Academic literature on the topic 'Copyright Amendment (Moral Rights) Act'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Copyright Amendment (Moral Rights) Act.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Copyright Amendment (Moral Rights) Act"
Shaffer, Roberta I. "The Artist's Case for Droit Moral and Droit de Suite Continues." International Journal of Legal Information 15, no. 1-2 (April 1987): 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0731126500020412.
Full textPutranti, Deslaely. "Copyright Protection in Indonesia: Study of Amendment of Act Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright." Melayunesia Law 2, no. 1 (July 10, 2018): 25. http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/ml.v2i1.5401.
Full textYu, Peter K. "Moral Rights 2.0." 2013 Fall Intellectual Property Symposium Articles 1, no. 4 (March 2014): 873–900. http://dx.doi.org/10.37419/lr.v1.i4.3.
Full textDrobiazko, Volodymyr. "Protection of the rights of performers in accordance with German law." Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property, no. 4 (October 19, 2022): 24–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.33731/42022.265846.
Full textClark, Charles. "The UK Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988: moral rights." Learned Publishing 3, no. 2 (January 1, 1990): 92–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/leap/30031.
Full textOlubiyi, Ifeoluwa A., and Desmond O. Oriakhogba. "Implications of the Nigerian Broadcasting Code on Broadcast Copyright and Competition." GRUR International 70, no. 7 (January 4, 2021): 644–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikaa194.
Full textCantatore, Francina, and Jane Johnston. "Moral Rights: Exploring the Myths, Meanings and Misunderstandings in Australian Copyright Law." Deakin Law Review 21, no. 1 (February 23, 2018): 71. http://dx.doi.org/10.21153/dlr2016vol21no1art727.
Full textMujuzi, Jamil Ddamulira. "Prosecuting and punishing copyright infringements in South Africa: A comment on the Copyright Amendment Bill, B13B-2017." South African Journal of Criminal Justice 33, no. 3 (2020): 731–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.47348/sacj/v33/i3a11.
Full textJudge, Elizabeth F., and Saleh Al-Sharieh. "Join the Club: The Implications of the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement's Enforcement Measures for Canadian Copyright Law." Alberta Law Review 49, no. 3 (March 1, 2012): 677. http://dx.doi.org/10.29173/alr113.
Full textWood, Nicholas Stuart. "Protecting Creativity: Why Moral Rights Should be Extended to Sound Recordings under New Zealand Copyright Law." Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 32, no. 1 (March 5, 2001): 163. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v32i1.5899.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Copyright Amendment (Moral Rights) Act"
Banks, Catherine, and n/a. "Lost in Translation: A History of Moral Rights in Australian Law." Griffith University. Griffith Law School, 2005. http://www4.gu.edu.au:8080/adt-root/public/adt-QGU20061006.114720.
Full textBanks, Catherine. "Lost in Translation: A History of Moral Rights in Australian Law." Thesis, Griffith University, 2005. http://hdl.handle.net/10072/365849.
Full textThesis (PhD Doctorate)
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Griffith Law School
Full Text
Books on the topic "Copyright Amendment (Moral Rights) Act"
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks. Visual Artists Rights Amendment of 1986: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, second session, on S. 2796 ... New York, NY, November 18, 1986. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1987.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks. Visual Artists Rights Amendment of 1986: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, second session, on S. 2796 ... New York, NY, November 18, 1986. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1987.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks. Visual Artists Rights Amendment of 1986: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-ninth Congress, second session, on S. 2796 ... New York, NY, November 18, 1986. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1987.
Find full textLal, Nathuni. Lal's commentary on the Copyright Act, 1957 (Act No. 14 of 1957): With the Copyright (Amendment) Act, 2012 (Act no. 27 of 2012), The Copyrights rules, 2013 & Neighbouring Rights, also International Copyrighr Order, 1999. 5th ed. New Delhi: Delhi Law House, 2013.
Find full textUnited, States Congress House Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts Intellectual Property and the Administration of Justice. Visual Artists Rights Act of 1989: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Administration of Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundred First Congress, first session, on H.R. 2690 ... October 18, 1989. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1990.
Find full textUnited States. Congress. Senate. Committee on the Judiciary. Subcommittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks. Visual Artists Rights Act of 1987: Hearing before the Subcomittee on Patents, Copyrights, and Trademarks of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundredth Congress, first session, on S. 1619 ... December 3, 1987. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1988.
Find full textUnited, States Congress House Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Courts Civil Liberties and the Administration of Justice. Visual Artists Rights Act of 1987: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Courts, Civil Liberties, and the Administration of Justice of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, second session on H.R. 3221 ... June 9, 1988. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1989.
Find full textLal, Nathuni. Lal's commentary on the Copyright Act, 1957 (Act 14 of 1957): With the Copyright Rules, 1958 & neighbouring rights, also International Copyright Order, 1999 alongwith Patent (Amendment) Rules, 2006, the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (Procedure) Rules, 2003, Trade Mark Rules, 2002 together with law relating to ownership of copyright and the rights of the owners, international copyright infringement of copyright, registration of copyrights, making of sound recording's, importation of infringing copies with latest case laws. 4th ed. Delhi: Delhi Law House, 2006.
Find full textSnow, Ned. Intellectual Property and Immorality. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197614402.001.0001.
Full textMarcus, Smith, and Leslie Nico. Part III Transfers in Particular Contexts, 20 Transfer of Intellectual Property. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198748434.003.0020.
Full textBook chapters on the topic "Copyright Amendment (Moral Rights) Act"
Bently, L., B. Sherman, D. Gangjee, and P. Johnson. "10. Moral rights." In Intellectual Property Law. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198769958.003.0010.
Full textRicketson, Sam, and Jane C. Ginsburg. "The Rights Protected by the Convention: General Introduction; Moral Rights (Article 6bis)." In International Copyright and Neighbouring Rights, 577–614. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198801986.003.0010.
Full textKarapapa, Stavroula, and Luke McDonagh. "6. Moral rights." In Intellectual Property Law, 131–48. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198747697.003.0006.
Full textBently, L., B. Sherman, D. Gangjee, and P. Johnson. "10. Moral Rights." In Intellectual Property Law, 303–22. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198869917.003.0010.
Full textBate, Stephen, and Gervase de Wilde. "Copyright, Moral Rights, and the Right to One’s Image." In Tugendhat and Christie: The Law of Privacy and The Media. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199685745.003.0012.
Full textDivan, Shyam, and Armin Rosencranz. "Constitutional Provisions." In Environmental Law and Policy in India, 46—C3.N107. 3rd ed. Oxford University PressOxford, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192865458.003.0003.
Full textSood, Ekta, and Vibhuti Nakta. "Cybersquatting." In Handbook of Research on Cyber Law, Data Protection, and Privacy, 120–36. IGI Global, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-8641-9.ch008.
Full text"construing the Berne Convention to say that all that was required was a positive right to claim authorship which the author may exercise as he wishes. Normally this will be by placing his name on copies of the work. The Green Paper noted that s 43 of the 1956 Act provided a useful remedy where the plaintiff is not a professional writer and could not therefore recover damages for loss of goodwill in a passing off action; the provision survives as s 84 of the 1988 Act. The Berne Convention also contains some latitude as to the right of integrity since Article 6 bis requires a right to object in cases only where actions in relation to an author’s work would be prejudicial to his honour or reputation. The government agreed with Whitford that exceptions such as the permitting of reasonable modifications (as in the Netherlands Copyright Act) should be made and that they would be in accordance with the Berne Convention. The Green Paper therefore proposed that the legislation should provide that no change should be made in any literary, dramatic, musical, artistic or cinematographic work without the author’s consent, with the exception of changes to which the author could not in good faith refuse consent. The Act embraces this principle by implication, not expressly, as it adopts the wording of the Berne Convention rather than that of the Green Paper. The Green Paper went on to propose that the rights would be exerciseable only by the author or, after his death, by his personal representative. Contravention of the rights would be actionable as a breach of statutory duty. The rights would not be assignable. However, the author would be permitted to waive his moral rights and such waiver would be binding on his successors in title. The moral rights would exist for the same period as economic rights. The White Paper promised legislation along the lines foreshadowed in the Green Paper, noting that while Whitford had doubted whether UK law had complied with the Brussels text of the Berne Convention, there was no doubt that amendment of the law was necessary to comply with the Paris text. Chapter 4 of the Act sets out the new rights. The rights to be protected are the minimum required to be protected by Berne – paternity and integrity. There is no equivalent to the French droit de divulgation (the right to control circulation of a work prior to its being completed for publication), the droit d’accès (mainly of artists to their paintings after sale), the droit de repentir (the right of withdrawal after publication, subject in German law to the payment of compensation to the publisher, of a work of which its author no longer approves). Nor is there a right to reacquire a work of which the author has disposed – such as Graham Sutherland might have found useful in the case of his portrait of Churchill – or a right of publication. The possibility of." In Sourcebook on Intellectual Property Law, 488. Routledge-Cavendish, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781843142928-70.
Full text