Academic literature on the topic 'Convenzioni urbanistiche'

Milan was the number one Italian property market in the 1950s and 1960s. Private sector players built a very large number of new homes, most of which to house the emerging middle classes drawn to this commercial, financial and management centre, the regional capital of Lombardy. This new residential landscape was created by means of a variety of different processes and means. The paper investigates them by reconstructing a few case histories of residential projects involving agreements entered into by the City government with private sector players to implement the 1953 Master Plan. An attempt is made to highlight the main procedures employed to insert the new developments within the existing city and the relations maintained by the new developments with the main themes of post-war urban planning in Milan.

L'occupazione napoleonica di Milano portň con sé la demolizione dei baluardi del castello, una nuova piazza d'armi, un piano rivoluzionario quanto idealistico (quello dell'Antolini). Con la nuova concezione di guerra, di difesa e di offesa le mura persero la loro principale funzione e rimasero in auge come confine tributario, le porte divennero nuovi capisaldi monumentali o scomodo intralcio alla circolazione, le truppe trovarono spazi e ospitalitŕ in un gran numero di conventi del centro espropriati al tempo della dominazione austriaca. Questo stato di cose perdurň per buona parte dell'Ottocento, fino a quando le mutate condizioni politiche e socio-economiche, unitamente ad una rapida crescita demografica, videro la cittŕ scavalcare le sue mura, e porre il problema della regolazione della crescita attraverso nuovi strumenti urbanistici, mentre una spregiudicata imprenditoria del denaro avviava enormi speculazioni immobiliari sulle aree del demanio militare, in particolare sulla piazza d'armi napoleonica. S'innescarono a catena questioni paradigmatiche: la costruzione del nuovo Quartiere delle Milizie, lo spostamento reiterato della nuova piazza d'armi, la stipula di convenzioni fra Comune e demanio per la permuta di aree e caserme, la demolizione di Porte, Pusterle e delle mura spagnole. Un processo che ha generato contraddizioni che si consegnano ancora irrisolte alla Milano del Piano di Governo del Territorio (PGT).

Is there a possibility talking about the environment by telling stories? Starting from the pretext of a planning exercise promoted by the Authority of Po River Basin, for the “maintenance” of mountain and hill territories of the basin; the research inquires the cogency and effectiveness of planning instruments facing to environmental changes, often triggered to solve emergencies, that affecting the socio-ecological regimes. It thus seeks to investigate, how institutions, in particular weak institutions (the IT Basin Authority and the IT Mountain Communities), coping with the unpredictability of accidental events, overwhelming (unknowingly) not only “instrumental” deficits (implementation and misfit), but also operative uncertainty and cultural productions equally unexpected. The problems, related to ecosystems and resources management or climate change, soil conservation, and the cooperative action global-local (and many others), are coming out with prominence on the political agendas as well as on technical one; moreover their approach is often independently, their approach is often, independently, by sector and / or hierarchically, than to socio-ecological regimes, that allow and provide a different “narrative” of the problems and weave unusual web. If the institutional challenge related to environmental policies is facing the cross-cutting approaches, it may not take into account the relevance of no-institutional agents, building networks and sharing knowledge, not only “expert” one. Therefore the shift towards this complexity of relationships, between different kinds of knowledge and different actions, not only institutional or technical, is the subject of inquiring, testing the settlement of an unprecedented political (environment) space. So, methodologically, it is alternating between “analysis” and “narrative” approach. Analysis, focusing on the use of tools to solve the so called environment crisis (MANUMONT Project, promoted by the Authority of Po Basin and the Alpine Convention as an example of Regional Environmental Governance); on the other side, Narration rised the prominence of "stylized facts" (no methods), stories (no big numbers), not merely interpretive, but explanatory emergence of smart players (who have staged unusual outcome for the creation of new spaces). Relating to the modernization and its different epistemological, and investigating them qith misty eyes is perhaps unprecedented fact, to build a new relationship between modernization and the environment. Is there a possibility to solve the relationship between modernization and environmental crisis? This work try to come out a different perspective, raising this relationship in tension and turning the terms of the relationship in: modernization crisis - environment. Three different epistemological modernizations are looking deeply, matching three different approaches to environmental problems: the instrumental one (the PdM of ADB Po), the reflective and self-consciousness one with institutional uncertainties following, and finally the discoursive comes from the overlapping stories and different scales (CA and eco-villages). A tension between speeches, which sees new political subjectivity for the environmental space, getting onto the pragmatic regimes its most convincing valiance. Therefore, challenges, faced by environmental - crisis - modernization, mustn't be address solving the environmental crisis, but considering the crisis, not something to contain or reduce, rather than be questioned.

Letizia Gorgo¹, Gloria Riggi² ¹Dipartimento di Architettura e progetto. Dottorato in Architettura e costruzione, Sapienza, Università di Roma, Via Gramsci, 53. 00197 Roma ² Dipartimento di Architettura e progetto. Dottorato in Architettura e costruzione, Sapienza, Università di Roma, Via Gramsci, 53. 00197 Roma E-mail: letiziagorgo@hotmail.it, gloriariggi@libero.it, Keywords : abandoned villages, urban morphology, scattered hotel, existing fabric, revitalization strategies Conference topics and scale: City transformations In Italy today, one can count more than 6000 villages that have been abandoned(deserted) for a variety of causes. This negletc state produces a serious problem related to a wider phenomenon of abandonment of entire portions of italian territories. Realities that differ form the city because of their morphology: Does urban shape represent an urban limit? or is it an alternative testimony to the city? Research purpose is to understand how relationship, between these cases and the territory, works; in particular during the absence of the main component: the human one. The case study Santo Stefano di Sessanio, an ancient village in the center of Italy, inhabited until 90's, shows how the examination of urban shape represents the potentiality of his own revitalization. By relating his historical identity to the scattered hotel projectual approach, it contributes to combine conservation, valorization and sustainability of the existing building fabric, in order to claim the authenticity of these villages declaring their own autonomy and dimension to major urban centers polarization. In this example transformation is meant as conscious project that grow up from the built reality not from the project itself, transformation as knowledge of urban facts, tool to approach to the structure of this reality. References Rossi A., (1966 ) ‘L’architettura della città’, Quodlibet, Macerata Muratori S., (1967) ‘Civiltà e territorio’, Centro studi di storia e urbanistica, Roma Cartei, G. F., (2007) ‘Convenzione europea del paesaggio e governo del territorio’, Il Mulino, Bologna Caravaggi L., (2014) ‘La montagna resiliente’, Quodlibet, Macerata, Strappa, G., Carlotti, P., Camiz, A., (2016) ‘Urban Morphology and Historical Fabrics’, Gangemi Editore, Rome

Negli ultimi decenni del secolo scorso si è diffusa nel mondo occidentale una nuova coscienza ambientale ed ecologica che, assieme alla rivoluzione tecnologica ed informatica, ha orientato anche la progettazione architettonica ed urbanistica verso una integrazione/ibridazione di elementi naturali, artificiali e tecnologici, con particolare attenzione per gli aspetti della sostenibilità ambientale e del risparmio energetico, alle varie scale di intervento, dagli edifici “intelligenti” alla rete delle smart cities. Ogni giorno assistiamo alla creazione di ambienti sempre più interconnessi, interattivi e interagenti con gli utenti, flessibili e capaci di scambiare informazioni con il mondo esterno. Siamo ormai in grado di monitorare i nostri contesti di vita come mai fino ad ora era stato possibile, raccogliendo e mettendo a sistema una mole di informazioni senza precedenti. Inoltre le nuove tecnologie in molti casi vengono utilizzate per semplificare e facilitare la comunicazione bidirezionale e in tempo reale fra utenti e gestori dei servizi, tra cittadini ed amministrazioni e, più in generale, fra i vari attori del paesaggio, all’interno di una rete di interconnessioni fisiche ed immateriali sempre più fitta e diversificata. Il progetto ecosostenibile di paesaggio richiede, pertanto, un approccio sistemico e uno sguardo ampio che riesca a far incontrare la tutela e la conservazione con la trasformazione e la rigenerazione, inevitabile quanto vitale per i nostri contesti di vita, passando anche attraverso l’uso di strumenti non convenzionali, impiegati diffusamente sia per uno studio del territorio più rispondente alla complessità delle dinamiche reali, sia per la costruzione di un progetto comune di paesaggio. During the last decades of the 20th century a new environmental and ecological awareness has spread in the western world. Together with the technological and digital revolution, it has also directed the architectural and urban design towards an integration/crossbreeding of natural, artificial and technological elements, giving special attention to the aspects of environmental sustainability and of energy saving at the different levels of intervention, from the “intelligent” buildings to the network of the smart cities. Every day we witness to the creation of spaces that are more and more interconnected, user interactive and interagent, flexible and able to exchange information with the outside world. We are now able to supervise our life contexts as never before by collecting and organizing a huge amount of information without precedent. Furthermore, new technologies are used in many cases to simplify and facilitate bidirectional and real-time communication between users and providers, citizens and administrative offices and, in wider terms, among the various actors of the landscape inside a more and more close and diversified network of physical and immaterial interconnections. The eco-sustainable landscape design requires therefore a systemic approach and an overlook in order to permit the match between safeguard and preservation on one hand and transformation and regeneration on the other. This is as inevitable as it is essential for our life contexts, as well as the use of unconventional tools diffusely employed whether for a territorial study in accordance with the complexity of the actual dynamics or for the construction of a collective project of landscape.