Academic literature on the topic 'Defence innovation'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Defence innovation.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Defence innovation"
Shinkevich, A. I., and D. V. Kharitonov. "Integration of innovation development and implementation processes in defence industry according to a demand — supply format." Vestnik Universiteta, no. 9 (October 30, 2022): 47–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.26425/1816-4277-2022-9-47-55.
Full textFord, Matthew, Timothy Hodgetts, and David Williams. "Innovation Strategies for Defence." RUSI Journal 162, no. 2 (March 4, 2017): 52–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2017.1301216.
Full textBehera, Laxman Kumar. "Examining India’s defence innovation performance." Journal of Strategic Studies 44, no. 6 (September 19, 2021): 830–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2021.1993829.
Full textBasevich, Elvira. "Democracy’s Values and Ideals: A Duboisian Defence." Monist 107, no. 1 (January 1, 2024): 13–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/monist/onad028.
Full textBrožič, Liliana, and Klemen Kocjančič. "Editorial: Defence Research, Development and Innovation." CONTEMPORARY MILITARY CHALLENGES 25, no. 2 (June 1, 2023): 5–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/cmc-2023-0010.
Full textSampson, Ben. "Focus on Innovation." Aerospace Testing International 2023, no. 1 (March 2023): 24–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/s1478-2774(23)50327-6.
Full textJurčić, Marina, Sandra Lovrenčić, and Nataša Kurnoga. "Croatian Defense Industry Competitiveness Cluster: Knowledge Management and Innovation Perspective." Business Systems Research Journal 11, no. 1 (March 1, 2020): 59–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2020-0005.
Full textRaymond, Marie-Pierre, and Eric Fournier. "An access to innovation program to enhance the technological capabilities of the armed forces." Міжнародний науковий журнал «Military Science» 2, no. 1 (April 3, 2024): 83–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.62524/msj.2024.2.1.07.
Full textLöhr, Johannes. "McKinsey auf der Hardthöhe: Unternehmensberater im Bundesministerium der Verteidigung 1981/82." Administory 6, no. 1 (December 1, 2021): 151–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/adhi-2022-0002.
Full textRao, Shuktij Singh, Arindam Banik, Ashutosh Khanna, and Deepu Philip. "Disruptive Innovation in Indian Aerospace and Defence Industry." Studies in Microeconomics 8, no. 2 (November 18, 2019): 212–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2321022219874185.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Defence innovation"
James, Andrew D. "The changing nature of the defence industry and the defence innovation system : organisational actors, relationships and system boundaries." Thesis, University of Manchester, 2011. http://www.manchester.ac.uk/escholar/uk-ac-man-scw:148074.
Full textSilber, Stephane Carleton University Dissertation Management Studies. "Defence conversion: A comparison of the innovation processes of defence and non-defence products in the electronic sector of the Canadian defence industry." Ottawa, 1996.
Find full textMölleryd, Bengt A. "An anatomy of technological innovation in infrastructure and defence systems in Sweden after the Cold War." Licentiate thesis, KTH, Kraft- och värmeteknologi, 2011. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-31494.
Full textQC 20110317
Macwhannell, Robert. "An investigation of Organisational Carbon Accounting (OCA) practices in the defence sector to determine how these can best support low carbon technology innovation." Thesis, University of Central Lancashire, 2018. http://clok.uclan.ac.uk/23077/.
Full textLockhart, David E. "Open Innovation| Accelerating Innovative Products and Services through the Department of Defense Acquisition Management System." Thesis, University of Maryland University College, 2018. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10837400.
Full textThe purpose of this dissertation was to explore the application of open innovation theory concepts and practices employed in private industry to the federal public sector, specifically the Department of Defense (DoD) Defense Acquisition Management System (DAMS). This study considered using open innovation to improve the DoD’s ability to move innovative products and services through the DAMS faster, at a lower cost, while continuing to meet performance requirements for the DoD’s end-users. The theoretical lens was focused around the core concept of open innovation: collaboration with external parties, principally customers, and the acquisition, integration, and application of knowledge from external parties to improve innovation performance. The study also considered improved performance from the perspective of what the DoD, as the primary customer in the ecosystem, could do to raise the capacity of its supporting industrial base. Furthermore, the study considered the importance, use, and alignment of several secondary enablers that are needed to improve the probability of successfully implementing open innovation, including leadership and governance, culture, intellectual property and legal issues, funding, and technology. The study examined four propositions identified in the literature review and used realist synthesis in combination with the context, intervention, mechanism, and outcomes model to determine their validity. In the synthesis, the study identified four major findings that served to validate each of the propositions, essentially supporting the overall proposition that, as the primary customer in the ecosystem, the DoD’s effective use of collaboration with industry throughout the process and its provision of the right type of information earlier in the process resulted in better innovation performance for everyone in the ecosystem.
Murphy, Michael F. "Medical operations centers duplication or a needed innovation? /." Thesis, Monterey, California : Naval Postgraduate School, 2009. http://edocs.nps.edu/npspubs/scholarly/theses/2009/Dec/09Dec%5FMurphy.pdf.
Full textThesis Advisor(s): Bach, Robert. Second Reader: Woodbury, Glen. "December 2009." Description based on title screen as viewed on January 28, 2010. Author(s) subject terms: medical operations center, medical system, public-health system, medical surge, homeland security, integration, coordination, collaboration, emergency management, mass casualty, disaster, communications, resource management, public-health emergency, ESF-8, HSPD-21, EMS, hospitals. Includes bibliographical references (p. 123-128). Also available in print.
Vernhes, Gabriel. "Les relations entre sciences, technologies et territoires au cœur de la souveraineté nationale : une approche structurale sur longue période." Electronic Thesis or Diss., Institut polytechnique de Paris, 2024. http://www.theses.fr/2024IPPAE002.
Full textThis thesis delves into the territorial dimension of scientific and technological knowledge exchange, a pivotal aspect of the innovation process. It focuses on defence-related technological fields, such as weaponry, aerospace equipment and 3D printing, to scrutinize how scientific advancements are integrated into technological development. Furthermore, our analysis focuses on measuring strategic autonomy of national territories, assessing their capacity to independently produce, use and disseminate knowledge. This form of autonomy in critical defence innovation sectors is a key factor in current discussions on national sovereignty.From an institutionalist viewpoint, this manuscript situates the innovation process within the national innovation system framework. In this context, territory is understood as a social, political and cultural construct that facilitates interactions and the exchange of knowledge.Our empirical method mobilizes quantitative methods using a large number of patent data and scientific publications to establish global knowledge networks, based on citations and semantic proximity. In this regard, we employ a structural approach, integrating influence graph theory consolidated with econometric models.Our findings reveal two distinct global knowledge networks. The first, encompassing explicit knowledge, can be easily disseminated, and assimilated across various territories. The analysis of these networks permits a comparative evaluation of the control over strategic knowledge among different territories, highlighting situations of dominance or dependence on external sources of knowledge. The second network, with more local roots, comprises tacit, applied knowledge that is intrinsic to individuals and their social interaction networks, thereby being geographically bounded. This network accounts for the sustained presence of national expertise over an extended period, notwithstanding the globalized nature of knowledge exchange driven by globalisation and the advancement of information and communication technologies.Our study shows that the coexistence of these networks is essential in knowledge maturation. Despite the more codified and globalized nature of scientific activity compared to technological, it retains strong territorial ties, fostering local innovation through tacit knowledge exchange. These insights suggest that investments in specific domains are crucial for enhancing national sovereignty in strategic innovation
Cremonini, Edoardo. "Performance and monitoring of innovative coastal defense works." Master's thesis, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, 2017.
Find full textMyers, Todd P. (Todd Preston). "Democratizing innovation in the Department of Defense : a model for improving innovation in an era of fiscal tightening." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/105298.
Full textCataloged from PDF version of thesis. "13 December 2013."
Includes bibliographical references (pages 98-103).
Democratized innovation is a paradigm characterized by users moving beyond the traditional construct that portrays them as passive recipients of firm-developed products. This field of research was launched by Professor Eric von Hippel in the 1970s with his landmark study on the scientific instrument industry that identified users as the source for the majority of new products on the market. Following this work, empirical studies have been conducted in countless other fields; however, the existing research regarding user innovation within the military is lacking This work contributes to the existing literature by investigating user innovation principles within the context of the DoD with a multi-axis study that examines toolkit-related innovation, user-initiated projects, institutional attempts to stimulate user innovation, and the introduction of maker spaces. The exploratory research included here allows us to study patterns and compare internal and external factors in a way that avoids extrapolating overly broad conclusions from a single case. Considered together, the projects yield evidence supporting the existence of user innovation within the Army, Air Force, Navy, and Marines. They are also a mix of software development, hardware modification, and "platforming" initiatives. Our findings reveal environmental factors that, at times, stunt the naturally occurring user innovation processes and distort the democratized innovation construct formulated by von Hippel and his colleagues. Following the identification of these barriers to user innovation, we suggest ways in which DoD leadership might rebalance the scales between formal R&D units and user-innovators. These proposals consist of catalyzing agents that would serve to counteract DoD-specific barriers to user innovation and allow the military to access previously untapped human capital. Throughout this work, user innovation is shown to hold significant promise as an additional source of new product concepts for the DoD. The current state of the military acquisitions system, which is beset by aging equipment, a shifting strategic picture, rapid technological change, and declining budgets, demands that this promise be acted upon.
by Todd P. Myers.
S.M. in Engineering and Management
MELO, DANIEL PETERSON CARVALHO DE. "INFRASTRUCTURAL TECHNOLOGIES AND INNOVATION IN THE BASIS OF THE BRAZILIAN INDUSTRIAL DEFENSE." PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO, 2014. http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=24363@1.
Full textCOORDENAÇÃO DE APERFEIÇOAMENTO DO PESSOAL DE ENSINO SUPERIOR
INSTITUTO MILITAR DE ENGENHARIA
CENTRO TECNOLÓGICO DO EXÉRCITO
PROGRAMA DE SUPORTE À PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO DE INSTS. DE ENSINO
O objetivo da dissertação é contribuir para o avanço do conhecimento sobre a capacidade de inovação e os obstáculos à inovação enfrentados pelas empresas da Base Industrial da Defesa (BID), destacando-se o papel da Tecnologia Industrial Básica (TIB) no fortalecimento dessa capacidade. Particularmente, a dissertação procura responder como as empresas da BID percebem a importância das funções da TIB - metrologia, normalização, regulamentação técnica e avaliação da conformidade – em seus ciclos de inovação, na perspectiva de ressaltar os benefícios oriundos da consolidação da infraestrutura nacional de serviços tecnológicos de suporte à capacidade inovadora dessas empresas. A metodologia compreende: (i) revisão bibliográfica e documental sobre os temas centrais da dissertação; (ii) definição do objeto do estudo; seleção da fonte primária de dados – Pesquisa de Inovação (Pintec) do IBGE – e da grade de análise da pesquisa; (iii) elaboração do plano tabular para solicitação ao IBGE de tabulações especiais da Pintec 2011; (iv) análise e discussão dos resultados; e (v) formulação das conclusões da pesquisa e de sugestões para a próxima Pintec e estudos futuros. Destacam-se como resultados: (i) a identificação de itens da Pintec diretamente associados às funções da TIB; (ii) a análise da percepção das empresas da BID sobre a relevância das funções da TIB para a inovação; e (iii) a análise comparativa dos padrões de respostas das empresas da BID que implementaram inovações e das que não implementaram.
The main aim of this dissertation is to contribute to the understanding of basic infrastructural technologies support to innovation activities by firms of defense industry in Brazil. Particularly, this work seeks to answer how defense firms perceive the importance of infrastructural technologies - metrology, standardization, technical regulation and conformity assessment - in their innovation cycles. The methodology comprises: (i) a literature survey to elaborate a theoretical outline to characterize the core subjects of the research: defense innovation system and defense products; sectorial systems of innovation; and infrastructural technologies; (ii) definition of the research scope; selection of the primary data source - the Brazilian Survey of Technological Innovation (Pintec), published by the Statistical Office (IBGE), and the research analytical framework; (iii) data collection and tabulation; (iv) main findings discussion; and (v) formulation of conclusions and suggestions for the next Pintec survey and for future research. The main results can be summarized as follows: (i) identification of PINTEC items directly associated with basic infrastructural technologies; (ii) identification and analysis of Brazilian defense firms perceptions about the relevance of basic infrastructural technologies in supporting their innovation strategies; and (iii) comparative analysis of patterns of response of innovative and non-innovative defense firms.
Books on the topic "Defence innovation"
Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses, ed. Defence innovation in India: The fault lines. New Delhi: Institute for Defence Studies & Analyses, 2014.
Find full textRaska, Michael, and Richard A. Bitzinger. The AI Wave in Defence Innovation. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003218326.
Full textRaska, Michael, Katarzyna Zysk, and Ian Bowers. Defence Innovation and the 4th Industrial Revolution. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003268215.
Full text1943-, Elliott David, Armson Rosalind, and Open University. Design and Innovation Course Team., eds. Design and innovation.: Kondratieff cycles, defence technology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1986.
Find full textAdlakha-Hutcheon, Gitanjali, and Anthony Masys, eds. Disruption, Ideation and Innovation for Defence and Security. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06636-8.
Full text1953-, Harding Richard, ed. The Royal Navy, 1930-1990: Innovation and defence. New York, NY: Routledge, 2004.
Find full textMagnussen, Leif. Chapter 18 Didactics and Innovation in Collaboration for the Unforeseen in Training Practice Preparation. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk/NOASP (Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing), 2018.
Find full textDrake, Irmelin. Chapter 12 Social Innovation and Collaboration: Identifying and Engaging Stakeholders with Power, Purpose, Passion and Presence. Oslo: Cappelen Damm Akademisk/NOASP (Nordic Open Access Scholarly Publishing), 2018.
Find full textWim, Smit, Grin John, and Voronkov L. S, eds. Military technological innovation and stability in a changing world: Politically assessing and influencing weapon innovation and military research and development. Amsterdam: VU University Press, 1992.
Find full textCulkin, Nigel. The search for innovation through divine intervention: A case study of defence diversification. Hertford: University of Hertfordshire, 1997.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Defence innovation"
Behera, Laxman Kumar. "Examining India's defence innovation performance." In Comparing Defense Innovation Around the World, 99–122. London: Routledge, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003325055-5.
Full textRaska, Michael. "Reimagining Defense Innovation: Defense AI in Singapore." In Contributions to Security and Defence Studies, 555–80. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-58649-1_25.
Full textKronz, Hermann. "Response in Defence of the Innovation Patent Concept." In Direct Protection of Innovation, 257–76. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1265-1_12.
Full textCanca, Cansu. "AI Ethics and Governance in Defence Innovation." In The AI Wave in Defence Innovation, 59–79. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003218326-4.
Full textJames, Andrew. "Defence and Security: New Issues and Impacts." In Science, Technology and Innovation Studies, 287–302. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04370-4_13.
Full textHinata-Yamaguchi, Ryo. "Comparing Military AI Strategic Perspectives." In The AI Wave in Defence Innovation, 199–216. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003218326-10.
Full textSoare, Simona R. "European Military AI." In The AI Wave in Defence Innovation, 80–111. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003218326-5.
Full textRaska, Michael, and Richard A. Bitzinger. "Introduction." In The AI Wave in Defence Innovation, 1–11. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003218326-1.
Full textHaotian, Qi. "China's Evolving AI Development." In The AI Wave in Defence Innovation, 136–55. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003218326-7.
Full textStanley-Lockman, Zoe. "US Governance of Artificial Intelligence for National Security." In The AI Wave in Defence Innovation, 112–35. London: Routledge, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003218326-6.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Defence innovation"
Ranjith, Geethika, Nandana Jayachandran, and Aleena Mairya Anil. "Satellite-Borne Space Waste Management System Using 3D Printing and Robotics : Innovation for space technology." In 2024 IEEE Space, Aerospace and Defence Conference (SPACE), 705–8. IEEE, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/space63117.2024.10667807.
Full textGoudarzi, Kiyanoush, Abouzar Gharajeh, Fargol Seifollahi, Hamidreza Ramezani, and Qing Gu. "Defect mode lasing in a non-Hermitian 1D trivial SSH lattice." In CLEO: Science and Innovations, SF3E.2. Washington, D.C.: Optica Publishing Group, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/cleo_si.2024.sf3e.2.
Full textTwort, Lauren, and John Louth. "The Challenges of Innovation in UK Defence." In Annual International Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (IE 2017). Global Science & Technology Forum (GSTF), 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5176/2251-2039_ie17.4.
Full textHowe, J. "Technology strategy and innovation in the defence context." In IET 2nd International Technology and Innovation Conference. IEE, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ic:20060225.
Full textCarr, Debra. "Innovation for a Safer Future: The Defence and Security Accelerator." In SPIE Security + Defence Industry Talks, edited by Conference Chair. SPIE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2582385.
Full textOrson, Jay A., and Tyler N. Hague. "Battlefield innovation: a case-study of remote sensor development." In Optics/Photonics in Security and Defence, edited by Gary W. Kamerman, Ove K. Steinvall, Keith L. Lewis, Keith A. Krapels, John C. Carrano, and Arturas Zukauskas. SPIE, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.739030.
Full textChana, Deeph. "NATO DIANA: a case study for reimagining defence innovation." In SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing Plenaries and Industry Events 2024. SPIE, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.3032432.
Full textBray, Mark E., and Robert A. Shears. "Results from the electro-optic sensors domain of the materials and components for missiles innovation and technology partnership (phase 1)." In SPIE Security + Defence, edited by David A. Huckridge and Reinhard Ebert. SPIE, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2028735.
Full textJakobsson, Ase K., Elena Mazourenko, Regina Crameri, and Diana Shrimpton. "Innovation and emergent technologies for defence — Logic and creativity." In 2014 9th International Conference on System of Systems Engineering (SOSE). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/sysose.2014.6892478.
Full textJasi, Dorothea Sthallhani, Romie Oktovianus Bura, and Jupriyanto. "Innovation of Defense Technology Audit to Support Self-Reliant National Defense Industry." In 2019 IEEE 6th Asian Conference on Defence Technology (ACDT). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/acdt47198.2019.9072944.
Full textReports on the topic "Defence innovation"
Meisiek, Stefan. Occasional Paper No 26 - Benchmarking Bottom-up Innovation at the Australian Defence Force: An International Comparative Analysis. Australian Army Research Centre, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.61451/267511.
Full textAhola, Michael J. To Defend the Temple: Innovation in the Israeli Defense Force. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, January 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada443516.
Full textWagen, Carey M. Twenty-First Century Defense and Disruptive Innovation. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, March 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada563406.
Full textFlagg, Melissa, and Jack Corrigan. Ending Innovation Tourism: Rethinking the U.S. Military’s Approach to Emerging Technology Adoption. Center for Security and Emerging Technology, July 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.51593/20210030.
Full textLuong, Ngor, Rebecca Gelles, and Melissa Flagg. Mapping the AI Investment Activities of Top Global Defense Companies. Center for Security and Emerging Technology, October 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.51593/20210015.
Full textGehlhaus, Diana, James Ryseff, and Jack Corrigan. The Race for U.S. Technical Talent. Center for Security and Emerging Technology, August 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.51593/20210074.
Full textDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON DC. Defense Small Business Innovation Research Program (SBIR). Defense Agencies Abstracts of Phase 2 Awards 1993. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, January 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada282874.
Full textDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON DC. Defense Small Business Innovation Research Program (SBIR). Volume 4. Defense Agencies Abstracts of Phase 1 Awards. 1990. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, January 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada248990.
Full textDEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE WASHINGTON DC. Defense Small Business Innovation Research Program (SBIR), Volume 4, Defense Agencies Abstracts of Phase 1 Awards 1991. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, January 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada252510.
Full textCoughlan, Peter J., and William Gates. Innovations in Defense Acquisition: Asymmetric Information and Incentive Contract Design. Fort Belvoir, VA: Defense Technical Information Center, December 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.21236/ada529452.
Full text