Relevant bibliographies by topics / COVID-19 vaccination intentions

Academic literature on the topic 'COVID-19 vaccination intentions'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 10 December 2022
Last updated: 28 January 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Contents

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'COVID-19 vaccination intentions.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "COVID-19 vaccination intentions"

1

Lin, Yen-Ju, Yu-Ping Chang, Wen-Jiun Chou, and Cheng-Fang Yen. "Explicit and Intrinsic Intention to Receive COVID-19 Vaccination among Heterosexuals and Sexual Minorities in Taiwan." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 14 (July 7, 2021): 7260. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18147260.

Full text
Abstract:
The present study compared the levels of explicit and intrinsic intention to receive COVID-19 vaccination among sexual minority and heterosexual individuals and examined the association of explicit and intrinsic intentions with sexual orientation. We enrolled 171 sexual minority and 876 heterosexual individuals through a Facebook advertisement. The participants’ explicit and intrinsic intentions to receive COVID-19 vaccination and their risk perception of COVID-19 were measured. We discovered that sexual minority individuals had higher levels of explicit and intrinsic intention to receive vaccination relative to heterosexual individuals. Intrinsic intention was positively associated with explicit intention after the effects of demographic characteristics and risk perception of COVID-19 were controlled for. Sexual orientation did not moderate the association between explicit and intrinsic intentions. The present study determined the relationship between sexual orientation and intention to receive COVID-19 vaccination.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Xin, Meiqi, Sitong Luo, Rui She, Xi Chen, Liping Li, Lijuan Li, Xiaojun Chen, and Joseph T. F. Lau. "The Impact of Social Media Exposure and Interpersonal Discussion on Intention of COVID-19 Vaccination among Nurses." Vaccines 9, no. 10 (October 19, 2021): 1204. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9101204.

Full text
Abstract:
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among nurses is a global public health concern and it is imperative to understand associated factors. Information environment plays a critical role in shaping health behaviors, while few studies explored such effects in the context of COVID-19 vaccination. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1902 nurses in China. The study investigated the effects of social media exposure/interpersonal discussion on intention of COVID-19 vaccination and tested whether perceived effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines (perceived vaccine efficacy, perceived duration of protection, and perceived effectiveness in preventing resurgences) mediated such associations. Results showed that about 68.0% and 56.5% of the participants had an intention of free and self-paid COVID-19 vaccinations, respectively. Frequent social media exposure and interpersonal discussion were positively associated with vaccination intentions. Perceived vaccine efficacy significantly mediated the effects of frequent social media exposure and interpersonal discussion, whereas perceived effectiveness in preventing resurgences suppressed the effects of frequent social media exposure. In conclusion, the prevalence of intention of COVID-19 vaccination was relatively low among Chinese nurses and health promotion is needed. Frequent social media exposure and interpersonal discussion potentially enhanced vaccination intentions via increased perceived vaccine efficacy. The findings can help inform the development of relevant health communication interventions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Shiloh, Shoshana, Shira Peleg, and Gabriel Nudelman. "Vaccination Against COVID-19: A Longitudinal Trans-Theoretical Study to Determine Factors that Predict Intentions and Behavior." Annals of Behavioral Medicine 56, no. 4 (December 1, 2021): 357–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaab101.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Background Despite the clear benefits of vaccination, their uptake against common infectious diseases is suboptimal. In December 2020, vaccines against COVID-19 became available. Purpose To determine factors that predict who will take the COVID-19 vaccine based on a conceptual model. Methods An online survey was administered twice: prior to public vaccination, and after vaccinations were available. Participants were 309 Israelis with initial data and 240 at follow-up. Baseline questionnaires measured intentions to be vaccinated and hypothesized predictors clustered in four categories: background, COVID-19, vaccination, and social factors. Self-reported vaccination uptake was measured at follow-up. Results Sixty-two percent of the sample reported having been vaccinated. Intentions were strongly associated with vaccination uptake and mediated the effects of other predictors on behavior. Eighty-six percent of the variance in vaccination intentions was explained by attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccination, regret for having declined vaccination, trust in vaccination, vaccination barriers, past flu vaccination, perceived social norms, and COVID-19 representations. Conclusions Beliefs related directly to the COVID-19 vaccine explained most of the variance in intentions to vaccinate, which in turn predicted vaccination uptake.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Paridans, Marine, Justine Monseur, Anne-Françoise Donneau, Nicolas Gillain, Eddy Husson, Dieudonné Leclercq, Christelle Meuris, et al. "The Dynamic Relationship between the Intention and Final Decision for the COVID-19 Booster: A Study among Students and Staff at the University of Liège, Belgium." Vaccines 10, no. 9 (September 6, 2022): 1485. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10091485.

Full text
Abstract:
While many studies have documented the intentions for the COVID-19 vaccine booster, few have explored the change from intention to final decision. This study explores the COVID-19 booster intentions and the change from intention to decision in a primo-vaccinated university population, with a distinction between staff members and students. It looks at the sociodemographic and medical characteristics, health literacy, personal COVID-19 infection and vaccination history, and attitudes/intentions regarding the booster, among the 1030 participants (64.4% staff members, 61.3% female, median age 36.0 years). Of the 8.7% who were initially hesitant, 72.7% ultimately got a booster and 27.3% did not. Another 84.2% intended to get a booster and 7.1% did not. Among the latter two groups, 88.9% maintained their intention and 11.1% changed their minds. The determinants associated with the intentions were health literacy and previous intentions regarding the COVID-19 primo-vaccination. The determinants associated with the change to non-vaccination were a previous COVID-19 infection, a past COVID-19 primo-vaccination intention, and a neutralizing antibody level. The results point to an opening for the support in decision-making, with a significant percentage of the study population potentially changing their mind between intention and final decision; this process should start early and be tailored to the individual’s COVID-19 history. A personalized approach seems necessary in order to ensure that individuals make an informed choice.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Pastorino, Roberta, Leonardo Villani, Marco Mariani, Walter Ricciardi, Guendalina Graffigna, and Stefania Boccia. "Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Flu and COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions among University Students." Vaccines 9, no. 2 (January 20, 2021): 70. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9020070.

Full text
Abstract:
Flu vaccination for the general population, and specifically for vulnerable subgroups, brings the potential to reduce the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of mobility, mortality, and hospitalizations. In Italy, flu vaccination is recommended to all ≥6 months of age, even if it is only free of charge for specific categories. We investigated the intentions towards flu and COVID-19 vaccinations from a sample of 436 Italian university students. Results of a web-based survey show that 77.52% of them were willing to get the flu vaccine and 94.73% were willing to be vaccinated against COVID-19 when available. We identified positive predictive factors to undertake flu vaccination as being a medical student, having undertaken a previous vaccination against flu, and having a high level of concern and perceived vulnerability to the COVID-19 pandemic. Reinforced public health activities might consider engaging university students a as possible “positive influencer” towards flu and COVID-19 vaccination programs.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Tong, Kwok Kit, Mu He, Anise M. S. Wu, Le Dang, and Juliet Honglei Chen. "Cognitive Factors Influencing COVID-19 Vaccination Intentions: An Application of the Protection Motivation Theory Using a Probability Community Sample." Vaccines 9, no. 10 (October 12, 2021): 1170. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9101170.

Full text
Abstract:
COVID-19 vaccines have been shown to provide protection against severe disease and death. However, substantial individual differences in vaccination intentions have hindered achieving optimal vaccination rates across the population. To look for efficient strategies to promote vaccination, this study tested whether the protection motivation theory (PMT), a cognitive model based upon threat and coping appraisals, would account for the differences in vaccination intentions under three scenarios (i.e., in the context of getting vaccinated in general, and in the context of high- and low- efficacy for reducing COVID-19 transmission risk). A phone survey was conducted in early 2021 and obtained a probability community sample (n = 472; 49.2% men) in Macao, China. We found that 54.0% of respondents indicated their relatively strong intention to receive COVID-19 vaccination for high-efficacy vaccines, compared to 29.5% for low-efficacy vaccines and 31.0% for vaccines in general. After adjusting for demographics, self-efficacy (i.e., the perceived capability of receiving COVID-19 vaccines) and maladaptive response reward (i.e., the perceived benefits of not receiving COVID-19 vaccines) were consistently associated with COVID-19 vaccination intentions under all three scenarios. The perceived severity of COVID-19 infection and response cost (i.e., the perceived costs of receiving COVID-19 vaccines) were significantly associated with vaccination intention for high-efficacy vaccines, while the response efficacy of lowering the COVID-19 impact with COVID-19 vaccination was positively associated with vaccination intention for general and low-efficacy vaccines. Given that the relative strength of PMT constructs depends on perceived vaccine efficacy, we recommend taking PMT constructs and vaccine efficacy into account for encouraging vaccination.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Burger, Maximilian Nicolaus, Matthias Mayer, and Ivo Steimanis. "Repeated information of benefits reduces COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy: Experimental evidence from Germany." PLOS ONE 17, no. 6 (June 28, 2022): e0270666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270666.

Full text
Abstract:
Background Many countries, such as Germany, struggle to vaccinate enough people against COVID-19 despite the availability of safe and efficient vaccines. With new variants emerging and the need for booster vaccinations, overcoming vaccination hesitancy gains importance. The research to date has revealed some promising, albeit contentious, interventions to increase vaccination intention. However, these have yet to be tested for their effectiveness in increasing vaccination rates. Methods & results We conducted a preregistered survey experiment with N = 1,324 participants in Germany in May/June 2021. This was followed by a series of emails reminding participants to get vaccinated in August and concluded with a follow-up survey in September. We experimentally assess whether debunking vaccination myths, highlighting the benefits of being vaccinated, or sending vaccination reminders decreases hesitancy. In the survey experiment, we find no increase in the intention to vaccinate regardless of the information provided. However, communicating vaccination benefits over several weeks reduced the likelihood of not being vaccinated by 9 percentage points, which translates into a 27% reduction compared to the control group. Debunking vaccination myths and reminders alone also decreased the likelihood, yet not significantly. Discussion Our findings suggest that if soft governmental interventions such as information campaigns are employed, highlighting benefits should be given preference over debunking vaccination myths. Furthermore, it seems that repeated messages affect vaccination action while one-time messages might be insufficient, even for increasing vaccination intentions. Our study highlights the importance of testing interventions outside of survey experiments that are limited to measuring vaccination intentions—not actions—and immediate changes in attitudes and intentions—not long-term changes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Lin, Yen-Ju, Wen-Jiun Chou, Yu-Ping Chang, and Cheng-Fang Yen. "Denial of Justification for Vaccination: Its Multiple Related Variables and Impacts on Intention to Get Vaccinated against COVID-19." Vaccines 9, no. 8 (July 25, 2021): 822. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9080822.

Full text
Abstract:
The aims of the present study were (1) to identify the variables related to denying the justification for vaccination during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in Taiwan and (2) to examine the associations of such denial with perceived risk of COVID-19 and the extrinsic and intrinsic intentions to get vaccinated against COVID-19. We recruited 1047 participants by using a Facebook advertisement. We investigated whether the participants denied justification for vaccination as well as their sociodemographic characteristics, mental health status, sources of information about COVID-19 vaccination, perceived risk of COVID-19, and extrinsic and intrinsic intentions to get vaccinated against COVID-19. The results indicated that 20.0% of the participants denied justification for vaccination. Participants who were older, had an educational level below college, were not health care workers, were in poor general mental health state, or did not obtain information about COVID-19 vaccination from the Internet were more likely to deny justification for vaccination. Denial was negatively associated with both extrinsic and intrinsic intentions to get vaccinated against COVID-19 but not associated with the perceived risk of COVID-19. Multiple variables related to denying the justification for vaccination; the denial was negatively associated with the intention to get vaccinated against COVID-19.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Galdikiene, Laura, Jurate Jaraite, and Agne Kajackaite. "Trust and vaccination intentions: Evidence from Lithuania during the COVID-19 pandemic." PLOS ONE 17, no. 11 (November 23, 2022): e0278060. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278060.

Full text
Abstract:
In this paper, we study the relationship between trust and COVID-19 vaccination intentions. Vaccinating a large share of the population is essential for containing the COVID-19 pandemic. However, many individuals refuse to get vaccinated, which might be related to a lack of trust. Using unique survey data from Lithuania during the COVID-19 pandemic, we show that trust in government authorities, science, and pharmaceutical companies are important predictors of individual vaccination intentions. We do not find evidence that trust in strangers, the healthcare system, or the media predict intentions to get vaccinated against COVID-19.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Koesnoe, Sukamto, Tommy Hariman Siddiq, Dicky C. Pelupessy, Evy Yunihastuti, Ghina Shabrina Awanis, Alvina Widhani, Teguh Harjono Karjadi, et al. "Using Integrative Behavior Model to Predict COVID-19 Vaccination Intention among Health Care Workers in Indonesia: A Nationwide Survey." Vaccines 10, no. 5 (May 4, 2022): 719. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10050719.

Full text
Abstract:
Background: Health care workers (HCWs) are a high-priority group for COVID-19 vaccination for several reasons. Health behavior theory-based studies on the intention or acceptability of COVID-19 vaccination among Indonesian HCWs is lacking. Using an integrated behavioral model, this research sought to identify Indonesian health care workers’ intentions to obtain COVID-19 vaccines. Methods: A countrywide cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was conducted. The questionnaire was constructed on the basis of IBM (integrated behavioral model) constructs and scored on a seven-point bipolar scale. A hierarchical multivariable regression was used to evaluate the fit of the predictor model as well as the correlations between variables in the study. Results: 3304 people responded to the survey. A model combining demographic and IBM characteristics predicted 42.5 percent (adjusted R2 = 0.42) of the COVID-19 vaccination intention. Vaccination intention was associated with favorable vaccine attitudes, perceived norms, and self-efficacy. Among the determining constructs, behavior belief predicted vaccination intention the best. Being female, being married, having a history of COVID-19 infection, living outside Java Island, and having a low income were all linked to lower vaccination intentions. Conclusions: This study confirms the IBM model’s robustness in predicting health care workers’ intention to vaccinate against COVID-19.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "COVID-19 vaccination intentions"

1

Bernardo, João Pedro Martins Sant´Ana. "Impacto da pandemia COVID-19 nas intenções de vacinação." Master's thesis, 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.12/8413.

Full text
Abstract:
Dissertação de Mestrado apresentada no ISPA – Instituto Universitário para obtenção de grau de Mestre na especialidade de Psicologia Clínica
Objetivo: Estudar se em Portugal a vivência da atual pandemia COVID-19, as dúvidas resultantes dessa vivência e do aparecimento das novas vacinas COVID-19, conduziram a um decréscimo na intenção dos indivíduos se vacinarem; avaliar qual o efeito de variáveis como a Literacia em Saúde, Perceção da Doença (COVID-19) e Perceção do Risco nas intenções de vacinação contra a COVID-19 segundo o modelo de correlação de Pearson e pelo modelo de mediação tendo como variáveis mediadoras a Perceção da Doença e a Perceção do Risco. Método: Foram incluídos na análise 454 participantes adultos residentes em Portugal. Para recolha de dados, os instrumentos utilizados foram o Newest Vital Sign (NVS) para medir a Literacia em Saúde, The Brief IPQ, um questionário para medir a Perceção do Risco percebida e comparada e um outro para medir Intenção de Vacinação com o último item dedicado às dúvidas sobre a vacinação (COVID-19). Resultados: Observou-se que não existe correlação entre as variáveis Literacia em Saúde, Perceção da Doença e Perceção do Risco e a Intenção de Vacinação. Não se confirmou o modelo de Mediação com as variáveis mediadoras Perceção da Doença e Perceção do Risco. Os diferentes tipos de dúvidas quanto à vacinação (COVID-19) tiveram um impacto negativo na Intenção de Vacinação. Conclusões: As preocupações com a segurança da vacina devem ser abordadas antes e durante a implementação do programa de vacinação
Objective: To study if in Portugal, the experience of the pandemic COVID-19, the doubts resulting from it and the appearance of new vaccines for COVID-19, lead to a decrease in people’s intention to be vaccinated; to evaluate the effect of variables such as Health Literacy, Illness Perception (Covid-19) and Risk Perception on the intention of vaccination, through Pearson correlation model and the mediation model, which have as mediating variables the Illness Perception and the Risk Perception. Methods: There were included in the analysis 454 adult participants living in Portugal. For the data collection, the instruments used were the Newest Vital Sign (NVS), to measure the Health Literacy, The Brief IPQ, a questionnaire to measure the perceived and compared risk perception and another one for the vaccination intention as the last item was dedicated to doubts regarding the vaccine (COVID-19). Results: It was observed that there isn't any correlation between the variables Health Literacy, Illness Perception and Risk Perception and the Intention of Vaccination. It also wasn't confirmed the mediation model with the Illness Perception and the Risk Perception. The different types of doubts regarding the vaccine (COVID-19) had a negative impact in the intention to be vaccinated. Conclusions: The safety issues regarding the vaccine must be addressed continuously, before and after the implementation of the vaccine program.
, , , n
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "COVID-19 vaccination intentions"

1

Fanggidae, Jappy P., Stella Y. Sahetapy, and Noldy D. P. Mumu. "Gender Differences in Covid-19 Vaccination Intention." In International Conference on Applied Science and Technology on Social Science 2021 (iCAST-SS 2021). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220301.008.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Bruner, Lia, Rachel Gerald, Ban Majeed, and Matthew Heiken. "Intention for COVID-19 vaccination: Predictors and sources of influence." In NAPCRG 49th Annual Meeting — Abstracts of Completed Research 2021. American Academy of Family Physicians, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1370/afm.20.s1.3004.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "COVID-19 vaccination intentions"

1

Presseau, Justin, Laura Desveaux, Upton Allen, Trevor Arnason, Judy L. Buchan, Kimberly M. Corace, Vinita Dubey, et al. Behavioural Science Principles for Supporting COVID-19 Vaccine Confidence and Uptake Among Ontario Health Care Workers. Ontario COVID-19 Science Advisory Table, March 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.47326/ocsat.2021.02.12.1.0.

Full text
Abstract:
Health Care Workers (HCWs) are the backbone of Ontario’s COVID-19 pandemic response and are a key vaccination priority group. About 80% of Ontario HCWs intend to receive COVID-19 vaccine.1 Challenges include the logistics of delivering the vaccine to this mobile and diverse group and improving vaccine confidence in the remaining 20%. These challenges can be overcome by allaying safety concerns and highlighting personal benefits; tailoring messages to factors associated with lower intention (e.g. age, gender, ethnicity and work setting); employing trusted leaders to set the tone and peers to build social norms; and leveraging public health organizations and health institutions as existing channels of influence.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'COVID-19 vaccination intentions' for particular source types:
Journal articles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography