Relevant bibliographies by topics / Clinical Outcomes / Journal articles

Journal articles on the topic 'Clinical Outcomes'

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Clinical Outcomes.
Author: Grafiati
Published: 4 June 2021
Last updated: 21 February 2023

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Clinical Outcomes.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Horikawa, Y., N. Tsuchiya, K. Yuasa, S. Narita, M. Saito, K. Takayama, T. Nara, et al. "CLINICAL OUTCOMES." Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 41, no. 3 (March 1, 2011): i6—i17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyq254.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Tanash, M., P. A. Gonchar, L. Ababneh, and H. Mohidat. "Clinical and Refractive Outcomes after Penetrating Keratoplasty (PKP)." Modern technologies in ophtalmology, no. 5 (August 20, 2018): 312–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.25276/2312-4911-2018-5-312-314.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Lavee, J., R. A. Beaupre, and A. J. Morgan. "Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs): clinical applications and outcomes." Clinical and Experimental Surgery. Petrovsky journal 8, no. 3 (2020): 123–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.33029/2308-1198-2020-8-3-123-128.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Huang, Jeffrey, Adam Almaguer, and John Dennis Busowski. "Comparing Clinical Outcomes." Obstetrics & Gynecology 125 (May 2015): 75S. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000463157.35699.e2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Edwards, P., J. Riley, J. Brown, S. George, R. Fillingim, L. Waxenberg, J. Atchison, V. Wittmer, and M. Robinson. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.412.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Williams, D., P. Biswas, J. Kalbfleisch, R. Gracely, S. Chriscinske, and D. Clauw. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.413.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Palos, G., T. Mendoza, G. Mobley, S. Cantor, and C. Cleeland. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.414.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Butler, S., S. Budman, K. Fernandez, C. Benoit, and R. Jamison. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.415.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Gore, M., N. Brandenburg, E. Dukes, D. Hoffman, A. Snyder-Chavis, and K. Tai. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.416.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Fernando, S., M. Ryan, L. Gordon, A. Gordon, and R. Kern. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.417.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

Zelman, D., M. Gore, E. Dukes, K. Tai, and N. Brandenburg. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.418.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

Labus, J., B. Naliboff, E. Mayer, L. Chang, and C. Liu. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.419.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

Williams, V., M. Smith, and S. Fehnel. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.420.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

Laing Gibbard, L., B. Sessle, G. Zarb, and T. Dao. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.421.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

Black, P., D. Kim, P. Desjardins, and J. Jefferson. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.422.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

Hanley, M., M. Jensen, D. Cardenas, and J. Turner. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.423.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

Stanos, S., T. Houle, T. Remble, and R. Harden. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.424.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

Good, M., S. Huang, X. Cong, and Y. Seo. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.425.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

Davis, P., J. Reeves, and B. Naliboff. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.426.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

Zelman, D., E. Dukes, N. Brandenburg, A. Bostrom, and M. Gore. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.427.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

Vassiliev, D. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.428.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

Zimmerman, B. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.429.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

Bouhassira, D., N. Attal, F. Boureau, B. Brochet, J. Bruxelle, G. Cunin, J. Fermanian, et al. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.430.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

Brown, J., P. Edwards, S. George, R. Fillingim, L. Waxenberg, J. Atchison, H. Gremillion, and M. Robinson. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.431.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

Hutchison, R., and O. Gonzalez. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.432.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

Henderson, R., and M. Primack. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.433.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

Sonty, N., S. Chokhavatia, G. Griswold, H. Knotkova, and W. Clark. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.434.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

Roberts, D., R. Hamill-Ruth, B. Parker, S. Maximous, B. Clark, and K. Nelson. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.435.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

Stone, A. "Clinical outcomes measurement." Journal of Pain 5, no. 3 (April 2004): S9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpain.2004.02.572.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

McNeill, Jeanette Adams, Gwen D. Sherwood, Patricia L. Starck, and Cathy J. Thompson. "Assessing Clinical Outcomes." Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 16, no. 1 (July 1998): 29–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0885-3924(98)00034-7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

Price, Christopher P. "Delivering Clinical Outcomes." Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing & Technology 2, no. 3 (September 2003): 151–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00134384-200309000-00001.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

Martinez, Robin. "Clinical Trial Outcomes." JACC: Heart Failure 7, no. 3 (March 2019): 272–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2018.12.003.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

Pinzur, Michael S. "Measuring Clinical Outcomes." Foot & Ankle International 41, no. 10 (March 16, 2020): 1316–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1071100720913931.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

Rice, Michelle, and Jane Fellows. "Ostomy-Clinical Outcomes." Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing 36, Supplement (May 2009): S19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.won.0000351937.45189.41.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

Droste, Linda. "Ostomy-Clinical Outcomes." Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing 36, Supplement (May 2009): S40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.won.0000352004.00684.64.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

Giannino, Kerri, and Sharon Rivello. "Ostomy-Clinical Outcomes." Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing 36, Supplement (May 2009): S51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.won.0000352040.14146.bf.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

Svantesson, Eleonor, Eric Hamrin Senorski, Kate E. Webster, Jón Karlsson, Theresa Diermeier, Benjamin B. Rothrauff, Sean J. Meredith, et al. "Clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther Symposium ACL Injury Clinical Outcomes Consensus Group." Journal of ISAKOS: Joint Disorders & Orthopaedic Sports Medicine 5, no. 5 (July 22, 2020): 281–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jisakos-2020-000494.

Full text
Abstract:
PurposeA stringent outcome assessment is a key aspect for establishing evidence-based clinical guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury treatment. The aim of this consensus statement was to establish what data should be reported when conducting an ACL outcome study, what specific outcome measurements should be used and at what follow-up time those outcomes should be assessed.MethodsTo establish a standardised assessment of clinical outcome after ACL treatment, a consensus meeting including a multidisciplinary group of ACL experts was held at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, in June 2019. The group reached consensus on nine statements by using a modified Delphi method.ResultsIn general, outcomes after ACL treatment can be divided into four robust categories—early adverse events, patient-reported outcomes, ACL graft failure/recurrent ligament disruption, and clinical measures of knee function and structure. A comprehensive assessment following ACL treatment should aim to provide a complete overview of the treatment result, optimally including the various aspects of outcome categories. For most research questions, a minimum follow-up of 2 years with an optimal follow-up rate of 80% is necessary to achieve a comprehensive assessment. This should include clinical examination, any sustained re-injuries, validated knee-specific patient-reported outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaires. In the mid-term to long-term follow-up, the presence of osteoarthritis should be evaluated.ConclusionThis consensus paper provides practical guidelines for how the aforementioned entities of outcomes should be reported and suggests the preferred tools for a reliable and valid assessment of outcome after ACL treatment.Level of EvidenceLevel V.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

Svantesson, Eleonor, Eric Hamrin Senorski, Kate E. Webster, Jón Karlsson, Theresa Diermeier, Benjamin B. Rothrauff, Sean J. Meredith, et al. "Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: Panther Symposium ACL Injury Clinical Outcomes Consensus Group." Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine 8, no. 7 (July 1, 2020): 232596712093475. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967120934751.

Full text
Abstract:
A stringent outcome assessment is a key aspect of establishing evidence-based clinical guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury treatment. To establish a standardized assessment of clinical outcome after ACL treatment, a consensus meeting including a multidisciplinary group of ACL experts was held at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA, in June 2019. The aim was to establish a consensus on what data should be reported when conducting an ACL outcome study, what specific outcome measurements should be used, and at what follow-up time those outcomes should be assessed. The group reached consensus on 9 statements by using a modified Delphi method. In general, outcomes after ACL treatment can be divided into 4 robust categories: early adverse events, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), ACL graft failure/recurrent ligament disruption, and clinical measures of knee function and structure. A comprehensive assessment after ACL treatment should aim to provide a complete overview of the treatment result, optimally including the various aspects of outcome categories. For most research questions, a minimum follow-up of 2 years with an optimal follow-up rate of 80% is necessary to achieve a comprehensive assessment. This should include clinical examination, any sustained reinjuries, validated knee-specific PROs, and health-related quality of life questionnaires. In the midterm to long-term follow-up, the presence of osteoarthritis should be evaluated. This consensus paper provides practical guidelines for how the aforementioned entities of outcomes should be reported and suggests the preferred tools for a reliable and valid assessment of outcome after ACL treatment.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

Svantesson, Eleonor, Eric Hamrin Senorski, Kate E. Webster, Jón Karlsson, Theresa Diermeier, Benjamin B. Rothrauff, Sean J. Meredith, et al. "Clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament injury: panther symposium ACL injury clinical outcomes consensus group." Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 28, no. 8 (August 2020): 2415–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06061-x.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Purpose A stringent outcome assessment is a key aspect for establishing evidence-based clinical guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury treatment. The aim of this consensus statement was to establish what data should be reported when conducting an ACL outcome study, what specific outcome measurements should be used and at what follow-up time those outcomes should be assessed. Methods To establish a standardized approach to assessment of clinical outcome after ACL treatment, a consensus meeting including a multidisciplinary group of ACL experts was held at the ACL Consensus Meeting Panther Symposium, Pittsburgh, PA; USA, in June 2019. The group reached consensus on nine statements by using a modified Delphi method. Results In general, outcomes after ACL treatment can be divided into four robust categories—early adverse events, patient-reported outcomes, ACL graft failure/recurrent ligament disruption and clinical measures of knee function and structure. A comprehensive assessment following ACL treatment should aim to provide a complete overview of the treatment result, optimally including the various aspects of outcome categories. For most research questions, a minimum follow-up of 2 years with an optimal follow-up rate of 80% is necessary to achieve a comprehensive assessment. This should include clinical examination, any sustained re-injuries, validated knee-specific PROs and Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaires. In the mid- to long-term follow-up, the presence of osteoarthritis should be evaluated. Conclusion This consensus paper provides practical guidelines for how the aforementioned entities of outcomes should be reported and suggests the preferred tools for a reliable and valid assessment of outcome after ACL treatment. Level of evidence V.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

Langtry, Heather. "Epilepsy: clinical questions and clinical outcomes." Inpharma Weekly &NA;, no. 1101 (August 1997): 11–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00128413-199711010-00021.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

Burad, Pratik Atul, and Sangeeta Pednekar. "Clinical Presentation and Outcomes of Cardiac Arrhythmias in the Elderly." Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine and Surgery 5, no. 3 (2019): 117–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.21088/jcms.2454.7123.5319.2.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

Coyne, Karin S., and Kathleen W. Wyrwich. "ISPOR Task Force For Clinical Outcomes Assessment: Clinical Outcome Assessments: Conceptual Foundation—Report of The ISPOR Clinical Outcomes Assessment – Emerging Good Practices For Outcomes Research Task Force." Value in Health 18, no. 6 (September 2015): 739–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2015.09.2863.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

Esposito, Eleonora, Andrea Cipriani, and Corrado Barbui. "Outcome reporting bias in clinical trials." Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale 18, no. 1 (March 2009): 17–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1121189x00001408.

Full text
Abstract:
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are designed and powered to measure one single outcome, calledprimary outcome(Sibbald & Roland, 1998; Barbuiet al., 2007). The primary outcome is the pre-specified outcome of greatest clinical importance and is usually the one used in the sample size calculation (Accordini, 2007). In addition to the primary outcome, RCTs may have several other outcomes, calledsecondary outcomes. In contrast with the analysis of the primary outcome, the analysis of secondary outcomes and its interpretation may be complicated by at least two factors:1)the trial may not have enough statistical power to detect differences (so it is possible to incur in a type II error, that is failing to see a difference that is present);2)increasing the number of secondary outcomes generates the problem of multiplicity of analyses, that is the proliferation of possible comparisons in a trial (and increasing the number of comparisons increases the possibility to incur in a type I error, that is detecting significant differences by chance). For all these reasons, the results of the analysis of primary outcomes is considered less susceptible to bias than the analysis of secondary outcomes.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

Bateman, Chris. "SmartPhones improving clinical outcomes." South African Medical Journal 101, no. 1 (January 6, 2011): 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.7196/samj.4674.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

Ishikawa, Masaaki, Harukazu Hiraumi, Norio Yamamoto, Tatsunori Sakamoto, Shinichi Kanemaru, and Juichi Ito. "Clinical Outcomes Cochlear Reimplantation." Nippon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho 114, no. 5 (2011): 498–504. http://dx.doi.org/10.3950/jibiinkoka.114.498.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

Vincent, Jean-Louis. "EPIDEMIOLOGY AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES." Shock 21, Supplement (March 2004): 112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00024382-200403001-00446.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

Green, Matthew D., Andrew JG Apel, Thomas Naduvilath, and Fiona J. Stapleton. "Clinical outcomes of keratitis." Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology 35, no. 5 (July 2007): 421–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9071.2007.01511.x.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

Krumholz, H. M., Z. Lin, and S. L. T. Normand. "Measuring hospital clinical outcomes." BMJ 346, jan30 1 (January 30, 2013): f620. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f620.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

Zaylor, Charles. "Clinical outcomes in telepsychiatry." Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 5, no. 1_suppl (March 1999): 59–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1258/1357633991932577.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

Mallidi, Jaya, John Ulahannan, Vinod K. Chaubey, Auras R. Atreya, Muhammad T. Shakoor, Daniel Fisher, Jane Garb, and Amir Lotfi. "Comparison of Clinical Outcomes." Critical Pathways in Cardiology 18, no. 3 (September 2019): 130–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/hpc.0000000000000182.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
You might also be interested in the bibliographies on the topic 'Clinical Outcomes' for other source types:
Dissertations / Theses Books
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography