Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Comparative genomic hybridization / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Comparative genomic hybridization'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Comparative genomic hybridization.

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 20 February 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Comparative genomic hybridization.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Barrett, Irene J., Brenda L. Lomax, Tatiana Loukianova, Steven S. Tang, Valia S. Lestou, and Dagmar K. Kalousek. "Comparative Genomic Hybridization." Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 125, no. 1 (January 1, 2001): 81–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.5858/2001-125-0081-cgh.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract Objective.—To demonstrate the effectiveness of comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) for analysis of reproductive pathology specimens in clinical cytogenetics laboratories. Design.—A total of 856 CGH analyses were performed on various placental and fetal tissues derived from 368 specimens of spontaneous abortions and on placentas from 219 pregnancies with live-born infants. The live-born infants were clinically evaluated as normally developed, with either a normal birth weight or with intrauterine growth restriction; some live-born infants had an abnormal prenatal triple screen with normal cytogenetic results on amniotic fluid cell cultures. Results.—Comparative genomic hybridization analysis was successfully performed on 856 samples from spontaneously aborted specimens and term placentas. Failure of analysis occurred in 1.6% of samples and was due to an insufficient amount of tissue for DNA extraction. Comparative genomic hybridization identified aneuploidy in 53% of spontaneous abortion samples and 3.1% of term placentas. Conclusions.—Comparative genomic hybridization analysis is a useful clinical tool for detection of aneuploidy in placental and fetal tissues. It provides a genome-wide screen while eliminating tissue culture failures, culture artifacts, and maternal cell contamination. We present practical guidelines for interpreting CGH profiles derived from human reproductive specimens.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Kellner, Udo, Anja Jacobsen, Angela Kellner, René Mantke, Albert Roessner, and Christoph Röcken. "Comparative Genomic Hybridization." American Journal of Clinical Pathology 119, no. 2 (February 2003): 265–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1309/ef69vndlvpwve4qv.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Pinkel, Daniel, and Donna G. Albertson. "COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION." Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 6, no. 1 (September 2005): 331–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.genom.6.080604.162140.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Pinkel, D., R. Segraves, D. Sudar, L. van Vliet, S. Clark, C. Chen, Y. Zhai, J. W. Gray, and D. G. Albertson. "Comparative Genomic Hybridization to Dna Microarrays." Microscopy and Microanalysis 3, S2 (August 1997): 205–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1431927600007911.

Full text

Abstract:

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), which involves the simultaneous hybridization of differentially labeled total genomic DNA from test cells and reference normal cells to metaphase chromosomes, has been used extensively to screen tumor genomes for regions of DNA sequence copy number variation. Analysis of these hybridizations requires quantitative analysis of the ratio of intensities of the fluorescent hybridization signals as a function of position along the chromosomes, which basically serve as a convenient genetic map. The ratios need to be measured very accurately since changes of about ± 20% from the average for the genome indicate important genetic events. Widespread use of CGH over the past several years has identified numerous regions of the genome that may contain currently unknown cancer genes. For example, regions of increased copy number may indicate sites of oncogenes, while regions of copy number decrease relative to average for the genome may signify the presence of a tumor suppressor gene.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Fiorentino, Francesco. "Array comparative genomic hybridization." Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 24, no. 4 (August 2012): 203–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/gco.0b013e328355854d.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Done, Susan B. "Diagnostic Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization." Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 8, no. 5 (November 2006): 527. http://dx.doi.org/10.2353/jmoldx.2006.060152.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Jeuken, Judith W. M., Sandra H. E. Sprenger, and Pieter Wesseling. "Comparative Genomic Hybridization: Practical Guidelines." Diagnostic Molecular Pathology 11, no. 4 (December 2002): 193–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00019606-200212000-00002.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Toraman, Ahter Dilsad, Keser, Güven Lüleci, Nurdan Tunalı, and Tekinalp Gelen. "Comparative genomic hybridization in ganglioneuroblastomas." Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics 132, no. 1 (January 2002): 36–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4608(01)00521-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Koschny, Ronald, Thomas Koschny, Ursula G. Froster, Wolfgang Krupp, and Margit A. Zuber. "Comparative genomic hybridization in glioma." Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics 135, no. 2 (June 2002): 147–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4608(01)00650-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Rienstein, Shlomit, Eric F. Adams, David Pilzer, Ayala Aviram Goldring, Boleslaw Goldman, and Eitan Friedman. "Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of craniopharyngiomas." Journal of Neurosurgery 98, no. 1 (January 2003): 162–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/jns.2003.98.1.0162.

Full text

Abstract:

Object. Craniopharyngioma is the most common childhood brain tumor and is thought to arise from embryonic remnants of the Rathke pouch. Some craniopharyngiomas are monoclonal in origin and hence presumably harbor somatic genetic alterations, although the precise molecular mechanisms involved in craniopharyngioma development are unknown. The goal of this study was to identify genetic alterations in craniopharyngiomas. Methods. To gain insight into the molecular mechanisms involved in development of these tumors, the authors analyzed nine adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas by using comparative genomic hybridization. Six tumors (67%) displayed at least one genomic alteration, and three had six or more alterations. Only two tumors displayed a decrease in DNA copy number, and in all others an increase in DNA copy number was noted. Conclusions. The authors conclude that a subset of craniopharyngiomas consists of monoclonal tumors arising from activation of oncogenes located at specific chromosomal loci.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Lee, M.-W., K.-J. Jee, S.-S. Han, G.-Y. Gong, J.-H. Choi, K.-C. Moon, and J.-K. Koh. "Comparative genomic hybridization in epithelioid sarcoma." British Journal of Dermatology 151, no. 5 (November 2004): 1054–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06246.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Forozan, Farahnaz, Ritva Karhu, Juha Kononen, Anne Kallioniemi, and Olli-P. Kallioniemi. "Genome screening by comparative genomic hybridization." Trends in Genetics 13, no. 10 (October 1997): 405–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0168-9525(97)01244-4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Khan, J., N. Z. Parsa, T. Harada, P. S. Meltzer, and N. P. Carter. "Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of meningiomas." Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics 98, no. 2 (October 1997): 171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4608(97)90325-3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Lichter, Peter, Stefan Joos, Martin Bentz, and Stefan Lampel. "Comparative genomic hybridization: Uses and limitations." Seminars in Hematology 37, no. 4 (October 2000): 348–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1053/shem.2000.16594.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Kallioniemi, Olli-P. "Comparative genomic hybridization gaining in popularity." Trends in Genetics 12, no. 6 (June 1996): 237–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0168-9525(96)81445-4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Lichter, Peter, Stefan Joos, Martin Bentz, and Stefan Lampel. "Comparative genomic hybridization: Uses and limitations." Seminars in Hematology 37, no. 4 (October 2000): 348–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0037-1963(00)90015-5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Wiltshire, Rodney N., James E. Herndon, Annie Lloyd, Henry S. Friedman, Darell D. Bigner, Sandra H. Bigner, and Roger E. McLendon. "Comparative Genomic Hybridization Analysis of Astrocytomas." Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 6, no. 3 (August 2004): 166–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1525-1578(10)60507-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Baldocchi, R. A., R. J. Glynne, D. Kowbel, E. Tom, C. Collins, D. H. Mack, and J. W. Gray. "Oligonucleotide-array–based comparative genomic hybridization." Nature Genetics 23, S3 (November 1999): 32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/14265.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Van den Veyver, Ignatia B., and Arthur L. Beaudet. "Comparative genomic hybridization and prenatal diagnosis." Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 18, no. 2 (April 2006): 185–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.gco.0000192986.22718.cc.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

&NA;, &NA;. "Comparative genomic hybridization: a powerful tool." Advances in Anatomic Pathology 6, no. 1 (January 1999): 59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00125480-199901000-00013.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Levy, Brynn, Teresa M. Dunn, Sara Kaffe, Nataline Kardon, and Kurt Hirschhorn. "Clinical applications of comparative genomic hybridization." Genetics in Medicine 1, no. 1 (December 1998): 4–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00125817-199811000-00004.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Tarkkanen, Maija, Tom A. Wiklund, Martti J. Virolainen, Marcelo L. Larramendy, Nils Mandahl, Fredrik Mertens, Carl P. Blomqvist, et al. "Comparative genomic hybridization of postirradiation sarcomas." Cancer 92, no. 7 (2001): 1992–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0142(20011001)92:7<1992::aid-cncr1719>3.0.co;2-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Hu, Jie, Marcia Wills, Barbara A. Baker, and Elizabeth J. Perlman. "Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of hepatoblastomas." Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer 27, no. 2 (February 2000): 196–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-2264(200002)27:2<196::aid-gcc12>3.0.co;2-d.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

du Manoir, Stanislas, Evelin Schröck, Martin Bentz, Michael R. Speicher, Stefan Joos, Thomas Ried, Peter Lichter, and Thomas Cremer. "Quantitative analysis of comparative genomic hybridization." Cytometry 19, no. 1 (January 1, 1995): 27–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990190105.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Lundsteen, Claes, Jan Maahr, Britta Christensen, Thue Bryndorf, Martin Bentz, Peter Lichter, and Tommy Gerdes. "Image analysis in comparative genomic hybridization." Cytometry 19, no. 1 (January 1, 1995): 42–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990190106.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Prescher, Gabriele, Michael R. Speicher, Stanislas du Manoir, Bernhard Horsthemke, Thomas Cremer, and Reinhard Becher. "Comparative genomic hybridization of uveal melanoma." Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics 77, no. 2 (October 1994): 163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0165-4608(94)90289-5.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Tong, Carol Y. K., Angela B. Y. Hui, Xiao-Lu Yin, Jesse C. S. Pang, Xian-Lun Zhu, Wai-Sang Poon, and Ho-Keung Ng. "Detection of oncogene amplifications in medulloblastomas by comparative genomic hybridization and array-based comparative genomic hybridization." Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics 100, no. 2 (February 2004): 187–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/ped.2004.100.2.0187.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Morrison, Carl. "Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization and Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization: Complementary Techniques for Genomic Evaluation." Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 130, no. 7 (July 1, 2006): 967–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.5858/2006-130-967-fishaa.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract During the past few years a new high-throughput molecular technology, array comparative genomic hybridization, has received a great deal of attention. As a DNA-based tool, this technique is presumably more reproducible than expression arrays. In this review, I discuss how array comparative genomic hybridization is remarkably similar with regard to genome analysis to fluorescent in situ hybridization, a technique that is generally regarded as one of the more accurate and reproducible molecular techniques in diagnostic surgical pathology. A thorough understanding of this technology will be useful for all surgical pathologists in the near future, as this technology will no doubt have some influence on our daily practice.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Eribo, Broderick, Sirima Mingmongkolchai, Tingfen Yan, Padunsri Dubbs, and Karen E. Nelson. "Leptospire Genomic Diversity Revealed by Microarray-Based Comparative Genomic Hybridization." Applied and Environmental Microbiology 78, no. 9 (February 17, 2012): 3045–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/aem.07465-11.

Full text

Abstract:

ABSTRACTComparative genomic hybridization was used to compare genetic diversity of five strains ofLeptospira(Leptospira interrogansserovars Bratislava, Canicola, and Hebdomadis andLeptospira kirschneriserovars Cynopteri and Grippotyphosa). The array was designed based on two available sequencedLeptospirareference genomes, those ofL. interrogansserovar Copenhageni andL. interrogansserovar Lai. A comparison of genetic contents showed thatL. interrogansserovar Bratislava was closest to the reference genomes whileL. kirschneriserovar Grippotyphosa had the least similarity to the reference genomes. Cluster analysis indicated thatL. interrogansserovars Bratislava and Hebdomadis clustered together first, followed byL. interrogansserovar Canicola, before the twoL. kirschneristrains. Confirmed/potential virulence factors identified in previous research were also detected in the tested strains.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Halilović-Alihodžić, Mervisa. "Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) in molecular diagnostics." Bioengineering Studies 2, no. 2 (September 1, 2021): 37–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.37868/bes.v2i2.id194.

Full text

Abstract:

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a powerful molecular cytogenetic approach for identifying chromosomal abnormalities. CGH allows researchers to scan whole genomes for changes in DNA copy numbers. Starting in 2004, the array CGH became an irreplaceable method for the detection of gene mutations in people with congenital and developmental abnormalities, such as intellectual disability, dysmorphic characteristics, developmental delay, or several congenital deformities without an obvious syndrome pattern. This review focuses on the evolution of array CGH technology and its use in molecular diagnostics and its advantages over older cytogenetic tools. This review further highlights special arrays developed in the past decade which detect small intragenic copy number changes as well as large DNA segments for the region of heterozygosity.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Fishel, Simon, and Colleen Lynch. "Can comparative genomic hybridization improvein vitrofertilization outcomes?" Expert Review of Obstetrics & Gynecology 3, no. 1 (January 2008): 51–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1586/17474108.3.1.51.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Stouffs, K., D. Vandermaelen, A. Massart, B. Menten, S. Vergult, H. Tournaye, and W. Lissens. "Array comparative genomic hybridization in male infertility." Human Reproduction 27, no. 3 (January 11, 2012): 921–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der440.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Chan, LW, KW Choy, TY Leung, and TK Lau. "Prenatal diagnosis by array-comparative genomic hybridization." Expert Opinion on Medical Diagnostics 3, no. 6 (August 27, 2009): 649–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/17530050903222247.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Elias, Sherman. "Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis by Comparative Genomic Hybridization." New England Journal of Medicine 345, no. 21 (November 22, 2001): 1569–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/nejm200111223452112.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Lee, M.-W., K.-J. Jee, G.-Y. Gong, J.-H. Choi, K.-C. Moon, and J.-K. Koh. "Comparative genomic hybridization in extramammary Paget's disease." British Journal of Dermatology 153, no. 2 (August 2005): 290–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06589.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Steenman, M., B. Redeker, M. deMeulemeester, K. Wiesmeijer, P. A. Voûte, A. Westerveld, R. Slater, and M. Mannens. "Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of Wilms tumors." Cytogenetic and Genome Research 77, no. 3-4 (1997): 296–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000134602.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Wilton, Leeanda, Lucille Voullaire, Peta Sargent, Robert Williamson, and John McBain. "Preimplantation embryo screening using comparative genomic hybridization." Fertility and Sterility 80, no. 4 (October 2003): 875. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0015-0282(03)01166-x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Appanna, Timson C., Shareen H. Doak, Spencer A. Jenkins, Howard G. Kynaston, Timothy P. Stephenson, and James M. Parry. "Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) of augmentation cystoplasties." International Journal of Urology 14, no. 6 (June 2007): 539–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2006.01724.x.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Sidhu, Stan, Deborah J. Marsh, George Theodosopoulos, Jeanette Philips, Christopher P. Bambach, Peter Campbell, Christopher J. Magarey, et al. "Comparative Genomic Hybridization Analysis of Adrenocortical Tumors." Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 87, no. 7 (July 1, 2002): 3467–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1210/jcem.87.7.8697.

Full text

Abstract:

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a molecular cytogenetic technique that allows the entire genome of a tumor to be surveyed for gains and losses of DNA copy sequences. A limited number of studies reporting the use of this technique in adult adrenocortical tumors have yielded conflicting results. In this study we performed CGH analysis on 13 malignant, 18 benign, and 1 tumor of indeterminate malignant potential with the aim of identifying genetic loci consistently implicated in the development and progression of adrenocortical tumors. Tissue samples from 32 patients with histologically proven adrenocortical tumors were available for CGH analysis. CGH changes were seen in all cancers, 11 of 18 (61%) adenomas, and the 1 tumor of indeterminate malignant potential. Of the adrenal cancers, the most common gains were seen on chromosomes 5 (46%), 12 (38%), 19 (31%), and 4 (31%). Losses were most frequently seen at 1p (62%), 17p (54%), 22 (38%), 2q (31%), and 11q (31%). Of the benign adenomas, the most common change was gain of 4q (22%). Mann-Whitney analysis showed a highly significant difference between the cancer group (mean changes, 7.6) and the adenoma group (mean changes, 1.1) for the number of observed CGH changes (P < 0.01). Logistic regression analysis showed that the number of CGH changes was highly predictive of tumor type (P < 0.01). This study has identified several chromosomal loci implicated in adrenocortical tumorigenesis. Activation of a protooncogene(s) on chromosome 4 may be an early event, with progression from adenoma to carcinoma involving activation of oncogenes on chromosomes 5 and 12 and inactivation of tumor suppressor genes on chromosome arms 1p and 17p.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Llorente, J. "Comparative genomic hybridization of primary sinonasal adenocarcinomas." Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 129, no. 2 (August 2003): P164—P165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0194-5998(03)00987-2.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Didraga, M. A., E. H. van Beers, K. Brandwijk, S. A. Joosse, F. B. L. Hogervorst, L. F. A. Wessels, S. Verhoef, P. Devilee, and P. M. Nederlof. "Comparative genomic hybridization of BRCAX breast tumors." Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics 203, no. 1 (November 2010): 67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2010.07.052.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Chien, Gary, Po Wing Yuen, Dora Kwong, and Yok Lam Kwong. "Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of nasopharygeal carcinoma:." Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics 126, no. 1 (April 2001): 63–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4608(00)00392-7.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Struski, Stéphanie, Martine Doco-Fenzy, and Pascale Cornillet-Lefebvre. "Compilation of published comparative genomic hybridization studies." Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics 135, no. 1 (May 2002): 63–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4608(01)00624-0.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Steenman, M., M. de Meulemeester, C. Wiesmeijer, E. Redeker, A. Westerveld, P. Voûte, R. Slater, and M. Mannens. "Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of wilms tumors." Cancer Genetics and Cytogenetics 91, no. 2 (October 1996): 142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0165-4608(97)82579-4.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Gunn, Shelly R., Ryan S. Robetorye, and Mansoor S. Mohammed. "Comparative Genomic Hybridization Arrays in Clinical Pathology." Molecular Diagnosis & Therapy 11, no. 2 (March 2007): 73–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03256225.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

&NA;. "Comparative genomic hybridization and solitary fibrous tumors." Advances in Anatomic Pathology 5, no. 2 (March 1998): 127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00125480-199803000-00051.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Rozeman, Leida B., Karoly Szuhai, Yvonne M. Schrage, Carla Rosenberg, Hans J. Tanke, Antonie H. M. Taminiau, Anne Marie Cleton-Jansen, Judith V. M. G. Bovée, and Pancras C. W. Hogendoorn. "Array-comparative genomic hybridization of central chondrosarcoma." Cancer 107, no. 2 (2006): 380–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22001.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Rickert, Christian H., Ronald Simon, Markus Bergmann, Barbara Dockhorn-Dworniczak, and Werner Paulus. "Comparative genomic hybridization in pineal parenchymal tumors." Genes, Chromosomes and Cancer 30, no. 1 (2000): 99–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1098-2264(2000)9999:9999<::aid-gcc1067>3.0.co;2-c.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Rosenberg, C., T. Bakker Schut, M. C. Mostert, H. J. Tanke, A. K. Raap, J. W. Oosterhuis, and L. H. J. Looijenga. "Comparative genomic hybridization in hypotriploid/hyperdiploid tumors." Cytometry 29, no. 2 (October 1, 1997): 113–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0320(19971001)29:2<113::aid-cyto3>3.0.co;2-e.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Piper, Jim, Denis Rutovitz, Damir Sudar, Anne Kallioniemi, Olli-P. Kallioniemi, Frederic M. Waldman, Joe W. Gray, and Dan Pinkel. "Computer image analysis of comparative genomic hybridization." Cytometry 19, no. 1 (January 1, 1995): 10–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.990190104.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!