Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Compatibility effects / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Compatibility effects.

Journal articles on the topic 'Compatibility effects'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 9 March 2023

Last updated: 10 March 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Compatibility effects.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Galantucci, Bruno, Carol A. Fowler, and Louis Goldstein. "Perceptuomotor compatibility effects in speech." Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71, no. 5 (July 2009): 1138–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/app.71.5.1138.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

BaveLier, Daphne, Christine Deruelle, and Jason Proksch. "Positive and negative compatibility effects." Perception & Psychophysics 62, no. 1 (January 2000): 100–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/bf03212064.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Pulmannová, Sylvia. "Compatibility and decompositions of effects." Journal of Mathematical Physics 43, no. 5 (2002): 2817. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1462857.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Bossert, Magdalena, Aleksandra Kaurin, Franzis Preckel, and Christian Frings. "Response-compatibility effects in children." European Journal of Developmental Psychology 11, no. 1 (August 2013): 90–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2013.819286.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Rasch, Alexander. "Compatibility, network effects, and collusion." Economics Letters 151 (February 2017): 39–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2016.11.031.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Kunde, Wilfried, Jochen Müsseler, and Herbert Heuer. "Spatial Compatibility Effects With Tool Use." Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49, no. 4 (August 2007): 661–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1518/001872007x215737.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Woeckener, Bernd. "Network Effects, Compatibility Decisions, and Monopolization." Journal of Contextual Economics – Schmollers Jahrbuch 119, no. 1 (January 1, 1999): 23–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.3790/schm.119.1.23.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Verbruggen, Frederick, Baptist Liefooghe, Wim Notebaert, and André Vandierendonck. "Effects of stimulus–stimulus compatibility and stimulus–response compatibility on response inhibition." Acta Psychologica 120, no. 3 (November 2005): 307–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.05.003.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Vršič, S., B. Pulko, and L. Kocsis. "Effects of rootstock genotypes on compatibility, biomass, and the yield of Welschriesling." Horticultural Science 43, No. 2 (May 23, 2016): 92–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/141/2015-hortsci.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Qi, Ying, Xiangyang Wang, Yujia Li, Gongyi Zhang, and Huiqi Jin. "The effects of inter-organizational compatibility on knowledge transfer in cross-border M&As." Management Decision 59, no. 9 (January 8, 2021): 2123–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/md-03-2020-0349.

Full text

Abstract:

PurposeThe study adopts congruence theory to explore the structure of inter-organizational compatibility and its structural effects on knowledge transfer in cross-border merger and acquisitions (M&As).Design/methodology/approachThis paper built a moderated-mediation model that presented the relationship between inter-organizational compatibility and knowledge transfer. Regression analysis was conducted with 182 samples from China to examine the model and hypotheses.FindingsThe results indicate that inter-organizational compatibility is a four-dimensional construct comprising culture, strategy, routine and knowledge. Additionally, inter-organizational compatibility has structural effects on knowledge transfer. Specifically, routine compatibility mediates the relationships between cultural compatibility and knowledge transfer and between strategic compatibility and knowledge transfer. Moreover, the mediating roles are moderated by knowledge compatibility.Originality/valueThis study updates the construct and provides a comprehensive and fresh understanding of inter-organizational compatibility. Additionally, it presents the structural effects of inter-organizational compatibility on knowledge transfer.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Bechler, Christopher J., and Jonathan Levav. "Compatibility effects in the perception of dispersion." Cognition 225 (August 2022): 105166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105166.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Vallesi, Antonino, Yael Weisblatt, Carlo Semenza, and Samuel Shaki. "Cultural modulations of space–time compatibility effects." Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 21, no. 3 (October 26, 2013): 666–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0540-y.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Liu, Yanfang, and Kan Zhang. "The Compatibility Effects between Cue and Stimulus." Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 44, no. 1 (July 2000): 295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193120004400192.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Tlauka, Michael, and Frank P. McKenna. "Hierarchical Knowledge Influences Stimulus-Response Compatibility Effects." Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 53, no. 1 (February 1, 2000): 85–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/027249800390682.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Hommel, Bernhard. "S-R Compatibility Effects Without Response Uncertainty." Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A 49, no. 3 (August 1, 1996): 546–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/027249896392496.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Hommel, Bernhard. "S-R Compatibility Effects without Response Uncertainty." Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 49, no. 3 (August 1996): 546–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713755643.

Full text

Abstract:

Five experiments investigated whether cognitively based spatial S-R correspondence effects or “compatibility” effects can occur in simple reaction time (SRT) tasks and if so, which factors might be responsible for their occurrence and size. In Experiment 1, responses were cued before each trial, but made only after presentation of a Go signal. There were considerably faster responses with spatial correspondence of Go signal and response, demonstrating that response certainty does not prevent a compatibility effect. Experiment 2, a SRT task with “extra” trials requiring responses with the same or the opposite hand, indicated a major determinant of this effect to be the keeping of two task-relevant responses in a state of readiness. Experiment 3 provided preliminary evidence for “inertia” effects—that is, for stronger correspondence effects with frequent than with infrequent alternations between left-hand and right-hand blocks. Experiment 4 showed that correspondence effects can be obtained by using a within-hand response repertoire. Experiment 5, a replication of Experiment 3 with within-hand responses, found further evidence for inertia effects. For all experiments, reaction time distribution analyses were carried out to gain insight into the temporal dynamics of correspondence effects. Altogether the results strongly suggest that most if not all correspondence effects had a cognitive rather than an anatomical origin. This raises some doubts about conclusions from prior attempts to measure interhemispheric transmission costs by means of SRT tasks.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Tlauka, Michael, and Frank P. McKenna. "Hierarchical Knowledge Influences Stimulus-Response Compatibility Effects." Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 53, no. 1 (February 2000): 85–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713755880.

Full text

Abstract:

The influence of spatial stimulus grouping on stimulus-response compatibility effects was investigated in three experiments. Stimuli were grouped as part of a superordinate unit BY (1) perceptually organizing them (Experiment 1), (2) organizing them on the basis of semantic links (Experiment 2), or (3) arbitrary links (Experiment 3). In some instances the arrangement of the stimuli resulted in a conflict between two types of spatial relationship: one between stimulus and response and the other between superordinate unit and response. The experiments indicated that it was the latter relationship that mainly determined performance in the experiments. Reaction time analyses showed that responses were fastest if they spatially corresponded to the relative location of the superordinate unit of which the stimulus was part. The results are discussed with reference to hierarchical accounts of coding stimulus information.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

OBER, CAROLE, JOE LEIGH SIMPSON, MICHAEL WARD, RUTA M. RADVANY, RHONDA ANDERSEN, SHERMAN ELIAS, and RUDY SABBAGHA. "Prenatal Effects of Maternal-Fetal HLA Compatibility." Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 43, no. 6 (June 1988): 354–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006254-198843060-00015.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Lyman, Donald J. "Bulk and Surface Effects on Blood Compatibility." Journal of Bioactive and Compatible Polymers 6, no. 3 (July 1991): 283–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/088391159100600307.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Müsseler, Jochen, Wilfried Kunde, Detlef Gausepohl, and Herbert Heuer. "Does a tool eliminate spatial compatibility effects?" European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 20, no. 2 (March 2008): 211–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09541440701275815.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

OBER, CAROLE, JOE LEIGH SIMPSON, MICHAEL WARD, RUTA M. RADVANY, RHONDA ANDERSEN, SHERMAN ELIAS, and RUDY SABBAGHA. "Prenatal Effects of Maternal-Fetal HLA Compatibility." Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey 43, no. 6 (June 1988): 354–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006254-198806000-00015.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Janczyk, Markus, Roland Pfister, and Wilfried Kunde. "On the Persistence of Tool-Based Compatibility Effects." Zeitschrift für Psychologie 220, no. 1 (January 2012): 16–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000086.

Full text

Abstract:

Using tools, such as simple levers, makes specific demands on the motor system. Two related performance decrements have been reported: The costs that arise when required tool movements and movements of the operating hand are spatially incompatible (hand-tool compatibility), and the costs that arise when relevant stimuli and tool movements are spatially incompatible (stimulus-tool compatibility). We performed two experiments to test the boundary conditions of both effects. Experiment 1 revealed a strong hand-tool compatibility effect despite visual occlusion of the hand and instructions to ignore hand movements. Experiment 2 revealed influences of stimulus-tool compatibility despite instructions to ignore the tool and to pay attention to the operating hand alone. These results suggest that lever movements of the type studied here become automatically represented and constrain motor performance.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

TSENG, FAN-CHEN, and KUANG-CHENG ANDY WANG. "COMPATIBILITY STRATEGIES FOR AN ASYMMETRIC DUOPOLY CONSIDERING NETWORK EFFECTS AND MARKET SHARES." International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 08, no. 04 (December 2011): 615–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0219877011002581.

Full text

Abstract:

The network effect is a key factor influencing the development of e-business and technological innovation. At the same time, compatibility decisions can determine the success or failure of businesses and technologies. This study explores the compatibility strategies in the context of network effects using a two-stage game-theoretical model for a duopoly. In the first stage, two firms make their compatibility decisions, and in the second stage, two firms are engaged in Bertrand price competition. Major findings are (1) other things being fixed, two firms are more likely to be compatible with each other when they have similar market shares, (2) the compatibility decisions of firms will not be influenced by consumers' switching costs, (3) the order of their compatibility decisions will not change the resulting equilibrium, and (4) based on firms' compatibility decisions, the Bertrand price competition may still lead to market failure, necessitating governmental intervention or regulations.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Ghozlan, Aline. "Stimulus-Response Compatibility and Position of the Hands: Nonadditive Effects." Perceptual and Motor Skills 86, no. 3 (June 1998): 843–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1998.86.3.843.

Full text

Abstract:

An experiment was conducted using a two-choice stimulus-response compatibility task factorially combined with position of the hands. Subjects responded to a visual target word ( Left or Right) by pressing on the left or the right key depending on the compatible or incompatible assignment and performed the task with the hands uncrossed or crossed. The effects of Stimulus-response compatibility and Position of hands were not additive. Moreover, no effect of compatibility occurred in the crossed-band condition. These findings are consistent with the predictions derived from a recent hypothesis assuming that in some particular experimental conditions the presentation of the stimulus will activate two automatic responses. The two stimulus-response compatibility mappings related to these two automatic responses have been shown to be positively or negatively correlated depending on the factorial combination of Stimulus-Response Compatibility and Position of Hands. As a consequence the effects of the two factors theoretically cannot be additive. This assumption accounts for the present results.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Nadine Stephan, Denise, and Iring Koch. "Tactile Stimuli Increase Effects of Modality Compatibility in Task Switching." Experimental Psychology 62, no. 4 (September 2015): 276–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000291.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract. Modality compatibility refers to the similarity of stimulus modality and modality of response-related sensory consequences. Previous dual-task studies found increased switch costs for modality incompatible tasks (auditory-manual/visual-vocal) compared to modality compatible tasks (auditory-vocal/visual-manual). The present task-switching study further examined modality compatibility and investigated vibrotactile stimulation as a novel alternative to visual stimulation. Interestingly, a stronger modality compatibility effect on switch costs was revealed for the group with tactile-auditory stimulation compared to the visual-auditory stimulation group. We suggest that the modality compatibility effect is based on crosstalk of central processing codes due to ideomotor “backward” linkages between the anticipated response effects and the stimuli indicating this response. This crosstalk is increased in the tactile-auditory stimulus group compared to the visual-auditory stimulus group due to a higher degree of ideomotor-compatibility in the tactile-manual tasks. Since crosstalk arises between tasks, performance is only affected in task switching and not in single tasks.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Guadagnoli, Mark A., and T. Gilmour Reeve. "Stimulus-Response Compatibility and Motor-Programming Effects: A Test of Theoretical Accounts of Compatibility." Human Performance 7, no. 4 (December 1994): 291–304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup0704_4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Zhou, Liang, Mengqi Shangguan, Lianzi Xing, Haiyang Yu, Hailing Wang, Michael J. Hove, and Shouxin Li. "Separating the effects of stimulus-gravity compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on visuomotor synchronization." Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 46, no. 4 (April 2020): 405–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000721.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Janczyk, Markus, Aiping Xiong, and Robert W. Proctor. "Stimulus-Response and Response-Effect Compatibility With Touchless Gestures and Moving Action Effects." Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 61, no. 8 (March 7, 2019): 1297–314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720819831814.

Full text

Abstract:

Objective: To determine whether response-effect (R-E) compatibility or stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility is more critical for touchless gesture responses. Background: Content on displays can be moved in the same direction (S-R incompatible but R-E compatible) or opposite direction (S-R compatible but R-E incompatible) as the touchless gesture that produces the movement. Previous studies suggested that it is easier to produce a button-press response when it is R-E compatible (and S-R incompatible). However, whether this R-E compatibility effect also occurs for touchless gesture responses is unknown. Method: Experiments 1 and 2 employed an R-E compatibility manipulation in which participants made responses with an upward or downward touchless gesture that resulted in the display content moving in the same (compatible) or opposite (incompatible) direction. Experiment 3 employed an S-R compatibility manipulation in which the stimulus occurred at the upper or lower location on the screen. Results: Overall, only negligible influences of R-E compatibility on performing the touchless gestures were observed (in contrast to button-press responses), whereas S-R compatibility heavily affected the gestural responses. Conclusion: The R-E compatibility obtained in many previous studies with various types of responses appears not to hold for touchless gestures as responses. Application: The results suggest that in the design of touchless interfaces, unique factors may contribute to determining which mappings of gesture and display movements are preferred by users.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Böffel, C., and J. Müsseler. "No evidence for automatic response activation with target onset in the avatar-compatibility task." Memory & Cognition 48, no. 7 (June 11, 2020): 1249–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01052-2.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract When people take the perspective of an avatar and perform a stimulus-response compatibility task, they generally show the same compatibility effects that are expected from the avatar’s position instead of their own. In this study, we investigated if these effects are caused by automatic response activation, a concept featured in dual-route models of stimulus-response compatibility. In two experiments we asked 24 participants each to perform a compatibility task from an avatar’s point of view. We introduced a delay between the presentation of the target and the avatar in half of the trials so that the participants had to wait until the avatar appeared to select the correct response. Because the automatic response activation is known to decay quickly, its influence is eliminated in this condition. In contrast to the prediction by the automatic response activation account, we observed a larger compatibility effect in the delayed condition with orthogonal (Experiment 1) and parallel (Experiment 2) stimulus-response pairings. Additionally, distributional analyses of the compatibility effects did not support the automaticity predictions. We conclude that these results call into question the role of automatic response activation for spatial compatibility in general and perspective-based compatibility effects in particular.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

THERON, A., C. COUSTAU, A. ROGNON, S. GOURBIÈRE, and M. S. BLOUIN. "Effects of laboratory culture on compatibility between snails and schistosomes." Parasitology 135, no. 10 (August 14, 2008): 1179–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0031182008004745.

Full text

Abstract:

SUMMARYThe genetic control of compatibility between laboratory strains of schistosomes and their snail hosts has been studied intensively since the 1970s. These studies show (1) a bewildering array of genotype-by-genotype interactions – compatibility between one pair of strains rarely predicts compatibility with other strains, and (2) evidence for a variety of (sometimes conflicting) genetic mechanisms. Why do we observe such variable and conflicting results? One possibility is that it is partly an artifact of the use of laboratory strains that have been in culture for many years and are often inbred. Here we show that results of compatibility trials between snails and schistosomes – all derived from the same natural population – depend very much on whether one uses laboratory-cultured or field-collected individuals. Explanations include environmental effects of the lab on either host or parasite, and genetic changes in either host or parasite during laboratory culture. One intriguing possibility is that genetic bottlenecks during laboratory culture cause the random fixation of alleles at highly polymorphic loci that control the matched/mismatched status of hosts and parasites. We show that a simple model of phenotype matching could produce dose response curves that look very similar to empirical observations. Such a model would explain much of the genotype-by-genotype interaction in compatibility observed among strains.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Berthet, Vincent, Jean-Luc Kop, and Sid Kouider. "Response Interference in Compatibility Tasks." Experimental Psychology 58, no. 4 (February 1, 2011): 257–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000092.

Full text

Abstract:

Affective priming (AP) is a well-established phenomenon in which performance to a valenced target is typically better when it is preceded by an affectively congruent prime than when it is preceded by an incongruent prime. Several studies have emphasized a strong similarity between AP and Stroop suggesting that both are driven by response interference. The present study investigated this hypothesis by testing whether a general prediction of the response interference model was verified in the two tasks. This prediction refers to target strength and states that the size of compatibility effects should increase as the strength of the relevant information decreases. In four experiments, we show that this general prediction of the response interference model was verified in AP and Stroop when the strength of the relevant information was manipulated at the perceptual level (Experiments 1 and 2), while the opposite pattern was observed when this variable was manipulated at the semantic level (Experiments 3 and 4). While the results do not undermine the hypothesis that AP and Stroop effects are governed by response interference, they suggest that the model should be refined in order to account for differential effects of target strength in compatibility tasks.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Giammarco, Maria, Sandra J. Thomson, and Scott Watter. "Dual-task backward compatibility effects are episodically mediated." Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 78, no. 2 (November 16, 2015): 520–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-015-0998-y.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Hartley, Alan A., François Maquestiaux, Sara B. Festini, Kathryn Frazier, and Patricia J. Krimmer. "Backward compatibility effects in younger and older adults." Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 78, no. 5 (May 4, 2016): 1337–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1113-8.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Ghaffarvand Mokari, Payam, Adamantios Gafos, and Daniel Williams. "Perceptuomotor compatibility effects in vowels: Beyond phonemic identity." Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 82, no. 5 (March 31, 2020): 2751–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13414-020-02014-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

KATO, Yuichiro, Hiroshi ENDO, and Tomohiro KIZUKA. "Effects of Stimulus-Response Compatibility on Motor Programming." Biomechanisms 19 (2008): 35–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.3951/biomechanisms.19.35.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Miller, Jeff, Stephen G. Atkins, and Fenna Van Nes. "Compatibility effects based on stimulus and response numerosity." Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12, no. 2 (April 2005): 265–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/bf03196370.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Kong, Feng, and Xuqun You. "Space-Time Compatibility Effects in the Auditory Modality." Experimental Psychology 59, no. 2 (November 1, 2012): 82–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000129.

Full text

Abstract:

Previous research suggests that past and future temporal concepts are spatially represented from left to right along a mental line. And these concepts can both prime motor responses to left or right space and direct visual spatial attention. The present study aimed at investigating the nature of this space-time conceptual metaphor in different auditory tasks. In the first experiment, subjects categorized time-related words (past or future) that were presented binaurally. In the second experiment, subjects detected left-ear or right-ear targets following time-related words. The similar space-time compatibility effects were found in these two experiments. Our results demonstrate that the activation of temporal concepts can both prime motor responses to left or right space and influence the orientation of auditory spatial attention, suggesting that the modality of the stimulus input is unimportant for the left-right mapping of time. These results are explained by the “intermediate coding” account.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Carswell, C. Melody. "Graphical Information Processing: The Effects of Proximity Compatibility." Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting 34, no. 19 (October 1990): 1494–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193129003401916.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Gandal, N. "Compatibility, Standardization, and Network Effects: Some Policy Implications." Oxford Review of Economic Policy 18, no. 1 (March 1, 2002): 80–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/18.1.80.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Occelli, Valeria, Charles Spence, and Massimiliano Zampini. "Compatibility effects between sound frequency and tactile elevation." NeuroReport 20, no. 8 (May 2009): 793–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/wnr.0b013e32832b8069.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Giammarco, M., S. Thomson, and S. Watter. "Dual-task backward compatibility effects are episodically mediated." Journal of Vision 14, no. 10 (August 22, 2014): 525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/14.10.525.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Auh, Seigyoung, and Michael D. Johnson. "Compatibility effects in evaluations of satisfaction and loyalty." Journal of Economic Psychology 26, no. 1 (February 2005): 35–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2003.10.002.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Field, S. B., and A. C. Upton. "Non-stochastic Effects: Compatibility with Present ICRP Recommendations." International Journal of Radiation Biology and Related Studies in Physics, Chemistry and Medicine 48, no. 1 (January 1985): 81–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09553008514551091.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

KURATOMI, Kei, and Kazuhito YOSHIZAKI. "Conflict frequency and stimulus location modulate compatibility effects." Proceedings of the Annual Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association 75 (September 15, 2011): 3AM079. http://dx.doi.org/10.4992/pacjpa.75.0_3am079.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Lamberts, Koen. "Towards a similarity-based account of compatibility effects." Psychological Research 56, no. 3 (April 1994): 136–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00419700.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

de Jong, Ritske. "Strategical determinants of compatibility effects with task uncertainty." Acta Psychologica 88, no. 3 (April 1995): 187–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(94)e0067-p.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

MÜSSELER, JOCHEN, GISA ASCHERSLEBEN, KATRIN ARNING, and ROBERT W. PROCTOR. "Reversed effects of spatial compatibility in natural scenes." American Journal of Psychology 122, no. 3 (October 1, 2009): 325–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/27784406.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Effects of spatial stimulus–response compatibility are often attributed to automatic position-based activation of the response elicited by a stimulus. Three experiments examined this assumption in natural scenes. In Experiments 1 and 2, participants performed simulated driving, and a person appeared periodically on either side of the road. Participants were to turn toward a person calling a taxi and away from a person carelessly entering the street. The spatially incompatible response was faster than the compatible response, but neutral stimuli showed a typical benefit for spatially compatible responses. Placing the people further in the visual periphery eliminated the advantage for the incompatible response and showed an advantage for the compatible response. In Experiment 3, participants made left–right joystick responses to a vicious dog or puppy in a walking scenario. Instructions were to avoid the vicious dog and approach the puppy or vice versa. Results again showed an advantage for the spatially incompatible response. Thus, the typically observed advantage of spatially compatible responses was reversed for dangerous situations in natural scenes.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Scerrati, Elisa, Roberto Nicoletti, Sandro Rubichi, Claudia Scorolli, and Luisa Lugli. "Compatibility effects with destination and origin of motion." PLOS ONE 18, no. 2 (February 17, 2023): e0281829. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281829.

Full text

Abstract:

Previous studies highlighted spatial compatibility effects other than those strictly arising from stimulus-response locations. In particular, the so-called Destination Compatibility (DC) effect refers to faster responses for dynamic (i.e., moving) stimuli the end point of which is spatially compatible with the response key. Four experiments examined whether the DC effect also occurs with static visual stimuli symbolically representing either motion destination alone (Experiment 1a), or both motion origin and destination (Experiments 1b, 2a, and 2b). Overall, our results are consistent in showing a DC effect; most importantly, the present findings reveal a predominance of the effect of destination of motion over that of origin, even when both the starting and ending positions of the stimulus are symbolically represented and participants are instructed to respond according to motion origin. This finding suggests that the DC effect is independent from other stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) effects.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Ansorge, Ulrich. "Spatial Simon effects and compatibility effects induced by observed gaze direction." Visual Cognition 10, no. 3 (April 2003): 363–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13506280244000122.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

van der Schoot, Menno, Sander A. Los, Fren T. Y. Smulders, and Albert Kok. "Effects of Mixed versus Blocked Design on Stimulus Evaluation: Combining Underadditive Effects." Perceptual and Motor Skills 97, no. 1 (August 2003): 45–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.2003.97.1.45.

Full text

Abstract:

According to the asynchronous discrete coding model of Miller, two manipulations should display underadditive effects on reaction time if they slow down noncontingent stages associated with the processing of two separable dimensions of a stimulus. Under additive effects are also predicted by a dual route model when a task variable is factorially varied with design type (mixed vs blocked). Interpretations of both underadditive effects and their combination were evaluated. Intact and degraded stimuli were presented to 18 young adults either in a single block (mixed) or in separate blocks (blocked). Spatial stimulus-response (S-R) compatibility was manipulated in all conditions. Stimulus degradation and S-R compatibility interacted underadditively, but only in blocked presentations. Both interpretations of underadditive effects were supported. Eye-movement registrations provided additional support for the alternative routes model.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!