Academic literature on the topic 'Crop residue'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Crop residue.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Crop residue"
KUMAR, KULDIP, K. M. GOH, W. R. SCOTT, and C. M. FRAMPTON. "Effects of 15N-labelled crop residues and management practices on subsequent winter wheat yields, nitrogen benefits and recovery under field conditions." Journal of Agricultural Science 136, no. 1 (February 2001): 35–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021859600008522.
Full textRiddle, Rachel N., John O'Sullivan, Clarence J. Swanton, and Rene C. Van Acker. "Crop Response to Carryover of Mesotrione Residues in the Field." Weed Technology 27, no. 1 (March 2013): 92–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/wt-d-12-00071.1.
Full textJiang, Yongzhong, Valerii Havrysh, Oleksandr Klymchuk, Vitalii Nitsenko, Tomas Balezentis, and Dalia Streimikiene. "Utilization of Crop Residue for Power Generation: The Case of Ukraine." Sustainability 11, no. 24 (December 8, 2019): 7004. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11247004.
Full textBurgos, Nilda R., and Ronald E. Talbert. "Weed Control by Spring Cover Crops and Imazethapyr in No-till Southern Pea (Vigna unguiculata)." Weed Technology 10, no. 4 (December 1996): 893–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0890037x00040987.
Full textAmgain, Lal, Ajit Sharma, Jagadish Timsina, and Pradeep Wagle. "Water, Nutrient, and Energy-use Efficiencies of No-till Rainfed Cropping Systems with or without Residue Retention in a Semi-Arid Dryland Area." Global Journal of Agricultural and Allied Sciences 1, no. 1 (December 3, 2019): 30–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.35251/gjaas.2019.004.
Full textHiel, Marie-Pierre, Sophie Barbieux, Jérôme Pierreux, Claire Olivier, Guillaume Lobet, Christian Roisin, Sarah Garré, Gilles Colinet, Bernard Bodson, and Benjamin Dumont. "Impact of crop residue management on crop production and soil chemistry after seven years of crop rotation in temperate climate, loamy soils." PeerJ 6 (May 23, 2018): e4836. http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4836.
Full textOda, Masato. "Dispersion has a large effect (Cohen's d) on crop yield in crop residue application." F1000Research 7 (November 21, 2018): 1831. http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.16748.1.
Full textBlackshaw, R. E., and C. W. Lindwall. "Species, herbicide and tillage effects on surface crop residue cover during fallow." Canadian Journal of Soil Science 75, no. 4 (November 1, 1995): 559–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/cjss95-079.
Full textLupwayi, Newton Z., and Yoong K. Soon. "Soil microbial properties during decomposition of pulse crop and legume green manure residues in three consecutive subsequent crops." Canadian Journal of Soil Science 96, no. 4 (December 1, 2016): 413–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/cjss-2016-0039.
Full textBabu, Subhash, D. S. Rana, G. S. Yadav, Raghavendra Singh, and S. K. Yadav. "A Review on Recycling of Sunflower Residue for Sustaining Soil Health." International Journal of Agronomy 2014 (2014): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/601049.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Crop residue"
Collins, Shane. "Residue composition influences nutrient release from crop residues." University of Western Australia. School of Earth and Geographical Sciences, 2009. http://theses.library.uwa.edu.au/adt-WU2009.0171.
Full textMyers, Brian. "Variable crop residue management." Thesis, Kansas State University, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/35271.
Full textDepartment of Agricultural Economics
Jeffery R. Williams
Production agriculture is constantly evolving to become more efficient and productive. Crop residue serves as a valuable source of nutrients for the soil, but it is increasingly abundant with today’s enhanced crop genetics. If new technology can effectively provide a way to micro-manage crop residue levels within a field, the benefits will go beyond soil health. Surplus crop residue can be collected for secondary income while leaving the optimum amounts in the field to maintain the environment and soil health as well as promote future crop growth. The main objective of this study is to create a budget model that will determine the economic impact of crop residue removal on a controlled basis. The goals are to determine crop residue removal practices that are sustainable for the long-term, while also enhancing soil quality and increasing grain yield in future years. A sub-objective is to build a business case for producers to invest in variable crop residue management. The hypothesis presented in this study is that the increased complexity and price of a variable rate system is offset by more supplemental profits, increased crop yields, and better management of soil health and nutrients. The negative perceptions of crop residue removal include the fear of soil erosion or loss of soil organic matter. By developing a budget model that is easy to use, takes advantage of existing field data for inputs, and allows producers the ability to look at their operations on a sub-field level, this study aims to provide the necessary motivation to invest in new technology that will increase their productivity. By entering their site-specific crop residue return rate data into a budget model, along with prices and costs related to combine and auxiliary equipment, corn and corn stover, transportation and logistics, and nutrient replacement, they will come up with a return per acre for both constant rate and variable rate collection. The budget model determines whether it is economically viable to harvest crop residue from a continuous corn rotation at a variable rate across a field, rather than at a constant rate, using a producer’s own specific field data. To validate the concept, data from a joint study between John Deere and Iowa State is entered into the model. Prescriptions for corn stover return rates are provided from the study for pre-defined grid areas. Prescriptions are derived from a combination of data including grain yield, soil loss due to wind and water erosion, climate, topography, and soil sample data at time of planting (Nelson, et al. 2004). The average corn stover removal percentage was less for variable rate collection than constant rate collection, 26.05% to 31.85%. However, the assumption that grain yield and corn stover yield are positively correlated did not prove to be true in this case study. The variable rate plots had a lower average grain yield of 158.84 bushel/acre, compared to 160.46 for the constant rate plots, but they had more total corn stover available and therefore a higher return rate of 3.70 tons/acre, compared to 3.05 for the constant rate plots. This case study illustrates that less corn stover can be returned to the field through constant or variable rate collection while sustaining higher grain yields than a conventional harvest that would return all of the corn stover to the field. This case study demonstrates that variable rate collection can be more expensive than constant rate, but not in every situation. Every unique field site will require a specific crop residue management recommendation that is determined by both economic and environmental factors.
Ess, Daniel R. "Cover crop residue effects on machine-induced soil compaction." Diss., This resource online, 1994. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06062008-164819/.
Full textHe, Yuxin. "Crop residue management and its impacts on soil properties." Diss., Kansas State University, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/19043.
Full textAgronomy
DeAnn R. Presley
Crop residue removal for livestock feeding and biofuel production at large scales must be evaluated to assess impacts on soil productivity and properties. Among all the potential negative impacts, wind erosion is a major concern in the central Great Plains. We conducted an on-farm study from 2011 to 2013 by removing crop residue at five levels (0, 25, 50, 75, and 100%) to determine the effects of crop residue removal on soil wind erosion parameters such as dry aggregate size distribution including soil wind erodible fraction (EF <0.84 mm aggregates), geometric mean diameter (GMD) and geometric standard deviation (GSD), dry aggregate stability, and soil surface roughness. The sub-model of Wind Erosion Prediction System (WEPS) developed by the USDA-ARS, Single-event Wind Erosion Evaluation Program (SWEEP) is a stand-alone companion software package that can be applied to simulate soil loss and dust emission from a single windstorm event. We applied measured data (i.e. EF, GMD, GSD, and roughness) to SWEEP for predicting wind velocity that can initiate wind erosion and soil loss under each crop residue removal condition with wind velocity at 13 m sˉ¹. The threshold wind velocity to initiate wind erosion generally decreased with increase in crop residue removal levels, particularly for residue removal >75%. The total amount of soil loss in 3 hours ranged from about 0.2 to 2.5 kg mˉ² and depends on soil condition and crop residue cover. On the other hand, high-yielding crops can produce abundant crop residue, which then raises the question that if a farmer wants to reduce residue, what could they do without removing it? The application of fertilizer on crop residue to stimulate microbial activity and subsequent decomposition of the residue is often debated. We conducted wheat straw decomposition field experiments under different fertilizer rates and combinations at three locations in western Kansas following wheat harvest in 2011 and 2012. A double shear box apparatus instrumented with a load cell measured the shear stress required to cut wheat straw and photomicrography was used to measure the cross-sectional area of wheat straw after shearing. Total C and N were also analyzed. The fertilizer rate and timing of application during summer 2012 and Fall 2013 at the Hays site had impacts on wheat straw shear stress at break point. Across site years, earlier (fall) fertilizer application generally resulted in lower remaining aboveground biomass as compared to a spring application. Multivariate and linear regressions suggested that N and C:N ratio partially explain the results observed with respect to treatment effects on winter wheat residue decomposition.
Subedi-Chalise, Kopila. "Impacts of Crop Residue and Cover Crops on Soil Hydrological Properties, Soil Water Storage and Water Use Efficiency of Soybean Crop." Thesis, South Dakota State University, 2017. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10265200.
Full textCover crops and crop residue play a multifunctional role in improving soil hydrological properties, soil water storage and water use efficiency (WUE). This study was conducted to better understand the role of crop residue and cover crop on soil properties and soil water dynamics. The study was conducted at the USDA-ARS North Central Agricultural Research Laboratory, located in Brookings, South Dakota. Two residue removal treatments that include low residue removal (LRR) and high residue removal (HRR) were established in 2000 with randomized complete block design under no-till corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation. In 2005, cover crop treatments which include cover crops (CC) and no cover crops (NCC) were integrated into the overall design. Soil samples were collected in 2014, 2015 and 2016. Data from this study showed that LRR treatment resulted in lower bulk density (BD) by 7 and 9% compared to HRR in 2015 and 2016, respectively, for 0-5 cm depth. Similarly, LRR treatment significantly reduced soil penetration resistance (SPR) by 25% in 0-5 cm depth compared with HRR treatment. In addition to this, LRR treatment significantly increased soil organic carbon (SOC) concentrations and total nitrogen (TN) by 22 and 17%, respectively, in 0-5 cm. Similarly, CC treatment resulted in lower BD and SPR by 7% and 23%, respectively, in 0-5 cm depth in 2015 compared with NCC treatment. The LRR significantly increased soil water infiltration by 66 and 22% compared to HRR in 2014 and 2015, respectively. Similarly, the CC treatment significantly increased infiltration by 82 and 22% compared to the NCC in 2014 and 2015, respectively. The significant impact of a crop residue was observed on soil water retention (SWR) in 2014 and 2015 for the 0-5 cm depth. The LRR and CC treatments increased the soil volumetric moisture content (VMC) and soil water storage (SWS) on the surface 0-5 cm depth. However, the trend was not always significant during the growing season. The CC treatment significantly impacted the soybean yield by 14% and WUE by 13% compared with NCC treatment. Some interaction of residue by cover crops was observed on BD, SPR, VMC, and SWS, which showed that the use of cover crops with LRR can be beneficial in improving the soil properties.
Isaac, Gura. "Crop rotation and crop residue management effects under no till on the soil quality of two ecotopes in the Eastern Cape, South Africa." Thesis, University of Fort Hare, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10353/2934.
Full textBattaglia, Martin. "Crop residue management effects on crop production, greenhouse gases emissions, and soil quality in the Mid-Atlantic USA." Diss., Virginia Tech, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/86483.
Full textPh. D.
Burgess, Magdalena S. E. "Crop residue decomposition and nitrogen dynamics in corn under three tillage systems." Thesis, McGill University, 2000. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=36879.
Full textAlghamdi, Rashad Saeed. "Nitrogen Mineralization Dynamics of Post Harvest Crop Residue in No-Till Systems." Diss., North Dakota State University, 2020. https://hdl.handle.net/10365/31945.
Full textAdu-Tutu, K. O., W. B. McCloskey, S. H. Husman, P. A. Clay, M. J. Ottman, E. C. Martin, and T. Teegerstrom. "Reduced Tillage and Crop Residue Effects on Cotton Weed Control, Growth and Yield." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/198156.
Full textBooks on the topic "Crop residue"
US DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. USDA crop residue management action plan. [United States]: USDA, 1992.
Find full textBull, Leonard. Crop residue management and tillage system trends. Washington, DC: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, ERS, 1996.
Find full textGreat, Plains Residue Management Conference (1994 Amarillo Tex ). A future using residue management: Proceedings : Great Plains Residue Management Conference, August 15-17, 1994, Amarillo, Texas. [United States]: The Council, 1994.
Find full textBull, Leonard. Residue and tillage systems for field crops. [Washington, DC]: U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Resources and Technology Division, 1993.
Find full textGalinato, Gerry. Assessment of agricultural crop residue for energy recovery in Idaho. Boise, Idaho: Idaho Dept. of Water Resources, Bureau of Energy Resources, 1987.
Find full textChuang, Hsin. Determining crop residue type and class using satellite acquired data: A thesis. [West Lafayette, Ind.]: Purdue University, 1990.
Find full textDrewes, Norbert. Umsatz verschiedener Ernterückstände in einem Bodensäulenversuchssystem: Einfluss auf die organische Bodensubstanz und den Transport zweier Xenobiotika. [Jülich]: Forschungszentrum Jülich, 2005.
Find full textLamarca, Carlos Crovetto. Stubble over the soil: The vital role of plant residue in soil management to improve soil quality. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, 1996.
Find full textErenstein, Olaf C. A. The economics of soil conservation in developing countries: The case of crop residue mulching. Wageningen: Wageningen Universiteit, 1999.
Find full textHermanson, Ronald E. No-tillage drill design. [Pullman, Wash: Cooperative Extension, College of Agriculture & Home Economics, Washington State University, 1985.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Crop residue"
Gabrys, Beata, John L. Capinera, Jesusa C. Legaspi, Benjamin C. Legaspi, Lewis S. Long, John L. Capinera, Jamie Ellis, et al. "Crop Residue." In Encyclopedia of Entomology, 1111. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6359-6_10094.
Full textReddy, P. Parvatha. "Crop Residue Management." In Sustainable Intensification of Crop Production, 83–92. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2702-4_6.
Full textPrasad, Rajendra, and J. F. Power. "Crop Residue Management." In Advances in Soil Science, 205–51. New York, NY: Springer New York, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3030-4_5.
Full textReddy, P. Parvatha. "Crop Residue Management and Organic Amendments." In Agro-ecological Approaches to Pest Management for Sustainable Agriculture, 29–41. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4325-3_3.
Full textMathur, Ritu, and V. K. Srivastava. "Crop Residue Burning: Effects on Environment." In Energy, Environment, and Sustainability, 127–40. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3272-2_9.
Full textSteiner, Jean L. "Climatic Impacts on Crop Residue Decomposition." In A Spectrum of Achievements in Agronomy, 57–64. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/asaspecpub62.c7.
Full textKumar, Parmod, Surender Kumar, and Laxmi Joshi. "Alternative Uses of Crop Stubble." In Socioeconomic and Environmental Implications of Agricultural Residue Burning, 69–89. New Delhi: Springer India, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2014-5_4.
Full textTriplett, G. B., and J. V. Mannering. "Crop Residue Management in Crop Rotation and Multiple Cropping Systems." In ASA Special Publications, 187–206. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/asaspecpub31.c11.
Full textMolina, J. A. E., M. J. Shaffer, R. H. Dowdy, and J. F. Power. "Simulation of Tillage Residue and Nitrogen Management." In Soil Erosion and Crop Productivity, 413–30. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, Soil Science Society of America, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/1985.soilerosionandcrop.c22.
Full textBlanco-Canqui, Humberto, and Rattan Lal. "Crop Residue Management and Soil Carbon Dynamics." In SSSA Special Publications, 291–309. Madison, WI, USA: American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaspecpub57.2ed.c17.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Crop residue"
McMurtrey III, James E., Moon S. Kim, Craig S. T. Daughtry, Lawrence A. Corp, and Emmett W. Chappelle. "Fluorescence of crop residue: postmortem analysis of crop conditions." In AeroSense '97, edited by Ram M. Narayanan and James E. Kalshoven, Jr. SPIE, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.277601.
Full textCai, Wenting, Shuhe Zhao, Zhaohua Zhang, Fanchen Peng, and Jinjie Xu. "Comparison of Different Crop Residue Indices for Estimating Crop Residue Cover Using Field Observation Data." In 2018 7th International Conference on Agro-geoinformatics (Agro-geoinformatics). IEEE, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/agro-geoinformatics.2018.8476112.
Full textKaspar, Tom. "Residue and Compaction Management." In Proceedings of the 1992 Crop Production and Protection Conference. Iowa State University, Digital Press, 1993. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/icm-180809-444.
Full textSadeghi, Hossein, and Mohammad Jafar Bahrani. "New Approach to Prevent Burning Crop Residue by Creating Residue Mulch." In 2009 Second International Conference on Environmental and Computer Science. IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icecs.2009.8.
Full textMonty, J. G., M. Crawford, and C. S. T. Daughtry. "Assessing Crop Residue Cover Using Hyperion Data." In IGARSS 2008 - 2008 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IEEE, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/igarss.2008.4778988.
Full textHanna, Mark. "Tillage Equipment Adjustment for Surface Residue." In Proceedings of the 1992 Crop Production and Protection Conference. Iowa State University, Digital Press, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/icm-180809-405.
Full textJuan Yang. "Crop residue based bioelectricity production prospect in China." In Environment (ICMREE). IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icmree.2011.5930811.
Full textJohnson, Richard. "Residue Management with Chisel-Type Implements." In Proceedings of the First Annual Crop Production and Protection Conference. Iowa State University, Digital Press, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/icm-180809-383.
Full textHanna, Mark, Don Erbach, Tom Kaspar, Muhammed Iqbal, and Stephen Marley. "Corn Planter Attachment Effects on Soil and Residue." In Proceedings of the 1995 Integrated Crop Management Conference. Iowa State University, Digital Press, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/icm-180809-542.
Full textHanna, H. Mark, Dwaine S. Bundy, Jeffery C. Lorimor, Steven K. Mickelson, and Stewart W. Melvin. "Manue Application Effects on Residue, Odor, and Placement." In Proceedings of the 1995 Integrated Crop Management Conference. Iowa State University, Digital Press, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/icm-180809-569.
Full textReports on the topic "Crop residue"
Bannari, A., D. Haboudane, H. McNairn, and F. Bonn. Modified Soil Adjusted Crop Residue Index (MSACRI): A new index for mapping crop residue. Natural Resources Canada/ESS/Scientific and Technical Publishing Services, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.4095/219698.
Full textAuthor, Not Given. Multicomponent Harvesting Equipment for Inexpensive Sugars from Crop Residue. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), October 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/942154.
Full textMcNairn, H., D. Wood, Q. H. J. Gwyn, R. J. Brown, and F. Charbonneau. Mapping Tillage and Crop Residue Management Practices with RADARSAT. Natural Resources Canada/ESS/Scientific and Technical Publishing Services, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.4095/219178.
Full textMcNairn, H., J. B. Boisvert, C. Duguay, E. Huffman, and R J Brown. Investigating the Relationship Between Crop Residue Cover and Radar Backscatter. Natural Resources Canada/ESS/Scientific and Technical Publishing Services, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.4095/218972.
Full textMcNairn, H., C. Duguay, B. Brisco, and T. J. Pultz. The effect of soil and crop residue characteristics on polarimetric radar response. Natural Resources Canada/ESS/Scientific and Technical Publishing Services, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.4095/219791.
Full textClark, Justin, James R. Russell, Douglas Karlen, Darrell Busby, L. James Secor, Brian Peterson, Larry Pellack, Carroll Olsen, and Shawn C. Shouse. Effects of Corn Crop Residue Grazing on Soil Physical Properties and Subsequent Soybean Production in a Corn-Soybean Crop Rotation (A Progress Report). Ames: Iowa State University, Digital Repository, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/farmprogressreports-180814-2800.
Full textClark, Justin, James R. Russell, Douglas Karlen, Darrell Busby, L. James Secor, Brian Peterson, Larry Pellack, Carroll Olsen, and Shawn C. Shouse. Effects of Corn Crop Residue Grazing on Soil Physical Properties and Subsequent Soybean Production in a Corn-Soybean Crop Rotation (A Progress Report). Ames: Iowa State University, Digital Repository, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.31274/farmprogressreports-180814-2594.
Full textIan Bonner and David Muth. Determine metrics and set targets for soil quality on agriculture residue and energy crop pathways. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), September 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1129107.
Full textMcNairn, H., C. Duguay, J. B. Boisvert, E. Huffman, and B. Brisco. Defining the Sensitivity of Multi-frequency and Multi-polarized Radar Backscatter to Post-Harvest Crop Residue. Natural Resources Canada/ESS/Scientific and Technical Publishing Services, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.4095/219672.
Full textTurhollow Jr, Anthony F., Erin Webb, and Shahabaddine Sokhansanj. Cost Methodology for Biomass Feedstocks: Herbaceous Crops and Agricultural Residues. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), December 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/969956.
Full text