Academic literature on the topic 'Cover crops termination method'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Cover crops termination method.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Cover crops termination method"
Kornecki, Ted S., and Corey M. Kichler. "Effectiveness of Cover Crop Termination Methods on No-Till Cantaloupe." Agriculture 12, no. 1 (January 5, 2022): 66. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12010066.
Full textWortman, Sam E., Charles A. Francis, Mark A. Bernards, Erin E. Blankenship, and John L. Lindquist. "Mechanical Termination of Diverse Cover Crop Mixtures for Improved Weed Suppression in Organic Cropping Systems." Weed Science 61, no. 1 (March 2013): 162–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/ws-d-12-00066.1.
Full textSunuwar, Sachina, Arthur Siller, Samantha Glaze-Corcoran, and Masoud Hashemi. "Cover Crop Termination Method and N Fertilization Effects on Sweet Corn Yield, Quality, N Uptake, and Weed Pressure." Nitrogen 4, no. 1 (January 25, 2023): 37–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nitrogen4010005.
Full textKornecki, Ted S., and Stephen A. Prior. "Engine Exhaust Heat Device for Terminating Cover Crops in No-Till Vegetable Systems." Applied Engineering in Agriculture 35, no. 5 (2019): 787–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.13031/aea.13101.
Full textAskew, M. Carter, Charles W. Cahoon, Michael L. Flessner, Mark J. VanGessel, David B. Langston, and J. Harrison Ferebee. "Chemical termination of cover crop rapeseed." Weed Technology 33, no. 5 (August 8, 2019): 686–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/wet.2019.50.
Full textDuzy, Leah M., and Ted S. Kornecki. "Effects of cover crop termination and cotton planting methods on cotton production in conservation systems." Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 34, no. 5 (December 14, 2017): 406–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1742170517000631.
Full textDavis, Adam S. "Cover-Crop Roller–Crimper Contributes to Weed Management in No-Till Soybean." Weed Science 58, no. 3 (September 2010): 300–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1614/ws-d-09-00040.1.
Full textWayman, Sandra, Craig Cogger, Chris Benedict, Ian Burke, Doug Collins, and Andy Bary. "The influence of cover crop variety, termination timing and termination method on mulch, weed cover and soil nitrate in reduced-tillage organic systems." Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 30, no. 5 (July 8, 2014): 450–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1742170514000246.
Full textDepalo, Laura, Giovanni Burgio, Serena Magagnoli, Daniele Sommaggio, Francesco Montemurro, Stefano Canali, and Antonio Masetti. "Influence of Cover Crop Termination on Ground Dwelling Arthropods in Organic Vegetable Systems." Insects 11, no. 7 (July 15, 2020): 445. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/insects11070445.
Full textMcKenzie, Sean C., Hayes B. Goosey, Kevin M. O'Neill, and Fabian D. Menalled. "Integration of sheep grazing for cover crop termination into market gardens: Agronomic consequences of an ecologically based management strategy." Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 32, no. 5 (September 29, 2016): 389–402. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1742170516000326.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Cover crops termination method"
BEN, HASSINE MORTADHA. "GROWTH, NITROGEN UPTAKE AND MAIZE NITROGEN RECOVERY OF COVER CROPS IN CONSERVATION AGRICULTURE." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/2434/702471.
Full text(6596888), Stephanie A. DeSimini. "Evaluation of Weed Suppression and Termination Timings of Cereal Rye (Secale cereale L.) and Canola (Brassica napus L.) as Winter Cover Crops in Indiana." Thesis, 2019.
Find full textIt is estimated that in the United States, agronomic weeds are responsible for about 50% of crop yield loss, costing nearly $27 billion each year. As interest in cover crops across the Midwest increases, so does the need to understand when to terminate cover crops for maximum weed control while still maintaining crop yield. Field experiments were conducted in 2017 and 2018 in Indiana to evaluate the effect of cover crop termination timings on weed control, and corn and soybean yield. Cereal rye (Secale cereale L.) and canola (Brassica napus L.) were subjected to early- or late- termination utilizing glyphosate-, saflufenacil- or glufosinate-based burndown herbicide programs. In corn, cereal rye and canola reduced early season weed biomass by 58 to 67% compared to fallow (no cover crop) plots. Cereal rye and canola reduced horseweed (Erigeron canadensis L.) and giant ragweed (Ambrosia trifida L.) emergence by 42 to 50% compared to fallow plots. Early- and late- terminated cereal rye reduced corn yields by 55 to 67% (5,173 to 7,116 kg ha-1) compared to canola or fallow plots. In soybean, cereal rye and canola reduced early season weed biomass by 73 to 88% compared to fallow plots. Cereal rye and canola reduced horseweed emergence in 2017 and 2018 by 16 to 67 % compared to fallow plots. In 2017, both cover crop and termination timing influenced giant ragweed emergence. Early- and late- terminated cover crop plots reduced giant ragweed emergence by 50 to 76% compared to fallow plots. In 2018, cover crop termination timing influenced soybean yield. Late-terminated plots reduced yields by 48% compared to early-terminated plots. Results from this study suggest that cereal rye and canola planted at these rates can be effective for weed suppression prior to corn and soybeans, however, yield loss in both corn and soybean is expected.
Reports from Indiana in 2015 suggested that growers planting canola as a cover crop were experiencing difficulties when terminating with glyphosate prior to corn and soybean production. This suggests the utilization of inadequate herbicide programs, or perhaps a seed contamination event containing glyphosate resistant canola. Field experiments were conducted in 2016 and 2017 to determine the most effective herbicide treatment for terminating glyphosate resistant canola in Indiana, and to quantify how these herbicide programs influence corn yield. Canola was planted in early September and herbicide treatments were applied in the spring three weeks before corn planting. Visual ratings of control and above-ground biomass reduction were collected 21 days after treatment (DAT). The highest control of canola occurred following the application of paraquat + saflufenacil + 2,4-D or metribuzin, resulting in 88 to 94% control. These control ratings are supported by applications with paraquat + saflufenacil + 2,4-D or metribuzin resulting in 88 to 97% biomass reduction. Auxin herbicides alone provided very poor control, less than 41% at both locations. In general, saflufenacil-containing herbicide treatments provided the highest control of canola compared to mesotrione or atrazine. Herbicide treatments had no effect on corn grain yield.
Book chapters on the topic "Cover crops termination method"
García-Álvarez, David, and Javier Lara Hinojosa. "Global Thematic Land Use Cover Datasets Characterizing Agricultural Covers." In Land Use Cover Datasets and Validation Tools, 399–417. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90998-7_20.
Full textMaduri, Praveen Kumar, Tushar Biswas, Preeti Dhiman, Apurva Soni, and Kushagra Singh. "Leaf Disease Detection Using AI." In Data Preprocessing, Active Learning, and Cost Perceptive Approaches for Resolving Data Imbalance, 110–36. IGI Global, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7371-6.ch006.
Full text"Sexual and reproductive health." In Tasks for Part 3 MRCOG Clinical Assessment, edited by Sambit Mukhopadhyay and Medha Sule. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198757122.003.0021.
Full textFarhana, Nikhat, Ripudaman M. Singh, Mohammed Gulzar Ahmed, Thouheed Ansari, Abdul Rahamanulla, Ayesha Sultana, Treesa P. Varghese, Ashwini Somayaji, and Abdullah Khan. "Seed Biology and Phytochemistry for Sustainable Future." In Seed Biology Updates [Working Title]. IntechOpen, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.106208.
Full text"mosquitoes. What is the impact of such ecological change and what will it look like in the future? 9.6.2 Mosquito or aquatic plant control? The options for control of aquatic plants such as Hydrilla are mechanical, biological, chemical, or a combination of these methods. The objective of aquatic weed control should be to control growth sufficiently to permit the water to be used in the desired way but without a change in the balance of species (Bill 1977). Aquatic plants are only weeds if they pose a major nuisance or hazard. Clearly there is a case as mentioned previously for clearing buffer zones to mitigate against swimmer’s itch or to facilitate boating and safe swimming. Aquatic plant growth generally relies upon nutrient availability, light availability, adequate physicochemical characteristics and habitat stability. Nutrient availability relies upon substrate type and the presence of dissolved organic and inorganic matter. Light intensity decreases with depth to the point where the energy acquired by photosynthesis cannot meet the energy requirement of vegetation and plant growth ceases. The interrelationships of key factors such as depth, wave exposure, littoral slope and sediment characteristics are complex (Duarte and Kalff 1990), although slopes of greater than 15° are regarded as the first limit to plant growth and the second is depth. The Ross River reservior is shallow with an average depth of less than 3 m, which explains why Hydrilla beds sometimes cover up to 37 per cent of the surface area of the lake. Bill (1977) discussed a protocol for deciding the best and most effective control measures to be used and outlined a checklist of questions. • To what extent is plant growth responsible for the particular problem, e.g. reduction of channel capacity, interference with recreational use? • Are chemical methods of control more suitable than mechanical or biological methods, or could more than one method be used? • What is the most economical long-term approach? • What degree of control is required to provide adequate relief from the particular problem? • If chemical methods are most appropriate, which material is likely to be most effective and how should it be used? Are residues of chemicals in the water following a treatment likely to be detrimental to human health or to fish, wildlife or irrigated crops? • Is it desirable to retain some plants for the benefits of fish and waterbirds? Biological control is not the universal solution to all pest problems, but it may be applied to a vast array of problems and when effective it is the most satisfactory and economical form." In Water Resources, 152. CRC Press, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203027851-39.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Cover crops termination method"
Khot, Mahesh Balwant. "Life cycle assessment (LCA) of microbial oil-derived fuels and other non-fuel products." In 2022 AOCS Annual Meeting & Expo. American Oil Chemists' Society (AOCS), 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.21748/imol9786.
Full text