Relevant bibliographies by topics / Deliberative democracy

Academic literature on the topic 'Deliberative democracy'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 29 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Contents

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Deliberative democracy.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Deliberative democracy"

1

Uhr, John. "Testing Deliberative Democracy: The 1999 Australian Republic Referendum." Government and Opposition 35, no. 2 (April 2000): 189–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1477-7053.00023.

Full text
Abstract:
THIS ARTICLE EXAMINES AUSTRALIAN REFERENDUM PRACTICE WITH the aim of contributing to the growing international debate over concepts of deliberative democracy, defined in terms of democratic regimes structured to maximize community deliberation in public decision-making. Theories of deliberative democracy go beyond earlier approaches to participatory democracy by specifying in greater detail the nature of the deliberative process in which citizens should be able to participate and of the importance of institutions of civil society to an effective deliberative process. The focus on ideals of public deliberation ref lects the ambition of deliberative democrats (the ‘deliberati’ if you will) to ground political decision-making in norms of shared public reason. Where earlier approaches to participatory democracy investigated rights to political participation, current approaches to deliberative democracy also investigate responsibilities of political participants – particularly responsibilities to comply with norms of rational political deliberation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Mendes Motta, Filipe. "A expansão da agenda deliberativa, poder e populismo (Entrevista com Nicole Curato)." Compolítica 11, no. 1 (November 3, 2021): 145–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.21878/compolitica.2021.11.1.468.

Full text
Abstract:
Nicole Curato é professora associada no Centre for Deliberative Democracy and Global Governance, na Universidade de Camberra, na Austrália. Nos últimos anos, fez numerosas contribuições teóricas e empíricas para a pesquisa deliberativa, publicando os livros Power in Deliberative Democracy (2019, em coautoria com Marit Hammond e John Min) e Democracy in a Time of Misery (CURATO, 2019), uma extensa etnografia sobre como a vida pública foi reconstruída no sequência de um tufão mortal nas Filipinas. Nicole também tem colaborado para as discussões sobre populismo e democracia. Nesta conversa, Nicole discute os últimos avanços nos estudos sobre democracia deliberativa, incluindo a ampliação da diversidade de questões abordadas por esse campo de pesquisa, as relações entre poder e deliberação, a intensificação de experimentos deliberativos com minipúblicos e a importância de abordagens etnográficas para a pesquisa democrática.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Ebeling, Martin, and Fabio Wolkenstein. "Exercising Deliberative Agency in Deliberative Systems." Political Studies 66, no. 3 (September 29, 2017): 635–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0032321717723514.

Full text
Abstract:
At the heart of the ideal of deliberative democracy lies an emphasis on the political autonomy of citizens participating in procedures of public justification aimed at the promotion of the common good. The recent systemic turn in deliberative democracy has moved so far away from this ideal that it relegates the deliberations of citizens to a secondary matter, legitimising forms of rule that may even undermine the normative impulses central to the project of deliberative democracy. We critically discuss this theoretical development and show how deliberative agency can effectively be exercised in complex political systems. We argue, in particular, that political parties play a central role in facilitating the exercise of deliberative agency, fostering deliberation among citizens and linking their deliberations to decisions. Instead of giving up on the possibility that citizens participate in procedures of public justification, deliberative democrats should look to parties’ unique ability to enable deliberation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Barker, Derek W. M. "Deliberative Justice and Collective Identity." Political Theory 45, no. 1 (August 3, 2016): 116–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0090591715609407.

Full text
Abstract:
Drawing upon insights from virtue ethics, this essay develops a concept of collective identity specifically suited to deliberative democracy: a virtues-centered theory of deliberative justice. Viewing democratic legitimacy as a political phenomenon, we must account for more than the formal rules that must be satisfied according to deontological theories of deliberative democracy. I argue that common approaches to deliberative democracy are unable to account for the motivations of deliberation, or ensure that citizens have the cognitive skills to deliberate well. Next, I engage with critics of deliberative democracy who have moved toward broader and more humanistic concepts of deliberation but have stopped short of conceiving of justice as a virtue and, in their own way, neglected questions of collective identity. I reconstruct justice as a virtue from a deliberative perspective, combining virtue ethics’ emphasis on habituation with a weaker sense of collective identity that allows for value pluralism and disagreement, consistent with deliberative democracy. That is, deliberative democracy requires a shared and habituated civic culture of mutual understanding of differences. Finally, drawing from discourse on race in contemporary American politics, I conclude with brief illustrations of the need for a collective identity based on mutual understanding. Although deliberative democracy does not require a thick or intense sense of social solidarity, it does need citizens to share habits, inclinations, and capacities to engage in communication across their differences.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Garner, Robert. "Animal rights and the deliberative turn in democratic theory." European Journal of Political Theory 18, no. 3 (February 25, 2016): 309–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1474885116630937.

Full text
Abstract:
Deliberative democracy has been castigated by those who regard it as exclusive and elitist because of its failure to take into account a range of structural inequalities existing within contemporary liberal democracies. As a result, it is suggested, deliberative arenas will merely reproduce these inequalities, advantaging the already powerful extolling mainstream worldviews excluding the interests of the less powerful and those expounding alternative worldviews. Moreover, the tactics employed by those excluded social movements seeking to right an injustice are typically those – involving various forms of protest and direct action – which are incompatible with the key characteristics of deliberatively democracy. This paper seeks to examine the case against deliberative democracy through the prism of animal rights. It will be argued that the critique of deliberative democracy, at least in the case of animal rights, is largely misplaced because it underestimates the rationalistic basis of animal rights philosophy, misunderstands the aspirational character of deliberative theory and mistakenly attributes problems that are not restricted to deliberation but result from interest group politics in general. It is further argued that this debate about the apparent incompatibility between the ideals of deliberative democracy and non-deliberative activism disguises the potential that deliberative democracy has for advocates of animal rights and, by extension, other social movements too.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Benson, Jonathan. "Deliberative democracy and the problem of tacit knowledge." Politics, Philosophy & Economics 18, no. 1 (June 15, 2018): 76–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1470594x18782086.

Full text
Abstract:
This article defends deliberative democracy against the problem of tacit knowledge. It has been argued that deliberative democracy gives a privileged position to linguistic communication and therefore excludes tacit forms of knowledge which cannot be expressed propositionally. This article shows how the exclusion of such knowledge presents important challenges to both proceduralist and epistemic conceptions of deliberative democracy, and how it has been taken by some to favour markets over democratic institutions. After pointing to the limitations of market alternatives, deliberative democracy is defended by arguing that tacit knowledge can be brought into deliberation through the mechanism of trust in testimony. By trusting the testimony of a speaker, deliberators are able to act on knowledge even without it being explicitly expressed. The article then goes on to discuss the implications of this defence for deliberative theory, and particularly, the forms of reason which deliberative democrats must see as legitimate.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Smith, Graham, and Corinne Wales. "Citizens' Juries and Deliberative Democracy." Political Studies 48, no. 1 (March 2000): 51–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.00250.

Full text
Abstract:
In the face of widespread dissatisfaction with contemporary democratic practice, there has been a growing interest in theories of deliberative democracy. However theorists have often failed to sufficiently address the question of institutional design. This paper argues that recent experiments with citizens' juries should be of interest to deliberative democrats. The practice of citizens' juries is considered in light of three deliberative democratic criteria: inclusivity, deliberation and citizenship. It is argued that citizens' juries offer important insights into how democratic deliberation could be institutionalized in contemporary political decision-making processes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Ercan, Selen A. "Deliberative Democracy." Democratic Theory 6, no. 1 (June 1, 2019): 97–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.3167/dt.2019.060106.

Full text
Abstract:
Deliberative democracy is a growing branch of democratic theory. It suggests understanding and assessing democracy in terms of the quality of communication among citizens, politicians, as well as between citizens and politicians. In this interview, drawing on his extensive research on deliberative practice within and beyond parliaments, André Bächtiger reflects on the development of the field over the last two decades, the relationship between normative theory and empirical research, and the prospects for practicing deliberation in populist times.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Kim, Won Dong. "Complement to James S. Fishkin’s Theory of Deliberative Democracy : Focusing on Representative, Deliberation, Political Equality of Edmund Burke, John Stuart Mill." Korean Association of Regional Sociology 23, no. 3 (December 31, 2022): 5–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.35175/krs.2022.23.3.5.

Full text
Abstract:
James S. Fishkin is one of the major theorists who have intensively studied on the problem of deliberation from the beginning of the theory of deliberative democracy. Theory of citizen-led deliberative democracy could be understood as the latest type of democracy in his typology of democracy. But, his theory of deliberative democracy involves some internal limitations. For example, the analyses of both the role of political representation in the history of Western democracies and changes in its character are not sufficiently reflected in Fishkin’s theory of democracy. Especially, the connection from elite deliberation to civic-led deliberation does not seem to be smooth. From this viewpoint, this study aims to complement Fishkin’s theory of deliberative democracy by examining representation, deliberation, and political equality suggested by Edmund Burke and John Stuart Mill. This attempt is expected to contribute to strengthen the historical, empirical, and theoretical foundations on the function of representation and the main agents of deliberation which are needed for the elaboration of Fishkin's theory of deliberative democracy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Dieleman, Susan. "Epistemic Justice and Democratic Legitimacy." Hypatia 30, no. 4 (2015): 794–810. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12173.

Full text
Abstract:
The deliberative turn in political philosophy sees theorists attempting to ground democratic legitimacy in free, rational, and public deliberation among citizens. However, feminist theorists have criticized prominent accounts of deliberative democracy, and of the public sphere that is its site, for being too exclusionary. Iris Marion Young, Nancy Fraser, and Seyla Benhabib show that deliberative democrats generally fail to attend to substantive inclusion in their conceptions of deliberative space, even though they endorse formal inclusion. If we take these criticisms seriously, we are tasked with articulating a substantively inclusive account of deliberation. I argue in this article that enriching existing theories of deliberative democracy with Fricker's conception of epistemic in/justice yields two specific benefits. First, it enables us to detect instances of epistemic injustice, and therefore failures of inclusion, within deliberative spaces. Second, it can act as a model for constructing deliberative spaces that are more inclusive and therefore better able to ground democratic legitimacy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Deliberative democracy"

1

Chappell, Zsuzsanna. "Deliberation disputed : a critique of deliberative democracy." Thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London), 2008. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/2340/.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis critically re-examines deliberative democracy from a rational and social-choice-theoretic perspective and questions its dominance in current democratic theory. I define deliberative democracy as reasoned, inclusive, equal and other-regarding debate aimed at making decisions collectively. The thesis examines both procedural and epistemic justifications for deliberative democracy. Procedural justifications are based on the normative values that underpin the theory of deliberative democracy: reasoned debate, equality and inclusion. The epistemic justification of deliberative democracy states that it will arrive at better outcomes or the truth more often than other democratic procedures. I conclude that the justifications offered for the claim that the model of deliberative democracy is superior to other models of democracy are not solid enough to warrant the strength of the conclusions presented in the literature. The thesis also examines whether deliberation is likely to produce the positive consequences that its proponents ascribe to it by using findings from deliberative experiments, political science, psychology and other social sciences. I find that many assumptions about human nature and motivation that deliberative democrats make cannot be supported by empirical evidence. They do not sufficiently consider problems of instrumental rationality, cognitive limitations, self-interested behaviour and a lack of motivation to participate in highly resource intensive activities. Furthermore, the model of deliberative democracy is based on a very particular conception of politics. This conception is somewhat apolitical, requires a high level of popular participation and conflicts with other, more adversarial or interest-based conceptions of politics. Through these findings I challenge the dominant position of deliberative democracy in the current literature on democratic theory and argue in favour of a more comprehensive theory of democracy that puts more emphasis on other democratic mechanisms, such as representation or interest group politics.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Danielsen, James. "Pyramidal deliberative democracy." Thesis, Rhodes University, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10962/74502.

Full text
Abstract:
This dissertation has two main objectives. First, to outline an ICT-facilitated model of democracy called ‘pyramidal democracy’ that reconciles deliberative democracy with mass engagement. Second, to suggest how this model of democracy might engender the democratisation of the global economy and thus the provision of a basic level of economic security for all global citizens. At the core of the model is the pyramidal deliberative network, a means of organising citizens into small online deliberative groups and linking these groups together by means of an iterative process of delegate-selection and group-formation. The pyramidal network enables citizens to aggregate their preferences in a deliberative manner, and then project social power by authorizing the delegates at the top-tier of the pyramidal network to communicate their social demands to elected officials or to other points of authority. The envisioned outcome is the democratisation of the public sphere by means of the proliferation of deliberative networks in the government, market, and civil society spheres. Transnational pyramidal networks may make it feasible to instantiate a new citizen-based schema of global governance and, thereby, facilitate the reform of the United Nations and enable a transition towards global peace, sustainability, and distributive justice. Distributive justice might be achieved by means of implementing the six components of a democratised economy: participatory budgeting, fee-and-dividend taxes, a basic income, monetary reform, workplace democracy, and the sharing economy. Taken together, these components might enable the universal provision of a social minimum – a universal basic income sufficient for basic security and real freedom. Taken to its logical conclusion, a democratised economy may also enable a transition towards a post-scarcity economic order characterised by a maximal stock of humanmade and natural capital that would not exceed the sustainable carrying capacity of the earth.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Wolkenstein, Fabio. "Deliberative democracy within parties." Thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London), 2016. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/3365/.

Full text
Abstract:
Political parties serve a number of vital functions in representative democracies. Connecting citizens to government is perhaps the most important one. This is how parties were traditionally conceived, and it continues to be the main standard according to which their legitimacy as representative institutions is evaluated. In recent times, observers have noted a growing disconnect between citizens and parties. Parties have gradually transformed from agents that mediate between state and civil society to agents of the state. This sits uncomfortably with the ideal of parties as connectors of citizens and government. How can their capacity to perform this function be restored? This thesis seeks to offer a new answer to this question. Its main argument is that to revitalise their capacity to connect citizens and government, parties need to become more internally democratic, and that they need to become more internally democratic in a particular way, namely more internally deliberative. By this is meant that parties need to strengthen channels of communication from the bottom up and avail themselves of their internal deliberative resources: of the partisans on the ground, who deliberate over the demands of their community in local party branches. The theoretical part of the thesis proposes a model—called a “deliberative model of intraparty democracy”—showing how these traditional sites of partisanship can be empowered. The empirical part of the thesis then asks whether such a model can be realised in real-world parties. The main focus is here on the deliberative capacity of organised party members, which is likely the first target of scepticism. I examine three questions, drawing on the findings of a small-scale study of deliberation in party branches in Social Democratic parties in Germany and Austria: (1) Do party branches provide favourable preconditions for deliberation? (2) Are the political discussions in the branches “deliberative”, in the sense that they are marked by respectful exchanges of reasons? (3) When does intra-party deliberation fail? Though mainly indicative, the analysis of the empirical material suggests that party members do possess the deliberative capacity required to realise a deliberative model of intra-party democracy, and that possible deliberative deficiencies can be countervailed using simple institutional fixes. In light of this, the thesis concludes that making parties more internally deliberative in order to reconnect citizens with government is well within reach.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Calvert, Aubin. "Politicizing deliberative democracy : strategic speech in deliberative systems." Thesis, University of British Columbia, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/44807.

Full text
Abstract:
When using language to resolve conflicts and make decisions, people access democratic resources inherent in the practice of communication. Making a claim implicitly appeals to another’s capacity to agree to that claim autonomously—without being coerced or bought, and based on considerations he or she takes to be valid. Deliberative democracy describes political arrangements that harness this potential as the basis for collective decision-making. To the extent that it empowers individuals, however, actors have incentives to use language strategically to influence the very judgments deliberative democrats hope will be governed by carefully weighed reasons. In political contexts, language is often a tool for political ends, bypassing rather than engaging capacities for autonomous judgment. Deliberative democratic theories respond mostly by imposing the normative condition that deliberative speech should not be strategic. But the cost of this normative line is to depoliticize the theory, since it fails to engage much—even most—of the universe of speech in politics. Where democratic institutions channel politics—characterized by conflict and competition—into communication, we should expect speech to be strategic. Yet it is still possible for such speech to underwrite democratic autonomy. To establish a better understanding of strategic speech and its implications for democracy, I develop an analytic framework for conceptualizing the force of language. Under the model of communicative influence, the democratic implications of strategic language use depend not on intentions, but on how language produces pragmatic consequences, shaping the processes by which actors reason towards judgment and action. The model generates propositions about what common features of political communication—narratives, loaded words, and exaggeration, among others—entail for the quality of political judgments. It also systematizes the specific anti-democratic hazards strategic speech that result from the frame-based, subject-based, and institutional ecologies of discourse that condition communicative influence. A democratic theory with analytic capacity around strategic speech can identify institutional interventions into these ecologies that promote autonomous judgment by targeting these specific hazards of strategic speech, without trying to work against the incentives and motivations that make problems political. The result is a politicized theory of deliberative democracy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Flynn, Thomas William. "Debating deliberative democracy : how deliberation changes the way people reason." Thesis, University of York, 2011. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/1466/.

Full text
Abstract:
The concepts of deliberation and deliberative democracy have attracted much attention in political theory over the past twenty years. At first seen as both highly idealised and unreflective of reality, they have now shed this accusation of impracticality, as practitioners and policy makers alike have attempted to institute deliberative principles on a national and international scale. Running alongside this has been the desire to both understand political deliberation and its effects more fully, and to then apply this new information back to deliberative democratic theory. This thesis sits in the latter tradition, presenting an empirical investigation of political deliberation and then discussing how it relates back to deliberative models of democracy. Where it departs from all of the contemporary experimental work, however, is the methodology and conceptual model it is founded upon. Embracing the decision and game theoretic approaches, I develop a three-fold framework to study the effects of deliberation on individual decision-making. After outlining two levels of 'preference' and 'issue', I focus on the third, which I term agency. I then compare a particular case of agency revision, which moves people from individualistic to team reasoning, before developing and putting into action an experimental test of the phenomenon. Finally, I then combine these results with the most recent drive in deliberative democracy towards a systemic approach, and derive an alternative, more positive argument for this recasting.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Wales, Corinne Anne. "Deliberative democracy : toward active citizenship." Thesis, Southampton Solent University, 2000. http://ssudl.solent.ac.uk/1227/.

Full text
Abstract:
Deliberative democratic theory has evolved in response to the perceived limits of liberal democratic theory and practice and offers a challenge to, and a critical perspective from which to judge, contemporary liberal representative institutions. The institution of representation establishes a 'division of labour' between an elite of professional politicians and a passive, privatized citizenry. Deliberative democracy offers the possibility of a different form of that division where increased opportunities for citizen participation are taken to be both feasible and desirable, and citizen engagement forms part of an ongoing critical dialogue upon which more legitimate forms of political authority can be grounded. Underpinning deliberative democratic theory is the idea that our needs and interests may be dialogically interpreted and formed. This takes us away from the notion of the citizen as sole proprieter of private, subjectively formed preferences and provides the imperative for a more public, active conception of citizenship. The work of Jurgen Habarmas is central to deliberative demoratic theory. His distinction between strategic and communicative rationality lies at the heart of the deliberative critique of representative government and in itself provides a useful critical foothold. However, Habermas's procedural conception of discursive legitimacy, though necessary, is not a sufficient condition for a flourishing and vibrant deliberative democracy. This thesis addresses this lacuna in his work, the problem of the mediation of moral pronciples and moral culture, and elaborates a political ethic of philia politike which substantively supplements contemporary deliberative democratic theory. Turning to the question of deliberative democratic institutions, we ask whether deliberative democracy should be seen as an alternative to liberal representative democracy, requiring a complete restructuring lf liberal political institutions, or whether it points to the reform and supplementation of representative structures and practices. We draw learning from the experience of citizens' juries on what may be of value to deliberative democratic theory as well as critically assessing the claim that citizen's juries are viable deliberative institutions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Esperanza, Casullo Maria. "Expanding the borders of democracy deliberative democracy and populism /." Connect to Electronic Thesis (CONTENTdm), 2009. http://worldcat.org/oclc/525166640/viewonline.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

O'Flynn, I. J. "The philosophical basis of deliberative democracy." Thesis, Queen's University Belfast, 2002. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.252599.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Smith, Graham Martin. "Pluralism, deliberative democracy and environmental values." Thesis, University of Southampton, 1997. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.242671.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Benson, Jonathan. "An epistemic theory of deliberative democracy." Thesis, University of Manchester, 2019. https://www.research.manchester.ac.uk/portal/en/theses/an-epistemic-theory-of-deliberative-democracy(6583716a-470d-4b9e-b80e-44a1e71a4ff7).html.

Full text
Abstract:
Democracy has been encountering an increasing number of critics. Whether it comes from a sympathy for autocrats, free-markets, or the more knowledgeable, this increasing democratic scepticism often takes an epistemic form. Democracy's critics argue that democratic procedures and institutions are unlikely to make good decisions or produce good outcomes in terms of justice or the common good, and should, therefore, be restricted if not completely rejected in favour of its more able alternatives. In the face of such scepticism, this thesis develops an epistemic theory of deliberative democracy. This theory has two principal aims. The first is to analyse and define the epistemic properties of deliberative democracy, and the second is to clarify the possible role epistemic values can play in a wider justification of democratic rule. In accordance with the first, the thesis analyses the ability of deliberative democratic institutions to make good or correct decisions in comparison to a broad range of prominent alternatives. These include traditional rivals such as autocracy and aristocracy, but also more modern and less considered alternatives such as free-markets, limited epistocracy and forms of technical calculation. Through these comparisons, it is argued that we have no good or clear epistemic reason to reject democracy. Deliberative democracy is found to be epistemically superior to many of its alternatives and epistemically equivalent to even its best competitors. The thesis, therefore, mounts a strong reply to democracy's epistemic sceptics. The analysis, however, also helps clarify which form of deliberative democracy is epistemically most valuable, pointing to the value systems approaches which give a prominent role to direct citizen deliberation. The epistemic theory of deliberative democracy also aims to clarify what role epistemic values can play in a wider justification of democratic rule. The thesis argues that deliberative democracy is epistemically superior to many of its rivals and no worse epistemically than even its best alternatives. This suggests that although epistemic values cannot mount a stand-alone defence of democracy, democrats would only be required to defend very weak non-epistemic values to produce a mixed justification. Far from being 'rule by the incompetent many' and therefore highly reliant on procedural values, the thesis will demonstrate that epistemic values can carry significant weight in an argument for democratic rule.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Deliberative democracy"

1

Chappell, Zsuzsanna. Deliberative Democracy. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-26544-9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

editor, Palanithurai G., and Gandhigram Rural Institute. Department of Political Science and Development Administration, eds. Deliberative democracy. Chennai: MJP Publishers, 2015.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Warren, Mark. Deliberative democracy. México, D.F: FLACSO, Sede Académica de México, 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

1940-, Elster Jon, ed. Deliberative democracy. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Warren, Mark E., and Hilary Pearse, eds. Designing Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511491177.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Fishkin, James S., and Peter Laslett, eds. Debating Deliberative Democracy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470690734.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

S, Fishkin James, and Laslett Peter, eds. Debating deliberative democracy. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2003.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Rohde, Dorothea. From Deliberative Democracy to Consent Democracy. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzler, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-05921-5.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

He, Baogang, Michael G. Breen, and James S. Fishkin. Deliberative Democracy in Asia. London: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003102441.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Curato, Nicole, Marit Hammond, and John B. Min. Power in Deliberative Democracy. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95534-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Deliberative democracy"

1

Christiano, Thomas, and Sameer Bajaj. "Deliberative Democracy." In A Companion to Applied Philosophy, 383–96. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118869109.ch27.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Fishkin, James S. "Deliberative Democracy." In The Blackwell Guide to Social and Political Philosophy, 221–38. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470756621.ch10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

García-Marzá, Domingo. "Deliberative democracy." In Routledge Handbook of Contemporary European Social Movements, 89–99. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2020. | Series: Routledge international handbooks: Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781351025188-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Cohen, Joshua. "Deliberative Democracy." In Deliberation, Participation and Democracy, 219–36. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230591080_10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Minch, Michael. "Democracy, Deliberative." In Encyclopedia of Global Justice, 233–35. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9160-5_116.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Farrelly, Colin. "Deliberative Democracy." In Justice, Democracy and Reasonable Agreement, 206–22. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230596870_10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Karem, Harem. "Deliberative Democracy." In Cyberdemocracy, 99–122. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27544-9_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Mansbridge, Jane. "“Deliberative Democracy” or “Democratic Deliberation”?" In Deliberation, Participation and Democracy, 251–71. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230591080_12.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Chappell, Zsuzsanna. "Introduction." In Deliberative Democracy, 1–22. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-26544-9_1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Chappell, Zsuzsanna. "Deliberation in Detail." In Deliberative Democracy, 23–45. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-26544-9_2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Deliberative democracy"

1

Velikanov, C. "Direct deliberative democracy." In dg.o '18: 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3209281.3209384.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Simsa, Martin. "HERMENEUTICAL CRITIQUE IN DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY." In 4th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conference on Social Sciences and Arts SGEM2017. Stef92 Technology, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2017/hb21/s06.033.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Alhafnawi, Merihan, Edmund R. Hunt, Severin Lemaignan, Paul O'Dowd, and Sabine Hauert. "Deliberative Democracy with Robot Swarms." In 2022 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iros47612.2022.9981649.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Takahashi, Mitsuru. "REEXAMINING THE DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY: COMMUNITY, ADULT EDUCATION AND DEMOCRACY." In 6th SGEM International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on SOCIAL SCIENCES and ARTS Proceedings. STEF92 Technology, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgemsocial2019v/1.1/s01.007.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Koomen, Marten. "Deliberative Democracy in Educational Assessment Validation." In 2019 AERA Annual Meeting. Washington DC: AERA, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/1434069.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Zakharov, Konstantin P. "Using Ideas Of Deliberative Democracy In Higher Education." In 18th PCSF 2018 - Professional Сulture of the Specialist of the Future. Cognitive-Crcs, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.12.02.180.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

"Modelling sustainability and the role of deliberative democracy." In 19th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand (MSSANZ), Inc., 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.36334/modsim.2011.h2.hartz_karp.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Zawadzka-Pąk, Urszula K., and Paweł Jamróz. "Can Democracy Harm Public Finance? Some Evidences from Europe." In The XX International Scientific Conference "Functioning of Investments Financed from State Resources and from Other Sources in The Countries of Central And Eastern Europe". Temida 2, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.15290/ipf.2022.21.

Full text
Abstract:
James Buchanan and Richard Wagner in their famous book “Democracy in Deficit” note that democracy has not enough fiscal discipline because the citizens’ representatives are chosen in the election and they take the budgetary decisions seeking the re-election. Their theory of public choice may suggest the existence of a positive relationship between the democracy’s quality and the public debt level reflecting the long-lasting consequences of the budgetary decisions of policy-makers. Thus, we formulate the following research question: Is democratic system harmful for public finance? To operationalize the democratic system, we use five democracy indices (i.e., electoral, liberal, participatory, deliberative, and egalitarian), and the public debt to operationalize the threat for public finance. Conclusions put in a new light the theory, as first the study confirmed that there are statistically significant relationships between democracy’s quality and public debt and, however not in case of every democracy index and every European country.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

McKillop, Conor. "Predicting the Outcome of Deliberative Democracy: A Research Proposal." In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Student Research Workshop. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/p19-2013.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Wang, Xifang, and Zhenzhou Wang. "The establishment of community governance structure of Deliberative Democracy." In International Conference on Logistics Engineering, Management and Computer Science (LEMCS 2014). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/lemcs-14.2014.113.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Deliberative democracy"

1

Potts, Tavis, Paul Dargie, Maren Mitchell, Daria Shapovalova, and John Bone. Climate Assemblies and Deliberative Democracy: A Global Best Practice Review. University of Aberdeen, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.57064/2164/23210.

Full text
Abstract:
With climate change policies increasingly used as a tool for further political polarisation, it is important to explore tools that could help bring the public on board with climate ambition. Climate assemblies, if done to a high standard, can increase community empowerment while rebuilding legitimacy within policy-making from the view of the general public. Whilst climate assemblies are important it is also vital to research theoretical approaches as well as real-world experience of climate assemblies to develop better understanding of how assembly outputs can effectively develop and legitimise climate policy and support participatory democracy. This report is developed by the Just Transition Lab at the University of Aberdeen. It is part of the Just Transition Communities Project led by North East Scotland Climate Action Network Hub and funded by the Scottish Government Just Transition Fund. The project plans to explore how communities in the North East Scotland can be involved in and drive the process of designing, creating, and delivering a just transition. This report aims to inform future climate assemblies initiatives, leading to increased community participation in climate change mitigation and adaptation policy. This report provides a literature review as an introduction to deliberative democracy and climate assemblies. It examines theory and practice in all the relevant aspects of using climate assemblies to increase public awareness of climate change, aid climate policy-making, and increasing the legitimacy and public acceptance of current and future policies. From the design of climate assemblies to participant recruitment, scale, and outcomes – this report provides an overview of theoretical approaches and 14 case studies of climate assemblies to present a rounded view of deliberative democracy in practice.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Haider, Huma. Fostering a Democratic Culture: Lessons for the Eastern Neighbourhood. Institute of Development Studies, August 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/k4d.2022.131.

Full text
Abstract:
Political culture is the values, beliefs, and emotions that members of a society express about the political regime and their role in it (Pickering, 2022, p. 5). Norms, values, attitudes and practices considered integral to a “culture of democracy”, according to the Council of Europe, include: a commitment to public deliberation, discussion, and the free expression of opinions; a commitment to electoral rules; the rule of law; and the protection of minority rights; peaceful conflict resolution. The consolidation of democracy involves not only institutional change, but also instilling a democratic culture in a society (Balčytienė, 2021). Research on democratic consolidation in various countries in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) finds that a key impediment to consolidation is the persistence of old, authoritarian political culture that undermines political and civic participation. This rapid review looks at aspects of democratic culture and potential ways to foster it, focusing on educational initiatives and opportunities for civic action — which comprise much of the literature on developing the values, attitudes and behaviours of democracy. Discussion on the strengthening of democratic institutions or assistance to electoral processes is outside the scope of the report.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Deliberative democracy in Lebanon. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD), December 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/daf755e2-en.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Deliberative democracy' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography