Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Deliberation / Books

Books on the topic 'Deliberation'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Deliberation.

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 22 June 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 books for your research on the topic 'Deliberation.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse books on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Flügel-Martinsen, Oliver, Daniel Gaus, Tanja Hitzel-Cassagnes, and Franziska Martinsen, eds. Deliberative Kritik - Kritik der Deliberation. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02860-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Carr, Mark F. Passionate Deliberation. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0591-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

L, Marty Debian, ed. Dialogue & deliberation. Long Grove, Ill: Waveland Press, 2013.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

van, Aaken Anne, List Christian, and Luetge Christoph 1969-, eds. Deliberation and decision: Economics, constitutional theory, and deliberative democracy. Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate, 2004.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Democracy and deliberation. Kenwyn: Juta & Co., 1999.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Rosenberg, Shawn W., ed. Deliberation, Participation and Democracy. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230591080.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Lewiński, Marcin, and Dima Mohammed, eds. Argumentation in Political Deliberation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/bct.76.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Argumentation in political deliberation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2015.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Markets, deliberation and environment. London: Routledge, 2007.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

d'Entrèves, Maurizio Passerin. Legitimacy and democratic deliberation. Manchester: Manchester Centre for Political Thought (MANCEPT), Department of Government, University of Manchester, 1998.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Gastil, John. Political communication and deliberation. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE Publications, 2008.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Passionate deliberation: Emotion, temperance, and the care ethic in clinical moral deliberation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 2003.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Majone, Giandomenico. When does policy deliberation matter? Badia Fiesolana: European University Institute, 1993.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Rhetorical citizenship and public deliberation. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2012.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Bransen, Jan, and Stefaan E. Cuypers, eds. Human Action, Deliberation and Causation. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-5082-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Cislaghi, Beniamino, Diane Gillespie, and Gerry Mackie. Values Deliberation and Collective Action. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33756-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Hendriks, Carolyn M. The Politics of Public Deliberation. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230347564.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Yuan, Cheng. Practical Intellect and Substantial Deliberation. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8651-9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Reber, Bernard. Precautionary Principle, Pluralism and Deliberation. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley &;#38; Sons, Inc., 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781119335931.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Simone, Chambers, and Costain Anne N. 1948-, eds. Deliberation, democracy, and the media. Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2000.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

T, Dillon J., ed. Deliberation in education and society. Norwood, N.J: Ablex Pub. Corp., 1994.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Peter, Fabienne. Democratic legitimacy: Aggregation versus deliberation. New York: Routledge, 2009.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Negotiating diversity: Culture, deliberation, trust. Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2005.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

1958-, Bransen Jan, Cuypers Stefaan E. 1958-, and Utrecht Conference on Human Action and Causality (1996), eds. Human action, deliberation, and causation. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Skyrms, Brian. The dynamics of rational deliberation. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1990.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Tanasoca, Ana. Deliberation Naturalized. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851479.001.0001.

Full text

Abstract:

Democratic theory’s deliberative turn has hit a dead end. It is unable to find a good way to scale up its small-scale, formally organized deliberative mini-publics to include the entire community. Some turn to deliberative systems for a way out, but none have found a credible way to deliberatively involve the citizenry at large. Deliberation Naturalized offers an alternative way out—one we have been using all along. The key sites of democratic deliberation are everyday political conversations among people networked across the community. Informal networked deliberation is how all citizens deliberate together, directly or indirectly. That is how public opinion emerges in civil society. Networked deliberation satisfies the classic deliberative desiderata of inclusion, equality, and reciprocity reasonably well, albeit differently than standard mini-publics. Reconceptualizing democratic deliberation in this way highlights some real threats to the networked mode of deliberative democracy, such as polarization, message repetition, and pluralistic ignorance. Deliberation Naturalized assesses the extent of each of those threats and proposes ways of protecting real existing deliberative democracy against them. By focusing on the mechanisms underpinning every democratic deliberation among citizens, Deliberation Naturalized offers a truly novel approach to deliberative democracy.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Talisse, Robert B. Deliberation. Oxford University Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376692.013.0011.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Deliberation Naturalized: Improving Real Existing Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2020.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Ackerman, Bruce A., and James S. Fishkin. Deliberation Day. Yale University Press, 2004.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Myers, C. Daniel, and Tali Mendelberg. Political Deliberation. Oxford University Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199760107.013.0022.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Fishkin, James S., and Bruce Ackerman. Deliberation Day. Yale University Press, 2010.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Gauthier, David. Rational Deliberation. Edited by Susan Dimock, Claire Finkelstein, and Christopher W. Morris. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192842992.001.0001.

Full text

Abstract:

A collection of David Gauthier’s writings on practical rationality and deliberation, all but two written after Morals by Agreement (1986). They represent the author’s most important contributions to the theory of practical reason, moving some distance from the view first presented in “Reason and Maximization” (1975) and developed in a much-reprinted chapter of Morals by Agreement (1986). These essays will make Gauthier’s more recent essays on rationality available to a wider audience, will change common misconceptions of his revisionist views, and will address many of the concerns of his critics, including himself.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Ackerman, Bruce, and James S. Fishkin. Deliberation Day. Yale University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.12987/9780300127027.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Contemplation, Deliberation. AuthorHouse, 2022.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Ackerman, Bruce A., and James S. Fishkin. Deliberation Day. Yale University Press, 2008.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Ackerman, Bruce A., and James S. Fishkin. Deliberation Day. Yale University Press, 2005.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Contemplation, Deliberation. AuthorHouse, 2022.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Blaine, Destiny. Deliberation Plantation. Siren-BookStrand, Incorporated, 2012.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Bächtiger, André, and John Parkinson. Mapping and Measuring Deliberation. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199672196.001.0001.

Full text

Abstract:

Deliberative democracy has challenged two widely accepted nostrums about democratic politics: that people lack the capacities for effective self-government; and that democratic procedures are arbitrary and do not reflect popular will; indeed, that the idea of popular will is itself illusory. On the contrary, deliberative democrats have shown that people are capable of being sophisticated, creative problem solvers, given the right opportunities in the right kinds of democratic institutions. But deliberative empirical research has its own problems. In this book two leading deliberative scholars review decades of that research and reveal three important issues. First, the concept ‘deliberation’ has been inflated so much as to lose empirical bite; second, deliberation has been equated with entire processes of which it is just one feature; and third, such processes are confused with democracy in a deliberative mode more generally. In other words, studies frequently apply micro-level tools and concepts to make macro- and meso-level judgements, and vice versa. Instead, Bächtiger and Parkinson argue that deliberation must be understood as contingent, performative, and distributed. They argue that deliberation needs to be disentangled from other communicative modes; that appropriate tools need to be deployed at the right level of analysis; and that scholars need to be clear about whether they are making additive judgements or summative ones. They then apply that understanding to set out a new agenda and new empirical tools for deliberative empirical scholarship at the micro, meso, and macro levels.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Brownstein, Michael. Deliberation and Spontaneity. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190633721.003.0006.

Full text

Abstract:

This chapter argues that in some contexts, deliberation may have a limited role to play in making our spontaneous reactions more virtuous. The chapter begins by considering the arguments of Peter Railton, and Nomy Arpaly and Timothy Schroeder, that deliberation cannot be foundational for action. Then, the chapter examines cases in which agents appear to act ethically in spite of their deliberative reasoning. Even perfect deliberation can undermine ethical action, the chapter argues. In the case of overcoming implicit bias, the relationship between spontaneity and deliberation is fraught too. Even when deliberation appears to be playing a central role in guiding our decisions and behavior, things may be considerably more complicated.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Mapping and Measuring Deliberation: Towards a New Deliberative Quality. Oxford University Press, 2019.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Aaken, Anne van, and Christian List. Deliberation and Decision: Economics, Constitutional Theory and Deliberative Democracy. Taylor & Francis Group, 2017.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Aaken, Anne van, and Christian List. Deliberation and Decision: Economics, Constitutional Theory and Deliberative Democracy. Taylor & Francis Group, 2017.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Aaken, Anne van, and Christian List. Deliberation and Decision: Economics, Constitutional Theory and Deliberative Democracy. Taylor & Francis Group, 2018.

Find full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Goodin, Robert E., and Kai Spiekermann. Discussion and Deliberation. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198823452.003.0009.

Full text

Abstract:

Virtually all of our knowledge is second-hand, learned from others. In ideal deliberative settings, such as Habermas’s ‘ideal speech situation’, learning from others works well because participants are challenged to provide evidence and be consistent in their arguments. Not all real-world deliberation lives up to such high standards, but even non-ideal deliberation can be epistemically advantageous. We investigate five ways how: by improving voter competence; by reducing positive correlation; by incentivizing more sincere voting; by making the decision problem more truth-conducive; and by changing the decision problem in epistemically beneficial ways. The chapter ends with the conjecture that the ‘Deliberation Effect’ will boost group competence at least a little.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Schueler, G. F. Deliberation and Desire. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199370962.003.0012.

Full text

Abstract:

It seems very plausible that actions are done as a result of the agent’s desire for something. At the same time we sometimes act on the basis of our practical deliberation. But it is hard to fit these thoughts together. Reasoning on the basis of the thought “I want phi” can take place whether or not this premise is true. It would be the same even if this thought were false, in which case the explanation of the resulting action would be the same even if the agent did not actually want phi. At the same time, if one acts on the basis of one’s deliberation it seems to follow that one wanted whatever it was one was aiming at. So apparently in this case the thought “I want phi” must be true, even self-verifying. This paper proposes a solution to these puzzles.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Aaken, Anne van. Deliberation and Decision. Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315258256.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Patterson, Annabel. Democracy and Deliberation. Yale University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.12987/9780300156683.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Fishkin, James S. Making Deliberation Practical. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198820291.003.0003.

Full text

Abstract:

Eight criteria are discussed for microcosms or mini-publics that can offer input to policy. These include demographic and attitudinal representativeness, sample size, the opportunity to engage policy arguments for and against proposals for action, knowledge gain, opinion change, distortions from polarization and domination by the more advantaged, and whether there are identifiable reasons for the final considered judgments. These criteria are applied in depth to four case studies from different parts of the world: California (on a statewide basis), the city of Ulaanbaatar (capital of Mongolia), two projects in Uganda (in Bududa and Butaleja), and a European-wide Deliberative Poll in Brussels engaging a sample from all twenty-seven countries deliberating in twenty-two languages. These four cases illustrate the prospects and challenges of applying Deliberative Polling to specific policy choices. They illustrate different entry points for the considered judgments of the public. Both qualitative and quantitative data are considered in each project.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Quirk, Paul J., and William Bendix. Deliberation in Congress. Oxford University Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199559947.003.0024.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!