To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Component software.

Journal articles on the topic 'Component software'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Component software.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

S, R. Chinnaiyan, and Somasundaram . "Reliability of Component Based Software with Similar Software Components � a Review." i-manager's Journal on Software Engineering 5, no. 2 (December 15, 2010): 44–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.26634/jse.5.2.1335.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Kwong, C. K., L. F. Mu, J. F. Tang, and X. G. Luo. "Optimization of software components selection for component-based software system development." Computers & Industrial Engineering 58, no. 4 (May 2010): 618–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2010.01.003.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Lau, Kung-Kiu, and Zheng Wang. "Software Component Models." IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 33, no. 10 (October 2007): 709–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tse.2007.70726.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Goguen, Joseph, Doan Nguyen, José Meseguer, Luqi, Du Zhang, and Valdis Berzins. "Software component search." Journal of Systems Integration 6, no. 1-2 (March 1996): 93–134. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02262753.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Morris, J., G. Lee, K. Parker, G. A. Bundell, and Chiou Peng Lam. "Software component certification." Computer 34, no. 9 (2001): 30–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/2.947086.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Phanthanithilerd, Nattapon, and Nakornthip Prompoon. "Verifying Software Requirements Characteristics Based on Rules Defined from Software Component Relationships." Lecture Notes on Software Engineering 4, no. 1 (2016): 27–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.7763/lnse.2016.v4.219.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Min, Byungho, and Vijay Varadharajan. "Rethinking Software Component Security: Software Component Level Integrity and Cross Verification." Computer Journal 59, no. 11 (August 10, 2016): 1735–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/comjnl/bxw047.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Shah, Shubh. "Component Based Software Engineering." International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology 9, no. 8 (August 31, 2021): 1588–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.37632.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract: The central idea of Component Based Engineering is to develop a system software by selecting the well defined software components not used often and assembling them with certain system architecture. Nowadays the software development pattern is far different from the earlier approach as many new concepts are being taken into consideration E.g. QA (QualityAssurance). This term paper includes a detailed description of all the current component based software techniques used as well as their advantages and disadvantages. We also address the quality assurance issue of component based software engineering.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Geum, Yeong-Uk, and Byeong-Seop Park. "Component Retrieval using Extended Software Component Descriptor." KIPS Transactions:PartD 9D, no. 3 (June 1, 2002): 417–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.3745/kipstd.2002.9d.3.417.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Kaur, Arvinder, and Kulvinder Singh Mann. "Component Selection for Component Based Software Engineering." International Journal of Computer Applications 2, no. 1 (May 10, 2010): 109–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.5120/604-854.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Lee, Janghyuk, Se-Joon Hong, Yeong-Wha Sawng, and Ju Seong Kim. "Perceived Subjective Features of Software Components: Consumer Behavior in a Software Component Market." ETRI Journal 31, no. 3 (June 5, 2009): 304–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.4218/etrij.09.0108.0643.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Suranto, Beni. "Software Testing in Component-Based Software Engineering." Advanced Science Letters 22, no. 10 (October 1, 2016): 3110–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1166/asl.2016.8004.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

van der Hoek, Andr�, and Alexander L. Wolf. "Software release management for component-based software." Software: Practice and Experience 33, no. 1 (2002): 77–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/spe.496.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

KRISTIANSEN, MONICA, RUNE WINTHER, and BENT NATVIG. "ON COMPONENT DEPENDENCIES IN COMPOUND SOFTWARE." International Journal of Reliability, Quality and Safety Engineering 17, no. 05 (October 2010): 465–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0218539310003895.

Full text
Abstract:
Predicting the reliability of software systems based on a component approach is inherently difficult, in particular due to failure dependencies between the software components. Since it is practically difficult to include all component dependencies in a system's reliability calculation, a more viable approach would be to include only those dependencies that have a significant impact on the assessed system reliability. This paper starts out by defining two new concepts: data-serial and data-parallel components. Then, this paper illustrates how the components' marginal reliabilities put direct restrictions on the components' conditional probabilities, and proves that the degrees of freedom are much fewer than first anticipated when it comes to conditional probabilities. At last, a test system, consisting of five components, is investigated to identify possible rules for selecting the most important component dependencies. To do this, three different techniques are applied: (1) direct calculation, (2) Birnbaum's measure and (3) Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The results from the analyses clearly show that including partial dependency information may give substantial improvements in the reliability predictions, compared to assuming independence between all software components. The analyses also indicate that including only dependencies between data-parallel components may give predictions close to the system's true failure probability, as long as the dependency between the most unreliable components is included. Including only dependencies between data-serial components may however result in predictions even worse than by assuming independence between all software components.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Nierstrasz, Oscar, Simon Gibbs, and Dennis Tsichritzis. "Component-oriented software development." Communications of the ACM 35, no. 9 (September 1, 1992): 160–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/130994.131005.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Crnkovic, Ivica, Stig Larsson, and Judith Stafford. "Component-based software engineering." ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 27, no. 3 (May 2002): 47–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/638574.638587.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Voas, J. "Composing software component "ilities"." IEEE Software 18, no. 4 (July 2001): 16–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ms.2001.936211.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Boegh, J. "Certifying software component attributes." IEEE Software 23, no. 3 (May 2006): 74–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ms.2006.69.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Kozaczynski, W., and G. Booch. "Component-Based Software Engineering." IEEE Software 15, no. 5 (September 1998): 34–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ms.1998.714621.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Kaur, Arvinder, and Kulvinder Singh Mann. "Component Based Software Engineering." International Journal of Computer Applications 2, no. 1 (May 10, 2010): 105–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.5120/605-855.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Arató, Péter, Zoltán Ádám Mann, and András Orbán. "Extending component-based design with hardware components." Science of Computer Programming 56, no. 1-2 (April 2005): 23–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2004.11.003.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Gulia, Preeti, and Palak Palak. "Component Based Software Development Life Cycle Models: A Comparative Review." Oriental journal of computer science and technology 10, no. 2 (June 3, 2017): 467–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/ojcst/10.02.30.

Full text
Abstract:
The development of high quality software is the need of current technology driven world. Component Based Software Engineering (CBSE) has provided a cost effective, fast and modular approach for developing complex software. CBSE is mainly based on the concept of reusability. Apart from these CBSE has several advantages as well as challenges which are summarized in this paper. Large and complex software development requires management of reusable components and can be selected from component repository and assembled to obtain a working application. Development of components and their assembly is different from traditional softwares which leads to the need of new development paradigms for Component Based Systems (CBS). Software development life cycle (SDLC) provides planned and systematic arrangement of activities to be carried out to deliver high quality products within time and budget. This paper presents a comparative study of component based software development life cycle models with their strengths and weaknesses.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Yang, Fan, Z. H. Dong, and Jue Wang. "Method and Software Generation Platform." Applied Mechanics and Materials 743 (March 2015): 563–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.743.563.

Full text
Abstract:
This paper proposed a method and software generation platform, which can automatically generate C++ codes of math equation, and package the software and method into a standard component. Also, the system integrates different types of methods in the unified information processing system with standard interface and format. Users can create new component and design experimental task with existing components. The system is quite convenient for developers to develop new component, easy for administrators to manage all existing component, and simple for users to design and operate experimental task.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Val'kevich, T. A., Yu V. Kapitonova, A. A. Letichevskii, and N. M. Mishchenko. "Paradigm of software component dictionaries for software development." Cybernetics and Systems Analysis 32, no. 6 (November 1996): 766–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02366858.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Kumar, Gottipalla Ashok. "Comparison Of Conventional Approach with Component Based Software Development." International Journal of Scientific Research 2, no. 2 (June 1, 2012): 141–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.15373/22778179/feb2013/47.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

SITARAMAN, MURALI. "PERFORMANCE-PARAMETERIZED REUSABLE SOFTWARE COMPONENTS." International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 02, no. 04 (December 1992): 567–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0218194092000269.

Full text
Abstract:
Current programming languages support construction of parameterized reusable components that can be adapted and composed to create new functionality. For widespread reuse, software components must also have readily adaptable performance. This paper introduces language mechanisms for creating such performance-parameterized reusable software components and for controlling their performance by "plugging in" appropriate constituent components. A key element of the proposed approach is that it provides inexpensive performance tuning. It permits performance of a tunable component to be changed without modifications to the functionality of the component or its clients; in principle, without the need for re-compilation or re-validation of functionality.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Iqbal, Nayyar, and Jun Sang. "Fuzzy Logic Testing Approach for Measuring Software Completeness." Symmetry 13, no. 4 (April 5, 2021): 604. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/sym13040604.

Full text
Abstract:
Due to advancements in science and technology, software is constantly evolving. To adapt to newly demanded requirements in a piece of software, software components are modified or developed. Measuring software completeness has been a challenging task for software companies. The uncertain and imprecise intrinsic relationships within software components have been unaddressed by researchers during the validation process. In this study, we introduced a new fuzzy logic testing approach for measuring the completeness of software. We measured the fuzzy membership value for each software component by a fuzzy logic testing approach called the fuzzy test. For each software component, the system response was tested by identifying which software components in the system required changes. Based on the measured fuzzy membership values for each software component, software completeness was calculated. The introduced approach scales the software completeness between zero and one. A software component with a complete membership value indicates that the software component does not require any modification. A non-membership value specifies that the existing software component is no longer required in the system or that a new software component is required to replace it. The partial membership value specifies that the software component requires few new functionalities according to the new software requirements. Software with a partial membership value requires partial restructuring and design recovery of its components. Symmetric design of software components reduces the complexity in the restructuring of software during modification. In the study, we showed that by using the introduced approach, high-quality software that is faultless, reliable, easily maintained, efficient, and cost-effective can be developed.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

RAVICHANDRAN, K. S., K. R. SEKAR, and P. SURESH. "A NOVEL APPROACH FOR OPTIMAL GROUPING OF REUSABLE SOFTWARE COMPONENTS FOR COMPONENT BASED SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT SYSTEMS." International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 23, no. 07 (September 2013): 895–912. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0218194013500253.

Full text
Abstract:
Component Based Software (CBS) development is the assembling of already developed components and preparing for integration. For the last two decades, researchers have been concentrating much on CBS both in industry and academia, because CBS helps in the reduction of manpower, cost, software development time and better system maintainability. The selection of the best component from the large collection of components is a difficult task and only few researchers have addressed this issue so far by using optimization techniques. In this paper, we propose a new methodology to group the components effectively, based on the software architecture, by using fuzzy concepts. Again, Fuzzy Clustering Technique (FCT) is introduced to find the optimal grouping between the reusable components and the software architectures. The proposed model has the following advantages: (i) the proposed Fuzzy Weighted Relational Coefficient (FWRC) is used to measure the fuzzy relational value of the suggested 9 component parameters; (ii) A mathematical model is established to remove all less utility leveled components before grouping; (iii) FCT performs on newly developed similarity coefficient formula; (iv) Zero — One programming (optimization) technique is used to optimize the group; (v) Fuzzy Weighted Approach is used to find the dominant component among the component grouping, and (vi) Optimal grouping is achieved by the property, namely, maximizing the cohesion and minimizing the coupling when compared to other methods. Finally, the validation of the derived methodology is verified with sample Business Enterprise Applications.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Kaur, Amandeep, Puninder Kaur, and Payal Kaushal. "Maintainability Procedure in Component-Based Software." Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience 17, no. 11 (November 1, 2020): 5156–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1166/jctn.2020.9357.

Full text
Abstract:
Changes in service requirement of software demands consequent changes in its maintainability. An important aspect of changes is that it affects various factors in Component Based Software Engineering which is reuse-based approach to define, implement, and integrate different components into system. Variety of Component-based software frameworks for distributed, real-time and embedded systems in Component-oriented programming are existing for specific domains in order to deal with different requirements. Functionalities under component based system affecting multiple factors in a distributed environment. It is therefore more than necessary to consider various quality attributes like reliability, maintainability, interpretability and reusability for determining quality assurance. The article presents an approach to enhance the promptness of system maintainability in case of changes in component based software.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

Kotonya, G., and N. Maiden. "Editorial: Component-based software engineering." IEE Proceedings - Software 147, no. 6 (2000): 201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ip-sen:20000937.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Alvaro, Alexandre, Eduardo Santana de Almeida, and Silvio Romero de Lemos Meira. "A software component quality framework." ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 35, no. 1 (January 25, 2010): 1–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1668862.1668863.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Vouillon, Jérôme, and Roberto Di Cosmo. "On software component co-installability." ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 22, no. 4 (October 2013): 1–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2522920.2522927.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Gunner, G. "Review: Component-Based Software Engineering." Computer Bulletin 40, no. 6 (November 1, 1998): 31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/combul/40.6.31-a.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Kaur, Kuljit, and Hardeep Singh. "Evaluating an evolving software component." ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 34, no. 4 (July 6, 2009): 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1543405.1543415.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Chavez, A., C. Tornabene, and G. Wiederhold. "Software component licensing: a primer." IEEE Software 15, no. 5 (1998): 47–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/52.714771.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Sitariman, Marulli, and Bruce Weide. "Component-based software using RESOLVE." ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 19, no. 4 (October 1994): 21–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/190679.199221.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Wooley, Bruce A. "Explanation component of software system." XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students 5, no. 1 (September 1998): 24–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/332925.332933.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Ratneshwer and A. K. Tripathi. "Dependence analysis of software component." ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 35, no. 4 (July 20, 2010): 1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1811226.1811237.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Baker, Nigel, Jean-Marie LeGoff, and Ian Willers. "Panel session on component software." Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 389, no. 1-2 (April 1997): 22–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0168-9002(97)00033-8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Broy, Manfred, Anton Deimel, Juergen Henn, Kai Koskimies, František Plášil, Gustav Pomberger, Wolfgang Pree, Michael Stal, and Clemens Szyperski. "What characterizes a (software) component?" Software - Concepts & Tools 19, no. 1 (March 1998): 49–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s003780050007.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Hair, Abdellatif. "A New Software Component Approach." International Journal of Computer Applications 135, no. 2 (February 17, 2016): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.5120/ijca2016908265.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Adler, R. M. "Emerging standards for component software." Computer 28, no. 3 (March 1995): 68–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/2.366164.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Crnkovic, Ivica, Heinz W. Schmidt, Judith Stafford, and Kurt Wallnau. "Automated Component-Based Software Engineering." Journal of Systems and Software 74, no. 1 (January 2005): 1–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2003.11.016.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Fatima, Fariha, Saqib Ali, and Muhammad Usman Ashraf. "Risk Reduction Activities Identification in Software Component Integration for Component Based Software Development (CBSD)." International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science 9, no. 4 (April 8, 2017): 19–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.5815/ijmecs.2017.04.03.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Ando, Noriaki, Shinji Kurihara, Geoffrey Biggs, Takeshi Sakamoto, Hiroyuki Nakamoto, and Tetsuo Kotoku. "Software Deployment Infrastructure for Component Based RT-Systems." Journal of Robotics and Mechatronics 23, no. 3 (June 20, 2011): 350–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.20965/jrm.2011.p0350.

Full text
Abstract:
In component-based Robotic Technology (RT) systems, launching the system involves installing component binary files to the target computers, instantiation of components, and establishing connections between components. In order to operate RT systems with many CPU nodes effectively, the deployment features provided by the middleware are important. Deployment means system life-cycle management, including software installation, configuring components, and launching components. In this paper, we describe deployment tools for RT systems. The component deployment functionality is realized based on the OMG Robotic Technology Component (RTC) specification [1]. Description formats are defined, a service interface is designed and tools are implemented using the OpenRTM-aist that is the implementation of the OMG RTC specification. The implemented deployment infrastructure is evaluated and discussed, and issues and potential future work are considered.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Lavrischeva, E. M., O. A. Slabospitskaya, A. Yu Stenyashin, and A. L. Kolesnyk. "Object-component development of changeable software systems." PROBLEMS IN PROGRAMMING, no. 1 (January 2016): 003–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.15407/pp2016.01.003.

Full text
Abstract:
Complementary limitations of both Software Product Lines industrial technologies and Lavrischeva – Grishenrko object-component method concerning changeable software development are elicited such as the lack of formalisms for program assets building and ill predictability of this build features. To cope with the limitations universal Model of Software Family Variant Features is proposed expanding its tradi-tional feature model for basic development artifacts. For assets being considered as reusable Components final Changeable Software Object-Component Model is elaborated including the universal model above being adjusted as Software Variability Object-Component Model. The Algebra is depicted for the operations of both the Components configuring and data types transforming over their interaction within changeable software system. These operations are proposed to incorporate into the target process for Changeable Software Family proactive and informed Variability management being represented with its technological chart. The process proposed composes the functions for variability Planning, Implementing and Control as well as Family model/consist Evolving up to the Control results. The functions listed are performed within common information environment structured accordingly to Variant Features Model or its object-component adjustment. Trial software tool for configuring Components in the above process is probed. The usage is depicted of both the framework proposed and this tool over technological lines being implemented in Software Systems Institute of NAS of Ukraine Instrumental-technological complex for changeable software configuring from the components.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Agarwal, Jyoti, Sanjay Kumar Dubey, and Rajdev Tiwari. "Usability evaluation of component based software system using software metrics." Intelligent Decision Technologies 14, no. 3 (September 29, 2020): 281–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/idt-190021.

Full text
Abstract:
Component Based Software Engineering (CBSE) provides a way to create a new Component Based Software System (CBSS) by utilizing the existing components. The primary reason for that is to minimize the software development time, cost and effort. CBSS also increases the component reusability. Due to these advantages, software industries are working on CBSS and continuously trying to provide quality product. Usability is one of the major quality factors for CBSS. It should be measured before delivering the software product to the customer, so that if there are any usability flaws, it can be removed by software development team. In this paper, work has been done to evaluate the usability of CBSS based on major usability sub-factors (learnability, operability, understandability and configurability). For this purpose, firstly software metrics are identified for each usability sub-factor and the value of each sub-factor is evaluated for a component based software project. Secondly, overall usability of the software project is evaluated by using the calculated value of each usability sub-factor. Usability for the same project was also evaluated using Fuzzy approach in MATLAB to validate the experimental work of this research paper. It was identified that the value of usability obtained from software metrics and fuzzy model was very similar. This research work will be useful for the software developer to evaluate the usability of any CBSS and will also help them to compare different version of any CBSS in term of their usability.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Chen, Ji Xiong, Zhen Xi Huang, Zhong Shuang Liu, and Xia Cai. "A Software Engineering Method Based on Bionic Components." Applied Mechanics and Materials 651-653 (September 2014): 1776–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.651-653.1776.

Full text
Abstract:
With the development of Information Technology, the traditional software engineering method is no longer fully meet the needs of software development. Thesis, according to the point of view of bionics, combined with the analysis of animal architecture, presents the concept of bionic components characteristic of animal body organs and the software engineering method which uses bionic components as the basic unit, based on bionic component method for short. In this paper, the bionic component model, the process model based on bionic component method and the life cycle model based on bionic component method are studied. And on the basis of these models, detailed describes the software development method based on bionic components.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Jiang, Long Qiang, Hai Tao Wang, and Yi Ye. "Research on Component-Based Software Reuse Technology." Advanced Materials Research 403-408 (November 2011): 2688–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.403-408.2688.

Full text
Abstract:
The software reuse technology based on components is a solution which can avoid reusable work for software development. The component is among the core technologies of component-based software development, is has become one of the focus in the field of software reuse. This paper presents fundamental concepts and key techniques of software reuse. The emphasis of the paper presents the model of component.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

SinghChhillar, Rajender, and Parveen Kajla. "New Component Composition Metrics for Component based Software Development." International Journal of Computer Applications 60, no. 15 (December 18, 2012): 17–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.5120/9767-3641.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography