Relevant bibliographies by topics / Constitutional courts – Russia (Federation)

Contents

  1. Journal articles
  2. Dissertations / Theses
  3. Books
  4. Book chapters
  5. Conference papers
  6. Reports

Academic literature on the topic 'Constitutional courts – Russia (Federation)'

Author: Grafiati
Published: 10 March 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Constitutional courts – Russia (Federation).'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Constitutional courts – Russia (Federation)"

1

Henderson, Jane, and Marina Lomovtseva. "Constitutional Justice in Russia." Review of Central and East European Law 34, no. 1 (2009): 37–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157303509x406223.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe 1993 Russian Constitution and 1994 Federal Constitutional Law “On the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation” define the jurisdiction and activity of the Federal Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. However, these pieces of legislation do not comprehensively address all the issues, and there has been some broadening of the Court's power through interpretation and the effect of some other legislation. This article examines the Court's jurisdiction and some of the issues that arise in the exercise thereof, as well as the relative role of the constitutional or charter courts of the subjects of the Federation, and the relationship between the Constitutional Court and the other courts in the Russian federal system. Issues of the methods of constitutional interpretation are addressed. The importance of the Constitutional Court as the federal agency of constitutional court supervision (review) in ensuring the effective application of the Russian Constitution is highlighted in the context of this growth of a comparatively new branch of law in the Russian legal system.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Abashidze, A. Kh, M. V. Ilyashevich, and A. M. Solntsev. "Anchugov & Gladkov v. Russia." American Journal of International Law 111, no. 2 (April 2017): 461–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2017.31.

Full text
Abstract:
On April 19, 2016, in The Case Concerning the Resolution of the Question of the Possibility to Execute in Accordance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation the Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights of 4 July 2013 in the Case of Anchugov and Gladkov v. Russia in Connection with the Request of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation (Anchugov & Gladkov (Russ.)), the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (Constitutional Court) held that decisions of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) are binding on Russian courts, in accordance with Article 15(4) of the 1993 Constitution of the Russian Federation. At the same time, the Constitutional Court stressed the necessity of ensuring a reasonable balance between the obligation to implement ECtHR judgments and respect for the fundamental principles of the Russian Federation's constitutional system. The Constitutional Court found that because the ECtHR judgment in question implicitly conflicted with provisions of the Russian Constitution, Russian courts are not obliged to comply with the judgment regarding issues that remain in conflict; however, other means are available to the Russian legislature to give effect to the judgment. While the decision marks an important development in Russia's relationship with the European system of human rights, it is not inconsistent with the approach taken by a substantial number of European domestic courts in holding that treaty obligations to enforce decisions of international courts cannot justify violating domestic constitutional norms.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Savoskin, Alexandr V., Vitali V. Kuriatnikov, and Veronika A. Meshcheryagina. "Prospects for normative control in the subjects of the Russian Federation after the 2020 amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation." Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research 8, no. 4 (2022): 113–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.21684/2411-7897-2022-8-4-113-130.

Full text
Abstract:
Prior to the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation in 2020, three types of courts could carry out normative control in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation: the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, constitutional (charter) courts of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation and courts of general jurisdiction. Amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation led to amendments to the Federal Constitutional Law “On the Judicial System of the Russian Federation”. The constitutional (statutory) courts of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation were abolished. The competence of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation to verify the normative acts of the authorities of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation on complaints from citizens was expanded. The partial overlap of competence between the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, courts of general jurisdiction and constitutional (charter) courts of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation has disappeared. However, the issue of verification of normative acts arose if these acts were adopted by the authorities of a constituent entity of the Russian Federation within the exclusive jurisdiction of the constituent entity of the Russian Federation (based on Article 73 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. The Federal Constitutional Law “On the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation” expressly prohibits verification of such normative acts by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. Verification of such acts in courts of general jurisdiction is not formally prohibited by the Code of Administrative Procedure of the Russian Federation, but contradicts the federal nature of the state and Article 73 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. They cannot invalidate contested acts, but they can use other mechanisms to ensure the regime of constitutional and legal legality in the constituent entities of the Russian Federation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Krjažkova, Ol’ga. "Die Bedeutung der russischen Verfassungsreform des Jahres 2020 für die Verfassungsgerichtsbarkeit." osteuropa recht 67, no. 1 (2021): 27–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/0030-6444-2021-1-27.

Full text
Abstract:
The article analyzes the 2020 Russian constitutional reform with a special focus on constitutional justice. The author discusses the changes of the Constitution and the legislation on the Federal Constitutional Court and the Constitutional Courts of the constituent entities (subjects) of the Russian Federation. The analysis shows three main developments: First, the liquidation of the constitutional (charter) courts of the subjects of the Federation and their possible replacement by councils within legislative bodies. Secondly, changes of the organization of the Constitutional Court (the reduction of the number of its members, the decision that dissenting opinions of judges are no longer published), and of its relationship with other state bodies (increased dependence on the president and the Federation Council). Thirdly, the changes of the powers of the Constitutional Court (expansion of the powers and reduction of the capacity to consider complaints about violations of constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens). The analyses also looks on previous changes of the legal regulations in this area and the case law of these courts. The article shows that the changes were made gradually and are affected by the current Russian political regime. Lastly, it shows that the constitutional reform did not strengthen, but weakened the institutions of constitutional justice in Russia.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Kurilyuk, Yu E., and D. A. Garanin. "Constitutional and Statutory Courts of Constituent Entities of Russia in the National Judicial System: Past, Present and Future." Humanities and Social Sciences. Bulletin of the Financial University 11, no. 4 (January 28, 2022): 66–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.26794/2226-7867-2021-11-4-66-72.

Full text
Abstract:
The regional bodies of constitutional control have existed for more than 30 years, and during their work, they caused heated debates among legal scholars regarding their necessity. From January 1, 2023, these courts will cease to exist throughout the country because the wording of the federal Constitution and the law “On the Judicial System of the Russian Federation” has been changed. The researchers consider the legal regulation of the activities of constitutional and statutory courts and the history of their activity, draw parallels with the legal regulation of such instances abroad, analyse the problems of the “high cost” of the functioning of constitutional and statutory courts, and propose approaches that could significantly optimise the financing of the constitutional and statutory courts of the subjects. The authors present a comparative table on the number of cases considered by the courts, analyse their competence, consider the problematic issues of its differentiation from the competence of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the possibility of assigning consideration of matters under the jurisdiction of the constitutional (statutory) courts to the courts of general jurisdiction.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Stenichkin, N. G. "Issues of Superion Courts of the Russian Federation when Implementing the Legislative Initiative." Rossijskoe pravosudie 10 (September 25, 2020): 32–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909x.2020.10.32-41.

Full text
Abstract:
The problem. The concept of «issues of reference» is used in the Constitution of the Russian Federation when listing the subjects of the law of legislative initiative in relation to the judiciary. The legislation does not disclose or define this concept, which leads to discussion about its content and, as a result, raises questions about the practical implementation of the separation of powers principle in the legislative process. Aims and objectives of the study: we determined the limitations of the law of legislative initiative of the higher courts of Russia from the point of view the legal grounds for such restrictions, their subjects and legal consequences. Methods: we use both the common scientific methods (e. g. systemic, deductive) as the special-legal methods (formal, dogmatic, state-legal modeling method, comparative legal method etc.). Results: we conclude that «issues of reference» is a special constitutional legal term used in the Constitution of the Russian Federation to describe all functions of the certain branch of power or the public authority. This term in its content is broader than the concepts of «authority», «subjects of jurisdiction» and «jurisdiction». The use of the term «issues of reference» towards the higher courts, as subjects of the right of legislative initiative, does not allow us to assert the constitutional sense of existence various types of legislative initiative right, such as general right and limited (special) right. The practice of exercising the right of legislative initiative by the higher courts, as well as the applying the Procedure Rules of the State Duma of the Russian Federation does not provide for any restrictions on the right of courts to initiate bills. Russian legislation lacks mechanisms for applying the term «issues of reference» as an instrument restricting the constitutional right of the higher courts to participate in the legislative process. Also, such mechanisms are not reflected in the regulatory framework governing the activities of the higher courts. The term «issues of reference», applied to the legislative initiative right of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, does not imply any exemptions from the right to initiate bills given by the Constitution to other entities, but this term is used in the delimitation of legislative functions between the higher courts.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

BARTSITS, IGOR N. "Rethinking the relationship between international and national law at the turn." Public Administration 22, no. 1 (2020): 33–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.22394/2070-8378-2020-22-1-33-42.

Full text
Abstract:
The article is devoted to revealing the specifics of the implementation of such areas of constitutional law as the constitutionalization of international law and the internationalization of constitutional law by the example of additions to Article 79 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, as well as the practices of the Italian Constitutional Court, the Federal Constitutional Court of Germany, etc. The author examined in sufficient detail the procedures for extending the effect of international law and international treaties of Russia to the national legal system, analyzed the concept of counter-limits in European and national judicial practice, presented the basic principles of interaction between European and national courts (the principle of subsidiarity, the principle of proportionality, the principle of ‘sincere cooperation’, method of ‘dialogue of judges’). There is a need for an updated understanding of the term ‘constitutional sovereignty of the state’, which is based on domestic norms on fundamental rights and norms on the foundations of the constitutional system, which presupposes the inadmissibility of any foreign or international influence that violates the requirement of priority of the norms and principles of the national Constitution in the national legal system. The article substantiates the expediency of using the doctrine of counter-limits in the Russian Federation as an instrument of constitutional self-defense, ensuring constitutional sovereignty and preserving constitutional identity.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Sviridenko, O. M. "The 2020 Constitutional Reform: An Independent Constitutional and Legal Status of Commercial (Arbitrazh) Courts being fixed for the First Time." Actual Problems of Russian Law 17, no. 12 (December 16, 2022): 39–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2022.145.12.039-045.

Full text
Abstract:
The paper analyzes the interim results of the 2020 constitutional reform, which affected the foundations of the judiciary in the territory of the Russian Federation. The author assumes and justifies that there is a change in priorities and vectors of legislative work in the field of commercial (arbitrazh) procedural legislation. Based on the analysis of the history of the creation of commercial (arbitrazh) courts, the author makes a conclusion about the formation and development of commercial (arbitrazh) courts as an independent procedural form of the exercise of judicial power in modern Russia. An assessment of the role of Professor V.F. Yakovlev in the creation of commercial (arbitrazh) courts in Russia is given. The author notes the importance of fixing the constitutional and legal status of the system of commercial (arbitrazh) courts. The author shares the opinion, which is of enormous theoretical and practical importance, that the activity of commercial (arbitrazh) courts is a form of exercising judicial power both in the sphere of civil and administrative proceedings. In the context of the problem of a possible «absorption» by the unified Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, including the Commercial (Arbitrazh) Procedure Code, the adoption of amendments to the Constitution reduces such a threat. The author concludes that the rules of commercial (arbitrazh) procedural law, being improved, undergoing different editions, allowing for disputes and discussions at the scientific and practical level, have been preserved as an independent branch of law. At the same time, these rules are, along with the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the fundamental basis of the independent legal status of the commercial (arbitrazh) courts system.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Brezhnev, O. V. "Preliminary Constitutional Review and its Implementation in Russia: Problems of Theories and Applications." Actual Problems of Russian Law 15, no. 10 (October 29, 2020): 36–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.119.10.036-043.

Full text
Abstract:
The paper is devoted to the problems concerning the legal nature, normative regulation and the procedure for the implementation of the institute of preliminary constitutional review in the Russian Federation. Although the exercise of this type of constitutional control ensurs the prevention of the detected violations, it also carries certain risks associated with the limited time frame of its implementation, impossibility of taking into account interpretation of the contested norm in law enforcement, etc. The author demonstartes permissible forms of the use of preliminary control in the activity of the bodies of constitutional justice in Russia (when checking the constitutionality of international agreements and treaties of the Russian Federation, evaluating constitutional amendments, etc.). The author also investigates the practice of implementing the relevant powers. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation that stipulate the limits of the implementation of preliminary judicial constitutional review. The paper examines the issue of the powers of constitutional (charter) courts of constituent entities of the Russian Federation in the area under consideration.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Dzidzoev, Ruslan Mukharbekovich. "Questions of federal structure in the revised version of the Constitution of Russia." Юридические исследования, no. 7 (July 2020): 29–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.25136/2409-7136.2020.7.33720.

Full text
Abstract:
The subject of this research is the questions of constitutional reform regarding the federal structure of Russia, which require scientific assessment. The object of this research is the legal acts that laid the groundwork for the constitutional reform in Russia: Message of the President of the Russian Federation to the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation of January 15, 2020; Law on the Amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation; Conclusion of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on Conformity with the Amendment of the Current Constitution of Russia. Detailed analysis is conducted on the content of the constitutional amendments, their correlation with the legal logic and the needs of constitutional federal progress in Russia. The combination of applied methods (general scientific and private scientific, such as formal-legal, comparative-legal, systemic) allows determining the degree and limits of impact of the constitutional amendments upon the federal structure of Russia. The key conclusions consist in ascertainment of the large-scale constitutional federal reform in Russia oriented towards the principles of state unity and territorial integrity, which received prominent and holistic reflection in the revised version of the Constitution; need to complete federal reform at the current legislative level via amending the Federal law “On The General Principles Of Organization of Legislative (Representative) and Executive Authorities of Constituent Entities of the Russian Federation”, as well as the Constitution and statues of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, which should be brought into compliance with the new revision of the Main Law of Russia. The author's special contribution to this research lies in a systemic analysis of recent amendments to the Constitution of Russia, which testify to substantial changes in federal structure of the country. The novelty is defined by the analysis of new constitutional provisions characterizing the content of the constitutional reform in Russia with regards to federal structure, which have not been previously examined in legal science.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Constitutional courts – Russia (Federation)"

1

Rapoport, Yuri. "A critical analysis of the extent to which the personal civil rights recognised in the constitution of the Russian Federation are enjoyed under Russian law /." Gold Coast, QLD : Bond University, 2006. http://epublications.bond.edu.au/theses/rapoport.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (SJD) -- Bond University, 2006.
"This thesis is submitted to Bond University in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Legal Science"-- t.p. Bibliography: pages 117-125. Also available via the World Wide Web.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Matrosov, Pavel Igorevich. "Comparative analysis of constitutional law mechanism for human rights protection in Canada and Russia." Thesis, McGill University, 2004. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=80941.

Full text
Abstract:
This thesis offers a comparative analysis of the Constitutional law mechanism for human rights protection in Canada and Russia. Russia is experiencing a transition from the former soviet regime towards democracy and civil society. Since the beginning of the transition in 1991 Russia has made three major steps in that direction: the adoption of the Declaration of Rights and Freedoms of the Individual and Citizen of 1991, the Constitution of 1993 and the ratification of the European Convention on Human Rights in 1998. However, the existent constitutional law mechanism for human rights protection is not fully effective due to its novelty for Russian society. A number of lessons can be learned from the Canadian and European experiences of human rights protection. Among them is the necessity to build the mechanism for human rights protection that will be based on the rule of law, direct application of the Constitution, and the creation of a human rights culture, supported by the people's trust in independent judicial institutions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Lherbette-Michel, Isabelle. "L’idee russe de l’Etat, contribution a la théorie juridique de l’Etat : le cas russe des origines au postcommunisme." Thesis, Bordeaux 4, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013BOR40064.

Full text
Abstract:
Il existe une continuité dans l’« idée » russe de l’Etat qu’une analogie dans la continuité des systèmes ne reflète pas. De la Russie impériale à la Russie soviétique, l’Etat (Gosudarstvo) n’est pas conçu comme une entité abstraite et autonome. A la dimension césariste du pouvoir correspond la non-émergence, et du concept et de la réalité d’un Etat. Jusqu’en 1917, la conception russe du pouvoir est conditionnée par le discours idéologique – religieux. Après 1917, sa principale caractéristique est d’être subordonnée à l’idéologie, en tant qu’expression de la volonté du Parti communiste. L’Etat soviétique s’impose donc comme un Etat « de fait » et non comme un Etat « de droit ». La prédominance du discours idéologique entrave, à la fois, la constitution d’une culture de l’Etat, qui reste une culture du pouvoir, et la formation d’une culture de l’antériorité et de la supériorité du droit sur l’Etat. Après la désintégration de l’Union soviétique, la référence à la démocratie libérale et à l’Etat de droit devient un outil de la création d’une nouvelle légitimité pour l’Etat postcommuniste. L’entrée de la Russie dans la modernité politique nécessite une rupture avec les postulats idéologiques du passé. Or, la déconstruction du socialisme est un processus beaucoup plus complexe que la construction de la démocratie. Bien qu’ayant subi, sur plusieurs siècles, plusieurs types de transitions – de l’absolutisme de droit divin au socialisme, puis au postcommunisme -, l’Etat russe a donc conservé certains caractères constants et typiques qui en font, encore aujourd’hui, un modèle hybride, en tension entre autoritarisme et démocratie
There is a continuity as concerns the « idea » of the state that an analogy with the different systems does not reflect. From imperial to Soviet Russia, the state (Gosudarstvo) is not thought of as an abstract and autonomous entity. Until 1917, the Russian conception of power is conditioned by the religious ideological discourse. After 1917, her main feature is one of submission to ideology, in other words the expression of the will of the Communist Party. The Soviet state stands out by its « de facto » nature, rather than a « de jure » state. The supremacy of the ideological discourse hampers both the constitution of a new state culture, which remains focused on power, and the formation of the precedence and the superiority of law over the state. After the disintegration of the Soviet Union, reference to liberal democracy and the rule of law becomes a tool in creating renewed legitimacy for the postcommunist state. Russia’s entry into political modernity demands a rupture with the ideological postulates of the past. The dismantlement of socialism is a much more complex process than the construction of democracy. Despite having been subjected, over centuries, to many types of transition – absolutism founded on divine right to socialism, then postcommunism -, the Russian state has always preserved certain features (be they constant or specific) that make it, and still today, a hybrid model pulling towards both authoritarianism and democracy
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Kouznetsov, Serguei. "La mise en œuvre de la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme dans le nouveau contexte fédéral russe : (1993-2012)." Thesis, Bordeaux 4, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012BOR40062.

Full text
Abstract:
Après la chute de l’Union des Républiques Socialistes Soviétiques en décembre 1991, la Fédération de Russie affirme à maintes reprises son engagement à suivre un développement démocratique et à faire partie de « l’Europe sans frontières ». Pour atteindre cet objectif, elle adhère à toute une série de traités européens, entre autres, à la Convention européenne de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales. Toutefois, malgré la volonté affichée par la Russie de faire partie du système européen de protection des droits fondamentaux, les problèmes de transition politique, institutionnelle et économique rendent cette tâche très difficile. Entre autres le fédéralisme, qu’on peut qualifier de « complexe », crée un système juridique très singulier dont certains éléments ne sont pas toujours compatibles avec les instruments internationaux en matière des droits de l’homme ratifiés par la Russie. L’objectif de ce travail est d’étudier les problèmes de la mise en œuvre de la Convention européenne de sauvegarde des droits de l’homme et des libertés fondamentales et des décisions de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme en Fédération de Russie et leur possible influence sur le développement des instruments de protection des droits fondamentaux dans les conditions du système fédéral existant en Russie
After the fall of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics in December 1991, the Russian Federation stated repeatedly its commitment to democratic development and to be part of "Europe without borders". To achieve this goal it joins a number of European treaties, among others, the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. However, despite the willingness of Russia to be part of the European system of protection of fundamental rights, the problems of political transition, economic and institutional development make this task very difficult. Among other the federalism, which could be qualified as "complex", creates a very singular legal system. Some of its elements are not always compatible with international instruments on human rights protection ratified by Russia. The objective of this work is to study the problems of implementation of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights in the Russian Federation and their possible influence on the development of national instruments for the protection of fundamental rights under the Russian federal system
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

MAZMANYAN, Armen. "Finding optimal design for constitutional courts : the perspective of democratization in post-Soviet countries." Doctoral thesis, 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/1814/12042.

Full text
Abstract:
Defence date: 22 June 2009
Examining Board: Ruth Rubio Marin, European University Institute; Wojciech Sadurski, European University Institute (Supervisor); Marek Safjan, University of Warsaw; András Sajo, European Court of Human Rights, Strasbourg
First made available online 12 March 2019
The thesis undertakes an assessment of the institutional design of constitutional courts in postsoviet countries from the perspective of these courts' democratic contributions. After identifying the defects of the existing models frustrating a better democratic performance by these courts, the thesis proposes a perspective on their redesign. Although a variety of settings of institutional architecture of constitutional review courts is discussed throughout the text, the thesis primarily concentrates on two fundamental questions of the design of constitutional courts: 1. "political empowerment" of these courts or whether or not constitutional tribunals should have responsibilities of conflict resolving nature which de-facto involve them in partisan-type politics (such as the review of elections, jurisdictional conflicts between the separated branches of the government, impeachment cases, etc.), and 2. designation of a separate tribunal or the question whether or not the Kelsenian design of constitutional courts is optimal given the specific local challenges facing democracy and rule of law. As a point of departure, the thesis develops a concept of "optimal institutional design" based on its review of the latest feedbacks from the studies of constitutional design, new institutionalism and transitology. Providing facts and analyses about the post-soviet countries of this research (for this research, these are all former republics of the Soviet Union except Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania) on their way to building constitutional democracies, their path towards democracy and their democratic credentials, the constitutional courts and their performance, the history of these courts' emergence, organization, institutional settings, etc., the work proceeds further by defending the political empowerment of the constitutional courts by running into an empirical analysis of higher courts' involvement into politics and by praising the courts' political role in democratic development. This background allows reflecting on the weaknesses and the dangers of the current institutional settings and proposing a conceptual framework for constitutional construction in post-communist transitions, as well as, more specifically, proposing an "optimal" design for the political empowerment of constitutional courts. Eventually, a criticism of the Kelsenian model of constitutional review is drawn where it is argued that while the designation of a special (Kelsenian) tribunal has undermined the consolidation of the judiciary and hence contributed to the fragmentation and eventual weakening of the judiciary in the post-Soviet region, there are institutional design alternatives which would better support the emergence of a consolidated, self-sufficient judiciary as the foremost guarantor of the rule of law.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Constitutional courts – Russia (Federation)"

1

Judging Russia: Constitutional Court in Russian Politics, 1990-2006. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Politics, judicial review and the Russian constitutional court. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Bondarʹ, N. S. Rossiĭskiĭ sudebnyĭ konstitut︠s︡ionalizm: Vvedenie v metodologii︠u︡ issledovanii︠a︡ = Judicical constitutionalism of Russia : introduction to the investigation methodology. Moskva: Formula prava, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Bondarʹ, N. S. Sudebnyĭ konstitut︠s︡ionalizm v Rossii v svete konstitut︠s︡ionnogo pravosudii︠a︡. Moskva: Norma, 2011.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Vitruk, Nikolaĭ Vasilʹevich. Konstitut͡s︡ionnoe pravosudie v Rossii: 1991-2001 gg. : ocherki teorii i praktiki. Moskva: "Gorodet͡s︡-izdat", 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Gadzhiev, G. A. Kommentariĭ k Federalʹnomu konstitut︠s︡ionnomu zakonu "O Konstitut︠s︡ionnom Sude Rossiĭskoĭ Federat︠s︡ii". Moskva: Norma, 2012.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Brezhnev, O. V. Problemy zashchity osnovnykh prav i svobod grazhdan v pori︠a︡dke konstitut︠s︡ionnogo sudoproizvodstva. Kursk: Rossiĭskai︠a︡ akademii︠a︡ gos. sluzhby pri Prezidente Rossiĭskoĭ Federat︠s︡ii, Orlovskai︠a︡ regionalʹnai︠a︡ akademii︠a︡ gos. sluzhby, Kurskiĭ filial, 2000.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

(Federation), Russia, ed. Kommentariĭ k Federalʹnomu konstitut︠s︡ionnomu zakonu "O Konstitut︠s︡ionnom Sude Rossiĭskoĭ Federat︠s︡ii". 2nd ed. Moskva: Chastnoe pravo, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

(Federation), Russia. Federalʹnyĭ konstitut͡s︡ionnyĭ zakon o Konstitut͡s︡ionnom Sude Rossiĭskoĭ Federat͡s︡ii: Kommentariĭ. Moskva: Izd-vo "I͡U︡rid. lit-ra", 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Kri͡azhkov, V. A. Konstitut͡sionnai͡a i͡ustit͡sii͡a v Rossiĭskoĭ Federat͡sii: Uchebnoe posobie dli͡a studentov i͡uridicheskikh vuzov i fakulʹtetov. Moskva: Izd-vo BEK, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Book chapters on the topic "Constitutional courts – Russia (Federation)"

1

Chashchina, Svetlana I. "The Participation of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in the Procedure of the Introduction of Amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation: Strengthening National Security Aspects." In Сooperation and Sustainable Development, 761–70. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77000-6_91.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Kremyanskaya, Elena A. "Constitutional Asymmetry in Russia: Issues and Developments. A Country Study of Constitutional Asymmetry in the Russian Federation." In Constitutional Asymmetry in Multinational Federalism, 399–427. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-11701-6_15.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Ward, Adrian, and Dmitri Bartenev. "Russia." In The International Protection of Adults. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/9780198727255.003.0053.

Full text
Abstract:
Russia is a civil law country. It is a federation of constituent entities (‘entities’). Laws affecting adults are made mainly at the federal level. Entities have very limited powers in this regard, such as defining the structure of public agencies responsible for implementing federal standards. The judicial system comprises courts of general jurisdiction (which hear both civil and criminal cases), commercial courts, the federal constitutional court, and (in some entities) regional constitutional courts. Courts of first instance are justice of the peace, district, and regional courts. The highest court with general jurisdiction is the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. District courts hear most adult protection cases, for which there are no special tribunals.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Globa, Mariia Viktorovna. "Sources of Formation of Legal Positions of Russian Highest Judicial Bodies." In Economics and Law, 130–42. Publishing house Sreda, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.31483/r-99419.

Full text
Abstract:
The present study is devoted to determining the place and role of legal positions of higher judicial bodies of Russia (judicial legal positions) in the mechanism of legal regulation. Let us specify in advance that the author means the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation (taking into account the 2014 amendments made to the legislation concerning the liquidation of the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation) as the higher judicial bodies of Russia. Establishing the meaning and role of judicial legal positions in the mechanism of legal regulation is carried out by the author of this study through the analysis and demonstration of the main sources of formation of legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. In this regard, the author of this work identifies as sources of formation of judicial legal positions: legal and non-legal. Non-legal sources of formation of legal positions of the highest courts of Russia differ from the legal ones in the fact that initially they do not have material expression, exist in the abstract, however, have no less importance for the process of formation of judicial legal positions. To the legal sources of creating legal positions of the highest judicial bodies of Russia the author includes: formal sources of law, current legal practice, legal doctrine. As non-legal sources of formation of legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation are: the inner conviction of a judge and professional legal consciousness of a judge. The author of this scientific research consistently reveals the importance and role of each source of formation of judicial legal positions. The conducted study of the most significant sources of formation of judicial legal positions allowed to better understand the place of legal positions of higher courts of Russia in the legal system and their role in legal regulation, which is reduced not just to the interpretation of judicial acts, but also to the formation of new legal provisions, which ultimately form a uniform judicial practice. Methodological basis of the study consisted of: analysis, synthesis, comparative-legal method, deduction, induction and other ways of knowledge used in science. Scientific conclusions and proposals contained in this work may serve as a basis for further theoretical study of the problems of judicial legal positions and used in the activities of legislative and law enforcement bodies.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Socher, Johannes. "Russia, the Right to Self-Determination and Sovereignty." In Russia and the Right to Self-Determination in the Post-Soviet Space, 57–94. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192897176.003.0003.

Full text
Abstract:
Chapter 2 is the first of three chapters analysing Russia’s post-Soviet state practice with regard to the right to self-determination in the territory of the former Soviet Union. It shows that for situations inside the Russian Federation, the Russian constitutional order acknowledges the right of peoples to self-determination, albeit strictly within its territorial boundaries and with a sometimes unusual or even flawed argumentation. In the Russian Constitution, the right of peoples to self-determination appears in two central provisions, but unlike its Soviet predecessors, it does not recognize a constitutional right of secession. Furthermore, the right to self-determination of a single ethnic group in Russia is said to be always trumped by Russia’s state sovereignty and territorial unity. Consequently, a right of secession is also dismissed in Russian constitutional doctrine. Two case studies on the conflicts over Chechnya and Tatarstan confirm this general assessment. In both cases, the Russian Constitutional Court discussed the relationship between the right to self-determination and Russia’s territorial integrity in two separate court decisions, and in both instances arrived at the conclusion that international law does not provide for a right of secession.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

"Decision-Making and Dissent in the Russian Federation Constitutional Court." In International and National Law in Russia and Eastern Europe, 1–17. Brill | Nijhoff, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004480766_004.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

"Courts and Judges." In The Constitution of the Russian Federation. Hart Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781509935604.ch-007.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Albert, Richard. "Why Amendment Rules?" In Constitutional Amendments, 39–60. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190640484.003.0002.

Full text
Abstract:
Virtually all constitutions codify amendment rules. But why? What are the uses and purposes of constitutional amendment rules? Amendment rules of course create a legal process for reformers to alter the constitution. But amendment rules serve important purposes even if the constitution is never amended at all because they have essential uses beyond the obvious one of textual alteration. Amendment rules have three categories of uses: formal, functional, and symbolic. Their formal uses include repairing imperfections, distinguishing constitutional from ordinary law, entrenching rules against easy repeal or revision, and establishing a predictable procedure for constitutional change. Their functional uses include checking the court, promoting democracy, heightening public awareness, pacifying change, and managing difference. Symbolically, amendment rules can be used to express constitutional values. This chapter explains all of these many uses of amendment rules and illustrates each of them with examples drawn from constitutions around the world. This chapter also interrogates the symbolic uses of amendment rules: How can we know whether the values expressed in constitutional amendment rules reflect authentic political commitments? This chapter explains with reference to the German Basic Law that it is possible to evaluate the authenticity of the values in amendment rules by investigating the design of amendment rules and their subsequent interpretation. This chapter considers constitutions from Afghanistan, Albania, Algeria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, the Central African Republic, Chad, China, Cuba, Ecuador, Germany, Kazakhstan, Kiribati, Saint Lucia, South Africa, Spain, the Russian Federation, the Soviet Union, Ukraine, the United States, and Yugoslavia.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Fakeeva, L. E. "ON THE QUESTION OF THE UNITY OF THE STATUS OF JUDGES OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL (CHARTER) COURTS OF SUBJECTS OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION." In POLICY AND RIGHT 20, 130–43. Amur State University, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.22250/pal.2020.13.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

William E, Butler. "7 International Treaties in Russian Judicial and Arbitral Practice." In International Law in the Russian Legal System. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198842941.003.0008.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter explores the role of Soviet and post-Soviet Russian courts in interpreting and applying international treaties. It is clear that Soviet courts dealt more frequently with treaties than the scanty published judicial practice of that period suggests. This early body of treaties may also have contributed to the emergence in the early 1960s of priority being accorded to Soviet treaties insofar as they contained rules providing otherwise than Soviet legislation. Whatever the volume of cases involving treaties that were considered by Soviet courts prior to 1991, the inclusion of Article 15(4) in the 1993 Russian Constitution transformed the situation. A further transformation occurred when the Russian Federation acceded to the 1950 European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and began to participate in the deliberations of the European Court for Human Rights in Strasbourg.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Constitutional courts – Russia (Federation)"

1

Bocharova, N. N. "The role of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in ensuring national security." In SCIENCE OF RUSSIA: TARGETS AND GOALS. "Science of Russia", 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.18411/sr-10-08-2019-24.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Едреев, Тамерлан Шайх-Магомедович. "INFLUENCE OF DECISIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT ON HUMAN RIGHTS ON THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OF RUSSIA." In Научные исследования в современном мире. Теория и практика: сборник избранных статей Всероссийской (национальной) научно-практической конференции (Санкт-Петербург, Май 2021). Crossref, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.37539/nitp316.2021.22.90.011.

Full text
Abstract:
В статье исследуются постановления Европейского суда по правам человека в качестве источника права в Российской Федерации, раскрывается значение судебной практики Европейского суда по правам человека в системе источников конституционного права России. The article examines the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights as a source of law in the Russian Federation, reveals the importance of the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights in the system of sources of constitutional law in Russia.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Bocharova, N. N. "Priority of decisions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation over decisions of the European human rights courts." In НАУКА РОССИИ: ЦЕЛИ И ЗАДАЧИ. НИЦ «Л-Журнал», 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.18411/sr-10-10-2018-30.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Филиппов, О. А., and З. И. Бикмеева. "RUSSIA IN THE ECHR: EXPERIENCE OF PARTICIPATION." In ИНСТИТУТЫ ЗАЩИТЫ ПРАВ ЧЕЛОВЕКА И ГРАЖДАНИНА В ИСТОРИИ РОССИИ. Crossref, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.56777/lawinn.2023.50.21.017.

Full text
Abstract:
В статье рассматривается вопрос практики участия России в Совете Европы, взаимодействия Конституционного Суда РФ и ЕСПЧ. Автором предпринята попытка анализа нормативных правовых актов и судебной практики ЕСПЧ, судебных органов России и зарубежных стран. Методологической основой исследования выступает совокупность методов, в том числе диалектический, общенаучные и частно-научные методы познания. Отмечается, что имеющийся в прошлом отказ со стороны России от исполнения решений ЕСПЧ был вполне допустим ввиду своеобразия ее правовой культуры и правовой системы. The article discusses the practice of Russia's participation in the Council of Europe, the interaction of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the ECHR. The author attempts to analyze the normative legal acts and judicial practice of the ECHR, judicial bodies of Russia and foreign countries. The methodological basis of the research is a set of methods, including dialectical, general scientific and private scientific methods of cognition. It is noted that Russia's refusal in the past to implement the decisions of the ECHR was quite acceptable due to the peculiarity of its legal culture and legal system.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Lotorev, Evgeniy. "Social policy and constitutional legislation: comparative legal research experience." In Development of legal systems in Russia and foreign countries: problems of theory and practice. ru: Publishing Center RIOR, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.29039/02061-6-177-191.

Full text
Abstract:
The relevance of the problem under study is due to the issues that arise in the process of attempts to build a welfare state; the current situation in the Russian Federation at the present stage of the development of statehood and social phenomena, as well as the difficulties that arise in the regulatory regulation of these groups of public relations. In this regard, this article is aimed at a comprehensive analysis of the issues of the formation of the social state that arise when trying to resolve them by the national legislator. The leading approach to the study of this problem is a comparative legal analysis of the European and domestic experience of building a social security system and the impact of the practice of the European Court of Human Rights on it. The article summarizes the problematic issues related to the search for the optimal domestic model of social security, as well as the doctrinal approach to the topic under consideration.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Dashin, Aleksey, Gennady Pratsko, Olga Shapoval, Lyudmila Svistunova, and Tatyana Kolomeitseva. "Improving the institution of human rights and freedoms in constitutional law in Russia." In East – West: Practical Approaches to Countering Terrorism and Preventing Violent Extremism. Dela Press Publishing House, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.56199/dpcshss.tpbu1155.

Full text
Abstract:
This article discusses the prospects for further constitutional and legal reform in order to maximize the full enjoyment of human rights and freedoms in the Russian Federation. The article attempts to analyze from new positions the most problematic issues of implementing the principles of Russian constitutional law, which traditionally are the rights and freedoms of man and citizen. The authors pay special attention to the analysis of the categorical framework and methodological approaches to the problem under study. The main theoretical and methodological approaches are studied, which include: dialectical, structural-functional, comparative legal and other methods. A comparative analysis of the terms “rights” and “freedoms” of man is of considerable interest, during which similar features and differences are revealed. The authors analyzed the views of leading Russian scientists. In the course of the study, the authors revealed the mechanisms and guarantees ensuring individual freedoms (economic, political, ideological and legal ones). In conclusion, the authors come to the logical conclusion that individual rights and freedoms are the most important factor characterizing modern Russian society.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Бардин, Лев, and Lev Bardin. "On the issue of the right to provide legal assistance." In St. Petersburg international Legal forum RD forum video — Rostov-na-Donu. Москва: INFRA-M Academic Publishing LLC., 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/conferencearticle_5a3a6faa331e66.29746358.

Full text
Abstract:
The law establishes that representatives in the courts can be both lawyers and other persons providing legal assistance, as well as legal representatives. The Constitutional Court in its Resolution No. 15-P of 16.07.2004 indicated that representatives of legal entities in arbitration proceedings can be any person. But in accordance with Item II (A) (a) of the List of Specific Obligations of the Russian Federation for Services Included in Annex I to the Protocol of 16 December 2011 "On the Accession of the Russian Federation to the Marrakesh Agreement on the establishing of the WTO", only those who received the status Lawyer in accordance with Russian law, has the right to represent in criminal courts and Russian arbitration courts, as well as act as a representative of organizations in civil and administrative proceedings and proceedings on cases of administrative violations. Appropriate legislative changes are needed. The law states that the use of the terms "advocacy", "lawyer", "lawyer's chamber", "lawyer’s entity" in the names of organizations is allowed only by lawyers. Every year, Russia's tax inspections register dozens of organizations set up by non-layers, illegally including the above terms in their names. The law should provide not only prohibitions, but also sanctions for violation of these prohibitions. Collegiums of advocates often include the phrase "partners" in their names. But lawyers - members of the board are not partners and do not sign partnership agreements. Partners can not be among the governing bodies of the collegium . The application by collegiums of lawyers of the rules provided for non-commercial partnerships by the Federal Law "On Non-Profit Organizations" in the part of partners is illegal. Only lawyers can establish a lawyer’s bureau and conclude a partnership agreement. But in practice in lawyer’s bureau, persons who do not have the status of a lawyer become partners. In other countries, in associating lawyers limited liability partnerships, along with partners, there are "associates". The introduction of such "associates" in our lawyer’s bureau will be a good alternative to attempts to include commercial organizations in the composition of lawyer entities.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Пешкова, Христина, and Christina Peshkova. "The modern judicial practice in the context of Budget policy and its impact on Constitution Court positions in tax law payments." In St. Petersburg international Legal forum RD forum video — Rostov-na-Donu. Москва: INFRA-M Academic Publishing LLC., 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/conferencearticle_5a3a6fabd66373.41434170.

Full text
Abstract:
The article analyzes trends in the impact of the financial and budget policy of the Russian Federation on the establishment of tax and non-tax payments, the content of the legal positions of the constitutional Court of the Russian Federation in terms of determining their nature. The author cites arguments both in favor and as a criticism of existing legal practice and tax-legal regulation.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Чудин, Георгий Николаевич. "THE PLACE AND ROLE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION IN THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM." In Наукоемкие исследования в технических и естественных науках: сборник статей международной научной конференции (Великий Новгород, Октябрь 2022). Crossref, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.37539/1010.2022.34.47.005.

Full text
Abstract:
В настоящем исследовании анализируется роль и место Конституционного суда РФ. This study analyzes the role and place of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and its formation as a separate body outside the judicial system.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Gurgov, Moisej. "Genesis of the Institute of Arbitration Courts in the Russian Federation." In Current problems of jurisprudence. ru: Publishing Center RIOR, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.29039/02058-6/064-069.

Full text
Abstract:
The article is devoted to the history of the emergence and development of arbitration courts in Russia, the author investigated the prerequisites for the emergence of prototypes of arbitration courts in ancient times, the evolution of the institution of arbitration courts in Russia since the times of Ancient Russia to the present
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Constitutional courts – Russia (Federation)"

1

Krasinsky, Vladislav. ON THE LEGAL POSITIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON RESTRICTIONS ON VOTING RIGHTS BECAUSE OF CRIMIAL RECORD. LJournal, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.18411/a-2018-028.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the extended bibliographies on the topic 'Constitutional courts – Russia (Federation)' for particular source types:
Journal articles Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography