Dissertations / Theses on the topic 'Cover crop'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 dissertations / theses for your research on the topic 'Cover crop.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse dissertations / theses on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
Munda, Bruce, Tim C. Knowles, Art Meen, Vic Wakimoto, and Bill Worthy. "Winter Forage Cover Crop Trials." College of Agriculture, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 1998. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/208283.
Full textEss, Daniel R. "Cover crop residue effects on machine-induced soil compaction." Diss., This resource online, 1994. http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-06062008-164819/.
Full textArnet, Kevin Broc. "Cover crops in no-tillage crop rotations in eastern and western Kansas." Thesis, Manhattan, Kan. : Kansas State University, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/4086.
Full textChristenson, Andi Marie. "Cover crops for horseweed [Conyza canadensis (L.)] control before and during a soybean crop." Thesis, Kansas State University, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/19230.
Full textDepartment of Agronomy
J. Anita Dille
Kraig Roozeboom
Increasing numbers of herbicide-resistant weed species require alternative methods of weed suppression to be examined. This study quantified the interaction between various cover crop or herbicide systems and horseweed [Conyza canadensis (L.)] growth. Fall cover crops of winter wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.)], winter rye [Secale cereal (L.)], barley [Hordeum vulgare (L.)] and annual ryegrass [Lolium multiflorum (L.)] were seeded in November 2012 and 2013. Spring cover crop of oat [Avena sativa (L.)] was seeded in April 2013 or rye was seeded in March 2014. All cover crops were no-till seeded into grain sorghum stubble [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Four herbicide treatments were fall or spring applied, with and without residual. The spring non-residual treatment was also applied to plots of winter rye. Cover crop plots were split and terminated with a roller crimper or glyphosate application prior to soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] planting to determine the effect of termination method on treatment performance. Soybean was planted in June 2013 and May 2014 and mechanically harvested in October of both years. Horseweed density, biomass accumulation, and soybean yield data were quantified. Horseweed height, whole plant seed production, and seed subsamples were recorded in the untreated fallow control, winter wheat, and winter rye plots in 2014. Horseweed suppression by winter rye approached 90%, levels similar to suppression by herbicide systems. In both years, herbicide plots had less than half the horseweed biomass than any of the cover crop systems. In 2013, soybean yields in herbicide plots were at least 1,500 kg ha[superscript]-1, nearly more than double yields in cover crop plots. Soybean yields in 2014 were more consistent across treatments; barley and spring rye plots achieved yields equal to or greater than 2,000 kg ha[superscript]-1. Winter rye and winter wheat reduced horseweed seed production by 60% compared to the untreated fallow control, with no effect on individual seed weight. Seed production varied across plants, with the untreated control producing the greatest number of seeds. Cover crops were successful at reducing horseweed biomass, suppressing horseweed pressure, preserving soybean biomass, and protecting soybean yields when compared to a fallow untreated control.
Kern, James D. "Water Quality Impacts of Cover Crop/Manure Management Systems." Diss., Virginia Tech, 1997. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/40385.
Full textPh. D.
Abel, David Scott. "Cover crop effects on soil moisture and water quality." Thesis, Kansas State University, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/34650.
Full textDepartment of Agronomy
Nathan O. Nelson
Eutrophication of freshwater lakes and streams is linked to phosphorus (P) fertilizer loss from agriculture. Cover crops could help mitigate P loss but producers are concerned that they may use too much water. This study was conducted to better understand the effects cover crops have on soil moisture and P loss. Volumetric water content (θ) was measured at the Kansas Cover Crop Water Use research area at 10 depths throughout a 2.74 m soil profile in 5 cover crop treatments and compared to θ measured from a chemical fallow control. Total profile soil moisture in sorghum sudangrass (1.02 m) and forage soybean (1.03 m) did not significantly differ from chemical fallow (1.05 m) at the time of spring planting. However, water deficits were observed in double-crop soybean (1.01 m), crimson clover (0.99 m), and tillage radish (0.99 m). At the Kansas Agricultural Watersheds, runoff was collected and analyzed for total suspended solids, total P, and DRP from 6 cover crop/fertilizer management treatments over two years. In the first water year the cover crop reduced runoff, sediment, and total P loss by 16, 56, and 52% respectively. There was a significant cover by fertilizer interaction for DRP loss. When P fertilizer was broadcasted in the fall with a cover crop, DRP loss was reduced by 60% but was unaffected in the other two P fertilizer treatments. Results were different in the second water year. The cover crop reduced sediment loss (71% reduction), as was seen in year one, but neither the cover crop nor the fertilizer management had a significant effect on runoff volume or total P loss overall. Contrary to the 2014-2015 results, cover crop increased DRP load by 48% in 2015-2016. DRP load was 2 times greater in the fall broadcast treatment than it was in the spring injected treatment but there was not a significant fertilizer by cover crop interaction. In order to determine the long term effects of cover crops and P fertilizer management P loss parameters should be tracked for several more years.
Collins, Amanda Shea. "Leguminous cover crop fallows for the suppression of weeds." [Gainesville, Fla.] : University of Florida, 2004. http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/etd/UFE0007018.
Full textWang, Guangyao (Sam), and Kurt Noite. "Summer Cover Crop Use in Arizona Vegetable Production Systems." College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ), 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/147024.
Full textSummer cover crops can add nitrogen to the soil, build up and maintain soil organic matter, suppress pest populations, mitigate soil erosion, and reduce nutrient leaching when they are used in Arizona vegetable systems. However, careful management is required since cover crops can modify the availability of soil nitrogen and other critical nutrients. The ratio between carbon to nitrogen (C:N) in decomposing cover crop biomass is a critical indicator of the overall process of breakdown and eventual release of nutrients. This article introduces five cover crops that could improve vegetable systems in Arizona. The mixtures of a legume and a non-legume cover crop species can also be planted to obtain desired C:N ratios to optimize the benefits of cover crops.
GABBRIELLI, MARA. "MEASURING AND MODELLING COVER CROP GROWTH AND AGRONOMIC EFFECTS." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano, 2022. https://hdl.handle.net/2434/949531.
Full textDavis, Cathryn Joyce. "Cover crops for soil health and forage." Thesis, Kansas State University, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/34537.
Full textDepartment of Agronomy
DeAnn R. Presley
Cover crops have numerous benefits and while cover crops have been used for centuries, currently there are few producers in Kansas growing them and so there is a need for additional research on how cover crops affect soil properties, and on the potential for utilizing cover crops as forage. Two studies are presented in this thesis. The first study evaluated the use of cover crops in a vegetable production system as compared to a fully tilled control. This study evaluated soil physical properties in the form of wet aggregate stability and infiltration, and microbial properties by soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC). Over the three year study, the most pronounced differences observed were in the wet aggregate stability between the cover crop and control treatments where the cover crop treatments had better soil aggregation compared to the control. At the conclusion of the study, there was not a difference between fall and spring planted cover crop treatments. The second study evaluates species composition and forage quality of various combinations of multi-species cover crop mixtures. This study evaluated sixteen treatments, each consisting of a three-way mixture of a brassica (turnip or radish), grass (rye, wheat, barley, oat), and a legume (berseem clover or Austrian winter pea). Species composition analysis found that the brassica species dominated the mixtures (60-80% by mass on a dry weight basis) in 2014 while the grass species were dominant (62 – 67%) in 2015. Overall all treatments produced prime quality forage (as compared to hay values), however some treatments cost significantly more to plant than others. Therefore an economic analysis compared the treatments and found that the treatments containing turnips and oats generally provided the best return on investment given that both of these species were among the cheapest to plant and produced moderate to high biomass compared to the other treatments. The results of these projects point to the potential benefits that cover crops can have for producers interested in improving soil or utilizing cover crops for forage.
Subedi-Chalise, Kopila. "Impacts of Crop Residue and Cover Crops on Soil Hydrological Properties, Soil Water Storage and Water Use Efficiency of Soybean Crop." Thesis, South Dakota State University, 2017. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10265200.
Full textCover crops and crop residue play a multifunctional role in improving soil hydrological properties, soil water storage and water use efficiency (WUE). This study was conducted to better understand the role of crop residue and cover crop on soil properties and soil water dynamics. The study was conducted at the USDA-ARS North Central Agricultural Research Laboratory, located in Brookings, South Dakota. Two residue removal treatments that include low residue removal (LRR) and high residue removal (HRR) were established in 2000 with randomized complete block design under no-till corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) rotation. In 2005, cover crop treatments which include cover crops (CC) and no cover crops (NCC) were integrated into the overall design. Soil samples were collected in 2014, 2015 and 2016. Data from this study showed that LRR treatment resulted in lower bulk density (BD) by 7 and 9% compared to HRR in 2015 and 2016, respectively, for 0-5 cm depth. Similarly, LRR treatment significantly reduced soil penetration resistance (SPR) by 25% in 0-5 cm depth compared with HRR treatment. In addition to this, LRR treatment significantly increased soil organic carbon (SOC) concentrations and total nitrogen (TN) by 22 and 17%, respectively, in 0-5 cm. Similarly, CC treatment resulted in lower BD and SPR by 7% and 23%, respectively, in 0-5 cm depth in 2015 compared with NCC treatment. The LRR significantly increased soil water infiltration by 66 and 22% compared to HRR in 2014 and 2015, respectively. Similarly, the CC treatment significantly increased infiltration by 82 and 22% compared to the NCC in 2014 and 2015, respectively. The significant impact of a crop residue was observed on soil water retention (SWR) in 2014 and 2015 for the 0-5 cm depth. The LRR and CC treatments increased the soil volumetric moisture content (VMC) and soil water storage (SWS) on the surface 0-5 cm depth. However, the trend was not always significant during the growing season. The CC treatment significantly impacted the soybean yield by 14% and WUE by 13% compared with NCC treatment. Some interaction of residue by cover crops was observed on BD, SPR, VMC, and SWS, which showed that the use of cover crops with LRR can be beneficial in improving the soil properties.
Hänninen, K. (Kaarina). "Tree - cover crop interactions: birch growth, competition and soil properties." Doctoral thesis, University of Oulu, 2002. http://urn.fi/urn:isbn:9514267184.
Full textVollmer, Emily R. "Cover Crop Mulches for No-till Organically Managed Onion Production." NCSU, 2008. http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/theses/available/etd-11062008-105026/.
Full textHänninen, Kaarina. "Tree-cover crop interactions : birch growth, competition and soil properties /." Oulu : Oulun Yliopisto, 2002. http://herkules.oulu.fi/isbn9514267184.
Full textSciarresi, Cintia Soledad. "OPTIMIZING COVER CROP ROTATIONS FOR WATER, NITROGEN AND WEED MANAGEMENT." UKnowledge, 2019. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/pss_etds/122.
Full textMalnou, Cathy. "A canopy approach to nitrogen recommendation for the sugar beet crop." Thesis, University of Nottingham, 2003. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.288992.
Full textGrindlay, Douglas J. C. "Principles governing the ability of cover crop species to trap nitrate." Thesis, University of Nottingham, 1995. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.294723.
Full textWittenberg, Alex Shawn Robert. "Optimizing Winter Camelina Production as a Cover Crop In North Dakota." Thesis, North Dakota State University, 2020. https://hdl.handle.net/10365/31735.
Full textSievers, Taylor Jo. "Cover Crop Characteristics and Impacts on Agronomic Systems in Southern Illinois." OpenSIUC, 2016. https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/theses/2001.
Full textPeterson, Alan Tollof. "Intersowing Cover Crops Into Standing Soybean in the Upper Midwest." Thesis, North Dakota State University, 2019. https://hdl.handle.net/10365/31688.
Full textAndersen, Bryce James. "Integrating Faba Bean (Vicia faba Roth) into Cropping Systems as a Cover Crop, Intercrop, and Late-Season Forage Compared with Other Legume Cover Crops in the Upper Midwest." Thesis, North Dakota State University, 2019. https://hdl.handle.net/10365/31542.
Full textSigdel, Sailesh. "Seeding Time and Interseeded Cover Crop Species Influence Sugarbeet Yield and Quality." Thesis, North Dakota State University, 2020. https://hdl.handle.net/10365/31884.
Full textStout, Breanna. "Short term effects of annual ryegrass, red clover and hairy vetch cover crops on various indicators of soil health." Thesis, Kansas State University, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/2097/18716.
Full textDepartment of Biological and Agricultural Engineering
Philip L. Barnes
The world’s population has passed 7 billion and is expected grow to more alarming numbers by the year 2050. The increase in human life on the planet ushers the need to responsibly and sustainably grow more food. In order to meet the demand necessary, it is crucial that soil remains healthy and crop yields continue to increase in efficiency. Irresponsible or ill-informed practices can lead to depleted resources and degradation of fertile soils that may limit a producers’ ability to sustainably grow food. Cover crops are a tool that can be used to address issues the modern producer may face. Cover crops have been shown to increase cash crop productivity, improve soil health by improving soil physical and chemical properties as well as providing protection from soil erosion runoff or nutrient leaching. A study was conducted in 2014 to examine the short term effects associated with cover cropping systems. The effects of ryegrass, red clover and a cover crop cocktail (mixture of ryegrass, red clover and hairy vetch) compared to bare tilled and bare control plots were studied. The five treatments were replicated three times in a completely randomized study and analyzed. Soil physical health indicators such as bulk density and porosity were calculated. Soil and cover crop nutrient use, as well as, soil moisture content data was collected and analyzed using excel and ANOVA statistical procedures. In the short term, the study found that there was only statistically significant differences between cover cropping regimens, tilled and control plots in regards to biomass production and biomass nutrient concentrations (α=0.05). The cocktail mix provided more biomass, N and P than the ryegrass and clover plots alone. Observable differences in cover crop volumetric soil moisture and water used between plots demonstrated that cover crops utilize soil moisture in the short term, which must be considered in areas experiencing water stress. Although more long-term data is needed to truly quantify how cover crops effect various aspects of soil health, this study demonstrated how cover crops have the potential for providing numerous benefits such as increased erosion control, lower reliance on anthropogenically created nutrients and the reduction of weeds. Overall the benefits associated with cover crops are still being researched and while adoption of cover cropping systems has been slow, a push towards agricultural sustainability while increasing food production will increase the amount of producers utilizing cover crops in the coming years.
Avila-Segura, Laura M. "Potential benefits of cover crop based systems for sustainable production of vegetables." [Gainesville, Fla.] : University of Florida, 2006. http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/etd/UFE0015763.
Full textGardner, Megan Bates. "Cover Crop Root Contributions to Soil Quality in an Organiz Maine Agroecosystem." Fogler Library, University of Maine, 2005. http://www.library.umaine.edu/theses/pdf/GardnerMB2005.pdf.
Full textKoivisto, Jason M. "Semi-leafless peas : a cover crop for establishing lucerne or red clover." Thesis, Coventry University, 2002. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.246331.
Full textOmwega, Asenath Kwamboka. "Crop cover, rainfall energy and soil erosion in Githunguri (Kiambu district), Kenya." Thesis, University of Manchester, 1989. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.257360.
Full textMcClung, Tamara Nicole. "Sweet Corn Germination, Growth, and Yield After a Rye Winter Cover Crop." Thesis, The University of Arizona, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/311795.
Full textOdhiambo, Jude Julius Owuor. "Effect of cereal/grass and legume cover crop monocultures and mixtures on the performance of fall-planted cover crops, soil mineral nitrogen and short-term nitrogen availability." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1998. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk2/ftp02/NQ34601.pdf.
Full textSamson, Roger A. (Roger Anthony). "On-farm evaluation of cultivation, cover crops and chemical banding for crop and weed management in integrated farming systems." Thesis, McGill University, 1989. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=55700.
Full textBilek, Meredith K. "Winter annual rye cover crops in no-till grain crop rotations impacts on soil physical properties and organic matter /." College Park, Md.: University of Maryland, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/1903/7268.
Full textThesis research directed by: Dept. of Natural Resource Sciences and Landscape Architecture. Title from t.p. of PDF. Includes bibliographical references. Published by UMI Dissertation Services, Ann Arbor, Mich. Also available in paper.
Johnson, Jennifer. "Residual Nutrient Removal by a Winter Cover Crop From Broiler Litter Amended Soils." TopSCHOLAR®, 2007. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/424.
Full textLooker, Wayde. "Effect of Relative Maturity on Soybean Yield and Cover Crop Biomass Evaluation Methods." The Ohio State University, 2019. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1554894697089079.
Full textSeman-Varner, Rachel Nicole. "The role of cover crops in agroecosystem functioning." Diss., Virginia Tech, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/83232.
Full textPh. D.
Boglaienko, Daria. "Buckwheat as a Cover Crop in Florida: Mycorrhizal Status, Soil Analysis, and Economic Assessment." FIU Digital Commons, 2013. http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/921.
Full textFinney, Denise McKinney. "Evaluation of sorghum sudangrass as a summer cover crop and marketable hay crop for organic, no-till production of fall cabbage." NCSU, 2005. http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/theses/available/etd-03282005-141749/.
Full textTreadwell, Danielle Dion. "Tillage and cover crop management influence weeds, insects, soil and crop nutrients, crop development and yield in organically managed North Carolina sweetpotato Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam. systems." NCSU, 2005. http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/theses/available/etd-06182005-181203/.
Full textKelley, Tracy. "Efficacy, Phytotoxicity, and Cover Crop Response of Herbicide Combinations in Dark Fire Cured Tobacco." TopSCHOLAR®, 2000. http://digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/724.
Full textHackman, Jacob James. "THE EFFECTS OF COVER CROPS ON THE SOIL MICROBIOME: A METAGENOMICS STUDY." OpenSIUC, 2018. https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/theses/2401.
Full textSmith, Joshua Dwayne. "Impacts of Cover Crops on Carbon Dioxide and Nitrous Oxide Flux from a Row Crop Agricultural Field in Central Illinois." OpenSIUC, 2014. https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/theses/1391.
Full textHagarty, Brooke Danielle. "The Impacts of Cover Crops and Tillage on Nitrate-N Concentrations in Soil Water in Southern Illinois Row Crop Agriculture." OpenSIUC, 2019. https://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/theses/2502.
Full textMcNairn, Heather Elizabeth. "Radar response to crop residue cover and tillage application on post-harvest agricultural surfaces." Thesis, National Library of Canada = Bibliothèque nationale du Canada, 1999. http://www.collectionscanada.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk1/tape8/PQDD_0017/NQ47579.pdf.
Full textBarona, Elizabeth. "Identifying the role of crop production in land cover change in Brazil, 1990-2006." Thesis, McGill University, 2009. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=32278.
Full textLa production agricole du Brésil a changé significativement durant la dernière décennie. De nouvelles cultures ont été adoptées afin de répondre à la croissance de la demande mondiale pour des produits d'exportation brésiliens – une demande qui a occasionné des changements substantiels au niveau de l'utilisation et de la couverture du sol, principalement caractérisés par l'accroissement à large échelle de la mécanisation de l'agriculture, de la déforestation et de l'intensification de l'agriculture. Le Brésil met à disposition de l'information concernant la production agricole au niveau municipal. Cette information a été analysée par le biais d'un Système d'Information Géographique (SIG) afin d'étudier les changements dans la distribution spatiale de la production de différentes cultures et d'élevage au Brésil de 1990 à 2006. De plus, afin de mieux comprendre la relation entre l'expansion agricole et la déforestation, des données spatiales ont été analysée statistiquement pour l'Amazone Légale pour une période allant de 2000 à 2006. Les résultats indiquent que des changements dans les patrons spatiaux ont en effet pris place au centre et au nord-est du Brésil ainsi qu'au sud de la région amazonienne. Les zones prévues pour cultiver le soja et la canne-à-sucre ont augmenté, surpassant même les surfaces semées pour des cultures vivrières qui ont par ailleurs enregistrées une diminution significative. L'extension de ces cultures a exercé une pression sur les autres cultures et sur les élevages bovins, les poussant à l'intérieur de la forêt amazonienne durant la période 1990-2006. Au cours de la même période, alors q
Jacobs, Addison Denae. "Influence of Cover Crop Species on Soil Physical Properties in a Corn-soybean Rotation." Thesis, Arkansas State University, 2018. http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=10831039.
Full textAs crop land decreases and population increases, soil quality is becoming a concern. Utilizing cover crops in cropping systems could improve soil quality. This study examined 16 treatments of single-species cover crops, cover crop mixes, and two control treatments on a silt-loam soil, in a corn ( Zea mays L.) - soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) crop rotation under no-tillage, to determine their effect on soil physical properties. Cover crop biomass differed (p<0.10) among treatments and produced a maximum of 15.6 Mg ha-1 of biomass in the crimson clover treatment. Water infiltration rates increased as much as 282% in the complete-mix treatment compared to the fallow control. Differences in infiltration rates due to cover crop species were shown in two-years. However, these results suggest that it may take more time for cover crops to affect change in bulk density and aggregate stability.
Wolters, Bethany Rose. "To Mix or Not to Mix: Performance and Management of Diverse Cover Crop Mixtures." Diss., Virginia Tech, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/96592.
Full textDoctor of Philosophy
Cover crop (CC) are planted in between cash crops to protect the soil from erosion, improve soil quality, and supply N to next cash crop through biological N fixation or soil N scavenging. Traditionally, CC were single species, but new CC methodologies utilize mixtures of three or more species planted together to protect soils as well as produce high biomass to suppress weeds, conserve soil moisture, and improve soil quality. A long-term study was initiated in fall 2014 in Painter, VA to observe CC mixture effects on no-till (NT) corn (Zea mays), wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and soybean (Glycine max) rotations on CC performance, N cycling, cash crop yield, and soil quality of a sandy, low organic matter soil. Twelve treatments were created that compared NT rotations with CC monocultures, CC mixtures of 3-9 species, and without CC. In the third year corn was grown in all 12 rotations and four N rates were applied (0, 56, 112 and 156 kg N ha-1). To evaluate CC mixture performance in rotations, CC biomass, CC N accumulation and corn and soybean yield was measured over three years. To evaluate changes in soil quality, nine soil physical, chemical and biological soil properties were measured after three years of NT and CC. Biomass production varied significantly each experimental year (5633 kg ha-1 in year 1, 755 kg ha-1 in year 2, 5370 kg ha-1 in year 3) due to climate and agronomic differences, but CC mixtures were the highest biomass producing CC each spring and accumulated the highest amount of N. Cover crop mixtures had equal corn and soybean yield as CC monocultures. In year 3 corn yield and was greater in treatments with CC than in treatments without CC and was greater in legume dominated monocultures and mixtures than majority grass CC mixtures and monocultures. After 3 years of CC and NT, some soil quality parameters improved. Indicators of soil biology (soil respiration, earthworm populations, and soil microbial biomass C) increased in CC treatments. However, some soil physical and chemical properties (infiltration rate, bulk density, pH and EC) did not improve. In conclusion, adding CC mixtures to crop rotations shows promise for producing high CC biomass, accumulating N, and increasing crop yields, while also improving some soil quality parameters that are important for agricultural systems.
Trott, Donna M. "Assessing near-field naturally occurring isothiocyanates emissions after mustard green manure cover crop incorporation." Pullman, Wash. : Washington State University, 2009. http://www.dissertations.wsu.edu/Thesis/Summer2009/d_trott_071609.pdf.
Full textTitle from PDF title page (viewed on Aug. 7, 2009). "School of Earth and Environmental Sciences." Includes bibliographical references.
Couedel, Antoine. "Analysis of performances of crucifers-legumes cover crop mixtures to provide multiple-ecosystem services." Thesis, Toulouse, INPT, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018INPT0097/document.
Full textMulti-services cover crops (MSCC) grown during fallow period between two cash crops provide various ecosystem services. Among species used as MSCC, crucifers can efficiently prevent nitrate and sulphate leaching by catching residual soil mineral nitrogen (N) and sulphur (S) afterthe preceding cash crop (N and S catch crop services). Crucifers also have a unique capacity to suppress pathogens due to the biocidal hydrolysis products of endogenous secondary metabolites called glucosinolates (GSL). The aim of our study was to assess the provision of various ecosystem services linked to N, S cycles and biocontrol potential for a wide range of bispecific crucifer-legume mixtures in comparison to sole cover crops of legume and crucifer. We carried out experiments in 2 contrasted sites (Toulouse and Orléans regions, France) during 2 years in order to assess these services and the compatibility of various bi-specific crucifer-legume mixtures. We tested a great diversity of species, such as i) crucifers : rape, white mustard, Indian mustard, Ethiopian mustard, turnip, turnip rape, radish and rocket, and ii) legumes: Egyptian clover, crimson clover, common vetch, purple vetch, hairy vetch, pea, soya bean, faba bean, and white lupin. Our study demonstrated that crucifer-legume mixtures can provide and mutualize various ecosystem services by reaching from 2 thirds (GSL production, S and N green manure) to the same level ofservice (N and S catch crop) than the best sole family of species. GSL profile and concentration did not change in mixtures meaning that crucifer-pests interactions were identical. Through a literature review we also illustrated that biocontrol services of crucifers could be largely maintained in crucifer-legume mixtures for a wide range of pathogens and weeds while reducing potential disservices on beneficials and increasing N related service
Askew, Matthew Carter. "Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) Termination and Integration of Halauxifen into Virginia Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) Production." Thesis, Virginia Tech, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/86786.
Full textMaster of Science in Life Sciences
Cover crops are an important part of cropping systems in the United States, especially in the Mid-Atlantic region. Producers utilize cover crops to aid in weed suppression, reduce soil erosion, as well as to increase soil health. Cereals, legumes, and Brassicaceae species are popular cover crops planted either as monocultures or mixtures. Rapeseed can become problematic due to its difficulty to terminate once it enters reproductive stage, as well as its podshattering characteristic. Experiments were conducted to evaluate various herbicides and herbicide combinations for rapeseed termination two application timings. At three locations where rapeseed averaged 12 cm in height at early termination, and 52 cm in height at late termination, glyphosate + 2,4-D was most effective, controlling rapeseed (96%) 28 days after early termination (DAET). Paraquat + atrazine + atrazine (92%), glyphosate + saflufenacil (91%), glyphosate + dicamba (91%), and glyphosate (86%) all provided at least 80% control 28 DAET. Paraquat + 2,4-D (85%), glyphosate + 2,4-D (82%), and paraquat + atrazine + mesotrione (81%) were the only treatments to provide at least 80% control 28 days after late termination (DALT). At one location where rapeseed was much taller (41 cm early termination; 107 cm late termination), herbicides were much less effective, as no herbicide treatments provided greater than 80% control. Results indicated that rapeseed size at time of termination was more critical to successful termination than herbicide choice. Prior to the development of glyphosate-resistant horseweed, producers were able to control horseweed and other weeds with glyphosate applied preplant burndown. Producers now rely on auxin herbicides tank mixed with glyphosate and a residual herbicide to control horseweed and other winter weeds prior to cash crop planting. Experiments were conducted to evaluate halauxifen-methyl, a new Group 4 herbicide, for control of horseweed and other commonly encountered winter annual weeds. Halauxifen (89%) controlled small horseweed (<5 cm in height at time of application) similar to dicamba (91%), while providing better control of large horseweed (79%) (>15 cm in height at time of application) than either dicamba (77%) or 2,4-D evaluated (64%). Halauxifen provided adequate control (>80%) of henbit (Lamium amplexicaule L). and purple deadnettle (Lamium purpureum L.), while failing to effectively control of cutleaf evening-primrose (Oenothera laciniata Hill), curly dock (Rumex crispus L.), purple cudweed (Gamochaeta purpurea L. Cabrera), common chickweed (Stellaria media L. Vill.), and mousear chickweed (Cerastium L.). Results indicate that halauxifen has a narrow spectrum of control and should be tank mixed with 2,4-D or glyphosate in order to control weeds other than horseweed and henbit. Glyphosate plus dicamba or 2,4-D plus a residual herbicide is typically applied prior to cotton planting. Previous research has shown that as long as rainfall requirements and rotation intervals are met, no adverse effects on cotton is observed from 2,4-D or dicamba herbicides. Little is known of cotton tolerance to halauxifen applied preplant burndown. Experiments were conducted to determine if halauxifen applied sooner than the labeled 30-day rotation interval would injure cotton. Very little injury was observed from halauxifen (9%) applied at-planting, however dicamba (26%) and 2,4-D (21%) applied at the same timing did injure cotton. Auxin herbicides applied earlier in the season resulted in little injury (<2%). Early season injury was transient as cotton recovered later in the season and seedcotton yield was unaffected.
Henry, David Christopher. "Nitrogen Contribution from Red Clover for Corn Following Wheat in Western Ohio." The Ohio State University, 2010. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1293556551.
Full textSchmitt, Mattie Bree. "Factors Affecting Establishment and Growth of Cover Crops in a Corn-Soybean Rotation." Thesis, North Dakota State University, 2020. https://hdl.handle.net/10365/31758.
Full text