Academic literature on the topic 'DDT (Insecticide) Environmental aspects'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'DDT (Insecticide) Environmental aspects.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "DDT (Insecticide) Environmental aspects"
Kampango, Ayubo, Emma F. Hocke, Helle Hansson, Peter Furu, Khamis A. Haji, Jean-Philippe David, Flemming Konradsen, et al. "High DDT resistance without apparent association to kdr and Glutathione-S-transferase (GST) gene mutations in Aedes aegypti population at hotel compounds in Zanzibar." PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 16, no. 5 (May 16, 2022): e0010355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010355.
Full textGuimarães, Raphael Mendonça, Carmen Ildes Rodrigues Fróes Asmus, and Armando Meyer. "DDT reintroduction for malaria control: the cost-benefit debate for public health." Cadernos de Saúde Pública 23, no. 12 (December 2007): 2835–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-311x2007001200004.
Full textDores, Eliana Freire Gaspar de Carvalho, Leandro Carbo, and Adley Bergson Gonçalves de Abreu. "Serum DDT in malaria vector control sprayers in Mato Grosso State, Brazil." Cadernos de Saúde Pública 19, no. 2 (April 2003): 429–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-311x2003000200009.
Full textPoniman, Tri Retnaningsih Soeprobowowati, and Muhammad Helmi. "Geospatial distributions of organochlorine insecticide in shallot agriculture land at Wanasari sub-district, Brebes regency, Central Java, Indonesia." E3S Web of Conferences 202 (2020): 06009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202020206009.
Full textDeb, Rinki, Rudra Pratap Singh, Prabhas Kumar Mishra, Lisa Hitchins, Emma Reid, Arti Manorama Barwa, Debanjan Patra, et al. "Impact of IRS: Four-years of entomological surveillance of the Indian Visceral Leishmaniases elimination programme." PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 15, no. 8 (August 9, 2021): e0009101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009101.
Full textMbabazi, Jolocam. "DDT in indoor residual spraying: human health aspects." International Journal of Environmental Studies 70, no. 4 (August 2013): 663–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00207233.2013.813714.
Full textTkachenko, I. V. "Hygienic assessment of potential ecotoxicological risk of the use of new insecticide spiromesifen in agriculture of Ukraine." Environment & Health, no. 4 (101) (November 2021): 62–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.32402/dovkil2021.04.062.
Full textCollins, Emma L., Jody E. Phelan, Magdalena Hubner, Anton Spadar, Monica Campos, Daniel Ward, Holly Acford-Palmer, et al. "A next generation targeted amplicon sequencing method to screen for insecticide resistance mutations in Aedes aegypti populations reveals a rdl mutation in mosquitoes from Cabo Verde." PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 16, no. 12 (December 13, 2022): e0010935. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010935.
Full textGalván-Portillo, Marcia, Carlos Jiménez-Gutiérrez, Luisa Torres-Sánchez, and Lizbeth López-Carrillo. "Food consumption and adipose tissue DDT levels in Mexican women." Cadernos de Saúde Pública 18, no. 2 (April 2002): 447–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0102-311x2002000200009.
Full textMaunder, John W. "Strategic aspects of insecticide resistance in head lice." Journal of the Royal Society of Health 111, no. 1 (February 1991): 24–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146642409111100109.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "DDT (Insecticide) Environmental aspects"
Kantachote, Duangporn. "The use of microbial inoculants to enhance DDT degradation in contaminated soil." Title page, contents and abstract only, 2001. http://web4.library.adelaide.edu.au/theses/09PH/09phk165.pdf.
Full textMorodi, Thabiso John. "To spray or not to spray with DDT to control malaria : a case study in environmental ethics." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/53698.
Full textFull text to be digitised and attached to bibliographic record.
ENGLISH ABSTRACT: This assignment is devoted to an in depth analysis of the pro- and the contra-positions in the long-standing and costly debate about the question whether to spray with DDT or not in the fight against malaria. I argue that the dilemma whether or not to spray with DDT is born out of a political agenda, hype, exaggeration and misinformation of the first order. Radical environmentalists appear to insist that DDT is a principal contributor of environmental degradation, and the major cause of death amongst wildlife and humans. Worse still, many Western people seem to be under the impression that mosquitoes cannot cause so much human misery as purported, and that malaria is caused by some kind of plant form of life, or even a virus. The proponents of DDT, on the other hand, appear to be convinced that DDT is a saviour of humankind, and argue that the horrors associated with DDT are exaggerated and baseless, as they are not backed by scientific inquiry. Proponents of DDT also believe that anything that is overused may kill, even ordinary table salt. Inthis assignment, both of these positions are scrutinized. On the basis of an historical overview in Chapter I of the history of the use of DDT, and the emergence of the debate about DDT in the wake of Rachel Carson's Silent Spring (1962), Chapter 2 is devoted to an evaluation of seven basic arguments against the use of DDT, while in Chapter 3 six arguments for the use of DDT are weighed. In Chapter 4 a resolution of the dilemma is proposed in which a case is made for a limited use of DDT only for indoor spraying of huts and houses against malaria mosquitoes until such time as a less dangerous alternative for DDT is found that can be used as effectively in the fight against malaria. As such, this case is informed by the strong moral conviction that we cannot allow poor people of colour to die because of a general ban on the use of DDT. Further research on this ethical debate is encouraged.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Hierdie werkstuk is toegespits op 'n in-diepte analise van die pro- en kontra-posisies in die voortslepende, asook duur debat oor die gebruik van DDT al dan nie in die bekamping van Malaria. Ek argumenteer dat die dilemma rondom die vraag of DDT gebruik moet word of nie, aangewakker word deur politieke agendas, sensasie, oordrywing en foutiewe informasie van die eerste orde. Radikale omgewingsgesindes dring oënskynlik daarop aan dat die gebruik van DDT 'n hoof-oorsaak is van die agteruitgang van die omgewing, asook 'n primêre oorsaak van dood onder wild en mense. Erger nog, dit wil voorkom of heelwat Westerse mense onder die indruk is dat muskiete nie werklik soveel menslike lyding kan veroorsaak as wat voorgegee word nie, en dat malaria eerder veroorsaak word deur 'n sekere soort plantvorm van lewe, of selfs deur 'n virus. Die voorstaanders van DDT, aan die ander kant, is klaarblyklik oortuig dat DDT 'n redder van die mensdom is, en argumenteer dat die gruwels wat geassosieer word met DDT 'n grondelose oordrywing is, aangesien dit nie deur wetenskaplike ondersoek gesteun word nie. Voorstaanders van DDT glo verder dat enige stof wat in oormaat gebruik word, die dood kan veroorsaak, selfs gewone tafelsout. In hierdie werkstuk word albei hierdie posisies krities bestudeer en bespreek. Op grond van 'n historiese oorsig in Hoofstuk 1 oor die gebruik van DDT, en die ontstaan van die debat oor DDT na aanleiding van Rachel Carson se Silent Spring (1962), word Hoofstuk: 2 gewy aan 'n evaluasie van sewe basiese argumente teen die gebruik van DDT, terwyl in Hoofstuk 3 ses argumente vir die gebruik van DDT oorweeg word. In Hoofstuk 4 word 'n voorstel gemaak vir die resolusie van die dilemma deur 'n saak uit te maak vir die beperkte gebruik van DDT, nl. slegs vir binneshuise gebruik in hutte en huise teen malaria-muskiete tot tyd en wyl 'n minder gevaarlike alternatief vir DDT gevind word wat net so effektief sal wees in die stryd teen malaria. As sulks word hierdie studie gerugsteun deur die sterk morele oortuiging dat ons nie kan toelaat dat mense van kleur sterf as gevolg van 'n algemene verbod op die gebruik van DDT nie. Verdere navorsing oor hierdie etiese debat word aangemoedig.
Chan, Kit Yan. "Dietary exposure, human body loadings, and health risk assessment of persistent organic pollutants at two major electronic waste recycling sites in China." HKBU Institutional Repository, 2008. http://repository.hkbu.edu.hk/etd_ra/943.
Full textMmualefe, Lesego Cecilia. "Sample preparation for pesticide analysis in water and sediments a case study of the Okavango Delta, Botswana." Thesis, Rhodes University, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1005006.
Full textMcDougal, Rebecca, and n/a. "DDT residue degradation by soil bacteria." University of Otago. Department of Microbiology & Immunology, 2007. http://adt.otago.ac.nz./public/adt-NZDU20070914.142931.
Full textSiu, Ka-yan Sky, and 蕭加欣. "DDT as a malarial vector control method and its potential risks to human reproductive health and neonatal development." Thesis, The University of Hong Kong (Pokfulam, Hong Kong), 2007. http://hub.hku.hk/bib/B3972458X.
Full textMedeiros, Louise de Souza [UNESP]. "Toxidade aguda e risco ambiental do inseticida teflubenzuron para Daphnia magna, Lemna minor e Poecilia reticulata." Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/86698.
Full textConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
Os agrotóxicos aplicados nas áreas agrícolas podem ser carreados, por diversos mecanismos, até os corpos d’água da rede hidrográfica. Além disso, estes produtos são comumente utilizados na aqüicultura para o controle de parasitoses. O teflubenzuron (TFB) é um inseticida registrado em alguns países da Europa para o controle de parasitas de peixes. Os possíveis efeitos tóxicos e risco ambiental do TFB podem ser avaliados inicialmente em condições de laboratório por meio de testes de toxicidade aguda com organismos-teste eleitos internacionalmente. Os objetivos deste trabalho foram avaliar a toxicidade aguda e o risco de intoxicação ambiental do uso agrícola e em aqüicultura do TFB, com base nos valores de CE50 e CL50 estimados em testes com Daphnia magna, Lemna minor e Poecilia reticulata, utilizados como organismos bioindicadores. Os testes de ecotoxicidade aguda foram realizados de acordo com normas nacionais e internacionais para estas espécies. A CE50-48h estimada para D. magna foi 0,00026 mg.L- 1, o que caracteriza este inseticida como altamente tóxico para esta espécie. Para L. minor, a CE50-7d estimada foi 1.176,16 mg.L-1, e para P. reticulata CL50-96h, 2.707,87 mg.L- 1, que classificam o TFB como praticamente não-tóxico para estas duas espécies. Devido à alta toxicidade do TFB para daphnídeos, mesmo em pequenas contaminações, pode causar desequilíbrio na cadeia alimentar aquática. Para minimizar o risco ambiental, o TFB pode ser utilizado de forma controlada e diluído em quantidades restritas de água.
The pesticides used in agriculture areas can be transported to water bodies of the local hydrographic basin in several ways. Moreover, these chemicals are commonly used in aquaculture to fish parasite control. The teflubenzuron (TFB) is a registered insecticide in some European countries to this use. The possible effects of the TFB and environmental risk can be evaluated initially in laboratory conditions by tests of acute toxicity with internationally elected organisms. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the acute toxicity and the environmental risk due to agriculture and aquaculture use of TFB, based on the values of EC50 and LC50 estimated in tests with Daphnia magna, Lemna minor and Poecilia reticulata, internationally used as bioindicators organisms. The acute ecotoxicity tests were performed in accordance with national and international standards for these species. The EC50-48h estimated to D. magna was 0,00026 mg.L-1, which characterizes that as very highly toxic insecticide for this species. For L. minor, EC50-7d was estimated 1.176,16 mg.L-1, and P. reticulata LC50-96h, 2.707,87 mg.L-1, which classified the TFB as practically non-toxic to these species. Due to the high toxicity of the TFB to daphnids, even in little contamination, can cause a loss of equilibrium in the aquatic food chain. To minimize the environmental risk, the TFB can be used in a controlled way and diluted in limited quantities of water.
Souza, Jaqueline Pérola [UNESP]. "Toxicidade aguda e risco ambiental do diflubenzuron para Daphnia magna, Poecilia reticulata e Lemna minor na ausência e presença de sedimento." Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/86694.
Full textConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)
O inseticida diflubenzuron (DFB), comercializado como Dimilin®, é empregado em pisciculturas no tratamento de ecotoparasitoses em peixes. Este composto inibe a síntese de quitina, componente do exoesqueleto dos parasitas. A utilização deste inseticida se deve à sua baixa toxicidade aos peixes e eficácia no controle dos ectoparasitas. Porém, no ambiente aquático o DFB pode ser tóxico à espécies sensíveis e não-alvos, a concentração empregada no tratamento das ectoparasitoses é de 2 mg.L-1. Os objetivos deste estudo foram avaliar a toxicidade do DFB para as espécies de Daphnia magna, Poecilia reticulata e Lemna minor, classificar o produto quanto à sua toxicidade e risco ambiental e avaliar o efeito do sedimento na biodisponibilidade do DFB na água. Os organismos-teste foram submetidos a concentrações crescentes do inseticida em salas climatizadas do Laboratório de Ecotoxicologia da FCAV-UNESP. Os testes com D. magna foram realizados em volume de 10 mL a 20° C e cinco organismos neonatos por concentração, durante 48 horas na presença e ausência de sedimento. Os peixes (P. reticulata) foram expostos às concentrações do DFB por 96 horas em testes na presença e ausência de sedimento. O volume final foi de 3000 mL e cinco animais por concentração à 25° C. As plantas de L. minor foram expostas ao DFB por sete dias na presença e ausência de sedimento. O volume final foi de 100 mL e 12 frondes por concentração à 24° C. Os testes foram realizados com três réplicas incluindo o controle. As CE50-48h calculadas para D. magna foram de 0,56 μg.L-1 e 1,51 μg.L-1 na ausência e presença de sedimento respectivamente; as CL50-96h para P. reticulata foram 152,00 mg.L-1 e 277,83 mg.L-1 na ausência e presença de sedimento respectivamente; e as CE50-7dias para L. minor foram 459,50 mg.L-1 e 698,25 mg.L-1 na ausência e presença de sedimento respectivamente...
The insecticide diflubenzuron (DFB), marketed as Dimilin®, is used in fish farms to treat ectoparasites in fishes. This compound inhibits the chitin synthesis, exoskeleton component of the parasites. The use of this insecticide is due to its low toxicity for fish and effectiveness in the control of ectoparasites. However, the DFB in the aquatic environmental can be toxic to sensitive species and non-targed, the concentration used in the treatment of ectoparasites is 2 mg.L-1. The aims of this study were to evaluate the toxicity of the DFB for the species of Daphnia magna, Poecilia reticulata and Lemna minor, classify the product as to their toxicity and environmental risk and evaluate the effect of sediment on the bioavailability of the DFB in the water. The organisms-test were submitted to increasing concentrations of insecticide in air conditioned rooms of the Laboratory of Ecotoxicology FCAV-UNESP. Tests with D. magna were performed in volume of 10 mL at 20° C and five organisms neonates (6 and 24 hours of age) in each concentration, for 48 hours in the presence and absence of sediment. Fishes (P. reticulata) were exposed to concentrations of the DFB for 96 hours in tests in the presence and absence of sediment. The final volume was 3000 mL and five animals per concentration to 25° C. The plants of L. minor were exposed to the DFB for seven days in the presence and absence of sediment. The final volume was 100 mL and 12 fronds by concentration to 24° C. The tests were performed with three repetitions incluing the control. The EC50-48h estimeds for D. magna were 0.56 and 1.51 μg.L-1 in the absence and presence of sediment respectively; the LC50-96h for P. reticulata were 152.00 mg.L-1 and 277.83 mg.L-1 in the absence and presence of sediment respectively; and the EC50-7dias to L. minor were 459.50 mg.L-1 and 698.25 mg.L-1 in the absence and presence of sediment respectively...(Complete abstract, click electronic access below)
Medeiros, Louise de Souza. "Toxidade aguda e risco ambiental do inseticida teflubenzuron para Daphnia magna, Lemna minor e Poecilia reticulata /." Jaboticabal : [s.n.], 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/86698.
Full textBanca: Julio Vicente Lombardi
Banca: Robinson Antonio Pitelli
Resumo: Os agrotóxicos aplicados nas áreas agrícolas podem ser carreados, por diversos mecanismos, até os corpos d'água da rede hidrográfica. Além disso, estes produtos são comumente utilizados na aqüicultura para o controle de parasitoses. O teflubenzuron (TFB) é um inseticida registrado em alguns países da Europa para o controle de parasitas de peixes. Os possíveis efeitos tóxicos e risco ambiental do TFB podem ser avaliados inicialmente em condições de laboratório por meio de testes de toxicidade aguda com organismos-teste eleitos internacionalmente. Os objetivos deste trabalho foram avaliar a toxicidade aguda e o risco de intoxicação ambiental do uso agrícola e em aqüicultura do TFB, com base nos valores de CE50 e CL50 estimados em testes com Daphnia magna, Lemna minor e Poecilia reticulata, utilizados como organismos bioindicadores. Os testes de ecotoxicidade aguda foram realizados de acordo com normas nacionais e internacionais para estas espécies. A CE50-48h estimada para D. magna foi 0,00026 mg.L- 1, o que caracteriza este inseticida como altamente tóxico para esta espécie. Para L. minor, a CE50-7d estimada foi 1.176,16 mg.L-1, e para P. reticulata CL50-96h, 2.707,87 mg.L- 1, que classificam o TFB como praticamente não-tóxico para estas duas espécies. Devido à alta toxicidade do TFB para daphnídeos, mesmo em pequenas contaminações, pode causar desequilíbrio na cadeia alimentar aquática. Para minimizar o risco ambiental, o TFB pode ser utilizado de forma controlada e diluído em quantidades restritas de água.
Abstract: The pesticides used in agriculture areas can be transported to water bodies of the local hydrographic basin in several ways. Moreover, these chemicals are commonly used in aquaculture to fish parasite control. The teflubenzuron (TFB) is a registered insecticide in some European countries to this use. The possible effects of the TFB and environmental risk can be evaluated initially in laboratory conditions by tests of acute toxicity with internationally elected organisms. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the acute toxicity and the environmental risk due to agriculture and aquaculture use of TFB, based on the values of EC50 and LC50 estimated in tests with Daphnia magna, Lemna minor and Poecilia reticulata, internationally used as bioindicators organisms. The acute ecotoxicity tests were performed in accordance with national and international standards for these species. The EC50-48h estimated to D. magna was 0,00026 mg.L-1, which characterizes that as very highly toxic insecticide for this species. For L. minor, EC50-7d was estimated 1.176,16 mg.L-1, and P. reticulata LC50-96h, 2.707,87 mg.L-1, which classified the TFB as practically non-toxic to these species. Due to the high toxicity of the TFB to daphnids, even in little contamination, can cause a loss of equilibrium in the aquatic food chain. To minimize the environmental risk, the TFB can be used in a controlled way and diluted in limited quantities of water.
Mestre
Souza, Jaqueline Pérola. "Toxicidade aguda e risco ambiental do diflubenzuron para Daphnia magna, Poecilia reticulata e Lemna minor na ausência e presença de sedimento /." Jaboticabal : [s.n.], 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/86694.
Full textBanca: Julio Vicente Lombardi
Banca: Robinson Antonio Pitelli
Resumo: O inseticida diflubenzuron (DFB), comercializado como Dimilin®, é empregado em pisciculturas no tratamento de ecotoparasitoses em peixes. Este composto inibe a síntese de quitina, componente do exoesqueleto dos parasitas. A utilização deste inseticida se deve à sua baixa toxicidade aos peixes e eficácia no controle dos ectoparasitas. Porém, no ambiente aquático o DFB pode ser tóxico à espécies sensíveis e não-alvos, a concentração empregada no tratamento das ectoparasitoses é de 2 mg.L-1. Os objetivos deste estudo foram avaliar a toxicidade do DFB para as espécies de Daphnia magna, Poecilia reticulata e Lemna minor, classificar o produto quanto à sua toxicidade e risco ambiental e avaliar o efeito do sedimento na biodisponibilidade do DFB na água. Os organismos-teste foram submetidos a concentrações crescentes do inseticida em salas climatizadas do Laboratório de Ecotoxicologia da FCAV-UNESP. Os testes com D. magna foram realizados em volume de 10 mL a 20° C e cinco organismos neonatos por concentração, durante 48 horas na presença e ausência de sedimento. Os peixes (P. reticulata) foram expostos às concentrações do DFB por 96 horas em testes na presença e ausência de sedimento. O volume final foi de 3000 mL e cinco animais por concentração à 25° C. As plantas de L. minor foram expostas ao DFB por sete dias na presença e ausência de sedimento. O volume final foi de 100 mL e 12 frondes por concentração à 24° C. Os testes foram realizados com três réplicas incluindo o controle. As CE50-48h calculadas para D. magna foram de 0,56 μg.L-1 e 1,51 μg.L-1 na ausência e presença de sedimento respectivamente; as CL50-96h para P. reticulata foram 152,00 mg.L-1 e 277,83 mg.L-1 na ausência e presença de sedimento respectivamente; e as CE50-7dias para L. minor foram 459,50 mg.L-1 e 698,25 mg.L-1 na ausência e presença de sedimento respectivamente...(Resumo completo, clicar acesso eletrônico abaixo)
Abstract: The insecticide diflubenzuron (DFB), marketed as Dimilin®, is used in fish farms to treat ectoparasites in fishes. This compound inhibits the chitin synthesis, exoskeleton component of the parasites. The use of this insecticide is due to its low toxicity for fish and effectiveness in the control of ectoparasites. However, the DFB in the aquatic environmental can be toxic to sensitive species and non-targed, the concentration used in the treatment of ectoparasites is 2 mg.L-1. The aims of this study were to evaluate the toxicity of the DFB for the species of Daphnia magna, Poecilia reticulata and Lemna minor, classify the product as to their toxicity and environmental risk and evaluate the effect of sediment on the bioavailability of the DFB in the water. The organisms-test were submitted to increasing concentrations of insecticide in air conditioned rooms of the Laboratory of Ecotoxicology FCAV-UNESP. Tests with D. magna were performed in volume of 10 mL at 20° C and five organisms neonates (6 and 24 hours of age) in each concentration, for 48 hours in the presence and absence of sediment. Fishes (P. reticulata) were exposed to concentrations of the DFB for 96 hours in tests in the presence and absence of sediment. The final volume was 3000 mL and five animals per concentration to 25° C. The plants of L. minor were exposed to the DFB for seven days in the presence and absence of sediment. The final volume was 100 mL and 12 fronds by concentration to 24° C. The tests were performed with three repetitions incluing the control. The EC50-48h estimeds for D. magna were 0.56 and 1.51 μg.L-1 in the absence and presence of sediment respectively; the LC50-96h for P. reticulata were 152.00 mg.L-1 and 277.83 mg.L-1 in the absence and presence of sediment respectively; and the EC50-7dias to L. minor were 459.50 mg.L-1 and 698.25 mg.L-1 in the absence and presence of sediment respectively...(Complete abstract, click electronic access below)
Mestre
Books on the topic "DDT (Insecticide) Environmental aspects"
Canada. Commercial Chemicals Evaluation Branch. DDT: Scientific justification. Ottawa, Ont: Environment Canada, 1997.
Find full textRinella, Joseph F. Persistence of the DDT pesticide inthe Yakima River Basin, Washington. (Reston, VA): U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, 1993.
Find full textRinella, Joseph F. Persistence of the DDT pesticide in the Yakima River Basin, Washington. [Reston, VA]: U.S. Dept. of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, 1993.
Find full textThe true story of DDT, PCB, and Dioxin. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Chemiczne, 2005.
Find full textRoger, Bate, and Liberty Institute (New Delhi, India), eds. When politics kills: Malaria and the DDT story. New Delhi: Liberty Institute, 2000.
Find full textRogowski, David. Verifying 303(d) DDT/DDE and Dieldrin listings for the upper Yakima River. [Olympia, Wash.]: Washington State Dept. of Ecology, 2000.
Find full textSerdar, Dave. DDT in Osoyoos Lake fish. Olympia, WA: Washington State Dept. of Ecology, Environmental Assessment Program, Watershed Ecology Section, 1998.
Find full textThe role of science in environmental policy making: Hearing before the Committee on Environment and Public Works, United States Senate, One Hundred Ninth Congress, first session, September 28, 2005. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 2008.
Find full textPeterschmidt, Mark. Lower Okanogan DDT PCB: Water quality implementation plan (detailed implementation plan). Yakima, WA: Washington State Dept. of Ecology, 2006.
Find full textPeterschmidt, Mark. Lower Okanogan DDT PCB: Water quality implementation plan (detailed implementation plan). Yakima, WA: Washington State Dept. of Ecology, 2006.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "DDT (Insecticide) Environmental aspects"
Wurster, Charles F. "EDF, Barely an Organization, Getting Its Act Together." In DDT Wars. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190219413.003.0010.
Full textWurster, Charles F. "Time to Go After the Feds." In DDT Wars. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190219413.003.0012.
Full text"Factors That Influence Toxicity." In Environmental Toxicology, edited by Sigmund F. Zakrzewski. Oxford University Press, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195148114.003.0009.
Full text