Academic literature on the topic 'Codesign'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Codesign.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Codesign"

1

Brighton, Lisa Jane, Nannette Spain, Jose Gonzalez-Nieto, Karen A. Ingram, Jennifer Harvey, William D.-C. Man, and Claire M. Nolan. "Remote pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease: developing the model using experience-based codesign." BMJ Open Respiratory Research 11, no. 1 (February 2024): e002061. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2023-002061.

Full text
Abstract:
BackgroundRemote delivery may improve access to pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Existing studies are largely limited to individuals with COPD, and the interventions have lacked codesign elements to reflect the needs and experiences of people with chronic respiratory disease, their carers/families and healthcare professionals. The aim of this study was, using experience-based codesign (EBCD), to collaborate with people with interstitial lung disease (ILD), their carers/families and healthcare professionals, to codesign a remote PR programme ready for testing in a future study.MethodsEBCD comprises interviews, stakeholder workshops and codesign meetings. One-to-one videorecorded interviews with purposively selected people with ILD with experience of PR, their carers/families and healthcare professionals, were edited into a 20 min film. The film was shown at three audiorecorded stakeholder feedback events to identify key themes and touchpoints, and short-list key programme components. The programme was finalised at two further codesign workshops.ResultsTen people with ILD, four carers/families and seven healthcare professionals were interviewed. Participants in the codesign workshops included service-user group: n=14 and healthcare professional group: n=11; joint event: n=21. Final refinements were made with small codesign teams, one comprising three people with ILD and one carer/family member, one with five healthcare professionals. The final codesigned model is a group based, supervised programme delivered by videoconference. Key elements of programme specific to ILD include recommendations to ensure participant safety in the context of desaturation risk, dedicated time for peer support and adaption of the education programme for ILD needs, including signposting to palliative care.ConclusionIn this EBCD project, a remote PR programme for people with ILD was codesigned by service-users, their carers/families and multidisciplinary healthcare professionals. Future research should explore the feasibility and acceptability of this intervention.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

McKercher, Jonathan P., Susan C. Slade, Jalal A. Jazayeri, Anita Hodge, Matthew Knight, Janet Green, Jeffrey Woods, Claire Thwaites, and Meg E. Morris. "Patient experiences of codesigned rehabilitation interventions in hospitals: a rapid review." BMJ Open 12, no. 11 (November 2022): e068241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068241.

Full text
Abstract:
BackgroundCodesign strengthens partnerships between healthcare workers and patients. It also facilitates collaborations supporting the development, design and delivery of healthcare services. Prior rehabilitation reviews have focused mainly on the clinical and organisational outcomes of codesign with less focus on the lived experience of rehabilitation patients.ObjectiveTo explore patient experiences of codesigned hospital rehabilitation interventions.DesignRapid review and evidence synthesis of the literature.Data sourcesCINAHL, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane were searched from 1 January 2000 to 25 April 2022.Study selectionStudies reporting patient experiences of codesigned rehabilitation interventions in hospitals.Results4156 studies were screened, and 38 full-text studies were assessed for eligibility. Seven studies were included in the final rapid review. Five out of the seven studies involved neurological rehabilitation. All eligible studies used qualitative research methods. The main barriers to codesign were related to staffing and dedicated time allocated to face-to-face patient-therapist interactions. High-quality relationships between patients and their therapists were a facilitator of codesign. Thematic synthesis revealed that codesigned rehabilitation interventions can enable a meaningful experience for patients and facilitate tailoring of treatments to align with individual needs. Personalised rehabilitation increases patient involvement in rehabilitation planning, delivery and decision-making. It also promotes positive feelings of empowerment and hope.ConclusionThis rapid review supports the implementation of codesigned rehabilitation interventions to improve patient experiences in hospitals.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42021264547.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Schäfer, Louis, Laura Burkhardt, Andreas Kuhnle, and Gisela Lanza. "Integriertes Produkt-Produktions-Codesign/Integrated product-production codesign." wt Werkstattstechnik online 111, no. 04 (2021): 201–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.37544/1436-4980-2021-04-23.

Full text
Abstract:
Eine steigende Variantenvielfalt, hohe Marktvolatilität und heterogene Prozesslandschaften betonen die Bedeutung einer simultanen Betrachtung von Produkt- und Produktionssystem für produzierende Unternehmen. Vor dem Hintergrund einer wandlungsfähigen Produktionsplanung und -steuerung stellt dieser Beitrag eine Methodik zur Implementierung eines integrierten Produkt-Produktions-Codesigns vor. Bestandteile sind ein ganzheitliches Änderungsmanagement und die Identifikation von Lösungsmustern.   An increasing number of variants, high market volatility, and heterogeneous process landscapes emphasize the importance of a simultaneous consideration of product and production for manufacturing companies. Against the background of adaptive production planning and control (PPC), this paper proposes a methodology for implementing an integrated product-production-Codesign, consisting of a holistic analysis of changes and their impact on the system, as well as the identification of solution patterns.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Crowther, Lucia, Mark Pearson, Helena Cummings, and Michael George Crooks. "Towards codesign in respiratory care: development of an implementation-ready intervention to improve guideline-adherent adult asthma care across primary and secondary care settings (The SENTINEL Project)." BMJ Open Respiratory Research 9, no. 1 (February 2022): e001155. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2021-001155.

Full text
Abstract:
Short-acting beta agonist (SABA) overuse (≥3 canisters annually) is associated with worse asthma outcomes and accounts for the majority of greenhouse gas emissions from asthma inhalers in England. Reducing SABA overuse aligns with the National Health Service long-term plan to optimise asthma treatment while minimising environmental impact, but adoption of local asthma guidelines for a SABA-free maintenance and reliever therapy strategy for step 3 asthma patients is limited. In this Perspective, we describe patient and staff involvement in a codesign process adapted from experience-based codesign (EBCD) principles to develop an implementation-ready intervention within a practice-relevant timescale.The codesigned intervention consists of five pillars: healthcare professional education; implementation of ‘gold standard’ prescribing practices; targeted asthma reviews; patient education and support; and real-time data monitoring and reporting of asthma care metrics. The codesign process contributed to all pillars and, by identifying potential individual and organisational barriers to implementation, enabled the development of plans to address these barriers.In this Perspective, we reflect on the strengths and weaknesses of our codesign process, outline how EBCD principles can be used in respiratory research and propose actions for patients, health professionals, researchers and funders to develop the potential of EBCD in respiratory research.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Tomesh, Teague, and Margaret Martonosi. "Quantum Codesign." IEEE Micro 41, no. 5 (September 1, 2021): 33–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mm.2021.3094461.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Jagtap, Santosh. "Codesign in resource-limited societies: theoretical perspectives, inputs, outputs and influencing factors." Research in Engineering Design 33, no. 2 (February 3, 2022): 191–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00163-022-00384-1.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractCodesign with resource-constrained people living in developing countries is crucial for sustained adoption and use of designed solutions. Several studies have investigated codesign with resource-constrained people. It is, therefore, important to understand what has been investigated and learnt so far as well as to plan for further scholarly exploration of this field. To address this, I applied a systematic literature review (SLR) approach to understand main sources, definitions, and theoretical perspectives regarding codesign with resource-constrained people. The SLR also aimed to understand inputs and outputs of codesign as well as factors influencing the codesign process. The findings portray a multifaceted picture regarding these aspects of codesign. I discuss implications of review findings for the practice of codesigning solutions with resource-constrained people, identify concerns that researchers should have about this field, and offer suggestions for future research in this field of codesign.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Wright, Lucy C., Natalia Lopez Chemas, and Claudia Cooper. "Lived experience codesign of self-harm interventions: a scoping review." BMJ Open 13, no. 12 (December 2023): e079090. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079090.

Full text
Abstract:
ObjectivesThis study aims to map existing literature describing how people with lived experience of self-harm have engaged in codesigning self-harm interventions, understand barriers and facilitators to this engagement, and how the meaningfulness of codesign has been evaluated.DesignScoping review by Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. A protocol was published online (http://dx.doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/P52UD).Data sourcesPubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PROSPERO, ClinicalTrials.gov and relevant websites were searched on 24 December 2022 (repeated 4 November 2023).Eligibility criteriaWe included studies where individuals with lived experience of self-harm (first-hand or caregiver) have codesigned self-harm interventions.Data extraction and synthesisResults were screened at title and abstract level, then full-text level by two researchers independently. Prespecified data were extracted, charted and sorted into themes.ResultsWe included 22 codesigned interventions across mobile health, educational settings, prisons and emergency departments. Involvement varied from designing content to multistage involvement in planning, delivery and dissemination. Included papers described the contribution of 159 female, 39 male and 21 transgender or gender diverse codesigners. Few studies included contributors from a minoritised ethnic or LGBTQIA+ group. Six studies evaluated how meaningfully people with lived experience were engaged in codesign: by documenting the impact of contributions on intervention design or through postdesign reflections. Barriers included difficulties recruiting inclusively, making time for meaningful engagement in stretched services and safeguarding concerns for codesigners. Explicit processes for ensuring safety and well-being, flexible schedules, and adequate funding facilitated codesign.ConclusionsTo realise the potential of codesign to improve self-harm interventions, people with lived experience must be representative of those who use services. This requires processes that reassure potential contributors and referrers that codesigners will be safeguarded, remunerated, and their contributions used and valued.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Rojo, Jacqueline, Ajesh George, Yenna Salamonson, Leanne Hunt, and Lucie M. Ramjan. "Using Codesign to Develop a Novel Oral Healthcare Educational Intervention for Undergraduate Nursing Students." International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 6 (March 10, 2023): 4919. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20064919.

Full text
Abstract:
To build a nursing workforce that is equipped to undertake oral health promotion and screening, an educational program was needed. With codesign being used in multiple settings, it was selected as the approach to use, with Mezirow’s Transformative Learning theory as the underpinning framework. This study aimed to develop an oral healthcare educational intervention for nursing students. Using a six-step codesign framework, nursing students and faculty staff were invited to participate in two Zoom™ Video Communication workshops to codesign the learning activities to be used in the classroom. The codesign process was evaluated through focus groups and analysed using a hybrid content analysis approach. A multifaceted oral healthcare educational intervention was developed. Learning material was delivered using a range of different learning and teaching resources such as dental models, podcasts, and an oral health assessment across two subjects. Multiple approaches to recruitment, the inclusion of participants, and good facilitation of workshop discussions were critical to the codesign of the educational intervention. Evaluation revealed that preparing participants prior to the workshops acted as a catalyst for conversations, which facilitated the codesign process. Codesign was a useful approach to employ in the development of an oral healthcare intervention to address an area of need.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Gupta, P. "Hardware-software codesign." IEEE Potentials 20, no. 5 (2002): 31–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/45.983337.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Jerraya, A. "Hardware-software codesign." IEEE Design and Test of Computers 17, no. 1 (January 2000): 92–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mdt.2000.825680.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Codesign"

1

Dove, G. "CoDesign with data." Thesis, City University London, 2015. http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/14902/.

Full text
Abstract:
Design is a process of changing current situations into preferred ones, through conversations with design materials, and an understanding of the present practice of the designed artefact’s future users. Domain-relevant data, such as those generated by personal and autonomous computing systems, are an increasingly important design material presenting new ways to explore current practice. Examples of these data include that being generated by people using smartphones, health and fitness monitors, smart energy meters and social media; or that from official statistics made publicly available via Open Data initiatives. This thesis details research developing CoDesign With Data, a novel approach to collaborative early-stage design workshops in which working with domain-relevant data is the key distinguishing feature. During a CoDesign With Data workshop participants are given the tools and techniques to help them seek insight from data, gain an understanding of the context these data might come from, and to inspire creative design ideas. These tools and techniques build on an understanding of research into information visualization and applied creativity. The activities in which they are used build on the experiences reported from other approaches to creativity in collaborative requirements gathering and design workshops. The aim of this research is to support design innovation that results in new products or services appropriate to the contexts in which they will be used. To investigate the primary research question, and evaluate the tools and techniques being developed, two design experiments and three case studies were undertaken. In each study, examples of tools, in the form of workshop materials and information visualization interfaces, and techniques, in the form of workshop activities, are presented, and simple takeaways for design practice are offered. Finally, the knowledge and understanding gained during this research is presented as a series of guidelines and recommendations, and a description of the current state-of-the-art CoDesign With Data workshop.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Soldner, Wolfgang Wilhelm. "HF-ESD-Codesign." Aachen Shaker, 2009. http://d-nb.info/996579168/04.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Hilton, Adrian J. "High integrity hardware-software codesign." Thesis, Open University, 2004. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.402249.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Cai, Jianming. "An object-based codesign methodology." Thesis, Sheffield Hallam University, 2001. http://shura.shu.ac.uk/19418/.

