Relevant bibliographies by topics / Deliberative processes

Academic literature on the topic 'Deliberative processes'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 19 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Contents

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Deliberative processes.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Deliberative processes"

1

Martínez-Bascuñán, Máriam. "Misgivings on Deliberative Democracy: Revisiting the Deliberative Framework." World Political Science 12, no. 2 (November 1, 2016): 195–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/wps-2016-0006.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractIn the last few years, the Deliberative Framework has become the main model in the consolidation of democratic processes. Deliberative theorists argue that deliberation helps to promote the democratic level of our societies, and they have good reasons to support this view. This article, however, is critical with some of these claims, questioning the widespread assumption of an existing connection between deliberation and democracy. With this objective in mind, we will examine the following three questions: Who deliberates? Under what conditions does deliberation take place? What is the content of deliberation? Once the potential repressive components of deliberation are made clear, we try to reach some normative considerations regarding how to promote certain mechanisms of deliberation that are in fact more in line with deliberative emancipation ideas and, as such, better assertions for promoting democracy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Fishkin, James S. "DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY AND CONSTITUTIONS." Social Philosophy and Policy 28, no. 1 (November 30, 2010): 242–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0265052510000129.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThis paper examines the potential role of deliberative democracy in constitutional processes of higher law-making, either for the founding of constitutions or for constitutional change. It defines deliberative democracy as the combination of political equality and deliberation and situates this form of democracy in contrast to a range of alternatives. It then considers two contrasting processes—elite deliberation and plebiscitary mass democracy (embodied in referenda) as approaches to higher law-making that employ deliberation without political equality or political equality without deliberation. It finally turns to some institutional designs that might achieve both fundamental values at the same time, or in the process of realizing a sequence of choices.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Doyle, Oran, and Rachael Walsh. "Deliberation in Constitutional Amendment: Reappraising Ireland’s Deliberative Mini-Publics." European Constitutional Law Review 16, no. 3 (September 2020): 440–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1574019620000243.

Full text
Abstract:
Deliberative democracy innovations in constitutional amendment processes – Ireland’s experimentation with deliberative mini-publics on constitutional issues – Factors influencing the political take-up of recommendations – The significance of the support of the legislative majority –Deliberative mini-publics as an accountability mechanism.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

O'DOHERTY, KIERAN C., and HELEN J. DAVIDSON. "Subject Positioning and Deliberative Democracy: Understanding Social Processes Underlying Deliberation." Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 40, no. 2 (February 3, 2010): 224–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2009.00429.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Spagnolo, Antonio G. "Processi deliberativi e formazione alla bioetica / Deliberative processes and bioethics training." Medicina e Morale 65, no. 2 (September 21, 2016): 117–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/mem.2016.429.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Magalhães, Suzana de Cassia Serrão, and Danila Cal. "DELIBERAÇÃO E COMUNICAÇÃO: APROXIMAÇÕES CONCEITUAIS PARA A CRIAÇÃO DE CAPACIDADES DELIBERATIVAS EM ESCOLAS." Aturá - Revista Pan-Amazônica de Comunicação 3, no. 1 (January 16, 2019): 48–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.20873/uft.2526-8031.2019v3n1p48.

