Academic literature on the topic 'Criticism and interpretationshelley, mary wollstonecraft , 1797-1851'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Contents
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Criticism and interpretationshelley, mary wollstonecraft , 1797-1851.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Criticism and interpretationshelley, mary wollstonecraft , 1797-1851"
Kibaris, Anna-Maria. "Mary Shelley's monstrous patchwork : textual "grafting" and the novel." Thesis, McGill University, 1995. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=23337.
Full textRae, Angela Lynn. "The haunted bedroom: female sexual identity in Gothic literature, 1790-1820." Thesis, Rhodes University, 1999. http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1002294.
Full textAngel-Cann, Lauryn. "Stretched Out On Her Grave: The Evolution of a Perversion." Thesis, University of North Texas, 2000. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc2586/.
Full textDonada, Jaqueline Bohn. ""Spontaneous overflow of powerful feelings" : romantic imagery in Mary Shelley's Frankenstein." reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/10183/7109.
Full textRomantic English literature – written at a time when prose fiction was predominantly a medium for sheer entertainment – is rooted in poetry. One or two novelists may exceptionally be granted the adjective “Romantic”, but Mary Shelley is not ranked among them. For centuries, her work has been restricted to that section in handbooks reserved for exotic Gothic literature. This thesis argues that literary criticism has failed to recognize Frankenstein’s obvious relation with the movement. The argument will be fostered by a brief look at such handbooks, and developed through the analysis of the imagery of the novel, so as to trace the Romantic elements there contained. The analysis relies mainly on the frame developed by Northrop Frye concerning the nature and function of imagery in literature. The concept of intertextuality will also be useful as a tool to account for the insertion of images in the novel, and for the novel’s insertion within the Romantic context. The work is divided into three parts. The first contextualizes the main issues set forth by Frankenstein, establishing connections with the life of the author and with the Romantic movement. The second exposes the theoretical basis on which the thesis is grounded. The last presents my reading of the novel’s web of images. In the end, I hope to validate the thesis proposed, that Frankenstein embodies the aesthetic and philosophical assessments of the English Romantic agenda, and therefore deserves to be situated in its due place in the English Literary canon as the legitimate representative of Romanticism in prose form.
Poston, Craig A. (Craig Alan). "The Problematic British Romantic Hero(ine): the Giaour, Mathilda, and Evelina." Thesis, University of North Texas, 1995. https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc278684/.
Full textPrevide, Mauri Cruz [UNESP]. "À sua imagem e semelhança: um estudo de criadores e criaturas em A Eva futura de Villiers de l'Isle Adam e em Frankenstein de Mary Shelley no contexto do romance europeu do século XIX." Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/154657.
Full textEsta tese tem por objetivo o estudo de duas obras literárias que têm como personagens cientistas criadores e suas criaturas artificiais. Trata-se das obras de Villiers de l'Isle-Adam (1838-1889) e de Mary Shelley (1797-1851), representadas pelos romances L'Ève future e Frankenstein, respectivamente. Para tanto, e em primeiro lugar, traçamos um histórico do desejo humano de criar uma criatura artificial perfeita desde a Antiguidade até os dias atuais. Em seguida, passamos à análise das referidas obras, caracterizando e comparando os criadores e suas respectivas criaturas, concluindo, ao final, o que ambas representam em termos metafóricos
This dissertation aims to study two literary works whose characters are creators scientists and their artificial creatures. The following novels are studied: L'Ève future by Villiers de l'Isle-Adam (1838-1889) and Frankenstein by Mary Shelley (1797-1851). Firstly, it was made a survey of the human desire to create a perfect artificial creature from Antiquity to nowadays. Secondly, we started to analyze such literary works, characterizing and comparing the creators and their creatures, and finally, getting the conclusion what both represent metaphorically
Delaney, EA. "Of marriageable age : rethinking approaches to father-daughter incest narratives in the long eighteenth century." Thesis, 2005. https://eprints.utas.edu.au/19845/1/whole_DelaneyElizabethAnn2007_thesis.pdf.
Full textBell, Vivienne Ann. "William Godwin and Frankenstein : the secularization of Calvinism in Godwin's philosophy and the sub-Godwinian Gothic novel; with some remarks on the relationship of the Gothic to Romanticism." Thesis, 1993. http://hdl.handle.net/2440/110456.
Full textBooks on the topic "Criticism and interpretationshelley, mary wollstonecraft , 1797-1851"
Harold, Bloom, ed. Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley. New York: Bloom's Literary Criticism, 2008.
Find full textMary Shelley. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
Find full textHarold, Bloom, ed. Mary Shelley. New York: Bloom's Literary Criticism, 2008.
Find full textMary Wollstonecraft Shelley: An introduction. Baltimore, Md: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.
Find full textMary Shelley. Mercer Island, WA: Starmont House, 1988.
Find full textPhy, Allene Stuart. Mary Shelley. San Bernardino, Calif: Borgo Press, 1988.
Find full textH, Schor Esther, ed. The Cambridge companion to Mary Shelley. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
Find full textWomen in romanticism: Mary Wollstonecraft, Dorothy Wordsworth and Mary Shelley. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education, 1989.
Find full textWomen in romanticism: Mary Wollstonecraft, Dorothy Wordsworth, and Mary Shelley. Savage, Md: Barnes & Noble Books, 1989.
Find full textMary Shelley: A literary life. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2000.
Find full text