Journal articles: 'Codesign'

1

Brighton, Lisa Jane, Nannette Spain, Jose Gonzalez-Nieto, Karen A. Ingram, Jennifer Harvey, William D.-C. Man, and Claire M. Nolan. "Remote pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease: developing the model using experience-based codesign." BMJ Open Respiratory Research 11, no. 1 (February 2024): e002061. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002061.

Full text

Abstract:

BackgroundRemote delivery may improve access to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Existing studies are largely limited to individuals with COPD, and the interventions have lacked codesign elements to reflect the needs and experiences of people with chronic respiratory disease, their carers/families and healthcare professionals. The aim of this study was, using experience-based codesign (EBCD), to collaborate with people with interstitial lung disease (ILD), their carers/families and healthcare professionals, to codesign a remote PR programme ready for testing in a future study.MethodsEBCD comprises interviews, stakeholder workshops and codesign meetings. One-to-one videorecorded interviews with purposively selected people with ILD with experience of PR, their carers/families and healthcare professionals, were edited into a 20 min film. The film was shown at three audiorecorded stakeholder feedback events to identify key themes and touchpoints, and short-list key programme components. The programme was finalised at two further codesign workshops.ResultsTen people with ILD, four carers/families and seven healthcare professionals were interviewed. Participants in the codesign workshops included service-user group: n=14 and healthcare professional group: n=11; joint event: n=21. Final refinements were made with small codesign teams, one comprising three people with ILD and one carer/family member, one with five healthcare professionals. The final codesigned model is a group based, supervised programme delivered by videoconference. Key elements of programme specific to ILD include recommendations to ensure participant safety in the context of desaturation risk, dedicated time for peer support and adaption of the education programme for ILD needs, including signposting to palliative care.ConclusionIn this EBCD project, a remote PR programme for people with ILD was codesigned by service-users, their carers/families and multidisciplinary healthcare professionals. Future research should explore the feasibility and acceptability of this intervention.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

McKercher, Jonathan P., Susan C. Slade, Jalal A. Jazayeri, Anita Hodge, Matthew Knight, Janet Green, Jeffrey Woods, Claire Thwaites, and Meg E. Morris. "Patient experiences of codesigned rehabilitation interventions in hospitals: a rapid review." BMJ Open 12, no. 11 (November 2022): e068241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068241.

Full text

Abstract:

BackgroundCodesign strengthens partnerships between healthcare workers and patients. It also facilitates collaborations supporting the development, design and delivery of healthcare services. Prior rehabilitation reviews have focused mainly on the clinical and organisational outcomes of codesign with less focus on the lived experience of rehabilitation patients.ObjectiveTo explore patient experiences of codesigned hospital rehabilitation interventions.DesignRapid review and evidence synthesis of the literature.Data sourcesCINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane were searched from 1 January 2000 to 25 April 2022.Study selectionStudies reporting patient experiences of codesigned rehabilitation interventions in hospitals.Results4156 studies were screened, and 38 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility. Seven studies were included in the final rapid review. Five out of the seven studies involved neurological rehabilitation. All eligible studies used qualitative research methods. The main barriers to codesign were related to staffing and dedicated time allocated to face-to-face patient-therapist interactions. High-quality relationships between patients and their therapists were a facilitator of codesign. Thematic synthesis revealed that codesigned rehabilitation interventions can enable a meaningful experience for patients and facilitate tailoring of treatments to align with individual needs. Personalised rehabilitation increases patient involvement in rehabilitation planning, delivery and decision-making. It also promotes positive feelings of empowerment and hope.ConclusionThis rapid review supports the implementation of codesigned rehabilitation interventions to improve patient experiences in hospitals.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021264547.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Schäfer, Louis, Laura Burkhardt, Andreas Kuhnle, and Gisela Lanza. "Integriertes Produkt-Produktions-Codesign/Integrated product-production codesign." wt Werkstattstechnik online 111, no. 04 (2021): 201–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2021-04-23.

Full text

Abstract:

Eine steigende Variantenvielfalt, hohe Marktvolatilität und heterogene Prozesslandschaften betonen die Bedeutung einer simultanen Betrachtung von Produkt- und Produktionssystem für produzierende Unternehmen. Vor dem Hintergrund einer wandlungsfähigen Produktionsplanung und -steuerung stellt dieser Beitrag eine Methodik zur Implementierung eines integrierten Produkt-Produktions-Codesigns vor. Bestandteile sind ein ganzheitliches Änderungsmanagement und die Identifikation von Lösungsmustern.   An increasing number of variants, high market volatility, and heterogeneous process landscapes emphasize the importance of a simultaneous consideration of product and production for manufacturing companies. Against the background of adaptive production planning and control (PPC), this paper proposes a methodology for implementing an integrated product-production-Codesign, consisting of a holistic analysis of changes and their impact on the system, as well as the identification of solution patterns.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Crowther, Lucia, Mark Pearson, Helena Cummings, and Michael George Crooks. "Towards codesign in respiratory care: development of an implementation-ready intervention to improve guideline-adherent adult asthma care across primary and secondary care settings (The SENTINEL Project)." BMJ Open Respiratory Research 9, no. 1 (February 2022): e001155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001155.

Full text

Abstract:

Short-acting beta agonist (SABA) overuse (≥3 canisters annually) is associated with worse asthma outcomes and accounts for the majority of greenhouse gas emissions from asthma inhalers in England. Reducing SABA overuse aligns with the National Health Service long-term plan to optimise asthma treatment while minimising environmental impact, but adoption of local asthma guidelines for a SABA-free maintenance and reliever therapy strategy for step 3 asthma patients is limited. In this Perspective, we describe patient and staff involvement in a codesign process adapted from experience-based codesign (EBCD) principles to develop an implementation-ready intervention within a practice-relevant timescale.The codesigned intervention consists of five pillars: healthcare professional education; implementation of ‘gold standard’ prescribing practices; targeted asthma reviews; patient education and support; and real-time data monitoring and reporting of asthma care metrics. The codesign process contributed to all pillars and, by identifying potential individual and organisational barriers to implementation, enabled the development of plans to address these barriers.In this Perspective, we reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of our codesign process, outline how EBCD principles can be used in respiratory research and propose actions for patients, health professionals, researchers and funders to develop the potential of EBCD in respiratory research.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Tomesh, Teague, and Margaret Martonosi. "Quantum Codesign." IEEE Micro 41, no. 5 (September 1, 2021): 33–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mm.2021.3094461.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Jagtap, Santosh. "Codesign in resource-limited societies: theoretical perspectives, inputs, outputs and influencing factors." Research in Engineering Design 33, no. 2 (February 3, 2022): 191–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00163-022-00384-1.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractCodesign with resource-constrained people living in developing countries is crucial for sustained adoption and use of designed solutions. Several studies have investigated codesign with resource-constrained people. It is, therefore, important to understand what has been investigated and learnt so far as well as to plan for further scholarly exploration of this field. To address this, I applied a systematic literature review (SLR) approach to understand main sources, definitions, and theoretical perspectives regarding codesign with resource-constrained people. The SLR also aimed to understand inputs and outputs of codesign as well as factors influencing the codesign process. The findings portray a multifaceted picture regarding these aspects of codesign. I discuss implications of review findings for the practice of codesigning solutions with resource-constrained people, identify concerns that researchers should have about this field, and offer suggestions for future research in this field of codesign.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Wright, Lucy C., Natalia Lopez Chemas, and Claudia Cooper. "Lived experience codesign of self-harm interventions: a scoping review." BMJ Open 13, no. 12 (December 2023): e079090. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079090.

Full text

Abstract:

ObjectivesThis study aims to map existing literature describing how people with lived experience of self-harm have engaged in codesigning self-harm interventions, understand barriers and facilitators to this engagement, and how the meaningfulness of codesign has been evaluated.DesignScoping review by Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. A protocol was published online (http://dx.doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/P52UD).Data sourcesPubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PROSPERO, ClinicalTrials.gov and relevant websites were searched on 24 December 2022 (repeated 4 November 2023).Eligibility criteriaWe included studies where individuals with lived experience of self-harm (first-hand or caregiver) have codesigned self-harm interventions.Data extraction and synthesisResults were screened at title and abstract level, then full-text level by two researchers independently. Prespecified data were extracted, charted and sorted into themes.ResultsWe included 22 codesigned interventions across mobile health, educational settings, prisons and emergency departments. Involvement varied from designing content to multistage involvement in planning, delivery and dissemination. Included papers described the contribution of 159 female, 39 male and 21 transgender or gender diverse codesigners. Few studies included contributors from a minoritised ethnic or LGBTQIA+ group. Six studies evaluated how meaningfully people with lived experience were engaged in codesign: by documenting the impact of contributions on intervention design or through postdesign reflections. Barriers included difficulties recruiting inclusively, making time for meaningful engagement in stretched services and safeguarding concerns for codesigners. Explicit processes for ensuring safety and well-being, flexible schedules, and adequate funding facilitated codesign.ConclusionsTo realise the potential of codesign to improve self-harm interventions, people with lived experience must be representative of those who use services. This requires processes that reassure potential contributors and referrers that codesigners will be safeguarded, remunerated, and their contributions used and valued.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Rojo, Jacqueline, Ajesh George, Yenna Salamonson, Leanne Hunt, and Lucie M. Ramjan. "Using Codesign to Develop a Novel Oral Healthcare Educational Intervention for Undergraduate Nursing Students." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 6 (March 10, 2023): 4919. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064919.

Full text

Abstract:

To build a nursing workforce that is equipped to undertake oral health promotion and screening, an educational program was needed. With codesign being used in multiple settings, it was selected as the approach to use, with Mezirow’s Transformative Learning theory as the underpinning framework. This study aimed to develop an oral healthcare educational intervention for nursing students. Using a six-step codesign framework, nursing students and faculty staff were invited to participate in two Zoom™ Video Communication workshops to codesign the learning activities to be used in the classroom. The codesign process was evaluated through focus groups and analysed using a hybrid content analysis approach. A multifaceted oral healthcare educational intervention was developed. Learning material was delivered using a range of different learning and teaching resources such as dental models, podcasts, and an oral health assessment across two subjects. Multiple approaches to recruitment, the inclusion of participants, and good facilitation of workshop discussions were critical to the codesign of the educational intervention. Evaluation revealed that preparing participants prior to the workshops acted as a catalyst for conversations, which facilitated the codesign process. Codesign was a useful approach to employ in the development of an oral healthcare intervention to address an area of need.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Gupta, P. "Hardware-software codesign." IEEE Potentials 20, no. 5 (2002): 31–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/45.983337.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Jerraya, A. "Hardware-software codesign." IEEE Design and Test of Computers 17, no. 1 (January 2000): 92–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mdt.2000.825680.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Woo, N. S., A. E. Dunlop, and W. Wolf. "Codesign from cospecification." Computer 27, no. 1 (January 1994): 42–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/2.248879.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Schulz, S., J. W. Rozenblit, M. Mrva, and K. Buchenriede. "Model-based codesign." Computer 31, no. 8 (1998): 60–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/2.707618.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Riggs, Elisha, Jane Yelland, Fiona K. Mensah, Lisa Gold, Josef Szwarc, Ida Kaplan, Rhonda Small, et al. "Group Pregnancy Care for refugee background women: a codesigned, multimethod evaluation protocol applying a community engagement framework and an interrupted time series design." BMJ Open 11, no. 7 (July 2021): e048271. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048271.

Full text

Abstract:

IntroductionPregnancy and early parenthood are key opportunities for interaction with health services and connecting to other families at the same life stage. Public antenatal care should be accessible to all, however barriers persist for families from refugee communities to access, navigate and optimise healthcare during pregnancy. Group Pregnancy Care is an innovative model of care codesigned with a community from a refugee background and other key stakeholders in Melbourne, Australia. Group Pregnancy Care aims to provide a culturally safe and supportive environment for women to participate in antenatal care in a language they understand, to improve health literacy and promote social connections and inclusion. This paper outlines Froup Pregnancy Care and provides details of the evaluation framework.Methods and analysisThe evaluation uses community-based participatory research methods to engage stakeholders in codesign of evaluation methods. The study is being conducted across multiple sites and involves multiple phases, use of quantitative and qualitative methods, and an interrupted time series design. Process and cost-effectiveness measures will be incorporated into quality improvement cycles. Evaluation measures will be developed using codesign and participatory principles informed by community and stakeholder engagement and will be piloted prior to implementation.Ethics and disseminationEthics approvals have been provided by all six relevant authorities. Study findings will be shared with communities and stakeholders via agreed pathways including community forums, partnership meetings, conferences, policy and practice briefs and journal articles. Dissemination activities will be developed using codesign and participatory principles.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Iedema, Rick, Eamon Merrick, Donella Piper, Kate Britton, Jane Gray, Raj Verma, and Nicole Manning. "Codesigning as a Discursive Practice in Emergency Health Services: The Architecture of Deliberation." Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 46, no. 1 (March 2010): 73–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021886309357544.

Full text

Abstract:

This article addresses the issue of how government agencies are increasingly attempting to involve users in the design of public services. The article examines codesign as a method for fostering new and purposeful interaction among service-delivery staff and their customers. Codesign brings together stakeholders who, in the past, have had limited input into the way public services are experienced. By participating in this emerging discourse practice, codesign stakeholders can construct new ways of relating and deliberating. The data presented in this article are drawn from a codesign study initiated by the New South Wales Department of Health in an effort to improve the experience of staff, patients, and caregivers. The article concludes that codesign presents service consumers, professionals, and government officials with new opportunities as well as new challenges. Its opportunities reside in codesign bringing stakeholders together across previously impervious boundaries, producing new understandings, relationships, and engagements. Its challenges reside in these new understandings, relationships, and engagements only becoming possible and only continuing to be relevant if and when stakeholders are prepared to adopt and adapt to the new discourse needed to realize them, implicating them in what has been referred to as the “design competency spiral.”

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Khalifa, Muhammad, and Nimo M. Abdi. "Rescue from Coloniality? The Power of Dreaming." Journal of Family Diversity in Education 5, no. 2 (May 17, 2023): 115–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.53956/jfde.2023.189.

Full text

Abstract:

In this essay, the authors reflect on the context and promise of Codesign and Theories of Change (TOC). Throughout my (MK) academic career, the Codesign work undertaken by the Family Leadership Design Collaborative (FLDC) has been one of the most inspirational, humanizing, and anti-colonial academic projects in which they have engaged or witnessed. The conveners, two women of Indigenous/Italian and Asian American descent, honored and humanized the knowledges and voices of all those who contributed to the Codesign – parents, community leaders and advocates, researchers, school leaders, and students. This is unusual in Western educational spaces that sit on colonial histories. The activities in the Codesign were designed to foster thinking and research outside of traditional educational structures and histories. This type of Codesign is also unusual in that it represents a break from the school-centric past in which people in the US typically confine themselves to dreaming within the educational histories and technologies.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

Trischler, Jakob, Simon J. Pervan, Stephen J. Kelly, and Don R. Scott. "The Value of Codesign." Journal of Service Research 21, no. 1 (July 10, 2017): 75–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1094670517714060.

Full text

Abstract:

Codesign allows a design team to combine two sets of knowledge that are key to service design: Customer insights into latent user needs and in-house professionals’ conversion of promising new ideas into viable concepts. While some studies highlight the potential of codesign, others are more skeptical pointing to a lack of clarity over how the involvement of customers affects the design process and outcomes. This article addresses this knowledge gap by reporting on a real-world comparison of design concepts generated by codesign teams with those generated by an in-house professional team and a team solely made up of users in the course of a library service ideation contest. The comparison indicates that codesign teams generate concepts that score significantly higher in user benefit and novelty but lower in feasibility. However, these outcomes are only possible in cohesive teams that develop design concepts collaboratively. In contrast, in teams where individuals dominate, conflict, less collaboration, and diminished innovation outcomes are more likely. The findings add to a better understanding of the value of codesign and shed light on the complex relationship between design team composition, intrateam factors, and innovation outcomes. Service designers obtain recommendations for selecting customers, assembling teams, and managing intrateam dynamics to enhance codesign success.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Watts‐Englert, Jennifer, and Emily Yang. "Using a Codesign Workshop to Make an Impact with Codesign Research." Design Management Journal 16, no. 1 (October 2021): 111–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dmj.12072.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Aitken, Sarah Joy, Sophie James, Amy Lawrence, Anthony Glover, Henry Pleass, Janani Thillianadesan, Sue Monaro, Kerry Hitos, and Vasi Naganathan. "Codesign of health technology interventions to support best-practice perioperative care and surgical waitlist management." BMJ Health & Care Informatics 31, no. 1 (March 2024): e100928. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100928.

Full text

Abstract:

ObjectivesThis project aimed to determine where health technology can support best-practice perioperative care for patients waiting for surgery.MethodsAn exploratory codesign process used personas and journey mapping in three interprofessional workshops to identify key challenges in perioperative care across four health districts in Sydney, Australia. Through participatory methodology, the research inquiry directly involved perioperative clinicians. In three facilitated workshops, clinician and patient participants codesigned potential digital interventions to support perioperative pathways. Workshop output was coded and thematically analysed, using design principles.ResultsCodesign workshops, involving 51 participants, were conducted October to November 2022. Participants designed seven patient personas, with consumer representatives confirming acceptability and diversity. Interprofessional team members and consumers mapped key clinical moments, feelings and barriers for each persona during a hypothetical perioperative journey. Six key themes were identified: ‘preventative care’, ‘personalised care’, ‘integrated communication’, ‘shared decision-making’, ‘care transitions’ and ‘partnership’. Twenty potential solutions were proposed, with top priorities a digital dashboard and virtual care coordination.DiscussionOur findings emphasise the importance of interprofessional collaboration, patient and family engagement and supporting health technology infrastructure. Through user-based codesign, participants identified potential opportunities where health technology could improve system efficiencies and enhance care quality for patients waiting for surgical procedures. The codesign approach embedded users in the development of locally-driven, contextually oriented policies to address current perioperative service challenges, such as prolonged waiting times and care fragmentation.ConclusionHealth technology innovation provides opportunities to improve perioperative care and integrate clinical information. Future research will prototype priority solutions for further implementation and evaluation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Hyett, Nerida, Kerryn Bagley, Teresa Iacono, Carol McKinstry, Jo Spong, and Oriane Landry. "Evaluation of a Codesign Method Used to Support the Inclusion of Children With Disability in Mainstream Schools." International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19 (January 1, 2020): 160940692092498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1609406920924982.

Full text

Abstract:

Codesign is increasingly used for health research and service improvement. Codesign combines generative and exploratory methods, enabling collaboration between service end users and researchers as equal partners. The aim of this study was to evaluate a codesign method used to design an online education package about inclusive education for children with disability in mainstream schools. The study design was a multiple methods evaluation informed by participatory and transformative research paradigms, incorporating design sciences and public service approaches. A governance committee supported the process. The codesigners ( n = 12) included teachers, teacher assistants, parents, and allied health professionals. Process and outcome evaluation data were used; data collected were from verbatim transcripts of codesign workshop discussions ( n = 11), documents, Self-Report Level of Participation Surveys, and individual interviews ( n = 11). Thematic and descriptive analysis methods were used to describe the codesign processes, experiences, and outcomes. The key processes were identifying the issues through storytelling, voicing frustrations, being vulnerable, sharing insider knowledge, challenging other people’s roles, and deliberation and decision-making. Codesigners’ experiences and outcomes identified strengths and challenges in the method. A conceptual model is presented demonstrating interrelationships between processes, subprocesses, and codesigners’ experiences and outcomes. Codesign involves multiple, interrelated processes that support deliberation and creative design. Skills and resources are required to effectively facilitate what can be a meaningful, creative, and social process.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

De Paoli, Stefano, Paula Forbes, Giulio Andreini, Maciej Maryl, and Marta Błaszczyńska. "CoDesign for Discovery in Social Sciences and Humanities." LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries 34, no. 1 (April 17, 2024): 1–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.53377/lq.14309.

Full text

Abstract:

GoTriple is a novel discovery platform for Social Sciences and Humanities (SSH) in Europe. Discovery is a phase of research where scholars seek to locate resources for their work, such as publications or previous projects. The paper details the work done for involving the SSH community in the codesign of GoTriple, focusing on the research discovery activities. It is an investigation of the user needs and barriers toward digital discovery for the SSH community, conducted through codesign. This work encompassed interviews, a questionnaire, codesign workshops and evaluation activities. The paper reports on some outcomes for the codesign and how user needs were identified and served by novel designs supporting discovery for SSH. This process of design is both concerned with creating digital tools for discovery and with the creation of a community of users that could make the platform thrive. The main contribution of the work is therefore the identification of the user needs for digital discovery in SSH and a series of insights on the design with the user community. The paper comprises a report on how codesign principles do support such work.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

Rösch, Susanne, Stefan Feldmann, Dorothea Förster, and Birgit Vogel-heuser. "Anforderungs- und Testfall-Codesign." atp edition - Automatisierungstechnische Praxis 56, no. 09 (September 1, 2014): 38. http://dx.doi.org/10.17560/atp.v56i09.305.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Dupret, Katia, and Niklas Chimirri. "Teaching ethical participatory codesign." Dansk Universitetspædagogisk Tidsskrift 13, no. 24 (March 8, 2018): 20–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/dut.v13i24.96709.

Full text

Abstract:

How to incorporate critical and societally relevant thinking and acting into Higher Education teaching formats? The article proposes social design workshops, which teach ethics through design by explicitly addressing and building on the functional diversity of participating stakeholders, and by fostering ongoing mutual reflection. These workshops are inspired by participatory design, political theory, disability studies and psychological practice research. By drawing on empirical material from a design workshop with Bachelor students and external collaborators including psychologically vulnerable stakeholders, we argue for an adaptive framework of analytical-pedagogical inquiry that can be continuously co-designed. In particular, ethical design requires a broad and emergent definition of participation. Ethical design is participatory-democratic co-design, which acknowledges and bridges across the various stakeholders’ functional diversity.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Rösch, Susanne, Stefan Feldmann, Dorothea Förster, and Birgit Vogel-heuser. "Anforderungs- und Testfall-Codesign." atp magazin 56, no. 09 (September 3, 2014): 38–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.17560/atp.v56i09.2216.

Full text

Abstract:

Durch den verstärkten Einsatz von Software in mechatronischen Systemen und die hohen Anforderungen an die Qualität derselben, müssen Entwicklungsprozesse bei der mechatronischen Produkt- beziehungsweise Geräteentwicklung angepasst werden, um dem interdisziplinären Charakter in der Entwicklung zu entsprechen. In diesem Beitrag wird eine Untersuchung von aktuellen Vorgehensweisen und den sich daraus ableitenden Herausforderungen an das Anforderungs- und Testmanagement vorgestellt. Ferner wird ein Konzept zur integrierten Modellierung und Spezifikation von Anforderungen und Testfällen vorgestellt. Fazit: Eine Formalisierung von Anforderungen bis hin zu semi-formalen Anforderungen ermöglicht bei der Spezifikation eine automatische Generierung von Testfällen.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Maillet-Contoz, L. "Codesign [hardware/software partitioning]." IEEE Potentials 16, no. 4 (1997): 13–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/45.624333.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Marchioro, G. F., J. M. Daveau, T. B. Ismail, and A. A. Jerraya. "Transformational partitioning for codesign." IEE Proceedings - Computers and Digital Techniques 145, no. 3 (1998): 181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/ip-cdt:19981971.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Estell, John K., and Thomas A. Owen. "Experiencing the codesign process." ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 27, no. 1 (March 15, 1995): 34–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/199691.199709.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Sur, Sayantan, Sreeram Potluri, Krishna Chaitanya Kandalla, Hari Subramoni, Dhabaleswar K. Panda, and Karen Tomko. "Codesign for InfiniBand Clusters." Computer 44, no. 11 (November 2011): 31–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mc.2011.265.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Buchenrieder, K. "Codesign and concurrent engineering." Computer 26, no. 1 (January 1993): 85–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/2.179167.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Wenban, A. S., J. W. O'Leary, and G. M. Brown. "Codesign of communication protocols." Computer 26, no. 12 (December 1993): 46–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/2.247651.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

Radford, Claire, Penelope J. Slater, and Philippa Fielden. "The Oncology Family Forum: Collaborating With Families to Codesign Pediatric Oncology Services." Journal of Patient Experience 7, no. 6 (August 20, 2020): 1671–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2374373520950977.

Full text

Abstract:

The Oncology Services Group at Queensland Children’s Hospital established an Oncology Family Forum in 2018 to enable codesign of service improvements. A total of 26 family members attended the first 4 Forums, with between 12 and 15 attendees at each. Attendees represented a range of diagnoses, were 85% female, 85% resided within 40 km of the tertiary center, and 26% were on-treatment. In a survey of attendees, 83% agreed that the Forum had improved families’ service experience and 92% supported the codesign partnership and the exploration of their suggestions. A small proportion (25%) of attendees disagreed that there was enough time to share, 17% disagreed that all their questions were answered, and 17% disagreed that the Forum represented views of regional families. Respondents identified collaboration, improving understanding and communication as positive aspects of the Forums. Forums will continue to be offered regularly, augmented by videoconferencing (particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic), written responses to family questions and special interest discussion groups. The new collaborations and programs that have been initiated, codesigned, and progressed through these Forums will continue to be the focus of service delivery and quality improvements.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Pereira da Silva, Marcelo, Pedro Rocha Sousa Filho, Nathalia Rodrigues Pinheiro, and Fabiana Aquino de Moraes Rêgo. "COMUNICAÇÃO, ALTERIDADE E CODESIGN: AFINIDADES E OPORTUNIDADES." Comunicologia - Revista de Comunicação da Universidade Católica de Brasília 14, no. 1 (August 7, 2021): 160. http://dx.doi.org/10.31501/comunicologia.v14i1.11823.

Full text

Abstract:

O codesign surge do processo de humanização da pesquisa em design. A eficácia da comunicação e do codesign reside na qualidade das relações entre os sujeitos, fazendo emergir a confiança e a sensibilidade às alteridades. Levamos a cabo discussões teórico-conceituais por meio de uma revisão literária explanatória com o objetivo de delinear os universos da comunicação, confiança e alteridade e sua imbricação com o codesign. Inferimos que as trocas simbólicas só adquirem significado quando os indivíduos são capazes de respeitar as idiossincrasias presentes nas interações em jogo na ribalta da existência humana e social na ambivalente modernidade líquida.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Singh, Hardeep, Michelle LA Nelson, Julia Martyniuk, Heather Colquhoun, Sarah Munce, Jill I. Cameron, Kristina Marie Kokorelias, Oya Pakkal, and Kerry Kuluski. "Scoping review protocol of the use of codesign methods in stroke intervention development." BMJ Open 12, no. 11 (November 2022): e065150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065150.

Full text

Abstract:

IntroductionCodesign is an emerging research method to enhance intervention development by actively engaging non-researchers (eg, people who have had a stroke, caregivers and clinicians) in research. The involvement of non-researchers in research is becoming increasingly popular within health studies as it may produce more relevant and effective findings. The stroke population commonly exhibits challenges such as aphasia and cognitive changes that may limit their participation in codesign. However, the use of codesign within the stroke literature has not been comprehensively reviewed. This scoping review will determine: (1) what is the extent, range and nature of stroke research that has used codesign methods? (2) What codesign methods have been used to develop stroke interventions? (3) What considerations for codesigning interventions with people who have stroke are not captured in the findings?Methods and analysisThis is a protocol for a scoping review to identify the literature relating to stroke, and codesign will be conducted on OVID Medline, OVID Embase, OVID PsychINFO, EBSCO CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, PEDro-Physiotherapy Evidence Database and Global Index Medicus. Studies of any design and publication date will be included. Title and abstract and full-text review will be conducted independently by two reviewers. Data will be extracted, collated and then summarised descriptively using quantitative (eg, numerical descriptions) and qualitative (eg, textual descriptions) methods. Numerical summaries will map the extent (eg, number of studies), range (eg, types of studies) and nature (eg, types of interventions developed) of the literature on this topic. A thematic analysis will provide insights into the codesign methods (eg, activities, non-researchers), including heterogeneity across and within studies.Ethics and disseminationThis review protocol does not require ethics approval as data has not been collected/analysed. The findings will highlight opportunities and recommendations to inform future codesign research in stroke and other populations who exhibit similar challenges/disabilities, and they will be disseminated via publications, presentations and stakeholder meetings.Trial registration numberregistrationOpen Science Framework: 10.17605/OSF.IO/NSD2W.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Laing, Scott, Sarah Jarmain, Jacobi Elliott, Janet Dang, Vala Gylfadottir, Kayla Wierts, and Vineet Nair. "Codesigned standardised referral form: simplifying the complexity." BMJ Health & Care Informatics 31, no. 1 (June 2024): e100926. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100926.

Full text

Abstract:

BackgroundReferring providers are often critiqued for writing poor-quality referrals. This study characterised clinical referral guidelines and forms to understand which data consultant providers require. These data were then used to codesign an evidence-based, high-quality referral form.MethodsThis study used both observational and quality improvement approaches. Canadian referral guidelines were reviewed and summarised. Referral data fields from 150 randomly selected Ontario referral forms were categorised and counted. The referral guideline summary and referral data were then used by referring providers, consultant providers and administrators to codesign a referral form.ResultsReferral guidelines recommended 42 types of referral data be included in referrals. Referral data were categorised as patient demographics, provider demographics, reason for referral, clinical information and administrative information. The percentage of referral guidelines recommending inclusion of each type of referral data varied from 8% to 77%. Ontario referral forms requested 264 different types of referral data. Digital referral forms requested more referral data types than paper-based referral forms (55.0±10.6 vs 30.5±8.1; 95% CI p<0.01). A codesigned referral form was created across two sessions with 29 and 21 participants in each.DiscussionReferral guidelines lack consistency and specificity, which makes writing high-quality referrals challenging. Digital referral forms tend to request more referral data than paper-based referrals, which creates administrative burdens for referring and consultant providers. We created the first codesigned referral form with referring providers, consultant providers and administrators. We recommend clinical adoption of this form to improve referral quality and minimise administrative burdens.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Lobban, Fiona, Matthew Coole, Emma Donaldson, Zoe Glossop, Jade Haines, Rose Johnston, Steven H. Jones, et al. "Improving Peer Online Forums (iPOF): protocol for a realist evaluation of peer online mental health forums to inform practice and policy." BMJ Open 13, no. 7 (July 2023): e075142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075142.

Full text

Abstract:

IntroductionPeer online mental health forums are commonly used and offer accessible support. Positive and negative impacts have been reported by forum members and moderators, but it is unclear why these impacts occur, for whom and in which forums. This multiple method realist study explores underlying mechanisms to understand how forums work for different people. The findings will inform codesign of best practice guidance and policy tools to enhance the uptake and effectiveness of peer online mental health forums.Methods and analysisIn workstream 1, we will conduct a realist synthesis, based on existing literature and interviews with approximately 20 stakeholders, to generate initial programme theories about the impacts of forums on members and moderators and mechanisms driving these. Initial theories that are relevant for forum design and implementation will be prioritised for testing in workstream 2.Workstream 2 is a multiple case study design with mixed methods with several online mental health forums differing in contextual features. Quantitative surveys of forum members, qualitative interviews and Corpus-based Discourse Analysis and Natural Language Processing of forum posts will be used to test and refine programme theories. Final programme theories will be developed through novel triangulation of the data.Workstream 3 will run alongside workstreams 1 and 2. Key stakeholders from participating forums, including members and moderators, will be recruited to a Codesign group. They will inform the study design and materials, refine and prioritise theories, and codesign best policy and practice guidance.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was granted by Solihull Research Ethics Committee (IRAS 314029). Findings will be reported in accordance with RAMESES (Realist And MEta-narrative Evidence Syntheses: Evolving Standards) guidelines, published as open access and shared widely, along with codesigned tools.Trial registration numberISRCTN 62469166; the protocol for the realist synthesis in workstream one is prospectively registered at PROSPERO CRD42022352528.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Ghribi, Ines, Riadh Ben Abdallah, Mohamed Khalgui, Zhiwu Li, Khalid Alnowibet, and Marco Platzner. "R-Codesign: Codesign Methodology for Real-Time Reconfigurable Embedded Systems Under Energy Constraints." IEEE Access 6 (2018): 14078–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/access.2018.2799852.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Kiralawelle Muhandiramge, Janani Randhula Gajadheera. "Influence of Codesign as a Cocreation Strategy on Constructability (Among Sri Lankan Architectural and Engineering Design Start-Up Practices)." Sri Lanka Journal of Marketing 9, no. 1 (July 12, 2023): 56–118. http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/sljmuok.v9i1.120.

Full text

Abstract:

This research looks at the influence that codesign has on the constructability of a project and how the client’s knowledge impacts this relationship. Client knowledge is explored as a mediator. Further The factor that gave the largest contribution to codesign was the form of facilitation with a mean of 1.59, which was closest to the strongly agree point on the scale (number 1 was assigned to Strongly agree). The overall mean value of codesign was 1.82. Knowledge management gave the largest contribution towards constructability with a mean of 1.61. The overall mean of constructability was 1.70. The mediator, client knowledge had an overall mean of 2.10 with experience having the largest contribution with a mean of 2.08. Four hypotheses were tested. Hypothesis 1 was accepted since the correlation was 0.633, and its significance was 0.000, with the regression model fitting by 40.1%, showing that there was an impact on constructability from codesign. Hypothesis 2 was to test whether codesign and client knowledge were related, and it was proven, since correlation is reported to be 0.432 and its significance is 0.000, with the regression model fitting by 18.6%. Hypothesis 3 tested the relationship between client knowledge and constructability. It was also accepted in the correlation is reported to be 0.453 and its significance is 0.000 with the regression model fitting by 20.6%. Further, all factors in the three variables were validated through cross validation via thematic analysis, except for access to information. This could be because the client may not be able to interpret the information on their own. Hypothesis 4 investigated the mediator and an z value of 2.26 with significance of 0.000 indicates that client knowledge significantly mediates the relationship between codesign and constructability.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

Moll, Sandra, Michelle Wyndham-West, Gillian Mulvale, Sean Park, Alexis Buettgen, Michelle Phoenix, Robert Fleisig, and Emma Bruce. "Are you really doing ‘codesign’? Critical reflections when working with vulnerable populations." BMJ Open 10, no. 11 (November 2020): e038339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038339.

Full text

Abstract:

‘Codesign’ and associated terms such as ‘coproduction’ or ‘patient engagement’, are increasingly common in the health research literature, due to an increased emphasis on the importance of ensuring that research related to service/systems development is meaningful to end-users. However, there continues to be a lack of clarity regarding the key principles and practices of codesign, and wide variation in the extent to which service users are meaningfully engaged in the process. These issues are particularly acute when end-users include populations who have significant health and healthcare disparities that are linked to a range of intersecting vulnerabilities (eg, poverty, language barriers, age, disability, minority status, stigmatised conditions). The purpose of this paper is to prompt critical reflection on the nature of codesign research with vulnerable populations, including key issues to consider in the initial planning phases, the implementation process, and final outputs. Risks and tensions will be identified in each phase of the process, followed by a tool to foster reflexivity in codesign processes to address these issues.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Caixeta, Michele Caroline Bueno Ferrari, and Márcio Minto Fabricio. "Métodos e instrumentos de apoio ao codesign no processo de projeto de edifícios." Ambiente Construído 18, no. 1 (March 2018): 111–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s1678-86212018000100212.

Full text

Abstract:

Resumo O envolvimento efetivo dos usuários no processo de projeto (PP) traz diversos benefícios para esse processo, como a captura de suas reais necessidades e a legitimação das decisões de projeto, dentre outras descritas na literatura. Entretanto, os métodos e instrumentos para o emprego do codesign no PP ainda são incipientes e pouco divulgados, o que dificulta a disseminação dessa abordagem. O objetivo do presente artigo é, portanto, levantar métodos e instrumentos já utilizados em codesign com usuários, por meio de revisão bibliográfica e estudos de caso em empresas de projeto de arquitetura. Os resultados apontam a importância dos métodos e instrumentos, e que a principal questão metodológica do codesign é promover uma linguagem comum no projeto, para que tanto usuários quanto profissionais de projeto possam entender e se expressar. Apontam ainda que o codesign é importante nas etapas iniciais do PP, em que os métodos e instrumentos foram empregados. A pesquisa contribui para enriquecer a literatura disponível sobre o assunto e disseminá-la para os arquitetos, projetistas e pesquisadores, facilitando a comunicação entre usuários e equipe de profissionais no PP, na busca pela melhoria da qualidade do processo e do edifício projetado.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

Woodcock, Andree, Jacquie Bridgman, Kat Gut, Paul Magee, Sinead Ouillon, Janet Saunders, and Nicola York. "Increasing gender sensitivity with codesign." International Conference on Gender Research 5, no. 1 (April 13, 2022): pp266–273. http://dx.doi.org/10.34190/icgr.5.1.177.

Full text

Abstract:

The Horizon Europe 2020 TInnGO (Transport Innovation Gender Observatory) project1 aimed to facilitate and empower the inclusion of underrepresented and diverse groups in smart mobility. Women are still considered to be an underrepresented group across the transport sector, forming less than 30% of all employees in the sector. Significantly women’s travel needs are not met by current transport provision, despite widespread evidence that they make different types of journeys and have different mobility concerns. It may hypothesised that even less is known about other minority groups (such as those from the BAME (Black, Asian, Minority and Ethnic community and those with disabilities). The design of future transport services and products is further skewed by the predominance of male undergraduate transport designers and engineers. While there are many noteworthy attempts to attract young women into STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) careers and provide support for them in the male dominated sector, the work conducted by TInnGO’s Coventry team focussed on developing gender and diversity sensitive smart mobility solutions to highlight everyday mobility issues for women. These have been termed ‘Design provocations,’ 50 such designs were produced over 18 months in conjunction with 4 undergraduate design interns and are available for comment on our Open Innovation Platform2. From this experience, the team have produced a series of design tools to facilitate undergraduate student’s empathy and awareness when designing gender and diversity sensitive smart mobility products. [1] https://www.tinngo.eu/ [2] https://oip.transportgenderobservatory.eu/home

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

De Micheli, G. "Computer-aided hardware-software codesign." IEEE Micro 14, no. 4 (August 1994): 10–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/40.296153.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Wahlen, Oliver, Tilman Glökler, Achim Nohl, Andreas Hoffmann, Rainer Leupers, and Heinrich Meyr. "Application specific compiler/architecture codesign." ACM SIGPLAN Notices 37, no. 7 (July 17, 2002): 185–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/566225.513861.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Pedersen, Jens. "War and peace in codesign." CoDesign 12, no. 3 (December 2, 2015): 171–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1112813.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

Censi, Andrea. "Uncertainty in Monotone Codesign Problems." IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 2, no. 3 (July 2017): 1556–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/lra.2017.2674970.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Prajapati, Nirmal, Sanjay Rajopadhye, Hristo Djidjev, Nandakishore Santhi, Tobias Grosser, and Rumen Andonov. "Optimization Approach to Accelerator Codesign." IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems 39, no. 6 (June 2020): 1300–1313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/tcad.2019.2926489.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Madsen, J., J. Steensgaard-Madsen, and L. M. Christensen. "A Sophomore Course in Codesign." Computer 35, no. 11 (November 2002): 108–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mc.2002.1046983.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

Färber, G. "Hardware-Software-Codesign eingebetteter Systeme." e & i Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik 115, no. 3 (March 1998): 128–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf03159563.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Petrulaityte, Aine, Fabrizio Ceschin, Josephine Kaviti Musango, Betty Karimi Mwiti, Christer Anditi, and Peris Njoroge. "Supporting the Development of Gendered Energy Innovations for Informal Urban Settlements: GENS Codesign Toolkit for Multistakeholder Collaboration." Sustainability 14, no. 10 (May 21, 2022): 6291. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su14106291.

Full text

Abstract:

There is still little knowledge about the link between gender mainstreaming and energy security in informal urban settlements and there is limited design support to address this linkage. This paper presents the development and evaluation of the Gender for Energy Security (GENS) codesign toolkit, which was made to facilitate the design of gendered energy innovations for informal urban settlements. The toolkit was developed by applying the Design Research Methodology (DRM) and is grounded in the findings of a literature review, semi-structured interviews and ethnographic fieldwork in two informal urban settlements. The toolkit aimed to support codesign processes by providing its users with knowledge about the gendered energy scene in informal urban settlements and facilitating idea generation for gendered urban energy innovations. The evaluation of the GENS codesign toolkit was conducted during a one-day multistakeholder codesign workshop in Nairobi, Kenya. During the testing, we found that the toolkit was successful in facilitating energetic discussions, helping its users to learn about the gender–energy nexus in informal urban settlements and generate original ideas for gendered energy innovations. The toolkit is an addition to the current tools, handbooks and manuals on mainstreaming gender in the energy sector, with a unique focus on informal urban settlements and supporting idea generation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Harrison, Reema, Merrilyn Walton, Elizabeth Manias, Carlene Wilson, Afaf Girgis, Melvin Chin, Desiree Leone, Holly Seale, Allan Ben Smith, and Ashfaq Chauhan. "Codesigning consumer engagement strategies with ethnic minority consumers in Australian cancer services: the CanEngage Project protocol." BMJ Open 11, no. 8 (August 2021): e048389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048389.

Full text

Abstract:

IntroductionConsumer engagement is central to high-quality cancer service delivery and is a recognised strategy to minimise healthcare-associated harm. Strategies developed to enhance consumer engagement specifically in relation to preventing healthcare harm include questioning health professionals, raising concerns about possible mistakes or risks in care and encouraging patients and caregivers to report suspected errors. Patients from ethnic minority backgrounds are particularly vulnerable to unsafe care, but current engagement strategies have not been developed specifically for (and with) this population. Using an adapted approach to experience-based codesign (EBCD) to support the target population, the aim of the project is to codesign consumer engagement interventions to increase consumer engagement and safety in New South Wales and Victorian cancer inpatient, outpatient and day procedure services.Methods and analysisA mixed-method project will be undertaken at six study sites. Our EBCD approach includes a preparatory phase in which we will provide training and support to the codesign participants, in addition to recruiting and training consumer cofacilitators for the codesign workshops. The project will follow the EBCD process of gathering and synthesising observational data from each cancer service, with interview data from consumers and staff. With the resulting in-depth understanding of the safety threats commonly experienced by ethnic minority consumers in each site, we will work through feedback events and codesign groups with consumers and staff to determine how they can be more involved with their care to minimise the potential for patient harm. Consumer engagement interventions will be coproduced in each of the six participating services that are tailored to the ethnic minority populations served.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval has been obtained from the Western Sydney Local Health District Human Research Ethics Committee. The project will provide strategies for ethnic minority consumers to engage with cancer services to minimise healthcare-associated harm that may be applied to diverse healthcare settings.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Beattie, Michelle, Clare Morrison, Rebecah MacGilleEathain, Nicola Gray, and Julie Anderson. "Near Me at Home: codesigning the use of video consultations for outpatient appointments in patients’ homes." BMJ Open Quality 9, no. 3 (August 2020): e001035. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001035.

Full text

Abstract:

Reforming the delivery of outpatient appointments (OPA) was high on the healthcare policy agenda prior to COVID-19. The current pandemic exacerbates the financial and associated resource limitations of OPA. Videoconsulting provides a safe method of real-time contact for some remotely residing patients with hospital-based clinicians. One factor in failing to move from introduction of service change to its general adoption may be lack of patient and public involvement. This project, based in the largest Island in the Inner Hebrides of Scotland, aimed to codesign the use of the NHS Near Me video consulting platform for OPA to take place in the patient’s home. A codesign model was used as a framework. This included: step 1—presenting a process flow map of the current system of using Near Me to public participants and establishing their ideas on various steps in the process, step 2—conducting numerous Plan, Do, Study, Act (PDSA) tests and creating a current process flow diagram based on learning and step 3—conducting telephone interviews and thematic analysis of transcripts (n=7) to explore participants’ perceptions of being involved in the codesign process. Twenty-five adaptations were made to the Near Me at Home video appointment process from participants’ PDSA testing. Four themes were identified from thematic analysis of participants’ feedback of the codesign process, namely: altruistic motivation, valuing community voices, the usefulness of the PDSA cycles and the power of ‘word of mouth’. By codesigning the use of Near Me with people living in a remote area of Scotland, multiple adaptations were made to the processes to suit the context in which Near Me at Home will be used. Learning from testing and adapting with the public will likely be useful for others embarking on codesign approaches to improve spread and sustainability of quality improvement projects.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Verbiest, Marjolein E. A., Callie Corrigan, Sally Dalhousie, Ridvan Firestone, Tevita Funaki, Debbie Goodwin, Jacqui Grey, et al. "Using codesign to develop a culturally tailored, behavior change mHealth intervention for indigenous and other priority communities: A case study in New Zealand." Translational Behavioral Medicine 9, no. 4 (November 2, 2018): 720–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tbm/iby093.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract The obesity rate in New Zealand is one of the highest worldwide (31%), with highest rates among Māori (47%) and Pasifika (67%). Codesign was used to develop a culturally tailored, behavior change mHealth intervention for Māori and Pasifika in New Zealand. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview of the codesign methods and processes and describe how these were used to inform and build a theory-driven approach to the selection of behavioral determinants and change techniques. The codesign approach in this study was based on a partnership between Māori and Pasifika partners and an academic research team. This involved working with communities on opportunity identification, elucidation of needs and desires, knowledge generation, envisaging the mHealth tool, and prototype testing. Models of Māori and Pasifika holistic well-being and health promotion were the basis for identifying key content modules and were applied to relevant determinants of behavior change and theoretically based behavior change techniques from the Theoretical Domains Framework and Behavior Change Taxonomy, respectively. Three key content modules were identified: physical activity, family/whānau [extended family], and healthy eating. Other important themes included mental well-being/stress, connecting, motivation/support, and health literacy. Relevant behavioral determinants were selected, and 17 change techniques were mapped to these determinants. Community partners established that a smartphone app was the optimal vehicle for the intervention. Both Māori and Pasifika versions of the app were developed to ensure features and functionalities were culturally tailored and appealing to users. Codesign enabled and empowered users to tailor the intervention to their cultural needs. By using codesign and applying both ethnic-specific and Western theoretical frameworks of health and behavior change, the mHealth intervention is both evidence based and culturally tailored.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Journal articles on the topic 'Codesign'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles