Academic literature on the topic 'Decisional autonomy'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Decisional autonomy.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Decisional autonomy"
Levin, Paul E. "Patient Autonomy and Decisional Capacity." Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 84, no. 11 (November 2002): 2105–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200211000-00035.
Full textCapozzi, James D., and Rosamond Rhodes. "Patient Autonomy and Decisional Capacity." Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume 84, no. 11 (November 2002): 2106. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200211000-00036.
Full textIngrand, Félix, Simon Lacroix, Solange Lemai-Chenevier, and Frederic Py. "Decisional autonomy of planetary rovers." Journal of Field Robotics 24, no. 7 (2007): 559–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/rob.20206.
Full textDimopoulos, Georgina. "A theory of children's decisional privacy." Legal Studies 41, no. 3 (April 5, 2021): 430–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/lst.2021.16.
Full textCelen, Nermin, Figen Cok, Harke A. Bosma, and H. Zijsling Djurre. "Perceptions of decisional uutonomy of Turkish adolescents and their parents." Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto) 16, no. 35 (December 2006): 349–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0103-863x2006000300006.
Full textGiralt, Georges. "Mobile Robots: Decisional and Operational Autonomy." IFAC Proceedings Volumes 29, no. 4 (October 1996): 63–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1474-6670(17)44686-6.
Full textKassirer, Samantha, and Celia Gaertig. "The Costs of Autonomy: Decisional Autonomy Undermines Advisees' Judgements of Experts." Academy of Management Proceedings 2019, no. 1 (August 1, 2019): 15721. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2019.15721abstract.
Full textKassirer, Samantha, Emma E. Levine, and Celia Gaertig. "Decisional autonomy undermines advisees’ judgments of experts in medicine and in life." Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117, no. 21 (May 7, 2020): 11368–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910572117.
Full textHostiuc, S., I. Negoi, and E. Drima. "Decisional capacity in patients with acute delirium. A Rawlsian approach." European Psychiatry 41, S1 (April 2017): S581. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2017.01.872.
Full textOwen, Gareth S., Fabian Freyenhagen, Genevra Richardson, and Matthew Hotopf. "Mental Capacity and Decisional Autonomy: An Interdisciplinary Challenge." Inquiry 52, no. 1 (February 2009): 79–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00201740802661502.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Decisional autonomy"
Jörgensen, Linn, and Sara Flytström. "Surrogatmodern - utnyttjad eller autonom? : En kvalitativ idéanalys om den svenska debattens syn på surrogatarrangemang." Thesis, Högskolan i Halmstad, Akademin för lärande, humaniora och samhälle, 2021. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-45106.
Full textMartín, Badia Júlia. "Cap a l’autonomia de l’adolescent: model d’acompanyament per a professionals assistencials." Doctoral thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/667813.
Full text[eng] The respect for patients’ autonomy has become a fundamental principle of bioethics, which has led to legal changes and a shift of the healthcare model, but in the case of minor patients it is very controversial: medical decisions are not taken advantage of in order to support these patients in their maturing process, so it is difficult to respect the autonomy which is neither recognized nor promoted. There is a double cause for this. On the one hand, minors have been and are seen as immature, as having no reasoning power and, in the medical field, in a biocentrical way. This has prevented healthcare professionals to gain awareness of their educative role and, consequently, the current healthcare relationship is not an empowering one but a paternalistic or adultistic one. On the other hand, the legislation upon which professionals rely establishes three criteria for dealing with minors’ decisional capacity, two of which are ambiguous, because of being subjective (maturity and best interests of the child). The third one, the age, is objective, so it gives legal security, but is not standardisable. In this way, if adults do not assume their duty of ensure that these rights are exercisable, the discourse of the rights of the child has no content. Taking this situation into account, this thesis suggests a model of autonomy promotion in minors of 12 to 15 years old (age bracket called “mature minor”), that is to say, a model of accompanying minor patients in their process of forging autonomy. The aim of this model is the forge of autonomy. It can be understood as the right and capacity to make decisions, which in the medical field are intended to develop self-care. Hence, the adolescent will need help to empower himself and to develop basic capacities. And the strategy to do so must be participation, as long as capacities can only be acquired by exercising them. Supporting adolescents will then consist on a virtuous circle between autonomy, participation and capacities. This model has to be assumable for any professional working with adolescents, in order to foster coordination between fields (healthcare, education, social work) and, therefore, an integrative view of minors. But, at the same time, it has to be applicable to the specificities of each field, so as not to make any professional go beyond his profession. This model is adolescent and family-centred, which requires two types of abiliites from professionals: communicative and pedagogical. This model has three requirements. One, having a biopsychosocial view of adolescents. Second, exercing an empowering responsibility towards them. And third, understanding that accompanying adolescents is a community process. In addition, it will be based on essential ethical principles, such as dignity, vulnerability or solidarity. And it will have three ends: one, forging identity, which is narrative and relational; two, empowerment, which has to do with developing capacities and moral development; and three, care, which should be understood as caring of adolescent’s voice and body. In short, the suggested model understands that supporting adolescents means recognizing them as subjects of needs, subjects of rights and duties and subjects of capacities to forge self-care, autonomy and their vital project. In order to ensure that the model is applicable to the daily practice of any professional working with adolescents, we propose a deliberative decision-making procedure that consists of 9 steps, as well as we include a last chapter of recommendations for professionals according to each healthcare service.
Pack, Robert Harold. "Charter schools: Innovation, autonomy, and decision-making." Diss., The University of Arizona, 1999. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/288954.
Full textJaïem, Lotfi. "Contribution à l'autonomie des robots : vers la garantie de performance en robotique mobile autonome par la gestion des ressources matérielles et logicielles." Thesis, Montpellier, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016MONTT338/document.
Full textThe performance is a multi-form concept widely defined in manufacturing robotics with specific environment conditions (static and perfectly known) and infinite energy).However, performance indicators proposed in mobile robotics are less widely accepted.We differenciate between main performance axes (energy, safety, localization and stability) and secondary performance axes (duration for example).In our work, we are interested on missions realized under duration, safety and energy performance constraints, in a known but dynamic environment.Applying the different constraints decomposes the mission into a sequence of activities realized under invariant constraints.Each one, can be realized by a set of robotic tasks (move, be located, analyze an image, etc.).These tasks can be implemented in various ways according to the different possibles actuators, sensors and algorithms configurations.The adressed problem is the following: how to choose the hardware and software resources to use along a mission while satisfying the different performance constraints ? It is a multicriteria knapsack problem known to be NP-hard, where the complexity becomes very quickly unexplorable.To propose and guarantee an applicable solution under real-time constraints, we used an algorithm allowing to find a set of good solutions in few iterations.The proposed resources management approach is implemented on a Pioneer-3DX robot using a control architecture based on the Middleware ContrACT.This approach has been validated on a patrolling mission travelling 200 m within the LIRMM laboratory during about 10 mn, to verify the state of valves.For the considered mission, the state space dimension is higher than 10^{14}.The hardware and software resources are dynamically and autonomously selected along the mission to satisfy the different performance constraints.If a resource becomes faulty and/or many obstacle avoidances occure and lead to performance drift, the developed approach finds on line a new resources allocation solution (if it exists).So this approach allows to enhance the fault tolerance of the robotic system
Biurrun, Garrido Ainoa. "La humanización de la asistencia al parto: Valoración de la satisfacción, autonomía y del autocontrol." Doctoral thesis, Universitat de Barcelona, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/10803/457137.
Full textINTRODUCTION: Since the second half of the 20th century, the care during pregnancy and childbirth has undergone a process of ‘medicalization’ and ‘technification’. This incremental medicating during the attention received by the patient has caused a difference of opinion: while some consider the increasing use of medication and technology throughout childbirth attention a positive indicator of medical progress, others make these processes responsible for the dehumanization in the care of pregnant women. Hence, they call for the return to a more respectful treatment for each person, pregnant woman, woman in labour and/or postpartum woman. As a result of the ‘medicalization’ phenomena, in recent years a change in the model of the attention received during childbirth has taken place. In this change, the concept of humanization related to healthcare attention during the childbirth has been emphasized. However, it must be pointed out that the choice of a more or less technical assistance means deciding among different models of attention that have different consequences: ethical, political, institutional and organizational. OBJECTIVE: To understand women’s experience with the purpose of going into detail about what it means for them a humanized and satisfactory attention to childbirth. METHODOLOGY: As a first step of this research, it was carried out a review about the published bibliography with which a contextual historical obstetric approach was developed, and there were identified the elements that determine a humanized childbirth attention according to the bibliography. Afterwards, it was performed a qualitative study with a phenomenological interpretative design following Gadamer’s perspective. There were conducted 21 interviews in women with low and medium gestational obstetrical gestation to identify the elements that contribute to a perception of humanized and satisfactory delivery. After that, we conducted 8 additional interviews in order to deepen in the women’s experience related to informed decision making during childbirth attention. RESULTS: It was observed that the elements that the women recognized as fundamental for a positive, satisfactory and humanized experience of the attention received were related to: prior expectations they had of it, which were conditioned by the social imaginary of childbirth as a risky situation with the experience that they had; in case of previous births, with the perceived safety, respect for privacy and emotional support received during labour and delivery. In addition, it was found that women’s experience in relation to informed decision making during childbirth attention, it is determined by its decision making capacity during this process in certain aspects and this capacity is developed throughout a process which begins in the third trimester of pregnancy and concludes in childbirth, making different requests to the professionals depending on the situation during the assistance. CONCLUSIONS: The social conception that defines childbirth as a “risk situation” influences the expectations that the women around us form and influences the experience of giving birth; the security provided by the hospital infrastructure and technology is an important factor for the women interviewed. Recognition of independent capacity to make decisions, respect for privacy and the feeling of a connection with the midwives, were also seen as fundamental elements. It is important that healthcare professionals be particularly sensitive with regard to privacy, that women are asked before they are attended to by trainees and that midwives adopt an ethical sensitivity that contributes to respect for the women’s autonomy.
Leonard, Samantha Jane. "Difficult decisions : autonomy, prenatal choice and prognostic ambiguity." Thesis, University of Bristol, 2014. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.683564.
Full textBaker, Eileen F. "Autonomy and Informed Consent." Bowling Green State University / OhioLINK, 2017. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=bgsu1491391673593916.
Full textDaltorio, Kathryn A. "Obstacle Navigation Decision-Making: Modeling Insect Behavior for Robot Autonomy." Case Western Reserve University School of Graduate Studies / OhioLINK, 2013. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=case1365157897.
Full textSwindell, Jennifer Sproul. "Respecting autonomy in cases of ambivalence regarding end of life decisions." Diss., Connect to online resource - MSU authorized users, 2008.
Find full textVeale, Martin Orla. "Advance care directives and medical treatment decision-making: preserving patient autonomy." Thesis, McGill University, 2014. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=123329.
Full textLe principe d'autonomie permet à chacun de prendre les décisions relatives à son corps, et par conséquent, permet à l'individu de décider quel traitement médical accepter ou refuser. Toutefois, lorsque l'individu n'a pas la capacité de décider, il ou elle peut être soumis à des traitements médicaux qu'un décideur substitut considère être en son « meilleur intérêt ». Cette décision n'est pas nécessairement conforme aux désirs exprimés par la personne traitée alors qu'elle en avait la capacité. Pour préserver leur autonomie alors qu'ils en ont encore la capacité, certains rédigent un document appelé directive préalable de traitement. Dans plusieurs juridictions de « common law », ces directives font l'objet d'un cadre législatif. Cette thèse considère la légalité de telles directives dans les juridictions dépourvues d'un tel cadre législatif et utilise l'Irlande comme étude de cas parce que le droit statutaire irlandais ne se prononce pas sur les directives préalables de traitement.
Books on the topic "Decisional autonomy"
Final choices: Autonomy in health care decisions. Springfield, Ill., U.S.A: Thomas, 1989.
Find full textSchermer, Maartje. The different faces of autonomy: Patient autonomy in ethical theory and hospital practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002.
Find full textSchermer, Maartje. The different faces of autonomy: Patient autonomy in ethical theory and hospital practice. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic, 2001.
Find full textThe practice of autonomy: Patients, doctors, and medical decisions. New York: Oxford Unviersity Press, 1998.
Find full textChan, Hui Yun. Advance Directives: Rethinking Regulation, Autonomy & Healthcare Decision-Making. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00976-2.
Full textRespecting patient autonomy. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1999.
Find full textAgainst autonomy: Justifying coercive paternalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Find full textKofi, Awusabo-Asare, ed. Female autonomy, family decision making, and demographic behavior in Africa. Lewiston, N.Y: Edwin Mellen Press, 1999.
Find full textMoshe, Sokol, and Rabbi Isaac Elchanan Theological Seminary., eds. Rabbinic authority and personal autonomy. Northvale, N.J: J. Aronson, 1992.
Find full textLamb, David. Therapy abatement, autonomy and futility: Ethical decisions at edge of life. Brookfield, VT: Avebury, Ashgate Pub., 1995.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Decisional autonomy"
Lee, Shui Chuen. "On Relational Autonomy." In The Family, Medical Decision-Making, and Biotechnology, 83–93. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-5220-0_7.
Full textDennis, Louise, and Michael Fisher. "Verifiable Autonomy and Responsible Robotics." In Software Engineering for Robotics, 189–217. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66494-7_7.
Full textBarber, K. Suzanne, and Cheryl E. Martin. "Autonomy as Decision-Making Control." In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 343–45. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44631-1_25.
Full textSuksi, Markku. "Participation in Decision-Making." In Sub-State Governance through Territorial Autonomy, 395–506. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20048-9_6.
Full textKormushev, Petar, and Seyed Reza Ahmadzadeh. "Robot Learning for Persistent Autonomy." In Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 3–28. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26327-4_1.
Full textOlver, Ian N. "Autonomy and Life or Death Decisions." In Is Death Ever Preferable to Life?, 69–94. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1976-6_4.
Full textSimsek, Burak, Katinka Wolter, and Hakan Coskun. "Dynamic Decision Making for Candidate Access Point Selection." In Autonomic Networking, 50–63. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11880905_5.
Full textWódczak, Michał. "Autonomic Decision Making Entities." In Autonomic Computing Enabled Cooperative Networked Design, 59–72. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0764-9_6.
Full textRosin, Frédéric, Pascal Forget, Samir Lamouri, and Robert Pellerin. "Industry 4.0 and Decision Making." In Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, 400–405. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70566-4_63.
Full textTwamley, Katherine. "Parental Authority, Youth Autonomy and Marital Decisions." In Love, Marriage and Intimacy among Gujarati Indians, 51–66. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137294302_3.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Decisional autonomy"
Saglietti, Francesca, David Fohrweiser, Stefan Winzinger, and Raimar Lill. "Model-Based Design and Testing of Decisional Autonomy and Cooperation in Cyber-Physical Systems." In 2015 41st Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA). IEEE, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/seaa.2015.68.
Full textBarber, K. S., R. M. McKay, C. E. Martin, T. H. Liu, J. Kim, D. Han, and A. Goel. "Sensible Agents in Supply Chain Management: An Example Highlighting Procurement and Production Decisions." In ASME 1999 Design Engineering Technical Conferences. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc99/cie-9078.
Full textDignum, Virginia. "Responsible Autonomy." In Twenty-Sixth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. California: International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2017/655.
Full textFerry, Mitch, Ziming Tu, Leesa Stephens, and Graham Prickett. "Towards True UAV Autonomy." In 2007 Information, Decision and Control. IEEE, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/idc.2007.374544.
Full textMichelson, R. C. "Full autonomy of intelligent flight." In Information, Decision and Control. IEEE, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/idc.2002.995360.
Full textAlexandrov, Natalia. "Explainable AI Decisions for Human-Autonomy Interactions." In 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference. Reston, Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2017-3991.
Full textBeal, Jacob, Jonathan Webb, and Michael Atighetchi. "Adjustable autonomy for cross-domain entitlement decisions." In the 3rd ACM workshop. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1866423.1866436.
Full textChanron, Vincent, and Kemper Lewis. "Convergence and Stability in Distributed Design of Large Systems." In ASME 2004 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. ASMEDC, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/detc2004-57344.
Full textHuang, Hui-Min, Elena Messina, Robert Wade, Ralph English, Brian Novak, and James Albus. "Autonomy Measures for Robots." In ASME 2004 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. ASMEDC, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece2004-61812.
Full textChee, Matthew, and Cameron J. Turner. "Localized Decision-Making for Materials Transportation Systems Subject to Stochastic Uncertainty." In ASME 2014 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece2014-38274.
Full textReports on the topic "Decisional autonomy"
Konaev, Margarita, Husanjot Chahal, Ryan Fedasiuk, Tina Huang, and Ilya Rahkovsky. U.S. Military Investments in Autonomy and AI: A Budgetary Assessment. Center for Security and Emerging Technology, October 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.51593/20200069.
Full textPasquerella, Lynn, and Lawrence E. Rothstein. Investigation of the Ethical Concepts that Inform the Laws Limiting Genetic Screening in Employment Decisions: Privacy, Human Dignity, Equality, Autonomy, Efficiency. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/900759.
Full textFindlay, Trevor. The Role of International Organizations in WMD Compliance and Enforcement: Autonomy, Agency, and Influence. The United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research, December 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.37559/wmd/20/wmdce9.
Full textHaberland, Nicole, Erica Chong, and Hillary J. Bracken. Married adolescents: An overview. Population Council, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.31899/pgy22.1005.
Full text