Contents
Academic literature on the topic 'Cooperazione in reato colposo'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Cooperazione in reato colposo.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Cooperazione in reato colposo"
Pascucci, Paolo. "Sicurezza sul lavoro e cooperazione del lavoratore." GIORNALE DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DI RELAZIONI INDUSTRIALI, no. 171 (December 2021): 421–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/gdl2021-171003.
Full text"Diritto italiano. Minori." DIRITTO, IMMIGRAZIONE E CITTADINANZA, no. 3 (November 2010): 204–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/diri2010-003016.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Cooperazione in reato colposo"
Borghi, M. "IL CONCORSO COLPOSO NEL REATO COLPOSO E NEL REATO DOLOSO.TEORIA E PRASSI IN ITALIA E IN GERMANIA." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano, 2014. http://hdl.handle.net/2434/234162.
Full textThis work focuses on the negligent aiding and abetting someone else’s negligent or intentional crime in Italian and German criminal law. The first part provides an analysis of the scholarship and the case law developed under the Zanardelli Code, on the incompatibility between cooperation in a crime and negligence. Art. 113 of that Code, indeed, aiming at filling possible gaps of impunity, introduced the “cooperation in negligent crime”. In particular, this analysis attempts to identify the distinguishing feature of negligent cooperation, in contrast with the “simultaneous presence of independent causes due to negligence”, regulated by art. 41 of the penal code: such element consists in the “awareness of cooperating with other persons”. Not only does this rule display a regulatory function, but it also performs an incriminating function for various types of crimes:. It’s then pointed out that it’s also possible, on the basis of art. 110 p.c., to construct a crime of negligent aiding and abetting someone’s negligent misdemeanors. As to the controversial hypothesis of the negligent aiding and abetting someone’s intentional crime, the so called dogma of unity of abettors’ responsibility can be overcome by other arguments, suggesting that this form of cooperation, is admissible in the light of the law in force. The second part of the work is concerned with German law. recently some German scholars supported the configurability of a “negligent cooperation in committing a crime (fahrlässige Mittäterschaft)” according to § 25, Abs. 2, StGB. There are no rules that prevent this solution. moreover, the Italian debate shows that the theory that limits persons’ cooperation in committing a crime only to intentional crimes can be overcome. Nevertheless, in the case of fahrlässige Mittäterschaft, the proof that the single contribution caused the event should be considered necessary. The remaining chapter analyzes the main developments of the German debate about negligent cooperation in an intentional crime, from the oldest doctrine of the so called prohibition of recourse (Regressverbot) to the current doctrine of the objective ascription of the event. According to the more persuasive opinion, it is possible to construct a responsibility of the first negligent abetter (although in his own personal capacity), if he aids the second one’s recognizable inclination to crime.
MARIOTTI, MARCO. ""Responsabilità colposa 'per fatto altrui"." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/2434/630694.
Full textThis thesis provides a critical analysis of the circumstances in which an agent, who performs a negligent act, is held criminally liable for damage which was however not directly caused by his or her negligent act, but rather was caused by the act of another (with the view of causing damage either to another or to itself). This form of criminal liability “in relation to the conduct of another”, far from being exceptional, is common in many cases of failure to control or failure to prevent the commission of criminal offences by others, particularly in the context of team-working, and even more so within complex organisations having large corporate structures. The thesis examines the structural problems with this form of criminal liability. It identifies “relational elements”, the elements which enable the creation of a link between the responsibility of the agent whose conduct was the furthest to the damage, and the conduct of those having directly caused the damage. These relational elements impact both the basis on which liability attaches to the negligent agent, and the extent to which this liability exists. This analysis will cover both elements of a criminal offence, that is both the actus reus and the mens rea, with the aim of evaluating whether the legal framework at its current state effectively deals with “relational elements” as grounds for attaching liability, or whether too many uncertainties subsist when making this link– in both theoretical and practical terms– which prevent the clear and effective allocation of criminal liability among the different agents involved. First of all, with regards to the actus reus, this paper addresses the issue of concurring and intervening causes which may break the chain of causality between the agent’s action and the consequence of the actus reus, reaffirming the “sine qua non” paradigm. Furthermore, the research assesses the relevance in this context of the influence which one agent’s behaviour can have on the decisions subsequently taken by others, (known as a “psychological cause” of an action). The paper also critically analyses different theories regarding the basis of guarantees, whereby the guarantor’s liability only exists in relation to the act of another. On this point, a comparative analysis has highlighted how German case law has developed in such a way as to allow guarantees to arise from a factual basis, as opposed to solely through contract or other legally binding instruments, thus running the risk of violating the rule of law. Secondly, with regard to the mens rea element of an offence, the research examines three different examples of “relational elements”, by which another’s conduct needs to be taken into consideration, therefore entering into the mens rea element: (i) precautionary rules which can require the agent to observe another subject’s behaviour and to act accordingly; (ii) the expectation that other subjects involved will act lawfully, which needs to be accurately evaluated in order not to leave any gaps in the prevention of crime; (iii) the complex issue of foreseeability and avoidability of the consequences of one’s conduct, becomes even more intricate with the interposition of another’s conduct. Lastly, the paper will focus on joint enterprise in negligence cases. Having first of all stressed the structural uncertainties and the limited prosecutorial use of the concept of joint enterprise in the context of negligence offences, the thesis argues that through the different “relational elements” present in an offence, each agent’s liability can be independently determined by taking into account the interactions with others. It is worth noting that in the case where the mens rea element of an offence requires intentional participation to another’s negligent behaviour, these uncertainties appear to be even greater. In conclusion, the paper will point out that the liability of guarantors is independent from their participation in the joint criminal enterprise, as this type of liability arises from the guarantee itself.
RIBOLI, ORESTE. "La prevenzione del danno da prodotto alimentare: aporie del reato colposo d'evento e modelli di tutela anticipata." Doctoral thesis, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10280/988.
Full textThis academic research wanted to investigate crucial issues involving, on one hand, the most suitable regulatory instruments to foster an effective prevention against food risk and, on the other hand, the opportunities that criminal law has to be effective in leading more and more complex social processes and legittimate. In order to support this statement, firstly, we focused our attention on the most controversial points of the criminal law, pointing out the essential features of the intricate relationship between traditional criminal law and risikogesellschaft; secondly, we tested the opportunity for a penal intervention that could combine, on one hand, social demands for security and, on the other hand, the responsibilities of a modern criminal law. Adopting first a de jure condito perspective and then a de jure condendo approach, we tried to critically assess the most recent measures of penal intervention introduced by the legislator and the main results produced lately by the forensic science on the chance to set new outlines of potential risk that – created according to the features of the empiric phenomenology of reference – still respect the constitutional criteria.
FIORELLI, ALESSANDRA. "ATTIVITA' DI PROTEZIONE CIVILE E RESPONSABILITA' PENALE." Doctoral thesis, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 2015. http://hdl.handle.net/10280/6898.
Full textThe interest in realizing an in-depth analysis of the criminal responsibilities related to the failure of the activities of civil defence arises from the increase in criminal proceedings against workers of the Civil Defence. Given the phenomenon of versatility of the elements of crime risen from the social need for safety, the main purpose of the investigation is the identification of the conditions of statement of responsibility. The investigation is divided in two thematic areas intended to remodel the legislation of Civil Defence and describe the criteria of statement of responsibility. As a joining link, the risk, cross element of the whole analysis, is both the subject of the activities of civil defence and a factor of distorsion of the elements of crime and expression of the necessity to distinguish the perspectival view of the management of risk from that of judgement on the failure of previsional activity. The proposed solutions, placed in the legal reality of the criminal procedure of Aquila earthquake, have a perfect balance between the opposite values of safety and freedom, in order to grant a legal protection which cannot be excluded and must be placed within the borders of the guarantees of the criminal procedure.
DE, LUCA CARLOTTA. "L'ORDINE EUROPEO D'INDAGINE PENALE: DISCIPLINA NORMATIVA E PRIME ESPERIENZE APPLICATIVE." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Milano, 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/2434/919437.
Full textThe European criminal investigation order, introduced by Directive 2014/41/EU, is an instrument of judicial cooperation in the field of evidence, which has become necessary, given the growing transnational dimension of crime as a result of the sublimation of geographical boundaries in the European Union's Area of Freedom, Security and Justice. The supranational directive, implemented by Italian Legislative Decree no. 108 of 2017, has given rise to a construct of hybrid nature, inspired by the principle of mutual recognition, which maintains, at the same time, certain features typical of traditional mutual legal assistance, in an attempt to combine investigative efficiency and protection of fundamental guarantees. In an underlying backdrop still characterized by the absence of harmonization of national procedural and evidentiary rules, the mechanism for adducing evidence in a foreign country revolves around the principle of proportionality, which in turn takes shape in the context of a balancing judgement - to be conducted in the actual case and taking into consideration the specificities of such case - between the needs related to the detection of crime and the sacrifices imposed on the rights of the persons involved, for various reasons, in the procedures aimed at issuing and executing the relevant order. This doctoral thesis intends to provide a comprehensive analysis of the European Investigation Order, beginning with its legal framework, for the purposes of highlighting the main problems that have emerged in its early-stage enforcement and of identifying solutions capable of shorten the gap between theory and practice. To this end, a large space is firstly dedicated to the analysis of the early case-law rendered by the Court of Justice and by the Italian Court of Cassation on this theme, which reveals the overall tendency to prefer purposes of investigatory efficiency to the detriment of defense rights; secondly, this thesis critically evaluates some practical cases selected at the Public Prosecutor's Office of Milan and Monza.
Books on the topic "Cooperazione in reato colposo"
Benedetto, Paola Severino Di. La cooperazione nel delitto colposo. Milano: A. Giuffrè, 1988.
Find full textAldrovandi, Paolo. Concorso nel reato colposo e diritto penale dell'impresa. Milano: Giuffrè, 1999.
Find full textMantovani, Marco. Il principio di affidamento nella teoria del reato colposo. Milano: A. Giuffrè, 1997.
Find full text