papel da exemplificação instrumental pelo professor nas aulas de oboé." Master's thesis, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/1822/45179.
Full textO presente relatório dimana do Estágio Profissional realizado no Conservatório de Música Calouste Gulbenkian de Braga, no âmbito do Mestrado em Ensino de Música da Universidade do Minho, e explana a conceção, o desenvolvimento e a avaliação do Plano de Intervenção, implementado ao longo do ano letivo 2015/2016. A nível empírico verifica-se que a exemplificação instrumental é amplamente utilizada pelos professores de instrumento e exibe elevado estatuto face a outras estratégias didáticas utilizadas no ensino especializado de música. Todavia, poucos estudos exploram a sua aplicação e o seu papel concreto na aprendizagem de um instrumento musical. Assim, a estruturação deste projeto de intervenção e investigação pretendeu verificar o potencial didático da exemplificação instrumental pelo professor nas aulas de Oboé, tendo em conta variáveis como: graus de ensino, repertório e conteúdos programáticos. Neste sentido, foi realizada uma investigação-ação envolvendo alunos do 1º e 2º ciclos e do Ensino Secundário. Os dados obtidos foram recolhidos através dos registos de observação, narrativas profissionais e de aprendizagem, focus group e inquérito por questionário. A partir dos resultados obtidos conclui-se que a exemplificação instrumental é uma estratégia didática eficiente e transversal a todos os graus de ensino implicados no estudo, ainda que se tenha constatado a necessidade de utilização mais frequente e de mais tipos de exemplificação em graus mais avançados, sobretudo nos “estudos” e “peças”, uma vez que nos graus iniciais há, por tradição, maior preocupação com a leitura e não com o som, o que origina mais explicações verbais. Os elementos-chave desta estratégia parecem estar relacionados com a modelação/imitação e com a motivação. Não obstante, devido à dimensão particular do contexto educativo onde se realizou o estágio e ao número diminuto de intervenientes no estudo, parece importante contextualizar os resultados obtidos e, se possível, aprofundar a investigação realizada através de novos estudos comparativos e longitudinais.
The current report describes the conception, development and evaluation of a Pedagogical Intervention Plan implemented at Calouste Gulbenkian Music Conservatory of Braga throughout the Academic Year of 2015-2016 as part of the Practicum of the Master’s degree in Music Education of the University of Minho. From an empirical point of view, teacher’s demonstrations in instrumental lessons enjoy a privileged status as they have been widely adopted in detriment of other strategies in specialized music education. Despite the evident preference for this method, there are very few studies exploring both its clear role and actual implementation in the process of teaching a musical instrument. The awareness of this lack draw, indeed, the need to structure this research and pedagogical project in a way which might check the true potential of the music instrument demonstration by the teacher in Oboe lessons. For this purpose several variables were studied: level of knowledge, repertoire and syllabi. Having this in mind, an action research project took place, involving students of the 1st and 2nd cycles and of the Secondary level. Data has been collected through observation of Pedagogical Practice, learning narratives, professional narratives, focus group, and a questionnaire. The results obtained show that music demonstration in instrumental lessons is an efficient and transversal didactic strategy for students of all levels involved in the project. Despite its effectiveness on all student levels, it became clear that demonstrations are more frequent in more advanced degrees and mostly used in “studies” and “pieces”. This can be easily understood if we consider that in the early stages of music education, the focus usually lies more on reading rather than on sound, which explains a more theoretical or verbal approach by the teacher. The key-elements of this strategy seem to be linked to modeling/imitation as well as to motivation; despite this - and due to both the peculiar dimension of the educational context where the practicum took place and the not so abundant number of participants in the study – further study and interpretation of the results as well as comparative and longitudinal research are needed.
Books on the topic "Demonstration panel"
Center, Langley Research, ed. High capacity demonstration of honeycomb panel heat pipes. Hampton, Va: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, 1989.
Find full textCenter, Langley Research, ed. High capacity demonstration of honecomb panel heat pipes. Hampton, Va: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, 1989.
Find full textWauters, W. Manufacture of a Sound and Heat Insulating Panel by Using Regenerated Raw Materials: Demonstration Project. European Communities / Union (EUR-OP/OOPEC/OPOCE), 1989.
Find full textNew York State Energy Research and Development Authority., Geneva (N.Y.). Marsh Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant., Parkson Corporation, and O'Brien & Gere., eds. Demonstration of membrane aeration panels: City of Geneva Wastewater Treatment Plant : final report. Albany: The Authority, 1995.
Find full textJones, Sam, and Ricardo Santos. Updating great expectations: The effect of peer salary information on own-earnings forecasts. UNU-WIDER, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.35188/unu-wider/2020/895-5.
Full textGelfand, Michele J., Chi-yue Chiu, and Ying-yi Hong, eds. Handbook of Advances in Culture and Psychology, Volume 7. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190879228.001.0001.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Demonstration panel"
Langdon, Jonathan. "An unfractured line: an academic tale of self-reflective social movement learning in the Nova Scotia anti-fracking movement." In Environmental Justice, Popular Struggle and Community Development, 83–100. Policy Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447350835.003.0006.
Full textBaker, Andy, Barry Ames, and Lúcio Rennó. "Clientelism as the Purchase of Social Influence." In Persuasive Peers, 187–206. Princeton University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691205779.003.0007.
Full textQian, Yingyi. "Regional Decentralization and Fiscal Incentives: Federalism, Chinese Style." In How Reform Worked in China. The MIT Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262534246.003.0010.
Full textRakow, Donald A., Meghan Z. Gough, and Sharon A. Lee. "A Look at the Future of Public Gardens." In Public Gardens and Livable Cities, 156–60. Cornell University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501702594.003.0008.
Full textFox, Michael H. "Global Climate Change: Real or Myth?" In Why We Need Nuclear Power. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199344574.003.0006.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Demonstration panel"
Tanzer, H. J., M. R. Cerza, and J. B. Hall. "High Capacity Demonstration of Honeycomb Panel Heat Pipes." In SAE Aerospace Technology Conference and Exposition. 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA, United States: SAE International, 1986. http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/861833.
Full textDanko, Matus, Michal Taraba, Juraj Adamec, Branislav Hanko, and Peter Drgona. "CAN BUS demonstration panel and its visualization using modular instrumentation." In 2018 ELEKTRO. IEEE, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/elektro.2018.8398281.
Full textKim, Dowan, Seokbong Park, Mina Heo, Daeyeon Choi, and Hyunchul Jung. "Demonstration of Fine Pitch RDL in Fanout Panel Level Packaging." In 2021 IEEE 71st Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC). IEEE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ectc32696.2021.00175.
Full textShimomura, Yutaro, Takuya Shimada, Ryuya Kirihara, and Takeshi Kumaki. "Live Demonstration: Development of LED-Based Stego-Panel for New Smartphone Usage." In 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS). IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iscas45731.2020.9181264.
Full textKirstein, Franziska, Kerstin Fischer, and Dorthe Sølvason. "Human embodiment creates problems for robot learning by demonstration using a control panel." In HRI'14: ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2559636.2563713.
Full textShaw, C. C., Lingyun Chen, M. C. Altunbas, Shuju Tu, Tian-Peng Wang, Chao-Jen Lai, S. C. Kappadath, Yang Meng, and Xinming Liu. "Cone Beam Breast CT with a Flat Panel Detector- Simulation, Implementation and Demonstration." In 2005 27th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iembs.2005.1615457.
Full textPark, Junho, and Wonbin Hong. "Optically Invisible Touch Sensor Panel Integrated Antenna: Concept and Demonstration at mmWave Spectrum." In 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and North American Radio Science Meeting. IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ieeeconf35879.2020.9329474.
Full textLu, Hao, Yutaka Takagi, Yuya Suzuki, Brett Sawyer, Robin Taylor, Venky Sundaram, and Rao Tummala. "Demonstration of 3–5 μm RDL line lithography on panel-based glass interposers." In 2014 IEEE 64th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ectc.2014.6897479.
Full textBuch, Chintan, Daniel Struk, Klaus-Jurgen Wolter, Peter J. Hesketh, Venky Sundaram, Rao Tummala, Catherine Shearer, James Haley, Mel Findlay, and Marc Papageorge. "Design and Demonstration of Highly Miniaturized, Low Cost Panel Level Glass Package for MEMS Sensors." In 2017 IEEE 67th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC). IEEE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ectc.2017.283.
Full textLee, Theresa M., Susan E. Hartfield-Wünsch, and Siguang Xu. "Demonstration of the Preform Anneal Process to Form a One-Piece Aluminum Door Inner Panel." In SAE 2006 World Congress & Exhibition. 400 Commonwealth Drive, Warrendale, PA, United States: SAE International, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.4271/2006-01-0987.
Full textReports on the topic "Demonstration panel"
McCarthy, A. Demonstration model circuit panel for silicon-on-insulator microelectronics and flat-panel 1994 LDRD final report 94-FS-041. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), September 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/120880.
Full textKung, S. C., and R. J. Kleisley. Full-scale demonstration of low-NO{sub x} cell{trademark} burner retrofit: Addendum to long-term testing report, September 1994 outage: Examination of corrosion test panel and UT survey in DP&L Unit {number_sign}4. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), June 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/367096.
Full textAlan E. Bland. Ash-Based Building Panels Production and Demonstration of Aerock Decking Building Product. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), June 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/910142.
Full textMATERIALS SYSTEMS INC CONCORD MA. Manufacturing Demonstration Of Large 1-3 Piezoelectric Ceramic/Polymer Composite Panels Using Ceramic Injection Molding. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, September 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada294555.
Full textRichman, Eric E. New Technology Demonstration Program - Results of an Attempted Field Test of Multi-Layer Light Polarizing Panels in an Office Space. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), June 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/965725.
Full textRichman, Eric E. New Technology Demonstration Program - Results of an Attempted Field Test of Multi-Layer Light Polarizing Panels in an Office Space. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), June 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/782080.
Full textDemonstration of membrane aeration panels: City of Geneva Wastewater Treatment Plant. Final report. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/26393.
Full text