Academic literature on the topic 'Consumption inequality'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Consumption inequality.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Consumption inequality"
Attanasio, Orazio P., and Luigi Pistaferri. "Consumption Inequality." Journal of Economic Perspectives 30, no. 2 (May 1, 2016): 3–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.2.3.
Full textAttanasio, Orazio, Gabriella Berloffa, Richard Blundell, and Ian Preston. "From Earnings Inequality to Consumption Inequality." Economic Journal 112, no. 478 (March 1, 2002): C52—C59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0297.00030.
Full textAguiar, Mark, and Mark Bils. "Has Consumption Inequality Mirrored Income Inequality?" American Economic Review 105, no. 9 (September 1, 2015): 2725–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.20120599.
Full textPark, Ki-baeg. "Relation between Income & Consumption Inequality and Decomposition of Consumption Inequality." Journal of Korean Public Policy 19, no. 3 (September 30, 2017): 149–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.37103/kapp.19.3.6.
Full textSlesnick, Daniel T. "Consumption, Needs and Inequality." International Economic Review 35, no. 3 (August 1994): 677. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2527080.
Full textKhieu, Hoang, and Tien Van Nguyen. "Progressive consumption tax, minimum consumption, and inequality." Economics Letters 197 (December 2020): 109653. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2020.109653.
Full textJappelli, Tullio, and Luigi Pistaferri. "Does consumption inequality track income inequality in Italy?" Review of Economic Dynamics 13, no. 1 (January 2010): 133–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.red.2009.11.001.
Full textTheloudis, Alexandros. "Consumption inequality across heterogeneous families." European Economic Review 136 (July 2021): 103765. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2021.103765.
Full text이소정. "Consumption Inequality of Elderly Households." Korean Journal of Social Welfare Studies 40, no. 1 (March 2009): 235–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.16999/kasws.2009.40.1.235.
Full textBlundell, R., and I. Preston. "Consumption Inequality and Income Uncertainty." Quarterly Journal of Economics 113, no. 2 (May 1, 1998): 603–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355398555694.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Consumption inequality"
Walther, Herbert. "Competitive conspicuous consumption, household saving and income inequality." Inst. für Volkswirtschaftstheorie und -politik, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, 2004. http://epub.wu.ac.at/1116/1/document.pdf.
Full textSeries: Working Papers Series "Growth and Employment in Europe: Sustainability and Competitiveness"
Velilla, Gómez Raúl Alfonso. "Intra-household consumption inequality: empirical evidence from Brazil." Universidade Federal de Viçosa, 2017. http://www.locus.ufv.br/handle/123456789/10576.
Full textMade available in DSpace on 2017-06-07T16:12:42Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 texto completo.pdf: 639015 bytes, checksum: 6d172e56d3b4ae0a2486335de257019e (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-02-24
A análise da desigualdade tradicionalmente tem-se baseado em medidas de renda em nível domiciliar, ignorando a distribuição de recursos dentro do agregado familiar. De fato, a análise tradicional da desigualdade baseia-se no modelo unitário de comportamento do consumidor, que assume uma distribuição igualitária dos recursos entre os membros da família. Ao fazê-lo, aspectos importantes como os ganhos decorrente do consumo conjunto, que poderiam influenciar o bem-estar individual, não são levados em consideração. Esta desvantagem ocorre porque os microdados sobre o consumo costumam fornecer informações ao nível do agregado familiar, em lugar de fornecê-lo ao nível individual, tornando impossível obter medições diretas da desigualdade com base no consumo individual. O Brasil não é exceção nesta questão e a análise de como o processo de alocação de recursos dentro dos domicílios é dado não tem recebido muita atenção e continua sendo um enigma. Para preencher essa lacuna, esta pesquisa aplica um modelo de consumo coletivo para analisar a desigualdade econômica entre indivíduos de famílias brasileiras. Para alcançar este objetivo, identificaram-se as chamadas parcelas de recursos, que são consideradas medidas das despesas de consumo individual e podem ser estimadas diretamente a partir de dados em nível domiciliar. Em particular, foi identificada a participação de cada membro no consumo total de sua família, por meio de suas despesas com bens privados, como roupas e sapatos. Assim, informações sobre o bem-estar econômico de cada membro da família foram obtidas. Este estudo utilizou microdados da Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares (POF 2008/2009) coletada pelo Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). A análise foi restrita a famílias tradicionais, ou seja, casais sem ou com até três filhos. Os resultados empíricos revelaram a existência de desigualdade na alocação de recursos dentro dos domicílios. Em particular, verificou-se que nas famílias brasileiras os homens absorvem uma maior fração dos recursos familiares do que as mulheres, em todos os tamanhos das famílias analisadas. Verificou-se também que a proporção dos recursos totais dedicados às crianças aumenta com o número de crianças, mas a proporção média por criança decresce. Além disso, os resultados sugerem que o nível de educação dos adultos parece estar associado a uma maior parte de sua fração na despesa total, mas negativamente relacionado com os recursos de seu parceiro. Por outro lado, constatou-se um efeito positivo da participação das mulheres no mercado de trabalho e seu nível de educação sobre as parcelas dos recursos de seus filhos. Ademais, os resultados identificam uma possível heterogeneidade na alocação de recursos dentro do agregado familiar entre as regiões. Em particular, verificou-se que famílias localizadas nas regiões Sudeste e Nordeste parecem distribuir seus recursos de forma mais igualitária entre os seus membros comparados com às outras regiões. Em geral, os resultados obtidos não rejeitaram o modelo coletivo de comportamento dos domicílios em todas as estimativas. Em contrapartida, nós rejeitamos o modelo unitário padrão. Finalmente, esses resultados são informativamente cruciais para o desenho de políticas redistributivas ou programas sociais porque proporcionam uma visão mais ampla e mais precisa do bem-estar dos indivíduos. Mais precisamente, nossos resultados podem informar os formuladores de políticas sobre como beneficiar aos indivíduos efetivamente dentro dos domicílios, a fim de minimizar a incidência da desigualdade, bem como fornecer informações úteis para os programas de Transferência Condicionada de Renda (como Bolsa-Família) sobre como desenhar as transferências de forma mais eficiente.
The analysis of inequality has been traditionally based on measures of income at the household level, ignoring the distribution of resources within the household. In fact, the traditional analysis of inequality had been based on the unitary model of consumer behavior, which assume an equal distribution of resources among family members. In doing so, important aspects as gains from joint consumption, that could influence individual well-being, are not taken into account. This drawback has occurred because typical micro-data on consumption usually provide information at the household level instead of at individual level, making it impossible to obtain direct measures of inequality based on individual consumption. Brazil is not an exception on this issue and the analysis of how the intra-household resource allocation process is given has not received much attention and remains a puzzle. In order to fill this gap, this research apply a collective consumption model to analyze economic inequality among individuals of Brazilian families. To achieve this, we identify the so-called resource shares, which are considered useful measures of individual consumption expenditure and can be estimated directly from household level data. In particular, we identify each member’s share of total household consumption through his or her expenditure on a private assignable goods such as clothing and footwear. Therefore, we are able to recover information about the economic well-being of household members. This study used micro-level dataset from the Consumer Expenditure Survey (POF 2008/2009) collected by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE). Our analysis has focused on traditional families, married couples with zero to three children. Our empirical results reveal the existence of inequality in the allocation of resources inside the household. In particular, we found that in Brazilian families men absorb a higher fraction of family resources than women in all family sizes. We also found that the share of total resources devoted to children increases with the number of children, but the average per child share decreases. In addition, our results suggest that adults’ education level seems to be associated to a larger of his or her fraction of the total expenditure, but is negatively related with resources of her or his partner. Our finding reveal a positive effect of women’s participation in the labor market and her education level with the shares devoted to their children. Furthermore, our results identify a possible heterogeneity in the allocation of resources inside the household across regions. In particular, we found that families located in Southeast and Northeast regions seems to distribute their resources more equally among their members compared to the other regions. In general, our results did not reject the collective model in all estimations. By contrast, we do reject the standard unitary model. Finally, our results are informatively crucial for the design of redistributive policy or social programs, because they provide a broader and more accurate view of the well-being of individuals. More precisely, they could inform policy makers about how to target individuals effectively within households in order to minimize the incidence of inequality as well as provide useful information for Conditional Cash Transfer programs (such as Bolsa- familia) on how to address the transfers more efficiently.
Sem Lattes
Crespo, Cuaresma Jesus, Jozef Kubala, and Kristina Petrikova. "Does income inequality affect aggregate consumption? Revisiting the evidence." WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, 2016. http://epub.wu.ac.at/4787/1/wp210.pdf.
Full textSeries: Department of Economics Working Paper Series
Crespo, Cuaresma Jesus, Jozef Kubala, and Kristina Petrikova. "Does income inequality affect aggregate consumption? Revisiting the evidence." Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00181-017-1302-x.
Full textSebu, Joshua. "Essays on farm household credit constraint, productivity and consumption inequality in Malawi." Thesis, University of Kent, 2017. https://kar.kent.ac.uk/59977/.
Full textFIRPO, SERGIO PINHEIRO. "INCOME AND CONSUMPTION INEQUALITY OVER TIME: A COHORT ANALYSIS USING BRAZILIAN HOUSEHOLD DATA." PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO, 1999. http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=14579@1.
Full textBANCO DE INVESTIMENTO DA BAHIA
Este trabalho apresenta os dados de desilgualdade, entre as famílias, da renda, dos rendimentos do trabalho e do consumo de bens não duráveis, a partir dos microdados da PNAD [Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios] (Brasil, de 1976 a 1997) e da POF [Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares] (regiões metropolitanas 1987-88 e 1995-96). Para os dados da PNAD obtêm-se, a cada ano, índices de theíl da renda e da renda do trabalho para grupos de famílias com chefes nascidos ao mesmo ano e com a mesma escolaridade. Para a POF, obtêm-se esses índices para essas duas variáveis e para consumo, para famílias nascidas na mesma década e com a mesma escolaridade. Com os dados da POF, analisa-se a evolução temporal da desigualdade de consumo, a qual tende a ser um indicador bem mais fiel, do que a desigualdade de renda, da disparidade permanente de recursos disponíveis e de bem estar entre famílias. Segundo a hipótese de renda permanente, espera-se que a desigualdade de consumo para uma mesma coorte cresça com o tempo. Caso haja impedimentos à validade dessa hipótese, tais como consumidores prudentes (motivo precaução para a poupança), ou restrição de crédito, a desigualdade de consumo passa a depender da evolução da distribuição de rende e de rendimentos do trabalho, podendo, então, crescer ou não com o tempo.
This thesis presents income, earnings and consumption inequality data among Brazilian families. Those data were generated from two different sources: PNDA’s (National Household Survey) micro data for Brazil from 1976 to 1997 and POF’s (Household Expenditures Survey) micro data for the Brazilian metropolitan areas in 1987/88 and 1995/96. Theil’s indexes for family income and earnings among families headed by individuals with same age and educational level were calculated from the PNAD’s data for each year. The same procedure was used for POF’s data, but measures of consumption inequality were also done. From PNAD’s data, one can identify the part of inequality that is explained by age, cohorts, and time effects. The same sort of hypothesis tha Deaton and Paxson (1994) used to identify those three different effects was applied in this current work. In general, the consumption inequality tends to be a more accurate estimator of the permanent disparity of resources and of well being among families than the income inequality is. Therefore, calculations of consumption inequality were held using POF’s data. According to the permanent income hypothesis (PIH), one should expect that the consumption inequality among families of the same cohort grows as time evolves. In the case that there are some constraints to the PIH, as prudent consumers or credit constraints, the consumption inequality stars depending on the temporal evolution of income and earnings distribution, which allows that consumption inequality does not grow with time.
Ding, Yi. "Three Essays on Taxation, Growth and Consumption." FIU Digital Commons, 2014. http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/etd/1496.
Full textSihra, Colson Eve. "Consumption, social interactions and preferences." Thesis, Paris, Institut d'études politiques, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017IEPP0015/document.
Full textThe notion of need often characterizes the strict minimum amount of food and shelter to survive. Needs have however recurrently been described as essentially relative and context-driven. Indeed, cultural and social incentives tend to provide powerful motivations for individuals to engage in choices sometimes detrimental to their short- or long-term fitness. These choices reveal certain needs which are beyond mere sustenance. My thesis aims at better understanding these decisions by including cultural and social components to a standard theory of consumption. By doing so, it contributes to bridge the gap between two important branches of the literature: demand analysis and behavioral/social economics. The different chapters adress questions such as: Why do malnourished people spend a significant portion of their budget on conspicuous goods (first chapter)? Why do people of different social groups choose to consume different types of goods, given similar prices, income and demographics (second chapter)? Do social interactions contribute to the persistence of localized tastes (third chapter)? And does market integration contribute to taste convergence (fourth chapter)? These topics require to take into account the social meaning of consumption choices, aside from income, prices and functionality. In other words, they require to consider consumption as a language
Ren, Yanjun [Verfasser]. "Essays on food consumption, income inequality, and health-related issues in China / Yanjun Ren." Kiel : Universitätsbibliothek Kiel, 2017. http://d-nb.info/1130656616/34.
Full textXie-Uebele, Runli. "Three essays on skill-specific labor markets, inequality and consumption over the business cycle." Doctoral thesis, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.18452/16342.
Full textThis dissertation addresses the labor market performance and consumption dynamics of different socioeconomic groups. The first part examines the connection between cyclical variations in skilled and unskilled labor markets. Using a business cycle model with search frictions in skill-specific markets, I find that imperfect substitution between skilled and unskilled labor creates an important channel for variations in the skill-specific markets. Together with a skill-neutral or -biased technology shock, the model generates downward-sloping Beveridge curves in aggregate and skill-specific labor markets. I extend the study to allow for a dynamic link between the skill-specific labor markets. Human capital investment is determined endogenously and idiosyncratic shocks shift the skilled labor share and change tightness in both skilled and unskilled markets. Upon a neutral shock, the decrease of total unemployment is two-staged: Firstly with a reduction in unskilled unemployment, and then with a sharp decline of skilled unemployment when skill substitution dominates. A larger elasticity of substitution between the two types of labor leads to higher volatility of the model variables and higher correlation between unemployment and vacancies. The second part studies the link between group-specific consumption growth and its volatility in a framework of heterogeneous agents, under the assumption of a consumption externality. Household preferences are related to the consumption growth volatility through asset holding decisions: The volatility decreases with groups'' patience, and increases with the eagerness to keep up with the group average. Moreover, consumption growth is expected to be positively related to its volatility. This last hypothesis is tested using household data imputed from the German Socio-Economic Panel and the German Income and Expenditure Survey, where a U-shaped relationship is found between nondurable consumption growth and its volatility.
Books on the topic "Consumption inequality"
Aguiar, Mark. Has consumption inequality mirrored income inequality? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2011.
Find full textPaul, Satya. Inequality, poverty, and consumption. New Delhi: Commonwealth Publishers, 1989.
Find full textHalnon, Karen Bettez. The Consumption of Inequality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137352491.
Full textKrueger, Dirk. Does income inequality lead to consumption inequality?: Evidence and theory. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2002.
Find full textDeaton, Angus. Intertemporal choice and inequality. Cambridge, Mass: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1993.
Find full textDines, Gail. Pornography: The production and consumption of inequality. New York: Routledge, 1998.
Find full textArvind, Chaturvedi. Consumption expenditure and inequality in rural India. Noida: Birla Economic Research Foundation, 1990.
Find full textSchiff, Maurice. On the inefficiency of inequality. [Washington, D.C: World Bank, 2004.
Find full textAttanasio, Orazio P. What really happened to consumption inequality in the us? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 2004.
Find full textKrueger, Dirk. Does income inequality lead to consumption equality?: Evidence and theory. [Minneapolis, Minn.]: Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 2005.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Consumption inequality"
Kenner, Dario. "The carbon footprint of luxury consumption." In Carbon Inequality, 12–24. Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge, 2020. | Series: Routledge focus on environment and sustainability: Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781351171328-2.
Full textColic-Peisker, Val, and Adrian Flitney. "Hyper-consumption and Inequality." In The Age of Post-Rationality, 83–113. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6259-9_4.
Full textMiernik, Mirosław Aleksander. "Economics, Inequality, and Consumption." In Rethinking Fiction after the 2007/8 Financial Crisis, 88–180. New York, NY : Routledge, 2021. | Series: Routledge research in American literature and culture: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003140900-41a.
Full textHalnon, Karen Bettez. "Introduction Weapons of Mass Distraction." In The Consumption of Inequality, 1–12. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137352491_1.
Full textHalnon, Karen Bettez. "Conclusion Tourists, Victims, and Deadening Others." In The Consumption of Inequality, 171–87. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137352491_10.
Full textHalnon, Karen Bettez. "Financial Crisis, Ideology, and Alienation." In The Consumption of Inequality, 13–25. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137352491_2.
Full textHalnon, Karen Bettez. "Critiquing Postmodernist Zeitgeist." In The Consumption of Inequality, 27–42. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137352491_3.
Full textHalnon, Karen Bettez. "Prison Chic." In The Consumption of Inequality, 43–65. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137352491_4.
Full textHalnon, Karen Bettez. "Black Ghetto Cool." In The Consumption of Inequality, 67–82. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137352491_5.
Full textHalnon, Karen Bettez. "White Trash Stigma." In The Consumption of Inequality, 83–116. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137352491_6.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Consumption inequality"
Wu, Qiaosheng, Valerie Clulow, and Svetlana Maslyuk. "Energy consumption inequality and human development." In 2010 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering (ICMSE). IEEE, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icmse.2010.5719973.
Full textXu, Lei. "A Summary of Studies on Consumption Inequality." In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Culture, Education and Economic Development of Modern Society (ICCESE 2019). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/iccese-19.2019.437.
Full textJuruss, Maris, Baiba Šmite-Roķe, and Anita Zeila. "THE METHOD FOR EVALUATION OF CONSUMPTION TAX REGRESSIVITY." In 12th International Scientific Conference „Business and Management 2022“. Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/bm.2022.842.
Full textKumar, Aanchal, Sushil Kumar, Omprakash Kaiwartya, and Abdul Abdullah. "Optimizing energy consumption and inequality in wireless sensor networks using NSGA-II." In The International Conference on Communication and Computing Systems (ICCCS-2016). Taylor & Francis Group, 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300, Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742: CRC Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781315364094-66.
Full textYing-chun, Wang, and Huang Shuxian. "The Impact of Income Inequality on Consumption Demand of Urban Residents in Zhejiang Province." In 2009 Second International Conference on Future Information Technology and Management Engineering (FITME). IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/fitme.2009.33.
Full textŞen, Asım. "Some Major Causes of Current Economic Crises and Leadership Strategies." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c01.00167.
Full textTekin, İpek, and Başak Gül Akar. "A Vicious Circle: The Interaction between Income Distribution and Household Indebtedness in the Neoliberal Era." In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c13.02543.
Full textWang, Liping, and Xue Meng. "Urban-rural Social Security Imbalance and Consumption Inequality: A Study Based on the Dynamic Panel Data Model." In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Education Innovation and Economic Management (ICEIEM 2019). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/iceiem-19.2019.9.
Full textVenkateswaran, Prabhakar, Andrew D. Marshall, David R. Noble, Jerry M. Seitzman, and Tim C. Lieuwen. "Turbulent Consumption Speed Scaling of H2/CO Blends." In ASME 2011 Turbo Expo: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition. ASMEDC, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/gt2011-45401.
Full textIzgarskaya, Anna A., and Ekaterina A. Gordeychik. "WORLD-SYSTEM ASPECTS OF EDUCATIONAL INEQUALITY IN A PERIPHERIZED SOCIETY." In All-Russian Conference with International Participation "Education, Social Mobility, and Human Development: to the 90th Anniversary of Prof. L.G. Borisova". Novosibirsk State University, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.25205/978-5-4437-1383-0-151-161.
Full textReports on the topic "Consumption inequality"
Aguiar, Mark, and Mark Bils. Has Consumption Inequality Mirrored Income Inequality? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, February 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w16807.
Full textEtheridge, Ben. House prices and consumption inequality. The IFS, September 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1920/wp.ifs.2019.1924.
Full textKrueger, Dirk, and Fabrizio Perri. Does Income Inequality Lead to Consumption Inequality? Evidence and Theory. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, September 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w9202.
Full textBlundell, Richard, Luigi Pistaferri, and Itay Saporta-Eksten. Consumption Inequality and Family Labor Supply. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, October 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w18445.
Full textCoibion, Olivier, Yuriy Gorodnichenko, and Dmitri Koustas. Consumption Inequality and the Frequency of Purchases. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, April 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w23357.
Full textAllen, Donald S., and Leonce Ndikumana. Income Inequality and Minimum Consumption: Implications for Growth. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.20955/wp.1999.013.
Full textAttanasio, Orazio, Erich Battistin, and Hidehiko Ichimura. What Really Happened to Consumption Inequality in the US? Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, March 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w10338.
Full textMeyer, Bruce, and James Sullivan. Consumption and Income Inequality in the U.S. Since the 1960s. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, August 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w23655.
Full textAmromin, Gene, Mariacristina De Nardi, and Karl Schulze. Household Inequality and the Consumption Response to Aggregate Real Shocks. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, November 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w24073.
Full textHan, Jeehoon, Bruce Meyer, and James Sullivan. Inequality in the Joint Distribution of Consumption and Time Use. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, October 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w25199.
Full text