Academic literature on the topic 'Credibility judgment'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Credibility judgment.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Credibility judgment"

1

Mutter, Sharon A., Sue E. Lindsey, and Rebecca M. Pliske. "Aging and credibility judgment." Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition 2, no. 2 (April 1995): 89–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13825589508256590.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Ask, Karl, Sofia Calderon, Erik Mac Giolla, and Marc-André Reinhard. "Approach, Avoidance, and the Perception of Credibility." Open Psychology 2, no. 1 (January 7, 2020): 3–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/psych-2020-0002.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractBased on a functional approach to credibility judgments, the authors hypothesize that receivers’ judgments of senders’ credibility involve an evaluative dimension (i.e., good–bad) and are associated with approach and avoidance tendencies. In three experiments (total N = 645), participants (receivers) judged the credibility of suspects (senders) denying involvement in a mock theft. While watching or reading the message, receivers performed an approach-related (arm flexion) or an avoidance-related (arm extension) motor action. Although receivers’ affective evaluations of senders (good–bad) correlated strongly with credibility judgments in all three experiments, the results of the arm position manipulation were mixed. In Experiment 1, receivers in an arm flexion (vs. arm extension) state judged the sender as more credible, but only when informed beforehand about the upcoming credibility judgment. In Experiment 2 and 3, however, there was no evidence of an arm position effect on credibility judgments. A cross-experimental meta-analysis revealed that the effect of the manipulation was statistically indistinguishable from zero, Hedges’ g = 0.07, 95% CI [−0.09, 0.22], and provided strong support for the null hypothesis. Multiple interpretations of the results are discussed.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Jahn, Johannes, Melanie Eichhorn, and Rolf Brühl. "How Do Individuals Judge Organizational Legitimacy? Effects of Attributed Motives and Credibility on Organizational Legitimacy." Business & Society 59, no. 3 (July 6, 2017): 545–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0007650317717959.

Full text
Abstract:
This experimental study examines individuals’ legitimacy judgments. We develop a model that demonstrates the role of attributed motives and corporate credibility for the evaluation of organizational legitimacy and test this model with an experimental vignette study. Our results show that when a corporate activity creates benefits for the firm—in addition to social benefits—individuals attribute more extrinsic motives. Extrinsic motives are ascribed when a corporation is perceived as being driven by external rewards as opposed to an altruistic commitment to a social cause. Extrinsic motives negatively affect corporate credibility and organizational legitimacy judgments. This article contributes to a better understanding of the complex process of organizational legitimacy judgment by shedding light on the individual’s perspective and expounding the relationship between attributed motives, corporate credibility, and organizational legitimacy.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

马, 东云. "Characteristics of Chinese College Students’ Emotional Voice Credibility Judgment." Advances in Psychology 08, no. 10 (2018): 1527–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.12677/ap.2018.810177.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Nahari, Galit. "Elaborations on credibility judgments by professional lie detectors and laypersons: strategies of judgment and justification." Psychology, Crime & Law 18, no. 6 (July 2012): 567–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1068316x.2010.511222.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Beaulieu, Philip R. "The Effects of Judgments of New Clients' Integrity upon Risk Judgments, Audit Evidence, and Fees." AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory 20, no. 2 (September 1, 2001): 85–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/aud.2001.20.2.85.

Full text
Abstract:
Client integrity concerns auditors when they plan new audit engagements because it is related to both fraud risk and the source credibility of clients. Auditors may increase audit work and fees when they judge integrity to be below normal. In an experiment, a sample of 63 Canadian audit partners read information about a prospective audit client, including information about the client's CFO. This information was manipulated to support a judgment of either high or low integrity. As hypothesized, judgments of client integrity were negatively related to risk judgments, audit evidence extent recommendations (indirectly through risk judgments), and fee recommendations (indirectly through risk judgments and extent recommendations).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Faust, David. "Declarations versus Investigations: The Case for the Special Reasoning Abilities and Capabilities of the Expert witness in Psychology/Psychiatry." Journal of Psychiatry & Law 13, no. 1-2 (March 1985): 33–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093185385013001-204.

Full text
Abstract:
Arguments regarding the credibility of psychologists’ and psychiatrists’ expert testimony are commonly restricted to impressions about whether claims to special reasoning powers or capabilities are justified or not. The large, but often neglected body of research on human judgment provides a means for analyzing these claims scientifically. Systematic review shows that claims for the beneficial effects of experience and practice on judgment accuracy, the clinician's powers of data integration, the ability to utilize clinical impression, and the capacity to detect malingering have little evidence and extensive counterevidence. Caution is advised in using these claims to bolster one's credibility.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

McGrath, Kristin, and Cecilie Gaziano. "Dimensions of Media Credibility: Highlights of the 1985 ASNE Survey." Newspaper Research Journal 7, no. 2 (January 1986): 55–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/073953298600700207.

Full text
Abstract:
The 1985 ASNE media credibility survey showed the public is most critical of media in their coverage of ordinary people, accuracy and bias. Other credibility problems derive from people's confusion about separation of fact and opinion, differences between the public and the media in news judgment, coverage of news and news presentation. Attitudes toward credibility were related to views on press freedoms and attitudes toward media use. Recommendations for newspapers are provided.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Gaziano, Cecilie. "News People's Ideology and the Credibility Debate." Newspaper Research Journal 9, no. 1 (September 1987): 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/073953298700900101.

Full text
Abstract:
Data show newspaper journalists' tendency toward liberal philosophies is reflected in attitudes toward credibility, the way journalists and newspapers approach doing their jobs, coverage of different kinds of people, news judgment issues, press freedoms and evaluations of their newspapers. This tendency may contribute indirectly to public distrust of newspapers and other media because the public tends to be more conservative than journalists on these issues. Journalists' attitudes seem related to a “world view” which sets journalists, and one subgroup in particular, apart from the public as a whole.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

He, Jinhui, Huirong Zhang, Zhenyu Zhang, and Jiaping Zhang. "Probabilistic Linguistic Three-Way Multi-Attibute Decision Making for Hidden Property Evaluation of Judgment Debtor." Journal of Mathematics 2021 (May 3, 2021): 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9941200.

Full text
Abstract:
Most law enforcement cases executed by the courts in China have behaviours of evading, evading, or even violently resisting execution or passively waiting for enforcement, which seriously affects the authority of legal judgments and the judiciary’s credibility. Therefore, we develop a hidden property evaluation model based on the probabilistic linguistic three-way multiattribute decision-making (PL3W-MADM) method. Considering the advantages of probabilistic linguistic term sets (PLTSs) expressing the evaluation information and their probabilities on judgment debtor given by expert judges, we extend the three-way decision method to a probabilistic linguistic environment and develop the strict PL3W-MADM model and flexible PL3W-MADM model. Then, the PL3W-MADM models are used to construct the hidden property evaluation model of judgment debtors. Finally, the developed hidden property evaluation model can quickly and effectively classify the judgment debtors into three categories: hidden behaviour, no hidden behaviour or lack of information, and temporary inability to judge. The results show that the developed model is more suitable for hidden property evaluation than the strict PL3W-MADM model and the flexible PL3W-MADM model.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Credibility judgment"

1

Meyer, Raquel Ann. "The effect of source credibility on tax professional judgment in consulting engagements." Access restricted to users with UT Austin EID Full text (PDF) from UMI/Dissertation Abstracts International, 2001. http://wwwlib.umi.com/cr/utexas/fullcit?p3034987.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Ochoa, Claudia. "The effect of facial resemblance on alibi credibility and final verdicts." To access this resource online via ProQuest Dissertations and Theses @ UTEP, 2009. http://0-proquest.umi.com.lib.utep.edu/login?COPT=REJTPTU0YmImSU5UPTAmVkVSPTI=&clientId=2515.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Jenkins, James G. Jr. "The Influence of a Client Preference on Auditor Judgment: An Investigation of Temporal Effects and Client Trustworthiness." Diss., Virginia Tech, 1998. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/30465.

Full text
Abstract:
The purpose of this dissertation is to investigate auditors' judgments and decisions in the presence of an explicitly stated client preference. This investigation considers two factors. First, the temporal placement (i.e., timing) of the client preference is varied to allow for an examination of differential effects associated with the receipt of an early client preference and a late client preference. Second, client trustworthiness is varied so that participants may have a basis upon which to evaluate the client's representations (i.e., preferences). Practicing auditors, who were either managers or senior managers at a national accounting firm, participated in the study by completing two audit tasks in which the two factors were manipulated. Findings indicate that explicitly stated client preferences resulted in significantly different decision processes, but did not significantly influence auditors' judgment processes. However, further analysis indicated that there was no significant client preference (CP) effect observed for auditors' final decisions. Therefore, it appears that the influence of the client's preference was transitory. Taken together, these findings suggest that the CP did not result in a loss of auditors' objectivity. Auditors' judgments and decisions were sensitive to the client's relative trustworthiness. This finding suggests that auditors are responsive to a client's credibility when evaluating the client's representations. This result is expected given since generally accepted auditing standards require auditors to consider a source's credibility. However, it is surprising that auditors' evidence evaluation efforts were not differentially sensitive to the client's trustworthiness. Such a finding may indicate that the participating auditors' evidence evaluation efforts are more influenced by firm policy than individual judgment.
Ph. D.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Chung, Sungeun. "The cognitive dynamics of beliefs the role of discrepancy, credibility, and involvement on microprocesses of judgment /." College Park, Md. : University of Maryland, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/1903/2095.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (Ph. D.) -- University of Maryland, College Park, 2004.
Thesis research directed by: Communication. Title from t.p. of PDF. Includes bibliographical references. Published by UMI Dissertation Services, Ann Arbor, Mich. Also available in paper.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Fleming, Damon M. "The Effects of Management's Forecast Strategy on Venture Capitalist Investment Screening Judgment." Diss., Virginia Tech, 2006. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/29059.

Full text
Abstract:
Prior research indicates that management forecast strategies affect investors' perceptions of management, which, in turn, influence investors' judgments about the firm. The current study hypothesizes and demonstrates that decisions about the completeness and form of management's forecast disclosure affect venture capitalists' (VCs) investment screening judgments. In an experiment, 53 experienced VCs indicate whether they would recommend conducting due diligence on a new venture. I manipulate the completeness (inclusion vs. omission of quantitative data about the components of earnings) and form (point vs. range forecast values) of management's financial forecasts in a 2 X 2 between-subjects design. When management is more (less) complete in its forecast disclosure, participants make more (less) favorable investment screening judgments. Additionally, when managers provide less complete disclosures, the use of point rather than range forecasts leads to particularly unfavorable screening judgments, whereas when managers provide more complete disclosures, the use of point rather than range forecasts leads to particularly favorable screening judgments. Taken together, these results indicate that the completeness of forecast disclosure increases the favorability of screening judgments and decisions about the form of financial forecasts can offset some of the adverse consequences of less complete disclosure.
Ph. D.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

East, Rebekah Psychology Faculty of Science UNSW. "Happy and gullible, sad and wise? Mood effects on factual and interpersonal skepticism." Awarded by:University of New South Wales. Psychology, 2006. http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/24371.

Full text
Abstract:
The primary aim of this research was to examine the influence of temporary mood states on factual and interpersonal skepticism. Based on recent affect-cognition theorising and research on credibility judgment, 7 studies predicted that negative moods increase and positive moods decrease skepticism, because of the information-processing consequences of these affective states. First, three studies examined the influence of mood on factual skepticism toward urban myths and legends (Study 1) and novel and familiar general knowledge claims (Studies 2-3). Contrary to predictions, Study 1 found that sad participants were less skeptical than happy participants towards urban legends, possibly due to the negative valence of the claims. Because the feeling of familiarity has been shown to be an important determinant of truth, Studies 2-3 examined the influence of mood and familiarity on skepticism. Consistent with information processing theories of mood, happy participants were more likely than sad participants to give credence to familiar general knowledge claims (Study 2), even when given explicit feedback about their actual truth or falsity during initial exposure to claims (Study 3). The remainder of this thesis extended these findings to interpersonal judgments. Studies 4-5 found that sad participants were more skeptical of the genuineness of facial expressions of emotion compared to happy participants. Studies 6-7 examined whether sad participants might also show greater lie detection accuracy. In Study 6, happy, sad and neutral-mood participants judged the credibility of targets honestly or deceptively describing their emotional reaction to an affectively-laden film, but no evidence was found of mood induced differences in deception detection accuracy. However, in Study 7, sad participants were more skeptical than happy participants about the veracity of videotaped individuals honestly or deceptively denying their involvement in a mock crime (a theft), and showed greater accuracy at discerning lies from truths. This dissertation contributes to the affect-cognition literature by demonstrating that not only may sad moods lead people to be more skeptical, but they may also confer an advantage at detecting deception. The implications of these findings for everyday credibility judgment and for contemporary theories of affect and cognition are considered.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Jadick, Christopher. "To Tell the Truth: The Credibility of Cable News Networks In an Era of Increasingly Partisan Political News Coverage." Scholar Commons, 2017. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/6867.

Full text
Abstract:
The credibility of the American news media is increasingly under fire. Despite an exponential expansion of information available in the digital media era, increased political news coverage and commentary has brought growing apprehension over how much of today’s news can be trusted and believed. 24-hour cable news channels are among the media most often subject to this criticism. At the same time, the media operates under First Amendment freedom of press protection, a constitutional guarantee granted with the understanding that democracy can only succeed when its citizens are well informed. In the great experiment of our republic, a freely functioning news media fills this critical role, but only to the extent that it can be trusted to portray the truth. This research questioned the media’s ability to inform the public due to the proliferation of political news and commentary. Utilizing social judgment theory, this study offered two hypotheses: that news consumers will find more credibility in political news when presented by media outlets they favor due to political preferences, and that they will also find more credibility in non-political news when presented by media they favor due to political preferences. The study examined if there is a bleed over effect on the credibility of non-political news due to political news coverage. An experiment was conducted in which two politically diverse populations, Republicans and Democrats, where asked to rate the credibility of six stories. Three of the stories were political, three non-political. While the content of those stories remained constant for all study participants, the media brands associated with the stories alternated between Fox News and CNN to determine if the media source alone influences perceptions of credibility. Results from members of both political parties provided support for each hypothesis. Republicans assigned greater credibility to both political and non-political news stories when presented by their network of preference, Fox News. By comparison, Democrats demonstrated greater trust when those same stories where branded by their preferred network, CNN.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

MacMartin, Clare. "Discursive constructions of child sexual abuse, conduct, credibility and culpability in trial judgments." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 2000. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp03/NQ47398.pdf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Meinert, Judith [Verfasser], and Nicole [Akademischer Betreuer] Krämer. "All you need is a (heuristic) cue? : An Empirical Investigation of the Use of Social Media Cues and Features and Underlying Mechanisms for Credibility Judgments of News and Political Communication / Judith Meinert ; Betreuer: Nicole Krämer." Duisburg, 2020. http://d-nb.info/1219467804/34.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Aumer-Ryan, Paul R. "Information triage : dual-process theory in credibility judgments of web-based resources." Thesis, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/2152/ETD-UT-2010-05-868.

Full text
Abstract:
This dissertation describes the credibility judgment process using social psychological theories of dual-processing, which state that information processing outcomes are the result of an interaction “between a fast, associative information- processing mode based on low-effort heuristics, and a slow, rule-based information processing mode based on high-effort systematic reasoning” (Chaiken & Trope, 1999, p. ix). Further, this interaction is illustrated by describing credibility judgments as a choice between examining easily identified peripheral cues (the messenger) and content (the message), leading to different evaluations in different settings. The focus here is on the domain of the Web, where ambiguous authorship, peer- produced content, and the lack of gatekeepers create an environment where credibility judgments are a necessary routine in triaging information. It reviews the relevant literature on existing credibility frameworks and the component factors that affect credibility judgments. The online encyclopedia (instantiated as Wikipedia and Encyclopedia Britannica) is then proposed as a canonical form to examine the credibility judgment process. The two main claims advanced here are (1) that information sources are composed of both message (the content) and messenger (the way the message is delivered), and that the messenger impacts perceived credibility; and (2) that perceived credibility is tempered by information need (individual engagement). These claims were framed by the models proposed by Wathen & Burkell (2002) and Chaiken (1980) to forward a composite dual process theory of credibility judgments, which was tested by two experimental studies. The independent variables of interest were: media format (print or electronic); reputation of source (Wikipedia or Britannica); and the participant’s individual involvement in the research task (high or low). The results of these studies encourage a more nuanced understanding of the credibility judgment process by framing it as a dual-process model, and showing that certain mediating variables can affect the relative use of low-effort evaluation and high- effort reasoning when forming a perception of credibility. Finally, the results support the importance of messenger effects on perceived credibility, implying that credibility judgments, especially in the online environment, and especially in cases of low individual engagement, are based on peripheral cues rather than an informed evaluation of content.
text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Credibility judgment"

1

Pettit, Philip. Discovering Desirability. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190904913.003.0007.

Full text
Abstract:
In the ordinary world, we identify the desirable as something that is grounded in other properties, may diverge from what we desire, and, other things being equal, has a claim to govern what we desire. While desirability comes in many modes, moral desirability is grounded in relatively unrestricted considerations and enjoys a certain authority in resolving conflicts. Being creatures who avow and co-avow our desires, we are likely to find those desires diverging occasionally from our actual desires, and commanding our allegiance in the case of a conflict. Thus, we will begin to think of that which attracts avowal, being supported robustly by relevant desiderata, as having the governing role of the desirable. But as there are different modes of avowal, each supported by different sorts of desiderata, some neutral, some agent- or group-relative, there will be different and conflicting modes of desirability—this, by contrast with credibility. And the need to unify our own judgments of desirability into a single judgment of overall desirability, together with the need to universalize desirability so that it is standardized across individuals, will lead us to generate a notion of multi-lateral desirability that corresponds well with the ordinary notion of moral desirability.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Lagnado, David A., and Tobias Gerstenberg. Causation in Legal and Moral Reasoning. Edited by Michael R. Waldmann. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199399550.013.30.

Full text
Abstract:
Causation looms large in legal and moral reasoning. People construct causal models of the social and physical world to understand what has happened, how and why, and to allocate responsibility and blame. This chapter explores people’s common-sense notion of causation, and shows how it underpins moral and legal judgments. As a guiding framework it uses the causal model framework (Pearl, 2000) rooted in structural models and counterfactuals, and shows how it can resolve many of the problems that beset standard but-for analyses. It argues that legal concepts of causation are closely related to everyday causal reasoning, and both are tailored to the practical concerns of responsibility attribution. Causal models are also critical when people evaluate evidence, both in terms of the stories they tell to make sense of evidence, and the methods they use to assess its credibility and reliability.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Credibility judgment"

1

Skelton, J. A. "Laypersons’ Judgments of Patient Credibility and the Study of Illness Representations." In Mental Representation in Health and Illness, 108–31. New York, NY: Springer US, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9074-9_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Lupia, Arthur. "Building Source Credibility." In Uninformed Why People Seem to Know So Little about Politics and What We Can Do about It. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190263720.003.0013.

Full text
Abstract:
If a person pays attention to a piece of information, they form a judgment about it. In many cases, the judgment is that they do not need to pay more attention to it. In some cases, however, the judgment is that they want to think more about the new information and attempt to integrate its content into what they already believe. What judgments prospective learners form about information affects when and how an educator can increase others’ knowledge and competence. Many civic educators struggle with the fact that information in politicized environments is often judged differently than information offered in other environments. Words and images in politicized environments are scrutinized, interpreted, and attacked in ways that rarely, if ever, occur in other educational settings. Educators who are used to communicating in nonpolitical environments, and who then wade into a politicized environment, often find these dynamics surprising. Actually, “surprising” is a gentle way to put it. Many educators learn that educational strategies that work well in classrooms or at professional conferences are disastrous when attempted in more emotionally charged and politicized environments. Many educators who venture into more politicized contexts find that their information is ignored. Others find their words misinterpreted and twisted. Many have difficulty explaining why their attempts to convey their expertise to others in these important environments were not more constructively received. In this chapter, I examine how communication dynamics change as learning environments become more politicized. To help educators better manage these dynamics, I highlight two factors that affect source credibility in political contexts. These factors are perceived common interests and perceived relative knowledge. Each factor has significant effects on how prospective learners interpret words and images. Educators who understand these dynamics can better identify information that prospective learners are—and are not—likely to believe. Such knowledge can help educa¬tors increase knowledge and competence more effectively—and reduce unwanted surprises. . . . The chapter’s main lessons are as follows: When prospective learners can interpret information in multiple ways, their perceptions of an educator’s motives and expertise can affect whether or not they pay attention to the information and what inferences they draw from it. . . .
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Tian, Junfeng, and He Zhang. "A Credible Cloud Service Model Based on Behavior Graphs and Tripartite Decision-Making Mechanism." In Cloud Security, 903–22. IGI Global, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8176-5.ch047.

Full text
Abstract:
The credibility of cloud service is the key to the success of the application of cloud services. The dual servers of master server and backup server are applied to cloud services, which can improve the availability of cloud services. In the past, the failures between master server and backup server could be detected by heartbeat algorithm. Because of lacking cloud user's evaluation, the authors put forward a credible cloud service model based on behavior Graphs and tripartite decision-making mechanism. By the quantitative of cloud users' behaviors evidences, the construction of behavior Graphs and the judgment of behavior, they select the most credible cloud user. They combine the master server, the backup server and the selected credible cloud user to determine the credibility of cloud service by the tripartite decision-making mechanism. Finally, according to the result of credible judgment, the authors could decide whether it will be switched from the master server to the backup server.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Carter, Jonathan S. "Modal Ethos." In Establishing and Evaluating Digital Ethos and Online Credibility, 291–308. IGI Global, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-1072-7.ch014.

Full text
Abstract:
Traditionally, the artistic proofs center on the individual rhetor as the locusof ethos. However, as communication becomes internetworked, rhetorical phenomena increasingly circulate independent of traditional rhetors. This absence transfers ethos onto textual assemblages that often function as agents in their own right. This transfer of ethos is particularly apparent in memes, where fragmented images constructed across divergent networked media come together to form a single agentic text. Therefore, this chapter argues that a theory of modal ethos is important to understand this artistic proof's role in a networked media ecology. Through a modal analysis of the meme Scumbag Steve, this chapter argues that the modal construction of the meme gives it a unique point of view, complete with narrative history, affective representation, and social expertise—in short, its very own ethos. This allows networked participants to evoke the meme in controversies ranging from NSA wiretapping to the Ukraine Crisis, demanding new forms of political judgment.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Chebi, Hocine. "Unified Approach to Augmented Reality." In Implementing Augmented Reality Into Immersive Virtual Learning Environments, 74–88. IGI Global, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4222-4.ch004.

Full text
Abstract:
The authors present a new and holistic conceptualization on the feeling of presence. This consists of several components. The first two propose a new definition of presence and the identification of a fourth component of presence called presence of action. The third component consists of a unified approach to presence taking into account technological, psychological, and ecological considerations. They have developed a model that identifies the processes leading to the feeling of presence. According to the model, two unconscious phases of judgment condition the emergence of presence. The first judgment concerns the credibility of the environment, which depends on the satisfaction of the user's intellectual and perceptual expectations.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

"Credibility Judgments." In Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, 846. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_3697.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Linn, Ruth. "The Moral Judgment, Action, and Credibility of Israeli Soldiers Who Refused to Serve in Lebanon (1982-1985)." In Selective Conscientious Objection, 129–51. Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429305771-11.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Svein, Magnussen, and Wessel Ellen. "Displayed emotions in court: effects on credibility judgments." In Forensic Psychology in Context, 247–63. Willan, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315094038-14.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

"Source Credibility, Political Knowledge, and Malice in Making Tolerance Judgments – The Texas Experiment." In With Malice toward Some, 133–59. Cambridge University Press, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139174046.011.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Gilmore, Leigh. "Neoliberal Life Narrative." In Tainted Witness, 85–118. Columbia University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.7312/columbia/9780231177146.003.0004.

Full text
Abstract:
Chapter three examines the historicized women’s life narrative as it migrates into the 21st century, via Oprah Winfrey’s Book Club and television show, to the genres of self-help and redemption --analyzes how the memoir scandals of the late 1990s were invoked to discredit Rigoberta Menchú’s testimonio, but also focused additional vitriol at women who wrote about incest and sexual violence within families. The chapter goes on to offer an alternative history of the memoir boom to the conventional association of memoir and confessional culture by dating its beginning to self-representational writing by radical women of color, queer activists, and literary innovators in the 1980s, and uses the response to Kathryn Harrison’s memoir, The Kiss, to demonstrate how judgments about women’s credibility operate across legal and cultural courts of public opinion. The chapter further claims Harrison as pivotal episode in the memoir boom that solidified the power of the backlash and made it a formal part of the boom, and identifies further lack of credibility and social authority as James’ Frey’s memoir, A Million Little Pieces, was attacked. The chapter concludes by examining how Elizabeth Gilbert and Cheryl Strayed revived and redefined memoir to feature a traumatized heroine who may evade critique is she is resilient and sexually well-adjusted
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Credibility judgment"

1

Yamamoto, Yusuke, and Katsumi Tanaka. "Enhancing credibility judgment of web search results." In the 2011 annual conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979126.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Liao, Q. Vera, and Wai-Tat Fu. "Age differences in credibility judgment of online health information." In the 2nd ACM SIGHIT symposium. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2110363.2110404.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Zhang, J., Y. Kawai, S. Nakajima, Y. Matsumoto, and K. Tanaka. "Sentiment Bias Detection in Support of News Credibility Judgment." In 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2011). IEEE, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2011.369.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Song, Shijie, Yuxiang Zhao, Xiaokang Song, and Qinghua Zhu. "The Role of Health Literacy on Credibility Judgment of Online Health Misinformation." In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ichi.2019.8904844.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Thongmak, Mathupayas. "Gratifications and Credibility Judgment of Online Information for Task Completion – A Comparison of Students and Workers." In 32nd Bled eConference Humanizing Technology for a Sustainable Society, June 16 – 19, 2019, Bled, Slovenia. Univresity of Maribor Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.18690/978-961-286-280-0.9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Wang, Xilei, Xueying Li, Wenwu Dai, and Ning Jia. "THE IMPACT OF FEEDBACK AND WARNING ON RETRIEVAL-ENHANCED SUGGESTIBILITY." In International Psychological Applications Conference and Trends. inScience Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.36315/2021inpact102.

Full text
Abstract:
"Retrieval practice can exacerbate eyewitness’ susceptibility to subsequent misinformation and then produces more false memories is known as Retrieval-Enhanced Suggestibility (RES). In the field of judicial psychology, eyewitness testimony plays a crucial role, and even directly affects the judgment of the suspect. The eyewitnesses may be interfered with by other irrelevant information or repeated inquiries by the police, thus causing misinformation interference from the original information. In all three experiments, this study uses pictures of Chinese criminal investigation dramas as experimental materials. This study examines the mechanism of RES effect by manipulating the feedback from retrieval and warning. The results show that: (1) There is still a significant RES effect on the Chinese context; (2) Both feedback and warning play an important role in the generation of RES. Among them, the feedback enhanced the participant’ memory of the original information and reduced the credibility of misinformation. Thus, the RES effect is reduced; (3) Warnings reduce the credibility of all narrative information, thereby reducing the RES effect. In short, both feedback and warning can reduce the RES effect, but the effect of feedback is more positive and precise."
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Cruz de Oliveira, Elcio, and Paula Fernandes de Aguiar. "Evaluation of the Uncertainty in Measurement Versus the Limit of Specification: Qualitative and Quantitative Aspects of Compliance." In 2004 International Pipeline Conference. ASMEDC, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/ipc2004-0302.

Full text
Abstract:
In many cases, the declaration of compliance of a result of measurement is not clear. This is observed when there is a partial superposition of the expanded uncertainty of a quantity with its limit of specification. In these cases, a judgment is required based in pre-established criteria between the client and the supplier. The consequences of an inadequate decision may be disastrous. Either the supplier will have financial losses or it will lose credibility with its client. This work demonstrates how to calculate the probability, for an appropriate confidence level, that the uncertainty associated with the measurement is within the limits that were established in a contract, declaring the compliance or non-compliance relative to the specification, and study two methodologies for helping the claimer to take the decision of compliance or non-compliance, using as example the heat capacity of natural gas, calculated from its gas chromatography. This approach encourages the client/supplier relationship. This occurs because the results are reported to both parts with a probability of compliance instead of a single value. The first methodology is based on the increase in the size of the sample. The second proposal is based in the calibration of the chromatograph against certificate reference materials with more exact and precise uncertainty values.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Aumer-Ryan, Paul R. "Interface effects on digital library credibility judgments." In the 8th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1378889.1378988.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Amar, Haddad, Rached-Kanouni Malika, Badri Boukous, Mokhtar Adjadj, and Walid Medjoub. "STUDY OF THE VIABILITY OF ALEPPO PINE TREES BY USING PHF INDEX." In GEOLINKS Conference Proceedings. Saima Consult Ltd, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.32008/geolinks2021/b2/v3/24.

Full text
Abstract:
This work, which was conducted in the Chettaba forest about the viability of the stands can be given by the PHF index, a three-digit index that gives a judgment of the position of the tree (in relation to the others and thus indicating the dominance and the stage of competition or exposure to the dominant stage), of the general shape of the crowns, and of the shape of the shafts, it allows a more detailed silvicultural interpretation to predict the future of the stand and ultimately deduce the viability of the stands. Thus, there is an essential need for a study to be conducted in this regard to understand the existing problems and to bring about proposals on the appropriate intervention in logged surface. The slenderness coefficient of a tree is defined as the ratio of the total height (H) to the diameter at 1.3 m above ground level (d). For the stand level, the slenderness coefficient is calculated using the root mean square diameter and the average tree height as (H/D). It is well known that there is a direct relationship between the stand slenderness coefficient and the risk of stem breakage. It is well known that there is a direct relationship between the stand slenderness coefficient and the risk of stem breakage or tree fall due to abiotic factors such as wind or snow. Sustainability monitoring is crucial to the credibility, validation, value of the options implemented and should be considered early on in the planning process this allows us to say that these stands are stable in the forest and always in the 6 plots studied. Analyses results show a mid-viability for the forest and more of individual listed present instability which is indicated by a medium stability of forests stand’s quality (PHF = 123) and a slenderness coefficient (H/D = 34.47).
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Akamine, Susumu, Daisuke Kawahara, Yoshikiyo Kato, Tetsuji Nakagawa, Yutaka I. Leon-Suematsu, Takuya Kawada, Kentaro Inui, Sadao Kurohashi, and Yutaka Kidawara. "Organizing information on the Web to support user judgments on information credibility." In 2010 4th International Universal Communication Symposium (IUCS). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iucs.2010.5666759.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography