Academic literature on the topic 'Cochlear Gain Reduction'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Cochlear Gain Reduction.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Cochlear Gain Reduction"

1

Strickland, Elizabeth A., Elin Roverud, and Kristina DeRoy Milvae. "Behavioral explorations of cochlear gain reduction." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 135, no. 4 (April 2014): 2384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4877882.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Strickland, Elizabeth A., Hayley Morris, Miranda Skaggs, William Salloom, and Alexis Holt. "Behavioral measures of cochlear gain reduction and gain reduction in with normal hearing or minimal cochlear hearing loss." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 143, no. 3 (March 2018): 1964. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.5036459.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Fletcher, Mark, Jessica de Boer, and Katrin Krumbholz. "Does reduction in cochlear gain explain the overshoot effect?" Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 129, no. 4 (April 2011): 2593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3588592.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Strickland, Elizabeth A., Anna Hopkins, Andrea Rayner, William B. Salloom, Miranda Skaggs, Nicole Mielnicki, Hayley Morris, and Alexis Holt. "Examining potential sources of variability in behavioral measures of cochlear gain and gain reduction in listeners with normal hearing or minimal cochlear hearing loss." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 151, no. 4 (April 2022): A221—A222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/10.0011120.

Full text
Abstract:
This study examined the relationship between clinical measures of auditory function and psychoacoustic measures related to cochlear function. Listeners’ audiometric thresholds for long tones ranged from well within the clinically normal range to just above this range. Where thresholds were elevated, other clinical tests were consistent with a cochlear origin. Because the medial olivocochlear reflex decreases cochlear gain in response to sound, measures were made with short stimuli. Signal frequencies were from 1 to 8 kHz. One point on the lower leg of the input/output function was measured by finding threshold masker level for a masker almost one octave below the signal frequency needed to mask a signal at 5 dB SL. Gain reduction was estimated by presenting a pink broadband noise precursor before the signal and masker and measuring the change in signal threshold as a function of precursor level. In a previous presentation, it was shown that the estimate of gain reduction decreased as quiet threshold increased, but was not solely determined by the amount of gain. In this presentation, the relationship between gain reduction and clinical otoacoustic emission and middle-ear muscle reflex measurements was examined to determine whether these explained some of the variability. [Work supported by NIH (NIDCD) R01 DC008327 (EAS) and NIH(NIDCD) T32 DC016853 (WBS).]
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Strickland, Elizabeth A., Alexis Holt, and Hayley Morris. "Cochlear gain reduction in listeners with borderline normal quiet thresholds." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 141, no. 5 (May 2017): 3897. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4988759.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Strickland, Elizabeth A., Miranda Skaggs, Anna Hopkins, Nicole Mielnicki, William B. Salloom, Hayley Morris, and Alexis Holt. "A summary of behavioral measures of cochlear gain and gain reduction in listeners with normal hearing or minimal cochlear hearing loss." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 149, no. 4 (April 2021): A106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/10.0004659.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Strickland, Elizabeth A., Miranda Skaggs, Nicole Mielnicki, William Salloom, Hayley Morris, and Alexis Holt. "Further analysis of behavioral measures of cochlear gain and gain reduction in listeners with normal hearing or minimal cochlear hearing loss." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 145, no. 3 (March 2019): 1878. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.5101797.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Kressner, Abigail A., Tobias May, and Torsten Dau. "Effect of Noise Reduction Gain Errors on Simulated Cochlear Implant Speech Intelligibility." Trends in Hearing 23 (January 2019): 233121651982593. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216519825930.

Full text
Abstract:
It has been suggested that the most important factor for obtaining high speech intelligibility in noise with cochlear implant (CI) recipients is to preserve the low-frequency amplitude modulations of speech across time and frequency by, for example, minimizing the amount of noise in the gaps between speech segments. In contrast, it has also been argued that the transient parts of the speech signal, such as speech onsets, provide the most important information for speech intelligibility. The present study investigated the relative impact of these two factors on the potential benefit of noise reduction for CI recipients by systematically introducing noise estimation errors within speech segments, speech gaps, and the transitions between them. The introduction of these noise estimation errors directly induces errors in the noise reduction gains within each of these regions. Speech intelligibility in both stationary and modulated noise was then measured using a CI simulation tested on normal-hearing listeners. The results suggest that minimizing noise in the speech gaps can improve intelligibility, at least in modulated noise. However, significantly larger improvements were obtained when both the noise in the gaps was minimized and the speech transients were preserved. These results imply that the ability to identify the boundaries between speech segments and speech gaps may be one of the most important factors for a noise reduction algorithm because knowing the boundaries makes it possible to minimize the noise in the gaps as well as enhance the low-frequency amplitude modulations of the speech.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

DeRoy Milvae, Kristina, and Elizabeth A. Strickland. "Psychoacoustic measurements of ipsilateral cochlear gain reduction as a function of signal frequency." Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 143, no. 5 (May 2018): 3114–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.5038254.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Zheng, Wenwen, Wei Cao, Shanwen Chen, Yifan Li, Yang Wang, Kun Yao, and Jianxin Qiu. "Change in Health-Related Quality of Life in Cochlear Implant Recipients in China." Journal of Healthcare Engineering 2022 (March 26, 2022): 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1770580.

Full text
Abstract:
Objective. The objective is to assess the benefit of cochlear implants in health-related quality of life among postlingually deaf adults in China. Methods. Seventy-one postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant users in one cochlear implant center in China participated in this study. The HUI3 questionnaire as a measurement evaluated their quality of life. A cross-sectional analysis was conducted. Results. Cochlear implant had made statistically significant improvements in quality of life among postlingually deaf adults. The HUI3 scores were significantly better in four attributes (hearing, speech, emotion, and pain) after a cochlear implant. A positive correlation between change in hearing and improvement in emotion was significant. The change in pain and improvement in emotion also had a positive correlation. The duration of HA and CI use had no impact on the gain in HUI3 scores, and the baseline of hearing and emotion state had an influence on HUI3 gain. Conclusion. This study found cochlear implant users had a greatly improved hearing, speech, emotion, and pain, which made statistically significant improvement in quality of life among postlingually deaf adults. There was a statistically significant association between the change of emotion state and improvement in hearing level. We also found a statistically significant correlation between the reduction of feeling in pain and improvement in emotion. The change of quality of life seemed to be influenced by the primary state of emotion and hearing. We believe the measurement HUI3 is suitable for these patients in China.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Cochlear Gain Reduction"

1

Fletcher, Mark, Jessica de Boer, and Katrin Krumbholz. "Is Overshoot Caused by an Efferent Reduction in Cochlear Gain?" In Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 65–72. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1590-9_8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Cochlear Gain Reduction"

1

Liu, Yi-Wen, Kuang-Yi Lin, and Yong-Zing Chen. "Frequency-domain analysis of cochlear gain reduction due to disruptions in the outer hair cell feedback loop." In ICA 2013 Montreal. ASA, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.4800710.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

He, Wenzhi, Nengheng Zheng, and Qinglin Meng. "The effect of gain thresholds on speech intelligibility for statistical model based noise reduction for cochlear implants: A simulation based verification." In 2016 10th International Symposium on Chinese Spoken Language Processing (ISCSLP). IEEE, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/iscslp.2016.7918459.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography