Academic literature on the topic 'Component software – Evaluation'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Component software – Evaluation.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Component software – Evaluation"
Yahlali, Mebarka, and Abdellah Chouarfia. "Towards a software component assembly evaluation." IET Software 9, no. 1 (February 2015): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/iet-sen.2014.0001.
Full textAgarwal, Jyoti, Sanjay Kumar Dubey, and Rajdev Tiwari. "Usability evaluation of component based software system using software metrics." Intelligent Decision Technologies 14, no. 3 (September 29, 2020): 281–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/idt-190021.
Full textLIU, Cong. "Quantitative Evaluation of Software Component Behavior Discovery Approach." IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems E104.D, no. 1 (January 1, 2021): 117–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1587/transinf.2020mpl0001.
Full textJi, Xueyun, and Zihui Che. "Research on Evaluation of Component-Based Software Testing." Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 6, no. 6 (June 30, 2013): 1106–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.19026/rjaset.6.4020.
Full textSHARMA, ARUN, RAJESH KUMAR, and P. S. GROVER. "EMPIRICAL EVALUATION AND VALIDATION OF INTERFACE COMPLEXITY METRICS FOR SOFTWARE COMPONENTS." International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 18, no. 07 (November 2008): 919–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0218194008003957.
Full textIsmail, Suryani, Fatihah Mohd, Masita Abdul Jalil, and Wan M. N. Wan Kadir. "Development metrics measurement level for component reusability evaluation approach (CREA)." International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE) 9, no. 6 (December 1, 2019): 5428. http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/ijece.v9i6.pp5428-5435.
Full textBanerjee, Prasenjit, and Anirban Sarkar. "Quality Evaluation of Component-Based Software: An Empirical Approach." International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications 10, no. 12 (December 8, 2018): 80–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.5815/ijisa.2018.12.08.
Full textKoziolek, Heiko. "Performance evaluation of component-based software systems: A survey." Performance Evaluation 67, no. 8 (August 2010): 634–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.peva.2009.07.007.
Full textSaputri, Theresia Ratih Dewi, and Seok-Won Lee. "Software Analysis Method for Assessing Software Sustainability." International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering 30, no. 01 (January 2020): 67–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0218194020500047.
Full textMartens, Anne, Heiko Koziolek, Lutz Prechelt, and Ralf Reussner. "From monolithic to component-based performance evaluation of software architectures." Empirical Software Engineering 16, no. 5 (August 28, 2010): 587–622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10664-010-9142-8.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Component software – Evaluation"
ALVARO, Alexandre. "A software component quality framework." Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 2009. https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/1372.
Full textCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Um grande desafio da Engenharia de Software Baseada em Componentes (ESBC) é a qualidade dos componentes utilizados em um sistema. A confiabilidade de um sistema baseado em componentes depende da confiabilidade dos componentes dos quais ele é composto. Na ESBC, a busca, seleção e avaliação de componentes de software é considerado um ponto chave para o efetivo desenvolvimento de sistemas baseado em componentes. Até agora a indústria de software tem se concentrado nos aspectos funcionais dos componentes de software, deixando de lado uma das tarefas mais árduas, que é a avaliação de sua qualidade. Se a garantia de qualidade de componentes desenvolvidos in-house é uma tarefa custosa, a garantia da qualidade utilizando componentes desenvolvidos externamente os quais frequentemente não se tem acesso ao código fonte e documentação detalhada se torna um desafio ainda maior. Assim, esta Tese introduz um Framework de Qualidade de Componentes de Software, baseado em módulos bem definidos que se complementam a fim de garantir a qualidade dos componentes de software. Por fim, um estudo experimental foi desenvolvido e executado de modo que se possa analisar a viabilidade do framework proposto
CARVALHO, Fernando Ferreira de. "An embedded software component quality evaluation methodology." Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 2010. https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/2412.
Full textUniversidade de Pernambuco
Um dos maiores desafios para a indústria de embarcados é fornecer produtos com alto nível de qualidade e funcionalidade, a um baixo custo e curto tempo de desenvolvimento, disponibilizando-o rapidamente ao mercado, aumentando assim, o retorno dos investimentos. Os requisitos de custo e tempo de desenvolvimento têm sido abordados com bastante êxito pela engenharia de software baseada em componentes (CBSE) aliada à técnica de reuso de componentes. No entanto, a utilização da abordagem CBSE sem as devidas verificações da qualidade dos componentes utilizados, pode trazer conseqüências catastróficas (Jezequel et al., 1997). A utilização de mecanismos apropriados de pesquisa, seleção e avaliação da qualidade de componentes são considerados pontos chave na adoção da abordagem CBSE. Diante do exposto, esta tese propõe uma Metodologia para Avaliação da Qualidade de Componentes de Software Embarcados sob diferentes aspectos. A idéia é solucionar a falta de consistência entre as normas ISO/IEC 9126, 14598 e 2500, incluindo o contexto de componente de software e estendendo-o ao domínio de sistemas embarcados. Estas normas provêem definições de alto nível para características e métricas para produtos de software, mas não provêem formas de usá-las efetivamente, tornando muito difícil aplicá-las sem adquirir mais informações de outras fontes. A Metodologia é composta de quatro módulos que se complementam em busca da qualidade, através de um processo de avaliação, um modelo de qualidade, técnicas de avaliação agrupadas por níveis de qualidade e uma abordagem de métricas. Desta forma, ela auxilia o desenvolvedor de sistemas embarcado no processo de seleção de componentes, avaliando qual componente melhor se enquadra nos requisitos do sistema. É utilizada por avaliadores terceirizados quando contratados por fornecedores a fim de obter credibilidade em seus componentes. A metodologia possibilita avaliar a qualidade do componente embarcado antes do mesmo ser armazenado em um sistema de repositório, especialmente no contexto do framework robusto para reuso de software, proposto por Almeida (Almeida, 2004)
Zhu, Liming Computer Science & Engineering Faculty of Engineering UNSW. "Software architecture evaluation for framework-based systems." Awarded by:University of New South Wales. Computer Science and Engineering, 2007. http://handle.unsw.edu.au/1959.4/28250.
Full textSanches, Mauricio Gruhn. "Um estudo sobre os riscos inerentes a implantação do reuso de componentes no processo de desenvolvimento de software." [s.n.], 2005. http://repositorio.unicamp.br/jspui/handle/REPOSIP/276310.
Full textDissertação (mestrado profissional) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Computação
Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-05T06:59:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Sanches_MauricioGruhn_M.pdf: 621110 bytes, checksum: b9818d8d518e03c417515cfe58fe3990 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2005
Resumo: No mundo globalizado de hoje, a necessidade de se prover sistemas para o gerenciamento do grande volume de informações gerado a cada dia torna imperativa a busca contínua por novas práticas e formas de desenvolvimento de software para a manipulação dessas informações. Isso está vinculado também à necessidade de se conseguir ganhos de qualidade, produtividade e redução de custos em tais desenvolvimentos, pois esses são fatores fundamentais no sucesso do negócio de empresas ligadas à tecnologia da informação. Nesse cenário, o reuso de componentes no processo de desenvolvimento de software vem a exercer um papel importante na concretização desses objetivos. Este trabalho apresenta os conceitos envolvidos no contexto de um processo de desenvolvimento de software baseado em componentes reusáveis. São apresentadas as diferentes formas de reuso, o conceito de componentes reusáveis e as formas que esses componentes podem assumir dentro de um domínio de aplicação. Componentes possuem características diferentes, podem ser originados a partir de diversas fontes e carregam detalhes importantes que devem ser considerados durante a sua documentação. Todos esses aspectos influenciam o grau de reuso de um componente dentro do projeto ou organização. São apresentadas algumas tecnologias que promovem a aplicação do reuso de componentes e os conceitos envolvidos na definição, gerenciamento e implantação de repositórios de componentes reusáveis, fundamentais na consolidação do processo de reuso. Novos papéis e responsabilidades envolvidos no processo de reuso são apresentados, além de exemplos de métricas a serem utilizadas com o intuito de auxiliar a medição dos benefícios proporcionados pelo reuso dentro de um processo já consolidado. O resultado desse trabalho é uma análise crítica em relação aos benefícios do reuso e os riscos associados à sua implementação no processo de desenvolvimento de software, considerandose os aspectos tecnológicos, humanos e econômicos envolvidos em cada tópico abordado ao longo do trabalho
Abstract: In a globalized world, the needs to release new systems to manage the large volume of information generated every day force a continuous search for new software development practices in order to handle this information. This is related to the needs to obtain quality and productivity improvements, as well as cost reduction in such development, because these are the main success factors of Information Technology companies. In this scenario, the component reuse in the software development process plays an important role in order to achieve these goals. This work presents the concepts around the context of a software development process based on reusable components. Different types of reuse are explained, as well as the concept of a reusable component and types of components inside an application domain. Components have different characteristics, are originated from different sources and carry on important details that should be analyzed during its documentation. All these aspects have influence on the reuse level of the components inside the project or the company. Some technologies that promote the component reuse and the concepts involved in the definition, management and implementation of reusable software components, which are the basis to consolidate the reuse process, are presented. New roles and responsibilities involved in the reuse process are shown, and also some metrics used to help to measure the benefits due to a consolidated reuse process. The results of this work are a critical analysis about the reuse benefits and the risks associated to its implementation in the software development process, taking into account the technological, human and economic factors involved on each topic discussed along this work
Mestrado
Engenharia de Software
Mestre Profissional em Computação
Hobelsberger, Martin [Verfasser], and Reiner [Akademischer Betreuer] Dumke. "Reusability evaluation of component-based embedded automative software systems / Martin Hobelsberger. Betreuer: Reiner Dumke." Magdeburg : Universitätsbibliothek, 2012. http://d-nb.info/1053227736/34.
Full textTyan, Hung-ying. "Design, realization and evaluation of a component-based compositional software architecture for network simulation /." The Ohio State University, 2002. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=osu1486402544591791.
Full textKürsten, Jens. "A Generic Approach to Component-Level Evaluation in Information Retrieval." Doctoral thesis, Universitätsbibliothek Chemnitz, 2012. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:ch1-qucosa-96344.
Full textDas Forschungsgebiet Information Retrieval befasst sich mit Theorien und Modellen, die die Grundlage für jegliche Dienste bilden, die als Antwort auf ein formuliertes Informationsbedürfnis den Zugang zu oder einen Verweis auf entsprechende Elemente einer Dokumentsammlung ermöglichen. Die Qualität von Suchalgorithmen wird im Teilgebiet Information Retrieval Evaluation untersucht. Der klassische Ansatz für den empirischen Vergleich von Retrievalsystemen basiert auf dem Cranfield-Paradigma und nutzt einen spezifischen Korpus mit einer Menge von Beispielanfragen mit zugehörigen Relevanzbewertungen. Internationale Evaluationskampagnen, wie die Text Retrieval Conference, haben in den vergangenen zwei Jahrzehnten zu großen Fortschritten in der Methodik der empirischen Bewertung von Suchverfahren geführt. Der generelle Fokus dieses systembasierten Ansatzes liegt jedoch nach wie vor auf dem Vergleich der Gesamtsysteme, dass heißt die Systeme werden als Black Box betrachtet. In jüngster Zeit ist diese Evaluationsmethode vor allem aufgrund des Black-Box-Charakters des Untersuchungsgegenstandes in die Kritik geraten. Aktuelle Arbeiten fordern einen differenzierteren Blick in die einzelnen Systemeigenschaften, bzw. ihrer Komponenten. In der vorliegenden Arbeit wird ein generischer Ansatz zur komponentenbasierten Evaluation von Retrievalsystemen vorgestellt und empirisch untersucht. Der Fokus der vorliegenden Dissertation liegt deshalb auf zentralen Komponenten, die für die Bearbeitung klassischer Ad-Hoc Suchprobleme, wie dem Finden von Büchern zu einem bestimmten Thema in einer Menge von Bibliothekseinträgen, wichtig sind. Ein zentraler Ansatz der Arbeit ist die Weiterentwicklung des Xtrieval Frameworks mittels der Integration weitverbreiteter Retrievalsysteme mit dem Ziel der gegenseitigen Eliminierung systemspezifischer Schwächen. Herausragende Ergebnisse im internationalen Vergleich, für verschiedenste Suchprobleme, verdeutlichen sowohl das Potenzial des Ansatzes als auch die Flexibilität des Xtrieval Frameworks. Moderne Retrievalsysteme beinhalten zahlreiche Komponenten, die für die Lösung spezifischer Teilaufgaben im gesamten Retrievalprozess wichtig sind. Die hier vorgelegte Arbeit ermöglicht die genaue Betrachtung der einzelnen Komponenten des Ad-hoc Retrievals. Hierfür wird mit Xtrieval ein Framework dargestellt, welches ein breites Spektrum an Verfahren flexibel miteinander kombinieren lässt. Das System ist offen konzipiert und ermöglicht die Integration weiterer Verfahren sowie die Bearbeitung weiterer Retrievalaufgaben jenseits des Ad-hoc Retrieval. Damit wird die bislang in der Forschung verschiedentlich geforderte aber bislang nicht erfolgreich umgesetzte komponentenbasierte Evaluation von Retrievalverfahren ermöglicht. Mächtigkeit und Bedeutung dieser Evaluationsmöglichkeiten werden anhand ausgewählter Instanzen der Komponenten in einer empirischen Analyse mit über 13.000 Systemkonfigurationen gezeigt. Die Ergebnisse auf den vier untersuchten Ad-Hoc Testkollektionen sind vielfältig. So wurden beispielsweise systematische Fehler bestimmter Ranking-Modelle identifiziert und die theoretischen Zusammenhänge zwischen spezifischen Klassen dieser Modelle anhand empirischer Ergebnisse nachgewiesen. Der Maßstab des durchgeführten Experiments macht eine Analyse aller möglichen Einflüsse und Zusammenhänge zwischen den untersuchten Komponenten unmöglich. Daher werden die erzeugten empirischen Daten für weitere Studien öffentlich bereitgestellt
Caruana, Henrik. "Tachograph Software Test Tool : Development and evaluation of test automation regardingthe user interface component of the SE5000 tachograph." Thesis, KTH, Skolan för informations- och kommunikationsteknik (ICT), 2012. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-107775.
Full textThis thesis work describes the development of a program that tests a software component in the SE5000 tachograph and investigates if this test methodology and setup is worth further investigation. One of the products Stoneridge Electronics develop is the tachograph SE5000. A digital tachograph is an electronic system for recording driving and rest times for drivers and co-drivers of commercial vehicles. Vehicle speed, distance travelled and other system‐related parameters are also logged. Data is stored in a memory inside the unit and on driver ‐specific smart cards. The software of the SE5000 tachograph consists of several separate components that SE wishes to test separately on software level. By testing on software level the feedback loop is shortened and allows developers to catch possible bugs much earlier in the process. High test coverage is a clear sign of quality and is a reassuring for Stoneridge Electronics when the unit is tested and a function certificate is issued by the Swedish Transport Agency. The user interface component is responsible for delivering data in response to driver and vehicle input and stimulation. Previously the user interface testing has been performed on system level, i.e. software has been integrated with the hardware and the system has been put under test by using external interfaces of the target. The test execution time consumption is a problem when performing user interface tests on system level. It is the projects wish to be able to perform reliable automated testes at a software level in order to run the test on a regularly basis or at software change. It is also desirable to establish a great variety of tests that can be executed without huge time consumption. These test cases should be easy and quick to implement.
Toresson, Gabriel. "Documenting and Improving the Design of a Large-scale System." Thesis, Linköpings universitet, Programvara och system, 2019. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-157733.
Full textDavorka, Radaković. "Metadata-Supported Object-Oriented Extension of Dynamic Geometry SoftwareTI." Phd thesis, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu, Prirodno-matematički fakultet u Novom Sadu, 2019. https://www.cris.uns.ac.rs/record.jsf?recordId=111034&source=NDLTD&language=en.
Full textU današnje vreme softver za dinamičku geometriju (DGS) je široko prihvaćen kao alat za kreiranje i prezentovanje vizuelno bogatih interaktivnih nastavnih materijala i materijala za samostalno učenje, nazvanih dinamičkim crtežima. Kako je raslo prihvatanje softvera za dinamičku geometriju, tako je i rasla potreba da se oni proširuju, dodajući im novu semantiku i vizualne objekte. Razvili smo programsko okruženje za softver za dinamičku geometriju, SLGeometry, sa generičkim funkcionalnim jezikom i odgovarajućim evaluatorom izraza koji čini okruženje u kom su ugrađene specifične semantike u obliku koda označenog metapodacima. Ovo okruženje pretvara uobičajen evaluator stabla izraza u objektno orijentiran, te daje uputstva i primere za stvaranje interaktivnih objekata sa dinamičkim osobinama, koji sudeluju u optimizaciji izvršenja tokom izvođenja. Dok se drugi DGS-ovi temelje na čisto funkcionalnim evaluatorima izraza, naše rješenje ima prednosti jer je uopštenije, lako za implementaciju i pruža prirodan način navođenja osobina objekta u korisničkom interfejsu, minimizirajući kucanje i sintaksne greške. SLGeometry je implementirana u jeziku C# .NET Framework-a. Iako su atributi preferiran mehanizam, koji povezuje C# kôd sa deklarativnim informacijama, oni imaju određena ograničenja koja limitiraju njihovu primenu za predstavljanje složenih strukturiranih metapodataka. Razvijanjem infrastrukture metapodataka koja je nezavisna od atributa, uspeli smo prevladati ta ograničenja. Naše rešenje, predstavljeno u ovoj disertaciji, pruža proširivost: jednostavnim i složenim vrstama podataka, unarnim i binarnim operacijama, konverzijama tipova, funkcijama i vizuelnim objektima, omogućavajući time programerima da neprimetno dodaju nove osobine u SLGeometry implementirajući ih kao C# klase označene metapodacima.
Books on the topic "Component software – Evaluation"
Grigor'ev, Anatoliy, and Evgeniy Isaev. Methods and algorithms of data processing. ru: INFRA-M Academic Publishing LLC., 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/1032305.
Full textHirschman, Lynette, and Inderjeet Mani. Evaluation. Edited by Ruslan Mitkov. Oxford University Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199276349.013.0022.
Full text1935-, Lasker G. E., International Institute for Advanced Studies in Systems Research and Cybernetics., and International Conference on Systems Research, Informatics and Cybernetics (13th : 2001 : Baden-Baden, Germany), eds. Advances in database and expert systems: Data mining and data warehousing techniques, similarity search for reusable database components, performance assessment of learning algorithms, estimation of models for expert systems, complexity evaluation of software processes, multi-agent systems, multi-agent approach to coalition formation, communication between software agents in distributed information systems, expert systems for fault diagnosis, parameter modulated fractals generators, information management in Intranet and Extranet environments. Windsor, Ont: International Institute for Advanced Studies in Systems Research and Cybernetics, 2001.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Component software – Evaluation"
Barbier, Franck. "Web-Based COTS Component Evaluation." In COTS-Based Software Systems, 104–16. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24645-9_22.
Full textKunda, Douglas. "STACE: Social Technical Approach to COTS Software Evaluation." In Component-Based Software Quality, 64–84. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-45064-1_4.
Full textAldini, Alessandro, Flavio Corradini, and Marco Bernardo. "Component-Oriented Performance Evaluation." In A Process Algebraic Approach to Software Architecture Design, 203–38. London: Springer London, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-223-4_6.
Full textGrunske, Lars, Bernhard Kaiser, and Yiannis Papadopoulos. "Model-Driven Safety Evaluation with State-Event-Based Component Failure Annotations." In Component-Based Software Engineering, 33–48. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11424529_3.
Full textPurhonen, Anu. "Performance Evaluation Approaches for Software Architects." In Component-Based Software Development for Embedded Systems, 275–95. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11591962_14.
Full textKouchnarenko, Olga, and Jean-François Weber. "Decentralised Evaluation of Temporal Patterns over Component-Based Systems at Runtime." In Formal Aspects of Component Software, 108–26. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15317-9_7.
Full textKim, Haeng-Kon. "Evaluation and Certifications for Component Packages Software." In Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing, 209–20. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01203-7_18.
Full textGoedicke, Michael, and Torsten Meyer. "Design and Evaluation of Distributed Component-Oriented Software Systems." In Object-Oriented Technologys, 348–52. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/3-540-69687-3_71.
Full textBunse, Christian, Hans-Gerhard Gross, and Christian Peper. "Embedded System Construction – Evaluation of Model-Driven and Component-Based Development Approaches." In Models in Software Engineering, 66–77. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01648-6_8.
Full textGrunske, Lars. "Towards an Integration of Standard Component-Based Safety Evaluation Techniques with SaveCCM." In Quality of Software Architectures, 199–213. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11921998_17.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Component software – Evaluation"
CLOUGH, A. "Software component quality evaluation." In 8th Computing in Aerospace Conference. Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 1991. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.1991-3760.
Full textŠnajberk, Jaroslav, and Přemek Brada. "INTERACTIVE COMPONENT VISUALIZATION." In 6th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Software Approaches to Software Engineering. SCITEPRESS - Science and Technology Publications, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0003436902180225.
Full text"Nested Web Application Components Framework - A Comparison to Competing Software Component Models." In 8th International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Software Approaches to Software Engineering. SciTePress - Science and and Technology Publications, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0004421401490156.
Full textBanerjee, Prasenjit, and Anirban Sarkar. "Quality Evaluation Framework for Component Based Software." In the Second International Conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2905055.2905223.
Full textIchii, Makoto, Yasuhiro Hayase, Reishi Yokomori, Tetsuo Yamamoto, and Katsuro Inoue. "Software component recommendation using collaborative filtering." In 2009 ICSE Workshop on Search-Driven Development-Users, Infrastructure, Tools and Evaluation (SUITE). IEEE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/suite.2009.5070014.
Full text"Identification of Software Product Line Component Services." In International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering. SciTePress - Science and and Technology Publications, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.5220/0001961300450056.
Full textKaur, Kulbir, and Harshpreet Singh. "PROMETHEE based component evaluation and selection for Component Based Software Engineering." In 2014 International Conference on Advanced Communication, Control and Computing Technologies (ICACCCT). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icaccct.2014.7019336.
Full textAlvaro, Alexandre, Eduardo Santana De Almeida, and Silvio Lemos Meira. "A Software Component Quality Model: A Preliminary Evaluation." In Proceedings. 32nd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA). IEEE, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/euromicro.2006.13.
Full textKaur, Loveleen. "Software component selection using code metrics based evaluation." In 2015 Annual IEEE India Conference (INDICON). IEEE, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/indicon.2015.7443322.
Full textLand, Rikard, Alexandre Alvaro, and Ivica Crnkovic. "Towards Efficient Software Component Evaluation: An Examination of Component Selection and Certification." In 2008 34th Euromicro Conference Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA). IEEE, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/seaa.2008.76.
Full text