Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Contingent valuation / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Contingent valuation.

Journal articles on the topic 'Contingent valuation'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 28 July 2024

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Contingent valuation.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

ARAI, TAKUJI. "AN APPROXIMATE APPROACH TO THE EXPONENTIAL UTILITY INDIFFERENCE VALUATION." International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance 10, no. 03 (May 2007): 475–503. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0219024907004299.

Full text

Abstract:

We propose, in this paper, a new valuation method for contingent claims, which approximates to the exponential utility indifference valuation. In particular, we treat both ask and bid valuations. In the definition of the exponential utility indifference valuation, we require strong integrability for the underlying contingent claim. The new valuation in this paper succeeds in reducing it by using a kind of power functions instead of the exponential function. Furthermore, we shall investigate some basic properties and an asymptotic behavior of the new valuation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Boyle, Kevin J., Michael P. Welsh, Richard C. Bishop, and Robert M. Baumgartner. "Validating Contingent Valuation with Surveys of Experts." Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 24, no. 2 (October 1995): 247–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1068280500008893.

Full text

Abstract:

Contingent-valuation estimates for white-water boating passengers are compared with Likert ratings by river guides. The approach involves asking whether passengers and their guides ordinally rank alternative flows the same. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Contingent Valuation Panel (1993) suggested “one might want to compare its (contingent-valuation's) outcome with that provided by a panel of experts.” River guides constitute a counterfactual panel of “experts.” For commercial trips, optimum flows are 34,000 cfs and 31,000 cfs for passengers and guides, and the comparable figures for private trips are 28,000 cfs and 29,000 cfs. In the NOAA Panel framework, passengers can evaluate the consequences of various river flows and translate this into contingent-valuation responses.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Champ, Patricia A., Nicholas E. Flores, Thomas C. Brown, and James Chivers. "Contingent Valuation and Incentives." Land Economics 78, no. 4 (November 2002): 591–604. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3146855.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

BAMBER, B. R., and G. A. KHOURY. "CONTINGENT VALUATION OF LANDSCAPE." Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport 135, no. 4 (November 1999): 185–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/itran.1999.31996.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Johnson, Bruce K., Michael J. Mondello, and John C. Whitehead. "Contingent Valuation of Sports." Journal of Sports Economics 7, no. 3 (August 2006): 267–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1527002504272943.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Randall, Alan. "Contingent valuation: an introduction." Landscape Research 19, no. 1 (March 1994): 12–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01426399408706413.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Johannesson, Magnus. "The Contingent-valuation Method." Medical Decision Making 13, no. 4 (December 1993): 311–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989x9301300407.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Baron, Jonathan. "Contingent valuation: Flawed logic?" Science 357, no. 6349 (July 27, 2017): 363.1–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aan6594.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Hoehn, John P. "Contingent Valuation in Fisheries Management: The Design of Satisfactory Contingent Valuation Formats." Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 116, no. 3 (May 1987): 412–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1987)116<412:cvifm>2.0.co;2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Mazza, Francesca. "La valutazione economica delle risorse culturali. Un'applicazione della Contingent Valuation." RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione, no. 42 (July 2009): 107–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/riv2008-042007.

Full text

Abstract:

-The case study examines the economic aspects of cultural heritage conservation and deals the valuation of economic value in monetary terms, using the application of the contingent valuation method to the castle of Nicastro (Catanzaro, Italy). For the construction of the hypothetical market and the selection criteria and approach to subjects of the statistic sample, the proposed solutions work with operative adjustments, dictated by the characteristics of the resource in question and in general for all cultural resources. The study has produced reliable answers to questions of willingness to pay, expressing the measure of the different components of the value (use value and existence value) contribute to the composition of the total economic value. The study allowed to verify the possibility of using the contingent valuation as a political tool. The particular question format, which combines ‘double bounded dichotomous choice' and ‘open ended' techniques has allowed us to take a sensitivity analysis, defining the measure of willingness to pay.Key words: evaluation cultural resource, contingent valuation method, willingness to payParole chiave: valutazione, beni culturali, metodo di valutazione contingente, disponibilitŕ a pagare

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Mayer, Adam. "Contingency, cost, and a fracking ban: Extending sociological research with the contingent valuation method." Methodological Innovations 11, no. 2 (May 2018): 205979911879074. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2059799118790741.

Full text

Abstract:

Documenting patterns of environmental concerns has been a core effort of environmental sociology since the founding of the sub-discipline. Environmental economists, on the other hand, are pre-occupied with the valuation of non-market goods like ecosystems services and environmental policy. In this article, we argue that sociologists should cautiously embrace non-market valuation methods, particularly the contingent valuation method. We provide a motivating empirical example by considering the case of support for a fracking ban among residents of Colorado, USA. Our analysis suggests that Colorado residents’ support for a fracking ban is somewhat contingent upon the costs created by said ban. We then conclude by discussing how sociologists might extend research on non-market valuation with sociological insights.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Unachukwu, Ijeoma Blessing, Ojiako, Ndubueze basil, and Ebere Veronica. "An empirical review of the effect of climate change on agriculture: a contingent valuation method." Journal of Management and Science 12, no. 3 (September 30, 2022): 112–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.26524/jms.12.52.

Full text

Abstract:

This study is an empirical review of the effect of climate change on agriculture: a contingent valuation method. The paper relied on content analysis of extant literature. The paper viewed contingency valuation or the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) is an economic, non-market based valuation method especially used to infer individual's preferences for public goods, notably environmental quality and more precisely it is used to place a monetary value on nonmarket goods. Available of the literature investigated suggest that there is a paucity of empirical literature in this area of study. However, findings from the empirical literature showed that climate impact negatively on agricultural production which suggests the need for proactive a mitigation and adaptation policy measures to help address the consequences of extreme events of climate change.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Christie, Mike, and Christopher D. Azevedo. "Testing the Consistency Between Standard Contingent Valuation, Repeated Contingent Valuation and Choice Experiments." Journal of Agricultural Economics 60, no. 1 (February 2009): 154–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.2008.00178.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Faramarzi, Ahmad, Ahmad Sadeghi, and Javad Javan Noughabi. "Valuation on Health States: A Contingent Valuation Study." Research Journal of Applied Sciences 13, no. 2 (November 10, 2019): 157–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.36478/rjasci.2018.157.161.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Hausman, Jerry. "Contingent Valuation: From Dubious to Hopeless." Journal of Economic Perspectives 26, no. 4 (November 1, 2012): 43–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.4.43.

Full text

Abstract:

Approximately 20 years ago, Peter Diamond and I wrote an article for this journal analyzing contingent valuation methods. At that time Peter's view was that contingent valuation was hopeless, while I was dubious but somewhat more optimistic. But 20 years later, after millions of dollars of largely government-funded research, I have concluded that Peter's earlier position was correct and that contingent valuation is hopeless. In this paper, I selectively review the contingent valuation literature, focusing on empirical results. I find that three long-standing problems continue to exist: 1) hypothetical response bias that leads contingent valuation to overstatements of value; 2) large differences between willingness to pay and willingness to accept; and 3) the embedding problem which encompasses scope problems. The problems of embedding and scope are likely to be the most intractable. Indeed, I believe that respondents to contingent valuation surveys are often not responding out of stable or well-defined preferences, but are essentially inventing their answers on the fly, in a way which makes the resulting data useless for serious analysis. Finally, I offer a case study of a prominent contingent valuation study done by recognized experts in this approach, a study that should be only minimally affected by these concerns but in which the answers of respondents to the survey are implausible and inconsistent.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Macdonald, Heather, and Daniel McKenney. "Varying levels of information and the embedding problem in contingent valuation: the case of Canadian wilderness." Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26, no. 7 (July 1, 1996): 1295–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1139/x26-144.

Full text

Abstract:

This study examines the effect of providing varying amounts of information and embedding to contingent valuation respondents in the context of wilderness reservation. Contingent valuation is a technique developed to assess the monetary value of nonmarket goods by asking survey respondents how much they would be willing to pay (or accept) for an increase (or decrease) in the level of provision of such goods. Embedding refers to obtaining willingness-to-pay measures for a good when it is valued as part of a larger good. When subjects were provided with more complete information to make evaluations, their willingness-to-pay responses were reasonably consistent across levels of embedding. In contrast, when little background information was provided, willingness-to-pay amounts were inconsistent and showed significantly more variability and greater signs of embedding. In addition, low-information subjects volunteered more protest zeros and reported feeling slightly less confident of their responses. Perhaps the most interesting finding was the difference in mean valuations depending on how much background information subjects received. This issue of information provision can be a problematic challenge for contingent-valuation practitioners.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Kumakawa, Takehisa. "Contingent valuation of scenic lakes." Tourism Economics 22, no. 5 (October 2016): 1121–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.5367/te.2014.0455.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

McFadden, Daniel. "Contingent Valuation and Social Choice." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76, no. 4 (November 1994): 689–708. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1243732.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Kriström, Bengt. "Spike Models in Contingent Valuation." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 79, no. 3 (August 1997): 1013–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1244440.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Ralston, Scott N., William M. Park, and Edward J. Frampton. "Contingent Valuation And Recreational Demand." Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR) 7, no. 3 (October 19, 2011): 116. http://dx.doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v7i3.6234.

Full text

Abstract:

A contingent valuation model is developed to estimate the value of the recreational experience for visitors to Reelfoot Lake in northwestern Tennessee. Hicksian compensating variation measures of consumer surplus were estimated. Individual willingness-to-pay and aggregate willingness-to-pay were calculated for the lake.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Schlapfer, Felix, and Nick Hanley. "Contingent Valuation and Collective Choice." Kyklos 59, no. 1 (February 2006): 115–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.2006.00323.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

O'Neill, John. "Contingent valuation and qualitative democracy." Environmental Politics 5, no. 4 (December 1996): 752–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09644019608414303.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Carson, Richard T. "Contingent Valuation: A User's Guide†." Environmental Science & Technology 34, no. 8 (April 2000): 1413–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es990728j.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Halstead, John M., A. E. Luloff, and Thomas H. Stevens. "Protest Bidders in Contingent Valuation." Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 21, no. 2 (October 1992): 160–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0899367x00002683.

Full text

Abstract:

Protest bids are often excluded during analysis of contingent valuation method data. It is suggested that this procedure might introduce significant bias. Protest bids are often registered by respondents who may actually place ahigher-orlower-than-average value on the commodity in question but refuse to pay on the basis of ethical or other reasons. Exclusion of protest bids may therefore bias willingness to pay (WTP) results, but the direction of bias is indeterminate a priori.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Câmara, António. "VALUATION OF EVENT-CONTINGENT OPTIONS." Journal of Financial Research 29, no. 4 (December 2006): 537–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6803.2006.00193.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Bishop, Richard C., Kevin J. Boyle, Richard T. Carson, David Chapman, W. Michael Hanemann, Barbara Kanninen, Raymond J. Kopp, et al. "Contingent valuation: Flawed logic?—Response." Science 357, no. 6349 (July 27, 2017): 363.2–364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0197.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Schläpfer, Felix. "Contingent valuation: A new perspective." Ecological Economics 64, no. 4 (February 2008): 729–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.010.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Akter, Sonia, Jeff Bennett, and Sanzida Akhter. "Preference uncertainty in contingent valuation." Ecological Economics 67, no. 3 (October 2008): 345–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.07.009.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Gregory, Robin, and Lita Furby. "Auctions, experiments and contingent valuation." Public Choice 55, no. 3 (October 1987): 273–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00124872.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Tidwell, James B. "Users are willing to pay for sanitation, but not as much as they say: empirical results and methodological comparisons of willingness to pay for peri-urban sanitation in Lusaka, Zambia using contingent valuation, discrete choice experiments, and hedonic pricing." Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development 10, no. 4 (September 19, 2020): 756–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/washdev.2020.072.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Significant investment is needed to improve peri-urban sanitation. Consumer willingness to pay may bridge some of this gap. While contingent valuation has been frequently used to assess this demand, there are few comparative studies to validate this method for water and sanitation. We use contingent valuation to estimate demand for flushing toilets, solid doors, and inside and outside locks on doors and compare this with results from hedonic pricing and discrete choice experiments. We collected data for a randomized, controlled trial in peri-urban Lusaka, Zambia in 2017. Tenants were randomly allocated to discrete choice experiments (n = 432) or contingent valuation (n = 458). Estimates using contingent valuation were lower than discrete choice experiments for solid doors (US$2.6 vs. US$3.4), higher for flushing toilets ($3.4 vs. $2.2), and were of the opposite sign for inside and outside locks ($1.6 vs. $ − 1.1). Hedonic pricing aligned more closely to discrete choice experiments for flushing toilets ($1.7) and locks (−$0.9), suggesting significant and inconsistent bias in contingent valuation estimates. While these results provide strong evidence of consumer willingness to pay for sanitation, researchers and policymakers should carefully consider demand assessment methods due to the inconsistent, but often inflated bias of contingent valuation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Hanemann, W. Michael. "Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation." Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, no. 4 (November 1, 1994): 19–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.4.19.

Full text

Abstract:

Contingent valuation is now used around the world to value many types of public goods, including transportation, sanitation, health, and education, as well as the environment. The author describes how researchers go about making such surveys reliable, mentioning recent innovations in sampling, questionnaire design, and data analysis, including formulating the valuation as a closed-ended question about voting in a referendum to raise taxes for a particular purpose. He addresses various objections that contingent valuation results are incompatible with economic theory. Even without a market, there still exists a latent demand curve for nonmarket goods; contingent valuation represents a way to tease this out.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Portney, Paul R. "The Contingent Valuation Debate: Why Economists Should Care." Journal of Economic Perspectives 8, no. 4 (November 1, 1994): 3–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.8.4.3.

Full text

Abstract:

The contingent valuation method, wherein sample surveys are used to elicit individuals’ willingness to pay for certain types of policies, is playing an important role in government decision-making. The most prominent applications are in the valuation of damages to natural resources from oil spills. But the contingent valuation method will be more important still if it is used to expand the range of impacts included in applied benefit-cost analyses. This paper explains the origins of the contingent valuation method and the route through which it came to be the center of both an academic and a legal debate.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Kitaibekova, Sara, Zhailau Toktassynov, and Dani Sarsekova. "ECONOMIC VALUATION OF FOREST ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN THE NATIONAL PARK “BURABAY” USING CONTINGENT VALUATION METHOD." 3i intellect idea innovation - интеллект идея инновация 2 (2023): 112–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.52269/22266070_2023_2_112.

Full text

Abstract:

The article considers Contingent Valuation Method (CVM) which is used to estimate economic values for all kinds of ecosystem and environmental services. The contingent valuation method involves directly asking people, in a survey, how much they would be willing to pay for specific environmental services. This method was applied for visitors of the State National Nature Park “Burabay” where 350 respondents were asked. In some cases, people are asked for the amount of compensation they would be willing to accept to give up specific environmental services. Five steps of application of CVM were used: to define the valuation problem; to make preliminary decisions about the survey itself, including whether it will be conducted by mail, phone or in person, how large the sample size will be, who will be surveyed, and other related questions; the actual survey design; the actual survey implementation; to compile, analyze and report the results.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Moore, William, Walter F. Baber, and Robert V. Bartlett. "Loss Aversion and Rationality in Cutback Management: A Deliberative Democratic Approach to Contingent Valuation." Public Finance and Management 12, no. 3 (September 2012): 237–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/152397211201200304.

Full text

Abstract:

Contingent valuation is a widely used and well-understood technique for the valuation of non-market resources. But under conditions of fiscal stress and budget reduction, the phenomenon of loss aversion (the tendency of otherwise rational people to place a higher value on a good they stand to lose than they did before it came into their possession) poses significant challenges to contingent valuation of public goods. This paper proposes inverting the process of contingent valuation and making it more deliberatively democratic in order to determine what citizens are “willing to sacrifice” under conditions of fiscal stress. This re-imagined form of contingent valuation offers advantages in terms of governmental transparency, analytical accuracy, and democratic legitimacy. It also allows practitioners of cutback management to incorporate important elements of political consensus building into early stages of the policy process, and it alerts them to the need and opportunity to ameliorate the impacts of spending reductions.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Park, Timothy, and John Loomis. "Comparing Models for Contingent Valuation Surveys: Statistical Efficiency and the Precision of Benefit Estimates." Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 21, no. 2 (October 1992): 170–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0899367x00002695.

Full text

Abstract:

This paper empirically tested the three conditions identified by McConnell for equivalence of the linear utility difference model and the valuation function approach to dichotomous choice contingent valuation. Using a contingent valuation survey for deer hunting in California, two of the three conditions were violated. Even though the models are not simple linear transforms of each other for this survey, estimates of mean willingness to pay and their associated 95% confidence intervals around the mean were quite similar for the valuation methods.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Cortazar, Gonzalo, and Eduardo S. Schwartz. "The Valuation of Commodity Contingent Claims." Journal of Derivatives 1, no. 4 (May 31, 1994): 27–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.3905/jod.1994.407896.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Hoyos, David, and Petr Mariel. "Contingent Valuation: Past, Present and Future." Prague Economic Papers 19, no. 4 (January 1, 2010): 329–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.380.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Heyde, John M. "Is Contingent Valuation Worth the Trouble?" University of Chicago Law Review 62, no. 1 (1995): 331. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1600137.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Blamey, R. K., J. W. Bennett, and M. D. Morrison. "Yea-Saying in Contingent Valuation Surveys." Land Economics 75, no. 1 (February 1999): 126. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3146997.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Horowitz, John K. "A New Model of Contingent Valuation." American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75, no. 5 (December 1993): 1268–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1243470.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Morrison, Mark. "Rethinking contingent valuation: ethics versus defensibility?" International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 2, no. 1 (2002): 22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/ijarge.2002.000020.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Thompson, Eric C. "Contingent Valuation in Arts Impact Studies." Journal of Arts Management, Law, and Society 28, no. 3 (January 1998): 206–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10632929809599555.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Willis, Ken. "Contingent valuation in a policy context." Landscape Research 19, no. 1 (March 1994): 17–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01426399408706415.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Berrens, Robert P. "Reluctant respondents and contingent valuation surveys." Applied Economics Letters 7, no. 4 (April 2000): 263–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/135048500351645.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Lindsey, Greg. "Using Contingent Valuation in Recreation Planning." Public Works Management & Policy 2, no. 4 (April 1998): 306–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1087724x9800200404.

Full text

Abstract:

Throgmorton has argued that survey results are tropes, or rhetorical devices, that establish a context for the frankly political debates that occur within planning processes. Planners responsible for the economic evaluation of plans and projects increasingly are using a particular type of survey, the contingent valuation (CV) survey, to estimate the value of public goods such as water quality and recreation. It is argued in this article that CV is a useful tool for planning and that, following Throgmorton, planners will be more effective if they accept the idea that the results of CV surveys are both scientific and contestable. In this study, the CV-type questions about willingness to pay provided information not available from conventional surveys and helped local decision makers gauge the strength of local support for a parks board. Effective use of CV, like use of other survey data, requires that planners be competent technically and politically.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Kerr, Geoffrey N. "Dichotomous choice contingent valuation probability distributions." Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 44, no. 2 (June 2000): 233–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.00109.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Adler, Matthew D. "Contingent valuation studies and health policy." Health Economics, Policy and Law 5, no. 1 (January 2010): 123–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1744133109990028.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Smith, Richard D., and Tracey H. Sach. "Contingent valuation: has the debate begun?" Health Economics, Policy and Law 5, no. 1 (January 2010): 133–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1744133109990041.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Hammitt, James K., Jin-Tan Liu, and Jin-Long Liu. "Contingent valuation of a Taiwanese wetland." Environment and Development Economics 6, no. 2 (May 2001): 259–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1355770x01000146.

Full text

Abstract:

Wetlands provide a variety of important environmental services including flood control, wildlife habitat, waste treatment, and recreational opportunities. Because most of these services are public goods, the value of wetland preservation cannot be directly obtained from market prices but may be estimated using revealed-preference or stated-preference methods. We estimate the value to local residents of protecting the Kuantu wetland in Taiwan using contingent valuation. Estimates are sensitive to question format, with estimates using a double-bounded dichotomous-choice format about three times larger than estimates using a single open-ended question. Using the open-ended format, the estimated annual mean household willingness to pay to preserve the Kuantu wetland is about US$21. Using the dichotomous-choice questions, the value is about US$65. These estimates suggest the total present-value willingness to pay to preserve Kuantu wetland is about US$200 million to US$1.2 billion (discounted at 5–10%).

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Venkatachalam, L. "The contingent valuation method: a review." Environmental Impact Assessment Review 24, no. 1 (January 2004): 89–124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0195-9255(03)00138-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!