Full text
Abstract:
O presente trabalho tem como objetivo compreender como o processo comunicativo contribui para a realização de capacitações em deliberação em escolas públicas no Brasil. Aborda-se os conceitos de dupla afetação e reflexividade (MEAD, 2013), deliberação pública e agir comunicativo (HABERMAS, 1997, 2003), e pedagogia deliberativa (SHAFFER et al., 2017). Adiante, o estudo avança para desentranhar o processo comunicativo (BRAGA, 2011) dos conceitos, por meio de uma abordagem relacional da comunicação (FRANÇA, 2016). O trabalho traz contribuições teóricas para promover a prática e o treinamento em deliberação, em que os sujeitos implicados podem, por meio de processos argumentativos, estimular e provocar transformações políticas e sociais. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: agir comunicativo; deliberação; educação; pedagogia deliberativa; processos comunicacionais. ABSTRACT The present paper aims to understand how the communicative process contributes to enable deliberative capacities in youngs in public schools in Brazil. The concepts of double affectation and reflexivity (MEAD, 2013), public deliberation and communicative action (Habermas, 1997, 2003) and deliberative pedagogy (SHAFFER et al., 2017) are discussed. Later, the study advances to describe the communicative process (BRAGA, 2011) in the concepts, through relational communication (FRANCE, 2016). The work brings theoretical contributions to promote practice and training in deliberation, in which the subjects involved can through stimulating processes and provoke political and social transformations. KEYWORDS: communicative action; deliberation; education; deliberative pedagogy; communicational process. RESUMEN El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo comprender cómo el proceso comunicativo contribuye a la realización de capacitaciones en deliberación en escuelas públicas en Brasil. Se abordan los conceptos de doble afectación y reflexividad (MEAD, 2013), deliberación pública y acción comunicativa (HABERMAS, 1997, 2003), y pedagogía deliberativa (SHAFFER et al., 2017). Adelante, el estudio avanza para desentrañar el proceso comunicativo (BRAGA, 2011) de los conceptos, através de un abordaje relacional de la comunicación (FRANCIA, 2016). El trabajo trae contribuciones teóricas para promover la práctica y el entrenamiento en deliberación, en que los sujetos implicados pueden por medio de procesos argumentativos estimular y provocar transformaciones políticas y sociales. PALABRAS CLAVE: acción comunicativa; deliberación; educación; pedagogia deliberativa; proceso comunicativo.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Smith, Graham, and Corinne Wales. "Citizens' Juries and Deliberative Democracy." Political Studies 48, no. 1 (March 2000): 51–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00250.

Full text
Abstract:
In the face of widespread dissatisfaction with contemporary democratic practice, there has been a growing interest in theories of deliberative democracy. However theorists have often failed to sufficiently address the question of institutional design. This paper argues that recent experiments with citizens' juries should be of interest to deliberative democrats. The practice of citizens' juries is considered in light of three deliberative democratic criteria: inclusivity, deliberation and citizenship. It is argued that citizens' juries offer important insights into how democratic deliberation could be institutionalized in contemporary political decision-making processes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Bond, Kenneth, Rebecca Stiffell, and Daniel A. Ollendorf. "Principles for deliberative processes in health technology assessment." International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 36, no. 4 (August 2020): 445–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0266462320000550.

Full text
Abstract:
Deliberative processes are a well-established part of health technology assessment (HTA) programs in a number of high- and middle-income countries, and serve to combine complex sets of evidence, perspectives, and values to support open, transparent, and accountable decision making. Nevertheless, there is little documentation and research to inform the development of effective and efficient deliberative processes, and to evaluate their quality. This article summarizes the 2020 HTAi Global Policy Forum (GPF) discussion on deliberative processes in HTA.Through a combination of small and large group discussion and successive rounds of polling, the GPF members reached strong agreement on three core principles for deliberative processes in HTA: transparency, inclusivity, and impartiality. In addition, discussions revealed other important principles, such as respect, reviewability, consistency, and reasonableness, that may supplement the core set. A number of associated supporting actions for each of the principles are also described in order to make each principle realizable in a given HTA setting. The relative importance of the principles and actions are context-sensitive and must be considered in light of the political, legislative, and operational factors that may influence the functioning of any particular HTA environment within which the deliberative process is situated. The paper ends with suggested concrete next steps that HTA agencies, researchers, and stakeholders might take to move the field forward. The proposed principles and actions, and the next steps, provide a springboard for further research and better documentation of important aspects of deliberation that have historically been infrequently studied.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Barisione, Mauro. "Framing a Deliberation. Deliberative Democracy and the Challenge of Framing Processes." Journal of Deliberative Democracy 8, no. 1 (April 16, 2012): 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.16997/jdd.124.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

McKay, Spencer, and Peter MacLeod. "Practitioner’s Note." Democratic Theory 5, no. 2 (December 1, 2018): 108–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/dt.2018.050209.

Full text
Abstract:
Deliberative forums, such as citizens’ assemblies or reference panels, are one institutionalization of deliberative democracy that has become increasingly commonplace in recent years. MASS LBP is a pioneer in designing and facilitating such long-form deliberative processes in Canada. This article provides an overview of the company’s civic lottery and reference panel process, notes several distinctive features of MASS LBP that are relevant to addressing challenges to democratic deliberation, and outlines possible areas for future research in deliberative democracy applied in both private and public settings.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Deliberative processes"

1

Schechter, Chen. "Deliberative processes of high school principals with a military background /." The Ohio State University, 2000. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu148820267877438.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Hartmann, Angela. "Talking water : assessing deliberative participation in water abstraction decision processes in the Norfolk Broads." Thesis, University of East Anglia, 2002. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.268545.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Maxwell, Simon Andrew. "Car cultures : using deliberative and inclusionary processes to explore meanings of car use in everyday life." Thesis, University College London (University of London), 2001. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.271340.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Studd, Katherine Louise. "Fitness for purpose : English Nature's use of deliberative and inclusionary processes in the delivery of nature conservation policy." Thesis, University College London (University of London), 2003. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.406654.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

au, K. Buselich@murdoch edu, and Kathryn Buselich. "Creating transactional space for sustainability: a case study of the Western Australian Collaboration." Murdoch University, 2007. http://wwwlib.murdoch.edu.au/adt/browse/view/adt-MU20071220.132317.

Full text
Abstract:
Progressing sustainability requires a more networked approach to governance—an approach that connects otherwise segmented policy areas and fosters greater communication among governments, stakeholders and citizens. Of particular importance is the development of discursive spaces in which diverse actors are able to explore the differing knowledge, perspectives and values raised by the challenge of sustainability. This thesis develops the notion of transactional space to bring into focus the processes of reflection, dialogue and mutual learning that effective sustainability discourse involves. In the first part of the thesis I review literature on the theory and practice of participation, deliberation and collaboration, giving particular attention to the ways in which these processes have potential to create space for a depth of exchange and enable participants to engage with the tensions inherent in complex policy issues. While many authors point to the importance of negotiating difference in these processes, the literature reveals that, in practice, this type of exchange tends to be overlooked or underdeveloped. I therefore argue in this thesis that critical, reflective dialogue plays a key role in generating greater understanding among participants, more comprehensive understanding of policy issues, and more integrative and shared approaches, and for these reasons must be actively developed. The case study in the second part of the thesis explores this concern for developing reflective exchange in practice. The formation of the Western Australian Collaboration in 2002—a partnership of non-government organizations from a range of social and environmental perspectives committed to ‘a just and sustainable Western Australia’—represented an opportunity to examine the development of participatory and collaborative processes for sustainability. The thesis presents a case study of the WA Collaboration’s development over 2002-2006 to illustrate the potential such networks and open forums offer for transformative exchange around sustainability. It describes the intensive process conducted with the Steering Committee to cultivate a culture of reflection and learning in the organization, and the practical initiatives the process helped to generate. The thesis concludes with a discussion of the lessons learnt and key principles and practical considerations relevant to fostering transactional space. The WA Collaboration experience and the review of literature reveal a tendency in practice to privilege action and outcomes over reflection and learning. Furthermore, despite the necessity for a depth of engagement with complex policy issues, funding systems and policy environments often fail to allow the time and resources needed to support genuine dialogue and collaborative work. The thesis provides the concept and principles of transactional space as a means of helping to address this imbalance. They are designed to encourage practitioners to create opportunities for critical, reflective dialogue in a range of deliberative settings.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Hendriks, Carolyn Maree, and C. M. Hendriks@uva nl. "Public Deliberation and Interest Organisations: a Study of Responses to Lay Citizen Engagement in Public Policy." The Australian National University. Research School of Social Sciences, 2004. http://thesis.anu.edu.au./public/adt-ANU20050921.103047.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis empirically examines how lobby groups and activists respond to innovative forms of public participation. The study centres on processes that foster a particular kind of deliberative governance including citizens’ juries, consensus conferences and planning cells. These deliberative designs bring together a panel of randomly selected lay citizens to deliberate on a specific policy issue for a few days, with the aim of providing decision makers with a set of recommendations. While policy makers worldwide are attracted to these novel participatory processes, little consideration has been given to how well they work alongside more adversarial and interest-based politics. This doctoral research project examines this interface by studying what these processes mean to different kinds of policy actors such as corporations, advocacy groups, government agencies, experts and professionals. These entities are collectively referred to in this thesis as ‘interest organisations’ because in some way they are seeking a specific policy outcome from the state – even government-based groups.¶ The empirical research in this thesis is based on comparative case studies of four deliberative design projects in Australia and Germany. The Australian cases include a citizens’ jury on waste management legislation and a consensus conference on gene technology in the food chain. The German case studies include a planning cells project on consumer protection in Bavaria, and a national consensus conference on genetic diagnostics. Together the cases capture a diversity of complex and contested policy issues facing post-industrialised societies. In each case study, I examine how relevant interest organisations responded to the deliberative forum, and then interpret these responses in view of the context and features of the case.¶ The picture emerging from the in-depth case studies is that interest organisations respond to deliberative designs in a variety of ways. Some choose to participate actively, others passively decline, and a few resort to strategic tactics to undermine citizens’ deliberations. The empirical research reveals that though responses are variable, most interest organisations are challenged by several features of the deliberative design model including: 1) that deliberators are citizens with no knowledge or association with the issue; 2) that experts and interest representatives are required to present their arguments before a citizens’ panel; and 3) that policy discussions occur under deliberative conditions which can expose the illegitimate use of power.¶ Despite these challenges, the paradox is that many interest organisations do decide to engage in lay citizen deliberations. The empirical research indicates that groups and experts value deliberative designs if they present an opportunity for public relations, customer feedback, or advocacy. Moreover, the research finds that when policy actors intensively engage with ‘ordinary’ citizens, their technocratic and elite ideas about public participation can shift in a more inclusive and deliberative direction.¶ The thesis finds that, on the whole, weaker interest organisations are more willing to engage with lay citizens than stronger organisations because they welcome the chance to influence public debate and decision makers. It appears that powerful groups will only engage in a deliberative forum under certain policy conditions, for example, when the dominant policy paradigm is unstable and contested, when public discussion on the issue is emerging, when policy networks are interdependent and heterogeneous, and when the broader social and political system supports public accountability, consensus and deliberation. Given that these kinds of policy conditions do not always exist, I conclude that tensions between interest organisations and deliberative governance will be common. In order to create more cooperative and productive interfaces, I recommend that interest organisations be better supported and integrated into citizens’ deliberations, and that steps be taken to safeguard forums from strategic attempts to undermine their legitimacy.¶ The thesis also sends out three key messages to democratic theorists. First, the empirical research shows that different kinds of groups and actors in civil society vary in their willingness and capacity to participate to public deliberation. Second, the deliberative design model demonstrates that partisan actors, such as interest organisations, will engage in public deliberation when they can participate as strategic deliberators. In this role partisans are not expected to relinquish their agendas, but present them as testimonies before a group of deliberators. Third, the empirical research in this thesis should bring home to theorists that deliberative forums are closely linked to the discursive context within which they operate.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Gonzaga, Rosalba Maria Morais. "Desenho institucional e efetividade deliberativa dos conselhos de saúde: dinâmicas de participação e processo decisório no município de João Pessoa PB." Universidade Federal da Paraí­ba, 2011. http://tede.biblioteca.ufpb.br:8080/handle/tede/7284.

Full text
Abstract:
Made available in DSpace on 2015-05-14T13:27:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 arquivototal.pdf: 1184540 bytes, checksum: 7b0bd7d498f5cd77eb7caeb50001f8a8 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011-12-12
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES
In health, the creation of forums as Health Councils and the effect of the decentralization process emphasized by the Constitution of 1988, resulted in higher powers and the increasing importance of the public sphere of municipal administration. However, the participation of Councillors in the process of decision making has been identified as one of the challenging aspects in the work of these committees, because of limitations imposed by the powers of representation. The research is focused on understanding of this process, with emphasis on analyzes of the Municipal Health Council of João Pessoa (CMS/JP), more specifically, with regard to decision making and their effectiveness discussed. To this end, several analyzes were performed starting from a study of qualitative and quantitative, by using the linking of data from three basic elements in this study: information obtained from observations on the CMS / JP, texts of the Acts of the CMS/JP and texts drawn from interviews with some of the Municipal Board of Health/JP-CP. Under the quantitative approach, tables were compiled, whose goal was to obtain, among other data related to the issue of quorum at meetings of the CMS/JP, that is related to the presence / absence of Councillors representatives of the segments in that council. Once extracted, the data were tabulated from the use of measures of central tendency: mean, median, aiming to analyze the participation of the numerical representation for each segment in the meetings of the CMS/JP-CP. As the study indicates, the CMS/JP has acted in a much more purposeful than deliberative, ie, note that this collegiate has presented great difficulties for the performance of its deliberative character, with little expression of some debates in the field where the participation does not always result in significant decision-making influence in the deliberations of the municipal public health policies, focusing on very fragile deliberative.
No campo da saúde, a criação de fóruns, como Conselhos de Saúde, e o efeito do processo de descentralização, enfatizado a partir da Constituição de 1988, resultaram em maiores atribuições e aumento da importância da esfera pública municipal de administração. Contudo, a participação de Conselheiros no processo de tomadas de decisão tem sido apontada como um dos aspectos desafiadores na atuação desses colegiados, em razão das limitações impostas à representação pelos poderes instituídos. A pesquisa está voltada à apreensão desta reflexão, com ênfase nas análises do Conselho Municipal de Saúde de João Pessoa-PB (CMS/JP), mais especificamente, no que diz respeito ao processo decisório e sua efetividade deliberativa. Para tanto, foram realizadas diversas análises, partindo de um estudo de cunho qualitativo e quantitativo, sendo utilizado o cruzamento de dados entre três elementos basilares no referido estudo: informações obtidas através das observações no CMS/JP, textos das Atas do CMS/JP e textos elaborados a partir das entrevistas com alguns dos Conselheiros Municipais de Saúde/JP-PB. Sob o enfoque quantitativo, foram elaboradas tabelas, cujo objetivo foi obter, entre outros, dados relacionados à questão do quórum nas reuniões do CMS/JP, isto é, à presença/ausência de Conselheiros representantes dos segmentos no referido colegiado. Depois de extraídos, os dados foram tabulados a partir do uso de medidas de tendência central: média e mediana, com intuito de analisar a participação numérica da representação por segmento nas reuniões do CMS/JP-PB. Conforme indica o estudo, o CMS/JP tem atuado de forma muito mais propositiva do que deliberativa, ou seja, nota-se que este colegiado tem apresentado grandes dificuldades para o desempenho do seu caráter deliberativo, com pouca expressividade no campo de alguns debates onde a participação nem sempre resulta em significativa influência decisória nas deliberações das políticas públicas de saúde municipal, incidindo em grande fragilidade deliberativa.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Jones, James H. "Detecting hidden computer processes by deliberate resource exhaustion." Fairfax, VA : George Mason University, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/1920/3385.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (Ph.D.)--George Mason University, 2008.
Vita: p. 259. Thesis director: Kathryn B. Laskey. Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Computational Sciences and Informatics. Title from PDF t.p. (viewed Mar. 17, 2009). Includes bibliographical references (p. 255-258). Also issued in print.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Clemente, Augusto Junior. "Democracia deliberativa e esfera pública." reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFPR, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/1884/26179.

Full text
Abstract:
Resumo: Após a transição democrática nos anos 1980, o Brasil desenvolveu diversos instrumentos de democracia participativa, incluindo aqueles voltados a questões orçamentárias, sobretudo em nível local. Por esta perspectiva, o sistema legal brasileiro constituiu leis estabelecendo a participação popular na construção de políticas públicas, tais como a Lei de Responsabilidade Fiscal e o Estatuto da Cidade. Como resultado, todos os níveis de governo (a União, estados e municípios) constituíram diferentes arranjos para atender às coerções institucionais. As Audiências Públicas orçamentárias da cidade de Curitiba são um desses arranjos, sendo o objeto deste estudo. Deste modo, cabe perguntar: como ocorre o processo deliberativo das Audiências Públicas enquanto estruturas de absorção dos inputs societais? Quais as semelhanças e divergências das Audiências Públicas realizadas pelos poderes executivo e leg slativo em Curitiba? Nosso objetivo é estabelecer uma comparação entre esses dois âmbitos sob a perspectiva da democracia deliberativa. Para tanto, a pesquisa se concentrou entre os anos de 2009 e 2010. Nossa metodologia foi composta pela observação etnográfica e entrevistas em profundidade, sendo consideradas as seguintes variáveis, retiradas e adaptadas do estudo de Faria e Ribeiro (2010): (1) desenho institucional: arcabouço e funcionamento, condições de participação, discussão e decisão; (2) contextuais: o grau de associativismo civil e os grupos dirigentes; (3) políticas: alcance da representação e participação popular, bem como o seu poder de deliberação; (4) espaço-temporal: a propensão espacial à participação e a duração das reuniões e debates; (5) accountability: a transparência e a responsividade of recidas por esses arranjos institucionais deliberativos à Sociedade Civil.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Villar, Jo??o Heliofar de Jesus. "Os limites da argumenta????o religiosa na esfera p??blica." Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, 2016. https://bdtd.ucb.br:8443/jspui/handle/tede/2208.

Full text
Abstract:
Submitted by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2017-08-09T16:39:01Z No. of bitstreams: 1 JoaoHeliofardeJesusVillarDissertacao2016.pdf: 1435135 bytes, checksum: 9dafb3b1a590e73843c1fad0baa840b5 (MD5)
Approved for entry into archive by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2017-08-09T16:42:55Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 JoaoHeliofardeJesusVillarDissertacao2016.pdf: 1435135 bytes, checksum: 9dafb3b1a590e73843c1fad0baa840b5 (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2017-08-09T16:42:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 JoaoHeliofardeJesusVillarDissertacao2016.pdf: 1435135 bytes, checksum: 9dafb3b1a590e73843c1fad0baa840b5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016-11-26
This dissertation addresses the following question: Given that the state obeys the principle of secularism, religious reasons are admissible in the public sphere, in the debate involving fundamental issues aiming political decisions? That is, in the deliberative process which occurs in the public arena, is it compatible with the obligations of citizenship that someone support a legislation, or a public policy, grounded in religious reasons? In political philosophy, there are three main ways to answer this question, which will be studied here, having as starting point the theory of public reason of John Rawls and others: (i) the thesis sustaining that the principle of secularism implies that religious arguments must be circumscribed to private sphere; (ii) the admissibility of this sort of arguments, provided that they were translated in public reasons, universally accessible; (iii) the defense of the participation of the religious person in the public debate, without any restriction, as a corollary of his right of free expression in the public deliberative process. The study ends with a summary where the author try to present a conclusion with a proposal of conciliation.
Esta disserta????o se prop??e a responder a seguinte pergunta: Estabelecido que o Estado ?? laico, ?? admiss??vel a introdu????o de raz??es religiosas no debate na esfera p??blica, acerca de quest??es fundamentais sobre as quais o Estado deva formalizar a sua vontade? Isto ??, na arena p??blica, no processo de delibera????o pol??tica, ?? poss??vel ao cidad??o defender uma legisla????o ou uma pol??tica p??blica com base em raz??es de natureza religiosa? S??o abordadas tr??s posi????es que procuram responder a essa indaga????o, tendo como ponto de partida e contraponto a doutrina das raz??es p??blicas defendida por John Rawls e outros autores: (i) a tese de que, em decorr??ncia da laicidade, o argumento religioso deve ficar circunscrito ?? esfera privada; (ii) a admiss??o desse argumento no debate pol??tico, desde que traduzido em raz??es p??blicas, universalmente acess??veis; e (iii) a defesa da participa????o do religioso, no debate pol??tico, sem constri????o de qualquer natureza, como consequ??ncia do seu direito ?? livre express??o no processo de delibera????o p??blica. O estudo finaliza com um breve resumo seguido de uma conclus??o que procura apresentar uma concilia????o dessas posi????es, numa perspectiva pluralista.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Deliberative processes"

1

Constitutional courts and deliberative democracy. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

1978-, Röcke Anja, and Herzberg Carsten, eds. Participatory budgeting in Europe: Democracy and public governance. Farnham, Surry, England: Ashgate Publishing Limited, 2016.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

1953-, Griffith Gareth, and New South Wales Parliament, eds. Decision and deliberation: The parliament of New South Wales 1856-2003. Sydney: Federation Press, 2005.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Carolyn, Hendriks, ed. The politics of public deliberation: Citizen engagement and interest advocacy. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

R, Johnson Timothy, and Wedeking Justin, eds. Oral arguments and coalition formation on the U.S. Supreme Court: A deliberate dialogue. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Rivera-Rivera, Dominga. Las asociaciones y normas procesales para sus asambleas deliberativas: Guía práctica para la organización y dirección de asociaciones. [Hato Rey, P.R.?]: Casa Editora, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Forester, John F. Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. MIT Press, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Forester, John F. The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. The MIT Press, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Consumers And Nanotechnology Deliberative Processes And Methodologies. Pan Stanford Publishing, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. The MIT Press, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Deliberative processes"

1

Smith, Cobi, and Gene Rowe. "Deliberative Processes in Practice." In The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology, 59–70. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32240-7_5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Melrose, Susan. "Expert-intuitive and deliberative processes." In Contemporary Choreography, 25–40. Second edition. | Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2017.: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315563596-4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Dyrkolbotn, Sjur, and Truls Pedersen. "Computing Consensus: A Logic for Reasoning About Deliberative Processes Based on Argumentation." In Multi-Agent Systems, 205–19. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14174-5_14.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Niemeyer, Simon. "Knowledge and the Deliberative Stance in Democratic Systems: Harnessing Scepticism of the Self in Governing Global Environmental Change." In Knowledge for Governance, 269–92. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47150-7_12.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractModern challenges, such as global environmental change, cannot be dealt with via the generation of knowledge alone. Even in-principle public support requires broad recognition of responsibility to translate knowledge into appropriate action. This cannot be achieved where minds are closed, in which case greater levels of knowledge can actually feed into perverse outcomes. Overcoming these dynamics is facilitated to the extent that individuals adopt a deliberative stance (Owen D, Smith G, J Political Philosophy 23:213–234, 2015), which involves, inter alia, openness to ideas and hastens the rush to judgement on issues involving uncertainty and complexity—a scepticism of the self. In this paper, the author demonstrates the effects of the deliberative stance and the conditions under which it is best achieved. I draw my evidence from small-scale settings described by deliberative minipublics, but the observed mechanisms can be “scaled up” to inform possibilities for wider reform of the processes governing the uptake and use of knowledge.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Forester, John. "Beyond Dialogue to Transformative Learning: How Deliberative Rituals Encourage Political Judgment in Community Planning Processes." In The GeoJournal Library, 81–103. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5462-8_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Tillman, J. Jeffrey. "Dual Processes Interacting in Moral Deliberation." In An Integrative Model of Moral Deliberation, 167–94. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49022-3_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Short, Dan. "Choice and Deliberation." In Making Psychotherapy More Effective with Unconscious Process Work, 37–53. New York: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003127208-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Brazier, F. M. T., C. M. Jonker, J. Treur, and N. J. E. Wijngaards. "Deliberate Evolution in Multi-Agent Systems." In Dynamics and Management of Reasoning Processes, 363–80. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1743-4_17.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Subirats, Joan. "Policy Instruments, Public Deliberation and Evaluation Processes." In Environmental Policy in Search of New Instruments, 143–57. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8504-0_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

"Resources for representative deliberative processes." In Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions. OECD, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/941394d2-en.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Deliberative processes"

1

Xiao, Lu, Weiyu Zhang, Anna Przybylska, Anna De Liddo, Gregorio Convertino, Todd Davies, and Mark Klein. "Design for Online Deliberative Processes and Technologies." In CHI '15: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2727687.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Usher, Sam. "Integrating Natural and Social Sciences to Inspire Public Confidence in Radioactive Waste Policy Case Study: Committee on Radioactive Waste Management." In The 11th International Conference on Environmental Remediation and Radioactive Waste Management. ASMEDC, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/icem2007-7240.

Full text
Abstract:
Implementing effective long-term radioactive waste management policy is challenging, and both UK and international experience is littered with policy and programme failures. Policy must not only be underpinned by sound science and technical rationale, it must also inspire the confidence of the public and other stakeholders. However, in today’s modern society, communities will not simply accept the word of scientists for setting policy based purely on technical grounds. This is particularly so in areas where there are significant social and ethical issues, such as radioactive waste disposal. To develop and implement effective policy, governments, waste owners and implementing bodies must develop processes which effectively integrate both complex technical and scientific issues, with equally challenging social and ethical concerns. These integrating processes must marry often intricate technical issues with broad public and stakeholder engagement programmes, in programmes which can expect the highest levels of public scrutiny, and must invariably be delivered within challenging time and budget constraints. This paper considers a model for how such integrating processes can be delivered. The paper reviews, as a case study, how such challenges were overcome by the Committee on Radioactive Waste Management (CoRWM), which, in July 2006, made recommendations to the UK government for the establishment of a long-term radioactive waste policy. Its recommendations were underpinned by sound science, but also engendered public confidence through undertaking the largest and most significant deliberative public and stakeholder engagement programme on a complex policy issue in the UK. Effective decision-making was enabled through the integration of both proven and bespoke methodologies, including Multi-criteria Decision Analysis and Holistic assessments, coupled with an overarching deliberative approach. How this was managed and delivered to programme demonstrates how important effective integration of different issues, interests and world views can be achieved, and the paper looks forward to how the continued integration of both natural and social sciences is essential if public confidence is to be maintained through implementation stages. This paper will be particularly relevant to governments, waste owners and implementing bodies who are responsible for developing and implementing policy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Karger, Cornelia. "USING AHP FOR DELIBERATIVE MULTICRITERIA-EVALUATION OF FUTURE SCENARIOS." In The International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Creative Decisions Foundation, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.13033/isahp.y2011.014.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Hoey, Jesse, Zahra Sheikhbahaee, and Neil J. MacKinnon. "Deliberative and Affective Reasoning: a Bayesian Dual-Process Model." In 2019 8th International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction Workshops and Demos (ACIIW). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/aciiw.2019.8925215.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Talaat, H., and B. Abdulhai. "Modeling Driver Psychological Deliberation During Dynamic Route Selection Processes." In 2006 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference. IEEE, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/itsc.2006.1706823.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Gordon, Eric, Becky E. Michelson, and Jason Haas. "@Stake: A Game to Facilitate the Process of Deliberative Democracy." In the 19th ACM Conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2818052.2869125.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Dignum, Virginia. "Responsible Autonomy." In Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/655.

Full text
Abstract:
As intelligent systems are increasingly making decisions that directly affect society, perhaps the most important upcoming research direction in AI is to rethink the ethical implications of their actions. Means are needed to integrate moral, societal and legal values with technological developments in AI, both during the design process as well as part of the deliberation algorithms employed by these systems. In this paper, we describe leading ethics theories and propose alternative ways to ensure ethical behavior by artificial systems. Given that ethics are dependent on the socio-cultural context and are often only implicit in deliberation processes, methodologies are needed to elicit the values held by designers and stakeholders, and to make these explicit leading to better understanding and trust on artificial autonomous systems.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Mallick, S., and S. Krishna. "Requirements engineering: problem domain knowledge capture and the deliberation process support." In Proceedings. Tenth International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 99. IEEE, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/dexa.1999.795199.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

He, Tianyu, Yingce Xia, Jianxin Lin, Xu Tan, Di He, Tao Qin, and Zhibo Chen. "Deliberation Learning for Image-to-Image Translation." In Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-19}. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2019/345.

Full text
Abstract:
Image-to-image translation, which transfers an image from a source domain to a target one, has attracted much attention in both academia and industry. The major approach is to adopt an encoder-decoder based framework, where the encoder extracts features from the input image and then the decoder decodes the features and generates an image in the target domain as the output. In this paper, we go beyond this learning framework by considering an additional polishing step on the output image. Polishing an image is very common in human's daily life, such as editing and beautifying a photo in Photoshop after taking/generating it by a digital camera. Such a deliberation process is shown to be very helpful and important in practice and thus we believe it will also be helpful for image translation. Inspired by the success of deliberation network in natural language processing, we extend deliberation process to the field of image translation. We verify our proposed method on four two-domain translation tasks and one multi-domain translation task. Both the qualitative and quantitative results demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Gouvêa Galhardo, José Antonio. "ICT REGULATION PROCESS IN A CIVIL LAW, PERIPHERAL, AND MULTILEVEL ADMINISTRATION COUNTRY: HABERMAS DELIBERATIVE PARADIGM REVISITED." In International Conferences on: Internet Technologies & Society and Sustainability, Technology and Education 2020. IADIS Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.33965/its_ste2020_202001d015.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Deliberative processes"

1

Ram, Ashwin. Modeling Multistrategy Learning as a Deliberative Process of Planning. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, December 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada399291.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Osejo, Alejandra, Ana María Garrido, Juana Alvarez, Santiago Martínez, Diana Lara, Omar Ruiz, and Bernardo Posada. Guía para la caracterización de la gobernanza en paisajes rurales. Edited by Alejandra Osejo. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, December 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.21068/cssbgobernanza2019.

Full text
Abstract:
Este documento contiene definiciones, procedimientos y protocolos para el diseño y ejecución de estudios de gobernanza ambiental en paisajes rurales. Se enmarca en un enfoque desarrollado el Instituto Humboldt denominado transiciones socioecológicas hacia la sostenibilidad, las cuales son entendidas como procesos de gestión de la biodiversidad basados en acuerdos entre los actores sociales con el fin de modificar las trayectorias de cambio indeseado en los ecosistemas y la sociedad. El objeto de esta guía es orientar el diseño y ejecución de estudios de gobernanza en paisajes rurales que sustenten procesos de construcción de dichos acuerdos. Para tal fin, basados en los enfoques de la gobernanza adaptativa, reflexiva, deliberativa y coproducida, se definen conceptos como sostenibilidad, justicia ambiental y equidad. Adicionalmente se presenta definiciones acerca del paisaje como categoría analítica y se presentan líneas de indagación asociadas a las cuestiones fundamentales de la gobernanza. En consecuencia con el marco conceptual, se detallan los pasos para el desarrollo de dichos estudios, incluyendo orientaciones para la formulación del problema y la pregunta de investigación.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Deliberative processes' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography