Academic literature on the topic 'Cultural property – France'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Cultural property – France.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Cultural property – France"
Kerr, John. "The state of heritage and cultural property policing in England & Wales, France and Italy." European Journal of Criminology 17, no. 4 (October 1, 2018): 441–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1477370818803047.
Full textPaumgartner, Nikolaus Thaddäus, and Raphael Zingg. "The Rise of Safe Havens for Threatened Cultural Heritage." International Journal of Cultural Property 25, no. 3 (August 2018): 323–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0940739118000188.
Full textLEUCHTER, TYSON. "THE ILLIMITABLE RIGHT: DEBATING THE MEANING OF PROPERTY AND THEMARCHÉ À TERMEIN NAPOLEONIC FRANCE." Modern Intellectual History 15, no. 1 (March 28, 2016): 3–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1479244316000081.
Full textJakubowski, Olgierd. "Karnoprawna ochrona dziedzictwa kulturowego przed zniszczeniem w wybranych państwach europejskich – zarys zagadnienia." Studia Prawnoustrojowe, no. 44 (January 6, 2020): 153–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.31648/sp.4901.
Full textBellisari, Andrew. "The Art of Decolonization: The Battle for Algeria’s French Art, 1962–70." Journal of Contemporary History 52, no. 3 (October 17, 2016): 625–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022009416652715.
Full textRothfeld, Anne. "RETURNING LOOTED EUROPEAN LIBRARY COLLECTIONS: AN HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE OFFENBACH ARCHIVAL DEPOT, 1945–1948." RBM: A Journal of Rare Books, Manuscripts, and Cultural Heritage 6, no. 1 (March 1, 2005): 14–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/rbm.6.1.238.
Full textCox, Douglas. "“INALIENABLE” ARCHIVES: KOREAN ROYAL ARCHIVES AS FRENCH PROPERTY UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW." International Journal of Cultural Property 18, no. 4 (November 2011): 409–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0940739111000245.
Full textCœuré, Sophie. "Cultural Looting and Restitution at the Dawn of the Cold War: The French Recovery Missions in Eastern Europe." Journal of Contemporary History 52, no. 3 (November 23, 2016): 588–606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022009416658700.
Full textMiles, Margaret M. "Cicero's Prosecution of Gaius Verres: A Roman View of the Ethics of Acquisition of Art." International Journal of Cultural Property 11, no. 1 (January 2002): 28–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0940739102771567.
Full textKarrels, Nancy Caron. "Reconstructing a Wartime Journey: The Vollard-Fabiani Collection, 1940–1949." International Journal of Cultural Property 22, no. 4 (November 2015): 505–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0940739115000296.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Cultural property – France"
Kwon, Cherry. "La protection du patrimoine culturel : une comparaison entre la France et la Corée." Thesis, Paris 1, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014PA010321.
Full textCultural heritage is by its own nature an exposition of national identity as well as a symbol of sovereignty. Thus a comparative study on it would give rise to implications beyond the relevant institutions. The cultural heritage system of France, a culmination of the Revolution, has indeed held an enduring reputation as the most sophisticated one in the world. Korea, on the other side of the globe, has been pursuing ambitious reform measures, ever since the enactment on the Protection of Cultural Property in 1962. Emphasis in the present work has been placed on the cultural heritage and the land. The reason is that the unique relationship of the two is believed to be fertile ground for comparison. Traditional attachment in France to the land in case of tangible or material cultural “patrimoine” would very well bring about fresh perspectives to Korea. It is to be noted that those cultural properties, not classified as “protected” ones thus falling out of the umbrella, are also dealt with rather extensively. One may find that state intervention or engagement is much more conspicuous in case of cultural heritage, as compared to other areas of culture. Decentralization epitomizes the administration of cultural “patrimoine” in France since 1980s, whereas role of the central government dominates in Korea, although foundations, associations and MECENATs are on the rise in numbers and activities. Lastly the task of interest-coordinations are highlighted in every facet of the protection : namely public v. private, national v. regional/local, past/present generation v. future generation
Voizard, Karl-Henri. "L'Etat culturel et le droit : approche juridique des interventions culturelles de l'Etat en France." Thesis, Paris 2, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011PA020038.
Full textThis thesis assumes that legal analysis should enlighten the global meaning of cultural actions of the State. Beyond the wide variety of objects concerned, rules composing law oncultural activities of public authorities show common features. Their review shows that principles they follow draw the outlines of a figure: the one of the cultural State. The demonstration is organized in two phases. It is first shown what legal mechanisms are concerned when conventional means of cultural interventions of the State are focused tostrengthen national cohesion: the State produces institutions in order to link people withculture and unite around it. In the same time, it protects the property and agents necessaryto assure these institutions in the long term. It is then shown that the State reforms and cultural law changes did not really bend the initial logic: the legal forms of action are certainly more nuanced, but they change the State culture more than they challenge it
Terrier, Emilie. "Vers une nouvelle figure du droit d'auteur. L'affirmation d'une logique publique culturelle." Thesis, Poitiers, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018POIT3008.
Full textThe fields of copyright and culture seem to be guided by different logics. French copyright law is known to be author-oriented whereas the cultural field is guided by public interest. The aim of our study however is to prove this assumption wrong by demonstrating that both of these logics tend to intertwine. The intangible resources are nowadays a major lever of public action. Reciprocally, in the copyright law system, there is an important dialogue between public interest and author-centered philosophy. The common interest dimension goes way back to the very creation of copyright law. The digital environment contributes, nevertheless, to the raising of new questions about the virtues of copyright law. Those structural movements have a major impact on copyright law. Rather than address the matter of the assertion of a cultural public logic in copyright through the conflicts that can be raised by the meeting of these normative fields, we want to demonstrate the appearance of a new copyright figure. The encounter between the public imperatives and the copyright law creates a new space within the copyright system itself. This hybrid space is composed of both private and public law
Wagener, Noé. "Les prestations publiques en faveur de la protection du patrimoine culturel." Thesis, Paris 11, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014PA111007.
Full textThe thesis has made the methodological choice of reducing the action of the State for the protection of cultural heritage to a simple series of "services". Taking the neoliberal perspective literally, it intends to study all State interventions in this area, regardless of the shapes they assume (enactment of regulation and provision of services). In doing so, the scientific challenge of the thesis is to get to determine why the State acts in cultural heritage, and more specifically why it acts in a certain way rather than another. This functional interrogation, rarely asked by lawyers in France, is of interest as it questions the particular ways in which specific categories of law help to produce - much more than to describe - the choice of a particular cultural heritage protection. Thus, the diachronic observation of services, since the French Revolution, shows that on multiple occasions, these services have found, in all seriousness, their source outside the State, specifically in a community right. Also, beyond a progressive etatization process (which is not in itself very original), a complex reversal of the relation of the State to the society emerges : during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, the State frees itself from the society, helped by a massive work of doctrinal reconceptualizations. It is only between World War I and World War II, after the failure of theories of social law, that the legal explanation of State services for the protection of cultural heritage is finally locked in the antagonism between the authority of the State and fundamental rights
Behdad, Bahareh. "La série Le Petit Nicolas de René Goscinny (France) et Les Aventures de Madjid de Houchang Morâdi–Kermâni (Iran) : Regards croisés sur deux oeuvres patrimoniales en littérature de la jeunesse." Thesis, Le Mans, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014LEMA3007/document.
Full textDespite a relatively short history, children’s literature has already his classics: a certain number of editorial works constitutes a patrimony which remains vivacious and continues to be read by new generations who nourish and inspire more contemporary productions. The concept “patrimony” has therefore pertinence and a particular definition in the domain of“children’s literature”. That is what is explored from a crossed study of two literary works, one French and the other Persian, which have in common humor and statement in the first person singular: The Little Nicolas of Rene Goscinny and The Adventures of Majid of Houshang Moradi-Kermani. These patrimonial works are considered from a triple point of view: that of their national reception, their broadcasting and their commercial exploitation; that of their aesthetical intrinsic value; that of their reception in different cultures through translation and therefore by their uniqueness and universality.This qualitative research emphasize on French and Persian sources and on a deep study of questionnaires meant to readers and based on the corpus of the two works and their translations. From this perspective, we refer, for the question ofreception, to the works of Ferrier and Louichon, for the creation, to the theories of Maingueneau, Chambers and Chlovski and for the translations, to those of O’Sullivan, Chevrel, Vinay and Darbelnet
Restrepo-Navarro, Paulina. "Le droit du patrimoine culturel colombien à l´épreuve de la restitution internationale des biens archéologiques : Quelle approche vis-à-vis des vestiges qui se trouvent à l´étranger ?" Thesis, Paris 11, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013PA111007.
Full textIt has been more than twenty-five years since Colombia State ratified the 1970 Unesco Convention and one year later it ratified the 1995 Unidroit Convention. It is now relevant to evaluate Colombia’s cultural heritage law and its perception of the issues surrounding the international trade of archaeological objects and ownership transfer. If archaeological antiquities belong unmistakably to the Nation since 1991, their constitutional protection does not satisfy the nationalistic policy this source country would like to lead.The evaluation of cultural heritage law is a double issue. On the one hand, there is the problem of how the domestic laws are applied to archaeological objects within the national territory. On the other hand, there is the difficulty of implementing domestic legislation when the antiquities are abroad. It is therefore a question of assessing if Colombia’s cultural heritage legislation has a framework that is clear and precise enough to allow the State to succeed in its claims and of defining to what extent it can be reinforced by foreign authorities and courts.Furthermore, international treaties adopted in this field since the second half of the twentieth century seem insufficient to meet Colombia´s concerns. Practice has shown that the international fight against illicit trade is closely bound to domestic laws, either that of the requesting State or of the requested State. The litigation strategies that can be brought before French authorities and courts have been studied as an example.These conflicts concern several actors: States, indigenous people, art dealers and museums. Their different level of interests reveal the complexity of the relationships that can be built among these antiquities considered, according to the stakeholders’ point of view, as identity, sacred, artistic or scientific objects.Finally, the recent development of Colombia’s cultural heritage legislation seems to challenge the country’s relation with its archaeological objects abroad
Daniel, Marko. "Art and propaganda : the battle for cultural property in the Spanish Civil War." Thesis, University of Essex, 1999. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.285847.
Full textGueydier, Pierre. "HADOPI comme expérimentation : récit d'une instrumentation de l'action publique." Thesis, Paris, ENMP, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014ENMP0072/document.
Full textThe High Authority for Transmission of Creative Works and Copyright Protection on the Internet (HADOPI) was adopted in 2009 with the mission to discipline acts of intellectual property infringement on the internet. The main purpose of this thesis is to produce an empirical account of the creation of this new law (an instrument of public action as an experience of internet governance and internauts). While it is a somewhat minor public issue, illegal downloading creates a myriad of issues across the framework of public action, historically recognised as literary and artistic property rights. The political effects of the digital age, deterritorialised consequences of globalisation, liberalism and technology necessitate a rethinking of the relationship between sovereignty and discipline. The gridlock between DRM; supranational norms; the hijacking of content by users; the collective power of rights holders; the unalterable nature of intellectual property and the militants for free access to culture; the public authorities had to invent and innovate an instrument of public action. The goal of which is to extend an added value of the French nation state: the defense of the cultural exception. Are internauts governable? In constructing a representation of the internet user, through promoting obedience, and by modifying behaviour through incremental incitation (from being informed to being penalised) and by producing as much unwanted behaviour, the HADOPI has effected the political result of inaugurating the first ever attempt (albeit fragile, yet pioneering) to govern the internet and internauts
Deiller, Nicolas. "Le régime juridique des biens cultuels : vers une nouvelle approche du droit des cultes en France ?" Thesis, Bourgogne Franche-Comté, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018UBFCF007/document.
Full textCultual goods, and more generally the cults themselves, have undergone many changes in their legal system. To be interested in the legal regime of the cultual goods is necessarily to study the system of cults, as a whole. Starting from the management of the material goods of the different cults, we propose an analysis of the current law of religions. In 1905, the law on the separation of churches and the state was passed. An eminently political law, it aims to secularize public institutions and proposes a new material organization for the different cults present on the national territory. In order to replace the former public establishments of the cult concordats, cult associations, private, are set up: they are intended to represent the cult and to manage its material goods. The difficulty arose with the refusal of the Catholic Church to constitute such associations, forcing the legislator to accompany this law of separation by a body of law, premise of future state accommodations in this area. The law of 1905 was not applied in its entirety since its promulgation and the body of law it engendered resulted in a multitude of compromises to two cults in particular: the Catholic Church and Islam. Today, these two religions are hardly subject to the provisions of the 1905 law, from a material, organizational or financial point of view. The absence of unity of the law of cults in France (even within the law of 1905, in Alsace-Moselle and in the DOM-TOM) is not likely to answer the questions raised by the religious metamorphosis that occurs France. It may have been time to make this juridical regime of cults evolve again, adapting it more to the current religious context
Denolle, Alice. "L'accès à la propriété des biens archéologiques. Etude de droit comparé, France, Etats-Unis." Thesis, Paris 11, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013PA111006.
Full textFrance and the United States have both recognized the importance of preserving archaeological resources against any damage or destruction through legal protection so that their use by present generations and their transfer to future generations may be ensured. This importance is reflected through the existence of a public interest in the preservation ofarchaeological resources. The public interest is rooted in different values which are assigned to archaeological resources and which may be referred to as the cognitive value, the identity value, the aesthetic value and the economic value. In both countries the cognitive value appears to be the cornerstone of protective legislation.Even though the United States and France recognize that there is a public interest in preserving archaeological resources, the ownership of archaeological resources is still deeply governed by common law rules, according to which archaeological resources are seen as mere property. This dichotomy proves to be a source of tension between two competing interests:the public interest which lies in archaeological resources protection on the one hand, and the private interest, expressed through ownership, on the other hand.The legal definition of protected archaeological resources lies therefore at the forefront of the issue. In both countries, there is no uniform status of archaeological resources. However, protective legislation recognizes the very specificity of these resources, developing therefore specific protective schemes. The two legal systems tend to favor public ownership, the state being seen has the most suitable owner capable of ensuring preservation. But private ownership appears to be a strong opposition public ownership has to face. However, private ownership of archaeological resources does not necessarily equal lack of protection.No special property status has thus been implemented in either countries. Conflicts arising between preservation and ownership of archaeological resources in the current protective systems could therefore be resolved by drawing the consequences of the specificity of archaeological resources into the protective schemes
Books on the topic "Cultural property – France"
Le patrimoine culturel immatériel: Premières expériences en France. Montréal: Leméac, 2011.
Find full textCongrès national des archivistes français (32nd 1991 Tours, France). Les archivistes dans la France de demain. Paris: Archives nationales, Direction des archives de France, 1993.
Find full textToulier, Bernard. Architecture et patrimoine du XXe siècle en France. Paris: Editions du patrimoine, 1999.
Find full textLa France solde son patrimoine. Paris: Jean-Claude Gawsewitch, 2012.
Find full textMartine, Plouvier, Brest Pierre-Yves, and Inventaire général des monuments et des richesses artistiques Languedoc-Roussillon (France), eds. Sur une frontière de la France, la Thiérache, Aisne. Amiens: Association pour la généralisation de l'inventaire régional en Picardie, 2001.
Find full textLes lieux de l'histoire de France. Paris]: Perrin, 2017.
Find full textMoncan, Patrice de. A qui appartient la France: Histoire de la propriété urbaine de 1789 à 2000 et état actuel de la propriété immobilière en ville. Paris: Mécène, 2000.
Find full textJulien, Delannoy, Blieck Gilles, Le Bas Antoine, and Inventaire général des monuments et des richesses artistiques de la France. Commission régionale d'inventaire d'Ile de France., eds. Conflans-Sainte-Honorine, terre de confluences: Ile-de-France. Paris: APPIF, 2005.
Find full textLa France s'écrit en capitales. Monaco: Rocher, 2011.
Find full textOuverts au public, le guide du patrimoine en France: 2500 monuments et sites. Paris: Patrimoine, 2010.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Cultural property – France"
Macknight, Elizabeth C. "Protecting property during revolution." In Nobility and patrimony in modern France. Manchester University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9781526120519.003.0002.
Full textLevine, Alison J. Murray. "Depth of Field." In France in Flux, 63–91. Liverpool University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781786941787.003.0004.
Full textMacknight, Elizabeth C. "Incapacity and debt." In Nobility and patrimony in modern France. Manchester University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9781526120519.003.0005.
Full textGeoffroy-Schwinden, Rebecca Dowd. "Introduction." In From Servant to Savant, 1–18. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197511510.003.0001.
Full text"L’État comme propriétaire? Schools as Property in Nineteenth-Century France." In Institutions and Power in Nineteenth-Century French Literature and Culture, 219–34. Brill | Rodopi, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789401200806_015.
Full textSchneider, Marius, and Vanessa Ferguson. "Rwanda." In Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Africa. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198837336.003.0043.
Full textHancı-Azizoglu, Eda Başak. "Scientific Publishing in English for Non-English-Speaking Academicians." In Advances in Educational Marketing, Administration, and Leadership, 278–94. IGI Global, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-7772-0.ch015.
Full textSchneider, Marius, and Vanessa Ferguson. "Senegal." In Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Africa. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198837336.003.0045.
Full textMurdoch, H. Adlai. "BUMIDOM." In Postcolonial Realms of Memory, 244–54. Liverpool University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.3828/liverpool/9781789620665.003.0023.
Full textHorta, Paulo Lemos. "Cosmopolitan Prejudice." In Cosmopolitanisms. NYU Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479829682.003.0013.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Cultural property – France"
Sosa García, Omar. "Fragmentos de identidad insular: paisaje y cultura local como herramientas para la planificación turística de Agaete y Alghero." In Seminario Internacional de Investigación en Urbanismo. Barcelona: Curso de Arquitetura e Urbanismo. Universidade do Vale do Itajaí, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.5821/siiu.6351.
Full textFranco Arce, Samuel. "Someone’s treasure: a legacy for all?" In SOIMA 2015: Unlocking Sound and Image Heritage. International Centre for the Study of the Preservation and Restoration of Cultural Property, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.18146/soima2015.1.03.
Full text