Full text
Abstract:
The research into Codesign of Hardware and Software stems from the development of embedded systems, on which various systems restrictions are imposed. Typical restrictions can be the overall time (latency) to complete an assigned function and the space/power limits within the system. Although software can be used to undertake most tasks in an embedded system, ASIC (Application Specific Integrated Circuits) hardware components sometimes have to be recruited to meet the system constraints. Designing the restricted embedded system with both software and hardware components in it involves the analysis of not only individual hardware/software components but also their mutual influences. Using co-design principles, the approach is to consider both hardware and software from a coherent viewpoint. This thesis presents the results from our research project in the area of Codesign of Hardware and Software. In this project, we investigated previously published codesign approaches and their methodological supports. The investigation has identified shortcomings and problems with the existing codesign methodologies. A new object-based codesign approach (Co-PARSE) is thus developed in this project, which is supported by successive phases, guidelines, and techniques. This methodology offers a coherent design framework for real-time embedded systems and incorporates the criteria of system performance and hardware cost. Tools have been developed to facilitate the use of the methodology. Within the methodology, a high-level system modeling and specification approach has been developed and formalised in the Co-BSL (Codesign Behavior Specification Language). The means of transforming Co-BSL specifications to C and VHDL implementations is defined, and a library of VHDL components provided. The thesis documents the partitioning approach taken within the methodology and proposes a new multi-layered bus architecture as a basis for more flexible and efficient implementations. A means of simulating the performance characteristics of this architecture under different configurations is provided, and examples of simulation results are presented. A new embedded system (the Radio Data Computing System) is designed and simulated in the Co-PARSE methodology and simulation results analysed. The thesis concludes with an evaluation of the work carried out in the project and proposals for extending the results obtained in future research. The major contributions reported in this thesis can be summarised as follows. First, the unified system specification means has been designed, which is embodied in the Co-BSL. It captures overall dynamic aspects and performance constraints in the system under development. This high-level specification language is independent of implementation and does not bias the designer towards the use of hardware or software components at this early stage. Second, within Co-PARSE, the target architecture of the system under development has been exploited to improve the system performance and at the same time to reduce hardware cost. This novel concept has been realised by the introduction of an asynchronous bus protocol and the multi-layer bus communication structure. Third, in order to evaluate the strength and practicability of the Co-PARSE methodology, an extensive case study has been carried out. The new RDC (Radio Dada Computing) System has been designed in the proposed codesign approach. Codesign phases are subsequently applied and the guidelines and tools that are specially developed in support of the methodology are fully utilized.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Bambha, Neal Kumar. "Communication-driven codesign for multiprocessor systems." College Park, Md. : University of Maryland, 2004. http://hdl.handle.net/1903/1429.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (Ph. D.) -- University of Maryland, College Park, 2004.
Thesis research directed by: Electrical Engineering. Title from t.p. of PDF. Includes bibliographical references. Published by UMI Dissertation Services, Ann Arbor, Mich. Also available in paper.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Soldner, Wolfgang W. [Verfasser]. "HF ESD CODESIGN / Wolfgang W Soldner." Aachen : Shaker, 2009. http://d-nb.info/1159834857/34.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

King, Myron Decker. "A methodology for hardware-software codesign." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/84891.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2013.
Cataloged from PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (pages 150-156).
Special purpose hardware is vital to embedded systems as it can simultaneously improve performance while reducing power consumption. The integration of special purpose hardware into applications running in software is difficult for a number of reasons. Some of the difficulty is due to the difference between the models used to program hardware and software, but great effort is also required to coordinate the simultaneous execution of the application running on the microprocessor with the accelerated kernel(s) running in hardware. To further compound the problem, current design methodologies for embedded applications require an early determination of the design partitioning which allows hardware and software to be developed simultaneously, each adhering to a rigid interface contract. This approach is problematic because often a good hardware-software decomposition is not known until deep into the design process. Fixed interfaces and the burden of reimplementation prevent the migration of functionality motivated by repartitioning. This thesis presents a two-part solution to the integration of special purpose hardware into applications running in software. The first part addresses the problem of generating infrastructure for hardware-accelerated applications. We present a methodology in which the application is represented as a dataflow graph and the computation at each node is specified for execution either in software or as specialized hardware using the programmer's language of choice. An interface compiler as been implemented which takes as input the FIFO edges of the graph and generates code to connect all the different parts of the program, including those which communicate across the hardware/software boundary. This methodology, which we demonstrate on an FPGA platform, enables programmers to effectively exploit hardware acceleration without ever leaving the application space. The second part of this thesis presents an implementation of the Bluespec Codesign Language (BCL) to address the difficulty of experimenting with hardware/software partitioning alternatives. Based on guarded atomic actions, BCL can be used to specify both hardware and low-level software. Based on Bluespec SystemVerilog (BSV) for which a hardware compiler by Bluespec Inc. is commercially available, BCL has been augmented with extensions to support more efficient software generation. In BCL, the programmer specifies the entire design, including the partitioning, allowing the compiler to synthesize efficient software and hardware, along with transactors for communication between the partitions. The benefit of using a single language to express the entire design is that a programmer can easily experiment with many different hardware/software decompositions without needing to re-write the application code. Used together, the BCL and interface compilers represent a comprehensive solution to the task of integrating specialized hardware into an application.
by Myron King.
Ph.D.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Dave, Nirav Hemant 1982. "A unified model for hardware/software codesign." Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/68171.

Full text
Abstract:
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2011.
This electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.
Cataloged from student submitted PDF version of thesis.
Includes bibliographical references (p. 179-188).
Embedded systems are almost always built with parts implemented in both hardware and software. Market forces encourage such systems to be developed with dierent hardware-software decompositions to meet dierent points on the price-performance-power curve. Current design methodologies make the exploration of dierent hardware-software decompositions difficult because such exploration is both expensive and introduces signicant delays in time-to-market. This thesis addresses this problem by introducing, Bluespec Codesign Language (BCL), a united language model based on guarded atomic actions for hardware-software codesign. The model provides an easy way of specifying which parts of the design should be implemented in hardware and which in software without obscuring important design decisions. In addition to describing BCL's operational semantics, we formalize the equivalence of BCL programs and use this to mechanically verify design refinements. We describe the partitioning of a BCL program via computational domains and the compilation of dierent computational domains into hardware and software, respectively.
by Nirav Dave.
Ph.D.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Hauff, Martin Anthony, and marty@extendabilities com au. "Compiler Directed Codesign for FPGA-based Embedded Systems." RMIT University. Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2008. http://adt.lib.rmit.edu.au/adt/public/adt-VIT20081202.141333.

Full text
Abstract:
As embedded systems designers increasingly turn to programmable logic technologies in place of off-the-shelf microprocessors, there is a growing interest in the development of optimised custom processing cores that can be designed on a per-application basis. FPGAs blur the traditional distinction between hardware and software and offer the promise of application specific hardware acceleration. But realizing this in a general sense requires a significant departure from traditional embedded systems development flows. Whereas off-the-shelf processors have a fixed architecture, the same cannot be said of purpose-built FPGA-based processors. With this freedom comes the challenge of empirically determining the optimal boundary point between hardware and software. The fluidity of the hardware/software partition also poses an interesting challenge for compiler developers. This thesis presents a tool and methodology that addresses these codesign challenges in a new way. Described as 'compiler-directed codesign', it makes use of a suitably modified compiler to help direct the development of a custom processor core on a per-application basis. By exposing the compiler's internal representation of a compiled target program, visibility into those instructions, and hardware resources, that are most sought after by the compiler can be gained. This information is then used to inform further processor development and to determine the optimal partition between hardware and software. At each design iteration, the machine model is updated to reflect the available hardware resources, the compiler is rebuilt, and the target application is compiled once again. By including the compiler 'in-the-loop' of custom processor design, developers can accurately quantify the impact on performance caused by the addition or removal of specific hardware resources and iteratively converge on an optimal solution. Compiler Directed Codesign has advantages over existing codesign methodologies because it offers both a concrete point from which to begin the partitioning process as well as providing quantifiable and rapid feedback of the merits of different partitioning choices. When applied to an Adaptive PCM Encoder/Decoder case study, the Compiler Directed Codesign technique yielded a custom processor core that was between 36% and 73% smaller, consumed between 11% to 19% less memory, and performed up to 10X faster than comparable general-purpose FPGA-based processor cores. The conclusion of this work is that a suitably modified compiler can serve a valuable role in directing hardware/software partitioning on a per-application basis.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Iqbal, Arshad. "VoIP Server HW/SW Codesign for Multicore Computing." Thesis, KTH, Skolan för informations- och kommunikationsteknik (ICT), 2012. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-94203.

Full text
Abstract:
Modern technologies are growing and Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) technology is able to function in heterogeneous networks. VoIP gained wide popularity because it offers cheap calling rates compared to traditional telephone system and the number of VoIP subscribers has increased significantly in recent years. End users need reliable and acceptable call quality in real time communication with best Quality of Service (QoS). Server complexity is increasing to handle all client requests simultaneously and needs huge processing power. VoIP Servers will increase processing power but the engineering tradeoff needs to be considered e.g. increasing hardware will increase hardware complexity, energy consumption, network management, space requirement and overall system complexity. Modern System-on-Chip (SoC) uses multiple core technology to resolve the complexity of hardware computation. With enterprises needing to reduce overall costs while simultaneously improving call setup time, the amalgamation of VoIP with SoC can play a major role in the business market. The proposed VoIP Server model with multiple processing capabilities embedded in it is tailored for multicore hardware to achieve the required result. The model uses SystemC-2.2.0 and TLM-2.0 as a platform and consists of three main modules. TLM is built on top of SystemC in an overlay architectural fashion. SystemC provides a bridge between software and hardware co-design and increases HW & SW productivity, driven by fast concurrent programming in real time. The proposed multicore VoIP Server model implements a round robin algorithm to distribute transactions between cores and clients via Load Balancer. Primary focus of the multicore model is the processing of call setup time delays on a VoIP Server. Experiments were performed using OpenSIP Server to measure Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) messages and call setup time processing delays. Simulations were performed at the KTH Ferlin system and based on the theoretical measurements from the OpenSIP Server experiments. Results of the proposed multicore VoIP Server model shows improvement in the processing of call setup time delays.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Codesign"

1

Selloni, Daniela. CoDesign for Public-Interest Services. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53243-1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Ha, Soonhoi, and Jürgen Teich, eds. Handbook of Hardware/Software Codesign. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7358-4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Wilberg, Jörg. Codesign for Real-Time Video Applications. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6081-4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Wilberg, Jörg. Codesign for Real-Time Video Applications. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Hurk, Joris van den. Hardware/software codesign: An industrial approach. Eindhoven: University of Eindhoven, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Wilberg, Jörg. Codesign for real-time video applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Schaumont, Patrick R. A Practical Introduction to Hardware/Software Codesign. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3737-6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Schaumont, Patrick R. A Practical Introduction to Hardware/Software Codesign. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-6000-9.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Tan, Woei-Wen. Hardware/software codesign of data encryption algorithms. Manchester: UMIST, 1996.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

A practical introduction to hardware/software codesign. New York: Springer, 2010.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Codesign"

1

Barkai, David. "Codesign." In Unmatched, 191–204. Boca Raton: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003038054-23.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Saïdi, Hassen, Victoria Stavridou, and Bruno Duterte. "Protocol Codesign." In Security Protocols, 106–13. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11542322_14.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Stavridou, Victoria. "Protocol Codesign." In Security Protocols, 114–18. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/11542322_15.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Kumar, Sanjaya, James H. Aylor, Barry W. Johnson, and WM A. Wulf. "Codesign Concepts." In The Codesign of Embedded Systems: A Unified Hardware/Software Representation, 65–94. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1293-2_4.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Gessler, Ralf. "Hardware-Software-Codesign." In Entwicklung Eingebetteter Systeme, 105–18. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-30549-9_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Ghribi, Ines, Riadh Ben Abdallah, Mohamed Khalgui, and Marco Platzner. "I-Codesign: A Codesign Methodology for Reconfigurable Embedded Systems." In Communications in Computer and Information Science, 153–74. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62569-0_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Hsieh, Harry, Felice Balarin, and Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli. "The Polis Codesign Framework." In Synchronous Equivalence, 11–22. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1659-0_2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Hsieh, Harry, Felice Balarin, and Alberto Sangiovanni-Vincentelli. "Codesign Finite State Machines." In Synchronous Equivalence, 23–39. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1659-0_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Wilberg, Jörg. "HTML-Based Codesign Framework." In Codesign for Real-Time Video Applications, 103–16. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-6081-4_6.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Gajski, Daniel D., Jianwen Zhu, and Rainer Dömer. "Essential Issues in Codesign." In Hardware/Software Co-Design: Principles and Practice, 1–45. Boston, MA: Springer US, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2649-7_1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Codesign"

1

Bang, Jae young, Daniel Popescu, George Edwards, Nenad Medvidovic, Naveen Kulkarni, Girish M. Rama, and Srinivas Padmanabhuni. "CoDesign." In the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1810295.1810341.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Abdelfattah, Mohamed S., Lukasz Dudziak, Thomas Chau, Royson Lee, Hyeji Kim, and Nicholas D. Lane. "Codesign-NAS." In FPGA '20: The 2020 ACM/SIGDA International Symposium on Field-Programmable Gate Arrays. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3373087.3375334.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Frens, Jenna, Lindsey Rasie, and Victoria Hollis. "Photography Community Codesign (a.k.a. Codesign in a Global Pandemic)." In CHI '22: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3503573.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Grattan, Brian, Greg Stitt, and Frank Vahid. "Codesign-extended applications." In the tenth international symposium. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/774789.774791.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Bittencourt, Gustavo, and Karine Freire. "Spirituality based codesign." In PDC 2022: Participatory Design Conference 2022. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3537797.3537810.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Estell, John K., and Thomas A. Owen. "Experiencing the codesign process." In the twenty-sixth SIGCSE technical symposium. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/199688.199709.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Russell, Jeffry T. "Program slicing for codesign." In the tenth international symposium. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/774789.774809.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Ewins, Jon P., Phil L. Watten, Martin White, Michael D. J. McNeill, and Paul F. Lister. "Codesign of graphics hardware accelerators." In the ACM SIGGRAPH/EUROGRAPHICS workshop. New York, New York, USA: ACM Press, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/258694.258727.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Wolf, Wayne H. "Hardware/software codesign for multimedia." In Optical Science, Engineering and Instrumentation '97, edited by Franklin T. Luk. SPIE, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.279506.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Imai, M. "Embedded tutorial: hardware/software codesign." In Proceedings of the ASP-DAC '99 Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference 1999 (Cat. No.99EX198). IEEE, 1999. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/aspdac.1999.760042.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Reports on the topic "Codesign"

1

Hoekstra, Robert J., Richard Frederick Barrett, Louis Howell, and David Daniel. FY14 Codesign Milestone Summary. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), September 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1171590.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Lewis, Cannada, Simon Hammond, and Jeremiah Wilke. Codesign for the Masses. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), February 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1769255.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Ang, James, Andrew Chien, Simon Hammond, Adolfy Hoisie, Ian Karlin, Scott Pakin, John Shalf, and Jeffrey Vetter. Reimagining Codesign for Advanced Scientific Computing: Report for the ASCR Workshop on Reimagining Codesign. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), October 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1822199.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Trott, Christian Robert, Simon David Hammond, Dennis Dinge, Paul T. Lin, Courtenay T. Vaughan, Jeanine Cook, Harold C. Edwards, Mahesh Rajan, and Robert J. Hoekstra. ASC Trilab L2 Codesign Milestone 2015. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), September 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1221176.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Eidenbenz, Stephan Johannes. Codesign Performance Prediction for Computational Physics 3rd Year Review. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), February 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1342839.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Ang, James, Andrew Chien, Si Hammond, Adolfy Hoisie, Ian Karlin, Scott Pakin, John Shalf, and Jeffrey Vetter. Position Papers for the ASCR Workshop on Reimagining Codesign. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), March 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1843574.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Cardwell, Suma, John Smith, and Douglas Crowder. AI-enhanced Codesign for Next-Generation Neuromorphic Circuits and Systems. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), September 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1889339.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Eidenbenz, Stephan Johannes, and Robert Joseph Zerr. Codesign Performance Prediction for Computational Physics 3rd Year Review Overview talk. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), February 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1342843.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Eidenbenz, Stephan Johannes. Scalable Codesign Performance Prediction for Computational Physics - Mid-Term- Appraisal: Overview Talk. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1237216.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Lewis, Cannada, Clayton Hughes, Simon Hammond, and Sivasankaran Rajamanickam. Using MLIR Framework for Codesign of ML Architectures Algorithms and Simulation Tools. Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI), January 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.2172/1764336.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography