Dissertations / Theses on the topic 'Cosmopolitan Right'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 22 dissertations / theses for your research on the topic 'Cosmopolitan Right.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse dissertations / theses on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
Parker, Owen. "The ethics of cosmopolitan government in Europe : subjects of interest/subjects of right." Thesis, University of Warwick, 2010. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/3921/.
Full textSvöfudottir, Sigurros. "Membership, Morality and Global Justice : A Study of Feminist Contributions to Cosmopolitan Ethics." Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Teologiska institutionen, 2019. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-383127.
Full textMenezes, Rodrigo Ramos Lourega de. "Direito cosmopolita: regime jurídico ou apenas filosofia? Pressupostos, sistematização e o caso do direito de visita internacional." Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, 2014. http://www.bdtd.uerj.br/tde_busca/arquivo.php?codArquivo=6738.
Full textThis thesis aims at questioning the existence of the Cosmopolitan Law not only as a philosophical category, but also as a legal regime itself. To achieve so, this study investigates the Cosmopolitan Laws theoretical and material assumptions, agreeing with both its abstract and empiric existence as a proper legal regime. Under these assumptions, the Cosmopolitan Law is translated from a philosophical discourse to a legal one, being: (a) defined; (b) distinguished from the Natural Law, International Law, Community Law, and the International Law of Human Rights; and (c) systematized in accordance with certain categories which are relevant to the Law studies such as sources, object, subjects, sanctions and limits. Finally, a conceptually-elaborated outlining of the Cosmopolitan Law is verified in the concrete case of the right of visit to a foreign territory. This experiment leads to conclusions that favour the human rights effectiveness worldwide.
Metcalfe, Eric William. "Are cultural rights human rights? : a cosmopolitan conception of cultural rights." Thesis, University of Oxford, 2000. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:c2002d1f-98de-4131-a758-58a8bb84d85d.
Full textBernier, Louise 1975. "Justice in genetics : intellectual property and human rights from a cosmopolitan liberal perspective." Thesis, McGill University, 2006. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=103148.
Full textIt thus appears necessary to analyse the way current assumptions define what is just and acceptable with regard to global access and distribution of resources in this field. Indeed, given the importance of genetics to human health globally, this thesis will evaluate two principal legal regimes---intellectual property and international human rights---to determine to which extent they further the goal of distributing the benefits of these technologies equitably and globally. This evaluation is vital to ensure that legal regimes assist in ensuring that this promising field develops in a way that improves global health without leaving the most vulnerable outside of the process. This dissertation will undertake this complex task by employing and building upon cosmopolitan liberal theories developed over the few last decades as an extension of the work of Rawls and Daniels.
A theoretical framework to justify engaging in a global and more equitable redistribution of benefits produced by genetics is required. Ultimately, our analysis will produce strong normative benchmarks based on justice considerations for engaging in a global and more equitable redistribution of the benefits likely to emerge from genetic science. Universal consideration of all human beings, importance of health needs, normal functioning and equality of opportunities are some of the notions that will be analysed to construct this framework. We will then attempt to determine how and if this theory of distribution translates into positive law and to identify and analyse the main obstacles to legal compliance with global distributive justice. We will assess two main international normative systems: intellectual property law and human rights law to determine if their underlying philosophy, structure, and functioning take account of the principles highlighted in our theoretical framework and how underlying politics and economics matter.
This will set out a basis for further discussion on how we could work around some of the major obstacles identified throughout our analysis. It will also help us move from the vague and often symbolic ideal of benefit sharing actually prevailing toward the establishment of a real, enforceable concept of global benefit sharing in health that would position genetics at the rank of essential tool for achieving global health.
Cilliers, Judy-Ann. "The refugee as citizen : the possibility of political membership in a cosmopolitan world." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/96022.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: The aim of this thesis is to determine what responsibilities democratic states have toward refugees. This problem is stated within the broader framework of the tension inherent in all democratic states: on the one hand, the sovereign right of a state over its territory and, on the other hand, the cosmopolitan or universal human rights norms upon which the state‟s constitution is founded. I argue that this tension is brought to the fore when refugees cross borders and enter into democratic territories, asking for protection and claiming their human rights. The sheer magnitude of the refugee crisis makes this an issue every state should address. My answer to the question of state responsibility is worked out in four phases. Firstly, I give a conceptual clarification of refugeehood, sovereignty, and cosmopolitanism. I show that neither absolute sovereignty (which implies closed borders) nor extreme cosmopolitanism (which implies no borders) is desirable. Secondly, I draw on Immanuel Kant‟s cosmopolitan theory as a possible solution. Kant proposes a world-federation of states in which right is realised on the civic, international, and cosmopolitan level. Kant also insists that every individual has the right to hospitality – a right which foreign states should recognise. Thirdly, I examine three prominent theories which could offer us a way to address the refugee crisis. I argue that the first two – multiculturalism and John Rawls‟ „law of peoples‟ – are not adequate responses to the refugee crisis, but that the third – Seyla Benhabib‟s cosmopolitan federalism – is more promising. Hospitality is the first responsibility states have toward refugees, and Benhabib proposes that it be institutionalised by (i) forming a federation of states founded on cosmopolitan principles, (ii) revising membership norms through the political process of democratic iterations, and (iii) extending some form of political membership to the state to refugees. Lastly, I justify the claim that political membership should be extended by referring to Hannah Arendt‟s argument that the ability to speak and act publicly is part of what it means to be human. If we deny refugees this ability, or if we deny them access to political processes, we deny their humanity. Benhabib proposes institutional measures to ensure that this does not happen, including allowing for political membership on sub-national, national, and supranational levels. Ultimately, I argue that democratic states have the responsibility to (i) allow entry to refugees, (ii) give refugees legal status and offer protection, and (ii) extend political membership to them on some level.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Die doel van hierdie tesis is om te bepaal wat die verantwoordelikhede van demokratiese state teenoor vlugtelinge is. Ek plaas hierdie probleem binne die breër raamwerk van die onderliggende spanning in demokratiese state: die soewereine reg van ‟n staat oor sy grondgebied, aan die een kant, en die kosmopolitiese of universele menseregte-norme waarop die staat se grondwet berus, aan die ander kant. Ek argumenteer dat hierdie spanning na vore gebring word wanneer vlugtelinge, op soek na beskerming, grense oorsteek, demokratiese state binnetree en aanspraak maak op hulle regte. Ek bespreek die vraagstuk in vier stappe. Eerstens verduidelik ek die begrippe van vlugtelingskap, soewereiniteit en kosmopolitisme. Ek toon aan dat nóg absolute soewereiniteit (wat geslote grense impliseer), nóg ekstreme kosmopolitisme (wat geen grense impliseer) ‟n wenslike ideaal is. Tweedens kyk ek na Immanuel Kant se kosmopolitiese teorie vir ‟n moontlike oplossing. Kant stel voor dat state saamkom in ‟n wêreld-federasie, om sodoende reg te laat geskied op die plaaslike, internasionale, en kosmopolitiese vlak. Kant dring ook aan daarop dat elke individu die reg tot gasvryheid besit, ‟n reg wat ook deur ander state buiten die individu se staat van herkoms erken behoort te word. Derdens ondersoek ek drie prominente teorieë wat moontlike oplossings bied vir die vlugteling-krisis. Ek argumenteer dat die eerste twee – multikulturalisme en John Rawls se „law of peoples‟ – nie voldoende is om die vlugteling-krisis die hoof te bied nie. Die derde teorie, Seyla Benhabib se kosmopolitiese federalisme, blyk meer belowend te wees. Benhabib stel voor dat die staat se verantwoordelikheid om gasvryheid te toon geïnstitusionaliseer kan word deur (i)‟n federasie van state gegrond op kosmopolitiese beginsels te vorm, (ii) lidmaatskap-norme te hersien deur ‟n politieke proses genaamd demokratiese iterasie, en (iii) politieke lidmaatskap van een of ander aard aan vlugtelinge toe te ken. Laastens regverdig ek die aanspraak op lidmaatskap. Ek verwys na Hannah Arendt se argument dat die vermoë om in die publieke sfeer te praat en dade te kan uitvoer, deel uitmaak van wat dit beteken om ‟n mens te wees. As ons verhoed dat vlugtelinge hierdie twee vermoëns kan uitleef, ontken ons hulle menslikheid. Benhabib stel sekere institutionele maatreëls voor om dit te voorkom. Dit sluit politieke lidmaatskap op ‟n sub-nasionale, nasionale, en supra-nasionale vlak in. Uiteindelik argumenteer ek dat demokratiese state se verantwoordelikhede teenoor vlugtelinge uit die volgende bestaan: (i) toegang tot hierdie state se grondgebied, (ii) wetlike status en beskerming, en (iii) politieke lidmaatskap op een of ander vlak.
Assumpção, San Romanelli. "Justiça e gênero sob uma perspectiva cosmopolitana." Universidade de São Paulo, 2012. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8131/tde-12042013-101835/.
Full textThe thesis explores a normative proposal of solving some of the well-known genders problems of inequality and infringement of womans basic liberties from a feminist and cosmopolitan point of view. It assumes the axiom of human moral equality as its normative grounds although it attempts to achieve a feminist liberal approach quite different from Martha Nussbaums Woman and Human Development The Capabilities Approach. To that end the research tries to conceive how gender tensions could be entailed by a theory of justice. Notwithstand the crucial distinctions between local, social and cosmopolitan justice, the work proposes a reinterpretation of the Rawlsian concept of basic structure, as the main subject of justice, in which both feminism and cosmopolitanism aims can be fit into the axiom of moral human equality. One of thesis main objectives is to sustain the requirements of a cosmopolitan equalisandum as a feasible and morally relevant way to set up inviolable areas of individuality concerning protection against gender violence. A rank of cosmopolitan primary goods also promotes the effectiveness of a series of exit rights: from the local context to the global one. It aims an ideal of full exit right to women that is entirely compatible with the liberal ideal of toleration.
Ferreira, Rafael Fonseca. "O estado e o direito entre pós-modernidade e globalização: limites e possibilidades do direito fraterno na sociedade cosmopolita." Universidade do Vale do Rio do Sinos, 2008. http://www.repositorio.jesuita.org.br/handle/UNISINOS/2427.
Full textNenhuma
As presentes reflexões tiveram por objetivo descrever o cenário de um tempo efêmero, redimensionado espacialmente e de ampla interconectividade econômica e cultural, bem como definir os fenômenos contemporâneos que determinaram a narrada efemeridade, a qual foi identificada por um tempo descrito como pós-moderno; a transformação dos espaços e interconexão transfronteiriça, foi identificada por um fenômeno conhecido como globalização. Em seguida, se buscou problematizar as questões da pós-modernidade e da globalização confrontando-as com as atuais conformações do Estado e do Direito, no sentido de demonstrar suas deficiências para responder as questões deste novo tempo e as possibilidades de transformação para o atendimento das novas demandas sociais, jurídicas e políticas da sociedade pós-moderna e do mundo globalizado. A partir disso, com as algumas idéias de Höffe e Kant, empreendeu-se na democracia, como aspecto fundamental para o enfrentamento deste novo cenário de uma sociedade marcada pelas incertezas,
Nadai, Bruno. "\"Teleologia e história em Kant: a Idéia de uma história universal de um ponto de vista cosmopolita\"." Universidade de São Paulo, 2007. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8133/tde-01112007-152730/.
Full textThis dissertation intends to examine the article Idea for an universal history with a cosmopolitan purpose considering its insertion into Kant´s philosophical system. The claim is to show that this article can be interpreted according to the system of critical philosophy In the Transcendental Dialectic of Pure Reason´s Appendix, the rational principle of systematic unity of cognitions of the understanding allows the organization of nature by teleological laws. We think that the Idea for an universal history with a cosmopolitan purpose was written according to this teleological representation of nature. Adopting cosmopolitan right as a guide principle, Kant establishes the human actions as a continuous progress of humanity towards the realization of all rational natural dispositions, as if the species followed a principle of nature.
Freitas, Rita de Cássia Souza Tabosa. "O olhar cosmopolita: a atualidade da proposta kantiano para a paz perpétua." Universidade Federal da Paraíba, 2011. http://tede.biblioteca.ufpb.br:8080/handle/tede/5612.
Full textCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPES
Objective, in this research work, discuss the proposal cosmopolitan Kantian perpetual peace and its current two hundred years after it was written. During the course of the study identified at least three major models of cosmopolitanism: the Imperial, the messianic, Republican, to which Kant joins. Cosmopolitanism is his first formulations in antiquity, at the time of the Hellenistic and Roman empires, which will be taken up by medieval Christianity, the messianic version. It is however in modern times that the cosmopolitan ideal reappear with strength, especially in the Enlightenment period in the work of thinkers such as Abbé de Saint‐Pierre, Rousseau, and Immanuel Kant, who gave the most complete formulation philosophically. It fell to associate the theme cosmopolitan Kant to the problem of peace and the constitutionalization of international law by proposing a World Federation of Free States, which promoted legal equality between the different peoples who inhabit the earth, under the aegis of a new international law cosmopolitical. The update of this discussion occurred in the twentieth century, as a possible solution to the immense problems of a world traumatized by two world wars and the atomic terror. The proposal is part of the cosmopolitan globalization process of recent decades in the international legal sphere, as an effective mechanism for building a global civil society of peace, and to prepare the way for a World Federation of States, provided by Kant. Philosophers of law and politics as Kelsen, Habermas and Bobbio, seeking to update and reinterpret the Kantian proposal in the light of the new phenomena of war and peace in the era of globalization, they oppose the realist thinkers such as Danilo Zolo, who question the theoretical validity and practical feasibility of this project. The thesis I defend is that cosmopolitanism is not an impossible utopia, but a realizable possibility, at least in a philosophical and legal approach, when faced with political and legal challenges of contemporary international relations, since some conditions are created for its implementation.
Objetiva-se, neste trabalho de pesquisa, discutir a proposta cosmopolita kantiana de paz perpétua e a sua atualidade, duzentos anos depois de ter sido escrita. Durante o percurso da pesquisa identificamos pelo menos três grandes modelos de cosmopolitismo: o imperial, o messiânico, o republicano, ao qual Kant se filia. O cosmopolitismo encontra suas primeiras formulações na Antiguidade, na época dos Impérios helenísticos e romanos, que serão retomadas pelo cristianismo medieval, na versão messiânica. É, porém na época moderna que o ideal cosmopolita reaparece com força, sobretudo no período iluminista, na obra de pensadores como o Abbè de Saint-Pierre, Rousseau, e Immanuel Kant, que lhe deu a formulação filosoficamente mais completa. Coube a Kant associar a temática cosmopolita ao problema da paz e à constitucionalização da legislação internacional através da proposta de uma Federação Mundial de Estados Livres, que promovesse a igualdade jurídica entre os diferentes povos que habitam a Terra, sob a égide de um novo direito internacional cosmopolítico. A atualização dessa discussão ocorreu no século XX, como uma possível solução para os imensos problemas de um mundo traumatizado por duas guerras mundiais e pelo terror atômico. A proposta cosmopolita se insere no processo de globalização das últimas décadas na esfera jurídica internacional, como um mecanismo eficaz para a construção de uma sociedade civil global de paz, bem como para preparar o caminho para uma Federação Mundial de Estados, prevista por Kant. Filósofos do direito e da política como Kelsen, Habermas e Bobbio, procuram atualizar e reinterpretar a proposta kantiana á luz dos novos fenômenos da guerra e da paz na época da globalização; a eles se contrapõem os pensadores realistas, como Danilo Zolo, que questionam a validade teórica e a viabilidade prática deste projeto. A tese que defendemos é que o cosmopolitismo não é uma utopia irrealizável, mas uma possibilidade realizável, pelo menos em uma abordagem filosófico-jurídica, ao nos depararmos com os desafios político-jurídicos da contemporaneidade das relações internacionais, uma vez que sejam criadas alguma condições para a sua implementação.
Carvalho, Bossolani Iderpaulo. "Cosmopolitan Greetings: Mixed-Form inter-American Judicial Review and the Latin American Path to Global Constitutionalism." Doctoral thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18452/22054.
Full textIn recent decades, a new human rights enforcement context has emerged in Latin America. The organizational evolution of the Inter-American System for Human Rights Protection (IAS), the adoption of new constitutions by national legislatures, and the adoption of innovative constitutional interpretations by the most authoritative courts in the region have led to the emergence of Latin American cosmopolitan constitutionalism. Within this new context, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR) has started practicing the judicial review of domestic laws, i.e., on several occasions, it has ordered national authorities to invalidate domestic laws due to their incompatibility with the American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR). By reviewing domestic laws, the IACtHR has placed itself in the middle of a dialogue between legislatures and courts that was long seen as an exclusively domestic conversation within Latin American constitutionalism. This strong form of international jurisprudence has made the normative questions relating to judicial review much more complex to address. Given the increasing conflicts between domestic and inter-American human rights authorities, this study aims to find the most legitimate and effective approach to the practice of inter-American judicial review. In line with this, and drawing on the debate about domestic judicial review, it first assesses the reasons behind the practice of strong international judicial review. In order to offer a better form of inter-institutional interaction within the IAS, this study later addresses theories that have sought to weaken the practice of inter-American judicial review based on the principle of subsidiarity. These theories have often advocated for the adoption of the national margin of appreciation based on the European experience with this concept of deference to national authorities. Finally, this study advocates for a context-based theory of inter-American judicial review and tries to reconcile the national margin of appreciation with Latin American cosmopolitan constitutionalism.
Ferreira, Carlos Enrique Ruiz. "Direitos Humanos e soberania: o projeto universal-cosmopolita versus o estado emuralhado nacional." Universidade de São Paulo, 2009. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8131/tde-09122009-105835/.
Full textThis thesis argues from the central hypothesis that there is an essential antinomy in the contemporary Western political thought between human rights and Sovereignty. This antagonism can be observed in two fields (although interconnected): in the theorethical field itself, in which we arrive at a universal-cosmopolitan project antagonistic to the State-enclosed-national terrritory; and in the field of international law, where we encounter this paradox in some of the international post-Second World War legal instruments. At the end of the research, the hypothesis was confirmed, thus revealing the existence of a double theoretical-practical matrix in the political thought (two philosophies) of the contemporary world. On the one hand, human rights are taken to the very end (in its logical extreme), correlate and defend a world without borders, of the kosmopolites (world citizen). On the other hand, Sovereignty, equally taken in this logical extreme, refers back to territories frontiers, to the closed territories, and its exclusive jurisdiction. Seen from this point of view, Sovereignty ties itself to the logic of the wall, the distinction and polarity of I and the other, as the national-citizen versus the foreigner.
Nour, Sckell Soraya. "La justice cosmopolite : histoire des principes et enjeux contemporains." Thesis, Paris 10, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012PA100194/document.
Full textCosmopolitan justice presupposes justice in the order of a State as well as international justice, but differs from these two forms in that it questions the just and unjust concerning human beings as such and as a unique individual, beyond one’s status as a resident, national or citizen of a State, and also takes into account future generations and the environment. Being cosmopolitan has an individual and collective dimension related to the construction of the self (a cosmopolitan self), to one’s way of thinking and living in its everyday dimension (action from a cosmopolitan standpoint) and a reflection on what is just and unjust cosmopolitanism, the emergence of social groups that require cosmopolitanism and the normativity of national, international and supranational institutions that want to achieve it. Thus, the notion of cosmopolitan justice proves to be a common object in the field of philosophy, political science, sociology, cultural studies, social psychology and law. This thesis first analyzes the challenges of cosmopolitan justice as they were formulated in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries by Hobbes, Kant, Hegel and Alexander von Humboldt, comparing their ideas with contemporary debates (Part I). It then analyzes new issues regarding cosmopolitan justice that emerged in the twentieth century with Freud, Kelsen, Critical Theory and Bourdieu (Part II). Finally, an analysis is offered on fundamental contemporary issues of cosmopolitan justice, such as human rights, humanitarian law, the rights of minorities and global public space (Part III)
Mello, Rafaela da Cruz. "Princípio da jurisdição universal: a deslocalização judiciária entre o dever ser cosmopolita e a realidade da cosmopolitização." Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 2017. http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/12531.
Full textO processo de internacionalização dos direitos humanos foi um dos responsáveis por tornar os indivíduos em sujeitos de direito internacional e por motivar o desenvolvimento do princípio da humanidade. Nesse contexto, ideais cosmopolitas, inspirados nas reflexões filosóficas de Immanuel Kant, a partir de meados do século passado, passaram a despontar com o intuito de fornecer bases para a interpretação de determinados fenômenos. No campo jurídico, a observação a partir de preceitos do cosmopolitismo acaba por fornecer importantes elementos para a compreensão dos direitos humanos e da necessidade de combate à impunidade em relação àqueles que cometem violações globais a tais direitos por meio de genocídios, crimes de guerra e crimes contra a humanidade. Em relação a esses tipos penais, a internacionalização fomentou o chamado princípio da jurisdição universal. Segundo tal princípio, qualquer Estado é capaz de julgar crimes ocorridos contra os direitos humanos, mesmo que não haja vinculação territorial dos fatos ao seu território ou vínculo de nacionalidade entre vítimas e/ou réus e o Estado julgador. Está-se diante da denominada deslocalização judiciária, em que elementos como territorialidade e nacionalidade são colocados em xeque por força da necessidade de proteção aos direitos humanos. A utilização desse princípio, por gerar rupturas com elementos da compreensão moderna de direito, de jurisdição e de processo, gera questionamentos de ordem prática, no campo da chamada cosmopolitização da justiça. Diante desse cenário, os problemas de pesquisa que norteiam este trabalho são: Em que medida o processo de internacionalização dos direitos humanos estabelece um dever de exercício de jurisdição universal por parte dos Estados? Ao observar os limites do real, quais são os entraves para um efetivo exercício da jurisdição universal em sua forma absoluta? O objetivo geral da pesquisa foi o de observar o princípio da jurisdição universal sobre a ótica dicotômica do dever ser cosmopolita, de inspiração nas reflexões filosóficas kantianas e de autores que utilizam Kant como sua base teórica e do ser da cosmopolitização, conceito desenvolvido no plano da sociologia por Ulrich Beck e que demonstra que a realidade se afasta das percepções de um cosmopolitismo filosófico e se aproxima da ideia de que a sociedade se tornou cosmopolita em razão da transnacionalização de riscos globais. Utilizou-se o método de abordagem dialético e os métodos de procedimento comparativo e tipológico. Concluiu-se que ancorada filosoficamente em premissas do cosmopolitismo e, juridicamente nas normas do jus cogens, a jurisdição universal, em sua forma absoluta, é vista como um dever ser capaz de romper com a impunidade e reparar violações de direitos humanos. No entanto, a realidade do ser afasta-se das pretensões universalistas e se aproxima do particularismo das práticas, de modo que a presença de entraves jurídicos e políticos ao exercício da jurisdição universal reduzem de modo drástico o seu espectro de aplicação. De dever de punir, por meio da aplicação da jurisdição universal absoluta, os Estados passaram a somente poder punir se houver a assunção de algumas condições, em geral estipuladas pelas respectivas legislações internas.
Bassegio, Luana Fischer. "Direitos humanos e justiça internacional : o cosmopolitismo como uma alternativa ao direito dos povos." reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/10183/149558.
Full textHuman rights and international justice are issues that span multiple categories of discussion. Both are equally important and none of them are unable to reach the other by itself. This study aims to present the main contemporary political theories that address this topic, in search of the best answer to the question-problem: which proposed political philosophy evenly fits the valuation of individual rights and argues as international factors affect the domestic society? We review the literature from the work A Theory of Justice by John Rawls, point out how the debate has expanded to the international level and what the criticisms that have been made throughout this process. We demonstrate how international relations affect the domestic policy of developing societies and, thus, should not only be considered when we think about individual rights, but also should become essential and an indispensable part of a theory of justice. At last, we conclude that the consistent and accurately cosmopolitan proposal presents itself as the best alternative in favor of individual rights, and the Global Resources Tax ensures the needed regularity for the discussion of international justice.
Mancilla, Maria Alejandra. "A cosmopolitan right of necessity." Phd thesis, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/149875.
Full textHutchinson, Samuel William. "Refugee Right from a Kantian Perspective." Thesis, 2021. https://hdl.handle.net/2440/132853.
Full textThesis (MPhil) -- University of Adelaide, School of Humanities, 2021
Pace, Cristina Luísa. "Cosmopolitan EU? Minority Rights and the Management of Cultural Diversity." Doctoral thesis, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/10362/52372.
Full textKocsis, MICHAEL. "Human Rights and Self-Government in the Age of Cosmopolitan Interventionism." Thesis, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/1974/8316.
Full textThesis (Ph.D, Philosophy) -- Queen's University, 2013-09-25 12:11:55.056
Nursoo, Ida. "In the Waiting Room of Humanity: Rupturing Cosmopolitan Ethics, Revisiting Kant, Refracting (In)Human Rights." Phd thesis, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1885/126287.
Full textRocksborough-Smith, Ian Maxwell. "Contentious Cosmopolitans: Black Public History and Civil Rights in Cold War Chicago, 1942-1972." Thesis, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/1807/65735.
Full textFernandes, Gabriel Lima. "Do Deslocamento Forçado ao Refúgio: Matéria de Jurisdição Soberana do Estado ou Responsabilidade Internacional Compartilhada? Por uma Cidadania Cosmopolita em Tempos de Internacionalização do Direito Constitucional e de Constitucionalização do Direito Internacional." Master's thesis, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10316/97159.
Full textO deslocamento forçado de pessoas e os infortúnios que o envolvem são um dos mais graves problemas da contemporaneidade com o qual a Comunidade Internacional precisa lidar. O Direito Internacional dos Refugiados, cujas ferramentas de proteção se caracterizam como as mais desenvolvidas normativamente e mais aceitas pelos integrantes daquela Comunidade, se restringe a salvaguardar os direitos de apenas uma das categorias de deslocados forçados, qual seja, dos Refugiados, tal como definidos pela Convenção Relativa ao Estatuto dos Refugiados de 1951 e pelo seu Protocolo de 1967. Assim, deixa de fora do seu âmbito protetivo todas as demais categorias, tais como, os deslocados internos, os deslocados por deterioração das condições ambientais e os deslocados por violações negativas de Direitos Humanos, uma vez que aqueles documentos, por um lado, privilegiam a tutela dos direitos civis e políticos em detrimento dos direitos econômicos, sociais e culturais e dos direitos transindividuais e difusos e, por outro, estabelecem a extraterritorialidade como requisito indispensável à concessão do seu respectivo Estatuto. Questiona-se, pois, se, em tempos de Internacionalização do Direito Internacional e de Constitucionalização do Direito Internacional, e diante do compromisso ético da Comunidade Internacional pela garantia universal dos Direitos Humanos e pela concretização da dignidade humana, bem como ante a urgência de se resolver a problemática do deslocamento forçado, deve a lógica de proteção dos refugiados permanecer demasiadamente restritiva ou se deve ser reformada, a fim de abranger com o seu manto protetivo as demais pessoas forçadamente deslocadas, a contribuir, dessa forma, com a solução, ou, ao menos, com o abrandamento, dessa problemática. Cuida-se, ademais, de buscar um remédio, pautado na concepção de que a Comunidade Internacional possui uma responsabilidade compartilhada para com a problemática do deslocamento forçado, para um dos infortúnios mais nocivos à efetiva proteção das pessoas forçadamente deslocadas que é a sua injusta distribuição e, consequentemente, dos ônus inerentes ao seu acolhimento, entre os países do mundo.
The forced displacement of people and the misfortunes surrounding it are one of the most serious contemporary problems that the International Community needs to deal with. International Refugee Law, which protection tools are the most normatively developed and most accepted by members of that Community, is restricted to safeguarding the rights of only one of the categories of forced displaced persons, namely, Refugees, as defined by Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees of 1951 and its 1967 Protocol. This leaves out of their protective scope all other categories, such as internally displaced persons, displaced by deteriorating environmental conditions and displaced by negative violations of Human Rights, once those documents, by one perspective, privilege the protection of civil and political rights in detriment of economic, social, cultural rights and transindividual and diffuse rights and, on the other hand, establish extraterritoriality as an indispensable requirement for the concession of its respective Statute. It is therefore questioned whether, in times of Internationalization of International Law and Constitutionalization of International Law, and in view of the ethical commitment of the International Community for the universal guarantee of Human Rights and for the realization of human dignity, also, moved by the urgency to resolve the problematic of forced displacement, should the logic of refugee protection remain too restrictive or should it be reformed in order to cover with its protective scope the other forcibly displaced persons, thus contributing to the solution, or at least , with the slowdown, of this problem. Furthermore, care is taken to seek a remedy based on the conception that the International Community has a shared responsibility for the problem of forced displacement, for one of the most harmful misfortunes to the effective protection of forced displaced persons, which is their unjust distribution and, consequently, of the inherent burden of receiving it, between the countries of the world.