Academic literature on the topic 'Claudius Marius Victorius'

Victorious in the battle against Mark Antony for mastery over Rome, Octavian gradually revised the previously existing Republican system with a new regime, in which the “first among the equals” was in fact the sovereign ruler. Aiming to secure his power and its undisturbed succession in the next generation of Julio-Claudians, Octavian placed his own men in key positions in the state. These were not only individuals who were in a client relationship with Octavian Augustus, but also individuals whom the Princeps tied to his own family with marriage bonds; in that way he made a wide network of kin and marital interdependency on himself. This paper deals with a small section of that network – with Augustus’ legates who fought in Illyricum between 6 and 9 AD. These were the governors of three provinces – Illyricum, Moesia and Galatia – whose armies participated in the suppression of the great Pannonian-Dalmatian uprising. All three provinces were imperial, which means that the Princeps, and not the Senate, was in charge for election of their administrators. Illyricum, Moesia and Galatia are clear examples of the political and personal network Augustus cast over the Empire, and represent a model that was to be applied in other provinces – even those under senatorial authority. Narratives of historical sources about the Pannonian-Dalmatian uprising mention seven pivotal individuals in leading positions in the Roman army, in legions that during the three wartime years operated in Illyricum. These are: Tiberius (commander-in-chief of the joint military force – No. 4), Germanicus (his subordinate, a member of Augustus’ immediate family – No. 5), Marcus Valerius Messalla Corvinus Messallinus (governor of Illyricum in the year of the outbreak of the uprising – No. 9), Aulus Caecina Severus (governor of Moesia – No. 7), Marcus Plautius Silvanus (governor of Galatia – No. 8), Marcus Aemilius Lepidus (governor of Pannonia, northern part of recently divided Illyricum, in the last year of the war – No. 6), and Caius Vibius Postumus (governor of Dalmatia, southern part of recently divided Illyricum, in the last year of the war – No. 10). A number has been assigned to each of these men to fascilitate the tracking of their complex relations by blood and marriage which tied most of them mutually, and with Augustus himself. Numbers are also assigned to Augustus (No. 1), Mark Antony (No. 2) and Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa (No. 3), whom the Princeps firmly tied with his family. A short survey of activities of these seven legates in Illyricum during the war (6-9 AD) is followed by the second part of the paper that minutely explains their blood and marital relations. To each of the other persons relevant to our narrative a number is also assigned in order to track them through Augustus’ network. Extensive analysis of their mutual relations show that some of them were firmly related through family to the Julio-Claudians (Valerius Messallinus and Aemilius Lepidus), some were tied with client more than marital bonds (Plautius Silvanus), and some apparently were not highly dependent on Princeps (Caecina Severus and Vibius Postumus). However, all of them constituted important parts of the network which Augustus threw over the Empire, providing for himself and his successors secure and firm power, and for the State the long desired pax Romana.

Scientific Program Oral Presentations Authors Title Abstract CONSTANTIN MUNTEANU, Mihail HOTETEU, Diana MUNTEANU, Gabriela DOGARU - 12 minutes PERSPECTIVES OF BALNEOLOGY - INTERNATIONAL DATA INPUTS, NATIONAL OUTPUTS Link L1 UMBERTO SOLIMENE - 14 minutes CLIMATE AND HEALTH: A NEW CHALLENGE FOR AN OLD SCIENCE Link L2 Zeki KARAGÜLLE - 14 minutes BALNEOLOGICAL TREATMENTS WITH NATURAL HYDROGEN SULFIDE (H2S) Waters Link L3 Constantin Florin Dragan, Liliana Padure, Gelu Onose - 12 minutes SPECIFIC ADVANCED QUANTIFICATIONS ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE ANGULATION OF THE MAIN SCOLIOTIC CURVE AND LEG SWING IN THE GAIT PHASES, IN CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS WITH AND WITHOUT POSTURAL TREATMENT Link L4 Irina ALBADI, Camelia CIOBOTARU, Andreea-Alexandra LUPU, Ionela BALASA, Claudiu FATU, Enghin SACHIR, Gelu ONOSE - 12 minutes A MULTIMODAL APPROACHES TO MANAGE REHABILITATION THERAPY OF DISFUNCTIONALS ASPECTS TO A PACIENT WITH GOUT, MIELLITUS DIABETES, ATRIAL FIBRILATION AND MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY STROKE Link L5 ELENA RAEVSCHI - 12 minutes PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS IN Cardiovascular Diseases regarding the premature mortality reduction Link L6 ANIȘOARA CIMIL - 12 minutes THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE REHABILITATION PROGRAMME ACCORDING TO THE ETIOPATHOGENESIS OF PROSTHETIC JOINT PATHOLOGY Link L7 TRAIAN -VIRGILIU SURDU, Monica SURDU, Olga SURDU - 10 minutes FOURTH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION (INDUSTRY 4.0) AND MODERN THERMAL MEDICINE (THERME 4.0) IN XXIST CENTURY Link L8 Gabriela DOGARU, Akos MOLNAR, Marieta MOTRICALA - 10 minutes EFFECTS OF CARBONATED MINERAL WATER AND MOFETTE IN BĂILE TUŞNAD IN EXPERIMENTALLY INDUCED ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE Link L9 Q & A – 12 minutes Authors Title Abstract Aurelian Anghelescu, Valentin Deaconu, Catalina Axente,Elena Constantin, Gelu Onose - 12 minutes THERAPEUTIC DIFFICULTIES IN A YOUNG PATIENT WITH MULTIDRUG RESISTANT EPILEPSY (NEEDING VAGAL NERVE ELECTROSTIMULATION), SEQUELAE AFTER CONGENITAL VASCULAR CEREBRAL MALFORMATION, WITH CHRONIC GAIT IMPAIRMENTS AND RECENT TRAUMATIC BRAIN COMPLICATION Link L10 Luminița NIRLU, Alexandru G. STAVRICĂ, Laura Georgiana Popescu, Ana Carmen Albeșteanu, Ali-Osman Saglam, Gelu Onose - 12 minutes DIAGNOSTIC PARTICULARITIES AND MULTIMODAL THERAPEUTIC AND REHABILITATION APPROACHES TO A COMPLEX CASE OF POST ISCHEMIC STROKE WITH DYSPHAGIA AND DYSPHONIA, ASSOCIATING MILLARD-GUBLER AND WALLENBERG SYNDROMES - CASE REPORT Link L11 Cristina Octaviana DAIA, Croitoru Stefana, Mariana Axente, Gelu ONOSE - 14 minutes IONTOPHORESIS AND LASER APPLICATIONS IN FACIAL NERVE PALSY Link L12 Doina Maria MOLDOVAN, Gabriela DOGARU - 12 minutes SPLINTING VERSUS SURGICAL TREATMENT IN MALLET FINGER Link L13 Doina Maria MOLDOVAN, Gabriela DOGARU - 12 minutes EARLY REHABILITATION IN PATIENT AFTER TREATMENT FOR DISTAL RADIUS FRACTURE Link L14 Liliana PADURE, Raluca PETCU, Anca Irina GRIGORIU - 12 minutes THE IMPACT OF MULTIFACTORIAL GAIT ANALYSIS ON THE DIAGNOSIS AND REHABILITATION OF CHILDREN WITH WALKING DISORDERS Link L15 Valerica Creanga-Zarnescu, Ana-Maria Fatu, Mihaela Lungu, Violeta Sapira, Anamaria Ciubara - 12 minutes REHABILITATION POSSIBILITIES OF APHASIC PATIENT Link L16 Cristina DAIA, Simona SCHEK, Stefana CROITORU, Alina GHERGHICEANU, Gelu ONOSE - 12 minutes FAVORABLE REHABILITATION RESULTS ON A PATIENT WITH SEVERE LEFT HEMIPLEGIA AFTER AN INTRAPARENCHYMAL HEMATOMA Link L17 Elena VIZITIU, Mihai CONSTANTINESCU, Sînziana Călina SILIȘTEANU - 12 minutes THE ROLE OF THERAPEUTIC SWIMMING IN THE PROPHYLAXIS OF SCOLIOSIS IN THE "C" LEFT IN CHILDREN DURING THE PREPUBERTAL PERIOD Link L18 Q & A – 12 minutes Authors Title Abstract Alexandru G. STAVRICĂ, Luminiţa Nirlu, Laura Georgiana Popescu, Ana Carmen Albeşteanu, Gelu ONOSE - 12 minutes DIAGNOSTIC AND THERAPEUTIC APPROACHES IN REHABILITATION CORRELATED TO A CASE OF TETRAPARESIS (WITH PREDOMINANCE OF PARAPARESIS) AFTER SEVERE CCT - BIFRONTO - BASAL AND BITEMPORAL CONTUSION. Link L19 Ana Maria Bumbea, Otilia Rogoveanu, Carmen,Albu Rodica Traistaru, Catalin,Bostina, Bogdan Stefan Bumbea, Roxana Dumitrascu, Borcan Madalina MANAGEMENT OF SPASTICITY IN NEUROLOGICAL PATIENTS Link L20 Laura Georgiana Popescu, Luminița Nirlu, Ana Carmen Albeșteanu, Ali Osman Saglam, Gelu Onose - 12 minutes PARTICULARITIES OF COMPLEX THERAPEUTICALLY-REHABILITATIVE MANAGEMENT, STEPWISE, IN A PATIENT WITH POST-CCT PSYCHO-COGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT IN A LARGE POLYTRAMATIC CONTEXT - CASE REPORT Link L21 Adrian MELNIC, Oleg PASCAL - 12 minutes DEVELOPING STRATEGIES TO ADDRESS COMORBIDITY IN STROKE REHABILITATION. Link L22 Dorin-Gheorghe TRIFF, Simona POP - 12 minutes MONOGENIC DISEASES WITH MUSCULO ARTICULAR LAXITY. DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA AND PRINCIPLES OF RECOVERY THERAPY Link L23 Catalin Ionite, Dragos Arotaritei, Mihai Ilea, Mariana Rotariu - 12 minutes THE USE OF ELASTIC BANDS IN THE RECOVERY OF ANKLE SPRAINS Link L24 Mariana Rotariu, Marius Turnea, Calin Corciova, Catalin Ionite - 12 minutes THE EFFECTS OF CUBE THERAPY IN THE RECOVERY OF THE ARTHROSIS HAND IN GERIATRICS Link L25 Cristian Ştefan LIUŞNEA - 12 minutes FITNESS AND WELLNESS. CONCEPTUAL DELIMITATIONS Link L26 Adriana LUPU - 12 minutes NSAID THERAPY OF MUSCULOSKELETAL PAINS AND ITS PARTICULARITIES IN THE PATIENTS SUFFERING FROM CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS Link L27 Q & A – 12 minutes Authors Title Abstract Mihaela MANDU, Cristinel Dumitru BADIU, Raluca PETCU, Cosmin OPREA, Gelu ONOSE - 12 minutes CLINICAL-EVOLUTIVE PARTICULARITIES AND A MULTIMODAL THERAPEUTIC-REHABILITATIVE, AS WELL AS THROUGH CONNECTED CARES, APPROACH, IN A CASE OF HEMIPLEGIA AFTER ISCHEMIC CARDIO-EMBOLIC STROKE WITHIN A POLYPATHOLOGICAL CONTEXT Link L28 Ana Carmen Albesteanu, Laura Georgiana Popescu, Luminița Nirlu, Ali Osman Saglam, Gelu Onose - 12 minutes MULTIMODAL - REHABILITATIVE THERAPEUTICAL APPROACHES IN A COMPLEX OF PATHOLOGY INCLUDING POSSIBLY EVOLVING DISCARIOTIC TYPE - CASE REPORT Link L29 Liliana PADURE, Cristian Adam, Laura Fierbinteanu - 12 minutes ATTACHMENT - PROGNOSTIC FACTOR IN MEDICAL RECOVERY Link L30 Prof. Alexandru Vlad Ciurea - 20 minutes MOTILITY OR MORBIDITY IN NEUROSURGERY Link L31 Valerica CREANGA-ZARNESCU, Ana-Maria FATU, Anamaria CIUBARA, Violeta SAPIRA,Aurelia ROMILA, Mihaela LUNGU - 12 minutes EXERCISES PROGRAM AND REHABILITATION IN PARKINSON’S DISEASE Link L32 Irina VERINCEANU,Alice MUNTEANU, Andreea STOICA, Stefan ISPAS - 12 minutes THE CARDIAC REHABILITATION IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION Link L33 Marius Turnea, Catalin Ionite, Mihai Ilea, Dragos Arotaritei - 12 minutes STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF PHYSIOTHERAPEUTIC MEANS USED IN THE RECOVERY OF MUSCLE INJURIES IN ATHLETES Link L34 Mihaiela CHICU, Eugen BITERE - 10 minutes THE ROLE OF IL1β IN CARTILAGINOUS DISTRUCTION IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS Link L35 Mihaiela CHICU, Eugen BITERE - 10 minutes THE ROLE OF THE INFLAMMASOMS IN THE PATHOGENESIS OF INFLAMMATORY REACTION Link L36 Q & A – 8 minutes Authors Title Abstract Prof. Dr. Gelu Onose, (Keynote Speaker) Vlad Ciobanu, Corina Sporea - 20 minutes A TOPICAL SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW AND REAPPRAISAL ON ESSAYS TOWARDS SYSTEMATIZING CLINICAL ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS USED TO EVALUATE NEURO-functional deficits after spinal cord injuries, mainly in adults, including through the ICF(-DH) conceptual framework Link L37 Diana-Elena SERBAN, Aurelian ANGHELESCU, Elena CONSTANTIN, Gelu ONOSE - 12 minutes THE ACQUISITION OF SELF-DEFENSE TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES AGAINST THE ACT OF AGGRESSION IN THE PACIENT WITH PARAPLEGIA, WHEEL-CHAIR INDEPENDENT Link L38 Aurelian Anghelescu, Elena Constantin, Anca Sanda Mihaescu, Gelu Onose - 12 minutes “PREVENTION IS CURE, EDUCATION IS ESSENTIAL” - RESPONSIBLE IMPLICATION OF YOUNG PEOPLE IN EDUCATIONAL AND PROPHYLACTIC ACTIONS AGAINST ACCIDENTAL CERVICAL SPINAL CORD INJURY AND SEVERE DISABILITIES BY DIVING IN UNVERIFIED WATERS. Link L39 Alexandra SPORICI, Irina ANGHEL, Lapadat MAGDALENA, Gelu ONOSE - 12 minutes RECOVERABLE RESULTS AT A PATIENT WITH AIS/FRANKEL D INCOMPLETE TETRAPLEGIA / POST SPINAL CORD INJURY BY FALLING FROM A HEIGHT, ON AN ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS BACKGROUND Link L40 Ioana ANDONE, Carmen CHIPĂRUȘ, Andreea FRUNZA, Aura SPÎNU, Simona STOICA, Liliana ONOSE, George PATRASCU, Gelu ONOSE -12 minutes CLINICAL, PARACLINICAL ASPECTS AND COMPLEX THERAPEUTICAL APPROACHES IN A PATIENT WITH INCOMPLETE PARAPLEGIA, POST THORACIC MENIGIOMA SURGICALLY TREATED, IN NEUROFIBROMATOSIS CONTEXT Link L41 Cristina Octaviana DAIA, Alina-Elena Gherghiceanu, Helene Ivan, Gelu ONOSE - 12 minutes RESEARCH ON NEUROREHABILITATION RESULTS IN VERTEBRO-MEDULLARY POST-TRAUMATIC CONDITIONS ASSOCIATING FRACTURES, IN A POLITRAMATIC CONTEXT Link L42 Ali-Osman Saglam, Alexandru G. Stavrica, Ana Carmen Albeşteanu, Laura Georgiana Popescu, Luminita Nirlu, Gelu Onose - 12 minutes MEDICAL-REHABILITATION ENDEAVORS, CARE INTERVENTIONS AND CONNOTATIONS OF A MEDICO-SOCIAL TYPE, IN A COMPLEX POLYPATHOLOGICAL CASE: PARAPLEGIA, SPONDYLODISCITIS, KIDNEY FAILURE IN THE HAEMODIALYSIS STAGE AND BILATERAL NEPHROSTOMIES AFTER SURGICALY TREATTED BLADDER NEOPLASM. Link L43 Sorina Petrușan-Dunca, Liviu Lazăr, Tiberiu-Dorin Corha - 12 minutes INDICATIONS AND LIMITIS OF REHABILITATION TREATMENT FOR LUMBAR DISCOPATHY IN PREGNACY Link L44 Q & A – 8 minutes Authors Title Abstract Elena Silvia SHELBY, Mihaela AXENTE, Liliana PĂDURE - 12 minutes CHARCOT MARIE TOOTH DISEASE. CASE PRESENTATION. GENETIC DISEASES WHICH REQUIRE physical rehabilitation Link L45 Link L46 Simona Carniciu - 12 minutes Influence of nutrition and exercise on the use of different energy substrates in the prevention of metabolic diseases Link L81 Simona-Isabelle STOICA, Carmen Elena CHIPĂRUȘ, Magdalena Vasilica LAPADAT, George PĂTRAȘCU, Gelu ONOSE - 12 minutes CLINICAL-THERAPEUTIC AND RECUPERATORY FEATURES IN A PATIENT WITH PLURIPATOLOGY: ISCHEMIC STROKE, ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE (SECHELAR MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION), CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE AND MONSTROUS GOUT- CASE PRESENTATION Link L47 Eugen BITERE, Mihaiela CHICU - 12 minutes PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF ATHEROGENESIS AND CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN CHRONIC INFLAMMATORY DISEASES Link L48 Victoria CHIHAI, Alisa TĂBÎRȚĂ, Anastasia ROTĂREANU, Vladlena MIHAILOV, Mihail CÎRÎM - 12 minutes THE IMPACT OF ACTIVE KINETIC PROGRAMS ON CLINICAL AND FUNCTIONAL STATUS ADRESSED TO PEOPLE WITH DIABETIC ANGIOPATHY Link L49 Ana-Maria Fătu, Ana Maria Pâslaru, Valerica Creangă-Zărnescu, Alexandru Nechifor, Mădălina Verenca, Mihaela Lungu, Anamaria Ciubară - 12 minutes THE IMPACT OF COGNITIVE DECLINE ON STROKE REHABILITATION Link L50 Alisa TĂBÎRŢĂ, Victoria CHIHAI - 12 minutes THE USE OF TRINITY AMPUTATION AND PROSTHESIS EXPERIENCE SCALES IN THE COMPLEX REHABILITATION OF PERSONS WITH LOWER LIBM AMPUTATION Link L51 Ilie ONU, Mariana ROTARIU, Elvina MIHALAȘ, Călin CORCIOVĂ - 12 minutes STUDY ON EFFICIENCY OF ELECTROTHERAPY AND PHYSIOTHERAPY MANAGEMENT ON HERNIATED LUMBAR DISC Link L52 María G. Souto Figueroa, Antonio Freire Magariños RESEARCH - SURVEY TO 142 THERMALIST WHO HAVE PERFORMED A THERMAL CURE AT THE BATHS OF BAÑOS DE MOLGAS (OURENSE) AND AUGAS SANTAS (LUGO) - GALICIA – SPAIN Link L53 Q & A – 12 minutes Authors Title Abstract Irina Ionica - 12 minutes ACUPUNCTURE IN REHABILITATION - A GENERAL VIEW Link L54 Denisa COAJĂ, Gabriela DOGARU - 12 minutes THE HEALTH BENEFITS OF FINNISH SAUNA BATHING Link L55 Otilia ROGOVEANU, Florin GHERGHINA , Rodica TRAISTARU - 12 minutes SPINA BIFIDA – FUNCTIONAL REHABILITATION METHODS IN CHILDREN Link L56 Mihaela DUTESCU, Raluca OLTEAN, Petru NENADICI - 12 minutes GEOAGIU BAI RESORT - OUR EXPERIENCE OF MEDICAL REHABILITATION TREATMENT Link L57 Dumitru MIHĂILĂ, SILISTEANU Sinziana Calina, ȚICULEANU Mihaela (Ciurlică) - 12 minutes THE METEOROLOGICAL COMPLEX AND THE HUMAN PATHOLOGY. CASE STUDY – SUCEAVA COUNTY Link L58 Mariana VARODI, Gabriela DOGARU - 12 minutes EFFICACY OF NATURAL THERAPEUTIC FACTORS FROM OCNA SIBIULUI SPA RESORT IN GONARTHROSIS Link L59 Boróka-Panna GÁSPÁR, Gabriela DOGARU - 12 minutes BONE HYDRATION AND MINERAL WATERS Link L60 CALIN BOCHIS, LIVIU LAZAR, HORAȚIU URECHESCU, CARMEN NISTOR-CSEPPENTO, FELICIA CIOARA, NICOLETA PASCALAU, ALIN BOCHIS , DIANA IOVANOVICI - 12 minutes CORRELATION OF VAS PAIN SCORE WITH FUNCTION AT THE PACIENTS WITH TEMPOROMANDIBULAR OSTEOARTHRITIS Link L61 Marian Romeo CALIN, Ileana RADULESCU, Mihaela Antonina CALIN, Elena Roxana ALMASAN - 12 minutes RADIOMETRIC ASSESSMENT OF PELOID AND SALT WATER USED FOR THERAPY AND BALNEARY TRATAMENT FROM TECHIRGHIOL LAKE, ROMANIA Link L62 Q & A – 12 minutes Authors Title Abstract Cristina PETRESCU - 12 minutes EFFICACY NATURAL THERAPEUTIC FACTORS FROM BAILE GOVORA IN BRONCHIAL ASTHMA Link L63 PARASCHIVA POSTOLACHE - 12 minutes PULMONARY REHABILITATION SAVES LIVES AND IMPROVES LIFE Link L64 DOINA-CLEMENTINA COJOCARU, PARASCHIVA POSTOLACHE - 12 minutes ASSESSMENT OF DYSPNEA IN PULMONARY REHABILITATION PRACTICE Link L65 PARASCHIVA POSTOLACHE, CRISTINA LACATUSI - 12 minutes HELIOTHERAPY, CLIMATOTHERAPY AND PATIENTS WITH RESPIRATORY DISEASES Link L66 CONSTANTIN MUNTEANU, DIANA MUNTEANU, MIHAIL HOTETEU - 12 minutes BIOLOGICAL INSIGHTS OF SPELEOTHERAPY Link L67 PARASCHIVA POSTOLACHE, CRISTINA LACATUSI, DOINA-CLEMENTINA COJOCARU - 12 minutes AEROSOLS AND BREATHING Link L68 PARASCHIVA POSTOLACHE, MADALINA ZEBEGA - 12 minutes RESPIRATORY MUSCLE TRAINING AND RESPIRATORY REHABILITATION Link L69 CRISTI FRENȚ, GEORGETA MAIORESCU - 12 minutes DEVELOPMENTS AND INVOLUTIONS OF TOURISM IN THE SPA RESORTS IN ROMANIA AND THE CASE STUDY FOR LACUL SĂRAT RESORT Link L70 Dragos Arotaritei, Andrei Gheorghita, Mariana Rotariu, Marius Turnea - 12 minutes MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF SULPHUR ABSORPTION PROCESS, A POSSIBLE APPLICATION IN CURE WITH SULPHUROUS MINERAL WATER Link L71 Q & A – 12 minutes Authors Title Abstract Mihai Ciocanu, Anișoara Cimil - 12 minutes THE EFFICIENCY OF THE REHABILITATION SERVICE IN HOSPITAL CONDITIONS Link L72 Sinziana Calina SILIȘTEANU, Andrei Emanuel SILIȘTEANU - 12 minutes TRIAL ON THE WATER CONSUMPTION BY THE PERSONS IN THE GROUP AGED 19-30 YEARS Link L73 Liviu Lazăr, Florin Marcu, Felicia Cioară, Carmen Nistor Csepentö - 12 minutes MANAGEMENT OF SPECIAL ARTERIAL DISEASES Link L74 Mihaela-Carmen SUCEVEANU, Paul-Nicolae SUCEVEANU - 12 minutes EVOLUTION OF CARDIOVASCULAR RISK FACTORS AFTER MORE THAN 2 PERIODIC HOSPITALIZATIONS IN THE COVASNA HOSPITAL FOR CARDIOVASCULAR REHABILITATION Link L75 Mihaela DUTESCU, Adina TRAILA, Margit SERBAN, Emilia URSU, Dorina MIU, Ioana MALITA, Bianca CIRESAN - 12 minutes THE EFFICIENCY OF MEDICAL REHABILITATION TREATMENT IN PATIENTS WITH HEMOPHILIA AFTER SURGICAL ORTHOPEDIC INTERVENTIONS - THE EXPERIENCE OF "CRISTIAN SERBAN" BUZIAS CENTER Link L76 Dorin-Gheorghe TRIFF, Simona POP - 12 minutes PRECURSORS OF BALENOLOGY EDUCATION IN ROMANIA Link L77 Dr. Eugenia Dumitrescu, Dr. Carmen Enescu - 12 minutes ANTIALLERGIC PROCEDURES MOST COMMONLY USED IN PHYSICAL RECOVERY MEDICINE AND BALNEOLOGY Link L78 Mihail HOTETEU, Constantin MUNTEANU, Diana MUNTEANU, Gabriela DOGARU - 12 minutes PELOIDS - PERSPECTIVES ON RESEARCH AND FUTURE PLANS Link L79 Liliana Stanciu, Daniela Profir, Viorica Marin, Doinița Oprea, Elena Ionescu, Elena Almășan, Carmen Oprea - 12 minutes THE SCIENCE OF AGING WELL Link L80 Q & A – 12 minutes POSTER SESSION Authors Title Abstract Andra Pintilie, Liliana Pădure, Andrada Mirea, Corina Sporea Proprioceptive Functional Vibration Stimulation as therapeutic tool in spasticity management of jump gait pattern of spastic diplegic children with cerebral palsy Poster 1 Andra Pintilie, Liliana Pădure, Andrada Mirea, Corina Sporea Modern computerized techniques for gait’s functional evaluation through a specialized wireless inertial sensor – premise for orthopedic corrective shoes wear in children with gait disorders secondary to Cerebral Palsy Poster 2 Ana Maria PÂSLARU, Ana Maria FĂTU, Anamaria CIUBARĂ The role of medical recovery in oncology Poster 3 Maria Veronica MORCOV, Liliana PADURE, Cristian Gabriel MORCOV, Gelu ONOSE Exercises availed by sensor-based computer advanced devices: part of the interactive cognitive recovery – adjuvant of the therapy applied in the Centrul National Clinic de Recuperare Neuropsihomotorie Copii “Dr. N. Robanescu” Poster 4 Avram Mihai, Liliana Padure, Gelu Onose Theoretical fundamentals and conceptual premise for advanced proprioceptive and sensory stimulus apparatus, with sequential evaluation for the treatment of the recuperator in the equilibrium disorder, from Cerebral Palsy (PC) casuistry. Poster 5 Andrada MIREA, Gelu ONOSE, Madalina LEANCA, Florin-Petru GRIGORAS, Mihaela AXENTE, Liliana PADURE, Corina SPOREA Respiratory management in patients with rare progressive neuromuscular diseases Poster 6 Mihaela MANDU, Elena CONSTANTIN, Cristinel Dumitru BADIU, Cosmin Daniel OPREA, Cristina DAIA, Gelu ONOSE Presentation od the Fugl Meyer Assesment scale and related suggesttion in order to enhance its level of implementation in inner neurorehabilitation units Poster 7 ALEXANDRU BOGDAN-CĂTĂLIN, ALINA SIMONA ȘOVREA, ANNE-MARIE CONSTANTIN, ADINA BIANCA BOȘCA, CARMEN GEORGIU, MONICA POPA Complex oral rehabilitation in an elderly patient with periodontal disease who exercises regularly Poster 8 Dorin-Gheorghe TRIFF, Simona POP MORBIDITY BY OSTEO-MUSCULO-ARTICULAR DISEASES IN THE OCCUPATIONAL ENVIRONMENT IN MARAMURES COUNTY. THE IMPORTANCE OF MEDICAL RECOVERY AND RECORDS THROUGH ELECTRONIC DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS Poster 9 Authors Title Abstract Mihaela Antonina CALIN, Marian Romeo CALIN, Constantin Munteanu New evidence on the effects of pelotherapy on local microcirculation Poster 10 Izabela Lazar, Gabriela Dogaru The effectiveness of balnear treatment in the management of psoriasis Poster 11 Dorin-Gheorghe TRIFF, Mușata Dacia BOCOȘ CORRELATIONS OF OSTEOMUSCULO-ARTICULAR DISEASES WITH WORK ABILITY, PERCEIVED SELF EFFICACY AND OCCUPATIONAL STRESSORS AT A REGULAR MEDICAL CHECK-UP IN PRE-UNIVERSITY EDUCATION UNITS Poster 12 Doroteea Teoibas-Serban, Valentin Stan, Dan Blendea PREVENTION OF LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION IN YOUNG ADULT POPULATION: A PRACTICAL APPROACH Poster 13 Călin Corciovă, Cătălina Luca, Robert Fuior, Flavia Corciovă Development a Monitoring Device for Arm Rehabilitation Poster 14 Simona Daniela Zavalichi, Marius Andrei Zavalichi, Sorin Stratulat, Florin Mitu Cardiovascular rehabilitation: challenges in a case of acute myocardial infarction and familial hypercholesterolemia Poster 15 Simona-Isabelle STOICA, Ioana TANASE, Gelu ONOSE Influences and consequences resulting in addictions in general and to chronic alcoholism, especially for patients with spinal cord injury Poster 16 Roxana Dumitrascu, Ana Maria Bumbea, Carmen Albu, Otilia Rogoveanu, Catalin Bostina, Rodica Traistaru, Borcan Madalina BIOMECHANICAL DYSFUNCTIONS OF THE FOOT – MAJOR IMPACT ON THE KINETIC CHAIN Poster 17 Otilia Rogoveanu, Gherghina Florin, Caimac Dan, Trifu Ramona, Cruceru Andra, Beldie C Medical rehabilitation in post-stroke spastic hemiparesis in young patients Poster 18 Ana Maria Bumbea, Otilia Rogoveanu, Roxana Dumitrascu, Bogdan Stefan Bumbea, Catalin Bostina, Albu Carmen, Borcan Madalina PERIPHERAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION - A CHALLENGE IN VERTEBRAL POSTTRAUMATIC RECOVERY Poster 19 Authors Title Abstract Dănuţ PĂCURAR, Mihaela Ramona PĂCURAR KNEE ARTHROPLASTY RECOVERY OF AN CANCER PATIENT Poster 20 Dănuţ PĂCURAR, Mihaela Ramona PĂCURAR THE IMPACT OF OSTEOARTICULAR PATHOLOGY IN POSTSTROKE RECOVERY Poster 21 Borcan Madalina, Bumbea Ana Maria, Bostina Catalin, Radoi Georgeta, Bumbea Bogdan EFFICIENT REHABILITATION TREATMENT IN A CASE WITH MAV-RUPTA MALFORMATION Poster 22 Demirgian Sibel, Nan Simona, Lulea Adela, Lascu Ioana, Marin Viorica Is possible the management of synovial chondromatosis of the hip by arthroscopy or complex balneal treament? Poster 23 Mădălina Codruța Verenca, Sorina Mierlan, Claudiu Elisei Tanase The Efficiency of Medical Treatment of Scoliosis – Paediatrics Poster 24 Florentina NASTASE¹, Alin Laurentiu TATU², Madalina Codruta VERENCA¹ Orthopaedic manifestations of Neurofibromatosis type 1 – case report Poster 25 Simona CARNICIU, Anatolie BACIU, Vasile FEDAS The attenuation of energy metabolic misbalance by means of aerobic, hypoxic, hypothermal adaptation and environment optimization at recreation resort center Poster 26 Irina Anghel, Alexandra Sporici, Magdalena Lapadat, Gelu Onose Complex clinical and therapeutic rehabilitation approach of a patient with Complete AIS/Frankel A quadriplegia post cervical spinal cord injury after accidental fall off a trailer and multiple complications occurring during disease progression - case study Poster 27 Ana-Maria Pelin , Monica Georgescu , Cristina Stefanescu , Costinela Georgescu Molecular treatment strategies in osteoporosis Poster 28

Anyone contemplating the role of a “hermeneutics of suspicion” in literary and cultural studies must concede that the phrase is rarely used—even by its most devout practitioners, who usually think of themselves engaged in something called “critique.” What, then, are the terminological differences between “critique” and “the hermeneutics of suspicion”? What intellectual worlds do these specific terms conjure up, and how do these worlds converge or diverge? And what is the rationale for preferring one term over the other?The “hermeneutics of suspicion” is a phrase coined by Paul Ricoeur to capture a common spirit that pervades the writings of Marx, Freud, and Nietzsche. In spite of their obvious differences, he argued, these thinkers jointly constitute a “school of suspicion.” That is to say, they share a commitment to unmasking “the lies and illusions of consciousness;” they are the architects of a distinctively modern style of interpretation that circumvents obvious or self-evident meanings in order to draw out less visible and less flattering truths (Ricoeur 356). Ricoeur’s term has sustained an energetic after-life within religious studies, as well as in philosophy, intellectual history, and related fields, yet it never really took hold in literary studies. Why has a field that has devoted so much of its intellectual energy to interrogating, subverting, and defamiliarising found so little use for Ricoeur’s phrase?In general, we can note that hermeneutics remains a path not taken in Anglo-American literary theory. The tradition of hermeneutical thinking is rarely acknowledged (how often do you see Gadamer or Ricoeur taught in a theory survey?), let alone addressed, assimilated, or argued over. Thanks to a lingering aura of teutonic stodginess, not to mention its long-standing links with a tradition of biblical interpretation, hermeneutics was never able to muster the intellectual edginess and high-wattage excitement generated by various forms of poststructuralism. Even the work of Gianni Vattimo, one of the most innovative and prolific of contemporary hermeneutical thinkers, has barely registered in the mainstream of literary and cultural studies. On occasion, to be sure, hermeneutics crops up as a synonym for a discredited model of “depth” interpretation—the dogged pursuit of a hidden true meaning—that has supposedly been superseded by more sophisticated forms of thinking. Thus the ascent of poststructuralism, it is sometimes claimed, signaled a turn away from hermeneutics to deconstruction and genealogy—leading to a focus on surface rather than depth, on structure rather than meaning, on analysis rather than interpretation. The idea of suspicion has fared little better. While Ricoeur’s account of a hermeneutics of suspicion is respectful, even admiring, critics are understandably leery of having their lines of argument reduced to their putative state of mind. The idea of a suspicious hermeneutics can look like an unwarranted personalisation of scholarly work, one that veers uncomfortably close to Harold Bloom’s tirades against the “School of Resentment” and other conservative complaints about literary studies as a hot-bed of paranoia, kill-joy puritanism, petty-minded pique, and defensive scorn. Moreover, the anti-humanist rhetoric of much literary theory—its resolute focus on transpersonal and usually linguistic structures of determination—proved inhospitable to any serious reflections on attitude, disposition, or affective stance.The concept of critique, by contrast, turns out to be marred by none of these disadvantages. An unusually powerful, flexible and charismatic idea, it has rendered itself ubiquitous and indispensable in literary and cultural studies. Critique is widely seen as synonymous with intellectual rigor, theoretical sophistication, and intransigent opposition to the status quo. Drawing a sense of intellectual weightiness from its connections to the canonical tradition of Kant and Marx, it has managed, nonetheless, to retain a cutting-edge sensibility, retooling itself to fit the needs of new fields ranging from postcolonial theory to disability studies. Critique is contagious and charismatic, drawing everything around it into its field of force, marking the boundaries of what counts as serious thought. For many scholars in the humanities, it is not just one good thing but the only conceivable thing. Who would want to be associated with the bad smell of the uncritical? There are five facets of critique (enumerated and briefly discussed below) that characterise its current role in literary and cultural studies and that have rendered critique an exceptionally successful rhetorical-cultural actor. Critique, that is to say, inspires intense attachments, serves as a mediator in numerous networks, permeates disciplines and institutional structures, spawns conferences, essays, courses, and book proposals, and triggers countless imitations, translations, reflections, revisions, and rebuttals (including the present essay). While nurturing a sense of its own marginality, iconoclasm, and outsiderdom, it is also exceptionally effective at attracting disciples, forging alliances, inspiring mimicry, and ensuring its own survival. In “Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam?” Bruno Latour remarks that critique has been so successful because it assures us that we are always right—unlike those naïve believers whose fetishes we strive to expose (225–48). At the same time, thanks to its self-reflexivity, the rhetoric of critique is more tormented and self-divided than such a description would suggest; it broods constantly over the shame of its own success, striving to detect signs of its own complicity and to root out all possible evidence of collusion with the status quo.Critique is negative. Critique retains the adversarial force of a suspicious hermeneutics, while purifying it of affective associations by treating negativity as an essentially philosophical or political matter. To engage in critique is to grapple with the oversights, omissions, contradictions, insufficiencies, or evasions in the object one is analysing. Robert Koch writes that “critical discourse, as critical discourse, must never formulate positive statements: it is always ‘negative’ in relation to its object” (531). Critique is characterised by its “againstness,” by its desire to take a hammer, as Latour would say, to the beliefs of others. Faith is to be countered with vigilant skepticism, illusion yields to a sobering disenchantment, the fetish must be defetishised, the dream world stripped of its befuddling powers. However, the negativity of critique is not just a matter of fault-finding, scolding, and censuring. The nay-saying critic all too easily calls to mind the Victorian patriarch, the thin-lipped schoolmarm, the glaring policeman. Negating is tangled up with a long history of legislation, prohibition and interdiction—it can come across as punitive, arrogant, authoritarian, or vitriolic. In consequence, defenders of critique often downplay its associations with outright condemnation. It is less a matter of refuting particular truths than of scrutinising the presumptions and procedures through which truths are established. A preferred idiom is that of “problematising,” of demonstrating the ungroundedness of beliefs rather than denouncing errors. The role of critique is not to castigate, but to complicate, not to engage in ideas’ destruction but to expose their cultural construction. Barbara Johnson, for example, contends that a critique of a theoretical system “is not an examination of its flaws and imperfections” (xv). Rather, “the critique reads backwards from what seems natural, obvious, self-evident, or universal in order to show that these things have their history” and to show that the “start point is not a (natural) given, but a (cultural) construct, usually blind to itself” (Johnson xv–xvi). Yet it seems a tad disingenuous to describe such critique as free of negative judgment and the examination of flaws. Isn’t an implicit criticism being transmitted in Johnson’s claim that a cultural construct is “usually blind to itself”? And the adjectival chain “natural, obvious, self-evident, or universal” strings together some of the most negatively weighted words in contemporary criticism. A posture of detachment, in other words, can readily convey a tacit or implicit judgment, especially when it is used to probe the deep-seated convictions, primordial passions, and heart-felt attachments of others. In this respect, the ongoing skirmishes between ideology critique and poststructuralist critique do not over-ride their commitment to a common ethos: a sharply honed suspicion that goes behind the backs of its interlocutors to retrieve counter-intuitive and uncomplimentary meanings. “You do not know that you are ideologically-driven, historically determined, or culturally constructed,” declares the subject of critique to the object of critique, “but I do!” As Marcelo Dascal points out, the supposedly non-evaluative stance of historical or genealogical argument nevertheless retains a negative or demystifying force in tracing ideas back to causes invisible to the actors themselves (39–62).Critique is secondary. A critique is always a critique of something, a commentary on another argument, idea, or object. Critique does not vaunt its self-sufficiency, independence, and autotelic splendor; it makes no pretense of standing alone. It could not function without something to critique, without another entity to which it reacts. Critique is symbiotic; it does its thinking by responding to the thinking of others. But while secondary, critique is far from subservient. It seeks to wrest from a text a different account than it gives of itself. In doing so, it assumes that it will meet with, and overcome, a resistance. If there were no resistance, if the truth were self-evident and available for all to see, the act of critique would be superfluous. Its goal is not the slavish reconstruction of an original or true meaning but a counter-reading that brings previously unfathomed insights to light. The secondariness of critique is not just a logical matter—critique presumes the existence of a prior object—but also a temporal one. Critique comes after another text; it follows or succeeds another piece of writing. Critique, then, looks backward and, in doing so, it presumes to understand the past better than the past understands itself. Hindsight becomes insight; from our later vantage point, we feel ourselves primed to see better, deeper, further. The belatedness of critique is transformed into a source of iconoclastic strength. Scholars of Greek tragedy or Romantic poetry may mourn their inability to inhabit a vanished world, yet this historical distance is also felt as a productive estrangement that allows critical knowledge to unfold. Whatever the limitations of our perspective, how can we not know more than those who have come before? We moderns leave behind us a trail of errors, finally corrected, like a cloud of ink from a squid, remarks Michel Serres (48). There is, in short, a quality of historical chauvinism built into critique, making it difficult to relinquish a sense of in-built advantage over those lost souls stranded in the past. Critique likes to have the last word. Critique is intellectual. Critique often insists on its difference from everyday practices of criticism and judgment. While criticism evaluates a specific object, according to one definition, “critique is concerned to identify the conditions of possibility under which a domain of objects appears” (Butler 109). Critique is interested in big pictures, cultural frameworks, underlying schema. It is a mode of thought well matched to the library and seminar room, to a rhythm of painstaking inquiry rather than short-term problem-solving. It “slows matters down, requires analysis and reflection, and often raises questions rather than providing answers” (Ruitenberg 348). Critique is thus irresistibly drawn toward self-reflexive thinking. Its domain is that of second-level observation, in which we reflect on the frames, paradigms, and perspectives that form and inform our understanding. Even if objectivity is an illusion, how can critical self-consciousness not trump the available alternatives? This questioning of common sense is also a questioning of common language: self-reflexivity is a matter of form as well as content, requiring the deployment of what Jonathan Culler and Kevin Lamb call “difficult language” that can undermine or “un-write” the discourses that make up our world (1–14). Along similar lines, Paul Bove allies himself with a “tradition that insists upon difficulty, slowness, complex, often dialectical and highly ironic styles,” as an essential antidote to the “prejudices of the current regime of truth: speed, slogans, transparency, and reproducibility” (167). Critique, in short, demands an arduous working over of language, a stoic refusal of the facile phrase and ready-made formula. Yet such programmatic divisions between critique and common sense have the effect of relegating ordinary language to a state of automatic servitude, while condescending to those unschooled in the patois of literary and critical theory. Perhaps it is time to reassess the dog-in-the-manger attitude of a certain style of academic argument—one that assigns to scholars the vantage point of the lucid and vigilant thinker, while refusing to extend this same capacity to those naïve and unreflecting souls of whom they speak.Critique comes from below. Politics and critique are often equated and conflated in literary studies and elsewhere. Critique is iconoclastic in spirit; it rails against authority; it seeks to lay bare the injustices of the law. It is, writes Foucault, the “art of voluntary insubordination, that of reflected intractability” (194). This vision of critique can be traced back to Marx and is cemented in the tradition of critical theory associated with the Frankfurt School. Critique conceives of itself as coming from below, or being situated at the margins; it is the natural ally of excluded groups and subjugated knowledges; it is not just a form of knowledge but a call to action. But who gets to claim the mantle of opposition, and on what grounds? In a well-known essay, Nancy Fraser remarks that critical theory possesses a “partisan though not uncritical identification” with oppositional social movements (97). As underscored by Fraser’s judicious insertion of the phrase “not uncritical,” critique guards its independence and reserves the right to query the actions and attitudes of the oppressed as well as the oppressors. Thus the intellectual’s affiliation with a larger community may collide with a commitment to the ethos of critique, as the object of a more heartfelt attachment. A separation occurs, as Francois Cusset puts it, “between academics questioning the very methods of questioning” and the more immediate concerns of the minority groups with which they are allied (157). One possible strategy for negotiating this tension is to flag one’s solidarity with a general principle of otherness or alterity—often identified with the utopian or disruptive energies of the literary text. This strategy gives critique a shot in the arm, infusing it with a dose of positive energy and ethical substance, yet without being pinned down to the ordinariness of a real-world referent. This deliberate vagueness permits critique to nurture its mistrust of the routines and practices through which the everyday business of the world is conducted, while remaining open to the possibility of a radically different future. Critique in its positive aspects thus remains effectively without content, gesturing toward a horizon that must remain unspecified if it is not to lapse into the same fallen state as the modes of thought that surround it (Fish 446).Critique does not tolerate rivals. Declaring itself uniquely equipped to diagnose the perils and pitfalls of representation, critique often chafes at the presence of other forms of thought. Ruling out the possibility of peaceful co-existence or even mutual indifference, it insists that those who do not embrace its tenets must be denying or disavowing them. In this manner, whatever is different from critique is turned into the photographic negative of critique—evidence of an irrefutable lack or culpable absence. To refuse to be critical is to be uncritical; a judgment whose overtones of naiveté, apathy, complacency, submissiveness, and sheer stupidity seem impossible to shrug off. In short, critique thinks of itself as exceptional. It is not one path, but the only conceivable path. Drew Milne pulls no punches in his programmatic riff on Kant: “to be postcritical is to be uncritical: the critical path alone remains open” (18).The exceptionalist aura of critique often thwarts attempts to get outside its orbit. Sociologist Michael Billig, for example, notes that critique thinks of itself as battling orthodoxy, yet is now the reigning orthodoxy—no longer oppositional, but obligatory, not defamiliarising, but oppressively familiar: “For an increasing number of younger academics,” he remarks, “the critical paradigm is the major paradigm in their academic world” (Billig 292). And in a hard-hitting argument, Talal Asad points out that critique is now a quasi-automatic stance for Western intellectuals, promoting a smugness of tone that can be cruelly dismissive of the deeply felt beliefs and attachments of others. Yet both scholars conclude their arguments by calling for a critique of critique, reinstating the very concept they have so meticulously dismantled. Critique, it seems, is not to be abandoned but intensified; critique is to be replaced by critique squared. The problem with critique, it turns out, is that it is not yet critical enough. The objections to critique are still very much part and parcel of the critique-world; the value of the critical is questioned only to be emphatically reinstated.Why do these protestations against critique end up worshipping at the altar of critique? Why does it seem so exceptionally difficult to conceive of other ways of arguing, reading, and thinking? We may be reminded of Eve Sedgwick’s comments on the mimetic aspect of critical interpretation: its remarkable ability to encourage imitation, repetition, and mimicry, thereby ensuring its own reproduction. It is an efficiently running form of intellectual machinery, modeling a style of thought that is immediately recognisable, widely applicable, and easily teachable. Casting the work of the scholar as a never-ending labour of distancing, deflating, and diagnosing, it rules out the possibility of a different relationship to one’s object. It seems to grow, as Sedgwick puts it, “like a crystal in a hypersaturated solution, blotting out any sense of the possibility of alternative ways of understanding or things to understand” (131).In this context, a change in vocabulary—a redescription, if you will—may turn out to be therapeutic. It will come as no great surprise if I urge a second look at the hermeneutics of suspicion. Ricoeur’s phrase, I suggest, can help guide us through the interpretative tangle of contemporary literary studies. It seizes on two crucial parts of critical argument—its sensibility and its interpretative method—that deserve more careful scrutiny. At the same time, it offers a much-needed antidote to the charisma of critique: the aura of ethical and political exemplarity that burnishes its negativity with a normative glow. Thanks to this halo effect, I’ve suggested, we are encouraged to assume that the only alternative to critique is a full-scale surrender to complacency, quietism, and—in literary studies—the intellectual fluff of aesthetic appreciation. Critique, moreover, presents itself as an essentially disembodied intellectual exercise, an austere, even abstemious practice of unsettling, unmaking, and undermining. Yet contemporary styles of critical argument are affective as well as analytical, conjuring up distinctive dispositions and relations to their object. As Amanda Anderson has pointed out in The Way We Argue Now, literary and cultural theory is saturated with what rhetoricians call ethos—that is to say, imputations of motive, character, or attitude. We need only think of the insouciance associated with Rortyan pragmatism, the bad-boy iconoclasm embraced by some queer theorists, or the fastidious aestheticism that characterises a certain kind of deconstructive reading. Critical languages, in other words, are also orientations, encouraging readers to adopt an affectively tinged stance toward their object. Acknowledging the role of such orientations in critical debate does not invalidate its intellectual components, nor does it presume to peer into, or diagnose, an individual scholar’s state of mind.In a related essay, I scrutinise some of the qualities of a suspicious or critical reading practice: distance rather than closeness; guardedness rather than openness; aggression rather than submission; superiority rather than reverence; attentiveness rather than distraction; exposure rather than tact (215–34). Suspicion, in this sense, constitutes a muted affective state—a curiously non-emotional emotion of morally inflected mistrust—that overlaps with, and builds upon, the stance of detachment that characterises the stance of the professional or expert. That this style of reading proves so alluring has much to do with the gratifications and satisfactions that it offers. Beyond the usual political or philosophical justifications of critique, it also promises the engrossing pleasure of a game-like sparring with the text in which critics deploy inventive skills and innovative strategies to test their wits, best their opponents, and become sharper, shrewder, and more sophisticated players. In this context, the claim that contemporary criticism has moved “beyond” hermeneutics should be treated with a grain of salt, given that, as Stanley Fish points out, “interpretation is the only game in town” (446). To be sure, some critics have backed away from the model of what they call “depth interpretation” associated with Marx and Freud, in which reading is conceived as an act of digging and the critic, like a valiant archaeologist, excavates a resistant terrain in order to retrieve the treasure of hidden meaning. In this model, the text is envisaged as possessing qualities of interiority, concealment, penetrability, and depth; it is an object to be plundered, a puzzle to be solved, a secret message to be deciphered. Instead, poststructuralist critics are drawn to the language of defamiliarising rather than discovery. The text is no longer composed of strata and the critic does not burrow down but stands back. Instead of brushing past surface meanings in pursuit of hidden truth, she dwells in ironic wonder on these surface meanings, seeking to “denaturalise” them through the mercilessness of her gaze. Insight, we might say, is achieved by distancing rather than by digging. Recent surveys of criticism often highlight the rift between these camps, underscoring the differences between the diligent seeker after buried truth and the surface-dwelling ironist. From a Ricoeur-inflected point of view, however, it is their shared investment in a particular ethos—a stance of knowingness, guardedness, suspicion and vigilance—that turns out to be more salient and more striking. Moreover, these approaches are variously engaged in the dance of interpretation, seeking to go beyond the backs of texts or fellow-actors in order to articulate non-obvious and often counter-intuitive truths. In the case of poststructuralism, we can speak of a second-order hermeneutics that is less interested in probing the individual object than the larger frameworks and conditions in which it is embedded. What the critic interprets is no longer a self-contained poem or novel, but a broader logic of discursive structures, reading formations, or power relations. Ricoeur’s phrase, moreover, has the singular advantage of allowing us to by-pass the exceptionalist tendencies of critique: its presumption that whatever is not critique can only be assigned to the ignominious state of the uncritical. As a less prejudicial term, it opens up a larger history of suspicious reading, including traditions of religious questioning and self-scrutiny that bear on current forms of interpretation, but that are occluded by the aggressively secular connotations of critique (Hunter). In this context, Ricoeur’s own account needs to be supplemented and modified to acknowledge this larger cultural history; the hermeneutics of suspicion is not just the brain-child of a few exceptional thinkers, as his argument implies, but a widespread practice of interpretation embedded in more mundane, diffuse and variegated forms of life (Felski 220).Finally, the idea of a suspicious hermeneutics does not invalidate or rule out other interpretative possibilities—ranging from Ricoeur’s own notion of a hermeneutics of trust to more recent coinages such as Sedgwick’s “restorative reading,” Sharon Marcus’s “just reading” or Timothy Bewes’s “generous reading.” Literary studies in France, for example, is currently experiencing a new surge of interest in hermeneutics (redefined as a practice of reinvention rather than exhumation) as well as a reinvigorated phenomenology of reading that elucidates, in rich and fascinating detail, its immersive and affective dimensions (see Citton; Macé). This growing interest in the ethos, aesthetics, and ethics of reading is long overdue. Such an orientation by no means rules out attention to the sociopolitical resonances of texts and their interpretations. It is, however, no longer willing to subordinate such attention to the seductive but sterile dichotomy of the critical versus the uncritical.ReferencesAnderson, Amanda. The Way We Argue Now: A Study in the Cultures of Theory. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2005.Asad, Talal. “Free Speech, Blasphemy, and Secular Criticism.” Is Critique Secular? Blasphemy, Injury, and Free Speech. Ed. Talal Asad, Wendy Brown, Judith Butler, and Saba Mahmood. Berkeley: Townsend Center for the Humanities, 2009. 20–63. Bewes, Timothy. “Reading with the Grain: A New World in Literary Studies.” Differences 21.3 (2010): 1–33.Billig, Michael. “Towards a Critique of the Critical.” Discourse and Society 11.3 (2000): 291–92. Bloom, Harold. The Western Canon: The Books and School of the Ages. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1994.Bove, Paul. Mastering Discourse: The Politics of Intellectual Culture. Durham: Duke UP, 1992. Butler, Judith. “The Sensibility of Critique: Response to Asad and Mahmood.” Is Critique Secular? Blasphemy, Injury, and Free Speech. Ed. Talal Asad, Wendy Brown, Judith Butler, and Saba Mahmood. Berkeley: Townsend Center for the Humanities, 2009. 101–136.Citton, Yves. Lire, interpréter, actualiser: pourqoi les études littéraires? Paris: Editions Amsterdam, 2007. Culler, Jonathan and Kevin Lamb, “Introduction.” Just Being Difficult? Academic Writing in the Public Arena. Ed. Jonathan Culler and Kevin Lamb. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2003. 1–14. Cusset, Francois. French Theory: How Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze, & Co. Transformed the Intellectual Life of the United States. Trans. Jeff Fort. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 2008.Dascal, Marcelo. “Critique without Critics?” Science in Context 10.1 (1997): 39–62.Felski, Rita. “Suspicious Minds.” Poetics Today 32.2 (2011): 215–34.Fish, Stanley. Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies. Durham: Duke UP, 1989.Foucault, Michel. “What is Critique?” The Political. Ed. David Ingram. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002. 191–211. Fraser, Nancy. “What’s Critical about Critical Theory? The Case of Habermas and Gender.” New German Critique 35 (1985): 97–131. Hunter, Ian. Rethinking the School: Subjectivity, Bureaucracy, Criticism. New York: St Martin’s Press, 1994.Johnson, Barbara. “Translator’s Introduction.” Jacques Derrida’s Dissemination. London: Continuum, 2004. vii–xxxv. Koch, Robert. “The Critical Gesture in Philosophy.” Iconoclash: Beyond the Image Wars in Science, Religion, and Art. Ed. Bruno Latour and Peter Weibel. Cambridge: MIT, 2002. 524–36. Latour, Bruno. “Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30 (2004): 225–48.Macé, Marielle. Facons de lire, manières d’être. Paris: Gallimard, 2011. Marcus, Sharon. Between Women: Friendship, Desire, and Marriage in Victorian England. Princeton: Princeton UP, 2007.Milne, Drew. “Introduction: Criticism and/or Critique.” Modern Critical Thought: An Anthology of Theorists Writing on Theorists. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002. 1–22. Ricoeur, Paul. Freud and Philosophy: An Essay on Interpretation. New Haven: Yale UP, 1970. Ruitenberg, Claudia. “Don’t Fence Me In: The Liberation of Undomesticated Critique.” Journal of the Philosophy of Education 38.3 (2004): 314–50. Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky. “Paranoid Reading and Reparative Reading, Or, You’re So Paranoid, You Probably Think This Essay is About You.” Touching Feeling: Affect, Pedagogy, Performativity. Durham: Duke UP, 2003. 123–52. Serres, Michel and Bruno Latour. Conversations on Science, Culture, and Time. Trans. Roxanne Lapidus. Ann Arbor: U of Michigan P, 1995.Vattimo, Gianni. Beyond Interpretation: The Meaning of Hermeneutics for Philosophy. Trans. David Webb. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1997.

Cette recherche propose une traduction complète de la paraphrase biblique génésiaque, intitulée Alethia, écrite par le rhéteur Claudius Marius Victorius au début du ve siècle. La traduction est accompagnée d’un commentaire qui associe l’étude théologique à la dimension littéraire du texte, en cherchant à rendre compte de la logique interne de l’œuvre. La thèse met en avant le déploiement de l’économie du salut dans la réécriture poétique, à travers l’illustration de la perte de la vérité et de l’articulation providentielle des alliances, des ruptures et des châtiments. La théologie de l’histoire, ainsi développée, offre un éclairage sur l’élargissement du péché et la diffusion du mal et de l’erreur, notamment le polythéisme, auxquels Dieu oppose une pédagogie providentielle. En somme, ce schéma du déploiement providentiel de Dieu dans l’histoire, au-delà du microcosme de l’histoire sainte, s’adresse à tout croyant comme une mise en garde contre la diffusion de l’erreur, en opposant l’adhésion libre au plan de Dieu, à l’instar des trois patriarches qui préfigurent le Christ et contribuent au retour de la vérité
This research offers a complete French translation of the biblical paraphrase of Genesis entitled Alethia, written by the rhetor Claudius Marius Victorius at the beginning of the fifth century. The translation goes along with a commentary that combines theological study and the literary dimension of the text, seeking to give an account of the internal logic of the work. The thesis highlights the deployment of the economy of salvation in the poetic rewriting, through the illustration of the loss of truth and the providential articulation of alliances, ruptures and punishments. The theology of history, developed in this way, sheds light on the expansion of sin and the spread of evil and error, particularly polytheism, to which God counters a providential pedagogy. In short, this outline of God's providential deployment in history, beyond the microcosm of holy history, is addressed to every believer as a warning not to participate in the spread of error, but to join freely God's plan, following the example of the three patriarchs who prefigure Christ and contribute to the return of truth