Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Contingent capture of attention / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Contingent capture of attention'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Contingent capture of attention.

Author: Grafiati

Published: 11 March 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Contingent capture of attention.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Remington, Roger W., Charles L. Folk, and John P. Mclean. "Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention?" Perception & Psychophysics 63, no. 2 (February 2001): 298–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/bf03194470.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Leblanc, Émilie, David J. Prime, and Pierre Jolicoeur. "Tracking the Location of Visuospatial Attention in a Contingent Capture Paradigm." Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20, no. 4 (April 2008): 657–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20051.

Full text

Abstract:

Currently, there is considerable controversy regarding the degree to which top-down control can affect attentional capture by salient events. According to the contingent capture hypothesis, attentional capture by a salient stimulus is contingent on a match between the properties of the stimulus and top-down attentional control settings. In contrast, bottom-up saliency accounts argue that the initial capture of attention is determined solely by the relative salience of the stimulus, and the effect of top-down attentional control is limited to effects on the duration of attentional engagement on the capturing stimulus. In the present study, we tested these competing accounts by utilizing the N2pc event-related potential component to track the locus of attention during an attentional capture task. The results were completely consistent with the contingent capture hypothesis: An N2pc wave was elicited only by distractors that possessed the target-defining attribute. In a second experiment, we expanded upon this finding by exploring the effect of target-distractor similarity on the duration that attention dwells at the distractor location. In this experiment, only distractors possessing the target-defining attribute (color) captured visuospatial attention to their location and the N2pc increased in duration and in magnitude when the capture distractor also shared a second target attribute (category membership). Finally, in three additional control experiments, we replicated the finding of an N2pc generated by distractors, only if they shared the target-defining attribute. Thus, our results demonstrate that attentional control settings influence both which stimuli attract attention and to what extent they are processed.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Chua, F. "Non-contingent attention capture by an onset." Journal of Vision 10, no. 7 (August 2, 2010): 112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/10.7.112.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Zivony, Alon, and Dominique Lamy. "Contingent Attentional Engagement: Stimulus- and Goal-Driven Capture Have Qualitatively Different Consequences." Psychological Science 29, no. 12 (October 4, 2018): 1930–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797618799302.

Full text

Abstract:

We examined whether shifting attention to a location necessarily entails extracting the features at that location, a process referred to as attentional engagement. In three spatial-cuing experiments ( N = 60), we found that an onset cue captured attention both when it shared the target’s color and when it did not. Yet the effects of the match between the response associated with the cued object’s identity and the response associated with the target (compatibility effects), which are diagnostic of attentional engagement, were observed only with relevant-color onset cues. These findings demonstrate that stimulus- and goal-driven capture have qualitatively different consequences: Before attention is reoriented to the target, it is engaged to the location of the critical distractor following goal-driven capture but not stimulus-driven capture. The reported dissociation between attentional shifts and attentional engagement suggests that attention is best described as a camera: One can align its zoom lens without pressing the shutter button.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Huang, Wanyi, Yuling Su, Yanfen Zhen, and Zhe Qu. "The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture." Psychophysiology 53, no. 5 (February 16, 2016): 650–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12615.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Reeck, Crystal, Kevin S. LaBar, and Tobias Egner. "Neural Mechanisms Mediating Contingent Capture of Attention by Affective Stimuli." Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 24, no. 5 (May 2012): 1113–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00211.

Full text

Abstract:

Attention is attracted exogenously by physically salient stimuli, but this effect can be dampened by endogenous attention settings, a phenomenon called “contingent capture.” Emotionally salient stimuli are also thought to exert a strong exogenous influence on attention, especially in anxious individuals, but whether and how top–down attention can ameliorate bottom–up capture by affective stimuli is currently unknown. Here, we paired a novel spatial cueing task with fMRI to investigate contingent capture as a function of the affective salience of bottom–up cues (face stimuli) and individual differences in trait anxiety. In the absence of top–down cues, exogenous stimuli validly cueing targets facilitated attention in low-anxious participants, regardless of affective salience. However, although high-anxious participants exhibited similar facilitation following neutral exogenous cues, this facilitation was completely absent following affectively negative exogenous cues. Critically, these effects were contingent on endogenous attentional settings, such that explicit top–down cues presented before the appearance of exogenous stimuli removed anxious individuals' sensitivity to affectively salient stimuli. fMRI analyses revealed a network of brain regions underlying this variability in affective contingent capture across individuals, including the fusiform face area (FFA), posterior ventrolateral frontal cortex, and SMA. Importantly, activation in the posterior ventrolateral frontal cortex and the SMA fully mediated the effects observed in FFA, demonstrating a critical role for these frontal regions in mediating attentional orienting and interference resolution processes when engaged by affectively salient stimuli.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Du, Feng, Yue Yin, Yue Qi, and Kan Zhang. "Contingent orienting or contingent capture: A size singleton matching the target–distractor size relation cannot capture attention." Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 21, no. 4 (December 20, 2013): 1011–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0567-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Wang, L., and S. B. Most. "Is contingent attentional capture not contingent on working memory?" Journal of Vision 8, no. 6 (March 20, 2010): 1121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/8.6.1121.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Serences, John T., Sarah Shomstein, Andrew B. Leber, Xavier Golay, Howard E. Egeth, and Steven Yantis. "Coordination of Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Attentional Control in Human Cortex." Psychological Science 16, no. 2 (February 2005): 114–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00791.x.

Full text

Abstract:

Visual attention may be voluntarily directed to particular locations or features (voluntary control), or it may be captured by salient stimuli, such as the abrupt appearance of a new perceptual object (stimulus-driven control). Most often, however, the deployment of attention is the result of a dynamic interplay between voluntary attentional control settings (e.g., based on prior knowledge about a target's location or color) and the degree to which stimuli in the visual scene match these voluntary control settings. Consequently, nontarget items in the scene that share a defining feature with the target of visual search can capture attention, a phenomenon termed contingent attentional capture. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to show that attentional capture by target-colored distractors is accompanied by increased cortical activity in corresponding regions of retinotopically organized visual cortex. Concurrent activation in the temporo-parietal junction and ventral frontal cortex suggests that these regions coordinate voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional control settings to determine which stimuli effectively compete for attention.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Schönhammer, Josef G., and Dirk Kerzel. "Detection costs and contingent attentional capture." Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 79, no. 2 (November 28, 2016): 429–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1248-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Wirth, Benedikt Emanuel, and Dirk Wentura. "Attentional bias to threat in the general population is contingent on target competition, not on attentional control settings." Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 71, no. 4 (January 1, 2018): 975–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1307864.

Full text

Abstract:

Dot-probe studies usually find an attentional bias towards threatening stimuli only in anxious participants. Here, we investigated under what conditions such a bias occurs in unselected samples. According to contingent-capture theory, an irrelevant cue only captures attention if it matches an attentional control setting. Therefore, we first tested the hypothesis that an attentional control setting tuned to threat must be activated in (non-anxious) individuals. In Experiment 1, we used a dot-probe task with a manipulation of attentional control settings (‘threat’ – set vs. control set). Surprisingly, we found an (anxiety-independent) attentional bias to angry faces that was not moderated by attentional control settings. Since we presented two stimuli (i.e., a target and a distractor) on the target screen in Experiment 1 (a necessity to realise the test of contingent capture), but most dot-probe studies only employ a single target, we conducted Experiment 2 to test the hypothesis that attentional bias in the general population is contingent on target competition. Participants performed a dot-probe task, involving presentation of a stand-alone target or a target competing with a distractor. We found an (anxiety-independent) attentional bias towards angry faces in the latter but not the former condition. This suggests that attentional bias towards angry faces in unselected samples is not contingent on attentional control settings but on target competition.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Hilchey, Matthew D., Blaire J. Weidler, and Jay Pratt. "Statistical learning can modulate contingent attentional capture." Journal of Vision 19, no. 10 (September 6, 2019): 139c. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/19.10.139c.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Liao, H. I., and S. L. Yeh. "Contingent attentional capture depends on stimulus properties." Journal of Vision 11, no. 11 (September 23, 2011): 85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/11.11.85.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Wyble, Brad, Charles Folk, and Mary C. Potter. "Contingent attentional capture by conceptually relevant images." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 39, no. 3 (2013): 861–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030517.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Livingstone, Ashley C., Gregory J. Christie, Richard D. Wright, and John J. McDonald. "Signal enhancement, not active suppression, follows the contingent capture of visual attention." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 43, no. 2 (2017): 219–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000339.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Dubbelde, Dick, and Adam Greenberg. "Proportional Context of Distracters alters Top-Down Sets during Contingent Attention Capture." Journal of Vision 17, no. 10 (August 31, 2017): 947. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/17.10.947.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

ARIGA, A., and K. YOKOSAWA. "Contingent attentional capture occurs by activated target congruence." Perception & Psychophysics 70, no. 4 (May 1, 2008): 680–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/pp.70.4.680.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Folk, Charles L., Roger W. Remington, and James C. Johnston. "Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993)." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 19, no. 3 (1993): 682–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.19.3.682.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Barras, Caroline, and Dirk Kerzel. "ERP correlates of contingent attentional capture and suppression." Journal of Vision 15, no. 12 (September 1, 2015): 318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/15.12.318.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Schmidt, James R., and Daniel H. Weissman. "Contingent attentional capture triggers the congruency sequence effect." Acta Psychologica 159 (July 2015): 61–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.05.007.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Prasad and Mishra. "The Nature of Unconscious Attention to Subliminal Cues." Vision 3, no. 3 (August 1, 2019): 38. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vision3030038.

Full text

Abstract:

Attentional selection in humans is mostly determined by what is important to them or by the saliency of the objects around them. How our visual and attentional system manage these various sources of attentional capture is one of the most intensely debated issues in cognitive psychology. Along with the traditional dichotomy of goal-driven and stimulus-driven theories, newer frameworks such as reward learning and selection history have been proposed as well to understand how a stimulus captures attention. However, surprisingly little is known about the different forms of attentional control by information that is not consciously accessible to us. In this article, we will review several studies that have examined attentional capture by subliminal cues. We will specifically focus on spatial cuing studies that have shown through response times and eye movements that subliminal cues can affect attentional selection. A majority of these studies have argued that attentional capture by subliminal cues is entirely automatic and stimulus-driven. We will evaluate their claims of automaticity and contrast them with a few other studies that have suggested that orienting to unconscious cues proceeds in a manner that is contingent with the top-down goals of the individual. Resolving this debate has consequences for understanding the depths and the limits of unconscious processing. It has implications for general theories of attentional selection as well. In this review, we aim to provide the current status of research in this domain and point out open questions and future directions.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Folk, C., A. Berenato, and B. Wyble. "Semantic Priming Produces Contingent Attentional Capture by Conceptual Content." Journal of Vision 14, no. 10 (August 22, 2014): 318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/14.10.318.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Munneke, Jaap, Johannes Jacobus Fahrenfort, David Sutterer, Jan Theeuwes, and Edward Awh. "Multivariate analysis of EEG activity indexes contingent attentional capture." NeuroImage 226 (February 2021): 117562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117562.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Liao, Hsin-I., and Su-Ling Yeh. "Capturing attention is not that simple: Different mechanisms for stimulus-driven and contingent capture." Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 75, no. 8 (September 14, 2013): 1703–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-013-0537-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Moore, Katherine Sledge, and Daniel H. Weissman. "Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: Evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm." Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72, no. 6 (August 2010): 1495–509. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/app.72.6.1495.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Barratt, Daniel, and Claus Bundesen. "Attentional capture by emotional faces is contingent on attentional control settings." Cognition & Emotion 26, no. 7 (November 2012): 1223–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2011.645279.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Anderson, Brian A., and Charles L. Folk. "Dissociating location-specific inhibition and attention shifts: Evidence against the disengagement account of contingent capture." Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 74, no. 6 (June 7, 2012): 1183–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0325-9.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Winther, Gesche N., and Michael Niedeggen. "Distractor-Induced Blindness: A Special Case of Contingent Attentional Capture?" Advances in Cognitive Psychology 13, no. 1 (March 31, 2017): 52–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.5709/acp-0206-5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Folk, Charles L., Andrew B. Leber, and Howard E. Egeth. "Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink." Perception & Psychophysics 64, no. 5 (July 2002): 741–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/bf03194741.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Huffman, Greg, Victoria M. Antinucci, and Jay Pratt. "The illusion of control: Sequential dependencies underlie contingent attentional capture." Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 25, no. 6 (January 12, 2018): 2238–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1422-5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Ansorge, Ulrich, Gernot Horstmann, and Ingrid Scharlau. "Top–down contingent attentional capture during feed-forward visual processing." Acta Psychologica 135, no. 2 (October 2010): 123–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.05.008.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Úlfsson, Tryggvi Örn. "Possibility of Science, Impossibility of Miracles: Léon Brunschvicg against Quentin Meillassoux." Praktyka Teoretyczna 28, no. 2 (October 15, 2018): 124–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/prt.2018.2.6.

Full text

Abstract:

The article argues that, while Quentin Meillassoux‘s project, undertaken in After Finitude, merits attention, since the French philosopher is right that faith in sciences‘ capacity to open up new domains to thought must be restored, the solutions he offers have two serious shortcomings. 1) His depiction of science as the producer of ancestral statements does not capture satisfactorily the essence of scientific creativity. 2) The claim that everything is necessarily contingent is fundamentally incompatible with scientific knowledge. The article, then, contrasts Meillassoux‘s principle of the necessity of contingency with a principle that is extracted from the historical epistemology of Léon Brunschvicg and Antoine-Augustin Cournot. Instead of a principle of unreason, the article defends a principle of a metamorphosing reason founded on the practical impossibility of irreducible contingency.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Blakely, D., T. Wright, W. Boot, and J. Brockmole. "On The Precision of Attention Sets: Effects of Distractor Probability and Temporal Expectations on Contingent Capture." Journal of Vision 11, no. 11 (September 23, 2011): 81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/11.11.81.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

WANG, Hui-Yuan, Ai-Rui CHEN, and Ming ZHANG. "Meaningful contingent attentional orienting effects: Spatial location-based inhibition and capture." Acta Psychologica Sinica 53, no. 2 (2021): 113. http://dx.doi.org/10.3724/sp.j.1041.2021.00113.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Van der Lubbe, Rob H. J., and Jurjen Van der Helden. "Failure of the extended contingent attentional capture account in multimodal settings." Advances in Cognitive Psychology 2, no. 4 (January 1, 2006): 255–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10053-008-0060-x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Atchley, Paul, Arthur F. Kramer, and Anne P. Hillstrom. "Contingent capture for onsets and offsets: Attentional set for perceptual transients." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26, no. 2 (2000): 594–606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.594.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Al-Aidroos, N., M. Giammarco, A. Paoletti, and E. Guild. "Contingent attentional capture by stimuli that match long-term memory representations." Journal of Vision 14, no. 10 (August 22, 2014): 645. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/14.10.645.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Moore, Katherine, Greg Ramos, and Kathleen Trencheny. "Set-specific contingent attentional capture costs are modulated by color similarity." Journal of Vision 15, no. 12 (September 1, 2015): 311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/15.12.311.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Mayer, Jutta S., Keisuke Fukuda, Edward K. Vogel, and Sohee Park. "Impaired Contingent Attentional Capture Predicts Reduced Working Memory Capacity in Schizophrenia." PLoS ONE 7, no. 11 (November 12, 2012): e48586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048586.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Moore, K., E. Wiemers, S. Lee, and C. Santos. "Dual-target contingent attentional capture effects are modulated by associative learning." Journal of Vision 13, no. 9 (July 25, 2013): 87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/13.9.87.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Glickman, Moshe, and Dominique Lamy. "Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces is contingent on implicit attentional settings." Cognition and Emotion 32, no. 2 (March 10, 2017): 303–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2017.1301883.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Gibson, Bradley S., and Erin M. Kelsey. "Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24, no. 3 (1998): 699–706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.699.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Blakely, D. P., R. S. Landbeck, and W. R. Boot. "On the Precision of Attention Sets: The Effects of Spatial Context and Distractor Multiplicity on Contingent Capture." Journal of Vision 12, no. 9 (August 10, 2012): 1345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/12.9.1345.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Reuss, Heiko, Carsten Pohl, Andrea Kiesel, and Wilfried Kunde. "Follow the sign! Top-down contingent attentional capture of masked arrow cues." Advances in Cognitive Psychology 7, no. -1 (January 1, 2011): 82–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/v10053-008-0091-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Du, Feng, Jiaoyan Yang, Yue Yin, Kan Zhang, and Richard A. Abrams. "On the automaticity of contingent capture: disruption caused by the attentional blink." Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 20, no. 5 (February 27, 2013): 944–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0410-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Ito, Motohiro, and Jun I. Kawahara. "Contingent attentional capture across multiple feature dimensions in a temporal search task." Acta Psychologica 163 (January 2016): 107–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.11.009.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Lu, Shena, and Shihui Han. "Attentional capture is contingent on the interaction between task demand and stimulus salience." Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71, no. 5 (July 2009): 1015–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/app.71.5.1015.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Ghorashi, S. M. Shahab, Samantha M. Zuvic, Troy A. W. Visser, and Vincent Di Lollo. "Focal distraction: Spatial shifts of attentional focus are not required for contingent capture." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29, no. 1 (2003): 78–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.29.1.78.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Lamy, D., L. Alon, N. Shalev, and T. Carmel. "The role of conscious perception in contingent attentional capture and working memory updating." Journal of Vision 14, no. 10 (August 22, 2014): 643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/14.10.643.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Wu, C. t., D. H. Weissman, and M. G. Woldorff. "Contingent attentional capture occurs only for irrelevant stimuli that can be consciously perceived." Journal of Vision 6, no. 6 (March 24, 2010): 602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/6.6.602.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!