Relevant bibliographies by topics / Deliberation

Academic literature on the topic 'Deliberation'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 22 June 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Contents

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Deliberation.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Deliberation"

1

De Brasi, Leandro, and Claudio Gutierrez. "Anonymity and Asynchronicity as Key Design Dimensions for the Reciprocity of Online Democratic Deliberation." International Journal of Applied Philosophy 34, no. 2 (2020): 183–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/ijap2021322143.

Full text
Abstract:
The aim of this paper is to identify, given certain democratic normative standards regarding deliberation, some pros as well as cons of possible online deliberation designs due to variations in two key design dimensions: namely, asynchronicity and anonymity. In particular, we consider one crucial aspect of deliberative argumentation: namely, its reciprocity, which puts interaction centre stage to capture the back-and-forth of reasons. More precisely, we focus on two essential features of the deliberative interaction: namely, its listening widely and listening carefully. We conclude that one sort of online deliberation that combines the two design features of anonymity and asynchronicity is likely to better promote the reciprocity required for democratic deliberation than both natural and designed offline deliberations (such as the designed deliberation in Deliberative Polling) and online simulations of them.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Holdo, Markus. "Meta-deliberation: everyday acts of critical reflection in deliberative systems." Politics 40, no. 1 (March 26, 2019): 106–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263395719837914.

Full text
Abstract:
The term ‘meta-deliberation’ refers to processes of addressing problems with the way that conversations about shared concerns – our ordinary deliberations – proceed. This article discusses the distinction between meta-deliberation and ordinary deliberation and examines three questions raised by previous arguments about meta-deliberation: (1) what kinds of communication should count as meta-deliberation, (2) does meta-deliberation always lead to reflective understanding and improvements in practices of deliberation, and (3) why would deliberative systems need meta-deliberation? Consistent with the systemic perspective on deliberation, this article suggests an inclusive view of which acts and sites may contribute to processes of meta-deliberation: it argues that meta-deliberation faces the same potential problems as ordinary deliberation, such as unequal power relations and narrow perspectives, and therefore requires careful examination; but when meta-deliberation works, it provides societies with reflective capacity, which helps them locate systemic weaknesses. The article concludes by discussing how further studies can help make meta-deliberation more inclusive in order to serve system-level critical reflection.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Ebeling, Martin, and Fabio Wolkenstein. "Exercising Deliberative Agency in Deliberative Systems." Political Studies 66, no. 3 (September 29, 2017): 635–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0032321717723514.

Full text
Abstract:
At the heart of the ideal of deliberative democracy lies an emphasis on the political autonomy of citizens participating in procedures of public justification aimed at the promotion of the common good. The recent systemic turn in deliberative democracy has moved so far away from this ideal that it relegates the deliberations of citizens to a secondary matter, legitimising forms of rule that may even undermine the normative impulses central to the project of deliberative democracy. We critically discuss this theoretical development and show how deliberative agency can effectively be exercised in complex political systems. We argue, in particular, that political parties play a central role in facilitating the exercise of deliberative agency, fostering deliberation among citizens and linking their deliberations to decisions. Instead of giving up on the possibility that citizens participate in procedures of public justification, deliberative democrats should look to parties’ unique ability to enable deliberation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Filatova, Olga, Yury Kabanov, and Yuri Misnikov. "Public Deliberation in Russia: Deliberative Quality, Rationality and Interactivity of the Online Media Discussions." Media and Communication 7, no. 3 (August 9, 2019): 133–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i3.1925.

Full text
Abstract:
Deliberation research is now undergoing two emerging trends: deliberation is shifting from offline to online, as well as from an inherently democratic concept to the one applicable to less competitive regimes (He & Warren, 2011). The goal of this article is to study the peculiarities of deliberative practices in hybrid regimes, taking online discourse on the Russian anti-sanctions policy as a case. We use the Habermasian concept of basic validity claims to assess deliberation quality through the lens of argumentation and interactivity. Our findings suggest that deliberative practices can exist in non-competitive contexts and non-institutionalized digital spaces, in the form of intersubjective solidarities resulting from the everyday political talk among ordinary citizens. Such deliberations can be counted as argumentative discourses, although in a special, casual way—unlike the procedural rule-based debates. Generally, as in established liberal democracies, deliberation in Russia tends to attract like-minded participants. While the argumentative quality does not seem to vary across the discussion threads sample, the level of deliberative interactivity is higher on pro-government media, accompanied with the higher level of incivility. On the other hand, discourses on independent media are distinctively against the government policy of food destruction. The democratic value of such deliberations is unclear and might depend on the political allegiance and ownership of the media. Though some discourses can be considered democratic, their impact on decision-making remains minimal, which is a key constraint of deliberation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Uhr, John. "Testing Deliberative Democracy: The 1999 Australian Republic Referendum." Government and Opposition 35, no. 2 (April 2000): 189–210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1477-7053.00023.

Full text
Abstract:
THIS ARTICLE EXAMINES AUSTRALIAN REFERENDUM PRACTICE WITH the aim of contributing to the growing international debate over concepts of deliberative democracy, defined in terms of democratic regimes structured to maximize community deliberation in public decision-making. Theories of deliberative democracy go beyond earlier approaches to participatory democracy by specifying in greater detail the nature of the deliberative process in which citizens should be able to participate and of the importance of institutions of civil society to an effective deliberative process. The focus on ideals of public deliberation ref lects the ambition of deliberative democrats (the ‘deliberati’ if you will) to ground political decision-making in norms of shared public reason. Where earlier approaches to participatory democracy investigated rights to political participation, current approaches to deliberative democracy also investigate responsibilities of political participants – particularly responsibilities to comply with norms of rational political deliberation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Siu, Alice. "Deliberation & the Challenge of Inequality." Daedalus 146, no. 3 (July 2017): 119–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00451.

Full text
Abstract:
Deliberative critics contend that because societal inequalities cannot be bracketed in deliberative settings, the deliberative process inevitably perpetuates these inequalities. As a result, they argue, deliberation does not serve its theorized purposes, but rather produces distorted dialogue determined by inequalities, not merits. Advocates of deliberation must confront these criticisms: do less-privileged, less-educated, or perhaps illiterate participants stand a chance in discussions with the more privileged, better educated, and well spoken? Could their arguments ever be perceived or weighed equally? This essay presents empirical evidence to demonstrate that, in deliberations that are structured to provide a more level playing field, inequalities in skill and status do not translate into inequalities of influence.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Schauer, Frederick, and Bruce Ackerman. "Deliberating about Deliberation." Michigan Law Review 90, no. 6 (May 1992): 1187. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1289406.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Tong, Dezhi, and Baogang He. "How democratic are Chinese grassroots deliberations? An empirical study of 393 deliberation experiments in China." Japanese Journal of Political Science 19, no. 4 (December 2018): 630–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1468109918000269.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractChinese public hearings or consultations have been subject to numerous debates, doubts, and scepticism about the existence of Chinese deliberative democracy. More empirical evidence, however, is required about these debates before we can offer any meaningful account of the nature, characteristics, and direction of Chinese deliberation. In addition, although there have been many case studies on grassroots deliberative democracy, such studies are intellectually isolated from each other in the sense that they do not comprise a statistical unit. To overcome this deficiency, we developed a new research method for studying grassroots deliberation by collecting and validating the existing case studies, thereby making them a statistical unit. This paper aims to offer a big-picture perspective and the national statistical trend behind the uneven development of grassroots deliberative democracy. It develops an intellectual framework to assess whether grassroots deliberation is democratic. By collecting, validating, and coding 393 cases of Chinese grassroots deliberations, we have assessed Chinese grassroots deliberation, confirmed the cases’ democratic attributes, and provided a solid statistical result. Although there is strong evidence to support the claim that these grassroots deliberation experiments are democratic, there remain some variations, nuances, and shortcomings. The full picture is not simple, but instead provides a mixed perspective.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Di Mauro, Danilo, and Irena Fiket. "Debating Europe, transforming identities: assessing the impact of deliberative poll treatment on identity." Italian Political Science Review/Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica 47, no. 3 (January 16, 2017): 267–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2016.26.

Full text
Abstract:
Although there is a considerable amount of talk about transformative power of deliberation on identity, the debate in literature remains highly theoretical in underlying the benefits of deliberative model for EU Integration. So far, little empirical evidence is available on the actual impact of deliberation.Can deliberation enhance European identity?We specifically address this question by using deliberative polling quasi-experiment that involved random sample of 348 European citizens in 2 days deliberationon issuesof Europeanconcern.The comparison of citizens’ sense of belonging to both EU and nation states before and after deliberation, allowed us to explore the effects of deliberation on identity and further test it against the control group. The analyses show that when European citizens are enabled to deliberate on European issues beyond national borders their exclusive national identity decreases and they become more community minded. The observed transformation of identities is further analyzed in order to explore the relationship between European and national identity. The analyses indicate that even after deliberative treatment in which European identity has been activated the relationship between multiple identities remains compatible.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Akgül, Çiğdem Görgün, and Musa Akgül. "Patterns of the Parliamentary Debates: How Deliberative are Turkish Democratic Opening Debates?" Politics in Central Europe 18, no. 2 (June 1, 2022): 175–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/pce-2022-0008.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract This study attempts to measure the deliberation quality of the Democratic Opening Debates in the Turkish Parliament through the Discourse Quality Index (DQI). The majority of studies have been conducted on the deliberation quality of relatively homogenised and developed Western societies and on less conflictual or contentious topics. In these countries, democratic culture has been institutionalised. On the contrary, Turkey is a developing country and has been going through an ethnic conflict involving violence for many decades. Thus, this case study aims to make an original contribution to empirical deliberation studies. Researchers have examined the 88-page stenographic records of the Democratic Opening Debates and put forward a DQI score. According to the findings, the controversial debates fulfill only 40% of high-level deliberative discourse ethics. This result demonstrates that the ideal deliberation process does not exist in Turkey even though a convenient atmosphere is created for deliberations by means of official procedures. Ethnic division in the society has a profoundly negative impact on the quality of deliberations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Deliberation"

1

Chappell, Zsuzsanna. "Deliberation disputed : a critique of deliberative democracy." Thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London), 2008. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/2340/.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis critically re-examines deliberative democracy from a rational and social-choice-theoretic perspective and questions its dominance in current democratic theory. I define deliberative democracy as reasoned, inclusive, equal and other-regarding debate aimed at making decisions collectively. The thesis examines both procedural and epistemic justifications for deliberative democracy. Procedural justifications are based on the normative values that underpin the theory of deliberative democracy: reasoned debate, equality and inclusion. The epistemic justification of deliberative democracy states that it will arrive at better outcomes or the truth more often than other democratic procedures. I conclude that the justifications offered for the claim that the model of deliberative democracy is superior to other models of democracy are not solid enough to warrant the strength of the conclusions presented in the literature. The thesis also examines whether deliberation is likely to produce the positive consequences that its proponents ascribe to it by using findings from deliberative experiments, political science, psychology and other social sciences. I find that many assumptions about human nature and motivation that deliberative democrats make cannot be supported by empirical evidence. They do not sufficiently consider problems of instrumental rationality, cognitive limitations, self-interested behaviour and a lack of motivation to participate in highly resource intensive activities. Furthermore, the model of deliberative democracy is based on a very particular conception of politics. This conception is somewhat apolitical, requires a high level of popular participation and conflicts with other, more adversarial or interest-based conceptions of politics. Through these findings I challenge the dominant position of deliberative democracy in the current literature on democratic theory and argue in favour of a more comprehensive theory of democracy that puts more emphasis on other democratic mechanisms, such as representation or interest group politics.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Leven, Felicia. "Deliberation i klassrummet? : En studie om det deliberativa samtalet i skolans klassrum utifrån ett deliberativt demokratiperspektiv." Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, 2017. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-317176.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Flynn, Thomas William. "Debating deliberative democracy : how deliberation changes the way people reason." Thesis, University of York, 2011. http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/1466/.

Full text
Abstract:
The concepts of deliberation and deliberative democracy have attracted much attention in political theory over the past twenty years. At first seen as both highly idealised and unreflective of reality, they have now shed this accusation of impracticality, as practitioners and policy makers alike have attempted to institute deliberative principles on a national and international scale. Running alongside this has been the desire to both understand political deliberation and its effects more fully, and to then apply this new information back to deliberative democratic theory. This thesis sits in the latter tradition, presenting an empirical investigation of political deliberation and then discussing how it relates back to deliberative models of democracy. Where it departs from all of the contemporary experimental work, however, is the methodology and conceptual model it is founded upon. Embracing the decision and game theoretic approaches, I develop a three-fold framework to study the effects of deliberation on individual decision-making. After outlining two levels of 'preference' and 'issue', I focus on the third, which I term agency. I then compare a particular case of agency revision, which moves people from individualistic to team reasoning, before developing and putting into action an experimental test of the phenomenon. Finally, I then combine these results with the most recent drive in deliberative democracy towards a systemic approach, and derive an alternative, more positive argument for this recasting.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Tomm, Jonathan Michael. "Deliberation in anarchy." Thesis, University of British Columbia, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/51645.

Full text
Abstract:
How do cooperative rules and agreements emerge in anarchical situations of political conflict between or within states? This dissertation responds to this question by developing an innovative theory of the role that deliberation plays in the emergence of rule-based cooperation under anarchy. “Deliberation” refers to a kind of political talk in which participants attempt to persuade each other on the basis of convincing reasons. Deliberation promises to be an important vehicle through which political opponents make and follow cooperative rules together. The problem, however, is that because deliberation has primarily been studied in the context of strong, liberal-democratic states, we do not yet have an adequate understanding of how it can be effective under more anarchical conditions. Without the security provided by strong institutions and relatively thick “lifeworlds” of shared culture and norms, deliberative responses to politics are more likely to be scuttled by mistrust and mutual suspicion. The theory developed here addresses this challenge by highlighting and investigating the often-overlooked relational effects of deliberation. Deliberation is not just about the content of the reasons political opponents offer one another. It is also about the fact that they are offering reasons at all, and about what that implies for the kind of actions they can expect from each other. Most importantly, deliberation can be a way for interlocutors to demonstrate their accountability to each other: their willingness to uphold, and count on others to uphold, shared standards of behaviour. In this way deliberation can help to generate the bonds of trust and mutually acknowledged commitment that political opponents need in order to act on shared rules and understandings. In developing this theory, the dissertation offers new conceptual tools for understanding how productive politics, based on negotiation, persuasion, and shared rules, can get a toehold even under difficult conditions.
Arts, Faculty of
Political Science, Department of
Graduate
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

De, Kenessey Brendan. "Joint practical deliberation." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/113783.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, 2017.
Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 175-181).
Joint practical deliberation is the activity of deciding together what to do. In this dissertation, I argue that several speech acts that we can use to alter our moral obligations - promises, offers, requests, demands, commands, and agreements - are moves within joint practical deliberation. The dissertation begins by investigating joint practical deliberation. The resulting account implies that joint deliberation is more flexible than we usually recognize, in two ways. First, we can make joint decisions not only about what we will do together, but also about what you or I will do alone. Second, we can deliberate by means of two distinct methods: propose-and-ratify, in which a proposed joint decision must be explicitly accepted to come into effect, and propose-and-challenge, in which a proposed joint decision comes into force unless it is explicitly challenged. Varying these parameters generates a botany of different kinds of proposals we can make within joint deliberation. When we look at these proposals more closely, we make a surprising discovery: for each kind of proposal we can make in joint practical deliberation, there is an everyday speech act with the very same properties. A certain kind of proposal to make a joint decision regarding one's own actions has the same normative effects, under the same conditions, as a promise. One kind of proposal to make a joint decision regarding one's addressee's actions has all the essential features of a command; another kind of deliberative proposal - with the same content but a different method of evaluation - looks exactly like a request. And so on. These similarities are too systematic to be coincidental. The only explanation, I argue, is that these ordinary speech acts are identical to their doppelgangers within joint practical deliberation. Promises and offers are proposals to make joint decisions about what I will do. Commands, demands, and requests are proposals to make joint decisions about whatyou will do. And agreements are joint decisions about what we will do. Call this the deliberative theory of these speech acts. Considering each speech act in turn, I defend the deliberative theory by arguing that it provides a uniquely powerful explanation of its targets' social and moral significance. Once we see how naturally these speech acts fall out of our practice of joint deliberation, theories that treat them as sui genens - as many moral philosophers now do - will come to seem redundant and nonexplanatory. Conversely, thinking of promises, offers, commands, demands, requests, and agreements as moves within joint practical deliberation allows us to give an elegant and generative theory of these phenomena that have confounded moral philosophers for so long.
by Brendan de Kenessey.
Ph. D.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Min, Seong Jae. "Deliberation, East Meets West: Exploring the Cultural Dimension of Citizen Deliberation." The Ohio State University, 2009. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1243277918.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Min, Seong-Jae. "Deliberation, east meets west exploring the cultural dimension of citizen deliberation /." Columbus, Ohio : Ohio State University, 2009. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc%5Fnum=osu1243277918.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

MUHAMMAD, IRFAN. "Comparative Political Philosophy and Political Deliberation: An Exploration of Deliberative Practices in Pakistan." Doctoral thesis, Luiss Guido Carli, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/11385/201067.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis attempts to explore deliberative practices in Pakistan. In doing so, it draws on and extends the literature produced under two relatively new academic fields—the fields of deliberative theory and comparative political philosophy—which are gaining prominence in the academic world. Although these two academic fields appear quite different but this thesis argues that they are not only complimentary but can also benefit each other in their further theoretical development. In order to show this complimentary relationship between deliberative theory and comparative political philosophy, this thesis explores deliberative practices in an authoritarian non-Western context. More specifically, it explores the role of deliberation in the democratization of Pakistan. This thesis analyzes the case of Pakistan Lawyers’ Movement during the military dictatorship (2007-2009) and how it paved the way to the process of democratization in the country. Although democratization of societies at large has always been at the core of deliberative theory, but comparative studies of democratization have completely missed the deliberative aspect which makes transition to democracy possible. Through Dryzek’s concept of deliberative capacity, this thesis investigates the role of Pakistan Lawyers’ Movement in building this capacity across different locations in the political system. The concept of deliberative capacity is being used in the larger context of systemic turn in deliberative theory. This latest trend helps us to study deliberation at a macro level and is not specifically tied to liberal institutional arrangements of states in the West. This thesis attempts to interpret Pakistan Lawyers’ Movement through the lens of deliberative theory. Pakistan Lawyers’ Movement throws new light on the normative aspects of deliberative theory and also helps us to understand the nature of deliberation in Pakistani context. The case of Pakistan Lawyers’ Movement provokes reflection on normative principles of deliberative democracy, helps us understand the nature of deliberation in an authoritarian context, extends current scholarship on the comparative studies of democratization by spelling out the deliberative potential of the regime, and contributes to the ongoing debate on comparative political philosophy as an academic field in the age of globalization.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Novaes, Flávio Santos. "Se Conselho fosse bom... A efetividade deliberativa de conselhos municipais de habitação na Bahia." Escola de Administração da Universidade Federal da Bahia, 2016. http://repositorio.ufba.br/ri/handle/ri/21428.

Full text
Abstract:
Submitted by Tatiana Lima (tatianasl@ufba.br) on 2016-10-11T20:53:21Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Novaes, Flávio Santos.pdf: 1569915 bytes, checksum: e2ec2286f432c8c17766d42d09e1b7f5 (MD5)
Approved for entry into archive by Tatiana Lima (tatianasl@ufba.br) on 2017-02-15T19:03:55Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 Novaes, Flávio Santos.pdf: 1569915 bytes, checksum: e2ec2286f432c8c17766d42d09e1b7f5 (MD5)
Made available in DSpace on 2017-02-15T19:03:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Novaes, Flávio Santos.pdf: 1569915 bytes, checksum: e2ec2286f432c8c17766d42d09e1b7f5 (MD5)
Esta pesquisa analisa a efetividade deliberativa de conselhos gestores de habitação em três municípios baianos: Salvador, Vitória da Conquista e Camaçari. Para tanto, recorre a técnicas qualitativas como entrevistas, pesquisa documental e observação, e se classifica como um estudo de caso múltiplo. O estudo discute os limites da democracia representativa brasileira, ainda com traços autoritários, conservadores e centralizadores do Estado, apesar dos esforços de movimentos sociais e de gestores públicos para ultrapassá-los, introduzindo instituições participativas na gestão pública. Para compreender os meios de ampliação da democracia representativa e o papel que os conselhos municipais de habitação podem exercer, este estudo utiliza conceitos como democracia participativa e deliberativa, deliberação pública e efetividade deliberativa. O objetivo é avaliar a efetividade deliberativa dos conselhos municipais de habitação, mediante a deliberação, aprovação e fiscalização de políticas públicas que supostamente contribuiriam para a universalização do direito à moradia e a solução de sérios problemas habitacionais dos municípios. Foram utilizadas categorias de análise como o contexto de criação desses fóruns e a ação da gestão municipal para assegurar seu caráter deliberativo, a ação de representantes da sociedade civil nas discussões e deliberações, a influência de interesses do capital imobiliário e da construção civil sobre as políticas municipais de habitação, e os efeitos das políticas habitacionais das esferas federal e estadual sobre as políticas municipais e os seus conselhos. Os resultados da pesquisa indicam que os conselhos de habitação não apresentam efetividade deliberativa na universalização do acesso à moradia de interesse social, pois carecem do apoio de gestões municipais, que não liberam recursos financeiros para os fundos de habitação, não convocam regularmente as reuniões ou não implementam integralmente suas deliberações. Os conselhos gestores e as políticas locais de habitação sofrem a influência indireta de interesses do capital imobiliário e da construção civil, interessados em projetos padronizados e de grande porte, a despeito de projetos diversificados de requalificação urbana em comunidades carentes. Os conselhos de habitação também perdem sua capacidade deliberativa quando os municípios dependem de transferências de recursos e se resumem à mera operacionalização de políticas habitacionais aprovadas por outros entes da federação. Assim, o caráter deliberativo dos conselhos de habitação é comprometido pelos resquícios autoritários e centralizadores do Estado brasileiro, pelo controle desses fóruns por representantes da gestão municipal, nem sempre comprometidos com sua democratização e com o seu fortalecimento, revelando uma assimetria de poder e de recursos, o despreparo técnico e político de conselheiros que representam segmentos da sociedade civil. Esses fatores impedem o avanço em direção a uma democracia participativa ou deliberativa, configurando o que conceituo como pós-participativismo na gestão pública.
This research analyzes the deliberative effectiveness of housing councils in three municipalities in Bahia: Salvador, Vitoria da Conquista and Camaçari. In order to accomplish this, it uses qualitative techniques such as interviews, documentary research and observation, and is classified as a multiple case study. This study discusses the limits of Brazilian representative democracy, still with authoritarian traits, conservative and centralized state, despite the efforts of social movements and public managers to overcome them, introducing participatory institutions in public administration. To understand the expansion of means of representative democracy and the role that municipal housing councils can exercise, this study uses concepts such as participatory and deliberative democracy, public deliberation and deliberative effectiveness. The objective is to evaluate the deliberative effectiveness of housing councils through deliberation, approval and monitoring of public policies that supposedly contribute to the universal right to housing and the solution of serious housing problems of municipalities. Further, categories of analysis were used as the context of creating these forums and the action of municipal management to ensure its deliberative character, the action of civil society counselors in their discussions and deliberations, the influence of interests of real estate capital on municipal housing policies, and the effects of housing policies at the federal and state levels on municipal policies and their councils. In addition, research results indicate that housing councils do not have deliberative effectiveness in universal access to housing of social interest because they lack the support of municipal administrations, which do not release budget for housing funds, do not regularly convene meetings or do not fully implement its deliberations. The management councils and local housing policies suffer the indirect influence of real estate capital interested in standard designs and large scale projects, despite diverse projects of urban regeneration in disadvantaged communities. Also, Housing councils lose their deliberative capacity when municipalities rely on funds transfers and reduce to mere operationalization of housing policies adopted by other federal entities. Thus, the deliberative character of housing councils is committed by Brazil's authoritarian remnants; the control of these forums by representatives of the municipal administration, not always compromised to democratization and its strengthening, revealing an asymmetry of power and resources, and civil society counselor’s lack of technical and political skills. These factors thwart progress toward a participatory or deliberative democracy, setting up what I conceptualize as ‘pós-participativismo’ in public management.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Siedschlag, Alexander. "Digitale Demokratie : Netzpolitik und Deliberation." Universität Potsdam, 2005. http://opus.kobv.de/ubp/texte_eingeschraenkt_welttrends/2010/4798/.

Full text
Abstract:
Academics have been arguing about the political and social changes initiated by communication technologies for more than hundred years. Internet-politics does not have the potential to form a new digital culture of deliberation. The existing background of communication culture is a very important variable which has not been incorporated before. The author suggests five different concepts of politics based on the internet. The model of digital democracy provides a basis for exploring the interconnection between internetbased politics and change in political and communication culture. Digital democracy has the potential to make a difference in public deliberation; however, it needs concerned elites and prudent governance.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Books on the topic "Deliberation"

1

Flügel-Martinsen, Oliver, Daniel Gaus, Tanja Hitzel-Cassagnes, and Franziska Martinsen, eds. Deliberative Kritik - Kritik der Deliberation. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02860-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Carr, Mark F. Passionate Deliberation. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0591-3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

L, Marty Debian, ed. Dialogue & deliberation. Long Grove, Ill: Waveland Press, 2013.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

van, Aaken Anne, List Christian, and Luetge Christoph 1969-, eds. Deliberation and decision: Economics, constitutional theory, and deliberative democracy. Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate, 2004.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Democracy and deliberation. Kenwyn: Juta & Co., 1999.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Rosenberg, Shawn W., ed. Deliberation, Participation and Democracy. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230591080.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Lewiński, Marcin, and Dima Mohammed, eds. Argumentation in Political Deliberation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/bct.76.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Argumentation in political deliberation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2015.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Markets, deliberation and environment. London: Routledge, 2007.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

d'Entrèves, Maurizio Passerin. Legitimacy and democratic deliberation. Manchester: Manchester Centre for Political Thought (MANCEPT), Department of Government, University of Manchester, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Deliberation"

1

Mansbridge, Jane. "“Deliberative Democracy” or “Democratic Deliberation”?" In Deliberation, Participation and Democracy, 251–71. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230591080_12.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Smigelskis, David J. "Deliberation (and topics): Cultivating Deliberating." In A Companion to Rhetoric and Rhetorical Criticism, 190–205. Malden, MA, USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470999851.ch12.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Gracia, Diego. "Deliberation." In Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics, 813–18. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_135.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Gracia, Diego. "Deliberation." In Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics, 1–9. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_135-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Gracia, Diego. "Deliberation." In Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics, 1–8. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_135-2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Kloß, Andrea. "Deliberation." In Deliberative Offenheit durch Empathie, 9–21. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-32435-3_2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

De Brasi, Leandro. "Deliberation." In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible, 1–7. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98390-5_198-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

ten Have, Henk, and Maria do Céu Patrão Neves. "Deliberation." In Dictionary of Global Bioethics, 393–94. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54161-3_192.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Decker, Juilee. "Deliberation." In Fallen Monuments and Contested Memorials, 200–204. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003256076-16.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

De Brasi, Leandro. "Deliberation." In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of the Possible, 362–69. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90913-0_198.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Deliberation"

1

Mehra, Kanav, Nanda Kishore Sreenivas, and Kate Larson. "Deliberation and Voting in Approval-Based Multi-Winner Elections." In Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-23}. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2023/318.

Full text
Abstract:
Citizen-focused democratic processes where participants deliberate on alternatives and then vote to make the final decision are increasingly popular today. While the computational social choice literature has extensively investigated voting rules, there is limited work that explicitly looks at the interplay of the deliberative process and voting. In this paper, we build a deliberation model using established models from the opinion-dynamics literature and study the effect of different deliberation mechanisms on voting outcomes achieved when using well-studied voting rules. Our results show that deliberation generally improves welfare and representation guarantees, but the results are sensitive to how the deliberation process is organized. We also show, experimentally, that simple voting rules, such as approval voting, perform as well as more sophisticated rules such as proportional approval voting or method of equal shares if deliberation is properly supported. This has ramifications on the practical use of such voting rules in citizen-focused democratic processes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Hanák, Róbert. "Are Deliberative People More Consistent in Decision Making?" In Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics Conference. AHFE International, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.54941/ahfe100187.

Full text
Abstract:
The preference for intuition and deliberation scale (PID) as a cognitive style measure was used to investigate whether more deliberative participants (identified by self-report PID inventory) would also show higher motivation to properly and normatively solve a task designed to measure their inconsistency and discrimination to details (CWS Index). 161 (103 women) managers and administrative workers were asked to evaluate 21 fictional job candidates. The decision task was designed so that participants could work according to their preferences – everyone had enough time to analyse the logic behind the task. Significant differences were found among all four groups (deliberative, intuitive, both below median, both above median) in levels of inconsistency. Totally consistent respondents were significantly more likely to be from the deliberative and mixed (high in deliberation and in intuition) groups.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Robertson, Scott P. "Digital deliberation." In the 2006 national conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1146598.1146656.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Jiang, Yifei, Du Li, Guang Yang, Qin Lv, and Zhigang Liu. "Deliberation for intuition." In the 13th international conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2030112.2030156.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Dastani, Mehdi, Frank de Boer, Frank Dignum, and John-Jules Meyer. "Programming agent deliberation." In the second international joint conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/860575.860592.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Walker, Marilyn A. "Discourse and deliberation." In the 15th conference. Morristown, NJ, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.3115/991250.991347.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Carcasson, Martín. "The Cycle of Deliberative Inquiry: Re-conceptualizing the Work of Public Deliberation." In 2016: Confronting the challenges of public participation in environmental, planning and health decision-making. Iowa State University, Digital Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/sciencecommunication-180809-92.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Dignum, Frank, Virginia Dignum, Rui Prada, and Catholijn Jonker. "Social Deliberation for Organizations." In the 2014 Workshop. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2655985.2655987.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Dosono, Bryan, and Bryan Semaan. "Identity Work as Deliberation." In CHI '18: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174207.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Chingoma, Julian, and Adrian Haret. "Deliberation as Evidence Disclosure: A Tale of Two Protocol Types." In Thirty-Second International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence {IJCAI-23}. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2023/288.

Full text
Abstract:
We study a model inspired by deliberative practice, in which agents selectively disclose evidence about a set of alternatives prior to taking a final decision on them. We are interested in whether such a process, when iterated to termination, results in the objectively best alternatives being selected—thereby lending support to the idea that groups can be wise even when their members communicate with each other. We find that, under certain restrictions on the relative amounts of evidence, together with the actions available to the agents, there exist deliberation protocols in each of the two families we look at (i.e., simultaneous and sequential) that offer desirable guarantees. Simulation results further complement this picture, by showing how the distribution of evidence among the agents influences parameters of interest, such as the outcome of the protocols and the number of rounds until termination.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Deliberation"

1

Niang, Aminata, Lansine Sountoura, Kaderi Bukari, Imogen Bellwood-Howard, and Peter Taylor. Collaborative Art-Making for Deliberation in Africa. Institute of Development Studies, August 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/ids.2023.036.

Full text
Abstract:
Across West Africa and East Africa, policy actors and citizens have tended to discuss socio-environmental issues in ways that recognise emotional, subjective viewpoints, but can be antagonistic. Although deliberation literature suggests that collaborative arts-based activities can encourage consideration of affective dimensions, their major value in these emotive, hierarchical and antagonistic contexts is to promote more convivial working relationships.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Clayton, Amanda, Boniface Dulani, Katrina Kosec, and Amanda Lea Robinson. Gender, deliberation, and natural resource governance: Experimental evidence from Malawi. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.137083.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Bellwood-Howard, Imogen, Peter Taylor, and Aminata Niang. How to Use Collaborative Art-Making for Dialogue and Communication. Institute of Development Studies, August 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/ids.2023.035.

Full text
Abstract:
Artists have often used artworks to express emotions and thus prompt public dialogue about contemporary challenges. At the same time, it has been suggested that collaborative art-making can be used in environmental deliberation processes, where stakeholder groups discuss contentious challenges such as the effects of flooding. Policy actors have rarely been deeply involved in these processes. Our recent research showed that collaborative art could be used to develop relationships between groups, including policy actors, in deliberation processes, by creating artworks to bring concerns into the public domain.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Nweke, Emeka W., C. Obinna Ogwuike, and Chimere Iheonu. Policy Deliberation, Social Contracts, and Education Outcomes: Experimental Evidence from Enugu State, Nigeria. Research on Improving Systems of Education (RISE), February 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.35489/bsg-rise-ri_2022/037.

Full text
Abstract:
In this insight note, we describe the experimental design of the political economy project in Enugu State and provide data on stakeholder priorities and school infrastructure quality within the state. Pre-summit survey activities indicated that access to education, quality of education, and financial management are the top three priorities for community-level education stakeholders in Enugu. They also show that school infrastructures such as electricity, access, toilets, and physical building maintenance are lacking.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Soma, Samantha. Community, Conversation, and Conflict: a Study of Deliberation and Moderation in a Collaborative Political Weblog. Portland State University Library, January 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.15760/etd.1446.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Rangan, Subramanian, and Robert Lawrence. Search and Deliberation in International Exchange: Learning from Multinational Trade About Lags, Distance Effects, and Home Bias. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, March 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w7012.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Kabunga, Nassul Ssentamu, Caroline Miehe, Tewodaj Mogues, and Bjorn Van Campenhout. Community based monitoring and public service delivery: Impact, and the role of information, deliberation, and jurisdictional tier. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.133751.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Fritz, Brugger, Bezzola Selina, Hochet Peter, and Salavessa João. Public monitoring of the economic, social and environmental effect of industrial mining. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF), May 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.46446/publication_r4d.2020.2.en.

Full text
Abstract:
The transition to renewable energy and a digital economy increases the demand for minerals. The development impact of resource extraction is the green economy’s Achilles heel. The Resource Impact Dashboard (RID) is an evidence-based policy instrument to encourage constructive dialogue between stakeholders about concerns related to economic, social, environmental and institutional outcomes of industrial mining. Results from the pilot-phase corroborate the necessity and the promises of public monitoring and deliberation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Van Campenhout, Bjorn, Nassul Kabunga, Tewodaj Mogues, and Caroline Miehe. Community advocacy forums and public service delivery in Uganda: Impact and the role of information, deliberation, and administrative placement. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.2499/p15738coll2.133725.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Campenhout, Bjorn Van, Nassul Kabunga, Tewodaj Tewodaj, and Caroline Miehe. Community advocacy forums and public service delivery in Uganda: Impact and the role of information, deliberation and administrative placement. International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie), November 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.23846/pw2ie136.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Deliberation' for particular source types:
Journal articles Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography