Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Cost benefit analysis / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Cost benefit analysis.

Journal articles on the topic 'Cost benefit analysis'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 30 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Cost benefit analysis.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

LAKSHMI,, M. VIJAYA. "COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS." International Scientific Journal of Engineering and Management 03, no. 05 (May 25, 2024): 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.55041/isjem01828.

Full text

Abstract:

The cost benefit analysis helps in finding out the relationship of costs and revenues to output. It enables the financial manager to study the general effect of the level of output upon income and expenses and therefore upon profits. Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) estimates and totals up the equivalent money value of the benefits and costs to the community of projects to establish whether they are worthwhile. Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) measures a project's societal value by quantifying the project's societal effects and making costs and benefits comparable in monetary terms.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Skaburskis, Andrejs. "Cost-Benefit Analysis." Evaluation Review 11, no. 5 (October 1987): 591–611. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193841x8701100502.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Robinson, R. "Cost-benefit analysis." BMJ 307, no. 6909 (October 9, 1993): 924–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.307.6909.924.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Ney, John P., David N. van der Goes, and Jon H. Watanabe. "Cost–Benefit Analysis." Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 30, no. 3 (June 2013): 280–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/wnp.0b013e3182933d8f.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Miura, Grant. "Cost–benefit analysis." Nature Chemical Biology 14, no. 10 (September 17, 2018): 903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41589-018-0139-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Price, Adrienne. "Cost benefit analysis." Nursing Management 7, no. 9 (February 2001): 25–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/nm.7.9.25.s8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Gupta, Dr Rakesh. "Implementing IFRS in India- A Cost / Benefit Analysis." Paripex - Indian Journal Of Research 3, no. 2 (January 15, 2012): 14–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.15373/22501991/feb2014/116.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Wilkinson, David. "Cost-Benefit Analysis Versus Cost-Consequences Analysis." Performance Improvement Quarterly 12, no. 4 (October 22, 2008): 71–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-8327.1999.tb00149.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Iliescu, Mihai, and Remus Ciocan. "Cost-Benefit Analysis for Investments Supervised by Modern Technologies." Indian Journal of Applied Research 3, no. 4 (October 1, 2011): 93–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.15373/2249555x/apr2013/154.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Tazid Ali, Tazid Ali, and Rubab F. Nomani. "Uncertainty modeling : A case study in cost-benefit analysis." International Journal of Scientific Research 2, no. 12 (June 1, 2012): 115–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.15373/22778179/dec2013/38.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Sunstein, Cass R. "Some Costs & Benefits of Cost-Benefit Analysis." Daedalus 150, no. 3 (2021): 208–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01868.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract The American administrative state has become a cost-benefit state, at least in the sense that prevailing executive orders require agencies to proceed only if the benefits justify the costs. Some people celebrate this development; others abhor it. For defenders of the cost-benefit state, the antonym of their ideal is, alternately, regulation based on dogmas, intuitions, pure expressivism, political preferences, or interest-group power. Seen most sympathetically, the focus on costs and benefits is a neo-Benthamite effort to attend to the real-world consequences of regulations, and it casts a pragmatic, skeptical light on modern objections to the administrative state, invoking public-choice theory and the supposedly self-serving decisions of unelected bureaucrats. The focus on costs and benefits is also a valuable effort to go beyond coarse arguments, from both the right and the left, that tend to ask this unhelpful question: “Which side are you on?” In the future, however, there will be much better ways, which we might consider neo-Millian, to identify those consequences: 1) by relying less on speculative ex ante projections and more on actual evaluations; 2) by focusing directly on welfare and not relying on imperfect proxies; and 3) by attending closely to distributional considerations–on who is helped and who is hurt.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

CHICHILNISKY, GRACIELA. "The costs and benefits of benefit-cost analysis." Environment and Development Economics 2, no. 2 (May 1997): 195–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x97230160.

Full text

Abstract:

Among the tools of the economic trade, cost-benefit analysis is the most widely used in policy circles. Asking whether there is a role for cost-benefit analysis is like asking whether there is a role for the weatherman. Of course there is.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Williges, Chris, and Mahmoud Mahdavi. "Transportation Benefit–Cost Analysis." Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2079, no. 1 (January 2008): 79–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2079-11.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Adler, Matthew D., and Eric A. Posner. "Rethinking Cost-Benefit Analysis." Yale Law Journal 109, no. 2 (November 1999): 165. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/797489.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Leslie, Mitch. "HIV's cost/benefit analysis." Journal of Experimental Medicine 206, no. 4 (March 30, 2009): 727. http://dx.doi.org/10.1084/jem.2064iti5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Linn, Mott. "Cost‐benefit analysis: examples." Bottom Line 24, no. 1 (May 31, 2011): 68–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08880451111142123.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Liddle, John, Matt Wright, and Bronte Koop. "Cost-benefit analysis explained." Evaluation Journal of Australasia 15, no. 2 (June 2015): 33–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1035719x1501500205.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Bairagya, Indrajit, and Saumya Chakrabarti. "Social Cost-Benefit Analysis." Indian Economic Journal 58, no. 4 (January 2011): 128–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0019466220110408.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Hough, J. R. "Educational Cost-benefit Analysis." Education Economics 2, no. 2 (January 1994): 93–128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09645299400000013.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Atkinson, Giles, and Susana Mourato. "Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis." Annual Review of Environment and Resources 33, no. 1 (November 2008): 317–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.020107.112927.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Sunstein, Cass R. "Humanizing Cost-Benefit Analysis." European Journal of Risk Regulation 2, no. 1 (March 2011): 3–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1867299x00000556.

Full text

Abstract:

In the last twenty months, the Obama Administration has been taking an approach to regulation that is distinctive in three ways.First, we have approached regulatory problems not with dogma or guesswork, but with the best available evidence of how people really behave.Second, we have used cost-benefit analysis in a highly disciplined way, not to reduce difficult questions to problems of arithmetic, but as a pragmatic tool for cataloguing, assessing, reassessing, and publicizing the human consequences of regulation – and for obtaining public comment on our analysis. This emphasis on human consequences – on reducing or eliminating unjustified burdens on the private sector and on ensuring that high costs are justified by high benefits – is especially important in a period of economic difficulty. We have worked to put into place important safeguards while also making regulation compatible with the economic recovery, and while reducing the risk that costly regulations will have adverse effects on job creation, wages, prices, and economic growth as a whole.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Iaccarino, Maurizio. "A cost/benefit analysis." EMBO reports 1, no. 6 (December 2000): 454–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/embo-reports/kvd121.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

SAILAJA, Ch V. S. S., and P. V. N. PRASAD. "COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS OF A DG INTEGRATED SYSTEM: CASE STUDY." Acta Electrotechnica et Informatica 17, no. 3 (September 2017): 8–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.15546/aeei-2017-0019.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Dedović, Nedeljka. "Selection of economically rational investments through cost benefit analysis." Ekonomski signali 17, no. 2 (2022): 95–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/ekonsig2202095d.

Full text

Abstract:

Business decision making is an act of choosing between at least two competing simultaneously available investment alternatives. Cost benefit analysis enables direct and indirect measurement of all relevant costs and benefits expected in the future based on a given investment project. It enables the justification of investments and the expediency of redirecting capital to investment projects. However, cost benefit analysis is not a method of general optimization because it deals with the comparison of two or more alternatives, neither of which has to be the economic optimum. The goal of cost benefit analysis is the careful selection of alternatives that best meet the set objectives in the field of relevant constraints. The choice of economically rational investments through cost benefit analysis is the topic of this paper.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Söderbaum, Peter. "Benefit, Cost and Beyond. the Political Economy of Benefit-Cost Analysis." Journal of Economic Issues 22, no. 1 (March 1988): 285–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1988.11504752.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Szekeres, Szabolcs. "Discounting in cost-benefit analysis." Society and Economy 33, no. 2 (August 1, 2011): 361–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/socec.33.2011.2.7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

FUJIOKA, Akifusa. "Cost-Benefit Analysis under Uncertaity." Studies in Regional Science 18 (1987): 39–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2457/srs.18.39.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Adler, Matthew. "Incommensurability and Cost-Benefit Analysis." University of Pennsylvania Law Review 146, no. 5 (June 1998): 1371. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3312809.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Hahn, Robert W. "Equity in cost-benefit analysis." Science 372, no. 6541 (April 29, 2021): 439. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.abg9534.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Alaoui, Larbi, and Antonio Penta. "Cost-Benefit Analysis in Reasoning." Journal of Political Economy 130, no. 4 (April 1, 2022): 881–925. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/718378.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Pires, C. "Sustainability and Cost—Benefit Analysis." Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 30, no. 12 (December 1998): 2181–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a302181.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

ESCHER, DORIS T. W. "Cost/Benefit Analysis for Reuse." Clinical Progress in Electrophysiology and Pacing 3, no. 1 (February 1985): 64–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.1985.tb01692.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Myers, Lorena, and Fazil T. Najafi. "Performance Bond Benefit–Cost Analysis." Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2228, no. 1 (January 2011): 3–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2228-01.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Campbell, M. K. "The benefit of cost analysis." IEEE Potentials 20, no. 4 (2001): 27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/45.969592.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Linn, Mott. "Cost‐benefit analysis: a primer." Bottom Line 23, no. 1 (June 2010): 31–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/08880451011049687.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Spence, D. "Beware the cost-benefit analysis." BMJ 345, jul25 2 (July 25, 2012): e5040-e5040. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e5040.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Hausken, Kjell. "Cost benefit analysis of war." International Journal of Conflict Management 27, no. 4 (October 10, 2016): 454–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-04-2015-0023.

Full text

Abstract:

Purpose Among the many perspectives to analyze war, such as rational actor, organizational process, governmental politics and ethics, the perspective that actually incorporates the costs and benefits into a systematic theoretical structure has hardly been analyzed. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the costs and benefits perspective. Design/methodology/approach Three kinds of value are distinguished, i.e. human, economic and influence. Different actors (politicians, populations, stakeholders, etc). assign different weights to the three kinds of value. Six gradually more complicated models are developed. The first subtracts losses from gains for the three kinds of value. Thereafter, the paper accounts for multiple periods, time discounting, attitude towards risk, multiple stakeholders, subcategories for the three kinds of value, sequential decision-making and game theory. Findings The rich theoretical structure enables assessing costs and benefits more systematically and illuminatingly. The cost benefit analysis is illustrated with the 2003-2011 Iraq War. The paper estimates gained and lost value of human lives, economic value and influence value, and show how different weights impact the decision of whether to initiate war differently. Originality/value The paper provides scientists and policy makers with a theoretical structure within which to evaluate the costs and benefits of war, accounting for how different actors estimate weights, the future, risk and a variety of parameter values differently.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Broome, John. "Cost‐Benefit Analysis and Population." Journal of Legal Studies 29, S2 (June 2000): 953–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/468101.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Kornhauser, Lewis A. "On Justifying Cost‐Benefit Analysis." Journal of Legal Studies 29, S2 (June 2000): 1037–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/468104.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Sunstein, Cass R. "Cognition And Cost‐Benefit Analysis." Journal of Legal Studies 29, S2 (June 2000): 1059–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/468105.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

QUIGGIN, JOHN. "ALTRUISM AND BENEFIT-COST ANALYSIS*." Australian Economic Papers 36, no. 68 (June 1997): 144–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8454.1997.tb00827.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Ogasawara, Katsuhiko. "Cost Minimization/Effectiveness/Benefit Analysis." Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology 63, no. 5 (2007): 516–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.63.516.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Goddeeris, John H., and Thomas P. Bronken. "Benefit-Cost Analysis of Screening." Medical Care 23, no. 11 (November 1985): 1242–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198511000-00003.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

OLDHAM, R. K. "PVB Chemotherapy: Cost-Benefit Analysis." JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute 82, no. 8 (April 18, 1990): 714. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/82.8.714.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Johansson, Per-Olov. "Altruism in cost-benefit analysis." Environmental and Resource Economics 2, no. 6 (November 1992): 605–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00330286.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Gowid, Samer, Farayi Musharavati, and Abdelmajid Hamouda. "Cost Benefit Analysis of a Net-Zero Energy Housing in Qatar." Journal of Clean Energy Technologies 7, no. 3 (May 2019): 36–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.18178/jocet.2019.7.3.507.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Hoang, Nguyen Thanh. "Cost-benefit Analysis of FDI: FDI Barriers and Firm Internal Capabilities." Revista Gestão Inovação e Tecnologias 11, no. 3 (June 30, 2021): 1371–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.47059/revistageintec.v11i3.2016.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

RAY, ANANDARUP. "Cost–benefit analysis and the environment." Environment and Development Economics 2, no. 2 (May 1997): 195–221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x9726016x.

Full text

Abstract:

The thrust of the principles enunciated in Arrow et al. is that economic benefits and costs can be a great help in organizing disparate concerns, in identifying issues, and in designing regulatory policies and individual projects with environmental impact. While this true, I must disagree with the authors that 'formal benefit-cost analysis should not be viewed as either necessary or sufficient for designing sensible public policy' (p. 201). At least there can be little doubt that cost-benefit analysis is necessary for sensible policy. I comment below from the perspective of devloping countries.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Johannesson, Magnus. "The relationship between cost-effectiveness analysis and cost-benefit analysis." Social Science & Medicine 41, no. 4 (August 1995): 483–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)00353-u.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

WELSH, BRANDON C., and DAVID P. FARRINGTON. "Correctional Intervention Programs and Cost-Benefit Analysis." Criminal Justice and Behavior 27, no. 1 (February 2000): 115–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093854800027001007.

Full text

Abstract:

A program is economically efficient if its monetary benefits outweigh its monetary costs. Discussions of the economic efficiency of correctional intervention and other crime and offender prevention programs can be very persuasive and have gained wide appeal in political, policy, and academic settings. However, little is known about the economic efficiency of crime prevention strategies. This article examines the contribution, both methodological and empirical, of cost-benefit analyses of correctional intervention programs designed to reduce reoffending in the community. A review of the literature revealed only seven published studies that have presented information on monetary costs and benefits. Future cost-benefit research on correctional intervention should be concerned with standardizing the measurement of costs and benefits, especially in well-designed studies comparing experimental and control groups with before and after measures of offending. A standard list of monetary costs and benefits that should be measured in all studies is needed.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!