Academic literature on the topic 'Comparison assessment models'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Comparison assessment models.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Comparison assessment models"
Gibson, Gavin J., George Streftaris, and David Thong. "Comparison and Assessment of Epidemic Models." Statistical Science 33, no. 1 (February 2018): 19–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/17-sts615.
Full textCristescu, Marian Pompiliu, Eduard Alexandru Stoica, and Laurenţiu Vasile Ciovică. "The Comparison of Software Reliability Assessment Models." Procedia Economics and Finance 27 (2015): 669–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(15)01047-3.
Full textShinn, Mark R., Sylvia Rosenfield, and Nancy Knutson. "Curriculum-Based Assessment: A Comparison of Models." School Psychology Review 18, no. 3 (September 1, 1989): 299–316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02796015.1989.12085428.
Full textVaššová, D. "Comparison of rainfall-runoff models for design discharge assessment in a small ungauged catchment." Soil and Water Research 8, No. 1 (February 6, 2013): 26–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/36/2012-swr.
Full textBaleva, Milena V. "SELF AND OTHER: ASSESSMENT AND SOCIAL COMPARISON MODELS." RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. Series Psychology. Pedagogics. Education, no. 1 (2020): 54–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.28995/2073-6398-2020-1-54-76.
Full textFloros, Georgios D., Ariadni Stogiannidou, Ioannis Giouzepas, and Georgios D. Garyfallos. "Comparison of Alternate Personality Models in Psychopathology Assessment." Psychological Reports 115, no. 2 (October 2014): 499–514. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/02.03.pr0.115c21z0.
Full textPanchal, S., M. Ennis, H. Yee, V. Contiga, and L. J. Bordeleau. "A comparison of BRCA1 and BRCA2 risk assessment models." Journal of Clinical Oncology 24, no. 18_suppl (June 20, 2006): 10034. http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.10034.
Full textde Ruiter, Marleen C., Philip J. Ward, James E. Daniell, and Jeroen C. J. H. Aerts. "Review Article: A comparison of flood and earthquake vulnerability assessment indicators." Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 17, no. 7 (July 20, 2017): 1231–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/nhess-17-1231-2017.
Full textZhang, Juan, James F. Campbell, Donald C. Sweeney II, and Andrea C. Hupman. "Energy consumption models for delivery drones: A comparison and assessment." Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 90 (January 2021): 102668. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102668.
Full textGoineau, Sonia, and Vincent Castagné. "Comparison of three preclinical models for nausea and vomiting assessment." Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods 82 (November 2016): 45–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vascn.2016.07.006.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Comparison assessment models"
Patil, Sumeet Rajshekhar. "Identification, Application, and Comparison of Sensitivity Analysis Methods for Food Safety Risk Assessment Models." NCSU, 2001. http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/theses/available/etd-20011206-174616.
Full textIdentification and qualitative comparison of sensitivity analysis methods that have been used across various disciplines, and that merit consideration for application to food safety risk assessment models are presented in this paper. Sensitivity analysis can help in identifying critical control points, prioritizing additional data collection or research, and verifying and validating a model. Ten sensitivity analysis methods, including four mathematical methods, five statistical methods and one graphical method, are identified. Application of these methods was also illustrated with the examples from various fields. These methods were compared on the basis of their applicability to different types of models, computational issues such as initial data requirement, time requirement, and complexity of their application, representation of the sensitivity, and the specific uses of these methods. No one method is clearly best for food safety risk models. In general, the use of two or more methods may be needed to increase confidence on the rank ordering of key inputs.To identify specific issues with respect to the application to a typical food safety risk model, the sensitivity analysis methods were applied to the risk assessment model of the public health impact of vibrio Parahaemolyticus (the Vp model). The Vp model was modified so that proper sensitivity analysis can be done on independent inputs. The results of the sensitivity analyses were interpreted and discussed in detail. The rank ordering of key inputs was reasonably similar for most of the methods. For example, five of the seven methods ranked water temperature, the number of oysters per meal, and a new input IUR in the top three. Time on water and an input IG were identified as the least important inputs by six methods.
Plevrakis, Viktor. "Comparison of risk assessment methods for polluted soils in Sweden, Norway and Denmark." Thesis, Stockholms universitet, Institutionen för naturgeografi och kvartärgeologi (INK), 2014. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-109376.
Full textNemeth, Lyle John. "A Comparison of Risk Assessment Models for Pipe Replacement and Rehabilitation in a Water Distribution System." DigitalCommons@CalPoly, 2016. https://digitalcommons.calpoly.edu/theses/1599.
Full textWesterberg, Erik. "AI-based Age Estimation using X-ray Hand Images : A comparison of Object Detection and Deep Learning models." Thesis, Blekinge Tekniska Högskola, Fakulteten för datavetenskaper, 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:bth-19598.
Full textPresentationen gjordes online via Zoom.
Corti, Rachele. "Benchmarking the ability of different stock-assessment models to capture the highly-fluctuating dynamics of small pelagics." Master's thesis, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, 2017.
Find full textMhlongo, Nanikie Charity, and n/a. "Competency-Based assessment in Australia - does it work?" University of Canberra. Education and Community Studies, 2002. http://erl.canberra.edu.au./public/adt-AUC20050530.094237.
Full textChee, Yenlai. "Remote sensing analysis of cratered surfaces Mars landing hazard assessment, comparison to terrestrial crater analogs, and Mars crater dating models /." To access this resource online via ProQuest Dissertations and Theses @ UTEP, 2007. http://0-proquest.umi.com.lib.utep.edu/login?COPT=REJTPTU0YmImSU5UPTAmVkVSPTI=&clientId=2515.
Full textNegretto, Giacomo. "The impact of spatial representation on flood hazard assessment: a comparison between 1D, quasi-2D and fully 2D hydrodynamic models of Rio Marano (Rimini)." Master's thesis, Alma Mater Studiorum - Università di Bologna, 2019. http://amslaurea.unibo.it/17600/.
Full textShen, Hui. "Model comparison and assessment by cross validation." Thesis, University of British Columbia, 2008. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/1286.
Full textPeterson, Viktor, and Zihao Wang. "Cross-comparison of Non-Linear Seismic Assessment Methods for Unreinforced Masonry Structures in Groningen." Thesis, KTH, Betongbyggnad, 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-289386.
Full textBooks on the topic "Comparison assessment models"
Roelen, A. L. C. Causal risk models of air transport: Comparison of user needs and model capabilities. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2008.
Find full textRoelen, A. L. C. Causal risk models of air transport: Comparison of user needs and model capabilities. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2008.
Find full textRoelen, A. L. C. Causal risk models of air transport: Comparison of user needs and model capabilities. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2008.
Find full textRoelen, A. L. C. Causal risk models of air transport: Comparison of user needs and model capabilities. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 2008.
Find full textGable, Jim. Sockeye stock composition estimates for Fraser River First Nations catches (1989 to 1995): A comparison between run reconstruction models and scale-based discriminant function models. Vancouver, B.C: Pacific Salmon Commission, 1998.
Find full textGable, Jim. A comparison of estimates of First Nations catches of Fraser River sockeye salmon from 1996 to 1999 by scale-based discriminant function models and run reconstruction models. Vancouver, B.C: Pacific Salmon Commission, 2002.
Find full textClaus, Iris. The output gap: Measurement, comparisons and assessment. Wellington, N.Z: Reserve Bank of New Zealand, 2000.
Find full textD, Delaney Harold, ed. Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth Pub. Co., 1990.
Find full textD, Delaney Harold, ed. Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. 2nd ed. Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2004.
Find full textD, Delaney Harold, ed. Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Comparison assessment models"
Bolfarine, Heleno, Mário de Castro, and Manuel Galea. "Model Checking and Influence Assessment." In Regression Models for the Comparison of Measurement Methods, 27–35. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57935-7_4.
Full textSemenov, Mikhail, and Daulet Smagulov. "Copula Models Comparison for Portfolio Risk Assessment." In Global Economics and Management: Transition to Economy 4.0, 91–102. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26284-6_9.
Full textMcArthur, David L. "A Comparison of Models for Measuring Achievement." In Alternative Approaches to the Assessment of Achievement, 249–65. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1987. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-3257-9_9.
Full textMandal, Sujit, and Subrata Mondal. "Comparison Between Statistical Models: A Review and Evaluation." In Statistical Approaches for Landslide Susceptibility Assessment and Prediction, 181–89. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-93897-4_8.
Full textWade, P. R. "A comparison of statistical methods for fitting population models to data." In Marine Mammal Survey and Assessment Methods, 249–70. London: CRC Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003211167-23.
Full textRøed, Lars Petter, Bruce Hackett, Bjørn Gjevik, and Lars Ingolf Eide. "A review of the Metocean Modeling Project (MOMOP) Part 1 : Model comparison study." In Quantitative Skill Assessment for Coastal Ocean Models, 285–305. Washington, D. C.: American Geophysical Union, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/ce047p0285.
Full textCognet, B., J. P. Pernot, L. Rivest, C. Danjou, T. Wuest, H. Kärkkäinen, and M. Lafleur. "Towards a Novel Comparison Framework of Digital Maturity Assessment Models." In IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 58–71. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42250-9_6.
Full textMoya-Anegón, Félix, Vicente P. Guerrero-Bote, and Estefanía Herrán-Páez. "Cross-National Comparison of Open Access Models: A Cost/Benefit Analysis." In Evaluative Informetrics: The Art of Metrics-Based Research Assessment, 309–25. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47665-6_14.
Full textRosa, Paolo, Claudio Sassanelli, and Sergio Terzi. "Circular Business Models Identification." In New Business Models for the Reuse of Secondary Resources from WEEEs, 9–16. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74886-9_2.
Full textWu, Cheng-Chung, and Po-Sheng Ko. "Comparison of Predictive Models for the Mortgage Behaviours Assessment System of Default and Prepayment." In Communications in Computer and Information Science, 510–22. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23062-2_76.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Comparison assessment models"
Woollam, Richard Charles, and Sandra Hernandez. "Assessment and comparison of CO2 corrosion predicition models." In SPE International Oilfield Corrosion Symposium. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/100673-ms.
Full textChongjin Xie and L. Moller. "Comparison and assessment of different polarization mode dispersion models." In 2005 Optical Fiber Communications Conference Technical Digest. IEEE, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ofc.2005.192801.
Full textOboudi, M. H., Nemat Talebi, and Maryam Moradnejad. "Comparison Models of DFIG for Stability Assessment of Wind Farms." In 2012 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC). IEEE, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/appeec.2012.6307110.
Full textDeng, Biao, Huadong Guo, Changlin Wang, and Yueping Nie. "A comparison study on SPOT5 image fusion and quality assessment." In Geoinformatics 2008 and Joint Conference on GIS and Built environment: Advanced Spatial Data Models and Analyses, edited by Lin Liu, Xia Li, Kai Liu, and Xinchang Zhang. SPIE, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.813135.
Full textPan, Jie, Cibby Pulikkaseril, Luke Stewart, and Sorin Tibuleac. "Comparison of ROADM filter shape models for accurate transmission penalty assessment." In 2016 IEEE Photonics Conference (IPC). IEEE, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ipcon.2016.7831225.
Full textDi Francesco, Antonio, and Valerio De Santis. "Skin Thermal Modeling for Exposure Assessment above 6 GHz: Models Comparison." In 2020 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility - EMC EUROPE. IEEE, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/emceurope48519.2020.9245843.
Full textZama, A., S. Bacha, A. Benchaib, D. Frey, and S. Silvant. "Comparison and assessment of implementation techniques for dynamics MMC type models." In 2019 21st European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications (EPE '19 ECCE Europe). IEEE, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.23919/epe.2019.8914946.
Full textŁapka, Piotr, Piotr Furmański, and Tomasz S. Wiśniewski. "Comparison of different bioheat transfer models for assessment of burns injuries." In INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING 2016 (ICCMSE 2016). Author(s), 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4968681.
Full textSoulat, Laurent, Irwin Kernemp, Stephane Moreau, and Rasika Fernando. "Assessment and comparison of tonal noise models for Counter-Rotating Open Rotors." In 19th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference. Reston, Virginia: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-2201.
Full textEscalera, A., M. Prodanovic, E. D. Castronuovo, and J. C. Mazuera. "A Comparison of The Renewable Distributed Generation Models used in Reliability Assessment." In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS). IEEE, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/pmaps.2018.8440432.
Full textReports on the topic "Comparison assessment models"
Wahl, L. E. A comparison of radiological risk assessment models: Risk assessment models used by the BEIR V Committee, UNSCEAR, ICRP, and EPA (for NESHAP). Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), March 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/10141938.
Full textErulkar, Annabel, and Erica Chong. Evaluation of a savings and micro-credit program for vulnerable young women in Nairobi. Population Council, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.31899/pgy19.1010.
Full textVenäläinen, Ari, Sanna Luhtala, Mikko Laapas, Otto Hyvärinen, Hilppa Gregow, Mikko Strahlendorff, Mikko Peltoniemi, et al. Sää- ja ilmastotiedot sekä uudet palvelut auttavat metsäbiotaloutta sopeutumaan ilmastonmuutokseen. Finnish Meteorological Institute, January 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.35614/isbn.9789523361317.
Full textPedersen, Gjertrud. Symphonies Reframed. Norges Musikkhøgskole, August 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.22501/nmh-ar.481294.
Full text