Academic literature on the topic 'Data commons'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Data commons.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Data commons"
Grossman, Robert L., Jonathan R. Dry, Sean E. Hanlon, Donald J. Johann, Anand Kolatkar, Jerry S. H. Lee, Christopher Meyer, Lea Salvatore, Walt Wells, and Lauren Leiman. "BloodPAC Data Commons for Liquid Biopsy Data." JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics, no. 5 (April 2021): 479–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/cci.20.00179.
Full textFedorov, A., W. Longabaugh, D. Pot, D. Clunie, S. Pieper, R. Lewis, H. Aerts, et al. "NCI Imaging Data Commons." International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics 111, no. 3 (November 2021): e101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.07.495.
Full textFedorov, Andrey, William J. R. Longabaugh, David Pot, David A. Clunie, Steve Pieper, Hugo J. W. L. Aerts, André Homeyer, et al. "NCI Imaging Data Commons." Cancer Research 81, no. 16 (June 15, 2021): 4188–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-21-0950.
Full textHughes, LaRon, Robert L. Grossman, Zachary Flamig, Andrew Prokhorenkov, Michael Lukowski, Michael Fitzsimons, Tara Lichtenberg, and Yajing Tang. "Harmonization of clinical data across Gen3 data commons." Journal of Clinical Oncology 37, no. 15_suppl (May 20, 2019): e18094-e18094. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.e18094.
Full textHeath, Allison P., Vincent Ferretti, Stuti Agrawal, Maksim An, James C. Angelakos, Renuka Arya, Rosita Bajari, et al. "The NCI Genomic Data Commons." Nature Genetics 53, no. 3 (February 22, 2021): 257–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41588-021-00791-5.
Full textSpichtinger, Daniel. "Uncommon Commons? Creative Commons Licencing in Horizon 2020 Data Management Plans." International Journal of Digital Curation 17, no. 1 (September 20, 2022): 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v17i1.840.
Full textStein, Lincoln D., Bartha M. Knoppers, Peter Campbell, Gad Getz, and Jan O. Korbel. "Data analysis: Create a cloud commons." Nature 523, no. 7559 (July 2015): 149–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/523149a.
Full textSchofield, Paul N., Janan Eppig, Eva Huala, Martin Hrabe de Angelis, Mark Harvey, Duncan Davidson, Tom Weaver, et al. "Sustaining the Data and Bioresource Commons." Science 330, no. 6004 (October 28, 2010): 592–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1191506.
Full textPlana, Alejandro, Brian Furner, Monica Palese, Nicole Dussault, Suzi Birz, Luca Graglia, Maura Kush, et al. "Pediatric Cancer Data Commons: Federating and Democratizing Data for Childhood Cancer Research." JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics, no. 5 (October 2021): 1034–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/cci.21.00075.
Full textVolchenboum, Samuel L., Suzanne M. Cox, Allison Heath, Adam Resnick, Susan L. Cohn, and Robert Grossman. "Data Commons to Support Pediatric Cancer Research." American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book, no. 37 (May 2017): 746–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/edbk_175029.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Data commons"
Sharad, Chakravarthy Namindi. "Public Commons for Geospatial Data: A Conceptual Model." Fogler Library, University of Maine, 2003. http://www.library.umaine.edu/theses/pdf/SharadCN2003.pdf.
Full textMcCurry, David B. "Provenance Tracking in a Commons of Geographic Data." Fogler Library, University of Maine, 2007. http://www.library.umaine.edu/theses/pdf/McCurryDB2007.pdf.
Full textJohn, Shirley Diane. "The analysis of House of Commons' division list data." Thesis, University of Bath, 1989. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.235796.
Full textPinto, Evelyn Cristina. "\"Repensando os commons na comunicação científica\"." Universidade de São Paulo, 2006. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/45/45134/tde-07052007-092617/.
Full textRecent studies done by Benkler, Lessig, Boyle, Hess and Ostrom look at the concept of commons again however, this time in relation to information in general more specifically to scientific information. In this study, we focused on the cooperative character of scientific research, the importance of transparency and neutrality to access the scientific commons. The concept of commons is highly useful to focus on every scientific article that has already been published in print or digitally. This allows studies through several multidisciplines and finally emphasizes the dynamic of scientific communities around the world. In each commons of information, the higher the distribution of knowledge, the more dynamic and efficient the process of the evolution of this information. Technology of the press has been key in the divulging of information and its expansion marked a revolution in knowledge and culture in our civilization. Digital technology has shown more efficiency. Its implementation into bits is closer to the non-rival nature of the ideas than other technologies used to preserve it and used to distribute information. In our work, we realized that the science of commons should be enriched through cooperative practices and open access to scientific results. We also realized that digital technology in scientific commons improves distribution of scholarly knowledge and the dynamic evolution of scientific ideas so the science development should be even more efficient and faster. The digital revolution has been used to create a free environment of circulation of ideas and it has also been used to control certain things. On one side, computational code has been implemented to allow access just for people who pay for the service. On the other hand, online journals publishing and other alternative forms of disseminating scientific knowledge have been proliferated. The decreasing budget of libraries, the increasing cost of journal subscriptions and the increasing restrictions applied by intellectual property has enclosed the free nature of scientific ideas and it has put Scholarly Communication into a crisis. We are in the middle of a transitional phase, where legal, technological, social and economic aspects of scientific publishing have being renegotiated. We inserted our analyses in a larger context, the Scholarly Communication paradigm. This supports a larger study about the complex questions of our subject, analyzing the technological, legal, social and economic aspects of a possible transition to the open access publishing model. This new publishing model is so interesting that some initiatives have started social movements pertaining to it. Nowadays, there are many tests and publishing models especially in this line of work. We focused on the open access model in scientific results, its advantages, the difficulties of its establishment and how it has been developed. Finally, we propose that the creation of an open access digital libraries ecosystem specialized in every scientific field. Our staring models are services such as: arXiv, CiteSeer and Google Scholar. Among our conclusions, we have realized that following this models stated above, digital libraries can enhance the dynamic of circulation, generation, transformation and renovation of the scientific knowledge.
Alliot, Sandie. "Essai de qualification de la notion de données à caractère personnel." Thesis, Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018UBFCB001.
Full textPersonal data has undergone a major change which justifies a new study of this notion. This particular data is at the heart of the digital economy and thus stirs numerous claims. What is at stake here is to try to work out a balance between different claims such as managing operators' will of appropriation and protecting people concerned by the data, for example. This is why it is essential to find a precise definition and adequate qualifications of personal data to find a balance between the various interests. The thesis will focus on the necessity to adopt a new vision of personal data, to show its current characteristics so as to manage it efficiently
Kang, Heechan. "Essays on methodologies in contingent valuation and the sustainable management of common pool resources." Columbus, Ohio : Ohio State University, 2006. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc%5Fnum=osu1141240444.
Full textHodges, Glenn A. "Designing a common interchange format for unit data using the Command and Control information exchange data model (C2IEDM) and XSLT." Thesis, Monterey, Calif. : Springfield, Va. : Naval Postgraduate School ; Available from National Technical Information Service, 2004. http://library.nps.navy.mil/uhtbin/hyperion/04Sep%5FHodges.pdf.
Full textThesis advisor(s): Curtis Blais, Don Brutzman. Includes bibliographical references (p. 95-98). Also available online.
Chen, Te-Ching. "Estimating common odds ratio with missing data." College Park, Md. : University of Maryland, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/1903/2725.
Full textThesis research directed by: Mathematical Statistics. Title from t.p. of PDF. Includes bibliographical references. Published by UMI Dissertation Services, Ann Arbor, Mich. Also available in paper.
Slocumb, Calvin D. "Common data sharing system infrastructure : an object-oriented approach /." Thesis, Monterey, Calif. : Springfield, Va. : Naval Postgraduate School ; Available from National Technical Information Service, 1995. http://handle.dtic.mil/100.2/ADA304500.
Full text"June 1995." Thesis advisor(s): Orin E. Marvel. Includes bibliographical references. Also available online.
Doldirina, Catherine. "The common good and access to remote sensing data." Thesis, McGill University, 2011. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=104766.
Full textCette thèse se veut une recherche du régime adéquat de protection des données de télédétections et de l'information. Son argument, en faveur de la nécessité d'en sécuriser l'accès, se base sur leurs caractéristiques techniques et sociétales. En prenant comme exemples les États-Unis et l'Europe, cette recherche compare l'efficacité de régimes légaux pertinents telle que la protection de la propriété intellectuelle, en particulier celle du droit d'auteur d'une part, et la régulation du secteur public de l'information, de l'autre. Sur la base de cette analyse, ce travail soutient qu'une marchandisation non nécessaire des données de télédétections par des régimes de protection, telle que celui de la propriété privée, vont influencer défavorablement leurs utilités ainsi que leurs valeurs. Le principe du partage, basé sur les théories de la propriété commune et du bien commun, est proposé comme étant la solution pour éviter de tels scénarios. Sa viabilité et son efficacité résident dans l'accent mis entre l'équilibre public et privé dans l'accomplissement du bien commun d'une vie meilleure, qui se manifeste aujourd'hui notamment par l'abondance de l'information. Le principe de partage, qui a survécu à des siècles de pensée philosophique, est toujours pertinent aujourd'hui, particulièrement en ce qui concerne l'implantation de régime de protection et de distribution des données de télédétections, tel que les exemples donnés sur l'infrastructure de l'information géographique et le "Geographic Earth Observation System of Systems" le montrent. La métaphore qui présente l'information comme une voie navigable reprend la discussion relative à la pertinence du principe de partage et accentue l'aspect indispensable d'une approche orientée vers l'accès aux données, préférable à la régulation des relations sur la génération, la distribution et l'utilisation de données de télédétections et de l'information.
Books on the topic "Data commons"
Barnes, Jon I. The value of non-agricultural land use in some Namibian communal areas: A data base for planning. Windhoek, Namibia: Directorate of Environmental Affairs, Ministry of Environment and Tourism, 1995.
Find full textBritain, Great. Information technology: Government's response to the first report of the House of Commons Trade and Industry Committee : 1988-89 session. London: H.M.S.O., 1989.
Find full textThe future of ideas: The fate of the commons in a connected world. New York: Random House, 2001.
Find full text1960-, Lachman Beth E., ed. Installation mapping enables many missions: The benefits of and barriers to sharing geospatial data assets. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2007.
Find full textData sharing using a common data architecture. New York: Wiley, 1994.
Find full textCanada. Parliament. House of Commons. Standing Committee on Human Rights and the Status of Disabled Persons. Privacy, where do we draw the line?: Report of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Human Rights and the Status of Persons with Disabilities. [Ottawa: Queen's Printer for Canada], 1997.
Find full textCanada. Parliament. House of Commons. Standing Committee on Human Rights and the Status of Disabled Persons. Privacy, where do we draw the line?: Report of the House of Commons Standing Committee on Human Rights and the Status of Persons with Disabilities. Ottawa: Public Works and Govt. Services Canada, 1997.
Find full textScotland, Audit, ed. Common data, common sense: Modernising information management in councils. Edinburgh: Audit Scotland, 2000.
Find full textGreat Britain. Department of Energy and Climate Change. Government response to the House of Commons Science and Technology Committee 8th report of session 2009-10: The disclosure of climate data from the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia. London: TSO, 2007.
Find full textJames, Llinas, ed. Multisensor data fusion. Boston: Artech House, 1990.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Data commons"
Cappello, Gianna, and Marianna Siino. "Building Youth Civic Engagement through Media Education and Educational Commons." In Educational Commons, 51–68. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51837-9_4.
Full textPurtova, Nadezhda. "Health Data for Common Good: Defining the Boundaries and Social Dilemmas of Data Commons." In Law, Governance and Technology Series, 177–210. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48342-9_10.
Full textGarcía-Gasco Romero, Marcos. "Personal Data: The New Black Gold." In Security in the Global Commons and Beyond, 171–82. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67973-6_12.
Full textBeckwith, Richard, John Sherry, and David Prendergast. "Data Flow in the Smart City: Open Data Versus the Commons." In The Hackable City, 205–21. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2694-3_11.
Full textContreras, Jorge L. "Optimizing Access Policies for Big Data Repositories: Latency Variables and the Genome Commons." In Studies in Big Data, 201–15. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30265-2_9.
Full textRaymond, Anjanette H., and Scott Shackelford. "Nudging the Ostroms' Vision of the Commons on Polycentric Governance into the Digital Environment." In Global Digital Data Governance, 21–33. London: Routledge, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003388418-3.
Full textOnsrud, Harlan, Gilberto Camara, James Campbell, and Narnindi Sharad Chakravarthy. "Public Commons of Geographic Data: Research and Development Challenges." In Geographic Information Science, 223–38. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30231-5_15.
Full textWilson, Anna, Hannah Hamilton, Greg Singh, and Pat Lockley. "Open Is Not Enough: Designing for a Networked Data Commons." In Research in Networked Learning, 49–66. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42718-3_4.
Full textVameșu, Ancuța, Cristina Barna, and Irina Opincaru. "From public ownership back to commons." In Providing public goods and commons, 55–74. Liège: CIRIEC, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.25518/ciriec.css1chap3.
Full textEvans, Barbara J. "Ethical standards for unconsented data access to build genomic and other medical information commons." In Routledge Handbook of the Study of the Commons, 294–307. Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2019.: Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315162782-22.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Data commons"
Greenway, Giles, Leonard Mack, Tobias Blanke, Mark Cote, and Tom Heath. "Towards a mobile social data commons." In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). IEEE, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/bigdata.2015.7363932.
Full textTarcea, Glenn, Brian Puchala, Tracy Berman, Giorgio Scorzelli, Valerio Pascucci, Michela Taufer, and John Allison. "The Materials Commons Data Repository." In 2022 IEEE 18th International Conference on e-Science (e-Science). IEEE, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/escience55777.2022.00060.
Full textBrinkmann, Alexander, Anna Primpeli, and Christian Bizer. "The Web Data Commons Schema.org Data Set Series." In WWW '23: The ACM Web Conference 2023. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3543873.3587331.
Full textErlinger, Christian, and Jens Bemme. "Linked Data für Bildrepositorien : Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons." In Bildarchive. Wissensordnungen - Arbeitspraktiken - Nutzungspotenziale. Institut für Sächsische Geschichte und Volkskunde, Dresden, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.25366/2022.60.
Full textVolchenboum, SL. "Creating an International Hodgkin Lymphoma Data Commons." In ISCAYAHL 2020. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701934.
Full textPeeters, Ralph, Alexander Brinkmann, and Christian Bizer. "The Web Data Commons Schema.org Table Corpora." In WWW '24: The ACM Web Conference 2024. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3589335.3651441.
Full textEom, Boyun, Sunhwan Lim, Young-Ho Suh, Sungpil Woo, Donghwan Park, and Chanwon Park. "Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Data Value Curation on AI-Data Commons." In 2021 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC). IEEE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ictc52510.2021.9620838.
Full textChan, Alan, Herbie Bradley, and Nitarshan Rajkumar. "Reclaiming the Digital Commons: A Public Data Trust for Training Data." In AIES '23: AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3600211.3604658.
Full textCox, Jenelys. "Understanding GDPR: Libraries, Repositories, & Privacy Policies." In Digital Commons Heartland Users Group 2018. Fort Hays State University, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.58809/ngrw4078.
Full textLim, Sunhwan, Young-Ho Suh, Donghwan Park, Sungpil Woo, and Chanwon Park. "Design of SW Framework for Trustworthy AI-Data Commons." In 2020 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC). IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ictc49870.2020.9289370.
Full textReports on the topic "Data commons"
Liang, Shaobo, Richard Bergman, and Hongmei Gu. Workflow for publishing forestry LCI data through the LCA commons: a case study. Madison, WI: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.2737/fpl-rn-364.
Full textDudoit, Alain. European common data spaces: a structuring initiative that is both necessary and adaptable to Canada. CIRANO, November 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.54932/skhp9567.
Full textSchoenwaelder, J., ed. Common YANG Data Types. RFC Editor, October 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/rfc6021.
Full textSchoenwaelder, J., ed. Common YANG Data Types. RFC Editor, July 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/rfc6991.
Full textDziurlaj, John. Micro Common Data Format Specification. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/nist.sp.1500-19.
Full textBeertema, P. Common DNS Data File Configuration Errors. RFC Editor, October 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.17487/rfc1537.
Full textWack, John P., Kim Brace, Sam Dana, Herb Deutsch, John Dziurlaj, Ian Piper, Don Rehill, Richard Rivello, and Sarah Whitt. Election Results Common Data Format Specification. National Institute of Standards and Technology, February 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/nist.sp.1500-100.
Full textWack, John. Election results common data format specification:. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, December 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/nist.sp.1500-100r2.
Full textDziurlaj, John. Ballot Definition Common Data Format Specification. Gaithersburg, MD: National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/nist.sp.1500-20.
Full textYoung, Stanley, Darcy Bullock, and Dennis So Ting Fong. Common Data Formats for Re-Identification and High-Resolution Data. Purdue University, December 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.5703/1288284316566.
Full text